Integrated systems analysis of sow replacement rates in a hierarchical swine breeding structure

Sow replacement rates in a three-tiered breeding structure were investigated for a 10-yr planning horizon using a stochastic life-cycle swine production model. Market hogs were produced in a three-breed static crossing program and marketed on a liveweight basis. Growth and reproductive traits of ind...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of animal science 1993-11, Vol.71 (11), p.2885-2890
Hauptverfasser: Faust, M.A, Robison, O.W, Tess, M.W
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 2890
container_issue 11
container_start_page 2885
container_title Journal of animal science
container_volume 71
creator Faust, M.A
Robison, O.W
Tess, M.W
description Sow replacement rates in a three-tiered breeding structure were investigated for a 10-yr planning horizon using a stochastic life-cycle swine production model. Market hogs were produced in a three-breed static crossing program and marketed on a liveweight basis. Growth and reproductive traits of individual pigs were simulated using genetic, environmental, and economic parameters. Sows were culled after a maximum of 1, 5, or 10 parities. Systems were defined by maximum sow age at culling and included combinations of 1- and 5-parity nucleus and 1-, 5-, and 10-parity multiplier and commercial tiers. Economic response to index selection was considerable for all culling alternatives with yearly increases in system profits ranging from $1.06 to 1.44 for each commercial hog marketed. When sows were culled after one parity in nucleus, multiplier, and commercial tiers, respectively (1,1,1), annual changes in net returns and all cost measures were 40 to 50% larger than responses in systems with lower sow replacement rates. Based on 10-yr averages for net returns, systems with low multiplier- and commercial-level replacement rates were more profitable than systems with higher replacement rates. The most profitable system (5,10,10) differed from the least profitable system (1,1,1) by more than $10 per pig, but when the (1,1,1) system was excluded, the range was only $3 per pig. The system with lowest replacement rates supported 3,388 more multiplier and 34,151 more commercial sows from a 750-sow nucleus level than the (1,1,1) system. Output from the two extremes differed by 664,000 commercial market hogs sold. Greater benefit and larger tier sizes resulted from increasing maximum parity level from 1 to 5 than from increasing parity from 5 to 10
doi_str_mv 10.2527/1993.71112885x
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_76125325</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>76125325</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c397t-67586d4a233671f36d671269ce06e63119e4a526c5cbd15fb21a92dc1d3a2e333</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdkc-rEzEQx4Moz2f16kEQgoieWjPJJrt7fDz88eCBB33nMM3Otin7o2Z2qf3vTWnpQRiYw3zyHeYTId6CWmmryy9Q12ZVAoCuKvv3mbgFq-3SgDPPxa1SGpZVBfqleMW8Uwq0re2NuKl0qSzArfAPw0SbhBM1ko88Uc8SB-yOHFmOreTxIBPtOwzU0zDJE8kyDhLlNlLCFLYxYCf5EAeS60TUxGEjeUpzmOZEr8WLFjumN5e-EE_fvv6-_7F8_Pn94f7ucRlMXU5LV9rKNQVqY1wJrXFNbtrVgZQjZwBqKtBqF2xYN2DbtQasdROgMajJGLMQn865-zT-mYkn30cO1HU40DizL10-3eRaiA__gbtxTvli9hoqMEaZE7Q6QyGNzIlav0-xx3T0oPxJuz9p91ft-cH7S-q87qm54hfPef7xMkfOutqEQ4h8xQpVWGVdxj6fsW3cbA8xkeceuy6Hgt8hl-AB_GljJt-dyRZHj5uUw55-1UWhIf_8P2GVnv0</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>218133035</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Integrated systems analysis of sow replacement rates in a hierarchical swine breeding structure</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Faust, M.A ; Robison, O.W ; Tess, M.W</creator><creatorcontrib>Faust, M.A ; Robison, O.W ; Tess, M.W</creatorcontrib><description>Sow replacement rates in a three-tiered breeding structure were investigated for a 10-yr planning horizon using a stochastic life-cycle swine production model. Market hogs were produced in a three-breed static crossing program and marketed on a liveweight basis. Growth and reproductive traits of individual pigs were simulated using genetic, environmental, and economic parameters. Sows were culled after a maximum of 1, 5, or 10 parities. Systems were defined by maximum sow age at culling and included combinations of 1- and 5-parity nucleus and 1-, 5-, and 10-parity multiplier and commercial tiers. Economic response to index selection was considerable for all culling alternatives with yearly