Use of remote video microscopy (telepathology) as an adjunct to neurosurgical frozen section consultation
We investigated the use of remote video microscopy (telepathology) to assist in the diagnosis of 52 neurosurgical frozen section cases. The TelMed system (Discovery Medical Systems, Overland Park, KS), in which the referring pathologist selects appropriate fields for transmission to the consultant,...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Human pathology 1993-08, Vol.24 (8), p.909-911 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 911 |
---|---|
container_issue | 8 |
container_start_page | 909 |
container_title | Human pathology |
container_volume | 24 |
creator | Becker, R.L. Specht, C.S. Jones, R. Rueda-Pedraza, M.E. O'Leary, T.J. |
description | We investigated the use of remote video microscopy (telepathology) to assist in the diagnosis of 52 neurosurgical frozen section cases. The TelMed system (Discovery Medical Systems, Overland Park, KS), in which the referring pathologist selects appropriate fields for transmission to the consultant, was used for the study. There was a high degree of concordance between the diagnosis rendered on the basis of transmitted video images and that rendered on the basis of direct evaluation of frozen sections; however, in seven cases there was substantial disagreement. Remote evaluation was associated with a more rapid consultation from the standpoint of the consultant, who spent approximately 2 minutes less per case when using remote microscopy; this was achieved at the expense of considerably greater effort on the part of the referring pathologist, who spent approximately 16 minutes per case selecting an average of 4.5 images for transmission to the consultant. The use of remote video microscopy for pathology consultation is associated with a complex series of tradeoffs involving cost, information loss, and timeliness of consultation. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/0046-8177(93)90142-4 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_75955045</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>0046817793901424</els_id><sourcerecordid>75955045</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c386t-8f9f6a2fa3623eba96bd5713e5499f6fc5fd3d63c5b085a640781f741e3de363</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kc9LHDEUx0Np0a36H7SQQxE9jE0mP2bmIoi0tSB4seeQTV5sZCZZk4yw_vVmussee3qE7-c93vsEoS-UXFFC5XdCuGx62nUXA7scCOVtwz-gFRWsbXo2tB_R6oAco885PxNCqeDiCB31rBO9JCvk_2TA0eEEUyyAX72FiCdvUswmbrb4osAIG13-xjE-bS-xzlgHrO3zHEzBJeIAc2Xn9OSNHrFL8Q0CzmCKjwGbGPI8Fr08TtEnp8cMZ_t6gh5__ni8vWvuH379vr25bwzrZWl6NzipW6eZbBms9SDXVnSUgeBDTZwRzjIrmRFr0gstOel66jpOgVlgkp2g893YTYovM-SiJp8NjKMOEOesOjEIQbioIN-By605gVOb5CedtooStQhWiz212FMDU_8EK17bvu7nz-sJ7KFpb7Tm3_a5ztWISzoYnw8Y6yStn1Cx6x0GVcWrh6Sy8RAMWJ-qPGWj__8e7-GemKU</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>75955045</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Use of remote video microscopy (telepathology) as an adjunct to neurosurgical frozen section consultation</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Becker, R.L. ; Specht, C.S. ; Jones, R. ; Rueda-Pedraza, M.E. ; O'Leary, T.J.</creator><creatorcontrib>Becker, R.L. ; Specht, C.S. ; Jones, R. ; Rueda-Pedraza, M.E. ; O'Leary, T.J.</creatorcontrib><description>We investigated the use of remote video microscopy (telepathology) to assist in the diagnosis of 52 neurosurgical frozen section cases. The TelMed system (Discovery Medical Systems, Overland Park, KS), in which the referring pathologist selects appropriate fields for transmission to the consultant, was used for the study. There was a high degree of concordance between the diagnosis rendered on the basis of transmitted video images and that rendered on the basis of direct evaluation of frozen sections; however, in seven cases there was substantial disagreement. Remote evaluation was associated with a more rapid consultation from the standpoint of the consultant, who spent approximately 2 minutes less per case when using remote microscopy; this was achieved at the expense of considerably greater effort on the part of the referring pathologist, who spent approximately 16 minutes per case selecting an average of 4.5 images for transmission to the consultant. The use of remote video microscopy for pathology consultation is associated with a complex series of tradeoffs involving cost, information loss, and timeliness of consultation.