Hearing Status and Language Fluency as Predictors of Automatic Word and Sign Recognition
In previous studies, evidence concerning the extent of automatic word recognition in deaf children and the influence of language fluency on word and sign recognition (as indexed by the Stroop task) has been contradictory. This study examined the effects of English and sign language fluency in the au...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | American annals of the deaf (Washington, D.C. 1886) D.C. 1886), 1993-10, Vol.138 (4), p.370-375 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 375 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 4 |
| container_start_page | 370 |
| container_title | American annals of the deaf (Washington, D.C. 1886) |
| container_volume | 138 |
| creator | Marschark, Marc Shroyer, Edgar H. |
| description | In previous studies, evidence concerning the extent of automatic word recognition in deaf children and the influence of language fluency on word and sign recognition (as indexed by the Stroop task) has been contradictory. This study examined the effects of English and sign language fluency in the automatic word and sign recognition of deaf and hearing adults. Results indicated that responding in sign took longer and created more Stroop interference than responding orally. Two groups of certified interpreters revealed this finding to be independent of hearing status. Most important, deaf subjects showed greater automaticity in recognizing signs than words, whereas hearing subjects showed greater automaticity in recognizing words than signs. This pattern was unaffected by language fluency. The findings clarify the results of previous studies both theoretically and methodologically. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1353/aad.2012.0381 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_76145765</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ericid>EJ472760</ericid><jstor_id>44392352</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>44392352</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c435t-6ea2a7b5b3cffc6e391b207153b9a0e7e63ff2c63608916559a0a1afc5c4d8e63</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkc1rFDEYh4Moda0evSkECt5mzXdmjqW0trKguIq9hUwmM2TZSWo-Dv3vzXSXLXjxFMjvyZv3fR8A3mO0xpTTz1oPa4IwWSPa4hdghTmjDaKSvwQrhBBpJBH3r8GblHYIYdwxfgbOWiKpRN0K3N9aHZ2f4DbrXBLUfoAb7aeiJwtv9sV68wh1gt-jHZzJISYYRnhZcph1dgb-DnF4erR1k4c_rAmTd9kF_xa8GvU-2XfH8xz8urn-eXXbbL59ubu63DSGUZ4bYTXRsuc9NeNohKUd7gmSmNO-08hKK-g4EiOoQG2HBef1VmM9Gm7Y0Nb0HHw61H2I4U-xKavZJWP3e-1tKElJgRmXgv8X5HUnjHBSwYt_wF0o0dchFKYYS8owY5VqDpSJIaVoR_UQ3azjo8JILWJUFaMWMWoRU_mPx6qln-1woo8mav7hkNvozCm9_sokkQLVmJ2a2lmT55Lsc1-05Qh1aru4X9R3lFXXSDz_ukvV3als7b8jtM76F05vqpc</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1311734144</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Hearing Status and Language Fluency as Predictors of Automatic Word and Sign Recognition</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Periodicals Index Online</source><source>JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing</source><creator>Marschark, Marc ; Shroyer, Edgar H.</creator><creatorcontrib>Marschark, Marc ; Shroyer, Edgar H.</creatorcontrib><description>In previous studies, evidence concerning the extent of automatic word recognition in deaf children and the influence of language fluency on word and sign recognition (as indexed by the Stroop task) has been contradictory. This study examined the effects of English and sign language fluency in the automatic word and sign recognition of deaf and hearing adults. Results indicated that responding in sign took longer and created more Stroop interference than responding orally. Two groups of certified interpreters revealed this finding to be independent of hearing status. Most important, deaf subjects showed greater automaticity in recognizing signs than words, whereas hearing subjects showed greater automaticity in recognizing words than signs. This pattern was unaffected by language fluency. The findings clarify the results of previous studies both theoretically and methodologically.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0002-726X</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1543-0375</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1543-0375</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1353/aad.2012.0381</identifier><identifier>PMID: 8273709</identifier><identifier>CODEN: ANDFAL</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Conference of Educational Administrators Serving the Deaf</publisher><subject>Adolescent ; Adults ; Auditory perception ; Automaticity ; Child ; Child, Preschool ; Children ; Deafness ; Female ; Humans ; Language ; Language Fluency ; Language Tests ; Language translation ; Male ; Mental Recall ; Predictor Variables ; Printing ; Reaction Time ; Sign Language ; Sign languages ; Stroop Color Word Test ; Stroop effect ; Student Reaction ; Vocabulary ; Word Recognition ; Words</subject><ispartof>American annals of the deaf (Washington, D.C. 1886), 1993-10, Vol.138 (4), p.370-375</ispartof><rights>1993 Conference of Educational Administrators Serving the Deaf</rights><rights>Copyright © Conference of Educational Administrators of Schools and Programs for the Deaf.