Identification of mothers at risk for congenital heart block and other neonatal lupus syndromes in their children. comparison of enzyme‐linked immunosorbent assay and immunoblot for measurement of anti–ss‐a/ro and anti–ss‐b/la antibodies

Objective. To identify the fine specificity patterns of maternal anti–SS‐A/Ro and anti–SS‐B/La antibodies that are associated with the birth of a child with transient or permanent manifestations of neonatal lupus syndromes, and to suggest a predictor algorithm for use in counseling. Methods. Sera we...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Arthritis and rheumatism 1993-09, Vol.36 (9), p.1263-1273
Hauptverfasser: Buyon, Jill P., Winchester, Robert J., Slade, Seth G., Arnett, Frank, Copel, Joshua, Friedman, Deborah, Lockshin, Michael D.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1273
container_issue 9
container_start_page 1263
container_title Arthritis and rheumatism
container_volume 36
creator Buyon, Jill P.
Winchester, Robert J.
Slade, Seth G.
Arnett, Frank
Copel, Joshua
Friedman, Deborah
Lockshin, Michael D.
description Objective. To identify the fine specificity patterns of maternal anti–SS‐A/Ro and anti–SS‐B/La antibodies that are associated with the birth of a child with transient or permanent manifestations of neonatal lupus syndromes, and to suggest a predictor algorithm for use in counseling. Methods. Sera were obtained from 4 groups of mothers: 57 whose children had congenital heart block, 12 whose children had transient dermatologic or hepatic manifestations of neonatal lupus but no detectable cardiac involvement, 152 with systemic lupus erythematosus and related autoimmune diseases, who gave birth to healthy infants, and 30 with autoimmune diseases whose pregnancy resulted in miscarriage, fetal death, or early postpartum death unrelated to neonatal lupus. Antibodies to SS‐A/Ro and SS‐B/La were assessed by enzymelinked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) and by sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS)‐immunoblot. Results. Anti–SS‐A/Ro antibodies were identified by ELISA in 100%, 91%, 47%, and 43% of the mothers of infants with heart block, with transient neonatal lupus, healthy infants, and fetal death, respectively. High titers of anti–SS‐A/Ro antibodies were present more often in mothers of children with cardiac disease or transient neonatal lupus than in either of the other 2 groups. Maternal antibodies to SS‐B/La were detected by ELISA in 76% of the heart block group, 73% of the cutaneous neonatal lupus group, 15% of the group with healthy children, and 7% of the fetal death group. On SDS‐immunoblot, sera from 91% of the heart block group mothers who had antibodies to SS‐A/Ro but not to SS‐B/La recognized at least 1 SS‐A/Ro antigen, with significantly greater reactivity against the 52‐kd component. In contrast, only 62% of the anti–SS‐A/Ro positive, anti–SS‐B/La negative responders in the healthy group recognized the 52‐kd and/or the 60‐kd component. Although there was no profile of anti–SS‐A/Ro response unique to the mothers of children with heart block or cutaneous manifestations of neonatal lupus, only 1% of the healthy infants were born to mothers with antibodies directed to both the 52‐kd SS‐A/Ro and 48‐kd SS‐B/La antigens and not to the 60‐kd SS‐A/Ro antigen. Conclusion. Women with antibodies to both SS‐A/Ro and SS‐B/La have an increased risk of giving birth to children with neonatal lupus, especially if the anti‐SS‐A/ Ro response identifies the 52‐kd component on SDS‐immunoblot. Women whose sera contain only anti‐SS‐A/Ro antibodies in low titer and only recognize determina
doi_str_mv 10.1002/art.1780360911
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_76018268</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>76018268</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4091-fcca0e9f7fec3992412cc68a3606eec26937602f9c724baff2c0fa8425686b8c3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkU1v1DAQhiMEKkvhyg3JB8Rtd20nm8THquKjUiUkVM7RxBmzZv2xeBJVy6k_AYl_2D_BFe-HSm-cosw8877jd4riteALwblcQhoXoml5WXMlxJNiJlZSzbkoxdNixjmv5uVKiefFC6Lv-VeWq_KsOGulqCvJZ8WfqwHDaI3VMNoYWDTMx3GNiRiMLFnaMBMT0zF8w2BHcGyN2ZL1LuoNgzCwA80CxgD7tpu2EzHahSFFj8RsYBmwWWJt3ZAwLLKY30KWPtph-LnzeH_3y9mwwYFZ76cQKaY-L8aACHYHn2M9-46HjTwCTQn9HsoqkB9xf_ebKAvBMsXDyONiv3RwKPRxsEgvi2cGHOGr0_e8-Prh_c3lp_n1549XlxfXc13lPOdGa-CoTGNQl0rJSkit6xZy2jWilrUqm5pLo3Qjqx6MkZobaCu5qtu6b3V5Xrw76m5T_DEhjZ23pNE5yIlN1OVp0cq6zeDiCOoUiRKabpush7TrBO_2l-5y7N2_S-eBNyflqfc4POCn0-b-21MfSIMzCYK29IBVijdNozKmjtitdbj7j2l38eXm0Qp_AXY4zmQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>76018268</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Identification of mothers at risk for congenital heart block and other neonatal lupus syndromes in their children. comparison of enzyme‐linked immunosorbent assay and immunoblot for measurement of anti–ss‐a/ro and anti–ss‐b/la antibodies</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Buyon, Jill P. ; Winchester, Robert J. ; Slade, Seth G. ; Arnett, Frank ; Copel, Joshua ; Friedman, Deborah ; Lockshin, Michael D.