A Critical Review of the Ability of Continuous Cardiac Output Monitors to Measure Trends in Cardiac Output
Numerous cardiac output (CO) monitors have been produced that provide continuous rather than intermittent readings. Bland and Altman has become the standard method for validating their performance against older standards. However, the Bland and Altman method only assesses precision and does not asse...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Anesthesia and analgesia 2010-11, Vol.111 (5), p.1180-1192 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 1192 |
---|---|
container_issue | 5 |
container_start_page | 1180 |
container_title | Anesthesia and analgesia |
container_volume | 111 |
creator | Critchley, Lester A. Lee, Anna Ho, Anthony M.-H. |
description | Numerous cardiac output (CO) monitors have been produced that provide continuous rather than intermittent readings. Bland and Altman has become the standard method for validating their performance against older standards. However, the Bland and Altman method only assesses precision and does not assess how well a device detects serial changes in CO (trending ability). Currently, there is no consensus on how trending ability, or trend analysis, should be performed. Therefore, we performed a literature review to identify articles published between 1997 and 2009 that compared methods of continuous CO measurement. Identified articles were grouped according to measurement technique and statistical methodology. Articles that analyzed trending ability were reviewed with the aim of finding an acceptable statistical method. Two hundred two articles were identified. The most popular methods were pulse contour (69 articles), Doppler (54), bioimpedance (38), and transpulmonary or continuous thermodilution (27). Forty-one articles addressed trending, and of these only 23 provided an in-depth analysis. Several common statistical themes were identifiedtime plots, regression analysis, Bland and Altman using change in CO (ΔCO), and the 4-quadrant plot, which used direction of change of ΔCO to determine the concordance. This plot was further refined by exclusion of data when values were small. Receiver operating characteristic curves were used to define the exclusion zone. In animal studies, a reliable reference standard such as an aortic flowprobe was frequently used, and regression or time plots could be used to show trending. Clinical studies were more problematic because data collection points were fewer (8–10 per subject). The consensus was to use the 4-quadrant plot with exclusion zones and apply concordance analysis. A concordance rate of >92% when using a 15% zone indicated good trending. A new method of presenting trend data (ΔCO) on a polar plot is proposed. Agreement was shown by the angle with the horizontal axis and ΔCO by the distance from the center. Trending can be assessed by the vertical limits of the data, similar to the Bland and Altman method. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1213/ANE.0b013e3181f08a5b |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_760230344</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>760230344</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5447-a8042756b62d45fb7c7749f9a41dfc7319860bcd26ec2e896669804d177247f73</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdkV1rFDEUhoNY7Fr9ByK5Ea-m5juTy2WoVWgtlHodMpkTNnV2Zk0yXfrvm6WrheYmvPC8OeQ5CH2i5Jwyyr-tf12ck55QDpy2NJDWyf4NWlHJVKOlad-iFSGEN8wYc4re53xfIyWteodOGdFcCU5X6H6NuxRL9G7Et_AQYY_ngMsG8LqPYyyPh9jNU4nTMi8Zdy4N0Xl8s5TdUvD1PMUyp4zLjK_B5SUBvkswDRnH6RX8AZ0EN2b4eLzP0O_vF3fdj-bq5vJnt75qvBRCN64lgmmpesUGIUOvvdbCBOMEHYLXnJpWkd4PTIFn0BqllKmVgWrNhA6an6Gvz-_u0vx3gVzsNmYP4-gmqF-wWhHGCReikuKZ9GnOOUGwuxS3Lj1aSuxBsq2S7WvJtfb5OGDptzD8L_2zWoEvR8DlKjYkN_mYXzjOtZJSvszfz2OBlP-Myx6S3YAby8aSw5HcNKyujdIamsMGNX8CzyqUig</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>760230344</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>A Critical Review of the Ability of Continuous Cardiac Output Monitors to Measure Trends in Cardiac Output</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Journals@Ovid LWW Legacy Archive</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><creator>Critchley, Lester A. ; Lee, Anna ; Ho, Anthony M.-H.</creator><creatorcontrib>Critchley, Lester A. ; Lee, Anna ; Ho, Anthony M.-H.