Use of remote video microscopy (telepathology) as an adjunct to neurosurgical frozen section consultation

We investigated the use of remote video microscopy (telepathology) to assist in the diagnosis of 52 neurosurgical frozen section cases. The TelMed system (Discovery Medical Systems, Overland Park, KS), in which the referring pathologist selects appropriate fields for transmission to the consultant,...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Human pathology 1993-08, Vol.24 (8), p.909-911
Hauptverfasser: Becker, R.L., Specht, C.S., Jones, R., Rueda-Pedraza, M.E., O'Leary, T.J.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 911
container_issue 8
container_start_page 909
container_title Human pathology
container_volume 24
creator Becker, R.L.
Specht, C.S.
Jones, R.
Rueda-Pedraza, M.E.
O'Leary, T.J.
description We investigated the use of remote video microscopy (telepathology) to assist in the diagnosis of 52 neurosurgical frozen section cases. The TelMed system (Discovery Medical Systems, Overland Park, KS), in which the referring pathologist selects appropriate fields for transmission to the consultant, was used for the study. There was a high degree of concordance between the diagnosis rendered on the basis of transmitted video images and that rendered on the basis of direct evaluation of frozen sections; however, in seven cases there was substantial disagreement. Remote evaluation was associated with a more rapid consultation from the standpoint of the consultant, who spent approximately 2 minutes less per case when using remote microscopy; this was achieved at the expense of considerably greater effort on the part of the referring pathologist, who spent approximately 16 minutes per case selecting an average of 4.5 images for transmission to the consultant. The use of remote video microscopy for pathology consultation is associated with a complex series of tradeoffs involving cost, information loss, and timeliness of consultation.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/0046-8177(93)90142-4
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_75955045</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>0046817793901424</els_id><sourcerecordid>75955045</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c386t-8f9f6a2fa3623eba96bd5713e5499f6fc5fd3d63c5b085a640781f741e3de363</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kc9LHDEUx0Np0a36H7SQQxE9jE0mP2bmIoi0tSB4seeQTV5sZCZZk4yw_vVmussee3qE7-c93vsEoS-UXFFC5XdCuGx62nUXA7scCOVtwz-gFRWsbXo2tB_R6oAco885PxNCqeDiCB31rBO9JCvk_2TA0eEEUyyAX72FiCdvUswmbrb4osAIG13-xjE-bS-xzlgHrO3zHEzBJeIAc2Xn9OSNHrFL8Q0CzmCKjwGbGPI8Fr08TtEnp8cMZ_t6gh5__ni8vWvuH379vr25bwzrZWl6NzipW6eZbBms9SDXVnSUgeBDTZwRzjIrmRFr0gstOel66jpOgVlgkp2g893YTYovM-SiJp8NjKMOEOesOjEIQbioIN-By605gVOb5CedtooStQhWiz212FMDU_8EK17bvu7nz-sJ7KFpb7Tm3_a5ztWISzoYnw8Y6yStn1Cx6x0GVcWrh6Sy8RAMWJ-qPGWj__8e7-GemKU</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>75955045</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Use of remote video microscopy (telepathology) as an adjunct to neurosurgical frozen section consultation</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Becker, R.L. ; Specht, C.S. ; Jones, R. ; Rueda-Pedraza, M.E. ; O'Leary, T.J.</creator><creatorcontrib>Becker, R.L. ; Specht, C.S. ; Jones, R. ; Rueda-Pedraza, M.E. ; O'Leary, T.J.</creatorcontrib><description>We investigated the use of remote video microscopy (telepathology) to assist in the diagnosis of 52 neurosurgical frozen section cases. The TelMed system (Discovery Medical Systems, Overland Park, KS), in which the referring pathologist selects appropriate fields for transmission to the consultant, was used for the study. There was a high degree of concordance between the diagnosis rendered on the basis of transmitted video images and that rendered on the basis of direct evaluation of frozen sections; however, in seven cases there was substantial disagreement. Remote evaluation was associated with a more rapid consultation from the standpoint of the consultant, who spent approximately 2 minutes less per case when using remote microscopy; this was achieved at the expense of considerably greater effort on the part of the referring pathologist, who spent approximately 16 minutes per case selecting an average of 4.5 images for transmission to the consultant. The use of remote video microscopy for pathology consultation is associated with a complex series of tradeoffs involving cost, information loss, and timeliness of consultation.