Growth, nitrogen metabolism, and cardiac responses to clenbuterol and ketoclenbuterol in rats and underfed cattle
Two beta-adrenoceptor agonists, clenbuterol and ketoclenbuterol, were examined for their effects on growth and cardiac tissue. In female rats, clenbuterol caused a 48% increase in weight gain (P < .05), with improved feed efficiency (26%; P < .1) and increased muscle mass (9%; P < .1). Keto...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of animal science 1993-11, Vol.71 (11), p.2942-2951 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 2951 |
---|---|
container_issue | 11 |
container_start_page | 2942 |
container_title | Journal of animal science |
container_volume | 71 |
creator | Sillence, M. N Hunter, R. A Pegg, G. G Brown, L Matthews, M. L Magner, T Sleeman, M Lindsay, D. B |
description | Two beta-adrenoceptor agonists, clenbuterol and ketoclenbuterol, were examined for their effects on growth and cardiac tissue. In female rats, clenbuterol caused a 48% increase in weight gain (P < .05), with improved feed efficiency (26%; P < .1) and increased muscle mass (9%; P < .1). Ketoclenbuterol had less effect on weight gain (30%) and feed efficiency (16%) and did not increase muscle mass. Next we studied the adverse cardiovascular effects of these compounds. Neither drug increased the force of contraction of isolated rat ventricular papillary muscle. Clenbuterol was potent at causing an increase in the rate of contraction of isolated rat atria, and when fed to cattle over 2 d, the drug caused heart rate to increase by 92 to 117%. In contrast, ketoclenbuterol was not a potent stimulator of atrial rate in the rat, and in cattle it caused a smaller increase in heart rate than clenbuterol (12 to 27%). Finally, cattle that were underfed to simulate dry-season tropical pasture conditions were treated with clenbuterol or ketoclenbuterol for 35 d. Ketoclenbuterol caused no beneficial changes in N metabolism. The results obtained with clenbuterol were equivocal, and might have been confounded partly by the refusal of some treated animals to eat all the feed offered. Although clenbuterol did not cause a reduction in total urinary N output relative to control animals, marked reductions in plasma urea concentrations and in urea synthesis were observed (23 to 53%; P < .001). We conclude that ketoclenbuterol is not effective for attenuation of dry-season protein loss in cattle. Clenbuterol seems to be less effective in underfed cattle than in well-fed cattle, and further evidence is required to judge whether compounds of this nature are likely to benefit tropical cattle under harsh grazing conditions. |
doi_str_mv | 10.2527/1993.71112942x |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_76133147</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>7210056</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c349t-78b4e00cd93aa6a6209077fb17f0dfde35124e192248d295224fff7946b3b9eb3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdkUFP3DAQha0KBFvotTekiEO5bBaPncTxEa0KrYTEBc6Wk4zZbB1713a08O-bZVeo6mmked-8Gc0j5DvQBSuZuAUp-UIAAJMFe_tCZlCyMudQ8RMyo5RBXtfAzsnXGNeUAitleUbOhKS8qooZ2T4Ev0ureeb6FPwrumzApBtv-zjMM-26rNWh63WbBYwb7yLGLPmsteiaMWHw9gP6g8n_2-tdFnSKH9roOgwG904pWbwkp0bbiN-O9YK83P98Xv7KH58efi_vHvOWFzLlom4KpLTtJNe60hWjkgphGhCGdqZDXgIrECRjRd0xWU7VGCNkUTW8kdjwC_Lj4LsJfjtiTGroY4vWaod-jEpUwDkUYgKv_wPXfgxuuk0xqAH4tGiCFgeoDT7GgEZtQj_o8K6Aqn0Qah-E-gxiGrg6uo7NgN0nfvz8pN8c9FX_utr1AVUctLUTDWqtowAFoPZW_C9pnZE_</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>218113124</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Growth, nitrogen metabolism, and cardiac responses to clenbuterol and ketoclenbuterol in rats and underfed cattle</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Sillence, M. N ; Hunter, R. A ; Pegg, G. G ; Brown, L ; Matthews, M. L ; Magner, T ; Sleeman, M ; Lindsay, D. B</creator><creatorcontrib>Sillence, M. N ; Hunter, R. A ; Pegg, G. G ; Brown, L ; Matthews, M. L ; Magner, T ; Sleeman, M ; Lindsay, D. B</creatorcontrib><description>Two beta-adrenoceptor agonists, clenbuterol and ketoclenbuterol, were examined for their effects on growth and cardiac tissue. In female rats, clenbuterol caused a 48% increase in weight gain (P < .05), with improved feed efficiency (26%; P < .1) and increased muscle mass (9%; P < .1). Ketoclenbuterol had less effect on weight gain (30%) and feed efficiency (16%) and