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0046-8177</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1532-8392</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/0046-8177(93)90142-4</identifier><identifier>PMID: 8375860</identifier><identifier>CODEN: HPCQA4</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York, NY: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Biological and medical sciences ; Frozen Sections ; Humans ; Investigative techniques, diagnostic techniques (general aspects) ; Medical sciences ; Microscopy - methods ; Nervous system ; Neurosurgery ; Pathology. Cytology. Biochemistry. Spectrometry. Miscellaneous investigative techniques ; Referral and Consultation ; Robotics ; Telemedicine ; Time Factors</subject><ispartof>Human pathology, 1993-08, Vol.24 (8), p.909-911</ispartof><rights>1993</rights><rights>1994 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c386t-8f9f6a2fa3623eba96bd5713e5499f6fc5fd3d63c5b085a640781f741e3de363</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c386t-8f9f6a2fa3623eba96bd5713e5499f6fc5fd3d63c5b085a640781f741e3de363</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0046817793901424$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,27901,27902,65306</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=3761115$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8375860$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Becker, R.L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Specht, C.S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jones, R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rueda-Pedraza, M.E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>O'Leary, T.J.</creatorcontrib><title>Use of remote video microscopy (telepathology) as an adjunct to neurosurgical frozen section consultation</title><title>Human pathology</title><addtitle>Hum Pathol</addtitle><description>We investigated the use of remote video microscopy (telepathology) to assist in the diagnosis of 52 neurosurgical frozen section cases. The TelMed system (Discovery Medical Systems, Overland Park, KS), in which the referring pathologist selects appropriate fields for transmission to the consultant, was used for the study. There was a high degree of concordance between the diagnosis rendered on the basis of transmitted video images and that rendered on the basis of direct evaluation of frozen sections; however, in seven cases there was substantial disagreement. Remote evaluation was associated with a more rapid consultation from the standpoint of the consultant, who spent approximately 2 minutes less per case when using remote microscopy; this was achieved at the expense of considerably greater effort on the part of the referring pathologist, who spent approximately 16 minutes per case selecting an average of 4.5 images for transmission to the consultant. The use of remote video microscopy for pathology consultation is associated with a complex series of tradeoffs involving cost, information loss, and timeliness of consultation.</description><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Frozen Sections</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Investigative techniques, diagnostic techniques (general aspects)</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Microscopy - methods</subject><subject>Nervous system</subject><subject>Neurosurgery</subject><subject>Pathology. Cytology. Biochemistry. Spectrometry. Miscellaneous investigative techniques</subject><subject>Referral and Consultation</subject><subject>Robotics</subject><subject>Telemedicine</subject><subject>Time Factors</subject><issn>0046-8177</issn><issn>1532-8392</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1993</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kc9LHDEUx0Np0a36H7SQQxE9jE0mP2bmIoi0tSB4seeQTV5sZCZZk4yw_vVmussee3qE7-c93vsEoS-UXFFC5XdCuGx62nUXA7scCOVtwz-gFRWsbXo2tB_R6oAco885PxNCqeDiCB31rBO9JCvk_2TA0eEEUyyAX72FiCdvUswmbrb4osAIG13-xjE-bS-xzlgHrO3zHEzBJeIAc2Xn9OSNHrFL8Q0CzmCKjwGbGPI8Fr08TtEnp8cMZ_t6gh5__ni8vWvuH379vr25bwzrZWl6NzipW6eZbBms9SDXVnSUgeBDTZwRzjIrmRFr0gstOel66jpOgVlgkp2g893YTYovM-SiJp8NjKMOEOesOjEIQbioIN-By605gVOb5CedtooStQhWiz212FMDU_8EK17bvu7nz-sJ7KFpb7Tm3_a5ztWISzoYnw8Y6yStn1Cx6x0GVcWrh6Sy8RAMWJ-qPGWj__8e7-GemKU</recordid><startdate>19930801</startdate><enddate>19930801</enddate><creator>Becker, R.L.</creator><creator>Specht, C.S.</creator><creator>Jones, R.</creator><creator>Rueda-Pedraza, M.E.</creator><creator>O'Leary, T.J.</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><general>Elsevier</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19930801</creationdate><title>Use of remote video microscopy (telepathology) as an adjunct to neurosurgical frozen section consultation</title><author>Becker, R.L. ; Specht, C.S. ; Jones, R. ; Rueda-Pedraza, M.E. ; O'Leary, T.J.