increases in system profits ranging from $1.06 to 1.44 for each commercial hog marketed. When sows were culled after one parity in nucleus, multiplier, and commercial tiers, respectively (1,1,1), annual changes in net returns and all cost measures were 40 to 50% larger than responses in systems with lower sow replacement rates. Based on 10-yr averages for net returns, systems with low multiplier- and commercial-level replacement rates were more profitable than systems with higher replacement rates. The most profitable system (5,10,10) differed from the least profitable system (1,1,1) by more than $10 per pig, but when the (1,1,1) system was excluded, the range was only $3 per pig. The system with lowest replacement rates supported 3,388 more multiplier and 34,151 more commercial sows from a 750-sow nucleus level than the (1,1,1) system. Output from the two extremes differed by 664,000 commercial market hogs sold. Greater benefit and larger tier sizes resulted from increasing maximum parity level from 1 to 5 than from increasing parity from 5 to 10</description><identifier>ISSN: 0021-8812</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1525-3163</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.2527/1993.71112885x</identifier><identifier>PMID: 8270511</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Savoy, IL: Am Soc Animal Sci</publisher><subject>ANALISIS DE COSTOS ; ANALYSE DES COUTS ; Animals ; Biological and medical sciences ; Breeding - economics ; Breeding - methods ; Breeding of animals ; CERDAS ; Classical genetics, quantitative genetics, hybrids ; COMPORTAMIENTO ECONOMICO ; COMPORTEMENT ECONOMIQUE ; COSTOS DE PRODUCCION ; Costs and Cost Analysis ; COUT DE PRODUCTION ; CROISEMENT ; Crosses, Genetic ; CRUZAMIENTO ; Economics ; ELIMINACION ; Female ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; Genetics of eukaryotes. Biological and molecular evolution ; Hogs ; Income ; Male ; METHODE D'AMELIORATION ; METODOS DE MEJORAMIENTO ; MODELE DE SIMULATION ; MODELOS DE SIMULACION ; Models, Biological ; Parity ; REFORME ; Selection, Genetic ; Stochastic Processes ; Swine - genetics ; Swine - growth &amp; development ; Systems Analysis ; TRUIE ; Vertebrata</subject><ispartof>Journal of animal science, 1993-11, Vol.71 (11), p.2885-2890</ispartof><rights>1994 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright American Society of Animal Science Nov 1993</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c397t-67586d4a233671f36d671269ce06e63119e4a526c5cbd15fb21a92dc1d3a2e333</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=4045056$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8270511$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Faust, M.A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Robison, O.W</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tess, M.W</creatorcontrib><title>Integrated systems analysis of sow replacement rates in a hierarchical swine breeding structure</title><title>Journal of animal science</title><addtitle>J Anim Sci</addtitle><description>Sow replacement rates in a three-tiered breeding structure were investigated for a 10-yr planning horizon using a stochastic life-cycle swine production model. Market hogs were produced in a three-breed static crossing program and marketed on a liveweight basis. Growth and reproductive traits of individual pigs were simulated using genetic, environmental, and economic parameters. Sows were culled after a maximum of 1, 5, or 10 parities. Systems were defined by maximum sow age at culling and included combinations of 1- and 5-parity nucleus and 1-, 5-, and 10-parity multiplier and commercial tiers. Economic response to index selection was considerable for all culling alternatives with yearly increases in system profits ranging from $1.06 to 1.44 for each commercial hog marketed. When sows were culled after one parity in nucleus, multiplier, and commercial tiers, respectively (1,1,1), annual changes in net returns and all cost measures were 40 to 50% larger than responses in systems with lower sow replacement rates. Based on 10-yr averages for net returns, systems with low multiplier- and commercial-level replacement rates were more profitable than systems with higher replacement rates. The most profitable system (5,10,10) differed from the least profitable system (1,1,1) by more than $10 per pig, but when the (1,1,1) system was excluded, the range was only $3 per pig. The system with lowest replacement