Comparative analysis of the germ cell markers c-KIT, SSEA-1 and VASA in testicular biopsies from secretory and obstructive azoospermias
Testicular biopsy is needed to confirm diagnosis in azoospermic patients and to recover spermatozoa, if possible. This report aims to quantitatively analyse the germline markers stage-specific embryonic antigen (SSEA-1), c-KIT and VASA in testicular biopsies with distinct azoospermic aetiologies. Tw...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Molecular human reproduction 2010-11, Vol.16 (11), p.811-817 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Testicular biopsy is needed to confirm diagnosis in azoospermic patients and to recover spermatozoa, if possible. This report aims to quantitatively analyse the germline markers stage-specific embryonic antigen (SSEA-1), c-KIT and VASA in testicular biopsies with distinct azoospermic aetiologies. Twenty-three testicular biopsies were analysed by flow cytometry and RT-qPCR for c-KIT, SSEA-1 and VASA. In all the Sertoli cell-only (SCO) samples, significantly lower VASA mRNA expression and fewer VASA+ cells were found compared with obstructive controls. Maturation arrest (MA) cases showed significant differences only with the non-mosaic SCO samples when compared for VASA mRNA expression and percentage of VASA+ cells, but not with the mosaics. However, the normalized VASA–KIT parameter obtained by subtracting the percentage of c-KIT+ cells from the percentage of VASA+ cells showed significant differences between the MA and all the SCO samples. RT-qPCR consistently found differences for the VASA expression between SCO mosaic and non-mosaic samples. However, by flow cytometry, only VASA–KIT showed significant differences between them. Conversely, the percentage of SSEA-1+ cells revealed no inter-group differences. In conclusion, testicular biopsies display different expression profiles for c-KIT and VASA depending on the azoospermic aetiology. These results can be used as a complementary tool to create new molecular categories for diagnoses in azoospermic patients, particularly useful to discriminate between mosaic and non-mosaic SCO patients. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1360-9947 1460-2407 |
DOI: | 10.1093/molehr/gaq044 |