Influence of posterior condylar offset on knee flexion after cruciate-sacrificing mobile-bearing total knee replacement: A prospective analysis of 410 consecutive cases

Abstract The range of motion of the knee joint after Total Knee Replacement (TKR) is a factor of great importance that determines the postoperative function of patients. Much enthusiasm has been recently directed towards the posterior condylar offset with some authors reporting increasing postoperat...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The knee 2010-12, Vol.17 (6), p.375-380
Hauptverfasser: Bauer, T, Biau, D, Colmar, M, Poux, X, Hardy, P, Lortat-Jacob, A
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 380
container_issue 6
container_start_page 375
container_title The knee
container_volume 17
creator Bauer, T
Biau, D
Colmar, M
Poux, X
Hardy, P
Lortat-Jacob, A
description Abstract The range of motion of the knee joint after Total Knee Replacement (TKR) is a factor of great importance that determines the postoperative function of patients. Much enthusiasm has been recently directed towards the posterior condylar offset with some authors reporting increasing postoperative knee flexion with increasing posterior condylar offset and others who did not report any significant association. Patients undergoing primary total knee replacement were included in a prospective multicentre study and the effect of the posterior condylar offset on the postoperative knee flexion was assessed after adjusting for known influential factors. All knees were implanted by three senior orthopedist surgeons with the same cemented cruciate-sacrificing mobile-bearing implant and with identical surgical technique. Clinical data, active knee flexion and posterior condylar offset were recorded preoperatively and postoperatively at a minimal one year follow-up for all patients. Univariate and multivariate linear models were fitted to select independent predictors of the postoperative knee flexion. Four hundred and ten consecutive total knee replacements (379 patients) were included in the study. The mean preoperative knee flexion was 112°. The mean condylar offset was 28.3 mm preoperatively and 29.4 mm postoperatively. The mean postoperative knee flexion was 108°. No correlation was found between the posterior condylar offset or the tibial slope and the postoperative knee flexion. The most significant predictive factor for postoperative flexion after posterior-stabilized TKR without PCL retention was the preoperative range of flexion, with a linear effect.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.knee.2009.11.001
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_760234456</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>1_s2_0_S0968016009002117</els_id><sourcerecordid>760234456</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c504t-4641485f843e50cc3848641e29a3a5550ccf3eae8f2d3b59f76716e26c36eda83</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9ks1u1DAQxyMEotvCC3BAljhwyjKOP5IghFRVFCpV4gCcLa8zRt46cbCTin0jHhObXalSD5ysGf_m8z9V9YrClgKV7_bbuwlx2wD0W0q3APRJtaFdy2rRATytNtDLrs4knFXnKe0BQPZcPK_OaN8L3nfNpvpzM1m_4mSQBEvmkBaMLkRiwjQcvI7ZaxMuJEykFCPW42-XDW0zSExcjdML1kmb6KwzbvpJxrBzHusd6ljMJSzaH4Mjzl4bHHFa3pNLMseQZjSLu0eiJ-0PyaXSBadQ6ic0678_oxOmF9Uzq33Cl6f3ovpx_en71Zf69uvnm6vL29oI4EvNJae8E7bjDAUYwzreZRc2vWZaiOKyDDV2thnYTvS2lS2V2EjDJA66YxfV22Pe3N2vFdOiRpcMeq8nDGtSrYSGcS5kJt88IvdhjXmOpCiwvF4peJOp5kiZPG2KaNUc3ajjIUOqyKj2qixHFRkVpSrLmINen1KvuxGHh5CTbhn4cAQwr-LeYVTJuKLi4GLeqBqC-3_-j4_CjXeTM9rf4QHTwxwqNQrUt3JI5Y6gB2gobdlfdxbFmw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1034986542</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Influence of posterior condylar offset on knee flexion after cruciate-sacrificing mobile-bearing total knee replacement: A prospective analysis of 410 consecutive cases</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Bauer, T ; Biau, D ; Colmar, M ; Poux, X ; Hardy, P ; Lortat-Jacob, A</creator><creatorcontrib>Bauer, T ; Biau, D ; Colmar, M ; Poux, X ; Hardy, P ; Lortat-Jacob, A</creatorcontrib><description>Abstract The range of motion of the knee joint after Total Knee Replacement (TKR) is a factor of great importance that determines the postoperative function of patients. Much enthusiasm has been recently directed towards the posterior condylar offset with some authors reporting increasing postoperative