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c386t-8f9f6a2fa3623eba96bd5713e5499f6fc5fd3d63c5b085a640781f741e3de363</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1993</creationdate><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Frozen Sections</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Investigative techniques, diagnostic techniques (general aspects)</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Microscopy - methods</topic><topic>Nervous system</topic><topic>Neurosurgery</topic><topic>Pathology. Cytology. Biochemistry. Spectrometry. Miscellaneous investigative techniques</topic><topic>Referral and Consultation</topic><topic>Robotics</topic><topic>Telemedicine</topic><topic>Time Factors</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Becker, R.L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Specht, C.S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jones, R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rueda-Pedraza, M.E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>O'Leary, T.J.</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Human pathology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Becker, R.L.</au><au>Specht, C.S.</au><au>Jones, R.</au><au>Rueda-Pedraza, M.E.</au><au>O'Leary, T.J.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Use of remote video microscopy (telepathology) as an adjunct to neurosurgical frozen section consultation</atitle><jtitle>Human pathology</jtitle><addtitle>Hum Pathol</addtitle><date>1993-08-01</date><risdate>1993</risdate><volume>24</volume><issue>8</issue><spage>909</spage><epage>911</epage><pages>909-911</pages><issn>0046-8177</issn><eissn>1532-8392</eissn><coden>HPCQA4</coden><abstract>We investigated the use of remote video microscopy (telepathology) to assist in the diagnosis of 52 neurosurgical frozen section cases. The TelMed system (Discovery Medical Systems, Overland Park, KS), in which the referring pathologist selects appropriate fields for transmission to the consultant, was used for the study. There was a high degree of concordance between the diagnosis rendered on the basis of transmitted video images and that rendered on the basis of direct evaluation of frozen sections; however, in seven cases there was substantial disagreement. Remote evaluation was associated with a more rapid consultation from the standpoint of the consultant, who spent approximately 2 minutes less per case when using remote microscopy; this was achieved at the expense of considerably greater effort on the part of the referring pathologist, who spent approximately 16 minutes per case selecting an average of 4.5 images for transmission to the consultant. The use of remote video microscopy for pathology consultation is associated with a complex series of tradeoffs involving cost, information loss, and timeliness of consultation.</abstract><cop>New York, NY</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>8375860</pmid><doi>10.1016/0046-8177(93)90142-4</doi><tpages>3</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0046-8177 |
ispartof | Human pathology, 1993-08, Vol.24 (8), p.909-911 |
issn | 0046-8177 1532-8392 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_75955045 |
source | MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals |
subjects | Biological and medical sciences Frozen Sections Humans Investigative techniques, diagnostic techniques (general aspects) Medical sciences Microscopy - methods Nervous system Neurosurgery Pathology. Cytology. Biochemistry. Spectrometry. Miscellaneous investigative techniques Referral and Consultation Robotics Telemedicine Time Factors |
title | Use of remote video microscopy (telepathology) as an adjunct to neurosurgical frozen section consultation |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-30T03%3A57%3A51IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Use%20of%20remote%20video%20microscopy%20(telepathology)%20as%20an%20adjunct%20to%20neurosurgical%20frozen%20section%20consultation&rft.jtitle=Human%20pathology&rft.au=Becker,%20R.L.&rft.date=1993-08-01&rft.volume=24&rft.issue=8&rft.spage=909&rft.epage=911&rft.pages=909-911&rft.issn=0046-8177&rft.eissn=1532-8392&rft.coden=HPCQA4&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/0046-8177(93)90142-4&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E75955045%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=75955045&rft_id=info:pmid/8375860&rft_els_id=0046817793901424&rfr_iscdi=true |