Uppermost Cretaceous megaloolithid eggs from the Haţeg Basin, Romania, associated with hadrosaur hatchlings: Search for explanation

Four localities in the Upper Cretaceous (Maastrichtian) of the Haţeg Basin (in order of discovery, Tuştea, Toteşti-baraj, Nălaţ-Vad and Livezi) have yielded clutches of megaloolithid eggs. Egg morphology and size, eggshell thickness, external ornamentation and internal microstructure, pore density a...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Palaeogeography, palaeoclimatology, palaeoecology palaeoclimatology, palaeoecology, 2010-07, Vol.293 (3), p.360-374
Hauptverfasser: Grigorescu, Dan, Garcia, Géraldine, Csiki, Zoltán, Codrea, Vlad, Bojar, Ana-Voica
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 374
container_issue 3
container_start_page 360
container_title Palaeogeography, palaeoclimatology, palaeoecology
container_volume 293
creator Grigorescu, Dan
Garcia, Géraldine
Csiki, Zoltán
Codrea, Vlad
Bojar, Ana-Voica
description Four localities in the Upper Cretaceous (Maastrichtian) of the Haţeg Basin (in order of discovery, Tuştea, Toteşti-baraj, Nălaţ-Vad and Livezi) have yielded clutches of megaloolithid eggs. Egg morphology and size, eggshell thickness, external ornamentation and internal microstructure, pore density and geometry, as well as morphology of the clutches (where this could be observed) are all similar among the four localities, allowing the assignment of the eggs to Megaloolithus cf. siruguei. Most egg occurrences are related to paleosols of variable chemical composition and maturity, developed within different parts of the floodplain. The nesting horizon from Tuştea was partially reconstructed on a 160 m 2 surface, allowing a thorough analysis of the taphonomy of the eggs and clutches. It has also yielded hatchling remains at different ontogenetic developmental stages, and even, more rarely, embryo remains as well. The bones occur in the vicinity of or even within the clutches; in a single case, incompletely ossified embryonic skeletal remains, including a dentary tooth, were found inside an incomplete egg. Without exception, the neonate remains belong to the basal hadrosaurid Telmatosaurus transsylvanicus, one of the common dinosaur species in the faunal assemblage. No sauropod neonate remains were found in the nesting horizon from Tuştea; only a fragmentary pelvic girdle and caudal vertebrae of an adult titanosaurian were unearthed recently 20 cm above the nesting horizon. None of the other three megaloolithid localities in the Haţeg Basin provided neonatal remains of any dinosaur species. Despite the general consensus that the Megaloolithus oogenus belongs exclusively to titanosaurian sauropods, the co-occurrence of megaloolithid eggs and hadrosaurid neonatal remains at Tuştea seems to contradict this view. Previous cladistic analyses of dinosauroid ootaxa might offer an explanation of this controversial issue. These analyses have revealed that Megaloolithidae appears to be the sister group of Spheroolithidae, usually regarded as a hadrosaurid egg family. Perhaps a significant amount of homoplasy is present in the evolution of dinosaurian eggs, whose structure depends on incubation environment as well as biology and physiology of the reproductive system itself, and that the oospecies of Megaloolithus might have been laid by different higher-level taxa, including both titanosaurian sauropods and (basal) hadrosaurids. Understanding the significance of this para
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.palaeo.2010.03.031
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_759311247</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0031018210001707</els_id><sourcerecordid>759311247</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a361t-b28415a165483912a7fd93414edf292249a2dbf83e3b3056acb77c7e7a2061053</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9UMtqHDEQFCYBbxz_gQ-65eLZqKV55hBIljgOGAJ-gG-iV9Mzo2VmNJG0edz9J_4W_1e0bM6Bhm6KqqKrGLsAsQYB5fvdesERya2lSJBQaeCEraCuZFZC-fiKrUSCMgG1PGVvQtgJIWSp5Io9PSwL-cmFyDeeIhpy-8An6nF0brRxsC2nvg-8827icSB-jS_P1PPPGOx8yW_dhLPFS44hOGMxUst_JRkfsPUu4N6nK5phtHMfPvA7Qm8G3jnP6fcy4ozRuvkte93hGOj83z5jD1df7jfX2c33r982n24yVCXEbCvrHAqEsshr1YDEqmsblUNObScbKfMGZbvtakVqq0RRotlWlamoQilKEIU6Y--Ovot3P_YUop5sMDSmPw6xdVU0CkDmVWLmR6ZJIYKnTi_eTuj_aBD60Lne6WPn-tC5FioNJNnHo4xSip-WvA7G0myotZ5M1K2z_zf4C7FCjpo</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>759311247</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Uppermost Cretaceous megaloolithid eggs from the Haţeg Basin, Romania, associated with hadrosaur hatchlings: Search for explanation</title><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete</source><creator>Grigorescu, Dan ; Garcia, Géraldine ; Csiki, Zoltán ; Codrea, Vlad ; Bojar, Ana-Voica</creator><creatorcontrib>Grigorescu, Dan ; Garcia, Géraldine ; Csiki, Zoltán ; Codrea, Vlad ; Bojar, Ana-Voica</creatorcontrib><description>Four localities in the Upper Cretaceous (Maastrichtian) of the Haţeg Basin (in order of discovery, Tuştea, Toteşti-baraj, Nălaţ-Vad and Livezi) have yielded clutches of megaloolithid eggs. Egg morphology and size, eggshell thickness, external ornamentation and internal microstructure, pore density and geometry, as well as morphology of the clutches (where this could be observed) are all similar among the four localities, allowing the assignment of the eggs to Megaloolithus cf. siruguei. Most egg occurrences are related to paleosols of variable chemical composition and maturity, developed within different parts of the floodplain. The nesting horizon from Tuştea was partially reconstructed on a 160 m 2 surface, allowing a thorough analysis of the taphonomy of the eggs and clutches. It has also yielded hatchling remains at different ontogenetic developmental stages, and even, more rarely, embryo remains as well. The bones occur in the vicinity of or even within the clutches; in a single case, incompletely ossified embryonic skeletal remains, including a dentary tooth, were found inside an incomplete egg. Without exception, the neonate remains belong to the basal hadrosaurid Telmatosaurus transsylvanicus, one of the common dinosaur species in the faunal assemblage. No sauropod neonate remains were found in the nesting horizon from Tuştea; only a fragmentary pelvic girdle and caudal vertebrae of an adult titanosaurian were unearthed recently 20 cm above the nesting horizon. None of the other three megaloolithid localities in the Haţeg Basin provided neonatal remains of any dinosaur species. Despite the general consensus that the Megaloolithus oogenus belongs exclusively to titanosaurian sauropods, the co-occurrence of megaloolithid eggs and hadrosaurid neonatal remains at Tuştea seems to contradict this view. Previous cladistic analyses of dinosauroid ootaxa might offer an explanation of this controversial issue. These analyses have revealed that Megaloolithidae appears to be the sister group of Spheroolithidae, usually regarded as a hadrosaurid egg family. Perhaps a significant amount of homoplasy is present in the evolution of dinosaurian eggs, whose structure depends on incubation environment as well as biology and physiology of the reproductive system itself, and that the oospecies of Megaloolithus might have been laid by different higher-level taxa, including both titanosaurian sauropods and (basal) hadrosaurids. Understanding the significance of this paraphyletic distribution requires further study.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0031-0182</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1872-616X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.palaeo.2010.03.031</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Elsevier B.V</publisher><subject>Basins ; cladistics ; Developmental stages ; Eggs ; Embryos ; Haţeg Basin ; Maastrichtian ; Megaloolithidae ; Neonates ; Reproductive system ; Spine ; Teeth ; Telmatosaurus</subject><ispartof>Palaeogeography, palaeoclimatology, palaeoecology, 2010-07, Vol.293 (3), p.360-374</ispartof><rights>2010 Elsevier B.V.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a361t-b28415a165483912a7fd93414edf292249a2dbf83e3b3056acb77c7e7a2061053</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-a361t-b28415a165483912a7fd93414edf292249a2dbf83e3b3056acb77c7e7a2061053</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0031018210001707$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,27901,27902,65534</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Grigorescu, Dan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Garcia, Géraldine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Csiki, Zoltán</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Codrea, Vlad</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bojar, Ana-Voica</creatorcontrib><title>Uppermost Cretaceous megaloolithid eggs from the Haţeg Basin, Romania, associated with hadrosaur hatchlings: Search for explanation</title><title>Palaeogeography, palaeoclimatology, palaeoecology</title><description>Four localities in the Upper Cretaceous (Maastrichtian) of the Haţeg Basin (in order of discovery, Tuştea, Toteşti-baraj, Nălaţ-Vad and Livezi) have yielded clutches of megaloolithid eggs. Egg morphology and size, eggshell thickness, external ornamentation and internal microstructure, pore density and geometry, as well as morphology of the clutches (where this could be observed) are all similar among the