Radiologistsʼ Perception of Professional Journals

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES.We assessed radiologistsʼ perceptions of radiologic and general medical journals. METHODS.Five thousand randomly chosen radiologists (4,200 American College of Radiology (ACR) members and 800 members in training) were surveyed by mail concerning their opinion of selected rad...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Investigative radiology 1993-08, Vol.28 (8), p.706-709
Hauptverfasser: HUNTER, TIM B, MARCUS, DAVID S, WITZKE, DONALD B
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 709
container_issue 8
container_start_page 706
container_title Investigative radiology
container_volume 28
creator HUNTER, TIM B
MARCUS, DAVID S
WITZKE, DONALD B
description RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES.We assessed radiologistsʼ perceptions of radiologic and general medical journals. METHODS.Five thousand randomly chosen radiologists (4,200 American College of Radiology (ACR) members and 800 members in training) were surveyed by mail concerning their opinion of selected radiology and major medical journals. The mail survey was followed up by a phone survey of 45 previously unsurveyed radiologists from a smaller list of a similar ACR population. RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS.Of the 5,000 surveys mailed out, 987 (20%) were completed and returned. There were no systematic differences in the questionnaire results between those surveyed by phone and those surveyed by mail. In general, academic radiologists, private practice radiologists, and radiologists in training did not differ in their assessment of professional journals. The respondents picked Radiology as their first choice if they were allowed to read only one journal.The respondents believed that Radiology published the best clinical research and Investigative Radiology the best basic science research. American Journal of Roentgenology (AJR), Radiology, and Journal of Computer Assisted Tomography ranked highest for sureness and rapidity of manuscript acceptance and publication, while Radiology, New England Journal of Medicine, and the Journal of the American Medical Association ranked highest in terms of exposure and prestige.
doi_str_mv 10.1097/00004424-199308000-00011
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_75960715</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>75960715</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3551-fab4c27a966605e802b8cab3ef5759602698949610f19603cb74efb1c90096c73</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kdtKAzEQhoMotVYfQdgr71YnyW6yuZTikYJF9Dpk04ld3TY12aX4bj6BT2Vsq3cGhp-fOTFfCMkonFNQ8gLSKwpW5FQpDlVyeQpK98iQllzkwCjskyEAg1wpJQ7JUYyvqYRJ4AMyqLgUyQwJezSzxrf-pYld_PrMphgsrrrGLzPvsmnwDmNMzrTZve9D0nhMDlwSPNnpiDxfXz2Nb_PJw83d-HKSW16WNHemLiyTRgkhoMQKWF1ZU3N0pSyVACZUpQolKDiaLLe1LNDV1CoAJazkI3K2nbsK_r3H2OlFEy22rVmi76PeTJHp3BGptoU2-BgDOr0KzcKED01B_-DSv7j0Hy69wZVaT3c7-nqBs7_GHZ-UL7b5tW87DPGt7dcY9BxN2831f7_AvwFyZ3QR</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>75960715</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Radiologistsʼ Perception of Professional Journals</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Journals@Ovid Complete</source><creator>HUNTER, TIM B ; MARCUS, DAVID S ; WITZKE, DONALD B</creator><creatorcontrib>HUNTER, TIM B ; MARCUS, DAVID S ; WITZKE, DONALD B</creatorcontrib><description>RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES.We assessed radiologistsʼ perceptions of radiologic and general medical journals. METHODS.Five thousand randomly chosen radiologists (4,200 American College of Radiology (ACR) members and 800 members in training) were surveyed by mail concerning their opinion of selected radiology and major medical journals. The mail survey was followed up by a phone survey of 45 previously unsurveyed radiologists from a smaller list of a similar ACR population. RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS.Of the 5,000 surveys mailed out, 987 (20%) were completed and returned. There were no systematic differences in the questionnaire results between those surveyed by phone and those surveyed by mail. In general, academic radiologists, private practice radiologists, and radiologists in training did not differ in their assessment of professional journals. The respondents picked Radiology as their first choice if they were allowed to read only one journal.The respondents believed that Radiology published the best clinical research and Investigative Radiology the best basic science research. American Journal of Roentgenology (AJR), Radiology, and Journal of Computer Assisted Tomography ranked highest for sureness and rapidity of manuscript acceptance and publication, while Radiology, New England Journal of Medicine, and the Journal of the American Medical Association ranked highest in terms of exposure and prestige.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0020-9996</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1536-0210</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1097/00004424-199308000-00011</identifier><identifier>PMID: 8376002</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Lippincott-Raven Publishers</publisher><subject>Attitude of Health Personnel ; Female ; Humans ; Male ; North America ; Periodicals as Topic - statistics &amp; numerical data ; Radiology - statistics &amp; numerical data ; Societies, Medical ; Surveys and Questionnaires ; Workforce</subject><ispartof>Investigative radiology, 1993-08, Vol.28 (8), p.706-709</ispartof><rights>Lippincott-Raven Publishers.