Application of statistical modeling to optimize a coastal water quality monitoring program

The long-term water quality monitoring program implemented by the Massachusetts Water Resources Authority in 1992 is extensive and has provide substantial understanding of the seasonality of the waters in both Boston Harbor and Massachusetts Bay and the response to improvements in effluent quality a...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Environmental monitoring and assessment 2008-02, Vol.137 (1-3), p.505-522
Hauptverfasser: Hunt, Carlton D, Rust, Steven W, Sinnott, Lorraine
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 522
container_issue 1-3
container_start_page 505
container_title Environmental monitoring and assessment
container_volume 137
creator Hunt, Carlton D
Rust, Steven W
Sinnott, Lorraine
description The long-term water quality monitoring program implemented by the Massachusetts Water Resources Authority in 1992 is extensive and has provide substantial understanding of the seasonality of the waters in both Boston Harbor and Massachusetts Bay and the response to improvements in effluent quality and offshore transfer of the effluent in September 2000. The monitoring program was designed with limited knowledge of spatial and temporal variability and long-term trends within the system. This led to an extensive spatial and temporal sampling program. The data through 2003 showed high correlation within physical parameters measured (e.g., salinity, dissolved oxygen) and in biological measures such as chlorophyll fluorescence. To address the potential sampling redundancies in the measurement program, an assessment of the impact of reduced levels of monitoring on the ability to make water quality decisions was completed. The optimization was conducted by applying statistical models that took into account whether there was evidence of a seasonal pattern in the data. The optimization used model survey average readings to identify temporal fixed effects, model survey-average-corrected individual station readings to identify spatial fixed effects, corrected the individual station readings for temporal and spatial fixed effects and derived a correlation model for the corrected data, and applied the correlation model to characterize the correlation of annual average readings from reduced monitoring programs with true parameter levels. Reductions in the number of sampling stations were found less detrimental to the quality of the data for annual decision-making than reductions in the number of surveys per year, although there is less of a difference in this regard for dissolved oxygen than there is for chlorophyll. The analysis led to recommendations for a substantially lower monitoring effort with minimal loss of information. The recommendation supported an annual budget savings of approximately $183,000. Most of the savings was from fewer surveys as approximately $21,000 came from the reduction in the number of stations monitored from 21 to 7 and associated laboratory analytical costs.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s10661-007-9785-0
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_759320214</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>759320214</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c646t-6404c74c6561e60bfe18ddba279f9996610021bb32d67f0db12facc1338cf7893</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkstu1DAUhiMEotPCA7CBCKnAJnB8t5dVxU2qxAK6YRM5jjNylcSpnQiVp-eEGWkkFjOsfGR95z-3vyheEHhPANSHTEBKUmFYGaVFBY-KDRGKVdQI87jYAJGqkkyas-I85zsAMIqbp8UZUUJSCmJT_Lyapj44O4c4lrEr84xhnvGnL4fY-j6M23KOZZzmMITfvrSlixapvvxlZ5_K-8X2YX5AeAxzTCs-pbhNdnhWPOlsn_3z_XtR3H76-OP6S3Xz7fPX66ubykku50py4E5xJ4UkXkLTeaLbtrFUmc4YgwMCUNI0jLZSddA2hHbWOcKYdp3Shl0Ub3e6WPd-8Xmuh5Cd73s7-rjkWgnDKErw_yKJFlIg-eYoSQlVbF31SRA07lytiu-OgkQphTMJoU-jUhGquaTsZHnCNePy7-iv_wHv4pJGvEtN0QlghJQIkR3kUsw5-a6eUhhseqgJ1Kvj6p3j6jVcHVcD5rzcCy_N4NtDxt5iCFzuAZvRVV2yowv5wOGNFWMUObrj8rS6yKdDh8eqv9oldTbWdptQ-PY7BcIANOccl_kHcuT0lg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>222009566</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Application of statistical modeling to optimize a coastal water quality monitoring program</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings</source><creator>Hunt, Carlton D ; Rust, Steven W ; Sinnott, Lorraine</creator><creatorcontrib>Hunt, Carlton D ; Rust, Steven W ; Sinnott, Lorraine</creatorcontrib><description>The long-term water quality monitoring program implemented by the Massachusetts Water Resources Authority in 1992 is extensive and has provide substantial understanding of the seasonality of the waters in both Boston Harbor and Massachusetts Bay and the response to improvements