did not increase muscle mass. Next we studied the adverse cardiovascular effects of these compounds. Neither drug increased the force of contraction of isolated rat ventricular papillary muscle. Clenbuterol was potent at causing an increase in the rate of contraction of isolated rat atria, and when fed to cattle over 2 d, the drug caused heart rate to increase by 92 to 117%. In contrast, ketoclenbuterol was not a potent stimulator of atrial rate in the rat, and in cattle it caused a smaller increase in heart rate than clenbuterol (12 to 27%). Finally, cattle that were underfed to simulate dry-season tropical pasture conditions were treated with clenbuterol or ketoclenbuterol for 35 d. Ketoclenbuterol caused no beneficial changes in N metabolism. The results obtained with clenbuterol were equivocal, and might have been confounded partly by the refusal of some treated animals to eat all the feed offered. Although clenbuterol did not cause a reduction in total urinary N output relative to control animals, marked reductions in plasma urea concentrations and in urea synthesis were observed (23 to 53%; P < .001). We conclude that ketoclenbuterol is not effective for attenuation of dry-season protein loss in cattle. Clenbuterol seems to be less effective in underfed cattle than in well-fed cattle, and further evidence is required to judge whether compounds of this nature are likely to benefit tropical cattle under harsh grazing conditions.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0021-8812</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1525-3163</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.2527/1993.71112942x</identifier><identifier>PMID: 7903664</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Am Soc Animal Sci</publisher><subject>Adrenergic beta-Agonists - pharmacology ; Animals ; Cattle ; Cattle - metabolism ; Cattle - physiology ; Clenbuterol - analogs & derivatives ; Clenbuterol - pharmacology ; Eating - drug effects ; Fatty Acids, Nonesterified - blood ; Female ; Food Deprivation - physiology ; Heart ; Heart - drug effects ; Heart Rate - drug effects ; Male ; Metabolism ; Nitrogen - metabolism ; Physical growth ; Rats ; Rats, Wistar ; Rodents ; Urea - blood ; Weight Gain - drug effects</subject><ispartof>Journal of animal science, 1993-11, Vol.71 (11), p.2942-2951</ispartof><rights>Copyright American Society of Animal Science Nov 1993</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c349t-78b4e00cd93aa6a6209077fb17f0dfde35124e192248d295224fff7946b3b9eb3</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/7903664$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Sillence, M. N</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hunter, R. A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pegg, G. G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brown, L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Matthews, M. L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Magner, T</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sleeman, M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lindsay, D. B</creatorcontrib><title>Growth, nitrogen metabolism, and cardiac responses to clenbuterol and ketoclenbuterol in rats and underfed cattle</title><title>Journal of animal science</title><addtitle>J Anim Sci</addtitle><description>Two beta-adrenoceptor agonists, clenbuterol and ketoclenbuterol, were examined for their effects on growth and cardiac tissue. In female rats, clenbuterol caused a 48% increase in weight gain (P < .05), with improved feed efficiency (26%; P < .1) and increased muscle mass (9%; P < .1). Ketoclenbuterol had less effect on weight gain (30%) and feed efficiency (16%) and did not increase muscle mass. Next we studied the adverse cardiovascular effects of these compounds. Neither drug increased the force of contraction of isolated rat ventricular papillary muscle. Clenbuterol was potent at causing an increase in the rate of contraction of isolated rat atria, and when fed to cattle over 2 d, the drug caused heart rate to increase by 92 to 117%. In contrast, ketoclenbuterol was not a potent stimulator of atrial rate in the rat, and in cattle it caused a smaller increase in heart rate than clenbuterol (12 to 27%). Finally, cattle that were underfed to simulate dry-season tropical pasture conditions were treated with clenbuterol or ketoclenbuterol for 