Mitigation of cross-contamination in an aircraft cabin via localized exhaust

Most aircraft cabin ventilation designs currently use a 50% mix of fresh and recirculated, filtered air and supply approximately 8–10 l/s per person. In order to make the most efficient use of the air supply at hand, the 50% of cabin air that is exhausted from the aircraft should remove with it as m...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Building and environment 2010-09, Vol.45 (9), p.2015-2026
Hauptverfasser: Dygert, Ryan K., Dang, Thong Q.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 2026
container_issue 9
container_start_page 2015
container_title Building and environment
container_volume 45
creator Dygert, Ryan K.
Dang, Thong Q.
description Most aircraft cabin ventilation designs currently use a 50% mix of fresh and recirculated, filtered air and supply approximately 8–10 l/s per person. In order to make the most efficient use of the air supply at hand, the 50% of cabin air that is exhausted from the aircraft should remove with it as much contaminant from within the cabin as possible. This will thereby reduce cross-contamination among passengers and improve overall air quality. This study examines the use of localized suction orifices near and around the source occupant to unobtrusively ingest the individual’s thermal plume and exhaust it from the aircraft cabin before contaminants entrained in the plume can significantly mix with the bulk airflow. Through the use of Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD), various suction seat designs have been tested for their contaminant removal effectiveness and subsequent cross-contamination reduction. CFD results indicate significant improvements over conventional mixing air ventilation systems with a 40–50% decrease in passenger exposure predicted in a conventional coach-class seating arrangement.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.buildenv.2010.01.014
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_759311024</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0360132310000260</els_id><sourcerecordid>759311024</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c344t-ca78ffa56d6376873f9dcf814639004dd375010bcb29b8dad6b019f0489321a73</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFUE1LAzEUDKJgrf4F2Zunrckmze7eFPELKl4UvIW3-dBXtpuaZIv6602tnoWBB8PM8GYIOWV0xiiT58tZN2Jv7LCZVTSTlGWIPTJhTc1L2YiXfTKhXNKS8YofkqMYlzQbWy4mZPGACV8hoR8K7wodfIyl9kOCFQ47GocCMjDoAC4VGrrMbBCK3mvo8cuawn68wRjTMTlw0Ed78nun5Pnm-unqrlw83t5fXS5KzYVIpYa6cQ7m0khey_yka412DROSt5QKY3g9z0U63VVt1xgwsqOsdVQ0La8Y1HxKzna56-DfRxuTWmHUtu9hsH6Mqp63nDFaiayUO-VPsWCdWgdcQfhUjKrtemqp_tZT2_UUZRlb48XOaHOPDdqgokY7aGswWJ2U8fhfxDeoxXxy</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>759311024</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Mitigation of cross-contamination in an aircraft cabin via localized exhaust</title><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Dygert, Ryan K. ; Dang, Thong Q.</creator><creatorcontrib>Dygert, Ryan K. ; Dang, Thong Q.</creatorcontrib><description>Most aircraft cabin ventilation designs currently use a 50% mix of fresh and recirculated, filtered air and supply approximately 8–10 l/s per person. In order to make the most efficient use of the air supply at hand, the 50% of cabin air that is exhausted from the aircraft should remove with it as much contaminant from within the cabin as possible. This will thereby reduce cross-contamination among passengers and improve overall air quality. This study examines the use of localized suction orifices near and around the source occupant to unobtrusively ingest the individual’s thermal plume and exhaust it from the aircraft cabin before contaminants entrained in the plume can significantly mix with the bulk airflow. Through the use of Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD), various suction seat designs have been tested for their contaminant removal effectiveness and subsequent cross-contamination reduction. CFD results indicate significant improvements over conventional mixing air ventilation systems with a 40–50% decrease in passenger exposure predicted in a conventional coach-class seating arrangement.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0360-1323</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-684X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.buildenv.2010.01.014</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Aircraft cabin ; Contaminant removal ; Indoor air quality ; Local exhaust ; Personal ventilation</subject><ispartof>Building and environment, 2010-09, Vol.45 (9), p.2015-2026</ispartof><rights>2010 Elsevier Ltd</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c344t-ca78ffa56d6376873f9dcf814639004dd375010bcb29b8dad6b019f0489321a73</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c344t-ca78ffa56d6376873f9dcf814639004dd375010bcb29b8dad6b019f0489321a73</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0360132310000260$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,27901,27902,65306</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Dygert, Ryan K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dang, Thong Q.