</creatorcontrib><description>Numerous cardiac output (CO) monitors have been produced that provide continuous rather than intermittent readings. Bland and Altman has become the standard method for validating their performance against older standards. However, the Bland and Altman method only assesses precision and does not assess how well a device detects serial changes in CO (trending ability). Currently, there is no consensus on how trending ability, or trend analysis, should be performed. Therefore, we performed a literature review to identify articles published between 1997 and 2009 that compared methods of continuous CO measurement. Identified articles were grouped according to measurement technique and statistical methodology. Articles that analyzed trending ability were reviewed with the aim of finding an acceptable statistical method. Two hundred two articles were identified. The most popular methods were pulse contour (69 articles), Doppler (54), bioimpedance (38), and transpulmonary or continuous thermodilution (27). Forty-one articles addressed trending, and of these only 23 provided an in-depth analysis. Several common statistical themes were identifiedtime plots, regression analysis, Bland and Altman using change in CO (ΔCO), and the 4-quadrant plot, which used direction of change of ΔCO to determine the concordance. This plot was further refined by exclusion of data when values were small. Receiver operating characteristic curves were used to define the exclusion zone. In animal studies, a reliable reference standard such as an aortic flowprobe was frequently used, and regression or time plots could be used to show trending. Clinical studies were more problematic because data collection points were fewer (8–10 per subject). The consensus was to use the 4-quadrant plot with exclusion zones and apply concordance analysis. A concordance rate of >92% when using a 15% zone indicated good trending. A new method of presenting trend data (ΔCO) on a polar plot is proposed. Agreement was shown by the angle with the horizontal axis and ΔCO by the distance from the center. Trending can be assessed by the vertical limits of the data, similar to the Bland and Altman method.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0003-2999</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1526-7598</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1213/ANE.0b013e3181f08a5b</identifier><identifier>PMID: 20736431</identifier><identifier>CODEN: AACRAT</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Hagerstown, MD: International Anesthesia Research Society</publisher><subject>Anesthesia ; Anesthesia. Intensive care medicine. Transfusions. Cell therapy and gene therapy ; Animals ; Biological and medical sciences ; Cardiac Output ; Electric Impedance ; Equipment Design ; Humans ; Medical sciences ; Models, Statistical ; Monitoring, Physiologic - instrumentation ; Monitoring, Physiologic - trends ; Predictive Value of Tests ; Reproducibility of Results ; ROC Curve ; Signal Processing, Computer-Assisted ; Thermodilution - instrumentation ; Time Factors ; Ultrasonography, Doppler, Pulsed - instrumentation</subject><ispartof>Anesthesia and analgesia, 2010-11, Vol.111 (5), p.1180-1192</ispartof><rights>International Anesthesia Research Society</rights><rights>2015 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5447-a8042756b62d45fb7c7749f9a41dfc7319860bcd26ec2e896669804d177247f73</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5447-a8042756b62d45fb7c7749f9a41dfc7319860bcd26ec2e896669804d177247f73</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf><![CDATA[$$Uhttp://ovidsp.ovid.com/ovidweb.cgi?T=JS&CSC=Y&NEWS=N&PAGE=fulltext&PDF=y&D=ovft&AN=00000539-201011000-00017$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwolterskluwer$$H]]></linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttp://ovidsp.ovid.com/ovidweb.cgi?T=JS&NEWS=n&CSC=Y&PAGE=fulltext&D=ovft&AN=00000539-201011000-00017$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwolterskluwer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>315,781,785,4610,27929,27930,64671,65466</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=23376555$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20736431$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Critchley, Lester A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lee, Anna</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ho, Anthony M.-H.