</creator><creatorcontrib>Buyon, Jill P. ; Winchester, Robert J. ; Slade, Seth G. ; Arnett, Frank ; Copel, Joshua ; Friedman, Deborah ; Lockshin, Michael D.</creatorcontrib><description>Objective. To identify the fine specificity patterns of maternal anti–SS‐A/Ro and anti–SS‐B/La antibodies that are associated with the birth of a child with transient or permanent manifestations of neonatal lupus syndromes, and to suggest a predictor algorithm for use in counseling. Methods. Sera were obtained from 4 groups of mothers: 57 whose children had congenital heart block, 12 whose children had transient dermatologic or hepatic manifestations of neonatal lupus but no detectable cardiac involvement, 152 with systemic lupus erythematosus and related autoimmune diseases, who gave birth to healthy infants, and 30 with autoimmune diseases whose pregnancy resulted in miscarriage, fetal death, or early postpartum death unrelated to neonatal lupus. Antibodies to SS‐A/Ro and SS‐B/La were assessed by enzymelinked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) and by sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS)‐immunoblot. Results. Anti–SS‐A/Ro antibodies were identified by ELISA in 100%, 91%, 47%, and 43% of the mothers of infants with heart block, with transient neonatal lupus, healthy infants, and fetal death, respectively. High titers of anti–SS‐A/Ro antibodies were present more often in mothers of children with cardiac disease or transient neonatal lupus than in either of the other 2 groups. Maternal antibodies to SS‐B/La were detected by ELISA in 76% of the heart block group, 73% of the cutaneous neonatal lupus group, 15% of the group with healthy children, and 7% of the fetal death group. On SDS‐immunoblot, sera from 91% of the heart block group mothers who had antibodies to SS‐A/Ro but not to SS‐B/La recognized at least 1 SS‐A/Ro antigen, with significantly greater reactivity against the 52‐kd component. In contrast, only 62% of the anti–SS‐A/Ro positive, anti–SS‐B/La negative responders in the healthy group recognized the 52‐kd and/or the 60‐kd component. Although there was no profile of anti–SS‐A/Ro response unique to the mothers of children with heart block or cutaneous manifestations of neonatal lupus, only 1% of the healthy infants were born to mothers with antibodies directed to both the 52‐kd SS‐A/Ro and 48‐kd SS‐B/La antigens and not to the 60‐kd SS‐A/Ro antigen. Conclusion. Women with antibodies to both SS‐A/Ro and SS‐B/La have an increased risk of giving birth to children with neonatal lupus, especially if the anti‐SS‐A/ Ro response identifies the 52‐kd component on SDS‐immunoblot. Women whose sera contain only anti‐SS‐A/Ro antibodies in low titer and only recognize determinants that are altered by conditions of SDS‐immunoblot have a low risk for giving birth to a child with neonatal lupus. Specific antibody profiles do not distinguish among the manifestations of the neonatal lupus syndromes.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0004-3591</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1529-0131</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/art.1780360911</identifier><identifier>PMID: 8216420</identifier><identifier>CODEN: ARHEAW</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York: John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc</publisher><subject>Animals ; Antibodies, Antinuclear - analysis ; Antibody Specificity ; Biological and medical sciences ; Cattle ; Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay ; Female ; Gynecology. Andrology. Obstetrics ; Heart Block - congenital ; Humans ; Immunoblotting ; Infant, Newborn ; Infant, Newborn, Diseases - etiology ; Infant, Newborn, Diseases - immunology ; Lupus Vulgaris - etiology ; Lupus Vulgaris - immunology ; Management. Prenatal diagnosis ; Medical sciences ; Mothers ; Pregnancy ; Pregnancy. Fetus. Placenta ; Risk Factors</subject><ispartof>Arthritis and rheumatism, 1993-09, Vol.36 (9), p.1263-1273</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 1993 American College of Rheumatology</rights><rights>1993 