35 d. Ketoclenbuterol caused no beneficial changes in N metabolism. The results obtained with clenbuterol were equivocal, and might have been confounded partly by the refusal of some treated animals to eat all the feed offered. Although clenbuterol did not cause a reduction in total urinary N output relative to control animals, marked reductions in plasma urea concentrations and in urea synthesis were observed (23 to 53%; P < .001). We conclude that ketoclenbuterol is not effective for attenuation of dry-season protein loss in cattle. Clenbuterol seems to be less effective in underfed cattle than in well-fed cattle, and further evidence is required to judge whether compounds of this nature are likely to benefit tropical cattle under harsh grazing conditions.</description><subject>Adrenergic beta-Agonists - pharmacology</subject><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Cattle</subject><subject>Cattle - metabolism</subject><subject>Cattle - physiology</subject><subject>Clenbuterol - analogs & derivatives</subject><subject>Clenbuterol - pharmacology</subject><subject>Eating - drug effects</subject><subject>Fatty Acids, Nonesterified - blood</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Food Deprivation - physiology</subject><subject>Heart</subject><subject>Heart - drug effects</subject><subject>Heart Rate - drug effects</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Metabolism</subject><subject>Nitrogen - metabolism</subject><subject>Physical growth</subject><subject>Rats</subject><subject>Rats, Wistar</subject><subject>Rodents</subject><subject>Urea - blood</subject><subject>Weight Gain - drug effects</subject><issn>0021-8812</issn><issn>1525-3163</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1993</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNpdkUFP3DAQha0KBFvotTekiEO5bBaPncTxEa0KrYTEBc6Wk4zZbB1713a08O-bZVeo6mmked-8Gc0j5DvQBSuZuAUp-UIAAJMFe_tCZlCyMudQ8RMyo5RBXtfAzsnXGNeUAitleUbOhKS8qooZ2T4Ev0ureeb6FPwrumzApBtv-zjMM-26rNWh63WbBYwb7yLGLPmsteiaMWHw9gP6g8n_2-tdFnSKH9roOgwG904pWbwkp0bbiN-O9YK83P98Xv7KH58efi_vHvOWFzLlom4KpLTtJNe60hWjkgphGhCGdqZDXgIrECRjRd0xWU7VGCNkUTW8kdjwC_Lj4LsJfjtiTGroY4vWaod-jEpUwDkUYgKv_wPXfgxuuk0xqAH4tGiCFgeoDT7GgEZtQj_o8K6Aqn0Qah-E-gxiGrg6uo7NgN0nfvz8pN8c9FX_utr1AVUctLUTDWqtowAFoPZW_C9pnZE_</recordid><startdate>19931101</startdate><enddate>19931101</enddate><creator>Sillence, M. N</creator><creator>Hunter, R. A</creator><creator>Pegg, G. G</creator><creator>Brown, L</creator><creator>Matthews, M. L</creator><creator>Magner, T</creator><creator>Sleeman, M</creator><creator>Lindsay, D. B</creator><general>Am Soc Animal Sci</general><general>Oxford University Press</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>U9A</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19931101</creationdate><title>Growth, nitrogen metabolism, and cardiac responses to clenbuterol and ketoclenbuterol in rats and underfed cattle</title><author>Sillence, M. N ; Hunter, R. A ; Pegg, G. G ; Brown, L ; Matthews, M. L ; Magner, T ; Sleeman, M ; Lindsay, D. B</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c349t-78b4e00cd93aa6a6209077fb17f0dfde35124e192248d295224fff7946b3b9eb3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1993</creationdate><topic>Adrenergic beta-Agonists - pharmacology</topic><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Cattle</topic><topic>Cattle - metabolism</topic><topic>Cattle - physiology</topic><topic>Clenbuterol - analogs & derivatives</topic><topic>Clenbuterol - pharmacology</topic><topic>Eating - drug effects</topic><topic>Fatty Acids, Nonesterified - blood</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Food Deprivation - physiology</topic><topic>Heart</topic><topic>Heart - drug effects</topic><topic>Heart Rate - drug effects</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Metabolism</topic><topic>Nitrogen - metabolism</topic><topic>Physical growth</topic><topic>Rats</topic><topic>Rats, Wistar</topic><topic>Rodents</topic><topic>Urea - blood</topic><topic>Weight Gain - drug effects</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Sillence, M. N</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hunter, R. A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pegg, G. G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brown, L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Matthews, M. L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Magner, T</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sleeman, M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lindsay, D. B</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of