A Critical Review of the Ability of Continuous Cardiac Output Monitors to Measure Trends in Cardiac Output

Numerous cardiac output (CO) monitors have been produced that provide continuous rather than intermittent readings. Bland and Altman has become the standard method for validating their performance against older standards. However, the Bland and Altman method only assesses precision and does not asse...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Anesthesia and analgesia 2010-11, Vol.111 (5), p.1180-1192
Hauptverfasser: Critchley, Lester A., Lee, Anna, Ho, Anthony M.-H.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1192
container_issue 5
container_start_page 1180
container_title Anesthesia and analgesia
container_volume 111
creator Critchley, Lester A.
Lee, Anna
Ho, Anthony M.-H.
description Numerous cardiac output (CO) monitors have been produced that provide continuous rather than intermittent readings. Bland and Altman has become the standard method for validating their performance against older standards. However, the Bland and Altman method only assesses precision and does not assess how well a device detects serial changes in CO (trending ability). Currently, there is no consensus on how trending ability, or trend analysis, should be performed. Therefore, we performed a literature review to identify articles published between 1997 and 2009 that compared methods of continuous CO measurement. Identified articles were grouped according to measurement technique and statistical methodology. Articles that analyzed trending ability were reviewed with the aim of finding an acceptable statistical method. Two hundred two articles were identified. The most popular methods were pulse contour (69 articles), Doppler (54), bioimpedance (38), and transpulmonary or continuous thermodilution (27). Forty-one articles addressed trending, and of these only 23 provided an in-depth analysis. Several common statistical themes were identifiedtime plots, regression analysis, Bland and Altman using change in CO (ΔCO), and the 4-quadrant plot, which used direction of change of ΔCO to determine the concordance. This plot was further refined by exclusion of data when values were small. Receiver operating characteristic curves were used to define the exclusion zone. In animal studies, a reliable reference standard such as an aortic flowprobe was frequently used, and regression or time plots could be used to show trending. Clinical studies were more problematic because data collection points were fewer (8–10 per subject). The consensus was to use the 4-quadrant plot with exclusion zones and apply concordance analysis. A concordance rate of >92% when using a 15% zone indicated good trending. A new method of presenting trend data (ΔCO) on a polar plot is proposed. Agreement was shown by the angle with the horizontal axis and ΔCO by the distance from the center. Trending can be assessed by the vertical limits of the data, similar to the Bland and Altman method.
doi_str_mv 10.1213/ANE.0b013e3181f08a5b
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_760230344</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>760230344</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5447-a8042756b62d45fb7c7749f9a41dfc7319860bcd26ec2e896669804d177247f73</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdkV1rFDEUhoNY7Fr9ByK5Ea-m5juTy2WoVWgtlHodMpkTNnV2Zk0yXfrvm6WrheYmvPC8OeQ5CH2i5Jwyyr-tf12ck55QDpy2NJDWyf4NWlHJVKOlad-iFSGEN8wYc4re53xfIyWteodOGdFcCU5X6H6NuxRL9G7Et_AQYY_ngMsG8LqPYyyPh9jNU4nTMi8Zdy4N0Xl8s5TdUvD1PMUyp4zLjK_B5SUBvkswDRnH6RX8AZ0EN2b4eLzP0O_vF3fdj-bq5vJnt75qvBRCN64lgmmpesUGIUOvvdbCBOMEHYLXnJpWkd4PTIFn0BqllKmVgWrNhA6an6Gvz-_u0vx3gVzsNmYP4-gmqF-wWhHGCReikuKZ9GnOOUGwuxS3Lj1aSuxBsq2S7WvJtfb5OGDptzD8L_2zWoEvR8DlKjYkN_mYXzjOtZJSvszfz2OBlP-Myx6S3YAby8aSw5HcNKyujdIamsMGNX8CzyqUig</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>760230344</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>A Critical Review of the Ability of Continuous Cardiac Output Monitors to Measure Trends in Cardiac Output</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Journals@Ovid LWW Legacy Archive</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><creator>Critchley, Lester A. ; Lee, Anna ; Ho, Anthony M.-H.</creator><creatorcontrib>Critchley, Lester A. ; Lee, Anna ; Ho, Anthony M.-H.