Coin ingestion: Does every child need a radiograph?

We studied 80 children who presented to the emergency department (ED) with a complaint of coin ingestion to determine whether radiographs are necessary in all situations and to determine which symptoms or signs are predictive of esophageal coins. Radiographs were considered positive if the coin was...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Annals of emergency medicine 1985-05, Vol.14 (5), p.443-446
Hauptverfasser: Hodge, Dee, Tecklenburg, Frederick, Fleisher, Gary
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 446
container_issue 5
container_start_page 443
container_title Annals of emergency medicine
container_volume 14
creator Hodge, Dee
Tecklenburg, Frederick
Fleisher, Gary
description We studied 80 children who presented to the emergency department (ED) with a complaint of coin ingestion to determine whether radiographs are necessary in all situations and to determine which symptoms or signs are predictive of esophageal coins. Radiographs were considered positive if the coin was in the esophagus. Radiographs were positive in 25 (31%) of patients, of whom 11 (14%) had no symptoms or signs in the ED. Fifty-five (69%) of the 80 patients had subdiaphragmatic foreign bodies (44 [55%]), or no foreign bodies (11 [14%]) seen on films. Fourteen (18%) of the children required removal of the coin. Variables correlating with positive radiograph, in order of significance, included localization, choking at ingestion, drooling in the ED, vomiting, and chest pain. ( P < .05). Symptom type was predictive of radiographic findings, and it may be predictive of need for removal. All 14 patients with symptoms or signs in the ED had positive films, as compared to 11 of 66 (16.6%) with no symptoms (chi square = 33.555; P < .001). Although this relationship is significant, the finding of esophageal foreign body in 17% of patients with no symptoms leads us to recommend that all patients have a chest radiograph if coin ingestion is suspected.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/S0196-0644(85)80289-4
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_76077030</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0196064485802894</els_id><sourcerecordid>76077030</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c389t-814afcb022bd5f043f16fb2970170ce6a43aa8556f899026e089fcc71e93e8e33</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkMtOwzAQRS0EKqXwCZWyQAgWgXHsODabCpWnVIkFsLYcZ1yM0qTYbaX-PelD3bKaxZw7j0PIkMItBSruPoAqkYLg_FrmNxIyqVJ-RPoUVJGKQsAx6R-QU3IW4w8AKJ7RHukxJXMu8j5h49Y3iW-mGBe-be6TxxZjgisM68R--7pKGsQqMUkwlW-nwcy_R-fkxJk64sW-DsjX89Pn-DWdvL-8jR8mqWVSLVJJuXG2hCwrq9wBZ44KV2aqAFqARWE4M0bmuXBSKcgEglTO2oKiYiiRsQG52s2dh_Z32R2oZz5arGvTYLuMuvuxKIBBB-Y70IY2xoBOz4OfmbDWFPRGlt7K0hsTWuZ6K0vzLjfcL1iWM6wOqb2drn-575toTe2CaayPB0xRxhhXHTbaYdjJWHkMOlqPjcXKB7QLXbX-n0P-ACdKhA0</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>76077030</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Coin ingestion: Does every child need a radiograph?</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Hodge, Dee ; Tecklenburg, Frederick ; Fleisher, Gary</creator><creatorcontrib>Hodge, Dee ; Tecklenburg, Frederick ; Fleisher, Gary</creatorcontrib><description>We studied 80 children who presented to the emergency department (ED) with a complaint of coin ingestion to determine whether radiographs are necessary in all situations and to determine which symptoms or signs are predictive of esophageal coins. Radiographs were considered positive if the coin was in the esophagus. Radiographs were positive in 25 (31%) of patients, of whom 11 (14%) had no symptoms or signs in the ED. Fifty-five (69%) of the 80 patients had subdiaphragmatic foreign bodies (44 [55%]), or no foreign bodies (11 [14%]) seen on films. Fourteen (18%) of the children required removal of the coin. Variables correlating with positive radiograph, in order of significance, included localization, choking at ingestion, drooling in the ED, vomiting, and chest pain. ( P &lt; .05). Symptom type was predictive of radiographic findings, and it may be predictive of need for removal. All 14 patients with symptoms or signs in the ED had positive films, as compared to 11 of 66 (16.6%) with no symptoms (chi square = 33.555; P &lt; .001). Although this relationship is significant, the finding of esophageal foreign body in 17% of patients with no symptoms leads us to recommend that all patients have a chest radiograph if coin ingestion is suspected.