Growth, nitrogen metabolism, and cardiac responses to clenbuterol and ketoclenbuterol in rats and underfed cattle

Two beta-adrenoceptor agonists, clenbuterol and ketoclenbuterol, were examined for their effects on growth and cardiac tissue. In female rats, clenbuterol caused a 48% increase in weight gain (P < .05), with improved feed efficiency (26%; P < .1) and increased muscle mass (9%; P < .1). Keto...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of animal science 1993-11, Vol.71 (11), p.2942-2951
Hauptverfasser: Sillence, M. N, Hunter, R. A, Pegg, G. G, Brown, L, Matthews, M. L, Magner, T, Sleeman, M, Lindsay, D. B
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 2951
container_issue 11
container_start_page 2942
container_title Journal of animal science
container_volume 71
creator Sillence, M. N
Hunter, R. A
Pegg, G. G
Brown, L
Matthews, M. L
Magner, T
Sleeman, M
Lindsay, D. B
description Two beta-adrenoceptor agonists, clenbuterol and ketoclenbuterol, were examined for their effects on growth and cardiac tissue. In female rats, clenbuterol caused a 48% increase in weight gain (P < .05), with improved feed efficiency (26%; P < .1) and increased muscle mass (9%; P < .1). Ketoclenbuterol had less effect on weight gain (30%) and feed efficiency (16%) and did not increase muscle mass. Next we studied the adverse cardiovascular effects of these compounds. Neither drug increased the force of contraction of isolated rat ventricular papillary muscle. Clenbuterol was potent at causing an increase in the rate of contraction of isolated rat atria, and when fed to cattle over 2 d, the drug caused heart rate to increase by 92 to 117%. In contrast, ketoclenbuterol was not a potent stimulator of atrial rate in the rat, and in cattle it caused a smaller increase in heart rate than clenbuterol (12 to 27%). Finally, cattle that were underfed to simulate dry-season tropical pasture conditions were treated with clenbuterol or ketoclenbuterol for 35 d. Ketoclenbuterol caused no beneficial changes in N metabolism. The results obtained with clenbuterol were equivocal, and might have been confounded partly by the refusal of some treated animals to eat all the feed offered. Although clenbuterol did not cause a reduction in total urinary N output relative to control animals, marked reductions in plasma urea concentrations and in urea synthesis were observed (23 to 53%; P < .001). We conclude that ketoclenbuterol is not effective for attenuation of dry-season protein loss in cattle. Clenbuterol seems to be less effective in underfed cattle than in well-fed cattle, and further evidence is required to judge whether compounds of this nature are likely to benefit tropical cattle under harsh grazing conditions.
doi_str_mv 10.2527/1993.71112942x
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_76133147</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>7210056</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c349t-78b4e00cd93aa6a6209077fb17f0dfde35124e192248d295224fff7946b3b9eb3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdkUFP3DAQha0KBFvotTekiEO5bBaPncTxEa0KrYTEBc6Wk4zZbB1713a08O-bZVeo6mmked-8Gc0j5DvQBSuZuAUp-UIAAJMFe_tCZlCyMudQ8RMyo5RBXtfAzsnXGNeUAitleUbOhKS8qooZ2T4Ev0ureeb6FPwrumzApBtv-zjMM-26rNWh63WbBYwb7yLGLPmsteiaMWHw9gP6g8n_2-tdFnSKH9roOgwG904pWbwkp0bbiN-O9YK83P98Xv7KH58efi_vHvOWFzLlom4KpLTtJNe60hWjkgphGhCGdqZDXgIrECRjRd0xWU7VGCNkUTW8kdjwC_Lj4LsJfjtiTGroY4vWaod-jEpUwDkUYgKv_wPXfgxuuk0xqAH4tGiCFgeoDT7GgEZtQj_o8K6Aqn0Qah-E-gxiGrg6uo7NgN0nfvz8pN8c9FX_utr1AVUctLUTDWqtowAFoPZW_C9pnZE_</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>218113124</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Growth, nitrogen metabolism, and cardiac responses to clenbuterol and ketoclenbuterol in rats and underfed cattle</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Sillence, M. N ; Hunter, R. A ; Pegg, G. G ; Brown, L ; Matthews, M. L ; Magner, T ; Sleeman, M ; Lindsay, D. B</creator><creatorcontrib>Sillence, M. N ; Hunter, R. A ; Pegg, G. G ; Brown, L ; Matthews, M. L ; Magner, T ; Sleeman, M ; Lindsay, D. B</creatorcontrib><description>Two beta-adrenoceptor agonists, clenbuterol and ketoclenbuterol, were examined for their effects on growth and cardiac tissue. In female rats, clenbuterol caused a 48% increase in weight gain (P &lt; .05), with improved feed efficiency (26%; P &lt; .1) and increased muscle mass (9%; P &lt; .1). Ketoclenbuterol had