Gate keepers of EU food safety: Four states lead on notification patterns and effectiveness

The EU RASFF database has been used to provide information on trends in food notifications. The major focus of previous reports has been on either the health hazards arising from various contaminants found in foodstuff or producers of these faulty products. To complement these analyses, the aim of t...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Food and chemical toxicology 2010-07, Vol.48 (7), p.1957-1964
Hauptverfasser: Petróczi, A., Taylor, G., Nepusz, T., Naughton, D.P.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1964
container_issue 7
container_start_page 1957
container_title Food and chemical toxicology
container_volume 48
creator Petróczi, A.
Taylor, G.
Nepusz, T.
Naughton, D.P.
description The EU RASFF database has been used to provide information on trends in food notifications. The major focus of previous reports has been on either the health hazards arising from various contaminants found in foodstuff or producers of these faulty products. To complement these analyses, the aim of this paper is to examine the food notifications, recorded via the RASFF between 2000 and 2009, from the detectors’ point of view and to compare and contrast detecting activities of those playing a key role in guarding food safety and security in the EU. Data were scrutinized using network analysis to capture underlying pattern in the EU context and detailed descriptive statistics to generate an in-depth view. The results revealed that 60% of the notifications were made by Italy, Germany, the UK and Spain, with the remaining 40% shared among 26 other countries and Commission Services. A distinct reporting pattern was observed between these key countries with the Netherlands showing vigilance above and beyond that expected based on its population, suggesting that countries with major ports might secure food safety in their own country as well as guarding the EU’s food market. The ethnic composition may also influence the detection patterns.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.fct.2010.04.043
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_760197169</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0278691510002577</els_id><sourcerecordid>748938838</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c438t-c51314bc696511c9d804b062ac792fe2610bfd41169aa346c289010ba5f5b4aa3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkcFuEzEQhi1ERdPCA3ABXxCnTe2112vTE6raglSph5ITB8vrHSOHzTrYTqW-PRMlhRtIM7Jm9P3j8W9C3nK25Iyri_Uy-LpsGdZMYogXZMF1LxolOv6SLFjb60YZ3p2Ss1LWjLGe9-oVOW2R7VjfL8j3W1eB_gTYQi40BXq9oiGlkRYXoD59ojdpl2mpSBU6gRtpmumcagzRuxqx2LpaIc-FunmkEAL4Gh9hhlJek5PgpgJvjuc5Wd1cf7v60tzd3369-nzXeCl0bXzHBZeDV0Z1nHszaiYHplrne9MGaBVnQxgl58o4J6TyrTb45MF1oRskts7Jx8PcbU6_dlCq3cTiYZrcDGlXbK8YNz3K_09KbYTWQiPJD6TPqZQMwW5z3Lj8ZDmze_Pt2qL5dm--ZRJDoObdcfpu2MD4R_HsNgIfjoAr3k0hu9nH8pdrjRadkci9P3DBJet-ZGRWD3hTxzCFbPfrXR4IQF8fI2RbfITZwxgzfoAdU_zHor8B5v-pvQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>748938838</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Gate keepers of EU food safety: Four states lead on notification patterns and effectiveness</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)</source><creator>Petróczi, A. ; Taylor, G. ; Nepusz, T. ; Naughton, D.P.</creator><creatorcontrib>Petróczi, A. ; Taylor, G. ; Nepusz, T. ; Naughton, D.P.</creatorcontrib><description>The EU RASFF database has been used to provide information on trends in food notifications. The major focus of previous reports has been on either the health hazards arising from various contaminants found in foodstuff or producers of these faulty products. To complement these analyses, the aim of this paper is to examine the food notifications, recorded via the RASFF between 2000 and 2009, from the detectors’ point of view and to compare and contrast detecting activities of those playing a key role in guarding food safety and security in the EU. Data were scrutinized using network analysis to capture underlying pattern in the EU context and detailed descriptive statistics to generate an in-depth view. The results revealed that 60% of the notifications were made by Italy, Germany, the UK and Spain, with the remaining 40% shared among 26 other countries and Commission Services. A distinct reporting pattern was observed between these key countries with the Netherlands showing vigilance above and beyond that expected based on its population, suggesting that countries with major ports might secure food safety in their own country as well as guarding the EU’s food market. The ethnic composition may also influence the detection patterns.