four localities, allowing the assignment of the eggs to Megaloolithus cf. siruguei. Most egg occurrences are related to paleosols of variable chemical composition and maturity, developed within different parts of the floodplain. The nesting horizon from Tuştea was partially reconstructed on a 160 m 2 surface, allowing a thorough analysis of the taphonomy of the eggs and clutches. It has also yielded hatchling remains at different ontogenetic developmental stages, and even, more rarely, embryo remains as well. The bones occur in the vicinity of or even within the clutches; in a single case, incompletely ossified embryonic skeletal remains, including a dentary tooth, were found inside an incomplete egg. Without exception, the neonate remains belong to the basal hadrosaurid Telmatosaurus transsylvanicus, one of the common dinosaur species in the faunal assemblage. No sauropod neonate remains were found in the nesting horizon from Tuştea; only a fragmentary pelvic girdle and caudal vertebrae of an adult titanosaurian were unearthed recently 20 cm above the nesting horizon. None of the other three megaloolithid localities in the Haţeg Basin provided neonatal remains of any dinosaur species. Despite the general consensus that the Megaloolithus oogenus belongs exclusively to titanosaurian sauropods, the co-occurrence of megaloolithid eggs and hadrosaurid neonatal remains at Tuştea seems to contradict this view. Previous cladistic analyses of dinosauroid ootaxa might offer an explanation of this controversial issue. These analyses have revealed that Megaloolithidae appears to be the sister group of Spheroolithidae, usually regarded as a hadrosaurid egg family. Perhaps a significant amount of homoplasy is present in the evolution of dinosaurian eggs, whose structure depends on incubation environment as well as biology and physiology of the reproductive system itself, and that the oospecies of Megaloolithus might have been laid by different higher-level taxa, including both titanosaurian sauropods and (basal) hadrosaurids. Understanding the significance of this paraphyletic distribution requires further study.</description><subject>Basins</subject><subject>cladistics</subject><subject>Developmental stages</subject><subject>Eggs</subject><subject>Embryos</subject><subject>Haţeg Basin</subject><subject>Maastrichtian</subject><subject>Megaloolithidae</subject><subject>Neonates</subject><subject>Reproductive system</subject><subject>Spine</subject><subject>Teeth</subject><subject>Telmatosaurus</subject><issn>0031-0182</issn><issn>1872-616X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2010</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9UMtqHDEQFCYBbxz_gQ-65eLZqKV55hBIljgOGAJ-gG-iV9Mzo2VmNJG0edz9J_4W_1e0bM6Bhm6KqqKrGLsAsQYB5fvdesERya2lSJBQaeCEraCuZFZC-fiKrUSCMgG1PGVvQtgJIWSp5Io9PSwL-cmFyDeeIhpy-8An6nF0brRxsC2nvg-8827icSB-jS_P1PPPGOx8yW_dhLPFS44hOGMxUst_JRkfsPUu4N6nK5phtHMfPvA7Qm8G3jnP6fcy4ozRuvkte93hGOj83z5jD1df7jfX2c33r982n24yVCXEbCvrHAqEsshr1YDEqmsblUNObScbKfMGZbvtakVqq0RRotlWlamoQilKEIU6Y--Ovot3P_YUop5sMDSmPw6xdVU0CkDmVWLmR6ZJIYKnTi_eTuj_aBD60Lne6WPn-tC5FioNJNnHo4xSip-WvA7G0myotZ5M1K2z_zf4C7FCjpo</recordid><startdate>20100715</startdate><enddate>20100715</enddate><creator>Grigorescu, Dan</creator><creator>Garcia, Géraldine</creator><creator>Csiki, Zoltán</creator><creator>Codrea, Vlad</creator><creator>Bojar, Ana-Voica</creator><general>Elsevier B.V</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>C1K</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20100715</creationdate><title>Uppermost Cretaceous megaloolithid eggs from the Haţeg Basin, Romania, associated with hadrosaur hatchlings: Search for explanation</title><author>Grigorescu, Dan ; Garcia, Géraldine ; Csiki, Zoltán ; Codrea, Vlad ; Bojar, Ana-Voica</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a361t-b28415a165483912a7fd93414edf292249a2dbf83e3b3056acb77c7e7a2061053</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2010</creationdate><topic>Basins</topic><topic>cladistics</topic><topic>Developmental stages</topic><topic>Eggs</topic><topic>Embryos</topic><topic>Haţeg Basin</topic><topic>Maastrichtian</topic><topic>Megaloolithidae</topic><topic>Neonates</topic><topic>Reproductive system</topic><topic>Spine</topic><topic>Teeth</topic><topic>Telmatosaurus</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Grigorescu, Dan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Garcia, Géraldine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Csiki, Zoltán</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Codrea, Vlad</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bojar, Ana-Voica</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><jtitle>Palaeogeography, palaeoclimatology, palaeoecology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Grigorescu, Dan</au><au>Garcia, Géraldine</au><au>Csiki, Zoltán</au><au>Codrea, Vlad</au><au>Bojar, Ana-Voica</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Uppermost