Easing the Burden on Health Departments: A Cost-Effective Method for Public Health Nurses to Increase Private Sector Participation in the Early and Periodic Screening, Diagnosis, and Treatment Program

Federal legislation requires states to increase use of the early and periodic screening, diagnosis, and treatment (EPSDT) program. The program provides comprehensive health services to children from low‐income families on Medicaid and has been shown to improve health and reduce health care costs. He...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Public health Nursing 1993-06, Vol.10 (2), p.114-121
Hauptverfasser: Selby-Harrington, Maija L., Riportella-Muller, Roberta
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 121
container_issue 2
container_start_page 114
container_title Public health Nursing
container_volume 10
creator Selby-Harrington, Maija L.
Riportella-Muller, Roberta
description Federal legislation requires states to increase use of the early and periodic screening, diagnosis, and treatment (EPSDT) program. The program provides comprehensive health services to children from low‐income families on Medicaid and has been shown to improve health and reduce health care costs. Health departments and public health nurses (PHNs) bear a major burden conducting EPSDT screenings because many private physicians choose not to provide these services. Given scarce resources, health departments alone may be unable to meet the mandate for increased EPSDT services. Thus PHNs concerned about children's access to health care may have to encourage provision of EPSDT through the private sector. This project, phase I of the federally funded Healthy Kids Project to increase EPSDT use in rural areas of North Carolina, established the cost‐effectiveness of a mailed intervention to recruit private physicians to do EPSDT screens that exceeded the capacity of health departments. The intervention, consisting of a personal letter, journal article, and pamphlet, was sent to all 73 primary care physicians in six rural counties. Before the mailing, 15 (21%) of the 73 physicians were willing to provide EPSDT screenings; after the mailing the number rose to 25 (34%). The one‐time cost to recruit each provider was less than the estimated annual cost savings associated with each child in the EPSDT program.
doi_str_mv 10.1111/j.1525-1446.1993.tb00034.x
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_75961874</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>75961874</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4074-f2a99461226840e3010e2f44af903fe260aeac632687747111ee4e7ae19e75f83</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqVklFv0zAUhSMEGmXwE5AsHnhaih07cbIHpK0r66RRIm3Ao-Um161LEne2M9p_yM_CaUvf8YsfzjnfvfJxFH0geEzC-bQekzRJY8JYNiZFQcd-gTGmbLx9EY1O0stohDnlMUlw8Tp649x6MKVJdhad5ZTnCSWj6M9UOt0tkV8Buu5tDR0yHZqBbPwK3cBGWt9C590lukIT43w8VQoqr58BfQW_MjVSxqKyXzS6-heb99aBQ96gu66yIB2g0upn6QE9hOzgD1hd6Y30OkzT3X78VNpmh2RXoxKsNnUAPoQ4dGG_C3Sj5bIzTruLveUxcPebBbRZWtm-jV4p2Th4d7zPo-9fpo-TWXz_7fZucnUfVwxzFqtEFgXLSJJkOcNAMcGQKMakKjBVkGRYgqwyGmTOGQ-vDcCASyAF8FTl9Dz6eOBurHnqwXnRaldB08gOTO8ET4uM5JwF4-XBWFnjnAUlNla30u4EwWKoUazF0JUYuhJDjeJYo9iG8PvjlH7RQn2KHnsL-ueD_ls3sPsPsihnc0KG7eIDQDsP2xNA2l8iC58mFT_nt-I6LX8UaZkISv8CHTi-CQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>75961874</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Easing the Burden on Health Departments: A Cost-Effective Method for Public Health Nurses to Increase Private Sector Participation in the Early and Periodic Screening, Diagnosis, and Treatment Program</title><source>Wiley-Blackwell Journals</source><source>MEDLINE</source><creator>Selby-Harrington, Maija L. ; Riportella-Muller, Roberta</creator><creatorcontrib>Selby-Harrington, Maija L. ; Riportella-Muller, Roberta</creatorcontrib><description>Federal legislation requires states to increase use of the early and periodic screening, diagnosis, and treatment (EPSDT) program. The program provides comprehensive health services to children from low‐income families on Medicaid and has been shown to improve health and reduce health care costs. Health departments and public health nurses (PHNs) bear a major burden conducting EPSDT screenings because many private physicians choose not to provide these services. Given scarce resources, health departments alone may be unable to meet the mandate for increased EPSDT services. Thus PHNs concerned about children's access to health care may have to encourage provision of EPSDT through the private sector. This project, phase I of the federally funded Healthy Kids Project to increase EPSDT use in rural areas of North Carolina, established the cost‐effectiveness of a mailed intervention to recruit private physicians to do EPSDT screens that exceeded the capacity of health departments. The intervention, consisting of a personal letter, journal article, and pamphlet, was sent to all 73 primary care physicians in six rural counties. Before the mailing, 15 (21%) of the 73 physicians were willing to provide EPSDT screenings; after the mailing the number rose to 25 (34%). The one‐time cost to recruit each provider was less than the estimated annual cost savings associated with each child in the EPSDT program.