Effect of epinephrine on defibrillation in ischemic ventricular fibrillation

Epinephrine is thought to improve the success of defibrillation with countershock therapy. However, a recent study failed to show any effect of epinephrine in dogs with normal coronary arteries undergoing electrically-induced ventricular fibrillation (VF). In the current study, the effects of epinep...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The American journal of emergency medicine 1985-07, Vol.3 (4), p.285-291
Hauptverfasser: Otto, Charles W., Yakaitis, Ronald W., Ewy, Gordon A.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 291
container_issue 4
container_start_page 285
container_title The American journal of emergency medicine
container_volume 3
creator Otto, Charles W.
Yakaitis, Ronald W.
Ewy, Gordon A.
description Epinephrine is thought to improve the success of defibrillation with countershock therapy. However, a recent study failed to show any effect of epinephrine in dogs with normal coronary arteries undergoing electrically-induced ventricular fibrillation (VF). In the current study, the effects of epinephrine were examined in dogs with coronary occlusion undergoing both spontaneous and electrically-induced fibrillation. Forty pentobarbital-anesthetized dogs were prepared by placing snares around the circumflex and left anterior descending coronary arteries. Fibrillation and subsequent resuscitation were carried out with one coronary artery occluded. Dogs were randomly allocated so that half of the animals underwent spontaneous fibrillation and half were electrically fibrillated. In addition, half received epinephrine (1 mg) during resuscitation and half received normal saline solution (1 ml). After 3 minutes of cardiac arrest, cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) was begun, and 30 seconds later epinephrine or saline were injected. One minute later defibrillation was attempted using successive stored energy doses of 1, 2, 4, 8, 16, and 32 J/kg. Delivered energy and transthoracic impedance were measured for each countershock. Successful defibrillation was defined as conversion to any rhythm other than VF or ventricular tachycardia that degenerated in VF within 10 seconds. No other drugs were given during resuscitation. Neither the type of fibrillation (electrically-induced versus spontaneous) or drug therapy (epinephrine versus placebo) had a significant effect on the incidence of defibrillation or the energy necessary for successful defibrillation. Epinephrine did significantly increase the incidence of resuscitation. There were no differences among experimental groups in the duration of ischemia before VF, duration of CPR prior to successful defibrillation, transthoracic impedance during countershocks, or incidence of refibrillation following successful defibrillation. It is concluded that epinephrine does not improve the success of countershock therapy during resuscitation from VF in dogs with ischemic myocardium, although it does increase the incidence of successful return of spontaneous circulation after defibrillation.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/0735-6757(85)90048-8
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_76153635</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>0735675785900488</els_id><sourcerecordid>76153635</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c423t-1f4dd845d5890a5ebb50fc98854fd10d2b4e2ba95c6e0e59985c241fce6413993</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kEtLAzEQgIMotVb_gcKeRA-ryW5mN7kIUuoDCl70HHaTCY3soya7Bf-9qS3FkxAmhPlmMvMRcsnoHaOsuKdlDmlRQnkj4FZSykUqjsiUQZ6lgpXsmEwPyCk5C-GTUsY48AmZ8IhLWUzJcmEt6iHpbYJr1-F65WNM-i4xaF3tXdNUg4tPF0_QK2ydTjbYDd7psal88hc6Jye2agJe7O8Z-XhavM9f0uXb8-v8cZlqnuVDyiw3RnAwICStAOsaqNVSCODWMGqymmNWVxJ0gRRBSgE648xqLDjLpcxn5HrXd-37rxHDoNo4G8YpOuzHoMoiSihyiCDfgdr3IXi0au1dW_lvxajaSlRbQ2prSAlQvxKViGVX-_5j3aI5FO2txfzDLo9xyY1Dr4J22Gk0zkeZyvTu_w9-AMovgYY</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>76153635</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Effect of epinephrine on defibrillation in ischemic ventricular fibrillation</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Otto, Charles W. ; Yakaitis, Ronald W. ; Ewy, Gordon A.</creator><creatorcontrib>Otto, Charles W. ; Yakaitis, Ronald W. ; Ewy, Gordon A.