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0196-0644</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1097-6760</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/S0196-0644(85)80289-4</identifier><identifier>PMID: 3985465</identifier><identifier>CODEN: AEMED3</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York, NY: Mosby, Inc</publisher><subject>Biological and medical sciences ; Child ; Child, Preschool ; children ; coin ; Emergencies ; Esophagus - diagnostic imaging ; Female ; Foreign Bodies - diagnostic imaging ; Humans ; Infant ; ingestions ; Injuries of the abdomen. Foreign bodies of the digestive system ; Male ; Medical Records ; Medical sciences ; radiographs in ; Radiography ; Regression Analysis ; Traumas. Diseases due to physical agents</subject><ispartof>Annals of emergency medicine, 1985-05, Vol.14 (5), p.443-446</ispartof><rights>1985 American College of Emergency Physicians</rights><rights>1985 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c389t-814afcb022bd5f043f16fb2970170ce6a43aa8556f899026e089fcc71e93e8e33</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c389t-814afcb022bd5f043f16fb2970170ce6a43aa8556f899026e089fcc71e93e8e33</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0196064485802894$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3536,27903,27904,65309</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=9133349$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/3985465$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Hodge, Dee</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tecklenburg, Frederick</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fleisher, Gary</creatorcontrib><title>Coin ingestion: Does every child need a radiograph?</title><title>Annals of emergency medicine</title><addtitle>Ann Emerg Med</addtitle><description>We studied 80 children who presented to the emergency department (ED) with a complaint of coin ingestion to determine whether radiographs are necessary in all situations and to determine which symptoms or signs are predictive of esophageal coins. Radiographs were considered positive if the coin was in the esophagus. Radiographs were positive in 25 (31%) of patients, of whom 11 (14%) had no symptoms or signs in the ED. Fifty-five (69%) of the 80 patients had subdiaphragmatic foreign bodies (44 [55%]), or no foreign bodies (11 [14%]) seen on films. Fourteen (18%) of the children required removal of the coin. Variables correlating with positive radiograph, in order of significance, included localization, choking at ingestion, drooling in the ED, vomiting, and chest pain. ( P &lt; .05). Symptom type was predictive of radiographic findings, and it may be predictive of need for removal. All 14 patients with symptoms or signs in the ED had positive films, as compared to 11 of 66 (16.6%) with no symptoms (chi square = 33.555; P &lt; .001). Although this relationship is significant, the finding of esophageal foreign body in 17% of patients with no symptoms leads us to recommend that all patients have a chest radiograph if coin ingestion is suspected.</description><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Child</subject><subject>Child, Preschool</subject><subject>children</subject><subject>coin</subject><subject>Emergencies</subject><subject>Esophagus - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Foreign Bodies - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Infant</subject><subject>ingestions</subject><subject>Injuries of the abdomen. Foreign bodies of the digestive system</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medical Records</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>radiographs in</subject><subject>Radiography</subject><subject>Regression Analysis</subject><subject>Traumas. Diseases due to physical agents</subject><issn>0196-0644</issn><issn>1097-6760</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1985</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkMtOwzAQRS0EKqXwCZWyQAgWgXHsODabCpWnVIkFsLYcZ1yM0qTYbaX-PelD3bKaxZw7j0PIkMItBSruPoAqkYLg_FrmNxIyqVJ-RPoUVJGKQsAx6R-QU3IW4w8AKJ7RHukxJXMu8j5h49Y3iW-mGBe-be6TxxZjgisM68R--7pKGsQqMUkwlW-nwcy_R-fkxJk64sW-DsjX89Pn-DWdvL-8jR8mqWVSLVJJuXG2hCwrq9wBZ44KV2aqAFqARWE4M0bmuXBSKcgEglTO2oKiYiiRsQG52s2dh_Z32R2oZz5arGvTYLuMuvuxKIBBB-Y70IY2xoBOz4OfmbDWFPRGlt7K0hsTWuZ6K0vzLjfcL1iWM6wOqb2drn-575toTe2CaayPB0xRxhhXHTbaYdjJWHkMOlqPjcXKB7QLXbX-n0P-ACdKhA0</recordid><startdate>198505</startdate><enddate>198505</enddate><creator>Hodge, Dee</creator><creator>Tecklenburg, Frederick</creator><creator>Fleisher, Gary</creator><general>Mosby, Inc</general><general>Elsevier</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>198505</creationdate><title>Coin ingestion: Does every child need a radiograph?