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3551-fab4c27a966605e802b8cab3ef5759602698949610f19603cb74efb1c90096c73</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8376002$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>HUNTER, TIM B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>MARCUS, DAVID S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>WITZKE, DONALD B</creatorcontrib><title>Radiologistsʼ Perception of Professional Journals</title><title>Investigative radiology</title><addtitle>Invest Radiol</addtitle><description>RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES.We assessed radiologistsʼ perceptions of radiologic and general medical journals. METHODS.Five thousand randomly chosen radiologists (4,200 American College of Radiology (ACR) members and 800 members in training) were surveyed by mail concerning their opinion of selected radiology and major medical journals. The mail survey was followed up by a phone survey of 45 previously unsurveyed radiologists from a smaller list of a similar ACR population. RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS.Of the 5,000 surveys mailed out, 987 (20%) were completed and returned. There were no systematic differences in the questionnaire results between those surveyed by phone and those surveyed by mail. In general, academic radiologists, private practice radiologists, and radiologists in training did not differ in their assessment of professional journals. The respondents picked Radiology as their first choice if they were allowed to read only one journal.The respondents believed that Radiology published the best clinical research and Investigative Radiology the best basic science research. American Journal of Roentgenology (AJR), Radiology, and Journal of Computer Assisted Tomography ranked highest for sureness and rapidity of manuscript acceptance and publication, while Radiology, New England Journal of Medicine, and the Journal of the American Medical Association ranked highest in terms of exposure and prestige.</description><subject>Attitude of Health Personnel</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>North America</subject><subject>Periodicals as Topic - statistics &amp; numerical data</subject><subject>Radiology - statistics &amp; numerical data</subject><subject>Societies, Medical</subject><subject>Surveys and Questionnaires</subject><subject>Workforce</subject><issn>0020-9996</issn><issn>1536-0210</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1993</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kdtKAzEQhoMotVYfQdgr71YnyW6yuZTikYJF9Dpk04ld3TY12aX4bj6BT2Vsq3cGhp-fOTFfCMkonFNQ8gLSKwpW5FQpDlVyeQpK98iQllzkwCjskyEAg1wpJQ7JUYyvqYRJ4AMyqLgUyQwJezSzxrf-pYld_PrMphgsrrrGLzPvsmnwDmNMzrTZve9D0nhMDlwSPNnpiDxfXz2Nb_PJw83d-HKSW16WNHemLiyTRgkhoMQKWF1ZU3N0pSyVACZUpQolKDiaLLe1LNDV1CoAJazkI3K2nbsK_r3H2OlFEy22rVmi76PeTJHp3BGptoU2-BgDOr0KzcKED01B_-DSv7j0Hy69wZVaT3c7-nqBs7_GHZ-UL7b5tW87DPGt7dcY9BxN2831f7_AvwFyZ3QR</recordid><startdate>199308</startdate><enddate>199308</enddate><creator>HUNTER, TIM B</creator><creator>MARCUS, DAVID S</creator><creator>WITZKE, DONALD B</creator><general>Lippincott-Raven Publishers</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>199308</creationdate><title>Radiologistsʼ Perception of Professional Journals</title><author>HUNTER, TIM B ; MARCUS, DAVID S ; WITZKE, DONALD B</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3551-fab4c27a966605e802b8cab3ef5759602698949610f19603cb74efb1c90096c73</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1993</creationdate><topic>Attitude of Health Personnel</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>North America</topic><topic>Periodicals as Topic - statistics &amp; numerical data</topic><topic>Radiology - statistics &amp; numerical data</topic><topic>Societies, Medical</topic><topic>Surveys and Questionnaires</topic><topic>Workforce</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>HUNTER, TIM B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>MARCUS, DAVID S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>WITZKE, DONALD B</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Investigative radiology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>HUNTER, TIM B</au><au>MARCUS, DAVID S</au><au>WITZKE, DONALD B</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Radiologistsʼ Perception of Professional Journals</atitle><jtitle>Investigative radiology</jtitle><addtitle>Invest Radiol</addtitle><date>1993-08</date><risdate>1993</risdate><volume>28</volume><issue>8</issue><spage>706</spage><epage>709</epage><pages>706-709</pages><issn>0020-9996</issn><eissn>1536-0210</eissn><abstract>RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES.We assessed radiologistsʼ perceptions of radiologic and general medical journals. METHODS.Five thousand randomly chosen radiologists (4,200 American College of Radiology (ACR) members and 800 members in training) were surveyed by mail concerning their opinion of selected radiology and major medical journals. The mail survey was followed up by a phone survey of 45 previously unsurveyed radiologists from a smaller list of a similar ACR population. RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS.Of the 5,000 surveys mailed out, 987 (20%) were completed and returned. There were no systematic differences in the questionnaire results between those surveyed by phone and those surveyed by mail. In general, academic radiologists, private practice radiologists, and radiologists in training did not differ in their assessment of professional journals. The respondents picked Radiology as their first choice if they were allowed to read only one journal.The respondents believed that Radiology published the best clinical research and Investigative Radiology the best basic science research. American Journal of Roentgenology (AJR), Radiology, and Journal of Computer Assisted Tomography ranked highest for sureness and rapidity of manuscript acceptance and publication, while Radiology, New England Journal of Medicine, and the Journal of the American Medical Association ranked highest in terms of exposure and prestige.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Lippincott-Raven Publishers</pub><pmid>8376002</pmid><doi>10.1097/00004424-199308000-00011</doi><tpages>4</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0020-9996
ispartof Investigative radiology, 1993-08, Vol.28 (8), p.706-709
issn 0020-9996
1536-0210
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_75960715
source MEDLINE; Journals@Ovid Complete
subjects Attitude of Health Personnel
Female
Humans
Male
North America
Periodicals as Topic - statistics & numerical data
Radiology - statistics & numerical data
Societies, Medical
Surveys and Questionnaires
Workforce
title Radiologistsʼ Perception of Professional Journals
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-27T03%3A22%3A09IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Radiologists%CA%BC%20Perception%20of%20Professional%20Journals&rft.jtitle=Investigative%20radiology&rft.au=HUNTER,%20TIM%20B&rft.date=1993-08&rft.volume=28&rft.issue=8&rft.spage=706&rft.epage=709&rft.pages=706-709&rft.issn=0020-9996&rft.eissn=1536-0210&rft_id=info:doi/10.1097/00004424-199308000-00011&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E75960715%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=75960715&rft_id=info:pmid/8376002&rfr_iscdi=true