INIST-CNRS</rights><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4091-fcca0e9f7fec3992412cc68a3606eec26937602f9c724baff2c0fa8425686b8c3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4091-fcca0e9f7fec3992412cc68a3606eec26937602f9c724baff2c0fa8425686b8c3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2Fart.1780360911$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2Fart.1780360911$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,27901,27902,45550,45551</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=4907779$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8216420$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Buyon, Jill P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Winchester, Robert J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Slade, Seth G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Arnett, Frank</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Copel, Joshua</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Friedman, Deborah</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lockshin, Michael D.</creatorcontrib><title>Identification of mothers at risk for congenital heart block and other neonatal lupus syndromes in their children. comparison of enzyme‐linked immunosorbent assay and immunoblot for measurement of anti–ss‐a/ro and anti–ss‐b/la antibodies</title><title>Arthritis and rheumatism</title><addtitle>Arthritis Rheum</addtitle><description>Objective. To identify the fine specificity patterns of maternal anti–SS‐A/Ro and anti–SS‐B/La antibodies that are associated with the birth of a child with transient or permanent manifestations of neonatal lupus syndromes, and to suggest a predictor algorithm for use in counseling. Methods. Sera were obtained from 4 groups of mothers: 57 whose children had congenital heart block, 12 whose children had transient dermatologic or hepatic manifestations of neonatal lupus but no detectable cardiac involvement, 152 with systemic lupus erythematosus and related autoimmune diseases, who gave birth to healthy infants, and 30 with autoimmune diseases whose pregnancy resulted in miscarriage, fetal death, or early postpartum death unrelated to neonatal lupus. Antibodies to SS‐A/Ro and SS‐B/La were assessed by enzymelinked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) and by sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS)‐immunoblot. Results. Anti–SS‐A/Ro antibodies were identified by ELISA in 100%, 91%, 47%, and 43% of the mothers of infants with heart block, with transient neonatal lupus, healthy infants, and fetal death, respectively. High titers of anti–SS‐A/Ro antibodies were present more often in mothers of children with cardiac disease or transient neonatal lupus than in either of the other 2 groups. Maternal antibodies to SS‐B/La were detected by ELISA in 76% of the heart block group, 73% of the cutaneous neonatal lupus group, 15% of the group with healthy children, and 7% of the fetal death group. On SDS‐immunoblot, sera from 91% of the heart block group mothers who had antibodies to SS‐A/Ro but not to SS‐B/La recognized at least 1 SS‐A/Ro antigen, with significantly greater reactivity against the 52‐kd component. In contrast, only 62% of the anti–SS‐A/Ro positive, anti–SS‐B/La negative responders in the healthy group recognized the 52‐kd and/or the 60‐kd component. Although there was no profile of anti–SS‐A/Ro response unique to the mothers of children with heart block or cutaneous manifestations of neonatal lupus, only 1% of the healthy infants were born to mothers with antibodies directed to both the 52‐kd SS‐A/Ro and 48‐kd SS‐B/La antigens and not to the 60‐kd SS‐A/Ro antigen. Conclusion. Women with antibodies to both SS‐A/Ro and SS‐B/La have an increased risk of giving birth to children with neonatal lupus, especially if the anti‐SS‐A/ Ro response identifies the 52‐kd component on SDS‐immunoblot. Women whose sera contain only anti‐SS‐A/Ro antibodies in low titer and only recognize determinants that are altered by conditions of SDS‐immunoblot have a low risk for giving birth to a child with neonatal lupus. Specific antibody profiles do not distinguish among the manifestations of the neonatal lupus syndromes.