</creatorcontrib><description>Epinephrine is thought to improve the success of defibrillation with countershock therapy. However, a recent study failed to show any effect of epinephrine in dogs with normal coronary arteries undergoing electrically-induced ventricular fibrillation (VF). In the current study, the effects of epinephrine were examined in dogs with coronary occlusion undergoing both spontaneous and electrically-induced fibrillation. Forty pentobarbital-anesthetized dogs were prepared by placing snares around the circumflex and left anterior descending coronary arteries. Fibrillation and subsequent resuscitation were carried out with one coronary artery occluded. Dogs were randomly allocated so that half of the animals underwent spontaneous fibrillation and half were electrically fibrillated. In addition, half received epinephrine (1 mg) during resuscitation and half received normal saline solution (1 ml). After 3 minutes of cardiac arrest, cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) was begun, and 30 seconds later epinephrine or saline were injected. One minute later defibrillation was attempted using successive stored energy doses of 1, 2, 4, 8, 16, and 32 J/kg. Delivered energy and transthoracic impedance were measured for each countershock. Successful defibrillation was defined as conversion to any rhythm other than VF or ventricular tachycardia that degenerated in VF within 10 seconds. No other drugs were given during resuscitation. Neither the type of fibrillation (electrically-induced versus spontaneous) or drug therapy (epinephrine versus placebo) had a significant effect on the incidence of defibrillation or the energy necessary for successful defibrillation. Epinephrine did significantly increase the incidence of resuscitation. There were no differences among experimental groups in the duration of ischemia before VF, duration of CPR prior to successful defibrillation, transthoracic impedance during countershocks, or incidence of refibrillation following successful defibrillation. It is concluded that epinephrine does not improve the success of countershock therapy during resuscitation from VF in dogs with ischemic myocardium, although it does increase the incidence of successful return of spontaneous circulation after defibrillation.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0735-6757</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1532-8171</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/0735-6757(85)90048-8</identifier><identifier>PMID: 4004996</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Animals ; Blood Pressure - drug effects ; Cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) ; Coronary Disease - complications ; Coronary Disease - therapy ; defibrillation ; Dogs ; Electric Countershock - methods ; epinephrine ; Epinephrine - pharmacology ; Heart - drug effects ; Heart - physiopathology ; Resuscitation ; ventricular fibrillation ; Ventricular Fibrillation - etiology ; Ventricular Fibrillation - therapy</subject><ispartof>The American journal of emergency medicine, 1985-07, Vol.3 (4), p.285-291</ispartof><rights>1985</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c423t-1f4dd845d5890a5ebb50fc98854fd10d2b4e2ba95c6e0e59985c241fce6413993</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c423t-1f4dd845d5890a5ebb50fc98854fd10d2b4e2ba95c6e0e59985c241fce6413993</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0735675785900488$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,27901,27902,65306</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/4004996$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Otto, Charles W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yakaitis, Ronald W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ewy, Gordon A.</creatorcontrib><title>Effect of epinephrine on defibrillation in ischemic ventricular fibrillation</title><title>The American journal of emergency medicine</title><addtitle>Am J Emerg Med</addtitle><description>Epinephrine is thought to improve the success of defibrillation with countershock therapy. However, a recent study failed to show any effect of epinephrine in dogs with normal coronary arteries undergoing electrically-induced ventricular fibrillation (VF). In the current study, the effects of epinephrine were examined in dogs with coronary occlusion undergoing both spontaneous and electrically-induced fibrillation. Forty pentobarbital-anesthetized dogs were prepared by placing snares around the circumflex and left anterior descending coronary arteries. Fibrillation and subsequent resuscitation were carried out