Application of statistical modeling to optimize a coastal water quality monitoring program
The long-term water quality monitoring program implemented by the Massachusetts Water Resources Authority in 1992 is extensive and has provide substantial understanding of the seasonality of the waters in both Boston Harbor and Massachusetts Bay and the response to improvements in effluent quality a...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Environmental monitoring and assessment 2008-02, Vol.137 (1-3), p.505-522 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 522 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1-3 |
container_start_page | 505 |
container_title | Environmental monitoring and assessment |
container_volume | 137 |
creator | Hunt, Carlton D Rust, Steven W Sinnott, Lorraine |
description | The long-term water quality monitoring program implemented by the Massachusetts Water Resources Authority in 1992 is extensive and has provide substantial understanding of the seasonality of the waters in both Boston Harbor and Massachusetts Bay and the response to improvements in effluent quality and offshore transfer of the effluent in September 2000. The monitoring program was designed with limited knowledge of spatial and temporal variability and long-term trends within the system. This led to an extensive spatial and temporal sampling program. The data through 2003 showed high correlation within physical parameters measured (e.g., salinity, dissolved oxygen) and in biological measures such as chlorophyll fluorescence. To address the potential sampling redundancies in the measurement program, an assessment of the impact of reduced levels of monitoring on the ability to make water quality decisions was completed. The optimization was conducted by applying statistical models that took into account whether there was evidence of a seasonal pattern in the data. The optimization used model survey average readings to identify temporal fixed effects, model survey-average-corrected individual station readings to identify spatial fixed effects, corrected the individual station readings for temporal and spatial fixed effects and derived a correlation model for the corrected data, and applied the correlation model to characterize the correlation of annual average readings from reduced monitoring programs with true parameter levels. Reductions in the number of sampling stations were found less detrimental to the quality of the data for annual decision-making than reductions in the number of surveys per year, although there is less of a difference in this regard for dissolved oxygen than there is for chlorophyll. The analysis led to recommendations for a substantially lower monitoring effort with minimal loss of information. The recommendation supported an annual budget savings of approximately $183,000. Most of the savings was from fewer surveys as approximately $21,000 came from the reduction in the number of stations monitored from 21 to 7 and associated laboratory analytical costs. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s10661-007-9785-0 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_759320214</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>759320214</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c646t-6404c74c6561e60bfe18ddba279f9996610021bb32d67f0db12facc1338cf7893</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkstu1DAUhiMEotPCA7CBCKnAJnB8t5dVxU2qxAK6YRM5jjNylcSpnQiVp-eEGWkkFjOsfGR95z-3vyheEHhPANSHTEBKUmFYGaVFBY-KDRGKVdQI87jYAJGqkkyas-I85zsAMIqbp8UZUUJSCmJT_Lyapj44O4c4lrEr84xhnvGnL4fY-j6M23KOZZzmMITfvrSlixapvvxlZ5_K-8X2YX5AeAxzTCs-pbhNdnhWPOlsn_3z_XtR3H76-OP6S3Xz7fPX66ubykku50py4E5xJ4UkXkLTeaLbtrFUmc4YgwMCUNI0jLZSddA2hHbWOcKYdp3Shl0Ub3e6WPd-8Xmuh5Cd73s7-rjkWgnDKErw_yKJFlIg-eYoSQlVbF31SRA07lytiu-OgkQphTMJoU-jUhGquaTsZHnCNePy7-iv_wHv4pJGvEtN0QlghJQIkR3kUsw5-a6eUhhseqgJ1Kvj6p3j6jVcHVcD5rzcCy_N4NtDxt5iCFzuAZvRVV2yowv5wOGNFWMUObrj8rS6yKdDh8eqv9oldTbWdptQ-PY7BcIANOccl_kHcuT0lg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>222009566</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Application of statistical modeling to optimize a coastal water quality monitoring program</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings</source><creator>Hunt, Carlton D ; Rust, Steven W ; Sinnott, Lorraine</creator><creatorcontrib>Hunt, Carlton D ; Rust, Steven W ; Sinnott, Lorraine</creatorcontrib><description>The long-term water quality monitoring program implemented by the Massachusetts Water Resources Authority in 1992 is extensive and has provide substantial understanding of the seasonality of the waters in both Boston Harbor and Massachusetts Bay and the response to