less effect on weight gain (30%) and feed efficiency (16%) and did not increase muscle mass. Next we studied the adverse cardiovascular effects of these compounds. Neither drug increased the force of contraction of isolated rat ventricular papillary muscle. Clenbuterol was potent at causing an increase in the rate of contraction of isolated rat atria, and when fed to cattle over 2 d, the drug caused heart rate to increase by 92 to 117%. In contrast, ketoclenbuterol was not a potent stimulator of atrial rate in the rat, and in cattle it caused a smaller increase in heart rate than clenbuterol (12 to 27%). Finally, cattle that were underfed to simulate dry-season tropical pasture conditions were treated with clenbuterol or ketoclenbuterol for 35 d. Ketoclenbuterol caused no beneficial changes in N metabolism. The results obtained with clenbuterol were equivocal, and might have been confounded partly by the refusal of some treated animals to eat all the feed offered. Although clenbuterol did not cause a reduction in total urinary N output relative to control animals, marked reductions in plasma urea concentrations and in urea synthesis were observed (23 to 53%; P &lt; .001). We conclude that ketoclenbuterol is not effective for attenuation of dry-season protein loss in cattle. Clenbuterol seems to be less effective in underfed cattle than in well-fed cattle, and further evidence is required to judge whether compounds of this nature are likely to benefit tropical cattle under harsh grazing conditions.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0021-8812</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1525-3163</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.2527/1993.71112942x</identifier><identifier>PMID: 7903664</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Am Soc Animal Sci</publisher><subject>Adrenergic beta-Agonists - pharmacology ; Animals ; Cattle ; Cattle - metabolism ; Cattle - physiology ; Clenbuterol - analogs &amp; derivatives ; Clenbuterol - pharmacology ; Eating - drug effects ; Fatty Acids, Nonesterified - blood ; Female ; Food Deprivation - physiology ; Heart ; Heart - drug effects ; Heart Rate - drug effects ; Male ; Metabolism ; Nitrogen - metabolism ; Physical growth ; Rats ; Rats, Wistar ; Rodents ; Urea - blood ; Weight Gain - drug effects</subject><ispartof>Journal of animal science, 1993-11, Vol.71 (11), p.2942-2951</ispartof><rights>Copyright American Society of Animal Science Nov 1993</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c349t-78b4e00cd93aa6a6209077fb17f0dfde35124e192248d295224fff7946b3b9eb3</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/7903664$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Sillence, M. N</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hunter, R. A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pegg, G. G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brown, L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Matthews, M. L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Magner, T</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sleeman, M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lindsay, D. B</creatorcontrib><title>Growth, nitrogen metabolism, and cardiac responses to clenbuterol and ketoclenbuterol in rats and underfed cattle</title><title>Journal of animal science</title><addtitle>J Anim Sci</addtitle><description>Two beta-adrenoceptor agonists, clenbuterol and ketoclenbuterol, were examined for their effects on growth and cardiac tissue. In female rats, clenbuterol caused a 48% increase in weight gain (P &lt; .05), with improved feed efficiency (26%; P &lt; .1) and increased muscle mass (9%; P &lt; .1). Ketoclenbuterol had less effect on weight gain (30%) and feed efficiency (16%) and did not increase muscle mass. Next we studied the adverse cardiovascular effects of these compounds. Neither drug increased the force of contraction of isolated rat ventricular papillary muscle. Clenbuterol was potent at causing an increase in the rate of contraction of isolated rat atria, and when fed to cattle over 2 d, the drug caused heart rate to increase by 92 to 117%. In contrast, ketoclenbuterol was not a potent stimulator of atrial rate in the rat, and in cattle it caused a smaller increase in heart rate than clenbuterol (12 to 27%). Finally, cattle that were underfed to simulate dry-season tropical pasture conditions were treated