Hearing is not necessarily believing in nocturnal anurans

The recent discovery of the use of visual cues for mate choice by nocturnal acoustic species raises the important, and to date unaddressed, question of how these signals affect the outcome of mate choice predicted by female preference for male calls. In order to address this question, we presented f...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Biology letters (2005) 2010-10, Vol.6 (5), p.633-635
Hauptverfasser: Richardson, Christina, Gomez, Doris, Durieux, Romain, Théry, Marc, Joly, Pierre, Léna, Jean-Paul, Plénet, Sandrine, Lengagne, Thierry
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 635
container_issue 5
container_start_page 633
container_title Biology letters (2005)
container_volume 6
creator Richardson, Christina
Gomez, Doris
Durieux, Romain
Théry, Marc
Joly, Pierre
Léna, Jean-Paul
Plénet, Sandrine
Lengagne, Thierry
description The recent discovery of the use of visual cues for mate choice by nocturnal acoustic species raises the important, and to date unaddressed, question of how these signals affect the outcome of mate choice predicted by female preference for male calls. In order to address this question, we presented female Hyla arborea tree frogs with a series of choices between combinations of acoustic and visual cues of varying quality in nocturnal conditions. While females exhibited the expected preference for a combination of attractive values for visual and acoustic signals over combinations of unattractive values for both signals, when presented with conflicting acoustic and visual cues, they equally adopted one of two strategies, preferring either attractive calls or intense vocal sac coloration. This constitutes novel evidence that the outcome of mate choice, as predicted on the basis of male calling quality, can be drastically different when additional communication modalities—in this case vision—are taken into account. These results also highlight the possible existence of individual variation in female rules for cue prioritization. The implications of these results for the study of mate choice in nocturnal acoustic species are discussed.
doi_str_mv 10.1098/rsbl.2010.0038
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_royal</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_759316032</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>759316032</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c624t-68a1bf4bee4436108b81b13030579e947ccd6ee3dba2b58641d627700c9048903</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNUU1v1DAQtRAVLQtXjig3Lux2HH_EviC1FbBIK1XiQ-JmOc5s6yrrLHay0vLrcZqygiIKF3_MvJn3Zh4hLygsKGh1GlPdLkrIXwCmHpETWnE-16L6-vjwlvSYPE3pJiOqCsQTclwCY4JqeUL0Em304arwqQhdXwR0mFIOtfuixtbj7jYZctL1Qwy2LWwYog3pGTla2zbh87t7Rr68e_v5YjlfXb7_cHG2mjtZ8n4ulaX1mteInDNJQdWK1pQBA1Fp1LxyrpGIrKltWQslOW1kmWWC08CVBjYjb6a-26HeYOMw9NG2Zhv9xsa96aw3v2eCvzZX3c6UOvPlY0ZeTw2u75Utz1Ymx1KDBkCUNNPuaIa_uuOL3bcBU282PjlsWxuwG5JRgnKZZ_k3shKaUQms_A-koArGrczIYkK62KUUcX1QTMGMjpvRcTM6bkbHc8HLX9dzgP-0OAPsBIjdPg_bOY_93tx0t2Ym8_HT-WonvTCgGAXOOUjz3W8nGml8SgMacY_1TxHsIY6_SP8BIH3YBg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>755180130</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Hearing is not necessarily believing in nocturnal anurans</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Richardson, Christina ; Gomez, Doris ; Durieux, Romain ; Théry, Marc ; Joly, Pierre ; Léna, Jean-Paul ; Plénet, Sandrine ; Lengagne, Thierry</creator><creatorcontrib>Richardson, Christina ; Gomez, Doris ; Durieux, Romain ; Théry, Marc ; Joly, Pierre ; Léna, Jean-Paul ; Plénet, Sandrine ; Lengagne, Thierry</creatorcontrib><description>The recent discovery of the use of visual cues for mate choice by nocturnal acoustic species raises the important, and to date unaddressed, question of how these signals affect the outcome of mate choice predicted by female preference for male calls. In order to address this question, we presented female Hyla arborea tree frogs with a series of choices between combinations of acoustic and visual cues of varying quality in nocturnal conditions. While females exhibited the expected preference for a combination of attractive values for visual and acoustic signals over combinations of unattractive values for both signals, when presented with conflicting acoustic and visual cues, they equally adopted one of two strategies, preferring either attractive calls or intense vocal sac coloration. This constitutes novel evidence that the outcome of mate choice, as predicted on the basis of male calling quality, can be drastically different when additional communication modalities—in this case vision—are taken into account. These results also highlight the possible existence of individual variation in female rules for cue prioritization. The implications of these results for the study of mate choice in nocturnal acoustic species are discussed.