in effluent quality and offshore transfer of the effluent in September 2000. The monitoring program was designed with limited knowledge of spatial and temporal variability and long-term trends within the system. This led to an extensive spatial and temporal sampling program. The data through 2003 showed high correlation within physical parameters measured (e.g., salinity, dissolved oxygen) and in biological measures such as chlorophyll fluorescence. To address the potential sampling redundancies in the measurement program, an assessment of the impact of reduced levels of monitoring on the ability to make water quality decisions was completed. The optimization was conducted by applying statistical models that took into account whether there was evidence of a seasonal pattern in the data. The optimization used model survey average readings to identify temporal fixed effects, model survey-average-corrected individual station readings to identify spatial fixed effects, corrected the individual station readings for temporal and spatial fixed effects and derived a correlation model for the corrected data, and applied the correlation model to characterize the correlation of annual average readings from reduced monitoring programs with true parameter levels. Reductions in the number of sampling stations were found less detrimental to the quality of the data for annual decision-making than reductions in the number of surveys per year, although there is less of a difference in this regard for dissolved oxygen than there is for chlorophyll. The analysis led to recommendations for a substantially lower monitoring effort with minimal loss of information. The recommendation supported an annual budget savings of approximately $183,000. Most of the savings was from fewer surveys as approximately $21,000 came from the reduction in the number of stations monitored from 21 to 7 and associated laboratory analytical costs.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0167-6369</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1573-2959</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s10661-007-9785-0</identifier><identifier>PMID: 17562205</identifier><identifier>CODEN: EMASDH</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Dordrecht: Dordrecht : Springer Netherlands</publisher><subject>Analysis methods ; Applied sciences ; Atmospheric Protection/Air Quality Control/Air Pollution ; Chlorophyll ; Chlorophyll - analysis ; Coastal waters ; Coasts ; Correlation ; Dissolved oxygen ; Earth and Environmental Science ; Earth sciences ; Earth, ocean, space ; Ecology ; Ecotoxicology ; Effluents ; Engineering and environment geology. Geothermics ; Environment ; Environmental Management ; Environmental monitoring ; Environmental Monitoring - statistics &amp; numerical data ; Environmental protection ; Exact sciences and technology ; Harbors ; Marine ; Massachusetts ; Massachusetts bay ; Mathematical models ; Models, Statistical ; Monitoring ; Monitoring program optimization ; Monitoring/Environmental Analysis ; Natural water pollution ; Offshore ; Optimization ; Polls &amp; surveys ; Pollution ; Pollution, environment geology ; Reduction ; Salinity ; Sampling ; Seasonal variations ; Seasons ; Seawaters, estuaries ; Stations ; Statistical methods ; Statistical models ; Studies ; Temporal logic ; Water monitoring ; Water Pollution - analysis ; Water quality ; Water quality management ; Water quality monitoring ; Water resources ; Water treatment and pollution</subject><ispartof>Environmental monitoring and assessment, 2008-02, Vol.137 (1-3), p.505-522</ispartof><rights>Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2007</rights><rights>2008 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2008</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c646t-6404c74c6561e60bfe18ddba279f9996610021bb32d67f0db12facc1338cf7893</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c646t-6404c74c6561e60bfe18ddba279f9996610021bb32d67f0db12facc1338cf7893</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10661-007-9785-0$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10661-007-9785-0$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902,41464,42533,51294</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=19997332$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17562205$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Hunt, Carlton D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rust, Steven W</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sinnott, Lorraine</creatorcontrib><title>Application of statistical modeling to optimize a coastal water quality monitoring program</title><title>Environmental monitoring