Integrated systems analysis of sow replacement rates in a hierarchical swine breeding structure
Sow replacement rates in a three-tiered breeding structure were investigated for a 10-yr planning horizon using a stochastic life-cycle swine production model. Market hogs were produced in a three-breed static crossing program and marketed on a liveweight basis. Growth and reproductive traits of ind...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of animal science 1993-11, Vol.71 (11), p.2885-2890 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 2890 |
---|---|
container_issue | 11 |
container_start_page | 2885 |
container_title | Journal of animal science |
container_volume | 71 |
creator | Faust, M.A Robison, O.W Tess, M.W |
description | Sow replacement rates in a three-tiered breeding structure were investigated for a 10-yr planning horizon using a stochastic life-cycle swine production model. Market hogs were produced in a three-breed static crossing program and marketed on a liveweight basis. Growth and reproductive traits of individual pigs were simulated using genetic, environmental, and economic parameters. Sows were culled after a maximum of 1, 5, or 10 parities. Systems were defined by maximum sow age at culling and included combinations of 1- and 5-parity nucleus and 1-, 5-, and 10-parity multiplier and commercial tiers. Economic response to index selection was considerable for all culling alternatives with yearly increases in system profits ranging from $1.06 to 1.44 for each commercial hog marketed. When sows were culled after one parity in nucleus, multiplier, and commercial tiers, respectively (1,1,1), annual changes in net returns and all cost measures were 40 to 50% larger than responses in systems with lower sow replacement rates. Based on 10-yr averages for net returns, systems with low multiplier- and commercial-level replacement rates were more profitable than systems with higher replacement rates. The most profitable system (5,10,10) differed from the least profitable system (1,1,1) by more than $10 per pig, but when the (1,1,1) system was excluded, the range was only $3 per pig. The system with lowest replacement rates supported 3,388 more multiplier and 34,151 more commercial sows from a 750-sow nucleus level than the (1,1,1) system. Output from the two extremes differed by 664,000 commercial market hogs sold. Greater benefit and larger tier sizes resulted from increasing maximum parity level from 1 to 5 than from increasing parity from 5 to 10 |
doi_str_mv | 10.2527/1993.71112885x |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_76125325</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>76125325</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c397t-67586d4a233671f36d671269ce06e63119e4a526c5cbd15fb21a92dc1d3a2e333</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdkc-rEzEQx4Moz2f16kEQgoieWjPJJrt7fDz88eCBB33nMM3Otin7o2Z2qf3vTWnpQRiYw3zyHeYTId6CWmmryy9Q12ZVAoCuKvv3mbgFq-3SgDPPxa1SGpZVBfqleMW8Uwq0re2NuKl0qSzArfAPw0SbhBM1ko88Uc8SB-yOHFmOreTxIBPtOwzU0zDJE8kyDhLlNlLCFLYxYCf5EAeS60TUxGEjeUpzmOZEr8WLFjumN5e-EE_fvv6-_7F8_Pn94f7ucRlMXU5LV9rKNQVqY1wJrXFNbtrVgZQjZwBqKtBqF2xYN2DbtQasdROgMajJGLMQn865-zT-mYkn30cO1HU40DizL10-3eRaiA__gbtxTvli9hoqMEaZE7Q6QyGNzIlav0-xx3T0oPxJuz9p91ft-cH7S-q87qm54hfPef7xMkfOutqEQ4h8xQpVWGVdxj6fsW3cbA8xkeceuy6Hgt8hl-AB_GljJt-dyRZHj5uUw55-1UWhIf_8P2GVnv0</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>218133035</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Integrated systems analysis of sow replacement rates in a hierarchical swine breeding structure</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Faust, M.A ; Robison, O.W ; Tess, M.W</creator><creatorcontrib>Faust, M.A ; Robison, O.W ; Tess, M.W</creatorcontrib><description>Sow replacement rates in a three-tiered breeding structure were investigated for a 10-yr planning horizon using a stochastic life-cycle swine production model. Market hogs were produced in a three-breed static crossing program and marketed on a liveweight basis. Growth and reproductive traits of individual pigs were simulated using genetic, environmental, and economic parameters. Sows were culled after a maximum of 1, 5, or 10 parities. Systems were defined by maximum sow age at culling and included combinations of 1- and 5-parity nucleus and 1-, 5-, and 10-parity multiplier and commercial tiers. Economic response to index selection was considerable for all culling alternatives with yearly increases