Suprapubic Versus Transurethral Bladder Drainage after Colposuspension/Vaginal Repair
Ninety-two patients with preoperative sterile urine undergoing colposuspension or vaginal repair operation for stress urinary incontinence and/or genital descensus were randomized to either suprapubic or transurethral postoperative catheter drainage. The prevalence of significant bac-teriuria on the...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Acta obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica 1985, Vol.64 (2), p.139-143 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 143 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 2 |
| container_start_page | 139 |
| container_title | Acta obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica |
| container_volume | 64 |
| creator | Andersen, J. T. Heisterberg, L. Hebjørn, S. Petersen, K. Sørensen, S. Stampe Fischer-Rasmussen, W. Pedersen, L. Moisted Nielsen, N. C. |
| description | Ninety-two patients with preoperative sterile urine undergoing colposuspension or vaginal repair operation for stress urinary incontinence and/or genital descensus were randomized to either suprapubic or transurethral postoperative catheter drainage. The prevalence of significant bac-teriuria on the fifth postoperative day was statistically significantly lower when using suprapubic catheter (20.8%) than with transurethral catheter drainage (45.5%). This applied especially to colposuspension. The rate of postoperatively impaired bladder emptying also tended to be reduced when using suprapubic catheter. At follow-up after one year, postoperative bacteriuria was closely correlated to increased rates of both clinical cystitis and asymptomatic significant bacteriuria. Thus it is recommended to use suprapubic bladder drainage not only after colposuspension but also after vaginal repair in an effort to avoid an increased risk of urinary infections. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.3109/00016348509154707 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_76067406</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>76067406</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3770-18f78a023882f6e6f8e3fa63f2500e5d84b32ea294319c9100807485b908bd063</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkUFv1DAQhS0EKkvhB3BAygFxCx3biWOLU1nogqioRLft0Zpkx90UbxLsRNB_j8tGe0GCkzV63xvPvGHsJYe3koM5AQCuZKFLMLwsKqgesQVXADkUXDxmiwc9T4B5yp7FeJcqURX6iB1JrUul9IJdXU5DwGGq2ya7phCnmK0DdnEKNG4D-uy9x82GQvYhYNvhLWXoxlQuez_0iR6oi23fnVzjbZJ99o0GbMNz9sShj_Rifo_Z1dnH9fJTfn6x-rw8Pc8bWVWQc-0qjSDSNMIpUk6TdKikEyUAlRtd1FIQClNIbhrDATSk-cvagK43oOQxe7PvO4T-x0RxtLs2NuQ9dtRP0VYKVFX8AfkebEIfYyBnh9DuMNxbDvYhSvtXlMnzam4-1TvaHBxzdkl_PesYG_Quxda08YAZoaU0JmFqj_1sPd3__197erFS6YjJmO-NbRzp18GI4btVlaxKe_N1ZdfFl8u1EGf2JvHvZr5zfdjhltCP2wYD2bt-Cuk68R_b_gYmo6tE</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>76067406</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Suprapubic Versus Transurethral Bladder Drainage after Colposuspension/Vaginal Repair</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Journals</source><creator>Andersen, J. T. ; Heisterberg, L. ; Hebjørn, S. ; Petersen, K. ; Sørensen, S. Stampe ; Fischer-Rasmussen, W. ; Pedersen, L. Moisted ; Nielsen, N. C.</creator><creatorcontrib>Andersen, J. T. ; Heisterberg, L. ; Hebjørn, S. ; Petersen, K. ; Sørensen, S. Stampe ; Fischer-Rasmussen, W. ; Pedersen, L. Moisted ; Nielsen, N. C.</creatorcontrib><description>Ninety-two patients with preoperative sterile urine undergoing colposuspension or vaginal repair operation for stress urinary incontinence and/or genital descensus were randomized to either suprapubic or transurethral postoperative catheter drainage. The prevalence of significant bac-teriuria on the fifth postoperative day was statistically significantly lower when using suprapubic catheter (20.8%) than with transurethral catheter drainage (45.5%). This applied especially to colposuspension. The rate of postoperatively impaired bladder emptying also tended to be reduced when using suprapubic catheter. At follow-up after one year, postoperative bacteriuria was closely correlated to increased rates of both clinical cystitis and asymptomatic significant bacteriuria. Thus it is recommended to use suprapubic bladder drainage not only after colposuspension but also after vaginal repair in an effort to avoid an increased risk of urinary infections.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0001-6349</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1600-0412</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3109/00016348509154707</identifier><identifier>PMID: 3885668</identifier><identifier>CODEN: AOGSAE</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford, UK: Informa UK Ltd</publisher><subject>Adult ; Aged ; bacteriuria ; Bacteriuria - prevention & control ; Biological and medical sciences ; Clinical Trials as Topic ; colposuspension ; Cystitis - prevention & control ; Drainage - methods ; Female ; Female genital diseases ; Follow-Up Studies ; Gynecology. Andrology. Obstetrics ; Humans ; Medical sciences ; Middle Aged ; Non tumoral diseases ; Postoperative Complications - prevention & control ; Suprabupic catheter ; Urinary Catheterization - methods ; Urinary Incontinence, Stress - surgery ; Urinary Tract Infections - prevention & control ; Urination Disorders - prevention & control ; Vagina - surgery ; vaginal repair</subject><ispartof>Acta obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica, 1985, Vol.64 (2), p.139-143</ispartof><rights>1985 Informa UK Ltd All rights reserved: reproduction in whole or part not permitted 1985</rights><rights>1985 Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand</rights><rights>1985 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3770-18f78a023882f6e6f8e3fa63f2500e5d84b32ea294319c9100807485b908bd063</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3770-18f78a023882f6e6f8e3fa63f2500e5d84b32ea294319c9100807485b908bd063</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.3109%2F00016348509154707$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.3109%2F00016348509154707$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1417,4024,27923,27924,27925,45574,45575</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=9283399$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/3885668$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Andersen, J. T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Heisterberg, L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hebjørn, S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Petersen, K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sørensen, S. Stampe</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fischer-Rasmussen, W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pedersen, L. Moisted</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nielsen, N. C.</creatorcontrib><title>Suprapubic Versus Transurethral Bladder Drainage after Colposuspension/Vaginal Repair</title><title>Acta obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica</title><addtitle>Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand</addtitle><description>Ninety-two patients with preoperative sterile urine undergoing colposuspension or vaginal repair operation for stress urinary incontinence and/or genital descensus were randomized to either suprapubic or transurethral postoperative catheter drainage. The prevalence of significant bac-teriuria on the fifth postoperative day was statistically significantly lower when using suprapubic catheter (20.8%) than with transurethral catheter drainage (45.5%). This applied especially to colposuspension. The rate of postoperatively impaired bladder emptying also tended to be reduced when using suprapubic catheter. At follow-up after one year, postoperative bacteriuria was closely correlated to increased rates of both clinical cystitis and asymptomatic significant bacteriuria. Thus it is recommended to use suprapubic bladder drainage not only after colposuspension but also after vaginal repair in an effort to avoid an increased risk of urinary infections.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>bacteriuria</subject><subject>Bacteriuria - prevention & control</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Clinical Trials as Topic</subject><subject>colposuspension</subject><subject>Cystitis - prevention & control</subject><subject>Drainage - methods</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Female genital diseases</subject><subject>Follow-Up Studies</subject><subject>Gynecology. Andrology. Obstetrics</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Non tumoral diseases</subject><subject>Postoperative Complications - prevention & control</subject><subject>Suprabupic catheter</subject><subject>Urinary Catheterization - methods</subject><subject>Urinary Incontinence, Stress - surgery</subject><subject>Urinary Tract Infections - prevention & control</subject><subject>Urination Disorders - prevention & control</subject><subject>Vagina - surgery</subject><subject>vaginal repair</subject><issn>0001-6349</issn><issn>1600-0412</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1985</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkUFv1DAQhS0EKkvhB3BAygFxCx3biWOLU1nogqioRLft0Zpkx90UbxLsRNB_j8tGe0GCkzV63xvPvGHsJYe3koM5AQCuZKFLMLwsKqgesQVXADkUXDxmiwc9T4B5yp7FeJcqURX6iB1JrUul9IJdXU5DwGGq2ya7phCnmK0DdnEKNG4D-uy9x82GQvYhYNvhLWXoxlQuez_0iR6oi23fnVzjbZJ99o0GbMNz9sShj_Rifo_Z1dnH9fJTfn6x-rw8Pc8bWVWQc-0qjSDSNMIpUk6TdKikEyUAlRtd1FIQClNIbhrDATSk-cvagK43oOQxe7PvO4T-x0RxtLs2NuQ9dtRP0VYKVFX8AfkebEIfYyBnh9DuMNxbDvYhSvtXlMnzam4-1TvaHBxzdkl_PesYG_Quxda08YAZoaU0JmFqj_1sPd3__197erFS6YjJmO-NbRzp18GI4btVlaxKe_N1ZdfFl8u1EGf2JvHvZr5zfdjhltCP2wYD2bt-Cuk68R_b_gYmo6tE</recordid><startdate>1985</startdate><enddate>1985</enddate><creator>Andersen, J. T.</creator><creator>Heisterberg, L.</creator><creator>Hebjørn, S.</creator><creator>Petersen, K.</creator><creator>Sørensen, S. Stampe</creator><creator>Fischer-Rasmussen, W.</creator><creator>Pedersen, L. Moisted</creator><creator>Nielsen, N. C.</creator><general>Informa UK Ltd</general><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><general>Taylor & Francis</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>1985</creationdate><title>Suprapubic Versus Transurethral Bladder Drainage after Colposuspension/Vaginal Repair</title><author>Andersen, J. T. ; Heisterberg, L. ; Hebjørn, S. ; Petersen, K. ; Sørensen, S. Stampe ; Fischer-Rasmussen, W. ; Pedersen, L. Moisted ; Nielsen, N. C.