Cretaceous megaloolithid eggs from the Haţeg Basin, Romania, associated with hadrosaur hatchlings: Search for explanation</atitle><jtitle>Palaeogeography, palaeoclimatology, palaeoecology</jtitle><date>2010-07-15</date><risdate>2010</risdate><volume>293</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>360</spage><epage>374</epage><pages>360-374</pages><issn>0031-0182</issn><eissn>1872-616X</eissn><abstract>Four localities in the Upper Cretaceous (Maastrichtian) of the Haţeg Basin (in order of discovery, Tuştea, Toteşti-baraj, Nălaţ-Vad and Livezi) have yielded clutches of megaloolithid eggs. Egg morphology and size, eggshell thickness, external ornamentation and internal microstructure, pore density and geometry, as well as morphology of the clutches (where this could be observed) are all similar among the four localities, allowing the assignment of the eggs to Megaloolithus cf. siruguei. Most egg occurrences are related to paleosols of variable chemical composition and maturity, developed within different parts of the floodplain. The nesting horizon from Tuştea was partially reconstructed on a 160 m 2 surface, allowing a thorough analysis of the taphonomy of the eggs and clutches. It has also yielded hatchling remains at different ontogenetic developmental stages, and even, more rarely, embryo remains as well. The bones occur in the vicinity of or even within the clutches; in a single case, incompletely ossified embryonic skeletal remains, including a dentary tooth, were found inside an incomplete egg. Without exception, the neonate remains belong to the basal hadrosaurid Telmatosaurus transsylvanicus, one of the common dinosaur species in the faunal assemblage. No sauropod neonate remains were found in the nesting horizon from Tuştea; only a fragmentary pelvic girdle and caudal vertebrae of an adult titanosaurian were unearthed recently 20 cm above the nesting horizon. None of the other three megaloolithid localities in the Haţeg Basin provided neonatal remains of any dinosaur species. Despite the general consensus that the Megaloolithus oogenus belongs exclusively to titanosaurian sauropods, the co-occurrence of megaloolithid eggs and hadrosaurid neonatal remains at Tuştea seems to contradict this view. Previous cladistic analyses of dinosauroid ootaxa might offer an explanation of this controversial issue. These analyses have revealed that Megaloolithidae appears to be the sister group of Spheroolithidae, usually regarded as a hadrosaurid egg family. Perhaps a significant amount of homoplasy is present in the evolution of dinosaurian eggs, whose structure depends on incubation environment as well as biology and physiology of the reproductive system itself, and that the oospecies of Megaloolithus might have been laid by different higher-level taxa, including both titanosaurian sauropods and (basal) hadrosaurids. Understanding the significance of this paraphyletic distribution requires further study.</abstract><pub>Elsevier B.V</pub><doi>10.1016/j.palaeo.2010.03.031</doi><tpages>15</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0031-0182
ispartof Palaeogeography, palaeoclimatology, palaeoecology, 2010-07, Vol.293 (3), p.360-374
issn 0031-0182
1872-616X
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_759311247
source Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete
subjects Basins
cladistics
Developmental stages
Eggs
Embryos
Haţeg Basin
Maastrichtian
Megaloolithidae
Neonates
Reproductive system
Spine
Teeth
Telmatosaurus
title Uppermost Cretaceous megaloolithid eggs from the Haţeg Basin, Romania, associated with hadrosaur hatchlings: Search for explanation
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-21T17%3A52%3A45IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Uppermost%20Cretaceous%20megaloolithid%20eggs%20from%20the%20Ha%C5%A3eg%20Basin,%20Romania,%20associated%20with%20hadrosaur%20hatchlings:%20Search%20for%20explanation&rft.jtitle=Palaeogeography,%20palaeoclimatology,%20palaeoecology&rft.au=Grigorescu,%20Dan&rft.date=2010-07-15&rft.volume=293&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=360&rft.epage=374&rft.pages=360-374&rft.issn=0031-0182&rft.eissn=1872-616X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.palaeo.2010.03.031&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E759311247%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=759311247&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=S0031018210001707&rfr_iscdi=true