</creatorcontrib><description>Numerous cardiac output (CO) monitors have been produced that provide continuous rather than intermittent readings. Bland and Altman has become the standard method for validating their performance against older standards. However, the Bland and Altman method only assesses precision and does not assess how well a device detects serial changes in CO (trending ability). Currently, there is no consensus on how trending ability, or trend analysis, should be performed. Therefore, we performed a literature review to identify articles published between 1997 and 2009 that compared methods of continuous CO measurement. Identified articles were grouped according to measurement technique and statistical methodology. Articles that analyzed trending ability were reviewed with the aim of finding an acceptable statistical method. Two hundred two articles were identified. The most popular methods were pulse contour (69 articles), Doppler (54), bioimpedance (38), and transpulmonary or continuous thermodilution (27). Forty-one articles addressed trending, and of these only 23 provided an in-depth analysis. Several common statistical themes were identifiedtime plots, regression analysis, Bland and Altman using change in CO (ΔCO), and the 4-quadrant plot, which used direction of change of ΔCO to determine the concordance. This plot was further refined by exclusion of data when values were small. Receiver operating characteristic curves were used to define the exclusion zone. In animal studies, a reliable reference standard such as an aortic flowprobe was frequently used, and regression or time plots could be used to show trending. Clinical studies were more problematic because data collection points were fewer (8–10 per subject). The consensus was to use the 4-quadrant plot with exclusion zones and apply concordance analysis. A concordance rate of &gt;92% when using a 15% zone indicated good trending. A new method of presenting trend data (ΔCO) on a polar plot is proposed. Agreement was shown by the angle with the horizontal axis and ΔCO by the distance from the center. Trending can be assessed by the vertical limits of the data, similar to the Bland and Altman method.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0003-2999</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1526-7598</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1213/ANE.0b013e3181f08a5b</identifier><identifier>PMID: 20736431</identifier><identifier>CODEN: AACRAT</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Hagerstown, MD: International Anesthesia Research Society</publisher><subject>Anesthesia ; Anesthesia. Intensive care medicine. Transfusions. Cell therapy and gene therapy ; Animals ; Biological and medical sciences ; Cardiac Output ; Electric Impedance ; Equipment Design ; Humans ; Medical sciences ; Models, Statistical ; Monitoring, Physiologic - instrumentation ; Monitoring, Physiologic - trends ; Predictive Value of Tests ; Reproducibility of Results ; ROC Curve ; Signal Processing, Computer-Assisted ; Thermodilution - instrumentation ; Time Factors ; Ultrasonography, Doppler, Pulsed - instrumentation</subject><ispartof>Anesthesia and analgesia, 2010-11, Vol.111 (5), p.1180-1192</ispartof><rights>International Anesthesia Research Society</rights><rights>2015 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5447-a8042756b62d45fb7c7749f9a41dfc7319860bcd26ec2e896669804d177247f73</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5447-a8042756b62d45fb7c7749f9a41dfc7319860bcd26ec2e896669804d177247f73</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf><![CDATA[$$Uhttp://ovidsp.ovid.com/ovidweb.cgi?T=JS&CSC=Y&NEWS=N&PAGE=fulltext&PDF=y&D=ovft&AN=00000539-201011000-00017$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwolterskluwer$$H]]></linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttp://ovidsp.ovid.com/ovidweb.cgi?T=JS&amp;NEWS=n&amp;CSC=Y&amp;PAGE=fulltext&amp;D=ovft&amp;AN=00000539-201011000-00017$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwolterskluwer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>315,781,785,4610,27929,27930,64671,65466</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=23376555$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20736431$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Critchley, Lester A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lee, Anna</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ho, Anthony M.-H.