</creatorcontrib><title>A Critical Review of the Ability of Continuous Cardiac Output Monitors to Measure Trends in Cardiac Output</title><title>Anesthesia and analgesia</title><addtitle>Anesth Analg</addtitle><description>Numerous cardiac output (CO) monitors have been produced that provide continuous rather than intermittent readings. Bland and Altman has become the standard method for validating their performance against older standards. However, the Bland and Altman method only assesses precision and does not assess how well a device detects serial changes in CO (trending ability). Currently, there is no consensus on how trending ability, or trend analysis, should be performed. Therefore, we performed a literature review to identify articles published between 1997 and 2009 that compared methods of continuous CO measurement. Identified articles were grouped according to measurement technique and statistical methodology. Articles that analyzed trending ability were reviewed with the aim of finding an acceptable statistical method. Two hundred two articles were identified. The most popular methods were pulse contour (69 articles), Doppler (54), bioimpedance (38), and transpulmonary or continuous thermodilution (27). Forty-one articles addressed trending, and of these only 23 provided an in-depth analysis. Several common statistical themes were identifiedtime plots, regression analysis, Bland and Altman using change in CO (ΔCO), and the 4-quadrant plot, which used direction of change of ΔCO to determine the concordance. This plot was further refined by exclusion of data when values were small. Receiver operating characteristic curves were used to define the exclusion zone. In animal studies, a reliable reference standard such as an aortic flowprobe was frequently used, and regression or time plots could be used to show trending. Clinical studies were more problematic because data collection points were fewer (8–10 per subject). The consensus was to use the 4-quadrant plot with exclusion zones and apply concordance analysis. A concordance rate of >92% when using a 15% zone indicated good trending. A new method of presenting trend data (ΔCO) on a polar plot is proposed. Agreement was shown by the angle with the horizontal axis and ΔCO by the distance from the center. Trending can be assessed by the vertical limits of the data, similar to the Bland and Altman method.</description><subject>Anesthesia</subject><subject>Anesthesia. Intensive care medicine. Transfusions. Cell therapy and gene therapy</subject><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Cardiac Output</subject><subject>Electric Impedance</subject><subject>Equipment Design</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Models, Statistical</subject><subject>Monitoring, Physiologic - instrumentation</subject><subject>Monitoring, Physiologic - trends</subject><subject>Predictive Value of Tests</subject><subject>Reproducibility of Results</subject><subject>ROC Curve</subject><subject>Signal Processing, Computer-Assisted</subject><subject>Thermodilution - instrumentation</subject><subject>Time Factors</subject><subject>Ultrasonography, Doppler, Pulsed - instrumentation</subject><issn>0003-2999</issn><issn>1526-7598</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2010</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNpdkV1rFDEUhoNY7Fr9ByK5Ea-m5juTy2WoVWgtlHodMpkTNnV2Zk0yXfrvm6WrheYmvPC8OeQ5CH2i5Jwyyr-tf12ck55QDpy2NJDWyf4NWlHJVKOlad-iFSGEN8wYc4re53xfIyWteodOGdFcCU5X6H6NuxRL9G7Et_AQYY_ngMsG8LqPYyyPh9jNU4nTMi8Zdy4N0Xl8s5TdUvD1PMUyp4zLjK_B5SUBvkswDRnH6RX8AZ0EN2b4eLzP0O_vF3fdj-bq5vJnt75qvBRCN64lgmmpesUGIUOvvdbCBOMEHYLXnJpWkd4PTIFn0BqllKmVgWrNhA6an6Gvz-_u0vx3gVzsNmYP4-gmqF-wWhHGCReikuKZ9GnOOUGwuxS3Lj1aSuxBsq2S7WvJtfb5OGDptzD8L_2zWoEvR8DlKjYkN_mYXzjOtZJSvszfz2OBlP-Myx6S3YAby8aSw5HcNKyujdIamsMGNX8CzyqUig</recordid><startdate>20101101</startdate><enddate>20101101</enddate><creator>Critchley, Lester A.</creator><creator>Lee, Anna</creator><creator>Ho, Anthony M.-H.</creator><general>International Anesthesia Research Society</general><general>Lippincott Williams & Wilkins</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20101101</creationdate><title>A Critical Review of the Ability of Continuous Cardiac Output Monitors to Measure Trends in Cardiac Output</title><author>Critchley, Lester A. ; Lee, Anna ; Ho, Anthony M.-H.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c5447-a8042756b62d45fb7c7749f9a41dfc7319860bcd26ec2e896669804d177247f73</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2010</creationdate><topic>Anesthesia</topic><topic>Anesthesia. Intensive care medicine. Transfusions. Cell therapy and gene therapy</topic><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Cardiac Output</topic><topic>Electric Impedance</topic><topic>Equipment Design</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Models, Statistical</topic><topic>Monitoring, Physiologic - instrumentation</topic><topic>Monitoring, Physiologic - trends</topic><topic>Predictive Value of Tests</topic><topic>Reproducibility of Results</topic><topic>ROC Curve</topic><topic>Signal Processing, Computer-Assisted</topic><topic>Thermodilution - instrumentation</topic><topic>Time Factors</topic><topic>Ultrasonography, Doppler, Pulsed - instrumentation</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Critchley, Lester A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lee, Anna</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ho, Anthony M.