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c435t-6ea2a7b5b3cffc6e391b207153b9a0e7e63ff2c63608916559a0a1afc5c4d8e63</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/44392352$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/44392352$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,803,27869,27924,27925,58017,58250</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/detail?accno=EJ472760$$DView record in ERIC$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8273709$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Marschark, Marc</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shroyer, Edgar H.</creatorcontrib><title>Hearing Status and Language Fluency as Predictors of Automatic Word and Sign Recognition</title><title>American annals of the deaf (Washington, D.C. 1886)</title><addtitle>Am Ann Deaf</addtitle><description>In previous studies, evidence concerning the extent of automatic word recognition in deaf children and the influence of language fluency on word and sign recognition (as indexed by the Stroop task) has been contradictory. This study examined the effects of English and sign language fluency in the automatic word and sign recognition of deaf and hearing adults. Results indicated that responding in sign took longer and created more Stroop interference than responding orally. Two groups of certified interpreters revealed this finding to be independent of hearing status. Most important, deaf subjects showed greater automaticity in recognizing signs than words, whereas hearing subjects showed greater automaticity in recognizing words than signs. This pattern was unaffected by language fluency. The findings clarify the results of previous studies both theoretically and methodologically.</description><subject>Adolescent</subject><subject>Adults</subject><subject>Auditory perception</subject><subject>Automaticity</subject><subject>Child</subject><subject>Child, Preschool</subject><subject>Children</subject><subject>Deafness</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Language</subject><subject>Language Fluency</subject><subject>Language Tests</subject><subject>Language translation</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Mental Recall</subject><subject>Predictor Variables</subject><subject>Printing</subject><subject>Reaction Time</subject><subject>Sign Language</subject><subject>Sign languages</subject><subject>Stroop Color Word Test</subject><subject>Stroop effect</subject><subject>Student Reaction</subject><subject>Vocabulary</subject><subject>Word Recognition</subject><subject>Words</subject><issn>0002-726X</issn><issn>1543-0375</issn><issn>1543-0375</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1993</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>K30</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkc1rFDEYh4Moda0evSkECt5mzXdmjqW0trKguIq9hUwmM2TZSWo-Dv3vzXSXLXjxFMjvyZv3fR8A3mO0xpTTz1oPa4IwWSPa4hdghTmjDaKSvwQrhBBpJBH3r8GblHYIYdwxfgbOWiKpRN0K3N9aHZ2f4DbrXBLUfoAb7aeiJwtv9sV68wh1gt-jHZzJISYYRnhZcph1dgb-DnF4erR1k4c_rAmTd9kF_xa8GvU-2XfH8xz8urn-eXXbbL59ubu63DSGUZ4bYTXRsuc9NeNohKUd7gmSmNO-08hKK-g4EiOoQG2HBef1VmM9Gm7Y0Nb0HHw61H2I4U-xKavZJWP3e-1tKElJgRmXgv8X5HUnjHBSwYt_wF0o0dchFKYYS8owY5VqDpSJIaVoR_UQ3azjo8JILWJUFaMWMWoRU_mPx6qln-1woo8mav7hkNvozCm9_sokkQLVmJ2a2lmT55Lsc1-05Qh1aru4X9R3lFXXSDz_ukvV3als7b8jtM76F05vqpc</recordid><startdate>19931001</startdate><enddate>19931001</enddate><creator>Marschark, Marc</creator><creator>Shroyer, Edgar H.</creator><general>Conference of Educational Administrators Serving the Deaf</general><general>Gallaudet University Press</general><general>Executive Committee of the Convention of American Instructors of the Deaf</general><scope>7SW</scope><scope>BJH</scope><scope>BNH</scope><scope>BNI</scope><scope>BNJ</scope><scope>BNO</scope><scope>ERI</scope><scope>PET</scope><scope>REK</scope><scope>WWN</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>IZSXY</scope><scope>K30</scope><scope>PAAUG</scope><scope>PAWHS</scope><scope>PAWZZ</scope><scope>PAXOH</scope><scope>PBHAV</scope><scope>PBQSW</scope><scope>PBYQZ</scope><scope>PCIWU</scope><scope>PCMID</scope><scope>PCZJX</scope><scope>PDGRG</scope><scope>PDWWI</scope><scope>PETMR</scope><scope>PFVGT</scope><scope>PGXDX</scope><scope>PIHIL</scope><scope>PISVA</scope><scope>PJCTQ</scope><scope>PJTMS</scope><scope>PLCHJ</scope><scope>PMHAD</scope><scope>PNQDJ</scope><scope>POUND</scope><scope>PPLAD</scope><scope>PQAPC</scope><scope>PQCAN</scope><scope>PQCMW</scope><scope>PQEME</scope><scope>PQHKH</scope><scope>PQMID</scope><scope>PQNCT</scope><scope>PQNET</scope><scope>PQSCT</scope><scope>PQSET</scope><scope>PSVJG</scope><scope>PVMQY</scope><scope>PZGFC</scope><scope>7T9</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>8BM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19931001</creationdate><title>Hearing Status and Language Fluency as Predictors of Automatic Word and Sign Recognition</title><author>Marschark, Marc ; Shroyer, Edgar H.