</description><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Antibodies, Antinuclear - analysis</subject><subject>Antibody Specificity</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Cattle</subject><subject>Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Gynecology. Andrology. Obstetrics</subject><subject>Heart Block - congenital</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Immunoblotting</subject><subject>Infant, Newborn</subject><subject>Infant, Newborn, Diseases - etiology</subject><subject>Infant, Newborn, Diseases - immunology</subject><subject>Lupus Vulgaris - etiology</subject><subject>Lupus Vulgaris - immunology</subject><subject>Management. Prenatal diagnosis</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Mothers</subject><subject>Pregnancy</subject><subject>Pregnancy. Fetus. Placenta</subject><subject>Risk Factors</subject><issn>0004-3591</issn><issn>1529-0131</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1993</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkU1v1DAQhiMEKkvhyg3JB8Rtd20nm8THquKjUiUkVM7RxBmzZv2xeBJVy6k_AYl_2D_BFe-HSm-cosw8877jd4riteALwblcQhoXoml5WXMlxJNiJlZSzbkoxdNixjmv5uVKiefFC6Lv-VeWq_KsOGulqCvJZ8WfqwHDaI3VMNoYWDTMx3GNiRiMLFnaMBMT0zF8w2BHcGyN2ZL1LuoNgzCwA80CxgD7tpu2EzHahSFFj8RsYBmwWWJt3ZAwLLKY30KWPtph-LnzeH_3y9mwwYFZ76cQKaY-L8aACHYHn2M9-46HjTwCTQn9HsoqkB9xf_ebKAvBMsXDyONiv3RwKPRxsEgvi2cGHOGr0_e8-Prh_c3lp_n1549XlxfXc13lPOdGa-CoTGNQl0rJSkit6xZy2jWilrUqm5pLo3Qjqx6MkZobaCu5qtu6b3V5Xrw76m5T_DEhjZ23pNE5yIlN1OVp0cq6zeDiCOoUiRKabpush7TrBO_2l-5y7N2_S-eBNyflqfc4POCn0-b-21MfSIMzCYK29IBVijdNozKmjtitdbj7j2l38eXm0Qp_AXY4zmQ</recordid><startdate>199309</startdate><enddate>199309</enddate><creator>Buyon, Jill P.</creator><creator>Winchester, Robert J.</creator><creator>Slade, Seth G.</creator><creator>Arnett, Frank</creator><creator>Copel, Joshua</creator><creator>Friedman, Deborah</creator><creator>Lockshin, Michael D.</creator><general>John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc</general><general>Wiley</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>199309</creationdate><title>Identification of mothers at risk for congenital heart block and other neonatal lupus syndromes in their children. comparison of enzyme‐linked immunosorbent assay and immunoblot for measurement of anti–ss‐a/ro and anti–ss‐b/la antibodies</title><author>Buyon, Jill P. ; Winchester, Robert J. ; Slade, Seth G. ; Arnett, Frank ; Copel, Joshua ; Friedman, Deborah ; Lockshin, Michael D.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4091-fcca0e9f7fec3992412cc68a3606eec26937602f9c724baff2c0fa8425686b8c3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1993</creationdate><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Antibodies, Antinuclear - analysis</topic><topic>Antibody Specificity</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Cattle</topic><topic>Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Gynecology. Andrology. Obstetrics</topic><topic>Heart Block - congenital</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Immunoblotting</topic><topic>Infant, Newborn</topic><topic>Infant, Newborn, Diseases - etiology</topic><topic>Infant, Newborn, Diseases - immunology</topic><topic>Lupus Vulgaris - etiology</topic><topic>Lupus Vulgaris - immunology</topic><topic>Management. Prenatal diagnosis</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Mothers</topic><topic>Pregnancy</topic><topic>Pregnancy. Fetus. Placenta</topic><topic>Risk Factors</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Buyon, Jill P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Winchester, Robert J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Slade, Seth G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Arnett, Frank</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Copel, Joshua</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Friedman, Deborah</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lockshin, Michael D.</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Arthritis and rheumatism</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Buyon, Jill P.</au><au>Winchester, Robert J.</au><au>Slade, Seth G.</au><au>Arnett, Frank</au><au>Copel, Joshua</au><au>Friedman, Deborah</au><au>Lockshin, Michael D.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Identification of mothers at risk for congenital heart block and other neonatal lupus syndromes in their children. comparison of enzyme‐linked immunosorbent assay and immunoblot for measurement of anti–ss‐a/ro and anti–ss‐b/la antibodies</atitle><jtitle>Arthritis and rheumatism</jtitle><addtitle>Arthritis Rheum</addtitle><date>1993-09</date><risdate>1993</risdate><volume>36</volume><issue>9</issue><spage>1263</spage><epage>1273</epage><pages>1263-1273</pages><issn>0004-3591</issn><eissn>1529-0131</eissn><coden>ARHEAW</coden><abstract>Objective. To identify the fine specificity patterns of maternal anti–SS‐A/Ro and anti–SS‐B/La antibodies that are associated with the birth of a child with transient or permanent manifestations of neonatal lupus syndromes, and to suggest a predictor algorithm for use in counseling. Methods. Sera