Gate keepers of EU food safety: Four states lead on notification patterns and effectiveness
The EU RASFF database has been used to provide information on trends in food notifications. The major focus of previous reports has been on either the health hazards arising from various contaminants found in foodstuff or producers of these faulty products. To complement these analyses, the aim of t...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Food and chemical toxicology 2010-07, Vol.48 (7), p.1957-1964 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 1964 |
---|---|
container_issue | 7 |
container_start_page | 1957 |
container_title | Food and chemical toxicology |
container_volume | 48 |
creator | Petróczi, A. Taylor, G. Nepusz, T. Naughton, D.P. |
description | The EU RASFF database has been used to provide information on trends in food notifications. The major focus of previous reports has been on either the health hazards arising from various contaminants found in foodstuff or producers of these faulty products. To complement these analyses, the aim of this paper is to examine the food notifications, recorded via the RASFF between 2000 and 2009, from the detectors’ point of view and to compare and contrast detecting activities of those playing a key role in guarding food safety and security in the EU. Data were scrutinized using network analysis to capture underlying pattern in the EU context and detailed descriptive statistics to generate an in-depth view. The results revealed that 60% of the notifications were made by Italy, Germany, the UK and Spain, with the remaining 40% shared among 26 other countries and Commission Services. A distinct reporting pattern was observed between these key countries with the Netherlands showing vigilance above and beyond that expected based on its population, suggesting that countries with major ports might secure food safety in their own country as well as guarding the EU’s food market. The ethnic composition may also influence the detection patterns. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.fct.2010.04.043 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_760197169</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0278691510002577</els_id><sourcerecordid>748938838</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c438t-c51314bc696511c9d804b062ac792fe2610bfd41169aa346c289010ba5f5b4aa3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkcFuEzEQhi1ERdPCA3ABXxCnTe2112vTE6raglSph5ITB8vrHSOHzTrYTqW-PRMlhRtIM7Jm9P3j8W9C3nK25Iyri_Uy-LpsGdZMYogXZMF1LxolOv6SLFjb60YZ3p2Ss1LWjLGe9-oVOW2R7VjfL8j3W1eB_gTYQi40BXq9oiGlkRYXoD59ojdpl2mpSBU6gRtpmumcagzRuxqx2LpaIc-FunmkEAL4Gh9hhlJek5PgpgJvjuc5Wd1cf7v60tzd3369-nzXeCl0bXzHBZeDV0Z1nHszaiYHplrne9MGaBVnQxgl58o4J6TyrTb45MF1oRskts7Jx8PcbU6_dlCq3cTiYZrcDGlXbK8YNz3K_09KbYTWQiPJD6TPqZQMwW5z3Lj8ZDmze_Pt2qL5dm--ZRJDoObdcfpu2MD4R_HsNgIfjoAr3k0hu9nH8pdrjRadkci9P3DBJet-ZGRWD3hTxzCFbPfrXR4IQF8fI2RbfITZwxgzfoAdU_zHor8B5v-pvQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>748938838</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Gate keepers of EU food safety: Four states lead on notification patterns and effectiveness</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)</source><creator>Petróczi, A. ; Taylor, G. ; Nepusz, T. ; Naughton, D.P.</creator><creatorcontrib>Petróczi, A. ; Taylor, G. ; Nepusz, T. ; Naughton, D.P.</creatorcontrib><description>The EU RASFF database has been used to provide information on trends in food notifications. The major focus of previous reports has been on either the health hazards arising from various contaminants found in foodstuff or producers of these faulty products. To complement these analyses, the aim of this paper is to examine the food notifications, recorded via the RASFF between 2000 and 2009, from the detectors’ point of view and to compare and contrast detecting activities of those playing a key role in guarding food safety and security in the EU. Data were scrutinized using network analysis to capture underlying pattern in the EU context and detailed descriptive statistics to generate an in-depth view. The results revealed that 60% of the notifications were made by Italy, Germany, the UK and Spain, with the remaining 40% shared among 26 other countries and Commission Services. A distinct reporting pattern was observed between these key countries with the Netherlands showing vigilance above and beyond that expected based on its population, suggesting that countries with major ports might secure food safety in their own country as well as guarding the EU’s food market. The ethnic composition may also influence the detection patterns.