Environmental monitoring and assessment of a Great River ecosystem: the Upper Missouri River pilot
Most Great River ecosystems (GREs) are extensively modified and are not receiving adequate protection to prevent further habitat degradation and loss of biotic integrity. In the United States, ecological monitoring and assessment of GREs has lagged behind streams and estuaries, and the management of...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Environmental monitoring and assessment 2005-04, Vol.103 (1-3), p.21-40 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 40 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1-3 |
container_start_page | 21 |
container_title | Environmental monitoring and assessment |
container_volume | 103 |
creator | Schweiger, E William Bolgrien, David W Angradi, Ted R Kelly, John R |
description | Most Great River ecosystems (GREs) are extensively modified and are not receiving adequate protection to prevent further habitat degradation and loss of biotic integrity. In the United States, ecological monitoring and assessment of GREs has lagged behind streams and estuaries, and the management of GREs is hampered by the lack of unbiased data at appropriate spatial scales. Properties of GREs that make them challenging to monitor and assess include difficult sample logistics and high habitat diversity. The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency's Environmental Monitoring and Assessment Program (EMAP) has developed a comprehensive, regional-scale, survey-based monitoring approach to assessment of streams and estuaries, but has not yet conducted research on applying these tools to GRE monitoring. In this paper we present an overview of an EMAP research project on the Upper Missouri River (UMR). We summarize the assessment objectives for the study, the design for selecting sample locations, the indicators measured at these sites and the tools used to analyze data. We present an example of the type of statements that can be made with EMAP monitoring data. With modification, the set of methodologies developed by EMAP may be well suited for assessment of GREs in general. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s10661-005-1010-4 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_759320089</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>14738834</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c420t-a64a4b3fbfdc49475450d97854246b827dc1b0a78f51a3a1aa9464571718ae403</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkU1rFEEQhpugmDX6A3KRxoOexlRNf3sLS4xCRAjm3PTM9CQdZqbHrtlA_r2z7ILgQU8N1U-9RdXD2DnCJwQwF4SgNVYAqkJAqOQJ26Ayoqqdci_YBlCbSgvtTtlrokcAcEa6V-wUldXorNqw5mp6SiVPY5yWMPAxT2nJJU33PEwdD0SRaP_Hc88Dvy4xLPw2PcXCY5vpmZY4fubLQ-R387wWvyeivCvpyMxpyMsb9rIPA8W3x_eM3X25-rn9Wt38uP62vbypWlnDUgUtg2xE3_RdK500SironLFK1lI3tjZdiw0EY3uFQQQMwUktlUGDNkQJ4ox9POTOJf_aRVr8mKiNwxCmmHfkjXKiBrBuJT_8k0QjUdXG_h-URlgr5Aq-_wt8XM8wreuuY1GiBaVWCA9QWzJRib2fSxpDefYIfi_UH4T6VajfC_X74HfH4F0zxu5Px9Gg-A1wQJqI</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>751418055</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Environmental monitoring and assessment of a Great River ecosystem: the Upper Missouri River pilot</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings</source><creator>Schweiger, E William ; Bolgrien, David W ; Angradi, Ted R ; Kelly, John R</creator><creatorcontrib>Schweiger, E William ; Bolgrien, David W ; Angradi, Ted R ; Kelly, John R</creatorcontrib><description>Most Great River ecosystems (GREs) are extensively modified and are not receiving adequate protection to prevent further habitat degradation and loss of biotic integrity. In the United States, ecological monitoring and assessment of GREs has lagged behind streams and estuaries, and the management of GREs is hampered by the lack of unbiased data at appropriate spatial scales. Properties of GREs that make them challenging to monitor and assess include difficult sample logistics and high habitat diversity. The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency's Environmental Monitoring and Assessment Program (EMAP) has developed a comprehensive, regional-scale, survey-based monitoring approach to assessment of streams and estuaries, but has not yet conducted research on applying these tools to GRE monitoring. In this paper we present an overview of an EMAP research project on the Upper Missouri River (UMR). We summarize the assessment objectives for the study, the design for selecting sample locations, the indicators measured at these sites and the tools used to analyze data. We present an example of the type of statements that can be made with EMAP monitoring data. With modification, the set of methodologies developed by EMAP may be well suited for assessment of GREs in general.