with one coronary artery occluded. Dogs were randomly allocated so that half of the animals underwent spontaneous fibrillation and half were electrically fibrillated. In addition, half received epinephrine (1 mg) during resuscitation and half received normal saline solution (1 ml). After 3 minutes of cardiac arrest, cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) was begun, and 30 seconds later epinephrine or saline were injected. One minute later defibrillation was attempted using successive stored energy doses of 1, 2, 4, 8, 16, and 32 J/kg. Delivered energy and transthoracic impedance were measured for each countershock. Successful defibrillation was defined as conversion to any rhythm other than VF or ventricular tachycardia that degenerated in VF within 10 seconds. No other drugs were given during resuscitation. Neither the type of fibrillation (electrically-induced versus spontaneous) or drug therapy (epinephrine versus placebo) had a significant effect on the incidence of defibrillation or the energy necessary for successful defibrillation. Epinephrine did significantly increase the incidence of resuscitation. There were no differences among experimental groups in the duration of ischemia before VF, duration of CPR prior to successful defibrillation, transthoracic impedance during countershocks, or incidence of refibrillation following successful defibrillation. It is concluded that epinephrine does not improve the success of countershock therapy during resuscitation from VF in dogs with ischemic myocardium, although it does increase the incidence of successful return of spontaneous circulation after defibrillation.</description><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Blood Pressure - drug effects</subject><subject>Cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR)</subject><subject>Coronary Disease - complications</subject><subject>Coronary Disease - therapy</subject><subject>defibrillation</subject><subject>Dogs</subject><subject>Electric Countershock - methods</subject><subject>epinephrine</subject><subject>Epinephrine - pharmacology</subject><subject>Heart - drug effects</subject><subject>Heart - physiopathology</subject><subject>Resuscitation</subject><subject>ventricular fibrillation</subject><subject>Ventricular Fibrillation - etiology</subject><subject>Ventricular Fibrillation - therapy</subject><issn>0735-6757</issn><issn>1532-8171</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1985</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kEtLAzEQgIMotVb_gcKeRA-ryW5mN7kIUuoDCl70HHaTCY3soya7Bf-9qS3FkxAmhPlmMvMRcsnoHaOsuKdlDmlRQnkj4FZSykUqjsiUQZ6lgpXsmEwPyCk5C-GTUsY48AmZ8IhLWUzJcmEt6iHpbYJr1-F65WNM-i4xaF3tXdNUg4tPF0_QK2ydTjbYDd7psal88hc6Jye2agJe7O8Z-XhavM9f0uXb8-v8cZlqnuVDyiw3RnAwICStAOsaqNVSCODWMGqymmNWVxJ0gRRBSgE648xqLDjLpcxn5HrXd-37rxHDoNo4G8YpOuzHoMoiSihyiCDfgdr3IXi0au1dW_lvxajaSlRbQ2prSAlQvxKViGVX-_5j3aI5FO2txfzDLo9xyY1Dr4J22Gk0zkeZyvTu_w9-AMovgYY</recordid><startdate>198507</startdate><enddate>198507</enddate><creator>Otto, Charles W.</creator><creator>Yakaitis, Ronald W.</creator><creator>Ewy, Gordon A.</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>198507</creationdate><title>Effect of epinephrine on defibrillation in ischemic ventricular fibrillation</title><author>Otto, Charles W. ; Yakaitis, Ronald W. ; Ewy, Gordon A.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c423t-1f4dd845d5890a5ebb50fc98854fd10d2b4e2ba95c6e0e59985c241fce6413993</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1985</creationdate><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Blood Pressure - drug effects</topic><topic>Cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR)</topic><topic>Coronary Disease - complications</topic><topic>Coronary Disease - therapy</topic><topic>defibrillation</topic><topic>Dogs</topic><topic>Electric Countershock - methods</topic><topic>epinephrine</topic><topic>Epinephrine - pharmacology</topic><topic>Heart - drug effects</topic><topic>Heart - physiopathology</topic><topic>Resuscitation</topic><topic>ventricular fibrillation</topic><topic>Ventricular Fibrillation - etiology</topic><topic>Ventricular Fibrillation - therapy</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Otto, Charles W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yakaitis, Ronald W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ewy, Gordon A.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>The American journal of emergency medicine</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Otto, Charles W.