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0278-6915</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-6351</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.fct.2010.04.043</identifier><identifier>PMID: 20435077</identifier><identifier>CODEN: FCTOD7</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Biological and medical sciences ; Border control ; Complement ; Data Collection ; Databases, Factual ; Detector ; Detectors ; Disease Notification - standards ; European Union ; Food Contamination - legislation & jurisprudence ; Food Contamination - prevention & control ; Food safety ; Food toxicology ; Foodborne Diseases - epidemiology ; Foodborne Diseases - prevention & control ; Foods ; health hazards ; Humans ; Legislation, Food ; Market control ; Markets ; Medical sciences ; RASFF ; Reporting ; Safety ; Security ; Statistics ; Toxicology ; Trend analysis</subject><ispartof>Food and chemical toxicology, 2010-07, Vol.48 (7), p.1957-1964</ispartof><rights>2010 Elsevier Ltd</rights><rights>2015 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>2010 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c438t-c51314bc696511c9d804b062ac792fe2610bfd41169aa346c289010ba5f5b4aa3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c438t-c51314bc696511c9d804b062ac792fe2610bfd41169aa346c289010ba5f5b4aa3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.fct.2010.04.043$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3550,27924,27925,45995</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=22983594$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20435077$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Petróczi, A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Taylor, G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nepusz, T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Naughton, D.P.</creatorcontrib><title>Gate keepers of EU food safety: Four states lead on notification patterns and effectiveness</title><title>Food and chemical toxicology</title><addtitle>Food Chem Toxicol</addtitle><description>The EU RASFF database has been used to provide information on trends in food notifications. The major focus of previous reports has been on either the health hazards arising from various contaminants found in foodstuff or producers of these faulty products. To complement these analyses, the aim of this paper is to examine the food notifications, recorded via the RASFF between 2000 and 2009, from the detectors’ point of view and to compare and contrast detecting activities of those playing a key role in guarding food safety and security in the EU. Data were scrutinized using network analysis to capture underlying pattern in the EU context and detailed descriptive statistics to generate an in-depth view. The results revealed that 60% of the notifications were made by Italy, Germany, the UK and Spain, with the remaining 40% shared among 26 other countries and Commission Services. A distinct reporting pattern was observed between these key countries with the Netherlands showing vigilance above and beyond that expected based on its population, suggesting that countries with major ports might secure food safety in their own country as well as guarding the EU’s food market. The ethnic composition may also influence the detection patterns.</description><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Border control</subject><subject>Complement</subject><subject>Data Collection</subject><subject>Databases, Factual</subject><subject>Detector</subject><subject>Detectors</subject><subject>Disease Notification - standards</subject><subject>European Union</subject><subject>Food Contamination - legislation & jurisprudence</subject><subject>Food Contamination - prevention & control</subject><subject>Food safety</subject><subject>Food toxicology</subject><subject>Foodborne Diseases - epidemiology</subject><subject>Foodborne Diseases - prevention & control</subject><subject>Foods</subject><subject>health hazards</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Legislation, Food</subject><subject>Market control</subject><subject>Markets</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>RASFF</subject><subject>Reporting</subject><subject>Safety</subject><subject>Security</subject><subject>Statistics</subject><subject>Toxicology</subject><subject>Trend analysis</subject><issn>0278-6915</issn><issn>1873-6351</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2010</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkcFuEzEQhi1ERdPCA3ABXxCnTe2112vTE6raglSph5ITB8vrHSOHzTrYTqW-PRMlhRtIM7Jm9P3j8W9C3nK25Iyri_Uy-LpsGdZMYogXZMF1LxolOv6SLFjb60YZ3p2Ss1LWjLGe9-oVOW2R7VjfL8j3W1eB_gTYQi40BXq9oiGlkRYXoD59ojdpl2mpSBU6gRtpmumcagzRuxqx2LpaIc-FunmkEAL4Gh9hhlJek5PgpgJvjuc5Wd1cf7v60tzd3369-nzXeCl0bXzHBZeDV0Z1nHszaiYHplrne9MGaBVnQxgl58o4J6TyrTb45MF1oRskts7Jx8PcbU6_dlCq3cTiYZrcDGlXbK8YNz3K_09KbYTWQiPJD6TPqZQMwW5z3Lj8ZDmze_Pt2qL5dm--ZRJDoObdcfpu2MD4R_HsNgIfjoAr3k0hu9nH8pdrjRadkci9P3DBJet-ZGRWD3hTxzCFbPfrXR4IQF8fI2RbfITZwxgzfoAdU_zHor8B5v-pvQ</recordid><startdate>20100701</startdate><enddate>20100701</enddate><creator>Petróczi, A.</creator><creator>Taylor, G.</creator><creator>Nepusz, T.</creator><creator>Naughton, D.P.</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Elsevier</general><scope>FBQ</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>F28</scope><scope>FR3</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20100701</creationdate><title>Gate keepers of EU food safety: Four states lead on notification patterns and effectiveness</title><author>Petróczi, A. ; Taylor, G. ; Nepusz, T. ; Naughton, D.P.