in system profits ranging from $1.06 to 1.44 for each commercial hog marketed. When sows were culled after one parity in nucleus, multiplier, and commercial tiers, respectively (1,1,1), annual changes in net returns and all cost measures were 40 to 50% larger than responses in systems with lower sow replacement rates. Based on 10-yr averages for net returns, systems with low multiplier- and commercial-level replacement rates were more profitable than systems with higher replacement rates. The most profitable system (5,10,10) differed from the least profitable system (1,1,1) by more than $10 per pig, but when the (1,1,1) system was excluded, the range was only $3 per pig. The system with lowest replacement rates supported 3,388 more multiplier and 34,151 more commercial sows from a 750-sow nucleus level than the (1,1,1) system. Output from the two extremes differed by 664,000 commercial market hogs sold. Greater benefit and larger tier sizes resulted from increasing maximum parity level from 1 to 5 than from increasing parity from 5 to 10</description><identifier>ISSN: 0021-8812</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1525-3163</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.2527/1993.71112885x</identifier><identifier>PMID: 8270511</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Savoy, IL: Am Soc Animal Sci</publisher><subject>ANALISIS DE COSTOS ; ANALYSE DES COUTS ; Animals ; Biological and medical sciences ; Breeding - economics ; Breeding - methods ; Breeding of animals ; CERDAS ; Classical genetics, quantitative genetics, hybrids ; COMPORTAMIENTO ECONOMICO ; COMPORTEMENT ECONOMIQUE ; COSTOS DE PRODUCCION ; Costs and Cost Analysis ; COUT DE PRODUCTION ; CROISEMENT ; Crosses, Genetic ; CRUZAMIENTO ; Economics ; ELIMINACION ; Female ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; Genetics of eukaryotes. Biological and molecular evolution ; Hogs ; Income ; Male ; METHODE D'AMELIORATION ; METODOS DE MEJORAMIENTO ; MODELE DE SIMULATION ; MODELOS DE SIMULACION ; Models, Biological ; Parity ; REFORME ; Selection, Genetic ; Stochastic Processes ; Swine - genetics ; Swine - growth & development ; Systems Analysis ; TRUIE ; Vertebrata</subject><ispartof>Journal of animal science, 1993-11, Vol.71 (11), p.2885-2890</ispartof><rights>1994 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright American Society of Animal Science Nov 1993</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c397t-67586d4a233671f36d671269ce06e63119e4a526c5cbd15fb21a92dc1d3a2e333</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=4045056$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8270511$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Faust, M.A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Robison, O.W</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tess, M.W</creatorcontrib><title>Integrated systems analysis of sow replacement rates in a hierarchical swine breeding structure</title><title>Journal of animal science</title><addtitle>J Anim Sci</addtitle><description>Sow replacement rates in a three-tiered breeding structure were investigated for a 10-yr planning horizon using a stochastic life-cycle swine production model. Market hogs were produced in a three-breed static crossing program and marketed on a liveweight basis. Growth and reproductive traits of individual pigs were simulated using genetic, environmental, and economic parameters. Sows were culled after a maximum of 1, 5, or 10 parities. Systems were defined by maximum sow age at culling and included combinations of 1- and 5-parity nucleus and 1-, 5-, and 10-parity multiplier and commercial tiers. Economic response to index selection was considerable for all culling alternatives with yearly increases in system profits ranging from $1.06 to 1.44 for each commercial hog marketed. When sows were culled after one parity in nucleus, multiplier, and commercial tiers, respectively (1,1,1), annual changes in net returns and all cost measures were 40 to 50% larger than responses in systems with lower sow replacement rates. Based on 10-yr averages for net returns, systems with low multiplier- and commercial-level replacement rates were more profitable than systems with higher replacement rates. The most profitable system (5,10,10) differed from the least profitable system (1,1,1) by more than $10 per pig, but when the (1,1,1) system was excluded, the range was only $3 per pig. The system with lowest replacement