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0046-8177</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1532-8392</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/0046-8177(93)90142-4</identifier><identifier>PMID: 8375860</identifier><identifier>CODEN: HPCQA4</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York, NY: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Biological and medical sciences ; Frozen Sections ; Humans ; Investigative techniques, diagnostic techniques (general aspects) ; Medical sciences ; Microscopy - methods ; Nervous system ; Neurosurgery ; Pathology. Cytology. Biochemistry. Spectrometry. Miscellaneous investigative techniques ; Referral and Consultation ; Robotics ; Telemedicine ; Time Factors</subject><ispartof>Human pathology, 1993-08, Vol.24 (8), p.909-911</ispartof><rights>1993</rights><rights>1994 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c386t-8f9f6a2fa3623eba96bd5713e5499f6fc5fd3d63c5b085a640781f741e3de363</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c386t-8f9f6a2fa3623eba96bd5713e5499f6fc5fd3d63c5b085a640781f741e3de363</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0046817793901424$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,27901,27902,65306</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=3761115$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8375860$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Becker, R.L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Specht, C.S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jones, R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rueda-Pedraza, M.E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>O'Leary, T.J.</creatorcontrib><title>Use of remote video microscopy (telepathology) as an adjunct to neurosurgical frozen section consultation</title><title>Human pathology</title><addtitle>Hum Pathol</addtitle><description>We investigated the use of remote video microscopy (telepathology) to assist in the diagnosis of 52 neurosurgical frozen section cases. The TelMed system (Discovery Medical Systems, Overland Park, KS), in which the referring pathologist selects appropriate fields for transmission to the consultant, was used for the study. There was a high degree of concordance between the diagnosis rendered on the basis of transmitted video images and that rendered on the basis of direct evaluation of frozen sections; however, in seven cases there was substantial disagreement. Remote evaluation was associated with a more rapid consultation from the standpoint of the consultant, who spent approximately 2 minutes less per case when using remote microscopy; this was achieved at the expense of considerably greater effort on the part of the referring pathologist, who spent approximately 16 minutes per case selecting an average of 4.5 images for transmission to the consultant. The use of remote video microscopy for pathology consultation is associated with a complex series of tradeoffs involving cost, information loss, and timeliness of consultation.</description><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Frozen Sections</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Investigative techniques, diagnostic techniques (general aspects)</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Microscopy - methods</subject><subject>Nervous system</subject><subject>Neurosurgery</subject><subject>Pathology. Cytology. Biochemistry. Spectrometry. Miscellaneous investigative techniques</subject><subject>Referral and Consultation</subject><subject>Robotics</subject><subject>Telemedicine</subject><subject>Time Factors</subject><issn>0046-8177</issn><issn>1532-8392</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1993</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kc9LHDEUx0Np0a36H7SQQxE9jE0mP2bmIoi0tSB4seeQTV5sZCZZk4yw_vVmussee3qE7-c93vsEoS-UXFFC5XdCuGx62nUXA7scCOVtwz-gFRWsbXo2tB_R6oAco885PxNCqeDiCB31rBO9JCvk_2TA0eEEUyyAX72FiCdvUswmbrb4osAIG13-xjE-bS-xzlgHrO3zHEzBJeIAc2Xn9OSNHrFL8Q0CzmCKjwGbGPI8Fr08TtEnp8cMZ_t6gh5__ni8vWvuH379vr25bwzrZWl6NzipW6eZbBms9SDXVnSUgeBDTZwRzjIrmRFr0gstOel66jpOgVlgkp2g893YTYovM-SiJp8NjKMOEOesOjEIQbioIN-By605gVOb5CedtooStQhWiz212FMDU_8EK17bvu7nz-sJ7KFpb7Tm3_a5ztWISzoYnw8Y6yStn1Cx6x0GVcWrh6Sy8RAMWJ-qPGWj__8e7-GemKU</recordid><startdate>19930801</startdate><enddate>19930801</enddate><creator>Becker, R.L.</creator><creator>Specht, C.S.</creator><creator>Jones, R.</creator><creator>Rueda-Pedraza, M.E.</creator><creator>O'Leary, T.J.</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><general>Elsevier</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19930801</creationdate><title>Use of remote video microscopy (telepathology) as an adjunct to neurosurgical frozen section consultation</title><author>Becker, R.L. ; Specht, C.S. ; Jones, R. ; Rueda-Pedraza, M.E. ; O'Leary, T.J.