knee flexion with increasing posterior condylar offset and others who did not report any significant association. Patients undergoing primary total knee replacement were included in a prospective multicentre study and the effect of the posterior condylar offset on the postoperative knee flexion was assessed after adjusting for known influential factors. All knees were implanted by three senior orthopedist surgeons with the same cemented cruciate-sacrificing mobile-bearing implant and with identical surgical technique. Clinical data, active knee flexion and posterior condylar offset were recorded preoperatively and postoperatively at a minimal one year follow-up for all patients. Univariate and multivariate linear models were fitted to select independent predictors of the postoperative knee flexion. Four hundred and ten consecutive total knee replacements (379 patients) were included in the study. The mean preoperative knee flexion was 112°. The mean condylar offset was 28.3 mm preoperatively and 29.4 mm postoperatively. The mean postoperative knee flexion was 108°. No correlation was found between the posterior condylar offset or the tibial slope and the postoperative knee flexion. The most significant predictive factor for postoperative flexion after posterior-stabilized TKR without PCL retention was the preoperative range of flexion, with a linear effect.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0968-0160</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-5800</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.knee.2009.11.001</identifier><identifier>PMID: 19954982</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Netherlands: Elsevier B.V</publisher><subject>Aged ; Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee - instrumentation ; Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee - methods ; Biomechanical Phenomena ; Biomechanics ; Female ; Humans ; Knee flexion ; Knee Joint - physiopathology ; Knee Joint - surgery ; Knee Prosthesis ; Male ; Orthopedics ; Posterior condylar offset ; Posterior Cruciate Ligament - surgery ; Postoperative Complications ; Prospective Studies ; Range of Motion, Articular - physiology ; Recovery of Function ; Total knee arthroplasty</subject><ispartof>The knee, 2010-12, Vol.17 (6), p.375-380</ispartof><rights>Elsevier B.V.</rights><rights>2009 Elsevier B.V.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2009 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c504t-4641485f843e50cc3848641e29a3a5550ccf3eae8f2d3b59f76716e26c36eda83</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c504t-4641485f843e50cc3848641e29a3a5550ccf3eae8f2d3b59f76716e26c36eda83</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0968016009002117$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,27901,27902,65534</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19954982$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Bauer, T</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Biau, D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Colmar, M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Poux, X</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hardy, P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lortat-Jacob, A</creatorcontrib><title>Influence of posterior condylar offset on knee flexion after cruciate-sacrificing mobile-bearing total knee replacement: A prospective analysis of 410 consecutive cases</title><title>The knee</title><addtitle>Knee</addtitle><description>Abstract The range of motion of the knee joint after Total Knee Replacement (TKR) is a factor of great importance that determines the postoperative function of patients. Much enthusiasm has been recently directed towards the posterior condylar offset with some authors reporting increasing postoperative knee flexion with increasing posterior condylar offset and others who did not report any significant association. Patients undergoing primary total knee replacement were included in a prospective multicentre study and the effect of the posterior condylar offset on the postoperative knee flexion was assessed after adjusting for known influential factors. All knees were implanted by three senior orthopedist surgeons with the same cemented cruciate-sacrificing mobile-bearing implant and with identical surgical technique. Clinical data, active knee flexion and