rates supported 3,388 more multiplier and 34,151 more commercial sows from a 750-sow nucleus level than the (1,1,1) system. Output from the two extremes differed by 664,000 commercial market hogs sold. Greater benefit and larger tier sizes resulted from increasing maximum parity level from 1 to 5 than from increasing parity from 5 to 10</description><subject>ANALISIS DE COSTOS</subject><subject>ANALYSE DES COUTS</subject><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Breeding - economics</subject><subject>Breeding - methods</subject><subject>Breeding of animals</subject><subject>CERDAS</subject><subject>Classical genetics, quantitative genetics, hybrids</subject><subject>COMPORTAMIENTO ECONOMICO</subject><subject>COMPORTEMENT ECONOMIQUE</subject><subject>COSTOS DE PRODUCCION</subject><subject>Costs and Cost Analysis</subject><subject>COUT DE PRODUCTION</subject><subject>CROISEMENT</subject><subject>Crosses, Genetic</subject><subject>CRUZAMIENTO</subject><subject>Economics</subject><subject>ELIMINACION</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>Genetics of eukaryotes. Biological and molecular evolution</subject><subject>Hogs</subject><subject>Income</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>METHODE D'AMELIORATION</subject><subject>METODOS DE MEJORAMIENTO</subject><subject>MODELE DE SIMULATION</subject><subject>MODELOS DE SIMULACION</subject><subject>Models, Biological</subject><subject>Parity</subject><subject>REFORME</subject><subject>Selection, Genetic</subject><subject>Stochastic Processes</subject><subject>Swine - genetics</subject><subject>Swine - growth & development</subject><subject>Systems Analysis</subject><subject>TRUIE</subject><subject>Vertebrata</subject><issn>0021-8812</issn><issn>1525-3163</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1993</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNpdkc-rEzEQx4Moz2f16kEQgoieWjPJJrt7fDz88eCBB33nMM3Otin7o2Z2qf3vTWnpQRiYw3zyHeYTId6CWmmryy9Q12ZVAoCuKvv3mbgFq-3SgDPPxa1SGpZVBfqleMW8Uwq0re2NuKl0qSzArfAPw0SbhBM1ko88Uc8SB-yOHFmOreTxIBPtOwzU0zDJE8kyDhLlNlLCFLYxYCf5EAeS60TUxGEjeUpzmOZEr8WLFjumN5e-EE_fvv6-_7F8_Pn94f7ucRlMXU5LV9rKNQVqY1wJrXFNbtrVgZQjZwBqKtBqF2xYN2DbtQasdROgMajJGLMQn865-zT-mYkn30cO1HU40DizL10-3eRaiA__gbtxTvli9hoqMEaZE7Q6QyGNzIlav0-xx3T0oPxJuz9p91ft-cH7S-q87qm54hfPef7xMkfOutqEQ4h8xQpVWGVdxj6fsW3cbA8xkeceuy6Hgt8hl-AB_GljJt-dyRZHj5uUw55-1UWhIf_8P2GVnv0</recordid><startdate>19931101</startdate><enddate>19931101</enddate><creator>Faust, M.A</creator><creator>Robison, O.W</creator><creator>Tess, M.W</creator><general>Am Soc Animal Sci</general><general>American Society of Animal Science</general><general>Oxford University Press</general><scope>FBQ</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>U9A</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19931101</creationdate><title>Integrated systems analysis of sow replacement rates in a hierarchical swine breeding structure</title><author>Faust, M.A ; Robison, O.W ; Tess, M.W</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c397t-67586d4a233671f36d671269ce06e63119e4a526c5cbd15fb21a92dc1d3a2e333</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1993</creationdate><topic>ANALISIS DE COSTOS</topic><topic>ANALYSE DES COUTS</topic><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Breeding - economics</topic><topic>Breeding - methods</topic><topic>Breeding of animals</topic><topic>CERDAS</topic><topic>Classical genetics, quantitative genetics, hybrids</topic><topic>COMPORTAMIENTO ECONOMICO</topic><topic>COMPORTEMENT ECONOMIQUE</topic><topic>COSTOS DE PRODUCCION</topic><topic>Costs and Cost Analysis</topic><topic>COUT DE PRODUCTION</topic><topic>CROISEMENT</topic><topic>Crosses, Genetic</topic><topic>CRUZAMIENTO</topic><topic>Economics</topic><topic>ELIMINACION</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>Genetics of eukaryotes. Biological and molecular evolution</topic><topic>Hogs</topic><topic>Income</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>METHODE D'AMELIORATION</topic><topic>METODOS DE MEJORAMIENTO</topic><topic>MODELE DE SIMULATION</topic><topic>MODELOS DE SIMULACION</topic><topic>Models, Biological</topic><topic>Parity</topic><topic>REFORME</topic><topic>Selection, Genetic</topic><topic>Stochastic Processes</topic><topic>Swine - genetics</topic><topic>Swine - growth & development</topic><topic>Systems