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1744-9561</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1744-957X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1098/rsbl.2010.0038</identifier><identifier>PMID: 20335196</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: The Royal Society</publisher><subject>Animal Behaviour ; Animals ; Anura ; Anura - physiology ; Anurans ; Biodiversity and Ecology ; Environmental Sciences ; Female ; Hearing ; Hyla arborea ; Male ; Mate Choice ; Multimodal Communication ; Night Vision ; Sexual Selection</subject><ispartof>Biology letters (2005), 2010-10, Vol.6 (5), p.633-635</ispartof><rights>2010 The Royal Society</rights><rights>Distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License</rights><rights>2010 The Royal Society 2010</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c624t-68a1bf4bee4436108b81b13030579e947ccd6ee3dba2b58641d627700c9048903</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c624t-68a1bf4bee4436108b81b13030579e947ccd6ee3dba2b58641d627700c9048903</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-7840-6068 ; 0000-0003-4972-5590 ; 0000-0002-9144-3426</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2936129/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2936129/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,723,776,780,881,27901,27902,53766,53768</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20335196$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://hal.science/halsde-00521277$$DView record in HAL$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Richardson, Christina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gomez, Doris</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Durieux, Romain</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Théry, Marc</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Joly, Pierre</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Léna, Jean-Paul</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Plénet, Sandrine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lengagne, Thierry</creatorcontrib><title>Hearing is not necessarily believing in nocturnal anurans</title><title>Biology letters (2005)</title><addtitle>Biol. Lett</addtitle><addtitle>Biol Lett</addtitle><description>The recent discovery of the use of visual cues for mate choice by nocturnal acoustic species raises the important, and to date unaddressed, question of how these signals affect the outcome of mate choice predicted by female preference for male calls. In order to address this question, we presented female Hyla arborea tree frogs with a series of choices between combinations of acoustic and visual cues of varying quality in nocturnal conditions. While females exhibited the expected preference for a combination of attractive values for visual and acoustic signals over combinations of unattractive values for both signals, when presented with conflicting acoustic and visual cues, they equally adopted one of two strategies, preferring either attractive calls or intense vocal sac coloration. This constitutes novel evidence that the outcome of mate choice, as predicted on the basis of male calling quality, can be drastically different when additional communication modalities—in this case vision—are taken into account. These results also highlight the possible existence of individual variation in female rules for cue prioritization. The implications of these results for the study of mate choice in nocturnal acoustic species are discussed.</description><subject>Animal Behaviour</subject><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Anura</subject><subject>Anura - physiology</subject><subject>Anurans</subject><subject>Biodiversity and Ecology</subject><subject>Environmental Sciences</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Hearing</subject><subject>Hyla arborea</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Mate Choice</subject><subject>Multimodal Communication</subject><subject>Night Vision</subject><subject>Sexual Selection</subject><issn>1744-9561</issn><issn>1744-957X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2010</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqNUU1v1DAQtRAVLQtXjig3Lux2HH_EviC1FbBIK1XiQ-JmOc5s6yrrLHay0vLrcZqygiIKF3_MvJn3Zh4hLygsKGh1GlPdLkrIXwCmHpETWnE-16L6-vjwlvSYPE3pJiOqCsQTclwCY4JqeUL0Em304arwqQhdXwR0mFIOtfuixtbj7jYZctL1Qwy2LWwYog3pGTla2zbh87t7Rr68e_v5YjlfXb7_cHG2mjtZ8n4ulaX1mteInDNJQdWK1pQBA1Fp1LxyrpGIrKltWQslOW1kmWWC08CVBjYjb6a-26HeYOMw9NG2Zhv9xsa96aw3v2eCvzZX3c6UOvPlY0ZeTw2u75Utz1Ymx1KDBkCUNNPuaIa_uuOL3bcBU282PjlsWxuwG5JRgnKZZ_k3shKaUQms_A-koArGrczIYkK62KUUcX1QTMGMjpvRcTM6bkbHc8HLX9dzgP-0OAPsBIjdPg_bOY_93tx0t2Ym8_HT-WonvTCgGAXOOUjz3W8nGml8SgMacY_1TxHsIY6_SP8BIH3YBg</recordid><startdate>20101023</startdate><enddate>20101023</enddate><creator>Richardson, Christina</creator><creator>Gomez, Doris</creator><creator>Durieux, Romain</creator><creator>Théry, Marc</creator><creator>Joly, Pierre</creator><creator>Léna, Jean-Paul</creator><creator>Plénet, Sandrine</creator><creator>Lengagne, Thierry</creator><general>The Royal Society</general><general>Royal Society, The</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>1XC</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7840-6068</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4972-5590</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9144-3426</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20101023</creationdate><title>Hearing