improvements in effluent quality and offshore transfer of the effluent in September 2000. The monitoring program was designed with limited knowledge of spatial and temporal variability and long-term trends within the system. This led to an extensive spatial and temporal sampling program. The data through 2003 showed high correlation within physical parameters measured (e.g., salinity, dissolved oxygen) and in biological measures such as chlorophyll fluorescence. To address the potential sampling redundancies in the measurement program, an assessment of the impact of reduced levels of monitoring on the ability to make water quality decisions was completed. The optimization was conducted by applying statistical models that took into account whether there was evidence of a seasonal pattern in the data. The optimization used model survey average readings to identify temporal fixed effects, model survey-average-corrected individual station readings to identify spatial fixed effects, corrected the individual station readings for temporal and spatial fixed effects and derived a correlation model for the corrected data, and applied the correlation model to characterize the correlation of annual average readings from reduced monitoring programs with true parameter levels. Reductions in the number of sampling stations were found less detrimental to the quality of the data for annual decision-making than reductions in the number of surveys per year, although there is less of a difference in this regard for dissolved oxygen than there is for chlorophyll. The analysis led to recommendations for a substantially lower monitoring effort with minimal loss of information. The recommendation supported an annual budget savings of approximately $183,000. Most of the savings was from fewer surveys as approximately $21,000 came from the reduction in the number of stations monitored from 21 to 7 and associated laboratory analytical costs.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0167-6369</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1573-2959</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s10661-007-9785-0</identifier><identifier>PMID: 17562205</identifier><identifier>CODEN: EMASDH</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Dordrecht: Dordrecht : Springer Netherlands</publisher><subject>Analysis methods ; Applied sciences ; Atmospheric Protection/Air Quality Control/Air Pollution ; Chlorophyll ; Chlorophyll - analysis ; Coastal waters ; Coasts ; Correlation ; Dissolved oxygen ; Earth and Environmental Science ; Earth sciences ; Earth, ocean, space ; Ecology ; Ecotoxicology ; Effluents ; Engineering and environment geology. Geothermics ; Environment ; Environmental Management ; Environmental monitoring ; Environmental Monitoring - statistics & numerical data ; Environmental protection ; Exact sciences and technology ; Harbors ; Marine ; Massachusetts ; Massachusetts bay ; Mathematical models ; Models, Statistical ; Monitoring ; Monitoring program optimization ; Monitoring/Environmental Analysis ; Natural water pollution ; Offshore ; Optimization ; Polls & surveys ; Pollution ; Pollution, environment geology ; Reduction ; Salinity ; Sampling ; Seasonal variations ; Seasons ; Seawaters, estuaries ; Stations ; Statistical methods ; Statistical models ; Studies ; Temporal logic ; Water monitoring ; Water Pollution - analysis ; Water quality ; Water quality management ; Water quality monitoring ; Water resources ; Water treatment and pollution</subject><ispartof>Environmental monitoring and assessment, 2008-02, Vol.137 (1-3), p.505-522</ispartof><rights>Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2007</rights><rights>2008 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2008</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c646t-6404c74c6561e60bfe18ddba279f9996610021bb32d67f0db12facc1338cf7893</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c646t-6404c74c6561e60bfe18ddba279f9996610021bb32d67f0db12facc1338cf7893</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10661-007-9785-0$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10661-007-9785-0$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902,41464,42533,51294</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=19997332$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17562205$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Hunt, Carlton D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rust, Steven W</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sinnott, Lorraine</creatorcontrib><title>Application of statistical modeling to optimize a coastal water quality monitoring program</title><title>Environmental