Antenatal diagnosis of renal anomalies with ultrasound: III. Bilateral renal agenesis
Bilateral renal agenesis is a lethal congenital anomaly. A reliable prenatal diagnosis is extremely important, since it may offer options for pregnancy termination or may change obstetric management in the third trimester. This study examined the accuracy of ultrasound in making an antenatal diagnos...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | American journal of obstetrics and gynecology 1985-01, Vol.151 (1), p.38-43 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 43 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 38 |
container_title | American journal of obstetrics and gynecology |
container_volume | 151 |
creator | Romero, Roberto Cullen, Mark Grannum, Peter Jeanty, Philippe Reece, E.Albert Venus, Ingeborg Hobbins, John C. |
description | Bilateral renal agenesis is a lethal congenital anomaly. A reliable prenatal diagnosis is extremely important, since it may offer options for pregnancy termination or may change obstetric management in the third trimester. This study examined the accuracy of ultrasound in making an antenatal diagnosis of bilateral renal agenesis in three different populations: (1) patients with a family history of bilateral renal agenesis, (2) patients diagnosed during the course of a routine scan, and (3) patients referred because of a previous suspicious ultrasound examination in a level I ultrasound facility. In group A there were three true positive, 13 true negative, no false negative, and no false positive diagnoses. In group B there were three true positive and no false positive diagnoses. In group C there were 12 true positive, 17 true negative, one false negative, and no false positive diagnoses. The value and potential pitfall of the different diagnostic criteria are discussed. We conclude that ultrasound is a valuable tool in the detection of intrauterine renal failure, although there are limitations to a specific diagnosis of bilateral renal agenesis. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/0002-9378(85)90420-X |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_75934840</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>000293788590420X</els_id><sourcerecordid>75934840</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-e205t-5321c93875b95b164967a3e6d9f4e1bd6c3b39a51fef94f3a904336ff15f8cbc3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo9kUtLxDAUhYMo4zj6DxS6ENFFNY-mTVwI4-BjQHDjgLuQpjcayaSatIr_3o4WV5d7z8eBcy5ChwSfE0zKC4wxzSWrxKngZxIXFOfPW2hKsKzyUpRiG03_kV20l9LbZqWSTtCECUEwraZoNQ8dBN1pnzVOv4Q2uZS1NovD0Wc6tGvtHaTsy3WvWe-7qFPbh-YyWy6X59m187qDOJAj_wIBBod9tGO1T3Awzhla3d48Le7zh8e75WL-kAPFvMs5o8RIJipeS16TspBlpRmUjbQFkLopDauZ1JxYsLKwTA8pGSutJdwKUxs2Qyd_vu-x_eghdWrtkgHvdYC2T6rikhWiwAN4NIJ9vYZGvUe31vFbjT0M-vGo62S0t1EH49I_JgmnFacDdvWHwRDq00FUyTgIBhoXwXSqaZ0iWG3eozZlq033SnD1-x71zH4AYGmAog</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>75934840</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Antenatal diagnosis of renal anomalies with ultrasound: III. Bilateral renal agenesis</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Romero, Roberto ; Cullen, Mark ; Grannum, Peter ; Jeanty, Philippe ; Reece, E.Albert ; Venus, Ingeborg ; Hobbins, John C.</creator><creatorcontrib>Romero, Roberto ; Cullen, Mark ; Grannum, Peter ; Jeanty, Philippe ; Reece, E.Albert ; Venus, Ingeborg ; Hobbins, John C.</creatorcontrib><description>Bilateral renal agenesis is a lethal congenital anomaly. A reliable prenatal diagnosis is extremely important, since it may offer options for pregnancy termination or may change obstetric management in the third trimester. This study examined the accuracy of ultrasound in making an antenatal diagnosis of bilateral renal agenesis in three different populations: (1) patients with a family history of bilateral renal agenesis, (2) patients diagnosed during the course of a routine scan, and (3) patients referred because of a previous suspicious ultrasound examination in a level I ultrasound facility. In group A there were three true positive, 13 true negative, no false negative, and no false positive diagnoses. In group B there were three true positive and no false positive diagnoses. In group C there were 12 true positive, 17 true negative, one false negative, and no false positive diagnoses. The value and potential pitfall of the different diagnostic criteria are discussed. We conclude that ultrasound is a valuable tool in the detection of intrauterine renal failure, although there are limitations to a specific diagnosis of bilateral renal agenesis.