</au><au>Yakaitis, Ronald W.</au><au>Ewy, Gordon A.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Effect of epinephrine on defibrillation in ischemic ventricular fibrillation</atitle><jtitle>The American journal of emergency medicine</jtitle><addtitle>Am J Emerg Med</addtitle><date>1985-07</date><risdate>1985</risdate><volume>3</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>285</spage><epage>291</epage><pages>285-291</pages><issn>0735-6757</issn><eissn>1532-8171</eissn><abstract>Epinephrine is thought to improve the success of defibrillation with countershock therapy. However, a recent study failed to show any effect of epinephrine in dogs with normal coronary arteries undergoing electrically-induced ventricular fibrillation (VF). In the current study, the effects of epinephrine were examined in dogs with coronary occlusion undergoing both spontaneous and electrically-induced fibrillation. Forty pentobarbital-anesthetized dogs were prepared by placing snares around the circumflex and left anterior descending coronary arteries. Fibrillation and subsequent resuscitation were carried out with one coronary artery occluded. Dogs were randomly allocated so that half of the animals underwent spontaneous fibrillation and half were electrically fibrillated. In addition, half received epinephrine (1 mg) during resuscitation and half received normal saline solution (1 ml). After 3 minutes of cardiac arrest, cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) was begun, and 30 seconds later epinephrine or saline were injected. One minute later defibrillation was attempted using successive stored energy doses of 1, 2, 4, 8, 16, and 32 J/kg. Delivered energy and transthoracic impedance were measured for each countershock. Successful defibrillation was defined as conversion to any rhythm other than VF or ventricular tachycardia that degenerated in VF within 10 seconds. No other drugs were given during resuscitation. Neither the type of fibrillation (electrically-induced versus spontaneous) or drug therapy (epinephrine versus placebo) had a significant effect on the incidence of defibrillation or the energy necessary for successful defibrillation. Epinephrine did significantly increase the incidence of resuscitation. There were no differences among experimental groups in the duration of ischemia before VF, duration of CPR prior to successful defibrillation, transthoracic impedance during countershocks, or incidence of refibrillation following successful defibrillation. It is concluded that epinephrine does not improve the success of countershock therapy during resuscitation from VF in dogs with ischemic myocardium, although it does increase the incidence of successful return of spontaneous circulation after defibrillation.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>4004996</pmid><doi>10.1016/0735-6757(85)90048-8</doi><tpages>7</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0735-6757
ispartof The American journal of emergency medicine, 1985-07, Vol.3 (4), p.285-291
issn 0735-6757
1532-8171
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_76153635
source MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals
subjects Animals
Blood Pressure - drug effects
Cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR)
Coronary Disease - complications
Coronary Disease - therapy
defibrillation
Dogs
Electric Countershock - methods
epinephrine
Epinephrine - pharmacology
Heart - drug effects
Heart - physiopathology
Resuscitation
ventricular fibrillation
Ventricular Fibrillation - etiology
Ventricular Fibrillation - therapy
title Effect of epinephrine on defibrillation in ischemic ventricular fibrillation
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-03T07%3A31%3A52IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Effect%20of%20epinephrine%20on%20defibrillation%20in%20ischemic%20ventricular%20fibrillation&rft.jtitle=The%20American%20journal%20of%20emergency%20medicine&rft.au=Otto,%20Charles%20W.&rft.date=1985-07&rft.volume=3&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=285&rft.epage=291&rft.pages=285-291&rft.issn=0735-6757&rft.eissn=1532-8171&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/0735-6757(85)90048-8&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E76153635%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=76153635&rft_id=info:pmid/4004996&rft_els_id=0735675785900488&rfr_iscdi=true