were obtained from 4 groups of mothers: 57 whose children had congenital heart block, 12 whose children had transient dermatologic or hepatic manifestations of neonatal lupus but no detectable cardiac involvement, 152 with systemic lupus erythematosus and related autoimmune diseases, who gave birth to healthy infants, and 30 with autoimmune diseases whose pregnancy resulted in miscarriage, fetal death, or early postpartum death unrelated to neonatal lupus. Antibodies to SS‐A/Ro and SS‐B/La were assessed by enzymelinked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) and by sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS)‐immunoblot. Results. Anti–SS‐A/Ro antibodies were identified by ELISA in 100%, 91%, 47%, and 43% of the mothers of infants with heart block, with transient neonatal lupus, healthy infants, and fetal death, respectively. High titers of anti–SS‐A/Ro antibodies were present more often in mothers of children with cardiac disease or transient neonatal lupus than in either of the other 2 groups. Maternal antibodies to SS‐B/La were detected by ELISA in 76% of the heart block group, 73% of the cutaneous neonatal lupus group, 15% of the group with healthy children, and 7% of the fetal death group. On SDS‐immunoblot, sera from 91% of the heart block group mothers who had antibodies to SS‐A/Ro but not to SS‐B/La recognized at least 1 SS‐A/Ro antigen, with significantly greater reactivity against the 52‐kd component. In contrast, only 62% of the anti–SS‐A/Ro positive, anti–SS‐B/La negative responders in the healthy group recognized the 52‐kd and/or the 60‐kd component. Although there was no profile of anti–SS‐A/Ro response unique to the mothers of children with heart block or cutaneous manifestations of neonatal lupus, only 1% of the healthy infants were born to mothers with antibodies directed to both the 52‐kd SS‐A/Ro and 48‐kd SS‐B/La antigens and not to the 60‐kd SS‐A/Ro antigen. Conclusion. Women with antibodies to both SS‐A/Ro and SS‐B/La have an increased risk of giving birth to children with neonatal lupus, especially if the anti‐SS‐A/ Ro response identifies the 52‐kd component on SDS‐immunoblot. Women whose sera contain only anti‐SS‐A/Ro antibodies in low titer and only recognize determinants that are altered by conditions of SDS‐immunoblot have a low risk for giving birth to a child with neonatal lupus. Specific antibody profiles do not distinguish among the manifestations of the neonatal lupus syndromes.</abstract><cop>New York</cop><pub>John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc</pub><pmid>8216420</pmid><doi>10.1002/art.1780360911</doi><tpages>11</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0004-3591
ispartof Arthritis and rheumatism, 1993-09, Vol.36 (9), p.1263-1273
issn 0004-3591
1529-0131
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_76018268
source MEDLINE; Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete; Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects Animals
Antibodies, Antinuclear - analysis
Antibody Specificity
Biological and medical sciences
Cattle
Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay
Female
Gynecology. Andrology. Obstetrics
Heart Block - congenital
Humans
Immunoblotting
Infant, Newborn
Infant, Newborn, Diseases - etiology
Infant, Newborn, Diseases - immunology
Lupus Vulgaris - etiology
Lupus Vulgaris - immunology
Management. Prenatal diagnosis
Medical sciences
Mothers
Pregnancy
Pregnancy. Fetus. Placenta
Risk Factors
title Identification of mothers at risk for congenital heart block and other neonatal lupus syndromes in their children. comparison of enzyme‐linked immunosorbent assay and immunoblot for measurement of anti–ss‐a/ro and anti–ss‐b/la antibodies
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-30T06%3A23%3A08IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Identification%20of%20mothers%20at%20risk%20for%20congenital%20heart%20block%20and%20other%20neonatal%20lupus%20syndromes%20in%20their%20children.%20comparison%20of%20enzyme%E2%80%90linked%20immunosorbent%20assay%20and%20immunoblot%20for%20measurement%20of%20anti%E2%80%93ss%E2%80%90a/ro%20and%20anti%E2%80%93ss%E2%80%90b/la%20antibodies&rft.jtitle=Arthritis%20and%20rheumatism&rft.au=Buyon,%20Jill%20P.&rft.date=1993-09&rft.volume=36&rft.issue=9&rft.spage=1263&rft.epage=1273&rft.pages=1263-1273&rft.issn=0004-3591&rft.eissn=1529-0131&rft.coden=ARHEAW&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/art.1780360911&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E76018268%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=76018268&rft_id=info:pmid/8216420&rfr_iscdi=true