-H.</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Anesthesia and analgesia</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Critchley, Lester A.</au><au>Lee, Anna</au><au>Ho, Anthony M.-H.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>A Critical Review of the Ability of Continuous Cardiac Output Monitors to Measure Trends in Cardiac Output</atitle><jtitle>Anesthesia and analgesia</jtitle><addtitle>Anesth Analg</addtitle><date>2010-11-01</date><risdate>2010</risdate><volume>111</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>1180</spage><epage>1192</epage><pages>1180-1192</pages><issn>0003-2999</issn><eissn>1526-7598</eissn><coden>AACRAT</coden><abstract>Numerous cardiac output (CO) monitors have been produced that provide continuous rather than intermittent readings. Bland and Altman has become the standard method for validating their performance against older standards. However, the Bland and Altman method only assesses precision and does not assess how well a device detects serial changes in CO (trending ability). Currently, there is no consensus on how trending ability, or trend analysis, should be performed. Therefore, we performed a literature review to identify articles published between 1997 and 2009 that compared methods of continuous CO measurement. Identified articles were grouped according to measurement technique and statistical methodology. Articles that analyzed trending ability were reviewed with the aim of finding an acceptable statistical method. Two hundred two articles were identified. The most popular methods were pulse contour (69 articles), Doppler (54), bioimpedance (38), and transpulmonary or continuous thermodilution (27). Forty-one articles addressed trending, and of these only 23 provided an in-depth analysis. Several common statistical themes were identifiedtime plots, regression analysis, Bland and Altman using change in CO (ΔCO), and the 4-quadrant plot, which used direction of change of ΔCO to determine the concordance. This plot was further refined by exclusion of data when values were small. Receiver operating characteristic curves were used to define the exclusion zone. In animal studies, a reliable reference standard such as an aortic flowprobe was frequently used, and regression or time plots could be used to show trending. Clinical studies were more problematic because data collection points were fewer (8–10 per subject). The consensus was to use the 4-quadrant plot with exclusion zones and apply concordance analysis. A concordance rate of >92% when using a 15% zone indicated good trending. A new method of presenting trend data (ΔCO) on a polar plot is proposed. Agreement was shown by the angle with the horizontal axis and ΔCO by the distance from the center. Trending can be assessed by the vertical limits of the data, similar to the Bland and Altman method.</abstract><cop>Hagerstown, MD</cop><pub>International Anesthesia Research Society</pub><pmid>20736431</pmid><doi>10.1213/ANE.0b013e3181f08a5b</doi><tpages>13</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0003-2999 |
ispartof | Anesthesia and analgesia, 2010-11, Vol.111 (5), p.1180-1192 |
issn | 0003-2999 1526-7598 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_760230344 |
source | MEDLINE; Journals@Ovid LWW Legacy Archive; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals |
subjects | Anesthesia Anesthesia. Intensive care medicine. Transfusions. Cell therapy and gene therapy Animals Biological and medical sciences Cardiac Output Electric Impedance Equipment Design Humans Medical sciences Models, Statistical Monitoring, Physiologic - instrumentation Monitoring, Physiologic - trends Predictive Value of Tests Reproducibility of Results ROC Curve Signal Processing, Computer-Assisted Thermodilution - instrumentation Time Factors Ultrasonography, Doppler, Pulsed - instrumentation |
title | A Critical Review of the Ability of Continuous Cardiac Output Monitors to Measure Trends in Cardiac Output |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-13T02%3A41%3A10IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20Critical%20Review%20of%20the%20Ability%20of%20Continuous%20Cardiac%20Output%20Monitors%20to%20Measure%20Trends%20in%20Cardiac%20Output&rft.jtitle=Anesthesia%20and%20analgesia&rft.au=Critchley,%20Lester%20A.&rft.date=2010-11-01&rft.volume=111&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=1180&rft.epage=1192&rft.pages=1180-1192&rft.issn=0003-2999&rft.eissn=1526-7598&rft.coden=AACRAT&rft_id=info:doi/10.1213/ANE.0b013e3181f08a5b&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E760230344%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=760230344&rft_id=info:pmid/20736431&rfr_iscdi=true |