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0737-1209</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1525-1446</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/j.1525-1446.1993.tb00034.x</identifier><identifier>PMID: 8378231</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Child Health Services - economics ; Child Health Services - legislation &amp; jurisprudence ; Child Health Services - manpower ; Child, Preschool ; Cost Savings ; Cost-Benefit Analysis ; Humans ; Mass Screening - economics ; Mass Screening - legislation &amp; jurisprudence ; North Carolina ; Nursing ; Physicians - utilization ; Private Sector ; Public Health Nursing ; Role ; Rural Health</subject><ispartof>Public health Nursing, 1993-06, Vol.10 (2), p.114-121</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4074-f2a99461226840e3010e2f44af903fe260aeac632687747111ee4e7ae19e75f83</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4074-f2a99461226840e3010e2f44af903fe260aeac632687747111ee4e7ae19e75f83</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fj.1525-1446.1993.tb00034.x$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fj.1525-1446.1993.tb00034.x$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1417,27924,27925,45574,45575</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8378231$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Selby-Harrington, Maija L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Riportella-Muller, Roberta</creatorcontrib><title>Easing the Burden on Health Departments: A Cost-Effective Method for Public Health Nurses to Increase Private Sector Participation in the Early and Periodic Screening, Diagnosis, and Treatment Program</title><title>Public health Nursing</title><addtitle>Public Health Nurs</addtitle><description>Federal legislation requires states to increase use of the early and periodic screening, diagnosis, and treatment (EPSDT) program. The program provides comprehensive health services to children from low‐income families on Medicaid and has been shown to improve health and reduce health care costs. Health departments and public health nurses (PHNs) bear a major burden conducting EPSDT screenings because many private physicians choose not to provide these services. Given scarce resources, health departments alone may be unable to meet the mandate for increased EPSDT services. Thus PHNs concerned about children's access to health care may have to encourage provision of EPSDT through the private sector. This project, phase I of the federally funded Healthy Kids Project to increase EPSDT use in rural areas of North Carolina, established the cost‐effectiveness of a mailed intervention to recruit private physicians to do EPSDT screens that exceeded the capacity of health departments. The intervention, consisting of a personal letter, journal article, and pamphlet, was sent to all 73 primary care physicians in six rural counties. Before the mailing, 15 (21%) of the 73 physicians were willing to provide EPSDT screenings; after the mailing the number rose to 25 (34%). The one‐time cost to recruit each provider was less than the estimated annual cost savings associated with each child in the EPSDT program.</description><subject>Child Health Services - economics</subject><subject>Child Health Services - legislation &amp; jurisprudence</subject><subject>Child Health Services - manpower</subject><subject>Child, Preschool</subject><subject>Cost Savings</subject><subject>Cost-Benefit Analysis</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Mass Screening - economics</subject><subject>Mass Screening - legislation &amp; jurisprudence</subject><subject>North Carolina</subject><subject>Nursing</subject><subject>Physicians - utilization</subject><subject>Private Sector</subject><subject>Public Health Nursing</subject><subject>Role</subject><subject>Rural Health</subject><issn>0737-1209</issn><issn>1525-1446</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1993</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqVklFv0zAUhSMEGmXwE5AsHnhaih07cbIHpK0r66RRIm3Ao-Um161LEne2M9p_yM_CaUvf8YsfzjnfvfJxFH0geEzC-bQekzRJY8JYNiZFQcd-gTGmbLx9EY1O0stohDnlMUlw8Tp649x6MKVJdhad5ZTnCSWj6M9UOt0tkV8Buu5tDR0yHZqBbPwK3cBGWt9C590lukIT43w8VQoqr58BfQW_MjVSxqKyXzS6-heb99aBQ96gu66yIB2g0upn6QE9hOzgD1hd6Y30OkzT3X78VNpmh2RXoxKsNnUAPoQ4dGG_C3Sj5bIzTruLveUxcPebBbRZWtm-jV4p2Th4d7zPo-9fpo-TWXz_7fZucnUfVwxzFqtEFgXLSJJkOcNAMcGQKMakKjBVkGRYgqwyGmTOGQ-vDcCASyAF8FTl9Dz6eOBurHnqwXnRaldB08gOTO8ET4uM5JwF4-XBWFnjnAUlNla30u4EwWKoUazF0JUYuhJDjeJYo9iG8PvjlH7RQn2KHnsL-ueD_ls3sPsPsihnc0KG7eIDQDsP2xNA2l8iC58mFT_nt-I6LX8UaZkISv8CHTi-CQ</recordid><startdate>199306</startdate><enddate>199306</enddate><creator>Selby-Harrington, Maija L.