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0278-6915</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-6351</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.fct.2010.04.043</identifier><identifier>PMID: 20435077</identifier><identifier>CODEN: FCTOD7</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Biological and medical sciences ; Border control ; Complement ; Data Collection ; Databases, Factual ; Detector ; Detectors ; Disease Notification - standards ; European Union ; Food Contamination - legislation &amp; jurisprudence ; Food Contamination - prevention &amp; control ; Food safety ; Food toxicology ; Foodborne Diseases - epidemiology ; Foodborne Diseases - prevention &amp; control ; Foods ; health hazards ; Humans ; Legislation, Food ; Market control ; Markets ; Medical sciences ; RASFF ; Reporting ; Safety ; Security ; Statistics ; Toxicology ; Trend analysis</subject><ispartof>Food and chemical toxicology, 2010-07, Vol.48 (7), p.1957-1964</ispartof><rights>2010 Elsevier Ltd</rights><rights>2015 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>2010 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c438t-c51314bc696511c9d804b062ac792fe2610bfd41169aa346c289010ba5f5b4aa3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c438t-c51314bc696511c9d804b062ac792fe2610bfd41169aa346c289010ba5f5b4aa3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.fct.2010.04.043$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3550,27924,27925,45995</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=22983594$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20435077$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Petróczi, A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Taylor, G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nepusz, T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Naughton, D.P.</creatorcontrib><title>Gate keepers of EU food safety: Four states lead on notification patterns and effectiveness</title><title>Food and chemical toxicology</title><addtitle>Food Chem Toxicol</addtitle><description>The EU RASFF database has been used to provide information on trends in food notifications. The major focus of previous reports has been on either the health hazards arising from various contaminants found in foodstuff or producers of these faulty products. To complement these analyses, the aim of this paper is to examine the food notifications, recorded via the RASFF between 2000 and 2009, from the detectors’ point of view and to compare and contrast detecting activities of those playing a key role in guarding food safety and security in the EU. Data were scrutinized using network analysis to capture underlying pattern in the EU context and detailed descriptive statistics to generate an in-depth view. The results revealed that 60% of the notifications were made by Italy, Germany, the UK and Spain, with the remaining 40% shared among 26 other countries and Commission Services. A distinct reporting pattern was observed between these key countries with the Netherlands showing vigilance above and beyond that expected based on its population, suggesting that countries with major ports might secure food safety in their own country as well as guarding the EU’s food market. The ethnic composition may also influence the detection patterns.</description><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Border control</subject><subject>Complement</subject><subject>Data Collection</subject><subject>Databases, Factual</subject><subject>Detector</subject><subject>Detectors</subject><subject>Disease Notification - standards</subject><subject>European Union</subject><subject>Food Contamination - legislation &amp; jurisprudence</subject><subject>Food Contamination - prevention &amp; control</subject><subject>Food safety</subject><subject>Food toxicology</subject><subject>Foodborne Diseases - epidemiology</subject><subject>Foodborne Diseases - prevention &amp; control</subject><subject>Foods</subject><subject>health hazards</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Legislation, Food</subject><subject>Market control</subject><subject>Markets</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>RASFF</subject><subject>Reporting</subject><subject>Safety</subject><subject>Security</subject><subject>Statistics</subject><subject>Toxicology</subject><subject>Trend analysis</subject><issn>0278-6915</issn><issn>1873-6351</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2010</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkcFuEzEQhi1ERdPCA3ABXxCnTe2112vTE6raglSph5ITB8vrHSOHzTrYTqW-PRMlhRtIM7Jm9P3j8W9C3nK25Iyri_Uy-LpsGdZMYogXZMF1LxolOv6SLFjb60YZ3p2Ss1LWjLGe9-oVOW2R7VjfL8j3W1eB_gTYQi40BXq9oiGlkRYXoD59ojdpl2mpSBU6gRtpmumcagzRuxqx2LpaIc-FunmkEAL4Gh9hhlJek5PgpgJvjuc5Wd1cf7v60tzd3369-nzXeCl0bXzHBZeDV0Z1nHszaiYHplrne9MGaBVnQxgl58o4J6TyrTb45MF1oRskts7Jx8PcbU6_dlCq3cTiYZrcDGlXbK8YNz3K_09KbYTWQiPJD6TPqZQMwW5z3Lj8ZDmze_Pt2qL5dm--ZRJDoObdcfpu2MD4R_HsNgIfjoAr3k0hu9nH8pdrjRadkci9P3DBJet-ZGRWD3hTxzCFbPfrXR4IQF8fI2RbfITZwxgzfoAdU_zHor8B5v-pvQ</recordid><startdate>20100701</startdate><enddate>20100701</enddate><creator>Petróczi, A.</creator><creator>Taylor, G.</creator><creator>Nepusz, T.</creator><creator>Naughton, D.P.</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Elsevier</general><scope>FBQ</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>F28</scope><scope>FR3</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20100701</creationdate><title>Gate keepers of EU food safety: Four states lead on notification patterns and effectiveness</title><author>Petróczi, A. ; Taylor, G. ; Nepusz, T. ; Naughton, D.P.