rates supported 3,388 more multiplier and 34,151 more commercial sows from a 750-sow nucleus level than the (1,1,1) system. Output from the two extremes differed by 664,000 commercial market hogs sold. Greater benefit and larger tier sizes resulted from increasing maximum parity level from 1 to 5 than from increasing parity from 5 to 10</description><subject>ANALISIS DE COSTOS</subject><subject>ANALYSE DES COUTS</subject><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Breeding - economics</subject><subject>Breeding - methods</subject><subject>Breeding of animals</subject><subject>CERDAS</subject><subject>Classical genetics, quantitative genetics, hybrids</subject><subject>COMPORTAMIENTO ECONOMICO</subject><subject>COMPORTEMENT ECONOMIQUE</subject><subject>COSTOS DE PRODUCCION</subject><subject>Costs and Cost Analysis</subject><subject>COUT DE PRODUCTION</subject><subject>CROISEMENT</subject><subject>Crosses, Genetic</subject><subject>CRUZAMIENTO</subject><subject>Economics</subject><subject>ELIMINACION</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>Genetics of eukaryotes. Biological and molecular evolution</subject><subject>Hogs</subject><subject>Income</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>METHODE D'AMELIORATION</subject><subject>METODOS DE MEJORAMIENTO</subject><subject>MODELE DE SIMULATION</subject><subject>MODELOS DE SIMULACION</subject><subject>Models, Biological</subject><subject>Parity</subject><subject>REFORME</subject><subject>Selection, Genetic</subject><subject>Stochastic Processes</subject><subject>Swine - genetics</subject><subject>Swine - growth &amp; development</subject><subject>Systems Analysis</subject><subject>TRUIE</subject><subject>Vertebrata</subject><issn>0021-8812</issn><issn>1525-3163</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1993</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNpdkc-rEzEQx4Moz2f16kEQgoieWjPJJrt7fDz88eCBB33nMM3Otin7o2Z2qf3vTWnpQRiYw3zyHeYTId6CWmmryy9Q12ZVAoCuKvv3mbgFq-3SgDPPxa1SGpZVBfqleMW8Uwq0re2NuKl0qSzArfAPw0SbhBM1ko88Uc8SB-yOHFmOreTxIBPtOwzU0zDJE8kyDhLlNlLCFLYxYCf5EAeS60TUxGEjeUpzmOZEr8WLFjumN5e-EE_fvv6-_7F8_Pn94f7ucRlMXU5LV9rKNQVqY1wJrXFNbtrVgZQjZwBqKtBqF2xYN2DbtQasdROgMajJGLMQn865-zT-mYkn30cO1HU40DizL10-3eRaiA__gbtxTvli9hoqMEaZE7Q6QyGNzIlav0-xx3T0oPxJuz9p91ft-cH7S-q87qm54hfPef7xMkfOutqEQ4h8xQpVWGVdxj6fsW3cbA8xkeceuy6Hgt8hl-AB_GljJt-dyRZHj5uUw55-1UWhIf_8P2GVnv0</recordid><startdate>19931101</startdate><enddate>19931101</enddate><creator>Faust, M.A</creator><creator>Robison, O.W</creator><creator>Tess, M.W</creator><general>Am Soc Animal Sci</general><general>American Society of Animal Science</general><general>Oxford University Press</general><scope>FBQ</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>U9A</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19931101</creationdate><title>Integrated systems analysis of sow replacement rates in a hierarchical swine breeding structure</title><author>Faust, M.A ; Robison, O.W ; Tess, M.W</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c397t-67586d4a233671f36d671269ce06e63119e4a526c5cbd15fb21a92dc1d3a2e333</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1993</creationdate><topic>ANALISIS DE COSTOS</topic><topic>ANALYSE DES COUTS</topic><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Breeding - economics</topic><topic>Breeding - methods</topic><topic>Breeding of animals</topic><topic>CERDAS</topic><topic>Classical genetics, quantitative genetics, hybrids</topic><topic>COMPORTAMIENTO ECONOMICO</topic><topic>COMPORTEMENT ECONOMIQUE</topic><topic>COSTOS DE PRODUCCION</topic><topic>Costs and Cost Analysis</topic><topic>COUT DE PRODUCTION</topic><topic>CROISEMENT</topic><topic>Crosses, Genetic</topic><topic>CRUZAMIENTO</topic><topic>Economics</topic><topic>ELIMINACION</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>Genetics of eukaryotes. Biological and molecular evolution</topic><topic>Hogs</topic><topic>Income</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>METHODE D'AMELIORATION</topic><topic>METODOS DE MEJORAMIENTO</topic><topic>MODELE DE SIMULATION</topic><topic>MODELOS DE SIMULACION</topic><topic>Models, Biological</topic><topic>Parity</topic><topic>REFORME</topic><topic>Selection, Genetic</topic><topic>Stochastic Processes</topic><topic>Swine - genetics</topic><topic>Swine - growth &amp; development</topic><topic>Systems