</creatorcontrib><title>A Critical Review of the Ability of Continuous Cardiac Output Monitors to Measure Trends in Cardiac Output</title><title>Anesthesia and analgesia</title><addtitle>Anesth Analg</addtitle><description>Numerous cardiac output (CO) monitors have been produced that provide continuous rather than intermittent readings. Bland and Altman has become the standard method for validating their performance against older standards. However, the Bland and Altman method only assesses precision and does not assess how well a device detects serial changes in CO (trending ability). Currently, there is no consensus on how trending ability, or trend analysis, should be performed. Therefore, we performed a literature review to identify articles published between 1997 and 2009 that compared methods of continuous CO measurement. Identified articles were grouped according to measurement technique and statistical methodology. Articles that analyzed trending ability were reviewed with the aim of finding an acceptable statistical method. Two hundred two articles were identified. The most popular methods were pulse contour (69 articles), Doppler (54), bioimpedance (38), and transpulmonary or continuous thermodilution (27). Forty-one articles addressed trending, and of these only 23 provided an in-depth analysis. Several common statistical themes were identifiedtime plots, regression analysis, Bland and Altman using change in CO (ΔCO), and the 4-quadrant plot, which used direction of change of ΔCO to determine the concordance. This plot was further refined by exclusion of data when values were small. Receiver operating characteristic curves were used to define the exclusion zone. In animal studies, a reliable reference standard such as an aortic flowprobe was frequently used, and regression or time plots could be used to show trending. Clinical studies were more problematic because data collection points were fewer (8–10 per subject). The consensus was to use the 4-quadrant plot with exclusion zones and apply concordance analysis. A concordance rate of &gt;92% when using a 15% zone indicated good trending. A new method of presenting trend data (ΔCO) on a polar plot is proposed. Agreement was shown by the angle with the horizontal axis and ΔCO by the distance from the center. Trending can be assessed by the vertical limits of the data, similar to the Bland and Altman method.</description><subject>Anesthesia</subject><subject>Anesthesia. Intensive care medicine. Transfusions. Cell therapy and gene therapy</subject><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Cardiac Output</subject><subject>Electric Impedance</subject><subject>Equipment Design</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Models, Statistical</subject><subject>Monitoring, Physiologic - instrumentation</subject><subject>Monitoring, Physiologic - trends</subject><subject>Predictive Value of Tests</subject><subject>Reproducibility of Results</subject><subject>ROC Curve</subject><subject>Signal Processing, Computer-Assisted</subject><subject>Thermodilution - instrumentation</subject><subject>Time Factors</subject><subject>Ultrasonography, Doppler, Pulsed - instrumentation</subject><issn>0003-2999</issn><issn>1526-7598</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2010</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNpdkV1rFDEUhoNY7Fr9ByK5Ea-m5juTy2WoVWgtlHodMpkTNnV2Zk0yXfrvm6WrheYmvPC8OeQ5CH2i5Jwyyr-tf12ck55QDpy2NJDWyf4NWlHJVKOlad-iFSGEN8wYc4re53xfIyWteodOGdFcCU5X6H6NuxRL9G7Et_AQYY_ngMsG8LqPYyyPh9jNU4nTMi8Zdy4N0Xl8s5TdUvD1PMUyp4zLjK_B5SUBvkswDRnH6RX8AZ0EN2b4eLzP0O_vF3fdj-bq5vJnt75qvBRCN64lgmmpesUGIUOvvdbCBOMEHYLXnJpWkd4PTIFn0BqllKmVgWrNhA6an6Gvz-_u0vx3gVzsNmYP4-gmqF-wWhHGCReikuKZ9GnOOUGwuxS3Lj1aSuxBsq2S7WvJtfb5OGDptzD8L_2zWoEvR8DlKjYkN_mYXzjOtZJSvszfz2OBlP-Myx6S3YAby8aSw5HcNKyujdIamsMGNX8CzyqUig</recordid><startdate>20101101</startdate><enddate>20101101</enddate><creator>Critchley, Lester A.</creator><creator>Lee, Anna</creator><creator>Ho, Anthony M.-H.</creator><general>International Anesthesia Research Society</general><general>Lippincott Williams &amp; Wilkins</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20101101</creationdate><title>A Critical Review of the Ability of Continuous Cardiac Output Monitors to Measure Trends in Cardiac Output</title><author>Critchley, Lester A. ; Lee, Anna ; Ho, Anthony M.-H.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c5447-a8042756b62d45fb7c7749f9a41dfc7319860bcd26ec2e896669804d177247f73</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2010</creationdate><topic>Anesthesia</topic><topic>Anesthesia. Intensive care medicine. Transfusions. Cell therapy and gene therapy</topic><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Cardiac Output</topic><topic>Electric Impedance</topic><topic>Equipment Design</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Models, Statistical</topic><topic>Monitoring, Physiologic - instrumentation</topic><topic>Monitoring, Physiologic - trends</topic><topic>Predictive Value of Tests</topic><topic>Reproducibility of Results</topic><topic>ROC Curve</topic><topic>Signal Processing, Computer-Assisted</topic><topic>Thermodilution - instrumentation</topic><topic>Time Factors</topic><topic>Ultrasonography, Doppler, Pulsed - instrumentation</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Critchley, Lester A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lee, Anna</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ho, Anthony M.