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0002-9378</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1097-6868</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/0002-9378(85)90420-X</identifier><identifier>PMID: 3881027</identifier><identifier>CODEN: AJOGAH</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Philadelphia, PA: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>bilateral renal agenesis ; Biological and medical sciences ; Evaluation Studies as Topic ; Female ; Fetal Death ; Fetal Diseases - diagnosis ; Gestational Age ; Gynecology. Andrology. Obstetrics ; Humans ; Infant, Newborn ; Kidney Diseases - diagnosis ; Kidney Diseases - genetics ; Management. Prenatal diagnosis ; Medical sciences ; Pregnancy ; Pregnancy. Fetus. Placenta ; Prenatal Diagnosis - methods ; Renal anomalies ; Ultrasonography ; ultrasound</subject><ispartof>American journal of obstetrics and gynecology, 1985-01, Vol.151 (1), p.38-43</ispartof><rights>1985</rights><rights>1985 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/000293788590420X$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3536,4009,27902,27903,27904,65309</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=9152752$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/3881027$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Romero, Roberto</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cullen, Mark</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Grannum, Peter</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jeanty, Philippe</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Reece, E.Albert</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Venus, Ingeborg</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hobbins, John C.</creatorcontrib><title>Antenatal diagnosis of renal anomalies with ultrasound: III. Bilateral renal agenesis</title><title>American journal of obstetrics and gynecology</title><addtitle>Am J Obstet Gynecol</addtitle><description>Bilateral renal agenesis is a lethal congenital anomaly. A reliable prenatal diagnosis is extremely important, since it may offer options for pregnancy termination or may change obstetric management in the third trimester. This study examined the accuracy of ultrasound in making an antenatal diagnosis of bilateral renal agenesis in three different populations: (1) patients with a family history of bilateral renal agenesis, (2) patients diagnosed during the course of a routine scan, and (3) patients referred because of a previous suspicious ultrasound examination in a level I ultrasound facility. In group A there were three true positive, 13 true negative, no false negative, and no false positive diagnoses. In group B there were three true positive and no false positive diagnoses. In group C there were 12 true positive, 17 true negative, one false negative, and no false positive diagnoses. The value and potential pitfall of the different diagnostic criteria are discussed. We conclude that ultrasound is a valuable tool in the detection of intrauterine renal failure, although there are limitations to a specific diagnosis of bilateral renal agenesis.</description><subject>bilateral renal agenesis</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Evaluation Studies as Topic</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Fetal Death</subject><subject>Fetal Diseases - diagnosis</subject><subject>Gestational Age</subject><subject>Gynecology. Andrology. Obstetrics</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Infant, Newborn</subject><subject>Kidney Diseases - diagnosis</subject><subject>Kidney Diseases - genetics</subject><subject>Management. Prenatal diagnosis</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Pregnancy</subject><subject>Pregnancy. Fetus. Placenta</subject><subject>Prenatal Diagnosis - methods</subject><subject>Renal anomalies</subject><subject>Ultrasonography</subject><subject>ultrasound</subject><issn>0002-9378</issn><issn>1097-6868</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1985</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNo9kUtLxDAUhYMo4zj6DxS6ENFFNY-mTVwI4-BjQHDjgLuQpjcayaSatIr_3o4WV5d7z8eBcy5ChwSfE0zKC4wxzSWrxKngZxIXFOfPW2hKsKzyUpRiG03_kV20l9LbZqWSTtCECUEwraZoNQ8dBN1pnzVOv4Q2uZS1NovD0Wc6tGvtHaTsy3WvWe-7qFPbh-YyWy6X59m187qDOJAj_wIBBod9tGO1T3Awzhla3d48Le7zh8e75WL-kAPFvMs5o8RIJipeS16TspBlpRmUjbQFkLopDauZ1JxYsLKwTA8pGSutJdwKUxs2Qyd_vu-x_eghdWrtkgHvdYC2T6rikhWiwAN4NIJ9vYZGvUe31vFbjT0M-vGo62S0t1EH49I_JgmnFacDdvWHwRDq00FUyTgIBhoXwXSqaZ0iWG3eozZlq033SnD1-x71zH4AYGmAog</recordid><startdate>19850101</startdate><enddate>19850101</enddate><creator>Romero, Roberto</creator><creator>Cullen, Mark</creator><creator>Grannum, Peter</creator><creator>Jeanty, Philippe</creator><creator>Reece, E.Albert</creator><creator>Venus, Ingeborg</creator><creator>Hobbins, John C.</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><general>Elsevier</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19850101</creationdate><title>Antenatal diagnosis of renal anomalies with ultrasound: III. Bilateral renal agenesis</title><author>Romero, Roberto ; Cullen, Mark ; Grannum, Peter ; Jeanty, Philippe ; Reece, E.Albert ; Venus, Ingeborg ; Hobbins, John C.