monitoring and assessment</title><addtitle>Environ Monit Assess</addtitle><addtitle>Environ Monit Assess</addtitle><description>The long-term water quality monitoring program implemented by the Massachusetts Water Resources Authority in 1992 is extensive and has provide substantial understanding of the seasonality of the waters in both Boston Harbor and Massachusetts Bay and the response to improvements in effluent quality and offshore transfer of the effluent in September 2000. The monitoring program was designed with limited knowledge of spatial and temporal variability and long-term trends within the system. This led to an extensive spatial and temporal sampling program. The data through 2003 showed high correlation within physical parameters measured (e.g., salinity, dissolved oxygen) and in biological measures such as chlorophyll fluorescence. To address the potential sampling redundancies in the measurement program, an assessment of the impact of reduced levels of monitoring on the ability to make water quality decisions was completed. The optimization was conducted by applying statistical models that took into account whether there was evidence of a seasonal pattern in the data. The optimization used model survey average readings to identify temporal fixed effects, model survey-average-corrected individual station readings to identify spatial fixed effects, corrected the individual station readings for temporal and spatial fixed effects and derived a correlation model for the corrected data, and applied the correlation model to characterize the correlation of annual average readings from reduced monitoring programs with true parameter levels. Reductions in the number of sampling stations were found less detrimental to the quality of the data for annual decision-making than reductions in the number of surveys per year, although there is less of a difference in this regard for dissolved oxygen than there is for chlorophyll. The analysis led to recommendations for a substantially lower monitoring effort with minimal loss of information. The recommendation supported an annual budget savings of approximately $183,000. Most of the savings was from fewer surveys as approximately $21,000 came from the reduction in the number of stations monitored from 21 to 7 and associated laboratory analytical costs.</description><subject>Analysis methods</subject><subject>Applied sciences</subject><subject>Atmospheric Protection/Air Quality Control/Air Pollution</subject><subject>Chlorophyll</subject><subject>Chlorophyll - analysis</subject><subject>Coastal waters</subject><subject>Coasts</subject><subject>Correlation</subject><subject>Dissolved oxygen</subject><subject>Earth and Environmental Science</subject><subject>Earth sciences</subject><subject>Earth, ocean, space</subject><subject>Ecology</subject><subject>Ecotoxicology</subject><subject>Effluents</subject><subject>Engineering and environment geology. Geothermics</subject><subject>Environment</subject><subject>Environmental Management</subject><subject>Environmental monitoring</subject><subject>Environmental Monitoring - statistics & numerical data</subject><subject>Environmental protection</subject><subject>Exact sciences and technology</subject><subject>Harbors</subject><subject>Marine</subject><subject>Massachusetts</subject><subject>Massachusetts bay</subject><subject>Mathematical models</subject><subject>Models, Statistical</subject><subject>Monitoring</subject><subject>Monitoring program optimization</subject><subject>Monitoring/Environmental Analysis</subject><subject>Natural water pollution</subject><subject>Offshore</subject><subject>Optimization</subject><subject>Polls & surveys</subject><subject>Pollution</subject><subject>Pollution, environment geology</subject><subject>Reduction</subject><subject>Salinity</subject><subject>Sampling</subject><subject>Seasonal variations</subject><subject>Seasons</subject><subject>Seawaters, estuaries</subject><subject>Stations</subject><subject>Statistical methods</subject><subject>Statistical models</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Temporal logic</subject><subject>Water monitoring</subject><subject>Water Pollution - analysis</subject><subject>Water quality</subject><subject>Water quality management</subject><subject>Water quality monitoring</subject><subject>Water resources</subject><subject>Water treatment and