Aortic Root Enlargement with Glycerol-preserved Homologous Dura Mater Patch during Aortic Valve Replacement
Summary Aortic root enlargement with a patch is sometimes indicated either to prevent aortic homograft valve distortion during implantation or to facilitate easy, tension-free closure of the aortotomy. Patches made of prosthetic material have been widely used for this purpose. The use of autogenous...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | The Thoracic and cardiovascular surgeon 1985-02, Vol.6 (1), p.23-25 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 25 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 23 |
container_title | The Thoracic and cardiovascular surgeon |
container_volume | 6 |
creator | Osinowo, O. Ross, J. K. Monro, J. L. |
description | Summary
Aortic root enlargement with a patch is sometimes indicated either to prevent aortic homograft valve distortion during implantation or to facilitate easy, tension-free closure of the aortotomy. Patches made of prosthetic material have been widely used for this purpose. The use of autogenous pericardium has recently been reported. Although dura mater has been shown to have great strength, low antigenicity, athrombogenicity, easy availability in large sizes and rapid bonding to most tissues, its use for patch enlargement of the aortic root has not been previously documented. From 1979 to 1983, 38 patients had dura mater aortic root gussets placed during aortic valve replacement at the Southampton General Hospital. In all cases, the patches were placed to facilitate aortic closure, or to prevent homograft valve distortion by enlarging the non-coronary sinus. Aortic homografts were implanted in 11 patients, Carpentier Edwards' Xenograft valves in 16, Björk-Shiley valves in 8 and Wessex Xenografts in 3 patients.
All the patients survived and in a mean follow-up of 30 ± 12.8 months (range 3 to 48 months) there has been no clinical evidence of patch failure due to leakage, rupture or aneurysm formation. These results suggest that glycerol-preserved dura mater is a satisfactory patch material for aortic root enlargement during aortic valve replacement. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1055/s-2007-1014075 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_76010346</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>76010346</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c328t-b1d5170171ad39dc90dbb8b503024a886398a6170758c1910d0dca8d427dc22a3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kD1v2zAQhokiReKkXbsF4JSNyZESRWo0HOcDSNHCaLsSFMnYSilRJakU_veVayFbphve5x7cvQh9oXBNgfObRBiAIBRoCYJ_QAtaFjWhNbATtAAqKKlKxs_QeUovMEFS1qfolHFRl1ws0O9liLk1eBNCxuve67h1nesz_tvmHb73e-Ni8GSILrn46ix-CF3wYRvGhG_HqPFXnV3E33U2O2zH2PZbPCt_af_q8MYNXpv_zk_o47P2yX2e5wX6ebf-sXogT9_uH1fLJ2IKJjNpqOVUHE7XtqitqcE2jWw4FMBKLWVV1FJXEyG4NLSmYMEaLW3JhDWM6eICXR29Qwx_Rpey6tpknPe6d9PdSlRAoSirCbw-giaGlKJ7VkNsOx33ioI6tKuSOrSr5nanhcvZPDads2_4XOeUk2Oed-30snoJY-ynV9_z_QN8_YNS</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>76010346</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Aortic Root Enlargement with Glycerol-preserved Homologous Dura Mater Patch during Aortic Valve Replacement</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Thieme Connect Journals</source><creator>Osinowo, O. ; Ross, J. K. ; Monro, J. L.</creator><creatorcontrib>Osinowo, O. ; Ross, J. K. ; Monro, J. L.</creatorcontrib><description>Summary
Aortic root enlargement with a patch is sometimes indicated either to prevent aortic homograft valve distortion during implantation or to facilitate easy, tension-free closure of the aortotomy. Patches made of prosthetic material have been widely used for this purpose. The use of autogenous pericardium has recently been reported. Although dura mater has been shown to have great strength, low antigenicity, athrombogenicity, easy availability in large sizes and rapid bonding to most tissues, its use for patch enlargement of the aortic root has not been previously documented. From 1979 to 1983, 38 patients had dura mater aortic root gussets placed during aortic valve replacement at the Southampton General Hospital. In all cases, the patches were placed to facilitate aortic closure, or to prevent homograft valve distortion by enlarging the non-coronary sinus. Aortic homografts were implanted in 11 patients, Carpentier Edwards' Xenograft valves in 16, Björk-Shiley valves in 8 and Wessex Xenografts in 3 patients.
