Mitigation of cross-contamination in an aircraft cabin via localized exhaust
Most aircraft cabin ventilation designs currently use a 50% mix of fresh and recirculated, filtered air and supply approximately 8–10 l/s per person. In order to make the most efficient use of the air supply at hand, the 50% of cabin air that is exhausted from the aircraft should remove with it as m...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Building and environment 2010-09, Vol.45 (9), p.2015-2026 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 2026 |
---|---|
container_issue | 9 |
container_start_page | 2015 |
container_title | Building and environment |
container_volume | 45 |
creator | Dygert, Ryan K. Dang, Thong Q. |
description | Most aircraft cabin ventilation designs currently use a 50% mix of fresh and recirculated, filtered air and supply approximately 8–10 l/s per person. In order to make the most efficient use of the air supply at hand, the 50% of cabin air that is exhausted from the aircraft should remove with it as much contaminant from within the cabin as possible. This will thereby reduce cross-contamination among passengers and improve overall air quality. This study examines the use of localized suction orifices near and around the source occupant to unobtrusively ingest the individual’s thermal plume and exhaust it from the aircraft cabin before contaminants entrained in the plume can significantly mix with the bulk airflow. Through the use of Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD), various suction seat designs have been tested for their contaminant removal effectiveness and subsequent cross-contamination reduction. CFD results indicate significant improvements over conventional mixing air ventilation systems with a 40–50% decrease in passenger exposure predicted in a conventional coach-class seating arrangement. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.buildenv.2010.01.014 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_759311024</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0360132310000260</els_id><sourcerecordid>759311024</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c344t-ca78ffa56d6376873f9dcf814639004dd375010bcb29b8dad6b019f0489321a73</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFUE1LAzEUDKJgrf4F2Zunrckmze7eFPELKl4UvIW3-dBXtpuaZIv6602tnoWBB8PM8GYIOWV0xiiT58tZN2Jv7LCZVTSTlGWIPTJhTc1L2YiXfTKhXNKS8YofkqMYlzQbWy4mZPGACV8hoR8K7wodfIyl9kOCFQ47GocCMjDoAC4VGrrMbBCK3mvo8cuawn68wRjTMTlw0Ed78nun5Pnm-unqrlw83t5fXS5KzYVIpYa6cQ7m0khey_yka412DROSt5QKY3g9z0U63VVt1xgwsqOsdVQ0La8Y1HxKzna56-DfRxuTWmHUtu9hsH6Mqp63nDFaiayUO-VPsWCdWgdcQfhUjKrtemqp_tZT2_UUZRlb48XOaHOPDdqgokY7aGswWJ2U8fhfxDeoxXxy</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>759311024</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Mitigation of cross-contamination in an aircraft cabin via localized exhaust</title><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Dygert, Ryan K. ; Dang, Thong Q.</creator><creatorcontrib>Dygert, Ryan K. ; Dang, Thong Q.</creatorcontrib><description>Most aircraft cabin ventilation designs currently use a 50% mix of fresh and recirculated, filtered air and supply approximately 8–10 l/s per person. In order to make the most efficient use of the air supply at hand, the 50% of cabin air that is exhausted from the aircraft should remove with it as much contaminant from within the cabin as possible. This will thereby reduce cross-contamination among passengers and improve overall air quality. This study examines the use of localized suction orifices near and around the source occupant to unobtrusively ingest the individual’s thermal plume and exhaust it from the aircraft cabin before contaminants entrained in the plume can significantly mix with the bulk airflow. Through the use of Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD), various suction seat designs have been tested for their contaminant removal effectiveness and subsequent cross-contamination reduction. CFD results indicate significant improvements over conventional mixing air ventilation systems with a 40–50% decrease in passenger exposure predicted in a conventional coach-class seating arrangement.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0360-1323</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-684X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.buildenv.2010.01.014</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Aircraft cabin ; Contaminant removal ; Indoor air quality ; Local exhaust ; Personal ventilation</subject><ispartof>Building and environment, 2010-09, Vol.45 (9), p.2015-2026</ispartof><rights>2010 Elsevier Ltd</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c344t-ca78ffa56d6376873f9dcf814639004dd375010bcb29b8dad6b019f0489321a73</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c344t-ca78ffa56d6376873f9dcf814639004dd375010bcb29b8dad6b019f0489321a73</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0360132310000260$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,27901,27902,65306</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Dygert, Ryan K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dang, Thong Q.