Analysis</topic><topic>TRUIE</topic><topic>Vertebrata</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Faust, M.A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Robison, O.W</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tess, M.W</creatorcontrib><collection>AGRIS</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of animal science</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Faust, M.A</au><au>Robison, O.W</au><au>Tess, M.W</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Integrated systems analysis of sow replacement rates in a hierarchical swine breeding structure</atitle><jtitle>Journal of animal science</jtitle><addtitle>J Anim Sci</addtitle><date>1993-11-01</date><risdate>1993</risdate><volume>71</volume><issue>11</issue><spage>2885</spage><epage>2890</epage><pages>2885-2890</pages><issn>0021-8812</issn><eissn>1525-3163</eissn><abstract>Sow replacement rates in a three-tiered breeding structure were investigated for a 10-yr planning horizon using a stochastic life-cycle swine production model. Market hogs were produced in a three-breed static crossing program and marketed on a liveweight basis. Growth and reproductive traits of individual pigs were simulated using genetic, environmental, and economic parameters. Sows were culled after a maximum of 1, 5, or 10 parities. Systems were defined by maximum sow age at culling and included combinations of 1- and 5-parity nucleus and 1-, 5-, and 10-parity multiplier and commercial tiers. Economic response to index selection was considerable for all culling alternatives with yearly increases in system profits ranging from $1.06 to 1.44 for each commercial hog marketed. When sows were culled after one parity in nucleus, multiplier, and commercial tiers, respectively (1,1,1), annual changes in net returns and all cost measures were 40 to 50% larger than responses in systems with lower sow replacement rates. Based on 10-yr averages for net returns, systems with low multiplier- and commercial-level replacement rates were more profitable than systems with higher replacement rates. The most profitable system (5,10,10) differed from the least profitable system (1,1,1) by more than $10 per pig, but when the (1,1,1) system was excluded, the range was only $3 per pig. The system with lowest replacement rates supported 3,388 more multiplier and 34,151 more commercial sows from a 750-sow nucleus level than the (1,1,1) system. Output from the two extremes differed by 664,000 commercial market hogs sold. Greater benefit and larger tier sizes resulted from increasing maximum parity level from 1 to 5 than from increasing parity from 5 to 10</abstract><cop>Savoy, IL</cop><pub>Am Soc Animal Sci</pub><pmid>8270511</pmid><doi>10.2527/1993.71112885x</doi><tpages>6</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0021-8812
ispartof Journal of animal science, 1993-11, Vol.71 (11), p.2885-2890
issn 0021-8812
1525-3163
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_76125325
source MEDLINE; Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects ANALISIS DE COSTOS
ANALYSE DES COUTS
Animals
Biological and medical sciences
Breeding - economics
Breeding - methods
Breeding of animals
CERDAS
Classical genetics, quantitative genetics, hybrids
COMPORTAMIENTO ECONOMICO
COMPORTEMENT ECONOMIQUE
COSTOS DE PRODUCCION
Costs and Cost Analysis
COUT DE PRODUCTION
CROISEMENT
Crosses, Genetic
CRUZAMIENTO
Economics
ELIMINACION
Female
Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology
Genetics of eukaryotes. Biological and molecular evolution
Hogs
Income
Male
METHODE D'AMELIORATION
METODOS DE MEJORAMIENTO
MODELE DE SIMULATION
MODELOS DE SIMULACION
Models, Biological
Parity
REFORME
Selection, Genetic
Stochastic Processes
Swine - genetics
Swine - growth & development
Systems Analysis
TRUIE
Vertebrata
title Integrated systems analysis of sow replacement rates in a hierarchical swine breeding structure
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-04T21%3A51%3A57IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Integrated%20systems%20analysis%20of%20sow%20replacement%20rates%20in%20a%20hierarchical%20swine%20breeding%20structure&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20animal%20science&rft.au=Faust,%20M.A&rft.date=1993-11-01&rft.volume=71&rft.issue=11&rft.spage=2885&rft.epage=2890&rft.pages=2885-2890&rft.issn=0021-8812&rft.eissn=1525-3163&rft_id=info:doi/10.2527/1993.71112885x&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E76125325%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=218133035&rft_id=info:pmid/8270511&rfr_iscdi=true