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c438t-c51314bc696511c9d804b062ac792fe2610bfd41169aa346c289010ba5f5b4aa3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2010</creationdate><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Border control</topic><topic>Complement</topic><topic>Data Collection</topic><topic>Databases, Factual</topic><topic>Detector</topic><topic>Detectors</topic><topic>Disease Notification - standards</topic><topic>European Union</topic><topic>Food Contamination - legislation &amp; jurisprudence</topic><topic>Food Contamination - prevention &amp; control</topic><topic>Food safety</topic><topic>Food toxicology</topic><topic>Foodborne Diseases - epidemiology</topic><topic>Foodborne Diseases - prevention &amp; control</topic><topic>Foods</topic><topic>health hazards</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Legislation, Food</topic><topic>Market control</topic><topic>Markets</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>RASFF</topic><topic>Reporting</topic><topic>Safety</topic><topic>Security</topic><topic>Statistics</topic><topic>Toxicology</topic><topic>Trend analysis</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Petróczi, A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Taylor, G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nepusz, T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Naughton, D.P.</creatorcontrib><collection>AGRIS</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ANTE: Abstracts in New Technology &amp; Engineering</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><jtitle>Food and chemical toxicology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Petróczi, A.</au><au>Taylor, G.</au><au>Nepusz, T.</au><au>Naughton, D.P.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Gate keepers of EU food safety: Four states lead on notification patterns and effectiveness</atitle><jtitle>Food and chemical toxicology</jtitle><addtitle>Food Chem Toxicol</addtitle><date>2010-07-01</date><risdate>2010</risdate><volume>48</volume><issue>7</issue><spage>1957</spage><epage>1964</epage><pages>1957-1964</pages><issn>0278-6915</issn><eissn>1873-6351</eissn><coden>FCTOD7</coden><abstract>The EU RASFF database has been used to provide information on trends in food notifications. The major focus of previous reports has been on either the health hazards arising from various contaminants found in foodstuff or producers of these faulty products. To complement these analyses, the aim of this paper is to examine the food notifications, recorded via the RASFF between 2000 and 2009, from the detectors’ point of view and to compare and contrast detecting activities of those playing a key role in guarding food safety and security in the EU. Data were scrutinized using network analysis to capture underlying pattern in the EU context and detailed descriptive statistics to generate an in-depth view. The results revealed that 60% of the notifications were made by Italy, Germany, the UK and Spain, with the remaining 40% shared among 26 other countries and Commission Services. A distinct reporting pattern was observed between these key countries with the Netherlands showing vigilance above and beyond that expected based on its population, suggesting that countries with major ports might secure food safety in their own country as well as guarding the EU’s food market. The ethnic composition may also influence the detection patterns.</abstract><cop>Oxford</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>20435077</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.fct.2010.04.043</doi><tpages>8</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0278-6915
ispartof Food and chemical toxicology, 2010-07, Vol.48 (7), p.1957-1964
issn 0278-6915
1873-6351
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_760197169
source MEDLINE; Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)
subjects Biological and medical sciences
Border control
Complement
Data Collection
Databases, Factual
Detector
Detectors
Disease Notification - standards
European Union
Food Contamination - legislation & jurisprudence
Food Contamination - prevention & control
Food safety
Food toxicology
Foodborne Diseases - epidemiology
Foodborne Diseases - prevention & control
Foods
health hazards
Humans
Legislation, Food
Market control
Markets
Medical sciences
RASFF
Reporting
Safety
Security
Statistics
Toxicology
Trend analysis
title Gate keepers of EU food safety: Four states lead on notification patterns and effectiveness
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-20T00%3A47%3A14IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Gate%20keepers%20of%20EU%20food%20safety:%20Four%20states%20lead%20on%20notification%20patterns%20and%20effectiveness&rft.jtitle=Food%20and%20chemical%20toxicology&rft.au=Petr%C3%B3czi,%20A.&rft.date=2010-07-01&rft.volume=48&rft.issue=7&rft.spage=1957&rft.epage=1964&rft.pages=1957-1964&rft.issn=0278-6915&rft.eissn=1873-6351&rft.coden=FCTOD7&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.fct.2010.04.043&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E748938838%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=748938838&rft_id=info:pmid/20435077&rft_els_id=S0278691510002577&rfr_iscdi=true