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3770-18f78a023882f6e6f8e3fa63f2500e5d84b32ea294319c9100807485b908bd063</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1985</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>bacteriuria</topic><topic>Bacteriuria - prevention & control</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Clinical Trials as Topic</topic><topic>colposuspension</topic><topic>Cystitis - prevention & control</topic><topic>Drainage - methods</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Female genital diseases</topic><topic>Follow-Up Studies</topic><topic>Gynecology. Andrology. Obstetrics</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Non tumoral diseases</topic><topic>Postoperative Complications - prevention & control</topic><topic>Suprabupic catheter</topic><topic>Urinary Catheterization - methods</topic><topic>Urinary Incontinence, Stress - surgery</topic><topic>Urinary Tract Infections - prevention & control</topic><topic>Urination Disorders - prevention & control</topic><topic>Vagina - surgery</topic><topic>vaginal repair</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Andersen, J. T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Heisterberg, L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hebjørn, S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Petersen, K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sørensen, S. Stampe</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fischer-Rasmussen, W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pedersen, L. Moisted</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nielsen, N. C.</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Acta obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Andersen, J. T.</au><au>Heisterberg, L.</au><au>Hebjørn, S.</au><au>Petersen, K.</au><au>Sørensen, S. Stampe</au><au>Fischer-Rasmussen, W.</au><au>Pedersen, L. Moisted</au><au>Nielsen, N. C.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Suprapubic Versus Transurethral Bladder Drainage after Colposuspension/Vaginal Repair</atitle><jtitle>Acta obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica</jtitle><addtitle>Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand</addtitle><date>1985</date><risdate>1985</risdate><volume>64</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>139</spage><epage>143</epage><pages>139-143</pages><issn>0001-6349</issn><eissn>1600-0412</eissn><coden>AOGSAE</coden><abstract>Ninety-two patients with preoperative sterile urine undergoing colposuspension or vaginal repair operation for stress urinary incontinence and/or genital descensus were randomized to either suprapubic or transurethral postoperative catheter drainage. The prevalence of significant bac-teriuria on the fifth postoperative day was statistically significantly lower when using suprapubic catheter (20.8%) than with transurethral catheter drainage (45.5%). This applied especially to colposuspension. The rate of postoperatively impaired bladder emptying also tended to be reduced when using suprapubic catheter. At follow-up after one year, postoperative bacteriuria was closely correlated to increased rates of both clinical cystitis and asymptomatic significant bacteriuria. Thus it is recommended to use suprapubic bladder drainage not only after colposuspension but also after vaginal repair in an effort to avoid an increased risk of urinary infections.</abstract><cop>Oxford, UK</cop><pub>Informa UK Ltd</pub><pmid>3885668</pmid><doi>10.3109/00016348509154707</doi><tpages>5</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0001-6349 |
| ispartof | Acta obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica, 1985, Vol.64 (2), p.139-143 |
| issn | 0001-6349 1600-0412 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_76067406 |
| source | MEDLINE; Wiley Journals |
| subjects | Adult Aged bacteriuria Bacteriuria - prevention & control Biological and medical sciences Clinical Trials as Topic colposuspension Cystitis - prevention & control Drainage - methods Female Female genital diseases Follow-Up Studies Gynecology. Andrology. Obstetrics Humans Medical sciences Middle Aged Non tumoral diseases Postoperative Complications - prevention & control Suprabupic catheter Urinary Catheterization - methods Urinary Incontinence, Stress - surgery Urinary Tract Infections - prevention & control Urination Disorders - prevention & control Vagina - surgery vaginal repair |
| title | Suprapubic Versus Transurethral Bladder Drainage after Colposuspension/Vaginal Repair |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-24T05%3A38%3A26IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Suprapubic%20Versus%20Transurethral%20Bladder%20Drainage%20after%20Colposuspension/Vaginal%20Repair&rft.jtitle=Acta%20obstetricia%20et%20gynecologica%20Scandinavica&rft.au=Andersen,%20J.%20T.&rft.date=1985&rft.volume=64&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=139&rft.epage=143&rft.pages=139-143&rft.issn=0001-6349&rft.eissn=1600-0412&rft.coden=AOGSAE&rft_id=info:doi/10.3109/00016348509154707&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E76067406%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=76067406&rft_id=info:pmid/3885668&rfr_iscdi=true |