with clenbuterol or ketoclenbuterol for 35 d. Ketoclenbuterol caused no beneficial changes in N metabolism. The results obtained with clenbuterol were equivocal, and might have been confounded partly by the refusal of some treated animals to eat all the feed offered. Although clenbuterol did not cause a reduction in total urinary N output relative to control animals, marked reductions in plasma urea concentrations and in urea synthesis were observed (23 to 53%; P &lt; .001). We conclude that ketoclenbuterol is not effective for attenuation of dry-season protein loss in cattle. Clenbuterol seems to be less effective in underfed cattle than in well-fed cattle, and further evidence is required to judge whether compounds of this nature are likely to benefit tropical cattle under harsh grazing conditions.</description><subject>Adrenergic beta-Agonists - pharmacology</subject><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Cattle</subject><subject>Cattle - metabolism</subject><subject>Cattle - physiology</subject><subject>Clenbuterol - analogs &amp; derivatives</subject><subject>Clenbuterol - pharmacology</subject><subject>Eating - drug effects</subject><subject>Fatty Acids, Nonesterified - blood</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Food Deprivation - physiology</subject><subject>Heart</subject><subject>Heart - drug effects</subject><subject>Heart Rate - drug effects</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Metabolism</subject><subject>Nitrogen - metabolism</subject><subject>Physical growth</subject><subject>Rats</subject><subject>Rats, Wistar</subject><subject>Rodents</subject><subject>Urea - blood</subject><subject>Weight Gain - drug effects</subject><issn>0021-8812</issn><issn>1525-3163</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1993</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNpdkUFP3DAQha0KBFvotTekiEO5bBaPncTxEa0KrYTEBc6Wk4zZbB1713a08O-bZVeo6mmked-8Gc0j5DvQBSuZuAUp-UIAAJMFe_tCZlCyMudQ8RMyo5RBXtfAzsnXGNeUAitleUbOhKS8qooZ2T4Ev0ureeb6FPwrumzApBtv-zjMM-26rNWh63WbBYwb7yLGLPmsteiaMWHw9gP6g8n_2-tdFnSKH9roOgwG904pWbwkp0bbiN-O9YK83P98Xv7KH58efi_vHvOWFzLlom4KpLTtJNe60hWjkgphGhCGdqZDXgIrECRjRd0xWU7VGCNkUTW8kdjwC_Lj4LsJfjtiTGroY4vWaod-jEpUwDkUYgKv_wPXfgxuuk0xqAH4tGiCFgeoDT7GgEZtQj_o8K6Aqn0Qah-E-gxiGrg6uo7NgN0nfvz8pN8c9FX_utr1AVUctLUTDWqtowAFoPZW_C9pnZE_</recordid><startdate>19931101</startdate><enddate>19931101</enddate><creator>Sillence, M. N</creator><creator>Hunter, R. A</creator><creator>Pegg, G. G</creator><creator>Brown, L</creator><creator>Matthews, M. L</creator><creator>Magner, T</creator><creator>Sleeman, M</creator><creator>Lindsay, D. B</creator><general>Am Soc Animal Sci</general><general>Oxford University Press</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>U9A</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19931101</creationdate><title>Growth, nitrogen metabolism, and cardiac responses to clenbuterol and ketoclenbuterol in rats and underfed cattle</title><author>Sillence, M. N ; Hunter, R. A ; Pegg, G. G ; Brown, L ; Matthews, M. L ; Magner, T ; Sleeman, M ; Lindsay, D. B</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c349t-78b4e00cd93aa6a6209077fb17f0dfde35124e192248d295224fff7946b3b9eb3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1993</creationdate><topic>Adrenergic beta-Agonists - pharmacology</topic><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Cattle</topic><topic>Cattle - metabolism</topic><topic>Cattle - physiology</topic><topic>Clenbuterol - analogs &amp; derivatives</topic><topic>Clenbuterol - pharmacology</topic><topic>Eating - drug effects</topic><topic>Fatty Acids, Nonesterified - blood</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Food Deprivation - physiology</topic><topic>Heart</topic><topic>Heart - drug effects</topic><topic>Heart Rate - drug effects</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Metabolism</topic><topic>Nitrogen - metabolism</topic><topic>Physical growth</topic><topic>Rats</topic><topic>Rats, Wistar</topic><topic>Rodents</topic><topic>Urea - blood</topic><topic>Weight Gain - drug effects</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Sillence, M. N</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hunter, R. A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pegg, G. G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brown, L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Matthews, M. L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Magner, T</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sleeman, M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lindsay, D. B</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of