A clinical evaluation of two glass ionomer cements in primary molars using atraumatic restorative treatment technique in India: 1 year follow up
International Journal of Paediatric Dentistry 2010; 20: 410–418 Aim. To compare the clinical performance of two glass ionomer cements, Amalgomer CR and Fuji IX in small and medium cavities prepared using Atraumatic restorative treatment approach in India. Study design. One hundred school children...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | International journal of paediatric dentistry 2010-11, Vol.20 (6), p.410-418 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 418 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 6 |
| container_start_page | 410 |
| container_title | International journal of paediatric dentistry |
| container_volume | 20 |
| creator | DEEPA, GURUNATHAN SHOBHA, TANDON |
| description | International Journal of Paediatric Dentistry 2010; 20: 410–418
Aim. To compare the clinical performance of two glass ionomer cements, Amalgomer CR and Fuji IX in small and medium cavities prepared using Atraumatic restorative treatment approach in India.
Study design. One hundred school children in the age group of 4–9 years who had bilateral matched pair of carious lesions in primary posterior teeth were included. A split mouth design was used in which two materials were randomly placed in contralateral sides. The performance of the restorations was assessed after 1 year using Frenken’s criteria (1996).Survival analysis of restoration was done using chi‐square test.
Results. The survival rate of Amalgomer CR and Fuji IX class I restorations were 97.4% and 94.9%, respectively. In class II cavities 95.1% and 88.5% of Amalgomer CR and Fuji IX restorations were successful. Amalgomer CR and Fuji IX showed a success of 94.2% and 92.3% in small sized class II cavities. Amalgomer CR showed a 100% success for medium sized class I and II restorations. Whereas Fuji IX showed a 100% and 66.7% success in medium sized class I and II cavities.
Conclusion. The clinical performances of both materials were satisfactory at the end of 1 year and ART is suitable procedure to be done in a dental clinic for children. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1111/j.1365-263X.2010.01067.x |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_759522379</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>759522379</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4067-59039f5da2abaa380461f88c1c7fe611e738ec111177bb921f2bd7dcfb2aedcf3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNUc2O0zAQthCI7S68AvKNU4rtJHaCxGHVhd2ulp8DsNwsx5ksLk5cbGfb3pB4Ax6RJ8GhpWcsWTOe-b5vPDMIYUrmNJ0XqznNeZkxnn-ZM5Ki6XIx3z5As2PiIZqRmpNMFHl9gk5DWBFCS8LIY3TCCC9YwcUM_TrH2prBaGUx3Cs7qmjcgF2H48bhO6tCwCngevBYQw9DTO8Br73pld_h3lnlAx6DGe6wil6NfRLQ2EOIzif3HnD0oOLExBH018F8H2GSWA6tUS8x_f3j5w6Ux52z1m3wuH6CHnXKBnh6sGfo05vXHxdX2c37y-Xi_CbTRWo2K2uS113ZKqYapfKKFJx2VaWpFh1wSkHkFehpXEI0Tc1ox5pWtLprmIJk8jP0fK-79i79KUTZm6DBWjWAG4MUZV0ylos6Ias9UnsXgodOHvqXlMipglzJae5ymrucFiL_LkRuE_XZocjY9NAeif82kACv9oCNsbD7b2G5_HAxeYmf7fkmRNge-cp_kykrSnn77lIuCL_9TK6v5dv8Dw08rbk</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>759522379</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>A clinical evaluation of two glass ionomer cements in primary molars using atraumatic restorative treatment technique in India: 1 year follow up</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><creator>DEEPA, GURUNATHAN ; SHOBHA, TANDON</creator><creatorcontrib>DEEPA, GURUNATHAN ; SHOBHA, TANDON</creatorcontrib><description>International Journal of Paediatric Dentistry 2010; 20: 410–418
Aim. To compare the clinical performance of two glass ionomer cements, Amalgomer CR and Fuji IX in small and medium cavities prepared using Atraumatic restorative treatment approach in India.
Study design. One hundred school children in the age group of 4–9 years who had bilateral matched pair of carious lesions in primary posterior teeth were included. A split mouth design was used in which two materials were randomly placed in contralateral sides. The performance of the restorations was assessed after 1 year using Frenken’s criteria (1996).Survival analysis of restoration was done using chi‐square test.
Results. The survival rate of Amalgomer CR and Fuji IX class I restorations were 97.4% and 94.9%, respectively. In class II cavities 95.1% and 88.5% of Amalgomer CR and Fuji IX restorations were successful. Amalgomer CR and Fuji IX showed a success of 94.2% and 92.3% in small sized class II cavities. Amalgomer CR showed a 100% success for medium sized class I and II restorations. Whereas Fuji IX showed a 100% and 66.7% success in medium sized class I and II cavities.