Analysis</topic><topic>TRUIE</topic><topic>Vertebrata</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Faust, M.A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Robison, O.W</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tess, M.W</creatorcontrib><collection>AGRIS</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of animal science</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Faust, M.A</au><au>Robison, O.W</au><au>Tess, M.W</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Integrated systems analysis of sow replacement rates in a hierarchical swine breeding structure</atitle><jtitle>Journal of animal science</jtitle><addtitle>J Anim Sci</addtitle><date>1993-11-01</date><risdate>1993</risdate><volume>71</volume><issue>11</issue><spage>2885</spage><epage>2890</epage><pages>2885-2890</pages><issn>0021-8812</issn><eissn>1525-3163</eissn><abstract>Sow replacement rates in a three-tiered breeding structure were investigated for a 10-yr planning horizon using a stochastic life-cycle swine production model. Market hogs were produced in a three-breed static crossing program and marketed on a liveweight basis. Growth and reproductive traits of individual pigs were simulated using genetic, environmental, and economic parameters. Sows were culled after a maximum of 1, 5, or 10 parities. Systems were defined by maximum sow age at culling and included combinations of 1- and 5-parity nucleus and 1-, 5-, and 10-parity multiplier and commercial tiers. Economic response to index selection was considerable for all culling alternatives with yearly increases in system profits ranging from $1.06 to 1.44 for each commercial hog marketed. When sows were culled after one parity in nucleus, multiplier, and commercial tiers, respectively (1,1,1), annual changes in net returns and all cost measures were 40 to 50% larger than responses in systems with lower sow replacement rates. Based on 10-yr averages for net returns, systems with low multiplier- and commercial-level replacement rates were more profitable than systems with higher replacement rates. The most profitable system (5,10,10) differed from the least profitable system (1,1,1) by more than $10 per pig, but when the (1,1,1) system was excluded, the range was only $3 per pig. The system with lowest replacement rates supported 3,388 more multiplier and 34,151 more commercial sows from a 750-sow nucleus level than the (1,1,1) system. Output from the two extremes differed by 664,000 commercial market hogs sold. Greater benefit and larger tier sizes resulted from increasing maximum parity level from 1 to 5 than from increasing parity from 5 to 10</abstract><cop>Savoy, IL</cop><pub>Am Soc Animal Sci</pub><pmid>8270511</pmid><doi>10.2527/1993.71112885x</doi><tpages>6</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0021-8812 |
ispartof | Journal of animal science, 1993-11, Vol.71 (11), p.2885-2890 |
issn | 0021-8812 1525-3163 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_76125325 |
source | MEDLINE; Alma/SFX Local Collection |
subjects | ANALISIS DE COSTOS ANALYSE DES COUTS Animals Biological and medical sciences Breeding - economics Breeding - methods Breeding of animals CERDAS Classical genetics, quantitative genetics, hybrids COMPORTAMIENTO ECONOMICO COMPORTEMENT ECONOMIQUE COSTOS DE PRODUCCION Costs and Cost Analysis COUT DE PRODUCTION CROISEMENT Crosses, Genetic CRUZAMIENTO Economics ELIMINACION Female Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology Genetics of eukaryotes. Biological and molecular evolution Hogs Income Male METHODE D'AMELIORATION METODOS DE MEJORAMIENTO MODELE DE SIMULATION MODELOS DE SIMULACION Models, Biological Parity REFORME Selection, Genetic Stochastic Processes Swine - genetics Swine - growth & development Systems Analysis TRUIE Vertebrata |
title | Integrated systems analysis of sow replacement rates in a hierarchical swine breeding structure |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-04T21%3A51%3A57IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Integrated%20systems%20analysis%20of%20sow%20replacement%20rates%20in%20a%20hierarchical%20swine%20breeding%20structure&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20animal%20science&rft.au=Faust,%20M.A&rft.date=1993-11-01&rft.volume=71&rft.issue=11&rft.spage=2885&rft.epage=2890&rft.pages=2885-2890&rft.issn=0021-8812&rft.eissn=1525-3163&rft_id=info:doi/10.2527/1993.71112885x&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E76125325%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=218133035&rft_id=info:pmid/8270511&rfr_iscdi=true |