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c386t-8f9f6a2fa3623eba96bd5713e5499f6fc5fd3d63c5b085a640781f741e3de363</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1993</creationdate><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Frozen Sections</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Investigative techniques, diagnostic techniques (general aspects)</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Microscopy - methods</topic><topic>Nervous system</topic><topic>Neurosurgery</topic><topic>Pathology. Cytology. Biochemistry. Spectrometry. Miscellaneous investigative techniques</topic><topic>Referral and Consultation</topic><topic>Robotics</topic><topic>Telemedicine</topic><topic>Time Factors</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Becker, R.L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Specht, C.S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jones, R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rueda-Pedraza, M.E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>O'Leary, T.J.</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Human pathology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Becker, R.L.</au><au>Specht, C.S.</au><au>Jones, R.</au><au>Rueda-Pedraza, M.E.</au><au>O'Leary, T.J.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Use of remote video microscopy (telepathology) as an adjunct to neurosurgical frozen section consultation</atitle><jtitle>Human pathology</jtitle><addtitle>Hum Pathol</addtitle><date>1993-08-01</date><risdate>1993</risdate><volume>24</volume><issue>8</issue><spage>909</spage><epage>911</epage><pages>909-911</pages><issn>0046-8177</issn><eissn>1532-8392</eissn><coden>HPCQA4</coden><abstract>We investigated the use of remote video microscopy (telepathology) to assist in the diagnosis of 52 neurosurgical frozen section cases. The TelMed system (Discovery Medical Systems, Overland Park, KS), in which the referring pathologist selects appropriate fields for transmission to the consultant, was used for the study. There was a high degree of concordance between the diagnosis rendered on the basis of transmitted video images and that rendered on the basis of direct evaluation of frozen sections; however, in seven cases there was substantial disagreement. Remote evaluation was associated with a more rapid consultation from the standpoint of the consultant, who spent approximately 2 minutes less per case when using remote microscopy; this was achieved at the expense of considerably greater effort on the part of the referring pathologist, who spent approximately 16 minutes per case selecting an average of 4.5 images for transmission to the consultant. The use of remote video microscopy for pathology consultation is associated with a complex series of tradeoffs involving cost, information loss, and timeliness of consultation.</abstract><cop>New York, NY</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>8375860</pmid><doi>10.1016/0046-8177(93)90142-4</doi><tpages>3</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0046-8177
ispartof Human pathology, 1993-08, Vol.24 (8), p.909-911
issn 0046-8177
1532-8392
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_75955045
source MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals
subjects Biological and medical sciences
Frozen Sections
Humans
Investigative techniques, diagnostic techniques (general aspects)
Medical sciences
Microscopy - methods
Nervous system
Neurosurgery
Pathology. Cytology. Biochemistry. Spectrometry. Miscellaneous investigative techniques
Referral and Consultation
Robotics
Telemedicine
Time Factors
title Use of remote video microscopy (telepathology) as an adjunct to neurosurgical frozen section consultation
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-30T03%3A57%3A51IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Use%20of%20remote%20video%20microscopy%20(telepathology)%20as%20an%20adjunct%20to%20neurosurgical%20frozen%20section%20consultation&rft.jtitle=Human%20pathology&rft.au=Becker,%20R.L.&rft.date=1993-08-01&rft.volume=24&rft.issue=8&rft.spage=909&rft.epage=911&rft.pages=909-911&rft.issn=0046-8177&rft.eissn=1532-8392&rft.coden=HPCQA4&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/0046-8177(93)90142-4&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E75955045%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=75955045&rft_id=info:pmid/8375860&rft_els_id=0046817793901424&rfr_iscdi=true