animal science</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Sillence, M. N</au><au>Hunter, R. A</au><au>Pegg, G. G</au><au>Brown, L</au><au>Matthews, M. L</au><au>Magner, T</au><au>Sleeman, M</au><au>Lindsay, D. B</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Growth, nitrogen metabolism, and cardiac responses to clenbuterol and ketoclenbuterol in rats and underfed cattle</atitle><jtitle>Journal of animal science</jtitle><addtitle>J Anim Sci</addtitle><date>1993-11-01</date><risdate>1993</risdate><volume>71</volume><issue>11</issue><spage>2942</spage><epage>2951</epage><pages>2942-2951</pages><issn>0021-8812</issn><eissn>1525-3163</eissn><abstract>Two beta-adrenoceptor agonists, clenbuterol and ketoclenbuterol, were examined for their effects on growth and cardiac tissue. In female rats, clenbuterol caused a 48% increase in weight gain (P &lt; .05), with improved feed efficiency (26%; P &lt; .1) and increased muscle mass (9%; P &lt; .1). Ketoclenbuterol had less effect on weight gain (30%) and feed efficiency (16%) and did not increase muscle mass. Next we studied the adverse cardiovascular effects of these compounds. Neither drug increased the force of contraction of isolated rat ventricular papillary muscle. Clenbuterol was potent at causing an increase in the rate of contraction of isolated rat atria, and when fed to cattle over 2 d, the drug caused heart rate to increase by 92 to 117%. In contrast, ketoclenbuterol was not a potent stimulator of atrial rate in the rat, and in cattle it caused a smaller increase in heart rate than clenbuterol (12 to 27%). Finally, cattle that were underfed to simulate dry-season tropical pasture conditions were treated with clenbuterol or ketoclenbuterol for 35 d. Ketoclenbuterol caused no beneficial changes in N metabolism. The results obtained with clenbuterol were equivocal, and might have been confounded partly by the refusal of some treated animals to eat all the feed offered. Although clenbuterol did not cause a reduction in total urinary N output relative to control animals, marked reductions in plasma urea concentrations and in urea synthesis were observed (23 to 53%; P &lt; .001). We conclude that ketoclenbuterol is not effective for attenuation of dry-season protein loss in cattle. Clenbuterol seems to be less effective in underfed cattle than in well-fed cattle, and further evidence is required to judge whether compounds of this nature are likely to benefit tropical cattle under harsh grazing conditions.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Am Soc Animal Sci</pub><pmid>7903664</pmid><doi>10.2527/1993.71112942x</doi><tpages>10</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0021-8812
ispartof Journal of animal science, 1993-11, Vol.71 (11), p.2942-2951
issn 0021-8812
1525-3163
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_76133147
source MEDLINE; Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects Adrenergic beta-Agonists - pharmacology
Animals
Cattle
Cattle - metabolism
Cattle - physiology
Clenbuterol - analogs & derivatives
Clenbuterol - pharmacology
Eating - drug effects
Fatty Acids, Nonesterified - blood
Female
Food Deprivation - physiology
Heart
Heart - drug effects
Heart Rate - drug effects
Male
Metabolism
Nitrogen - metabolism
Physical growth
Rats
Rats, Wistar
Rodents
Urea - blood
Weight Gain - drug effects
title Growth, nitrogen metabolism, and cardiac responses to clenbuterol and ketoclenbuterol in rats and underfed cattle
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-21T22%3A05%3A32IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Growth,%20nitrogen%20metabolism,%20and%20cardiac%20responses%20to%20clenbuterol%20and%20ketoclenbuterol%20in%20rats%20and%20underfed%20cattle&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20animal%20science&rft.au=Sillence,%20M.%20N&rft.date=1993-11-01&rft.volume=71&rft.issue=11&rft.spage=2942&rft.epage=2951&rft.pages=2942-2951&rft.issn=0021-8812&rft.eissn=1525-3163&rft_id=info:doi/10.2527/1993.71112942x&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E7210056%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=218113124&rft_id=info:pmid/7903664&rfr_iscdi=true