is not necessarily believing in nocturnal anurans</title><author>Richardson, Christina ; Gomez, Doris ; Durieux, Romain ; Théry, Marc ; Joly, Pierre ; Léna, Jean-Paul ; Plénet, Sandrine ; Lengagne, Thierry</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c624t-68a1bf4bee4436108b81b13030579e947ccd6ee3dba2b58641d627700c9048903</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2010</creationdate><topic>Animal Behaviour</topic><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Anura</topic><topic>Anura - physiology</topic><topic>Anurans</topic><topic>Biodiversity and Ecology</topic><topic>Environmental Sciences</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Hearing</topic><topic>Hyla arborea</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Mate Choice</topic><topic>Multimodal Communication</topic><topic>Night Vision</topic><topic>Sexual Selection</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Richardson, Christina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gomez, Doris</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Durieux, Romain</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Théry, Marc</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Joly, Pierre</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Léna, Jean-Paul</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Plénet, Sandrine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lengagne, Thierry</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Hyper Article en Ligne (HAL)</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Biology letters (2005)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Richardson, Christina</au><au>Gomez, Doris</au><au>Durieux, Romain</au><au>Théry, Marc</au><au>Joly, Pierre</au><au>Léna, Jean-Paul</au><au>Plénet, Sandrine</au><au>Lengagne, Thierry</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Hearing is not necessarily believing in nocturnal anurans</atitle><jtitle>Biology letters (2005)</jtitle><stitle>Biol. Lett</stitle><addtitle>Biol Lett</addtitle><date>2010-10-23</date><risdate>2010</risdate><volume>6</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>633</spage><epage>635</epage><pages>633-635</pages><issn>1744-9561</issn><eissn>1744-957X</eissn><abstract>The recent discovery of the use of visual cues for mate choice by nocturnal acoustic species raises the important, and to date unaddressed, question of how these signals affect the outcome of mate choice predicted by female preference for male calls. In order to address this question, we presented female Hyla arborea tree frogs with a series of choices between combinations of acoustic and visual cues of varying quality in nocturnal conditions. While females exhibited the expected preference for a combination of attractive values for visual and acoustic signals over combinations of unattractive values for both signals, when presented with conflicting acoustic and visual cues, they equally adopted one of two strategies, preferring either attractive calls or intense vocal sac coloration. This constitutes novel evidence that the outcome of mate choice, as predicted on the basis of male calling quality, can be drastically different when additional communication modalities—in this case vision—are taken into account. These results also highlight the possible existence of individual variation in female rules for cue prioritization. The implications of these results for the study of mate choice in nocturnal acoustic species are discussed.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>The Royal Society</pub><pmid>20335196</pmid><doi>10.1098/rsbl.2010.0038</doi><tpages>3</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7840-6068</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4972-5590</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9144-3426</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1744-9561
ispartof Biology letters (2005), 2010-10, Vol.6 (5), p.633-635
issn 1744-9561
1744-957X
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_759316032
source MEDLINE; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; PubMed Central
subjects Animal Behaviour
Animals
Anura
Anura - physiology
Anurans
Biodiversity and Ecology
Environmental Sciences
Female
Hearing
Hyla arborea
Male
Mate Choice
Multimodal Communication
Night Vision
Sexual Selection
title Hearing is not necessarily believing in nocturnal anurans
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-21T00%3A43%3A40IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_royal&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Hearing%20is%20not%20necessarily%20believing%20in%20nocturnal%20anurans&rft.jtitle=Biology%20letters%20(2005)&rft.au=Richardson,%20Christina&rft.date=2010-10-23&rft.volume=6&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=633&rft.epage=635&rft.pages=633-635&rft.issn=1744-9561&rft.eissn=1744-957X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1098/rsbl.2010.0038&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_royal%3E759316032%3C/proquest_royal%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=755180130&rft_id=info:pmid/20335196&rfr_iscdi=true