Infliximab for Crohnʼs disease in the Swiss IBD Cohort Study: clinical management and appropriateness

OBJECTIVEAntitumor necrosis factor α agents have significantly improved the management of Crohnʼs disease (CD), but not all patients benefit from this therapy. We used data from the Swiss Inflammatory Bowel Disease Cohort Study and predefined appropriateness criteria to examine the appropriateness o...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:European journal of gastroenterology & hepatology 2010-11, Vol.22 (11), p.1352-1357
Hauptverfasser: Juillerat, Pascal, Pittet, Valérie, Vader, John-Paul, Burnand, Bernard, Gonvers, Jean-Jacques, de Saussure, Philippe, Mottet, Christian, Seibold, Frank, Rogler, Gerhard, Sagmeister, Markus, Felley, Christian, Michetti, Pierre, Froehlich, Florian
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:OBJECTIVEAntitumor necrosis factor α agents have significantly improved the management of Crohnʼs disease (CD), but not all patients benefit from this therapy. We used data from the Swiss Inflammatory Bowel Disease Cohort Study and predefined appropriateness criteria to examine the appropriateness of use of infliximab (IFX) in CD patients. METHODSEPACT II (European Panel on the Appropriateness of CD Therapy, 2007; www.epact.ch) appropriateness criteria have been developed using a formal explicit panel process combining evidence from the published literature and expert opinion. Questionnaires relating to EPACT II criteria were used at enrollment and follow-up of all Swiss Inflammatory Bowel Disease Cohort Study patients. A step-by-step analysis of all possible indications for IFX therapy in a given patient allowed identification of the most appropriate indication and final classification in a single appropriateness category (appropriate, uncertain, inappropriate). RESULTSEight hundred and twenty-one CD patients were prospectively enrolled between November 2006 and March 2009. IFX was administered to 146 patients (18%) at enrollment and was most frequently used for complex fistulizing disease and for the maintenance of remission induced by biological therapy. IFX therapy was considered appropriate in 44%, uncertain in 44%, and inappropriate in 10% of patients. CONCLUSIONIn this cohort, 9 out of 10 indications for IFX therapy were clinically generally acceptable (appropriate or uncertain) according to EPACT II criteria. Uncertain indications resulted mainly from the current more liberal use of IFX in clinical practice as compared with the EPACT II criteria.
ISSN:0954-691X
1473-5687
DOI:10.1097/MEG.0b013e32833eaa8a