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0167-6369</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1573-2959</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s10661-005-1010-4</identifier><identifier>PMID: 15861985</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Netherlands: Springer Nature B.V</publisher><subject>Aquatic ecosystems ; Conservation of Natural Resources ; Creeks & streams ; Ecological monitoring ; Ecosystem ; Environment ; Environmental degradation ; Environmental monitoring ; Environmental Monitoring - methods ; Environmental Monitoring - standards ; Environmental protection ; Estuaries ; Freshwater ; Montana ; North Dakota ; Population ; Research projects ; River ecology ; Rivers ; South Dakota</subject><ispartof>Environmental monitoring and assessment, 2005-04, Vol.103 (1-3), p.21-40</ispartof><rights>Springer Science + Business Media, Inc. 2005</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c420t-a64a4b3fbfdc49475450d97854246b827dc1b0a78f51a3a1aa9464571718ae403</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c420t-a64a4b3fbfdc49475450d97854246b827dc1b0a78f51a3a1aa9464571718ae403</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15861985$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Schweiger, E William</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bolgrien, David W</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Angradi, Ted R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kelly, John R</creatorcontrib><title>Environmental monitoring and assessment of a Great River ecosystem: the Upper Missouri River pilot</title><title>Environmental monitoring and assessment</title><addtitle>Environ Monit Assess</addtitle><description>Most Great River ecosystems (GREs) are extensively modified and are not receiving adequate protection to prevent further habitat degradation and loss of biotic integrity. In the United States, ecological monitoring and assessment of GREs has lagged behind streams and estuaries, and the management of GREs is hampered by the lack of unbiased data at appropriate spatial scales. Properties of GREs that make them challenging to monitor and assess include difficult sample logistics and high habitat diversity. The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency's Environmental Monitoring and Assessment Program (EMAP) has developed a comprehensive, regional-scale, survey-based monitoring approach to assessment of streams and estuaries, but has not yet conducted research on applying these tools to GRE monitoring. In this paper we present an overview of an EMAP research project on the Upper Missouri River (UMR). We summarize the assessment objectives for the study, the design for selecting sample locations, the indicators measured at these sites and the tools used to analyze data. We present an example of the type of statements that can be made with EMAP monitoring data. With modification, the set of methodologies developed by EMAP may be well suited for assessment of GREs in general.</description><subject>Aquatic ecosystems</subject><subject>Conservation of Natural Resources</subject><subject>Creeks & streams</subject><subject>Ecological monitoring</subject><subject>Ecosystem</subject><subject>Environment</subject><subject>Environmental degradation</subject><subject>Environmental monitoring</subject><subject>Environmental Monitoring - methods</subject><subject>Environmental Monitoring - standards</subject><subject>Environmental protection</subject><subject>Estuaries</subject><subject>Freshwater</subject><subject>Montana</subject><subject>North Dakota</subject><subject>Population</subject><subject>Research projects</subject><subject>River ecology</subject><subject>Rivers</subject><subject>South Dakota</subject><issn>0167-6369</issn><issn>1573-2959</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2005</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkU1rFEEQhpugmDX6A3KRxoOexlRNf3sLS4xCRAjm3PTM9CQdZqbHrtlA_r2z7ILgQU8N1U-9RdXD2DnCJwQwF4SgNVYAqkJAqOQJ26Ayoqqdci_YBlCbSgvtTtlrokcAcEa6V-wUldXorNqw5mp6SiVPY5yWMPAxT2nJJU33PEwdD0SRaP_Hc88Dvy4xLPw2PcXCY5vpmZY4fubLQ-R387wWvyeivCvpyMxpyMsb9rIPA8W3x_eM3X25-rn9Wt38uP62vbypWlnDUgUtg2xE3_RdK500SironLFK1lI3tjZdiw0EY3uFQQQMwUktlUGDNkQJ4ox9POTOJf_aRVr8mKiNwxCmmHfkjXKiBrBuJT_8k0QjUdXG_h-URlgr5Aq-_wt8XM8wreuuY1GiBaVWCA9QWzJRib2fSxpDefYIfi_UH4T6VajfC_X74HfH4F0zxu5Px9Gg-A1wQJqI</recordid><startdate>20050401</startdate><enddate>20050401</enddate><creator>Schweiger, E William</creator><creator>Bolgrien, David W</creator><creator>Angradi, Ted R</creator><creator>Kelly, John R</creator><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QH</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7TN</scope><scope>7U7</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>87Z</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H97</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>SOI</scope><scope>7TV</scope><scope>7U6</scope><scope>H95</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20050401</creationdate><title>Environmental monitoring and assessment of a Great River ecosystem: the Upper Missouri River pilot</title><author>Schweiger, E William ; Bolgrien, David W ; Angradi, Ted R ; Kelly, John R</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c420t-a64a4b3fbfdc49475450d97854246b827dc1b0a78f51a3a1aa9464571718ae403</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2005</creationdate><topic>Aquatic