Conclusion. The clinical performances of both materials were satisfactory at the end of 1 year and ART is suitable procedure to be done in a dental clinic for children.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0960-7439</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1365-263X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-263X.2010.01067.x</identifier><identifier>PMID: 20642467</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Chi-Square Distribution ; Child ; Child, Preschool ; Dental Atraumatic Restorative Treatment - methods ; Dental Care for Children - methods ; Dental Caries - therapy ; Dental Restoration, Permanent - methods ; Dentistry ; Follow-Up Studies ; Glass Ionomer Cements - therapeutic use ; Humans ; Molar ; Survival Analysis ; Tooth, Deciduous ; Treatment Outcome</subject><ispartof>International journal of paediatric dentistry, 2010-11, Vol.20 (6), p.410-418</ispartof><rights>2010 The Authors. International Journal of Paediatric Dentistry © 2010 BSPD, IAPD and Blackwell Publishing Ltd</rights><rights>2010 The Authors. International Journal of Paediatric Dentistry © 2010 BSPD, IAPD and Blackwell Publishing Ltd.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4067-59039f5da2abaa380461f88c1c7fe611e738ec111177bb921f2bd7dcfb2aedcf3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4067-59039f5da2abaa380461f88c1c7fe611e738ec111177bb921f2bd7dcfb2aedcf3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fj.1365-263X.2010.01067.x$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fj.1365-263X.2010.01067.x$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,27901,27902,45550,45551</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20642467$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>DEEPA, GURUNATHAN</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>SHOBHA, TANDON</creatorcontrib><title>A clinical evaluation of two glass ionomer cements in primary molars using atraumatic restorative treatment technique in India: 1 year follow up</title><title>International journal of paediatric dentistry</title><addtitle>Int J Paediatr Dent</addtitle><description>International Journal of Paediatric Dentistry 2010; 20: 410–418
Aim. To compare the clinical performance of two glass ionomer cements, Amalgomer CR and Fuji IX in small and medium cavities prepared using Atraumatic restorative treatment approach in India.
Study design. One hundred school children in the age group of 4–9 years who had bilateral matched pair of carious lesions in primary posterior teeth were included. A split mouth design was used in which two materials were randomly placed in contralateral sides. The performance of the restorations was assessed after 1 year using Frenken’s criteria (1996).Survival analysis of restoration was done using chi‐square test.
Results. The survival rate of Amalgomer CR and Fuji IX class I restorations were 97.4% and 94.9%, respectively. In class II cavities 95.1% and 88.5% of Amalgomer CR and Fuji IX restorations were successful. Amalgomer CR and Fuji IX showed a success of 94.2% and 92.3% in small sized class II cavities. Amalgomer CR showed a 100% success for medium sized class I and II restorations. Whereas Fuji IX showed a 100% and 66.7% success in medium sized class I and II cavities.
Conclusion. The clinical performances of both materials were satisfactory at the end of 1 year and ART is suitable procedure to be done in a dental clinic for children.</description><subject>Chi-Square Distribution</subject><subject>Child</subject><subject>Child, Preschool</subject><subject>Dental Atraumatic Restorative Treatment - methods</subject><subject>Dental Care for Children - methods</subject><subject>Dental Caries - therapy</subject><subject>Dental Restoration, Permanent - methods</subject><subject>Dentistry</subject><subject>Follow-Up Studies</subject><subject>Glass Ionomer Cements - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Molar</subject><subject>Survival Analysis</subject><subject>Tooth, Deciduous</subject><subject>Treatment Outcome</subject><issn>0960-7439</issn><issn>1365-263X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2010</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqNUc2O0zAQthCI7S68AvKNU4rtJHaCxGHVhd2ulp8DsNwsx5ksLk5cbGfb3pB4Ax6RJ8GhpWcsWTOe-b5vPDMIYUrmNJ0XqznNeZkxnn-ZM5Ki6XIx3z5As2PiIZqRmpNMFHl9gk5DWBFCS8LIY3TCCC9YwcUM_TrH2prBaGUx3Cs7qmjcgF2H48bhO6tCwCngevBYQw9DTO8Br73pld_h3lnlAx6DGe6wil6NfRLQ2EOIzif3HnD0oOLExBH018F8H2GSWA6tUS8x_f3j5w6Ux52z1m3wuH6CHnXKBnh6sGfo05vXHxdX2c37y-Xi_CbTRWo2K2uS113ZKqYapfKKFJx2VaWpFh1wSkHkFehpXEI0Tc1ox5pWtLprmIJk8jP0fK-79i79KUTZm6DBWjWAG4MUZV0ylos6Ias9UnsXgodOHvqXlMipglzJae5ymrucFiL_LkRuE_XZocjY9NAeif82kACv9oCNsbD7b2G5_HAxeYmf7fkmRNge-cp_kykrSnn77lIuCL_9TK6v5dv8Dw08rbk</recordid><startdate>201011</startdate><enddate>201011</enddate><creator>DEEPA, GURUNATHAN</creator><creator>SHOBHA, TANDON</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201011</creationdate><title>A