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-e205t-5321c93875b95b164967a3e6d9f4e1bd6c3b39a51fef94f3a904336ff15f8cbc3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1985</creationdate><topic>bilateral renal agenesis</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Evaluation Studies as Topic</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Fetal Death</topic><topic>Fetal Diseases - diagnosis</topic><topic>Gestational Age</topic><topic>Gynecology. Andrology. Obstetrics</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Infant, Newborn</topic><topic>Kidney Diseases - diagnosis</topic><topic>Kidney Diseases - genetics</topic><topic>Management. Prenatal diagnosis</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Pregnancy</topic><topic>Pregnancy. Fetus. Placenta</topic><topic>Prenatal Diagnosis - methods</topic><topic>Renal anomalies</topic><topic>Ultrasonography</topic><topic>ultrasound</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Romero, Roberto</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cullen, Mark</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Grannum, Peter</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jeanty, Philippe</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Reece, E.Albert</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Venus, Ingeborg</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hobbins, John C.</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>American journal of obstetrics and gynecology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Romero, Roberto</au><au>Cullen, Mark</au><au>Grannum, Peter</au><au>Jeanty, Philippe</au><au>Reece, E.Albert</au><au>Venus, Ingeborg</au><au>Hobbins, John C.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Antenatal diagnosis of renal anomalies with ultrasound: III. Bilateral renal agenesis</atitle><jtitle>American journal of obstetrics and gynecology</jtitle><addtitle>Am J Obstet Gynecol</addtitle><date>1985-01-01</date><risdate>1985</risdate><volume>151</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>38</spage><epage>43</epage><pages>38-43</pages><issn>0002-9378</issn><eissn>1097-6868</eissn><coden>AJOGAH</coden><abstract>Bilateral renal agenesis is a lethal congenital anomaly. A reliable prenatal diagnosis is extremely important, since it may offer options for pregnancy termination or may change obstetric management in the third trimester. This study examined the accuracy of ultrasound in making an antenatal diagnosis of bilateral renal agenesis in three different populations: (1) patients with a family history of bilateral renal agenesis, (2) patients diagnosed during the course of a routine scan, and (3) patients referred because of a previous suspicious ultrasound examination in a level I ultrasound facility. In group A there were three true positive, 13 true negative, no false negative, and no false positive diagnoses. In group B there were three true positive and no false positive diagnoses. In group C there were 12 true positive, 17 true negative, one false negative, and no false positive diagnoses. The value and potential pitfall of the different diagnostic criteria are discussed. We conclude that ultrasound is a valuable tool in the detection of intrauterine renal failure, although there are limitations to a specific diagnosis of bilateral renal agenesis.</abstract><cop>Philadelphia, PA</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>3881027</pmid><doi>10.1016/0002-9378(85)90420-X</doi><tpages>6</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0002-9378 |
ispartof | American journal of obstetrics and gynecology, 1985-01, Vol.151 (1), p.38-43 |
issn | 0002-9378 1097-6868 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_75934840 |
source | MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals |
subjects | bilateral renal agenesis Biological and medical sciences Evaluation Studies as Topic Female Fetal Death Fetal Diseases - diagnosis Gestational Age Gynecology. Andrology. Obstetrics Humans Infant, Newborn Kidney Diseases - diagnosis Kidney Diseases - genetics Management. Prenatal diagnosis Medical sciences Pregnancy Pregnancy. Fetus. Placenta Prenatal Diagnosis - methods Renal anomalies Ultrasonography ultrasound |
title | Antenatal diagnosis of renal anomalies with ultrasound: III. Bilateral renal agenesis |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-26T16%3A20%3A19IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Antenatal%20diagnosis%20of%20renal%20anomalies%20with%20ultrasound:%20III.%20Bilateral%20renal%20agenesis&rft.jtitle=American%20journal%20of%20obstetrics%20and%20gynecology&rft.au=Romero,%20Roberto&rft.date=1985-01-01&rft.volume=151&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=38&rft.epage=43&rft.pages=38-43&rft.issn=0002-9378&rft.eissn=1097-6868&rft.coden=AJOGAH&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/0002-9378(85)90420-X&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E75934840%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=75934840&rft_id=info:pmid/3881027&rft_els_id=000293788590420X&rfr_iscdi=true |