ecosystems</topic><topic>Conservation of Natural Resources</topic><topic>Creeks & streams</topic><topic>Ecological monitoring</topic><topic>Ecosystem</topic><topic>Environment</topic><topic>Environmental degradation</topic><topic>Environmental monitoring</topic><topic>Environmental Monitoring - methods</topic><topic>Environmental Monitoring - standards</topic><topic>Environmental protection</topic><topic>Estuaries</topic><topic>Freshwater</topic><topic>Montana</topic><topic>North Dakota</topic><topic>Population</topic><topic>Research projects</topic><topic>River ecology</topic><topic>Rivers</topic><topic>South Dakota</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Schweiger, E William</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bolgrien, David W</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Angradi, Ted R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kelly, John R</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Aqualine</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Oceanic Abstracts</collection><collection>Toxicology Abstracts</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 3: Aquatic Pollution & Environmental Quality</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Pollution Abstracts</collection><collection>Sustainability Science Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 1: Biological Sciences & Living Resources</collection><jtitle>Environmental monitoring and assessment</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Schweiger, E William</au><au>Bolgrien, David W</au><au>Angradi, Ted R</au><au>Kelly, John R</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Environmental monitoring and assessment of a Great River ecosystem: the Upper Missouri River pilot</atitle><jtitle>Environmental monitoring and assessment</jtitle><addtitle>Environ Monit Assess</addtitle><date>2005-04-01</date><risdate>2005</risdate><volume>103</volume><issue>1-3</issue><spage>21</spage><epage>40</epage><pages>21-40</pages><issn>0167-6369</issn><eissn>1573-2959</eissn><abstract>Most Great River ecosystems (GREs) are extensively modified and are not receiving adequate protection to prevent further habitat degradation and loss of biotic integrity. In the United States, ecological monitoring and assessment of GREs has lagged behind streams and estuaries, and the management of GREs is hampered by the lack of unbiased data at appropriate spatial scales. Properties of GREs that make them challenging to monitor and assess include difficult sample logistics and high habitat diversity. The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency's Environmental Monitoring and Assessment Program (EMAP) has developed a comprehensive, regional-scale, survey-based monitoring approach to assessment of streams and estuaries, but has not yet conducted research on applying these tools to GRE monitoring. In this paper we present an overview of an EMAP research project on the Upper Missouri River (UMR). We summarize the assessment objectives for the study, the design for selecting sample locations, the indicators measured at these sites and the tools used to analyze data. We present an example of the type of statements that can be made with EMAP monitoring data. With modification, the set of methodologies developed by EMAP may be well suited for assessment of GREs in general.</abstract><cop>Netherlands</cop><pub>Springer Nature B.V</pub><pmid>15861985</pmid><doi>10.1007/s10661-005-1010-4</doi><tpages>20</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0167-6369 |
ispartof | Environmental monitoring and assessment, 2005-04, Vol.103 (1-3), p.21-40 |
issn | 0167-6369 1573-2959 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_759320089 |
source | MEDLINE; SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings |
subjects | Aquatic ecosystems Conservation of Natural Resources Creeks & streams Ecological monitoring Ecosystem Environment Environmental degradation Environmental monitoring Environmental Monitoring - methods Environmental Monitoring - standards Environmental protection Estuaries Freshwater Montana North Dakota Population Research projects River ecology Rivers South Dakota |
title | Environmental monitoring and assessment of a Great River ecosystem: the Upper Missouri River pilot |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-08T21%3A40%3A51IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Environmental%20monitoring%20and%20assessment%20of%20a%20Great%20River%20ecosystem:%20the%20Upper%20Missouri%20River%20pilot&rft.jtitle=Environmental%20monitoring%20and%20assessment&rft.au=Schweiger,%20E%20William&rft.date=2005-04-01&rft.volume=103&rft.issue=1-3&rft.spage=21&rft.epage=40&rft.pages=21-40&rft.issn=0167-6369&rft.eissn=1573-2959&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s10661-005-1010-4&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E14738834%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=751418055&rft_id=info:pmid/15861985&rfr_iscdi=true |