clinical evaluation of two glass ionomer cements in primary molars using atraumatic restorative treatment technique in India: 1 year follow up</title><author>DEEPA, GURUNATHAN ; SHOBHA, TANDON</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4067-59039f5da2abaa380461f88c1c7fe611e738ec111177bb921f2bd7dcfb2aedcf3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2010</creationdate><topic>Chi-Square Distribution</topic><topic>Child</topic><topic>Child, Preschool</topic><topic>Dental Atraumatic Restorative Treatment - methods</topic><topic>Dental Care for Children - methods</topic><topic>Dental Caries - therapy</topic><topic>Dental Restoration, Permanent - methods</topic><topic>Dentistry</topic><topic>Follow-Up Studies</topic><topic>Glass Ionomer Cements - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Molar</topic><topic>Survival Analysis</topic><topic>Tooth, Deciduous</topic><topic>Treatment Outcome</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>DEEPA, GURUNATHAN</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>SHOBHA, TANDON</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>International journal of paediatric dentistry</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>DEEPA, GURUNATHAN</au><au>SHOBHA, TANDON</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>A clinical evaluation of two glass ionomer cements in primary molars using atraumatic restorative treatment technique in India: 1 year follow up</atitle><jtitle>International journal of paediatric dentistry</jtitle><addtitle>Int J Paediatr Dent</addtitle><date>2010-11</date><risdate>2010</risdate><volume>20</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>410</spage><epage>418</epage><pages>410-418</pages><issn>0960-7439</issn><eissn>1365-263X</eissn><abstract>International Journal of Paediatric Dentistry 2010; 20: 410–418
Aim. To compare the clinical performance of two glass ionomer cements, Amalgomer CR and Fuji IX in small and medium cavities prepared using Atraumatic restorative treatment approach in India.
Study design. One hundred school children in the age group of 4–9 years who had bilateral matched pair of carious lesions in primary posterior teeth were included. A split mouth design was used in which two materials were randomly placed in contralateral sides. The performance of the restorations was assessed after 1 year using Frenken’s criteria (1996).Survival analysis of restoration was done using chi‐square test.
Results. The survival rate of Amalgomer CR and Fuji IX class I restorations were 97.4% and 94.9%, respectively. In class II cavities 95.1% and 88.5% of Amalgomer CR and Fuji IX restorations were successful. Amalgomer CR and Fuji IX showed a success of 94.2% and 92.3% in small sized class II cavities. Amalgomer CR showed a 100% success for medium sized class I and II restorations. Whereas Fuji IX showed a 100% and 66.7% success in medium sized class I and II cavities.
Conclusion. The clinical performances of both materials were satisfactory at the end of 1 year and ART is suitable procedure to be done in a dental clinic for children.</abstract><cop>Oxford, UK</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><pmid>20642467</pmid><doi>10.1111/j.1365-263X.2010.01067.x</doi><tpages>9</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0960-7439 |
| ispartof | International journal of paediatric dentistry, 2010-11, Vol.20 (6), p.410-418 |
| issn | 0960-7439 1365-263X |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_759522379 |
| source | MEDLINE; Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete |
| subjects | Chi-Square Distribution Child Child, Preschool Dental Atraumatic Restorative Treatment - methods Dental Care for Children - methods Dental Caries - therapy Dental Restoration, Permanent - methods Dentistry Follow-Up Studies Glass Ionomer Cements - therapeutic use Humans Molar Survival Analysis Tooth, Deciduous Treatment Outcome |
| title | A clinical evaluation of two glass ionomer cements in primary molars using atraumatic restorative treatment technique in India: 1 year follow up |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-21T21%3A10%3A02IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20clinical%20evaluation%20of%20two%20glass%20ionomer%20cements%20in%20primary%20molars%20using%20atraumatic%20restorative%20treatment%20technique%20in%20India:%201%E2%80%83year%20follow%20up&rft.jtitle=International%20journal%20of%20paediatric%20dentistry&rft.au=DEEPA,%20GURUNATHAN&rft.date=2010-11&rft.volume=20&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=410&rft.epage=418&rft.pages=410-418&rft.issn=0960-7439&rft.eissn=1365-263X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/j.1365-263X.2010.01067.x&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E759522379%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=759522379&rft_id=info:pmid/20642467&rfr_iscdi=true |