pollution</subject><issn>0167-6369</issn><issn>1573-2959</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2008</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkstu1DAUhiMEotPCA7CBCKnAJnB8t5dVxU2qxAK6YRM5jjNylcSpnQiVp-eEGWkkFjOsfGR95z-3vyheEHhPANSHTEBKUmFYGaVFBY-KDRGKVdQI87jYAJGqkkyas-I85zsAMIqbp8UZUUJSCmJT_Lyapj44O4c4lrEr84xhnvGnL4fY-j6M23KOZZzmMITfvrSlixapvvxlZ5_K-8X2YX5AeAxzTCs-pbhNdnhWPOlsn_3z_XtR3H76-OP6S3Xz7fPX66ubykku50py4E5xJ4UkXkLTeaLbtrFUmc4YgwMCUNI0jLZSddA2hHbWOcKYdp3Shl0Ub3e6WPd-8Xmuh5Cd73s7-rjkWgnDKErw_yKJFlIg-eYoSQlVbF31SRA07lytiu-OgkQphTMJoU-jUhGquaTsZHnCNePy7-iv_wHv4pJGvEtN0QlghJQIkR3kUsw5-a6eUhhseqgJ1Kvj6p3j6jVcHVcD5rzcCy_N4NtDxt5iCFzuAZvRVV2yowv5wOGNFWMUObrj8rS6yKdDh8eqv9oldTbWdptQ-PY7BcIANOccl_kHcuT0lg</recordid><startdate>20080201</startdate><enddate>20080201</enddate><creator>Hunt, Carlton D</creator><creator>Rust, Steven W</creator><creator>Sinnott, Lorraine</creator><general>Dordrecht : Springer Netherlands</general><general>Springer Netherlands</general><general>Springer</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>FBQ</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QH</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7TN</scope><scope>7U7</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>87Z</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H97</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>SOI</scope><scope>7SU</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>7TV</scope><scope>7U6</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20080201</creationdate><title>Application of statistical modeling to optimize a coastal water quality monitoring program</title><author>Hunt, Carlton D ; Rust, Steven W ; Sinnott, Lorraine</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c646t-6404c74c6561e60bfe18ddba279f9996610021bb32d67f0db12facc1338cf7893</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2008</creationdate><topic>Analysis methods</topic><topic>Applied sciences</topic><topic>Atmospheric Protection/Air Quality Control/Air Pollution</topic><topic>Chlorophyll</topic><topic>Chlorophyll - analysis</topic><topic>Coastal waters</topic><topic>Coasts</topic><topic>Correlation</topic><topic>Dissolved oxygen</topic><topic>Earth and Environmental Science</topic><topic>Earth sciences</topic><topic>Earth, ocean, space</topic><topic>Ecology</topic><topic>Ecotoxicology</topic><topic>Effluents</topic><topic>Engineering and environment geology. Geothermics</topic><topic>Environment</topic><topic>Environmental Management</topic><topic>Environmental monitoring</topic><topic>Environmental Monitoring - statistics & numerical data</topic><topic>Environmental protection</topic><topic>Exact sciences and technology</topic><topic>Harbors</topic><topic>Marine</topic><topic>Massachusetts</topic><topic>Massachusetts bay</topic><topic>Mathematical models</topic><topic>Models, Statistical</topic><topic>Monitoring</topic><topic>Monitoring program optimization</topic><topic>Monitoring/Environmental Analysis</topic><topic>Natural water pollution</topic><topic>Offshore</topic><topic>Optimization</topic><topic>Polls & surveys</topic><topic>Pollution</topic><topic>Pollution, environment geology</topic><topic>Reduction</topic><topic>Salinity</topic><topic>Sampling</topic><topic>Seasonal variations</topic><topic>Seasons</topic><topic>Seawaters, estuaries</topic><topic>Stations</topic><topic>Statistical methods</topic><topic>Statistical models</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Temporal logic</topic><topic>Water monitoring</topic><topic>Water Pollution - analysis</topic><topic>Water quality</topic><topic>Water quality management</topic><topic>Water quality monitoring</topic><topic>Water resources</topic><topic>Water treatment and pollution</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Hunt, Carlton D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rust, Steven W</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sinnott, Lorraine</creatorcontrib><collection>AGRIS</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Aqualine</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Oceanic Abstracts</collection><collection>Toxicology Abstracts</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 3: Aquatic Pollution & Environmental Quality</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Pollution Abstracts</collection><collection>Sustainability Science Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Environmental monitoring and assessment</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Hunt, Carlton D</au><au>Rust, Steven W</au><au>Sinnott, Lorraine</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Application of statistical modeling to optimize a coastal water quality monitoring program</atitle><jtitle>Environmental monitoring and assessment</jtitle><stitle>Environ Monit Assess</stitle><addtitle>Environ Monit