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c435t-6ea2a7b5b3cffc6e391b207153b9a0e7e63ff2c63608916559a0a1afc5c4d8e63</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1993</creationdate><topic>Adolescent</topic><topic>Adults</topic><topic>Auditory perception</topic><topic>Automaticity</topic><topic>Child</topic><topic>Child, Preschool</topic><topic>Children</topic><topic>Deafness</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Language</topic><topic>Language Fluency</topic><topic>Language Tests</topic><topic>Language translation</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Mental Recall</topic><topic>Predictor Variables</topic><topic>Printing</topic><topic>Reaction Time</topic><topic>Sign Language</topic><topic>Sign languages</topic><topic>Stroop Color Word Test</topic><topic>Stroop effect</topic><topic>Student Reaction</topic><topic>Vocabulary</topic><topic>Word Recognition</topic><topic>Words</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Marschark, Marc</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shroyer, Edgar H.</creatorcontrib><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Ovid)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>ERIC( SilverPlatter )</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC PlusText (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>Education Resources Information Center (ERIC)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 30</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - West</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - MEA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - West</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segments 1-50</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - MEA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - West</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - MEA</collection><collection>Linguistics and Language Behavior Abstracts (LLBA)</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>ComDisDome</collection><jtitle>American annals of the deaf (Washington, D.C. 1886)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Marschark, Marc</au><au>Shroyer, Edgar H.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><ericid>EJ472760</ericid><atitle>Hearing Status and Language Fluency as Predictors of Automatic Word and Sign Recognition</atitle><jtitle>American annals of the deaf (Washington, D.C. 1886)</jtitle><addtitle>Am Ann Deaf</addtitle><date>1993-10-01</date><risdate>1993</risdate><volume>138</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>370</spage><epage>375</epage><pages>370-375</pages><issn>0002-726X</issn><issn>1543-0375</issn><eissn>1543-0375</eissn><coden>ANDFAL</coden><abstract>In previous studies, evidence concerning the extent of automatic word recognition in deaf children and the influence of language fluency on word and sign recognition (as indexed by the Stroop task) has been contradictory. This study examined the effects of English and sign language fluency in the automatic word and sign recognition of deaf and hearing adults. Results indicated that responding in sign took longer and created more Stroop interference than responding orally. Two groups of certified interpreters revealed this finding to be independent of hearing status. Most important, deaf subjects showed greater automaticity in recognizing signs than words, whereas hearing subjects showed greater automaticity in recognizing words than signs. This pattern was unaffected by language fluency. The findings clarify the results of previous studies both theoretically and methodologically.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Conference of Educational Administrators Serving the Deaf</pub><pmid>8273709</pmid><doi>10.1353/aad.2012.0381</doi><tpages>6</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0002-726X |
| ispartof | American annals of the deaf (Washington, D.C. 1886), 1993-10, Vol.138 (4), p.370-375 |
| issn | 0002-726X 1543-0375 1543-0375 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_76145765 |
| source | MEDLINE; Periodicals Index Online; JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing |
| subjects | Adolescent Adults Auditory perception Automaticity Child Child, Preschool Children Deafness Female Humans Language Language Fluency Language Tests Language translation Male Mental Recall Predictor Variables Printing Reaction Time Sign Language Sign languages Stroop Color Word Test Stroop effect Student Reaction Vocabulary Word Recognition Words |
| title | Hearing Status and Language Fluency as Predictors of Automatic Word and Sign Recognition |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-08T00%3A45%3A06IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Hearing%20Status%20and%20Language%20Fluency%20as%20Predictors%20of%20Automatic%20Word%20and%20Sign%20Recognition&rft.jtitle=American%20annals%20of%20the%20deaf%20(Washington,%20D.C.%201886)&rft.au=Marschark,%20Marc&rft.date=1993-10-01&rft.volume=138&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=370&rft.epage=375&rft.pages=370-375&rft.issn=0002-726X&rft.eissn=1543-0375&rft.coden=ANDFAL&rft_id=info:doi/10.1353/aad.2012.0381&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E44392352%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1311734144&rft_id=info:pmid/8273709&rft_ericid=EJ472760&rft_jstor_id=44392352&rfr_iscdi=true |