and assessment</title><addtitle>Environ Monit Assess</addtitle><addtitle>Environ Monit Assess</addtitle><description>The long-term water quality monitoring program implemented by the Massachusetts Water Resources Authority in 1992 is extensive and has provide substantial understanding of the seasonality of the waters in both Boston Harbor and Massachusetts Bay and the response to improvements in effluent quality and offshore transfer of the effluent in September 2000. The monitoring program was designed with limited knowledge of spatial and temporal variability and long-term trends within the system. This led to an extensive spatial and temporal sampling program. The data through 2003 showed high correlation within physical parameters measured (e.g., salinity, dissolved oxygen) and in biological measures such as chlorophyll fluorescence. To address the potential sampling redundancies in the measurement program, an assessment of the impact of reduced levels of monitoring on the ability to make water quality decisions was completed. The optimization was conducted by applying statistical models that took into account whether there was evidence of a seasonal pattern in the data. The optimization used model survey average readings to identify temporal fixed effects, model survey-average-corrected individual station readings to identify spatial fixed effects, corrected the individual station readings for temporal and spatial fixed effects and derived a correlation model for the corrected data, and applied the correlation model to characterize the correlation of annual average readings from reduced monitoring programs with true parameter levels. Reductions in the number of sampling stations were found less detrimental to the quality of the data for annual decision-making than reductions in the number of surveys per year, although there is less of a difference in this regard for dissolved oxygen than there is for chlorophyll. The analysis led to recommendations for a substantially lower monitoring effort with minimal loss of information. The recommendation supported an annual budget savings of approximately $183,000. Most of the savings was from fewer surveys as approximately $21,000 came from the reduction in the number of stations monitored from 21 to 7 and associated laboratory analytical costs.</description><subject>Analysis methods</subject><subject>Applied sciences</subject><subject>Atmospheric Protection/Air Quality Control/Air Pollution</subject><subject>Chlorophyll</subject><subject>Chlorophyll - analysis</subject><subject>Coastal waters</subject><subject>Coasts</subject><subject>Correlation</subject><subject>Dissolved oxygen</subject><subject>Earth and Environmental Science</subject><subject>Earth sciences</subject><subject>Earth, ocean, space</subject><subject>Ecology</subject><subject>Ecotoxicology</subject><subject>Effluents</subject><subject>Engineering and environment geology. Geothermics</subject><subject>Environment</subject><subject>Environmental Management</subject><subject>Environmental monitoring</subject><subject>Environmental Monitoring - statistics &amp; numerical data</subject><subject>Environmental protection</subject><subject>Exact sciences and technology</subject><subject>Harbors</subject><subject>Marine</subject><subject>Massachusetts</subject><subject>Massachusetts bay</subject><subject>Mathematical models</subject><subject>Models, Statistical</subject><subject>Monitoring</subject><subject>Monitoring program optimization</subject><subject>Monitoring/Environmental Analysis</subject><subject>Natural water pollution</subject><subject>Offshore</subject><subject>Optimization</subject><subject>Polls &amp; surveys</subject><subject>Pollution</subject><subject>Pollution, environment geology</subject><subject>Reduction</subject><subject>Salinity</subject><subject>Sampling</subject><subject>Seasonal variations</subject><subject>Seasons</subject><subject>Seawaters, estuaries</subject><subject>Stations</subject><subject>Statistical methods</subject><subject>Statistical models</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Temporal logic</subject><subject>Water monitoring</subject><subject>Water Pollution - analysis</subject><subject>Water quality</subject><subject>Water quality management</subject><subject>Water quality monitoring</subject><subject>Water resources</subject><subject>Water treatment and