Assess</addtitle><date>2008-02-01</date><risdate>2008</risdate><volume>137</volume><issue>1-3</issue><spage>505</spage><epage>522</epage><pages>505-522</pages><issn>0167-6369</issn><eissn>1573-2959</eissn><coden>EMASDH</coden><abstract>The long-term water quality monitoring program implemented by the Massachusetts Water Resources Authority in 1992 is extensive and has provide substantial understanding of the seasonality of the waters in both Boston Harbor and Massachusetts Bay and the response to improvements in effluent quality and offshore transfer of the effluent in September 2000. The monitoring program was designed with limited knowledge of spatial and temporal variability and long-term trends within the system. This led to an extensive spatial and temporal sampling program. The data through 2003 showed high correlation within physical parameters measured (e.g., salinity, dissolved oxygen) and in biological measures such as chlorophyll fluorescence. To address the potential sampling redundancies in the measurement program, an assessment of the impact of reduced levels of monitoring on the ability to make water quality decisions was completed. The optimization was conducted by applying statistical models that took into account whether there was evidence of a seasonal pattern in the data. The optimization used model survey average readings to identify temporal fixed effects, model survey-average-corrected individual station readings to identify spatial fixed effects, corrected the individual station readings for temporal and spatial fixed effects and derived a correlation model for the corrected data, and applied the correlation model to characterize the correlation of annual average readings from reduced monitoring programs with true parameter levels. Reductions in the number of sampling stations were found less detrimental to the quality of the data for annual decision-making than reductions in the number of surveys per year, although there is less of a difference in this regard for dissolved oxygen than there is for chlorophyll. The analysis led to recommendations for a substantially lower monitoring effort with minimal loss of information. The recommendation supported an annual budget savings of approximately $183,000. Most of the savings was from fewer surveys as approximately $21,000 came from the reduction in the number of stations monitored from 21 to 7 and associated laboratory analytical costs.</abstract><cop>Dordrecht</cop><pub>Dordrecht : Springer Netherlands</pub><pmid>17562205</pmid><doi>10.1007/s10661-007-9785-0</doi><tpages>18</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0167-6369 |
ispartof | Environmental monitoring and assessment, 2008-02, Vol.137 (1-3), p.505-522 |
issn | 0167-6369 1573-2959 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_759320214 |
source | MEDLINE; SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings |
subjects | Analysis methods Applied sciences Atmospheric Protection/Air Quality Control/Air Pollution Chlorophyll Chlorophyll - analysis Coastal waters Coasts Correlation Dissolved oxygen Earth and Environmental Science Earth sciences Earth, ocean, space Ecology Ecotoxicology Effluents Engineering and environment geology. Geothermics Environment Environmental Management Environmental monitoring Environmental Monitoring - statistics & numerical data Environmental protection Exact sciences and technology Harbors Marine Massachusetts Massachusetts bay Mathematical models Models, Statistical Monitoring Monitoring program optimization Monitoring/Environmental Analysis Natural water pollution Offshore Optimization Polls & surveys Pollution Pollution, environment geology Reduction Salinity Sampling Seasonal variations Seasons Seawaters, estuaries Stations Statistical methods Statistical models Studies Temporal logic Water monitoring Water Pollution - analysis Water quality Water quality management Water quality monitoring Water resources Water treatment and pollution |
title | Application of statistical modeling to optimize a coastal water quality monitoring program |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-06T15%3A58%3A44IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Application%20of%20statistical%20modeling%20to%20optimize%20a%20coastal%20water%20quality%20monitoring%20program&rft.jtitle=Environmental%20monitoring%20and%20assessment&rft.au=Hunt,%20Carlton%20D&rft.date=2008-02-01&rft.volume=137&rft.issue=1-3&rft.spage=505&rft.epage=522&rft.pages=505-522&rft.issn=0167-6369&rft.eissn=1573-2959&rft.coden=EMASDH&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s10661-007-9785-0&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E759320214%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=222009566&rft_id=info:pmid/17562205&rfr_iscdi=true |