posterior condylar offset were recorded preoperatively and postoperatively at a minimal one year follow-up for all patients. Univariate and multivariate linear models were fitted to select independent predictors of the postoperative knee flexion. Four hundred and ten consecutive total knee replacements (379 patients) were included in the study. The mean preoperative knee flexion was 112°. The mean condylar offset was 28.3 mm preoperatively and 29.4 mm postoperatively. The mean postoperative knee flexion was 108°. No correlation was found between the posterior condylar offset or the tibial slope and the postoperative knee flexion. The most significant predictive factor for postoperative flexion after posterior-stabilized TKR without PCL retention was the preoperative range of flexion, with a linear effect.</description><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee - instrumentation</subject><subject>Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee - methods</subject><subject>Biomechanical Phenomena</subject><subject>Biomechanics</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Knee flexion</subject><subject>Knee Joint - physiopathology</subject><subject>Knee Joint - surgery</subject><subject>Knee Prosthesis</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Orthopedics</subject><subject>Posterior condylar offset</subject><subject>Posterior Cruciate Ligament - surgery</subject><subject>Postoperative Complications</subject><subject>Prospective Studies</subject><subject>Range of Motion, Articular - physiology</subject><subject>Recovery of Function</subject><subject>Total knee arthroplasty</subject><issn>0968-0160</issn><issn>1873-5800</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2010</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9ks1u1DAQxyMEotvCC3BAljhwyjKOP5IghFRVFCpV4gCcLa8zRt46cbCTin0jHhObXalSD5ysGf_m8z9V9YrClgKV7_bbuwlx2wD0W0q3APRJtaFdy2rRATytNtDLrs4knFXnKe0BQPZcPK_OaN8L3nfNpvpzM1m_4mSQBEvmkBaMLkRiwjQcvI7ZaxMuJEykFCPW42-XDW0zSExcjdML1kmb6KwzbvpJxrBzHusd6ljMJSzaH4Mjzl4bHHFa3pNLMseQZjSLu0eiJ-0PyaXSBadQ6ic0678_oxOmF9Uzq33Cl6f3ovpx_en71Zf69uvnm6vL29oI4EvNJae8E7bjDAUYwzreZRc2vWZaiOKyDDV2thnYTvS2lS2V2EjDJA66YxfV22Pe3N2vFdOiRpcMeq8nDGtSrYSGcS5kJt88IvdhjXmOpCiwvF4peJOp5kiZPG2KaNUc3ajjIUOqyKj2qixHFRkVpSrLmINen1KvuxGHh5CTbhn4cAQwr-LeYVTJuKLi4GLeqBqC-3_-j4_CjXeTM9rf4QHTwxwqNQrUt3JI5Y6gB2gobdlfdxbFmw</recordid><startdate>20101201</startdate><enddate>20101201</enddate><creator>Bauer, T</creator><creator>Biau, D</creator><creator>Colmar, M</creator><creator>Poux, X</creator><creator>Hardy, P</creator><creator>Lortat-Jacob, A</creator><general>Elsevier B.V</general><general>Elsevier Limited</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QP</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20101201</creationdate><title>Influence of posterior condylar offset on knee flexion after cruciate-sacrificing mobile-bearing total knee replacement: A prospective analysis of 410 consecutive cases</title><author>Bauer, T ; Biau, D ; Colmar, M ; Poux, X ; Hardy, P ; Lortat-Jacob, A</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c504t-4641485f843e50cc3848641e29a3a5550ccf3eae8f2d3b59f76716e26c36eda83</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2010</creationdate><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee - instrumentation</topic><topic>Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee - methods</topic><topic>Biomechanical Phenomena</topic><topic>Biomechanics</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Knee flexion</topic><topic>Knee Joint - physiopathology</topic><topic>Knee Joint - surgery</topic><topic>Knee Prosthesis</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Orthopedics</topic><topic>Posterior condylar offset</topic><topic>Posterior Cruciate Ligament - surgery</topic><topic>Postoperative Complications</topic><topic>Prospective Studies</topic><topic>Range of Motion, Articular - physiology</topic><topic>Recovery of Function</topic><topic>Total knee arthroplasty</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Bauer, T</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Biau, D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Colmar, M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Poux, X</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hardy, P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lortat-Jacob, A</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Calcium &amp; Calcified Tissue Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>The knee</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Bauer, T</au><au>Biau, D</au><au>Colmar, M</au><au>Poux, X</au><au>Hardy, P</au><au>Lortat-Jacob, A</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Influence of posterior condylar offset on knee flexion after cruciate-sacrificing mobile-bearing total knee replacement: A prospective analysis of 410 consecutive cases</atitle><jtitle>The knee</jtitle><addtitle>Knee</addtitle><date>2010-12-01</date><risdate>2010</risdate><volume>17</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>375</spage><epage>380</epage><pages>375-380</pages><issn>0968-0160</issn><eissn>1873-5800</eissn><abstract>Abstract The range of motion of the knee joint after Total Knee Replacement (TKR) is a factor of great importance that determines the postoperative function of patients. Much enthusiasm has been recently directed towards the posterior condylar offset with some authors reporting increasing postoperative knee flexion with increasing posterior condylar offset and others who did not report any significant association. Patients undergoing primary total knee replacement were included in a prospective multicentre study and the effect of the posterior condylar offset on the postoperative knee flexion was assessed after adjusting for known influential factors. All knees were implanted by three senior orthopedist surgeons with the same cemented cruciate-sacrificing mobile-bearing implant and with identical surgical technique. Clinical data, active knee flexion and posterior condylar offset were recorded preoperatively and postoperatively at a minimal one year follow-up for all patients. Univariate and multivariate linear models were fitted to select independent predictors of the postoperative knee flexion. Four hundred and ten consecutive total knee replacements (379 patients) were included in the study. The mean preoperative knee flexion was 112°. The mean condylar offset was 28.3 mm preoperatively and 29.4 mm postoperatively. The mean postoperative knee flexion was 108°. No correlation was found between the posterior condylar offset or the tibial slope and the postoperative knee flexion. The most significant predictive factor for postoperative flexion after posterior-stabilized TKR without PCL retention was the preoperative range of flexion, with a linear effect.</abstract><cop>Netherlands</cop><pub>Elsevier B.V</pub><pmid>19954982</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.knee.2009.11.001</doi><tpages>6</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0968-0160
ispartof The knee, 2010-12, Vol.17 (6), p.375-380
issn 0968-0160
1873-5800
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_760234456
source MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals
subjects Aged
Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee - instrumentation
Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee - methods
Biomechanical Phenomena
Biomechanics
Female
Humans
Knee flexion
Knee Joint - physiopathology
Knee Joint - surgery
Knee Prosthesis
Male
Orthopedics
Posterior condylar offset
Posterior Cruciate Ligament - surgery
Postoperative Complications
Prospective Studies
Range of Motion, Articular - physiology
Recovery of Function
Total knee arthroplasty
title Influence of posterior condylar offset on knee flexion after cruciate-sacrificing mobile-bearing total knee replacement: A prospective analysis of 410 consecutive cases
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-14T23%3A44%3A22IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Influence%20of%20posterior%20condylar%20offset%20on%20knee%20flexion%20after%20cruciate-sacrificing%20mobile-bearing%20total%20knee%20replacement:%20A%20prospective%20analysis%20of%20410%20consecutive%20cases&rft.jtitle=The%20knee&rft.au=Bauer,%20T&rft.date=2010-12-01&rft.volume=17&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=375&rft.epage=380&rft.pages=375-380&rft.issn=0968-0160&rft.eissn=1873-5800&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.knee.2009.11.001&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E760234456%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1034986542&rft_id=info:pmid/19954982&rft_els_id=1_s2_0_S0968016009002117&rfr_iscdi=true