</creatorcontrib><title>Mitigation of cross-contamination in an aircraft cabin via localized exhaust</title><title>Building and environment</title><description>Most aircraft cabin ventilation designs currently use a 50% mix of fresh and recirculated, filtered air and supply approximately 8–10 l/s per person. In order to make the most efficient use of the air supply at hand, the 50% of cabin air that is exhausted from the aircraft should remove with it as much contaminant from within the cabin as possible. This will thereby reduce cross-contamination among passengers and improve overall air quality. This study examines the use of localized suction orifices near and around the source occupant to unobtrusively ingest the individual’s thermal plume and exhaust it from the aircraft cabin before contaminants entrained in the plume can significantly mix with the bulk airflow. Through the use of Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD), various suction seat designs have been tested for their contaminant removal effectiveness and subsequent cross-contamination reduction. CFD results indicate significant improvements over conventional mixing air ventilation systems with a 40–50% decrease in passenger exposure predicted in a conventional coach-class seating arrangement.</description><subject>Aircraft cabin</subject><subject>Contaminant removal</subject><subject>Indoor air quality</subject><subject>Local exhaust</subject><subject>Personal ventilation</subject><issn>0360-1323</issn><issn>1873-684X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2010</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFUE1LAzEUDKJgrf4F2Zunrckmze7eFPELKl4UvIW3-dBXtpuaZIv6602tnoWBB8PM8GYIOWV0xiiT58tZN2Jv7LCZVTSTlGWIPTJhTc1L2YiXfTKhXNKS8YofkqMYlzQbWy4mZPGACV8hoR8K7wodfIyl9kOCFQ47GocCMjDoAC4VGrrMbBCK3mvo8cuawn68wRjTMTlw0Ed78nun5Pnm-unqrlw83t5fXS5KzYVIpYa6cQ7m0khey_yka412DROSt5QKY3g9z0U63VVt1xgwsqOsdVQ0La8Y1HxKzna56-DfRxuTWmHUtu9hsH6Mqp63nDFaiayUO-VPsWCdWgdcQfhUjKrtemqp_tZT2_UUZRlb48XOaHOPDdqgokY7aGswWJ2U8fhfxDeoxXxy</recordid><startdate>20100901</startdate><enddate>20100901</enddate><creator>Dygert, Ryan K.</creator><creator>Dang, Thong Q.</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7TV</scope><scope>7U6</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>SOI</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20100901</creationdate><title>Mitigation of cross-contamination in an aircraft cabin via localized exhaust</title><author>Dygert, Ryan K. ; Dang, Thong Q.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c344t-ca78ffa56d6376873f9dcf814639004dd375010bcb29b8dad6b019f0489321a73</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2010</creationdate><topic>Aircraft cabin</topic><topic>Contaminant removal</topic><topic>Indoor air quality</topic><topic>Local exhaust</topic><topic>Personal ventilation</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Dygert, Ryan K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dang, Thong Q.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Pollution Abstracts</collection><collection>Sustainability Science Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Building and environment</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Dygert, Ryan K.</au><au>Dang, Thong Q.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Mitigation of cross-contamination in an aircraft cabin via localized exhaust</atitle><jtitle>Building and environment</jtitle><date>2010-09-01</date><risdate>2010</risdate><volume>45</volume><issue>9</issue><spage>2015</spage><epage>2026</epage><pages>2015-2026</pages><issn>0360-1323</issn><eissn>1873-684X</eissn><abstract>Most aircraft cabin ventilation designs currently use a 50% mix of fresh and recirculated, filtered air and supply approximately 8–10 l/s per person. In order to make the most efficient use of the air supply at hand, the 50% of cabin air that is exhausted from the aircraft should remove with it as much contaminant from within the cabin as possible. This will thereby reduce cross-contamination among passengers and improve overall air quality. This study examines the use of localized suction orifices near and around the source occupant to unobtrusively ingest the individual’s thermal plume and exhaust it from the aircraft cabin before contaminants entrained in the plume can significantly mix with the bulk airflow. Through the use of Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD), various suction seat designs have been tested for their contaminant removal effectiveness and subsequent cross-contamination reduction. CFD results indicate significant improvements over conventional mixing air ventilation systems with a 40–50% decrease in passenger exposure predicted in a conventional coach-class seating arrangement.</abstract><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><doi>10.1016/j.buildenv.2010.01.014</doi><tpages>12</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0360-1323
ispartof Building and environment, 2010-09, Vol.45 (9), p.2015-2026
issn 0360-1323
1873-684X
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_759311024
source Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals
subjects Aircraft cabin
Contaminant removal
Indoor air quality
Local exhaust
Personal ventilation
title Mitigation of cross-contamination in an aircraft cabin via localized exhaust
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-09T03%3A38%3A40IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Mitigation%20of%20cross-contamination%20in%20an%20aircraft%20cabin%20via%20localized%20exhaust&rft.jtitle=Building%20and%20environment&rft.au=Dygert,%20Ryan%20K.&rft.date=2010-09-01&rft.volume=45&rft.issue=9&rft.spage=2015&rft.epage=2026&rft.pages=2015-2026&rft.issn=0360-1323&rft.eissn=1873-684X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.buildenv.2010.01.014&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E759311024%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=759311024&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=S0360132310000260&rfr_iscdi=true