pollution</subject><issn>0167-6369</issn><issn>1573-2959</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2008</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkstu1DAUhiMEotPCA7CBCKnAJnB8t5dVxU2qxAK6YRM5jjNylcSpnQiVp-eEGWkkFjOsfGR95z-3vyheEHhPANSHTEBKUmFYGaVFBY-KDRGKVdQI87jYAJGqkkyas-I85zsAMIqbp8UZUUJSCmJT_Lyapj44O4c4lrEr84xhnvGnL4fY-j6M23KOZZzmMITfvrSlixapvvxlZ5_K-8X2YX5AeAxzTCs-pbhNdnhWPOlsn_3z_XtR3H76-OP6S3Xz7fPX66ubykku50py4E5xJ4UkXkLTeaLbtrFUmc4YgwMCUNI0jLZSddA2hHbWOcKYdp3Shl0Ub3e6WPd-8Xmuh5Cd73s7-rjkWgnDKErw_yKJFlIg-eYoSQlVbF31SRA07lytiu-OgkQphTMJoU-jUhGquaTsZHnCNePy7-iv_wHv4pJGvEtN0QlghJQIkR3kUsw5-a6eUhhseqgJ1Kvj6p3j6jVcHVcD5rzcCy_N4NtDxt5iCFzuAZvRVV2yowv5wOGNFWMUObrj8rS6yKdDh8eqv9oldTbWdptQ-PY7BcIANOccl_kHcuT0lg</recordid><startdate>20080201</startdate><enddate>20080201</enddate><creator>Hunt, Carlton D</creator><creator>Rust, Steven W</creator><creator>Sinnott, Lorraine</creator><general>Dordrecht : Springer Netherlands</general><general>Springer Netherlands</general><general>Springer</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>FBQ</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QH</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7TN</scope><scope>7U7</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>87Z</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H97</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>SOI</scope><scope>7SU</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>7TV</scope><scope>7U6</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20080201</creationdate><title>Application of statistical modeling to optimize a coastal water quality monitoring program</title><author>Hunt, Carlton D ; Rust, Steven W ; Sinnott, Lorraine</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c646t-6404c74c6561e60bfe18ddba279f9996610021bb32d67f0db12facc1338cf7893</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2008</creationdate><topic>Analysis methods</topic><topic>Applied sciences</topic><topic>Atmospheric Protection/Air Quality Control/Air Pollution</topic><topic>Chlorophyll</topic><topic>Chlorophyll - analysis</topic><topic>Coastal waters</topic><topic>Coasts</topic><topic>Correlation</topic><topic>Dissolved oxygen</topic><topic>Earth and Environmental Science</topic><topic>Earth sciences</topic><topic>Earth, ocean, space</topic><topic>Ecology</topic><topic>Ecotoxicology</topic><topic>Effluents</topic><topic>Engineering and environment geology. Geothermics</topic><topic>Environment</topic><topic>Environmental Management</topic><topic>Environmental monitoring</topic><topic>Environmental Monitoring - statistics &amp; numerical data</topic><topic>Environmental protection</topic><topic>Exact sciences and technology</topic><topic>Harbors</topic><topic>Marine</topic><topic>Massachusetts</topic><topic>Massachusetts bay</topic><topic>Mathematical models</topic><topic>Models, Statistical</topic><topic>Monitoring</topic><topic>Monitoring program optimization</topic><topic>Monitoring/Environmental Analysis</topic><topic>Natural water pollution</topic><topic>Offshore</topic><topic>Optimization</topic><topic>Polls &amp; surveys</topic><topic>Pollution</topic><topic>Pollution, environment geology</topic><topic>Reduction</topic><topic>Salinity</topic><topic>Sampling</topic><topic>Seasonal variations</topic><topic>Seasons</topic><topic>Seawaters, estuaries</topic><topic>Stations</topic><topic>Statistical methods</topic><topic>Statistical models</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Temporal logic</topic><topic>Water monitoring</topic><topic>Water Pollution - analysis</topic><topic>Water quality</topic><topic>Water quality management</topic><topic>Water quality monitoring</topic><topic>Water resources</topic><topic>Water treatment and pollution</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Hunt, Carlton D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rust, Steven W</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sinnott, Lorraine</creatorcontrib><collection>AGRIS</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Aqualine</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Oceanic Abstracts</collection><collection>Toxicology Abstracts</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Agricultural &amp; Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 3: Aquatic Pollution &amp; Environmental Quality</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Pollution Abstracts</collection><collection>Sustainability Science Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Environmental monitoring and assessment</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Hunt, Carlton D</au><au>Rust, Steven W</au><au>Sinnott, Lorraine</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Application of statistical modeling to optimize a coastal water quality monitoring program</atitle><jtitle>Environmental monitoring and assessment</jtitle><stitle>Environ Monit Assess</stitle><addtitle>Environ Monit