</creator><creator>Riportella-Muller, Roberta</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>199306</creationdate><title>Easing the Burden on Health Departments: A Cost-Effective Method for Public Health Nurses to Increase Private Sector Participation in the Early and Periodic Screening, Diagnosis, and Treatment Program</title><author>Selby-Harrington, Maija L. ; Riportella-Muller, Roberta</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4074-f2a99461226840e3010e2f44af903fe260aeac632687747111ee4e7ae19e75f83</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1993</creationdate><topic>Child Health Services - economics</topic><topic>Child Health Services - legislation &amp; jurisprudence</topic><topic>Child Health Services - manpower</topic><topic>Child, Preschool</topic><topic>Cost Savings</topic><topic>Cost-Benefit Analysis</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Mass Screening - economics</topic><topic>Mass Screening - legislation &amp; jurisprudence</topic><topic>North Carolina</topic><topic>Nursing</topic><topic>Physicians - utilization</topic><topic>Private Sector</topic><topic>Public Health Nursing</topic><topic>Role</topic><topic>Rural Health</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Selby-Harrington, Maija L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Riportella-Muller, Roberta</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Public health Nursing</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Selby-Harrington, Maija L.</au><au>Riportella-Muller, Roberta</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Easing the Burden on Health Departments: A Cost-Effective Method for Public Health Nurses to Increase Private Sector Participation in the Early and Periodic Screening, Diagnosis, and Treatment Program</atitle><jtitle>Public health Nursing</jtitle><addtitle>Public Health Nurs</addtitle><date>1993-06</date><risdate>1993</risdate><volume>10</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>114</spage><epage>121</epage><pages>114-121</pages><issn>0737-1209</issn><eissn>1525-1446</eissn><abstract>Federal legislation requires states to increase use of the early and periodic screening, diagnosis, and treatment (EPSDT) program. The program provides comprehensive health services to children from low‐income families on Medicaid and has been shown to improve health and reduce health care costs. Health departments and public health nurses (PHNs) bear a major burden conducting EPSDT screenings because many private physicians choose not to provide these services. Given scarce resources, health departments alone may be unable to meet the mandate for increased EPSDT services. Thus PHNs concerned about children's access to health care may have to encourage provision of EPSDT through the private sector. This project, phase I of the federally funded Healthy Kids Project to increase EPSDT use in rural areas of North Carolina, established the cost‐effectiveness of a mailed intervention to recruit private physicians to do EPSDT screens that exceeded the capacity of health departments. The intervention, consisting of a personal letter, journal article, and pamphlet, was sent to all 73 primary care physicians in six rural counties. Before the mailing, 15 (21%) of the 73 physicians were willing to provide EPSDT screenings; after the mailing the number rose to 25 (34%). The one‐time cost to recruit each provider was less than the estimated annual cost savings associated with each child in the EPSDT program.</abstract><cop>Oxford, UK</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><pmid>8378231</pmid><doi>10.1111/j.1525-1446.1993.tb00034.x</doi><tpages>8</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0737-1209
ispartof Public health Nursing, 1993-06, Vol.10 (2), p.114-121
issn 0737-1209
1525-1446
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_75961874
source Wiley-Blackwell Journals; MEDLINE
subjects Child Health Services - economics
Child Health Services - legislation & jurisprudence
Child Health Services - manpower
Child, Preschool
Cost Savings
Cost-Benefit Analysis
Humans
Mass Screening - economics
Mass Screening - legislation & jurisprudence
North Carolina
Nursing
Physicians - utilization
Private Sector
Public Health Nursing
Role
Rural Health
title Easing the Burden on Health Departments: A Cost-Effective Method for Public Health Nurses to Increase Private Sector Participation in the Early and Periodic Screening, Diagnosis, and Treatment Program
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-03T19%3A45%3A34IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Easing%20the%20Burden%20on%20Health%20Departments:%20A%20Cost-Effective%20Method%20for%20Public%20Health%20Nurses%20to%20Increase%20Private%20Sector%20Participation%20in%20the%20Early%20and%20Periodic%20Screening,%20Diagnosis,%20and%20Treatment%20Program&rft.jtitle=Public%20health%20Nursing&rft.au=Selby-Harrington,%20Maija%20L.&rft.date=1993-06&rft.volume=10&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=114&rft.epage=121&rft.pages=114-121&rft.issn=0737-1209&rft.eissn=1525-1446&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/j.1525-1446.1993.tb00034.x&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E75961874%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=75961874&rft_id=info:pmid/8378231&rfr_iscdi=true