</creatorcontrib><title>Mitigation of cross-contamination in an aircraft cabin via localized exhaust</title><title>Building and environment</title><description>Most aircraft cabin ventilation designs currently use a 50% mix of fresh and recirculated, filtered air and supply approximately 8–10 l/s per person. In order to make the most efficient use of the air supply at hand, the 50% of cabin air that is exhausted from the aircraft should remove with it as much contaminant from within the cabin as possible. This will thereby reduce cross-contamination among passengers and improve overall air quality. This study examines the use of localized suction orifices near and around the source occupant to unobtrusively ingest the individual’s thermal plume and exhaust it from the aircraft cabin before contaminants entrained in the plume can significantly mix with the bulk airflow. Through the use of Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD), various suction seat designs have been tested for their contaminant removal effectiveness and subsequent cross-contamination reduction. CFD results indicate significant improvements over conventional mixing air ventilation systems with a 40–50% decrease in passenger exposure predicted in a conventional coach-class seating arrangement.</description><subject>Aircraft cabin</subject><subject>Contaminant removal</subject><subject>Indoor air quality</subject><subject>Local exhaust</subject><subject>Personal ventilation</subject><issn>0360-1323</issn><issn>1873-684X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2010</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFUE1LAzEUDKJgrf4F2Zunrckmze7eFPELKl4UvIW3-dBXtpuaZIv6602tnoWBB8PM8GYIOWV0xiiT58tZN2Jv7LCZVTSTlGWIPTJhTc1L2YiXfTKhXNKS8YofkqMYlzQbWy4mZPGACV8hoR8K7wodfIyl9kOCFQ47GocCMjDoAC4VGrrMbBCK3mvo8cuawn68wRjTMTlw0Ed78nun5Pnm-unqrlw83t5fXS5KzYVIpYa6cQ7m0khey_yka412DROSt5QKY3g9z0U63VVt1xgwsqOsdVQ0La8Y1HxKzna56-DfRxuTWmHUtu9hsH6Mqp63nDFaiayUO-VPsWCdWgdcQfhUjKrtemqp_tZT2_UUZRlb48XOaHOPDdqgokY7aGswWJ2U8fhfxDeoxXxy</recordid><startdate>20100901</startdate><enddate>20100901</enddate><creator>Dygert, Ryan K.</creator><creator>Dang, Thong Q.</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7TV</scope><scope>7U6</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>SOI</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20100901</creationdate><title>Mitigation of cross-contamination in an aircraft cabin via localized exhaust</title><author>Dygert, Ryan K. ; Dang, Thong Q.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c344t-ca78ffa56d6376873f9dcf814639004dd375010bcb29b8dad6b019f0489321a73</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2010</creationdate><topic>Aircraft cabin</topic><topic>Contaminant removal</topic><topic>Indoor air quality</topic><topic>Local exhaust</topic><topic>Personal ventilation</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Dygert, Ryan K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dang, Thong Q.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Pollution Abstracts</collection><collection>Sustainability Science Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Building and environment</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Dygert, Ryan K.</au><au>Dang, Thong Q.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Mitigation of cross-contamination in an aircraft cabin via localized exhaust</atitle><jtitle>Building and environment</jtitle><date>2010-09-01</date><risdate>2010</risdate><volume>45</volume><issue>9</issue><spage>2015</spage><epage>2026</epage><pages>2015-2026</pages><issn>0360-1323</issn><eissn>1873-684X</eissn><abstract>Most aircraft cabin ventilation designs currently use a 50% mix of fresh and recirculated, filtered air and supply approximately 8–10 l/s per person. In order to make the most efficient use of the air supply at hand, the 50% of cabin air that is exhausted from the aircraft should remove with it as much contaminant from within the cabin as possible. This will thereby reduce cross-contamination among passengers and improve overall air quality. This study examines the use of localized suction orifices near and around the source occupant to unobtrusively ingest the individual’s thermal plume and exhaust it from the aircraft cabin before contaminants entrained in the plume can significantly mix with the bulk airflow. Through the use of Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD), various suction seat designs have been tested for their contaminant removal effectiveness and subsequent cross-contamination reduction. CFD results indicate significant improvements over conventional mixing air ventilation systems with a 40–50% decrease in passenger exposure predicted in a conventional coach-class seating arrangement.</abstract><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><doi>10.1016/j.buildenv.2010.01.014</doi><tpages>12</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0360-1323 |
ispartof | Building and environment, 2010-09, Vol.45 (9), p.2015-2026 |
issn | 0360-1323 1873-684X |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_759311024 |
source | Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals |
subjects | Aircraft cabin Contaminant removal Indoor air quality Local exhaust Personal ventilation |
title | Mitigation of cross-contamination in an aircraft cabin via localized exhaust |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-09T03%3A38%3A40IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Mitigation%20of%20cross-contamination%20in%20an%20aircraft%20cabin%20via%20localized%20exhaust&rft.jtitle=Building%20and%20environment&rft.au=Dygert,%20Ryan%20K.&rft.date=2010-09-01&rft.volume=45&rft.issue=9&rft.spage=2015&rft.epage=2026&rft.pages=2015-2026&rft.issn=0360-1323&rft.eissn=1873-684X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.buildenv.2010.01.014&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E759311024%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=759311024&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=S0360132310000260&rfr_iscdi=true |