-H.</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Anesthesia and analgesia</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Critchley, Lester A.</au><au>Lee, Anna</au><au>Ho, Anthony M.-H.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>A Critical Review of the Ability of Continuous Cardiac Output Monitors to Measure Trends in Cardiac Output</atitle><jtitle>Anesthesia and analgesia</jtitle><addtitle>Anesth Analg</addtitle><date>2010-11-01</date><risdate>2010</risdate><volume>111</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>1180</spage><epage>1192</epage><pages>1180-1192</pages><issn>0003-2999</issn><eissn>1526-7598</eissn><coden>AACRAT</coden><abstract>Numerous cardiac output (CO) monitors have been produced that provide continuous rather than intermittent readings. Bland and Altman has become the standard method for validating their performance against older standards. However, the Bland and Altman method only assesses precision and does not assess how well a device detects serial changes in CO (trending ability). Currently, there is no consensus on how trending ability, or trend analysis, should be performed. Therefore, we performed a literature review to identify articles published between 1997 and 2009 that compared methods of continuous CO measurement. Identified articles were grouped according to measurement technique and statistical methodology. Articles that analyzed trending ability were reviewed with the aim of finding an acceptable statistical method. Two hundred two articles were identified. The most popular methods were pulse contour (69 articles), Doppler (54), bioimpedance (38), and transpulmonary or continuous thermodilution (27). Forty-one articles addressed trending, and of these only 23 provided an in-depth analysis. Several common statistical themes were identifiedtime plots, regression analysis, Bland and Altman using change in CO (ΔCO), and the 4-quadrant plot, which used direction of change of ΔCO to determine the concordance. This plot was further refined by exclusion of data when values were small. Receiver operating characteristic curves were used to define the exclusion zone. In animal studies, a reliable reference standard such as an aortic flowprobe was frequently used, and regression or time plots could be used to show trending. Clinical studies were more problematic because data collection points were fewer (8–10 per subject). The consensus was to use the 4-quadrant plot with exclusion zones and apply concordance analysis. A concordance rate of &gt;92% when using a 15% zone indicated good trending. A new method of presenting trend data (ΔCO) on a polar plot is proposed. Agreement was shown by the angle with the horizontal axis and ΔCO by the distance from the center. Trending can be assessed by the vertical limits of the data, similar to the Bland and Altman method.</abstract><cop>Hagerstown, MD</cop><pub>International Anesthesia Research Society</pub><pmid>20736431</pmid><doi>10.1213/ANE.0b013e3181f08a5b</doi><tpages>13</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0003-2999
ispartof Anesthesia and analgesia, 2010-11, Vol.111 (5), p.1180-1192
issn 0003-2999
1526-7598
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_760230344
source MEDLINE; Journals@Ovid LWW Legacy Archive; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals
subjects Anesthesia
Anesthesia. Intensive care medicine. Transfusions. Cell therapy and gene therapy
Animals
Biological and medical sciences
Cardiac Output
Electric Impedance
Equipment Design
Humans
Medical sciences
Models, Statistical
Monitoring, Physiologic - instrumentation
Monitoring, Physiologic - trends
Predictive Value of Tests
Reproducibility of Results
ROC Curve
Signal Processing, Computer-Assisted
Thermodilution - instrumentation
Time Factors
Ultrasonography, Doppler, Pulsed - instrumentation
title A Critical Review of the Ability of Continuous Cardiac Output Monitors to Measure Trends in Cardiac Output
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-13T02%3A41%3A10IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20Critical%20Review%20of%20the%20Ability%20of%20Continuous%20Cardiac%20Output%20Monitors%20to%20Measure%20Trends%20in%20Cardiac%20Output&rft.jtitle=Anesthesia%20and%20analgesia&rft.au=Critchley,%20Lester%20A.&rft.date=2010-11-01&rft.volume=111&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=1180&rft.epage=1192&rft.pages=1180-1192&rft.issn=0003-2999&rft.eissn=1526-7598&rft.coden=AACRAT&rft_id=info:doi/10.1213/ANE.0b013e3181f08a5b&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E760230344%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=760230344&rft_id=info:pmid/20736431&rfr_iscdi=true