animal science</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Sillence, M. N</au><au>Hunter, R. A</au><au>Pegg, G. G</au><au>Brown, L</au><au>Matthews, M. L</au><au>Magner, T</au><au>Sleeman, M</au><au>Lindsay, D. B</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Growth, nitrogen metabolism, and cardiac responses to clenbuterol and ketoclenbuterol in rats and underfed cattle</atitle><jtitle>Journal of animal science</jtitle><addtitle>J Anim Sci</addtitle><date>1993-11-01</date><risdate>1993</risdate><volume>71</volume><issue>11</issue><spage>2942</spage><epage>2951</epage><pages>2942-2951</pages><issn>0021-8812</issn><eissn>1525-3163</eissn><abstract>Two beta-adrenoceptor agonists, clenbuterol and ketoclenbuterol, were examined for their effects on growth and cardiac tissue. In female rats, clenbuterol caused a 48% increase in weight gain (P < .05), with improved feed efficiency (26%; P < .1) and increased muscle mass (9%; P < .1). Ketoclenbuterol had less effect on weight gain (30%) and feed efficiency (16%) and did not increase muscle mass. Next we studied the adverse cardiovascular effects of these compounds. Neither drug increased the force of contraction of isolated rat ventricular papillary muscle. Clenbuterol was potent at causing an increase in the rate of contraction of isolated rat atria, and when fed to cattle over 2 d, the drug caused heart rate to increase by 92 to 117%. In contrast, ketoclenbuterol was not a potent stimulator of atrial rate in the rat, and in cattle it caused a smaller increase in heart rate than clenbuterol (12 to 27%). Finally, cattle that were underfed to simulate dry-season tropical pasture conditions were treated with clenbuterol or ketoclenbuterol for 35 d. Ketoclenbuterol caused no beneficial changes in N metabolism. The results obtained with clenbuterol were equivocal, and might have been confounded partly by the refusal of some treated animals to eat all the feed offered. Although clenbuterol did not cause a reduction in total urinary N output relative to control animals, marked reductions in plasma urea concentrations and in urea synthesis were observed (23 to 53%; P < .001). We conclude that ketoclenbuterol is not effective for attenuation of dry-season protein loss in cattle. Clenbuterol seems to be less effective in underfed cattle than in well-fed cattle, and further evidence is required to judge whether compounds of this nature are likely to benefit tropical cattle under harsh grazing conditions.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Am Soc Animal Sci</pub><pmid>7903664</pmid><doi>10.2527/1993.71112942x</doi><tpages>10</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0021-8812 |
ispartof | Journal of animal science, 1993-11, Vol.71 (11), p.2942-2951 |
issn | 0021-8812 1525-3163 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_76133147 |
source | MEDLINE; Alma/SFX Local Collection |
subjects | Adrenergic beta-Agonists - pharmacology Animals Cattle Cattle - metabolism Cattle - physiology Clenbuterol - analogs & derivatives Clenbuterol - pharmacology Eating - drug effects Fatty Acids, Nonesterified - blood Female Food Deprivation - physiology Heart Heart - drug effects Heart Rate - drug effects Male Metabolism Nitrogen - metabolism Physical growth Rats Rats, Wistar Rodents Urea - blood Weight Gain - drug effects |
title | Growth, nitrogen metabolism, and cardiac responses to clenbuterol and ketoclenbuterol in rats and underfed cattle |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-21T22%3A05%3A32IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Growth,%20nitrogen%20metabolism,%20and%20cardiac%20responses%20to%20clenbuterol%20and%20ketoclenbuterol%20in%20rats%20and%20underfed%20cattle&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20animal%20science&rft.au=Sillence,%20M.%20N&rft.date=1993-11-01&rft.volume=71&rft.issue=11&rft.spage=2942&rft.epage=2951&rft.pages=2942-2951&rft.issn=0021-8812&rft.eissn=1525-3163&rft_id=info:doi/10.2527/1993.71112942x&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E7210056%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=218113124&rft_id=info:pmid/7903664&rfr_iscdi=true |