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c438t-c51314bc696511c9d804b062ac792fe2610bfd41169aa346c289010ba5f5b4aa3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2010</creationdate><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Border control</topic><topic>Complement</topic><topic>Data Collection</topic><topic>Databases, Factual</topic><topic>Detector</topic><topic>Detectors</topic><topic>Disease Notification - standards</topic><topic>European Union</topic><topic>Food Contamination - legislation & jurisprudence</topic><topic>Food Contamination - prevention & control</topic><topic>Food safety</topic><topic>Food toxicology</topic><topic>Foodborne Diseases - epidemiology</topic><topic>Foodborne Diseases - prevention & control</topic><topic>Foods</topic><topic>health hazards</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Legislation, Food</topic><topic>Market control</topic><topic>Markets</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>RASFF</topic><topic>Reporting</topic><topic>Safety</topic><topic>Security</topic><topic>Statistics</topic><topic>Toxicology</topic><topic>Trend analysis</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Petróczi, A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Taylor, G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nepusz, T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Naughton, D.P.</creatorcontrib><collection>AGRIS</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ANTE: Abstracts in New Technology & Engineering</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><jtitle>Food and chemical toxicology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Petróczi, A.</au><au>Taylor, G.</au><au>Nepusz, T.</au><au>Naughton, D.P.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Gate keepers of EU food safety: Four states lead on notification patterns and effectiveness</atitle><jtitle>Food and chemical toxicology</jtitle><addtitle>Food Chem Toxicol</addtitle><date>2010-07-01</date><risdate>2010</risdate><volume>48</volume><issue>7</issue><spage>1957</spage><epage>1964</epage><pages>1957-1964</pages><issn>0278-6915</issn><eissn>1873-6351</eissn><coden>FCTOD7</coden><abstract>The EU RASFF database has been used to provide information on trends in food notifications. The major focus of previous reports has been on either the health hazards arising from various contaminants found in foodstuff or producers of these faulty products. To complement these analyses, the aim of this paper is to examine the food notifications, recorded via the RASFF between 2000 and 2009, from the detectors’ point of view and to compare and contrast detecting activities of those playing a key role in guarding food safety and security in the EU. Data were scrutinized using network analysis to capture underlying pattern in the EU context and detailed descriptive statistics to generate an in-depth view. The results revealed that 60% of the notifications were made by Italy, Germany, the UK and Spain, with the remaining 40% shared among 26 other countries and Commission Services. A distinct reporting pattern was observed between these key countries with the Netherlands showing vigilance above and beyond that expected based on its population, suggesting that countries with major ports might secure food safety in their own country as well as guarding the EU’s food market. The ethnic composition may also influence the detection patterns.</abstract><cop>Oxford</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>20435077</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.fct.2010.04.043</doi><tpages>8</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0278-6915 |
ispartof | Food and chemical toxicology, 2010-07, Vol.48 (7), p.1957-1964 |
issn | 0278-6915 1873-6351 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_760197169 |
source | MEDLINE; Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier) |
subjects | Biological and medical sciences Border control Complement Data Collection Databases, Factual Detector Detectors Disease Notification - standards European Union Food Contamination - legislation & jurisprudence Food Contamination - prevention & control Food safety Food toxicology Foodborne Diseases - epidemiology Foodborne Diseases - prevention & control Foods health hazards Humans Legislation, Food Market control Markets Medical sciences RASFF Reporting Safety Security Statistics Toxicology Trend analysis |
title | Gate keepers of EU food safety: Four states lead on notification patterns and effectiveness |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-20T00%3A47%3A14IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Gate%20keepers%20of%20EU%20food%20safety:%20Four%20states%20lead%20on%20notification%20patterns%20and%20effectiveness&rft.jtitle=Food%20and%20chemical%20toxicology&rft.au=Petr%C3%B3czi,%20A.&rft.date=2010-07-01&rft.volume=48&rft.issue=7&rft.spage=1957&rft.epage=1964&rft.pages=1957-1964&rft.issn=0278-6915&rft.eissn=1873-6351&rft.coden=FCTOD7&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.fct.2010.04.043&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E748938838%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=748938838&rft_id=info:pmid/20435077&rft_els_id=S0278691510002577&rfr_iscdi=true |