All the patients survived and in a mean follow-up of 30 ± 12.8 months (range 3 to 48 months) there has been no clinical evidence of patch failure due to leakage, rupture or aneurysm formation. These results suggest that glycerol-preserved dura mater is a satisfactory patch material for aortic root enlargement during aortic valve replacement.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0171-6425</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1439-1902</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1055/s-2007-1014075</identifier><identifier>PMID: 2579457</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Germany</publisher><subject>Adolescent ; Adult ; Aged ; Aorta, Thoracic - surgery ; Aortic Valve Insufficiency - surgery ; Aortic Valve Stenosis - surgery ; Bioprosthesis ; Blood Vessel Prosthesis ; Female ; Follow-Up Studies ; Heart Valve Prosthesis ; Humans ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Postoperative Complications - etiology ; Prosthesis Design ; Risk</subject><ispartof>The Thoracic and cardiovascular surgeon, 1985-02, Vol.6 (1), p.23-25</ispartof><rights>Georg Thieme Verlag Stuttgart · New York</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c328t-b1d5170171ad39dc90dbb8b503024a886398a6170758c1910d0dca8d427dc22a3</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.thieme-connect.de/products/ejournals/pdf/10.1055/s-2007-1014075.pdf$$EPDF$$P50$$Gthieme$$H</linktopdf><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3017,3018,27924,27925,54559</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/2579457$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Osinowo, O.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ross, J. K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Monro, J. L.</creatorcontrib><title>Aortic Root Enlargement with Glycerol-preserved Homologous Dura Mater Patch during Aortic Valve Replacement</title><title>The Thoracic and cardiovascular surgeon</title><addtitle>Thorac cardiovasc Surg</addtitle><description>Summary
Aortic root enlargement with a patch is sometimes indicated either to prevent aortic homograft valve distortion during implantation or to facilitate easy, tension-free closure of the aortotomy. Patches made of prosthetic material have been widely used for this purpose. The use of autogenous pericardium has recently been reported. Although dura mater has been shown to have great strength, low antigenicity, athrombogenicity, easy availability in large sizes and rapid bonding to most tissues, its use for patch enlargement of the aortic root has not been previously documented. From 1979 to 1983, 38 patients had dura mater aortic root gussets placed during aortic valve replacement at the Southampton General Hospital. In all cases, the patches were placed to facilitate aortic closure, or to prevent homograft valve distortion by enlarging the non-coronary sinus. Aortic homografts were implanted in 11 patients, Carpentier Edwards' Xenograft valves in 16, Björk-Shiley valves in 8 and Wessex Xenografts in 3 patients.
All the patients survived and in a mean follow-up of 30 ± 12.8 months (range 3 to 48 months) there has been no clinical evidence of patch failure due to leakage, rupture or aneurysm formation. These results suggest that glycerol-preserved dura mater is a satisfactory patch material for aortic root enlargement during aortic valve replacement.</description><subject>Adolescent</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Aorta, Thoracic - surgery</subject><subject>Aortic Valve Insufficiency - surgery</subject><subject>Aortic Valve Stenosis - surgery</subject><subject>Bioprosthesis</subject><subject>Blood Vessel Prosthesis</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Follow-Up Studies</subject><subject>Heart Valve Prosthesis</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Postoperative Complications - etiology</subject><subject>Prosthesis Design</subject><subject>Risk</subject><issn>0171-6425</issn><issn>1439-1902</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1985</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kD1v2zAQhokiReKkXbsF4JSNyZESRWo0HOcDSNHCaLsSFMnYSilRJakU_veVayFbphve5x7cvQh9oXBNgfObRBiAIBRoCYJ_QAtaFjWhNbATtAAqKKlKxs_QeUovMEFS1qfolHFRl1ws0O9liLk1eBNCxuve67h1nesz_tvmHb73e-Ni8GSILrn46ix-CF3wYRvGhG_HqPFXnV3E33U2O2zH2PZbPCt_af_q8MYNXpv_zk_o47P2yX2e5wX6ebf-sXogT9_uH1fLJ2IKJjNpqOVUHE7XtqitqcE2jWw4FMBKLWVV1FJXEyG4NLSmYMEaLW3JhDWM6eICXR29Qwx_Rpey6tpknPe6d9PdSlRAoSirCbw-giaGlKJ7VkNsOx33ioI6tKuSOrSr5nanhcvZPDads2_4XOeUk2Oed-30snoJY-ynV9_z_QN8_YNS</recordid><startdate>198502</startdate><enddate>198502</enddate><creator>Osinowo, O.</creator><creator>Ross, J. K.</creator><creator>Monro, J. L.