Assess</addtitle><date>2008-02-01</date><risdate>2008</risdate><volume>137</volume><issue>1-3</issue><spage>505</spage><epage>522</epage><pages>505-522</pages><issn>0167-6369</issn><eissn>1573-2959</eissn><coden>EMASDH</coden><abstract>The long-term water quality monitoring program implemented by the Massachusetts Water Resources Authority in 1992 is extensive and has provide substantial understanding of the seasonality of the waters in both Boston Harbor and Massachusetts Bay and the response to improvements in effluent quality and offshore transfer of the effluent in September 2000. The monitoring program was designed with limited knowledge of spatial and temporal variability and long-term trends within the system. This led to an extensive spatial and temporal sampling program. The data through 2003 showed high correlation within physical parameters measured (e.g., salinity, dissolved oxygen) and in biological measures such as chlorophyll fluorescence. To address the potential sampling redundancies in the measurement program, an assessment of the impact of reduced levels of monitoring on the ability to make water quality decisions was completed. The optimization was conducted by applying statistical models that took into account whether there was evidence of a seasonal pattern in the data. The optimization used model survey average readings to identify temporal fixed effects, model survey-average-corrected individual station readings to identify spatial fixed effects, corrected the individual station readings for temporal and spatial fixed effects and derived a correlation model for the corrected data, and applied the correlation model to characterize the correlation of annual average readings from reduced monitoring programs with true parameter levels. Reductions in the number of sampling stations were found less detrimental to the quality of the data for annual decision-making than reductions in the number of surveys per year, although there is less of a difference in this regard for dissolved oxygen than there is for chlorophyll. The analysis led to recommendations for a substantially lower monitoring effort with minimal loss of information. The recommendation supported an annual budget savings of approximately $183,000. Most of the savings was from fewer surveys as approximately $21,000 came from the reduction in the number of stations monitored from 21 to 7 and associated laboratory analytical costs.</abstract><cop>Dordrecht</cop><pub>Dordrecht : Springer Netherlands</pub><pmid>17562205</pmid><doi>10.1007/s10661-007-9785-0</doi><tpages>18</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0167-6369
ispartof Environmental monitoring and assessment, 2008-02, Vol.137 (1-3), p.505-522
issn 0167-6369
1573-2959
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_759320214
source MEDLINE; SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings
subjects Analysis methods
Applied sciences
Atmospheric Protection/Air Quality Control/Air Pollution
Chlorophyll
Chlorophyll - analysis
Coastal waters
Coasts
Correlation
Dissolved oxygen
Earth and Environmental Science
Earth sciences
Earth, ocean, space
Ecology
Ecotoxicology
Effluents
Engineering and environment geology. Geothermics
Environment
Environmental Management
Environmental monitoring
Environmental Monitoring - statistics & numerical data
Environmental protection
Exact sciences and technology
Harbors
Marine
Massachusetts
Massachusetts bay
Mathematical models
Models, Statistical
Monitoring
Monitoring program optimization
Monitoring/Environmental Analysis
Natural water pollution
Offshore
Optimization
Polls & surveys
Pollution
Pollution, environment geology
Reduction
Salinity
Sampling
Seasonal variations
Seasons
Seawaters, estuaries
Stations
Statistical methods
Statistical models
Studies
Temporal logic
Water monitoring
Water Pollution - analysis
Water quality
Water quality management
Water quality monitoring
Water resources
Water treatment and pollution
title Application of statistical modeling to optimize a coastal water quality monitoring program
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-06T15%3A58%3A44IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Application%20of%20statistical%20modeling%20to%20optimize%20a%20coastal%20water%20quality%20monitoring%20program&rft.jtitle=Environmental%20monitoring%20and%20assessment&rft.au=Hunt,%20Carlton%20D&rft.date=2008-02-01&rft.volume=137&rft.issue=1-3&rft.spage=505&rft.epage=522&rft.pages=505-522&rft.issn=0167-6369&rft.eissn=1573-2959&rft.coden=EMASDH&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s10661-007-9785-0&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E759320214%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=222009566&rft_id=info:pmid/17562205&rfr_iscdi=true