</title><author>Hodge, Dee ; Tecklenburg, Frederick ; Fleisher, Gary</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c389t-814afcb022bd5f043f16fb2970170ce6a43aa8556f899026e089fcc71e93e8e33</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1985</creationdate><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Child</topic><topic>Child, Preschool</topic><topic>children</topic><topic>coin</topic><topic>Emergencies</topic><topic>Esophagus - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Foreign Bodies - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Infant</topic><topic>ingestions</topic><topic>Injuries of the abdomen. Foreign bodies of the digestive system</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medical Records</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>radiographs in</topic><topic>Radiography</topic><topic>Regression Analysis</topic><topic>Traumas. Diseases due to physical agents</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Hodge, Dee</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tecklenburg, Frederick</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fleisher, Gary</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Annals of emergency medicine</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Hodge, Dee</au><au>Tecklenburg, Frederick</au><au>Fleisher, Gary</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Coin ingestion: Does every child need a radiograph?</atitle><jtitle>Annals of emergency medicine</jtitle><addtitle>Ann Emerg Med</addtitle><date>1985-05</date><risdate>1985</risdate><volume>14</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>443</spage><epage>446</epage><pages>443-446</pages><issn>0196-0644</issn><eissn>1097-6760</eissn><coden>AEMED3</coden><abstract>We studied 80 children who presented to the emergency department (ED) with a complaint of coin ingestion to determine whether radiographs are necessary in all situations and to determine which symptoms or signs are predictive of esophageal coins. Radiographs were considered positive if the coin was in the esophagus. Radiographs were positive in 25 (31%) of patients, of whom 11 (14%) had no symptoms or signs in the ED. Fifty-five (69%) of the 80 patients had subdiaphragmatic foreign bodies (44 [55%]), or no foreign bodies (11 [14%]) seen on films. Fourteen (18%) of the children required removal of the coin. Variables correlating with positive radiograph, in order of significance, included localization, choking at ingestion, drooling in the ED, vomiting, and chest pain. ( P &lt; .05). Symptom type was predictive of radiographic findings, and it may be predictive of need for removal. All 14 patients with symptoms or signs in the ED had positive films, as compared to 11 of 66 (16.6%) with no symptoms (chi square = 33.555; P &lt; .001). Although this relationship is significant, the finding of esophageal foreign body in 17% of patients with no symptoms leads us to recommend that all patients have a chest radiograph if coin ingestion is suspected.</abstract><cop>New York, NY</cop><pub>Mosby, Inc</pub><pmid>3985465</pmid><doi>10.1016/S0196-0644(85)80289-4</doi><tpages>4</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0196-0644
ispartof Annals of emergency medicine, 1985-05, Vol.14 (5), p.443-446
issn 0196-0644
1097-6760
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_76077030
source MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals
subjects Biological and medical sciences
Child
Child, Preschool
children
coin
Emergencies
Esophagus - diagnostic imaging
Female
Foreign Bodies - diagnostic imaging
Humans
Infant
ingestions
Injuries of the abdomen. Foreign bodies of the digestive system
Male
Medical Records
Medical sciences
radiographs in
Radiography
Regression Analysis
Traumas. Diseases due to physical agents
title Coin ingestion: Does every child need a radiograph?
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-26T08%3A50%3A51IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Coin%20ingestion:%20Does%20every%20child%20need%20a%20radiograph?&rft.jtitle=Annals%20of%20emergency%20medicine&rft.au=Hodge,%20Dee&rft.date=1985-05&rft.volume=14&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=443&rft.epage=446&rft.pages=443-446&rft.issn=0196-0644&rft.eissn=1097-6760&rft.coden=AEMED3&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/S0196-0644(85)80289-4&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E76077030%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=76077030&rft_id=info:pmid/3985465&rft_els_id=S0196064485802894&rfr_iscdi=true