</creator><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>198502</creationdate><title>Aortic Root Enlargement with Glycerol-preserved Homologous Dura Mater Patch during Aortic Valve Replacement</title><author>Osinowo, O. ; Ross, J. K. ; Monro, J. L.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c328t-b1d5170171ad39dc90dbb8b503024a886398a6170758c1910d0dca8d427dc22a3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1985</creationdate><topic>Adolescent</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Aorta, Thoracic - surgery</topic><topic>Aortic Valve Insufficiency - surgery</topic><topic>Aortic Valve Stenosis - surgery</topic><topic>Bioprosthesis</topic><topic>Blood Vessel Prosthesis</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Follow-Up Studies</topic><topic>Heart Valve Prosthesis</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Postoperative Complications - etiology</topic><topic>Prosthesis Design</topic><topic>Risk</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Osinowo, O.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ross, J. K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Monro, J. L.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>The Thoracic and cardiovascular surgeon</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Osinowo, O.</au><au>Ross, J. K.</au><au>Monro, J. L.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Aortic Root Enlargement with Glycerol-preserved Homologous Dura Mater Patch during Aortic Valve Replacement</atitle><jtitle>The Thoracic and cardiovascular surgeon</jtitle><addtitle>Thorac cardiovasc Surg</addtitle><date>1985-02</date><risdate>1985</risdate><volume>6</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>23</spage><epage>25</epage><pages>23-25</pages><issn>0171-6425</issn><eissn>1439-1902</eissn><abstract>Summary
Aortic root enlargement with a patch is sometimes indicated either to prevent aortic homograft valve distortion during implantation or to facilitate easy, tension-free closure of the aortotomy. Patches made of prosthetic material have been widely used for this purpose. The use of autogenous pericardium has recently been reported. Although dura mater has been shown to have great strength, low antigenicity, athrombogenicity, easy availability in large sizes and rapid bonding to most tissues, its use for patch enlargement of the aortic root has not been previously documented. From 1979 to 1983, 38 patients had dura mater aortic root gussets placed during aortic valve replacement at the Southampton General Hospital. In all cases, the patches were placed to facilitate aortic closure, or to prevent homograft valve distortion by enlarging the non-coronary sinus. Aortic homografts were implanted in 11 patients, Carpentier Edwards' Xenograft valves in 16, Björk-Shiley valves in 8 and Wessex Xenografts in 3 patients.
All the patients survived and in a mean follow-up of 30 ± 12.8 months (range 3 to 48 months) there has been no clinical evidence of patch failure due to leakage, rupture or aneurysm formation. These results suggest that glycerol-preserved dura mater is a satisfactory patch material for aortic root enlargement during aortic valve replacement.</abstract><cop>Germany</cop><pmid>2579457</pmid><doi>10.1055/s-2007-1014075</doi><tpages>3</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0171-6425 |
ispartof | The Thoracic and cardiovascular surgeon, 1985-02, Vol.6 (1), p.23-25 |
issn | 0171-6425 1439-1902 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_76010346 |
source | MEDLINE; Thieme Connect Journals |
subjects | Adolescent Adult Aged Aorta, Thoracic - surgery Aortic Valve Insufficiency - surgery Aortic Valve Stenosis - surgery Bioprosthesis Blood Vessel Prosthesis Female Follow-Up Studies Heart Valve Prosthesis Humans Male Middle Aged Postoperative Complications - etiology Prosthesis Design Risk |
title | Aortic Root Enlargement with Glycerol-preserved Homologous Dura Mater Patch during Aortic Valve Replacement |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-24T22%3A26%3A15IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Aortic%20Root%20Enlargement%20with%20Glycerol-preserved%20Homologous%20Dura%20Mater%20Patch%20during%20Aortic%20Valve%20Replacement&rft.jtitle=The%20Thoracic%20and%20cardiovascular%20surgeon&rft.au=Osinowo,%20O.&rft.date=1985-02&rft.volume=6&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=23&rft.epage=25&rft.pages=23-25&rft.issn=0171-6425&rft.eissn=1439-1902&rft_id=info:doi/10.1055/s-2007-1014075&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E76010346%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=76010346&rft_id=info:pmid/2579457&rfr_iscdi=true |