Effects of habitat structure and tidal height on epifaunal assemblages associated with macroalgae
Patterns of distribution and abundance of epifauna often differ markedly among macroalgal species. The hypotheses tested were that (1) assemblages of mobile epifauna associated with Laminaria ochroleuca and Sargassum muticum differed because they have different structure, and (2) assemblages of mobi...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Estuarine, coastal and shelf science coastal and shelf science, 2010-09, Vol.89 (1), p.43-52 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 52 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 43 |
container_title | Estuarine, coastal and shelf science |
container_volume | 89 |
creator | Cacabelos, Eva Olabarria, Celia Incera, Mónica Troncoso, Jesús S. |
description | Patterns of distribution and abundance of epifauna often differ markedly among macroalgal species. The hypotheses tested were that (1) assemblages of mobile epifauna associated with
Laminaria ochroleuca and
Sargassum muticum differed because they have different structure, and (2) assemblages of mobile epifauna associated with
S. muticum differed between heights on the shore because tidal height affects physical and biological conditions. We also investigated the effect of epiphytic biomass on the composition of epifaunal assemblages. Hypotheses were tested with measuring and manipulative experiments using natural and artificial algae, and by measuring uni- and multivariate assemblage descriptors. The results indicated that epifaunal assemblages associated with natural
L. ochroleuca and
S. muticum differed, but only differences in epifaunal densities were likely to be related to the structure of algae since all other variables did not clearly differ between the two algae. Although structure might play an important role, other factors need to be taken into account and further experimental tests are necessary. Epifaunal assemblages associated with
S. muticum did vary depending on the height on the shore, but inconsistently over time in the case of natural algae. In addition, epifaunal densities of natural algae were positively related to biomass of epiphytes in both species. Time of sampling, epiphytic load and height on the shore were the most important factors in structuring epifaunal assemblages rather than complexity of the host algae. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.ecss.2010.05.012 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_759310719</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0272771410002052</els_id><sourcerecordid>759310719</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c362t-b52c6907ad07703cd3d0029631669e8f9f896b1456c0ea40297204e5c956989a3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kE1vEzEQhi1EJULLH-DkC-K06dhe27HEBVUtVKrUC5ytiXecONrsBtsL4t_jKBXHnmb0zjtfD2MfBawFCHN7WFMoZS2hCaDXIOQbthLgTAcg9Fu2AmllZ63o37H3pRyaKrSSK4b3MVKohc-R73GbKlZeal5CXTJxnAZe04Aj31Pa7SufJ06nFHGZmoal0HE74o7KOZ9DwkoD_5Pqnh8x5BnHHdINu4o4FvrwEq_Zz4f7H3ffu6fnb493X5-6oIys3VbLYBxYHMBaUGFQA4B0RgljHG2iixtntqLXJgBh30pWQk86OG3cxqG6Zp8vc095_rVQqf6YSqBxxInmpXirnRJghWtOeXG2E0vJFP0ppyPmv16AP-P0B3_G6c84PWjfcLamTy_jsQQcY8YppPK_UyrQTqq--b5cfNR-_Z0o-xISTYGGlBtoP8zptTX_AJZziwU</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>759310719</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Effects of habitat structure and tidal height on epifaunal assemblages associated with macroalgae</title><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Cacabelos, Eva ; Olabarria, Celia ; Incera, Mónica ; Troncoso, Jesús S.</creator><creatorcontrib>Cacabelos, Eva ; Olabarria, Celia ; Incera, Mónica ; Troncoso, Jesús S.</creatorcontrib><description>Patterns of distribution and abundance of epifauna often differ markedly among macroalgal species. The hypotheses tested were that (1) assemblages of mobile epifauna associated with
Laminaria ochroleuca and
Sargassum muticum differed because they have different structure, and (2) assemblages of mobile epifauna associated with
S. muticum differed between heights on the shore because tidal height affects physical and biological conditions. We also investigated the effect of epiphytic biomass on the composition of epifaunal assemblages. Hypotheses were tested with measuring and manipulative experiments using natural and artificial algae, and by measuring uni- and multivariate assemblage descriptors. The results indicated that epifaunal assemblages associated with natural
L. ochroleuca and
S. muticum differed, but only differences in epifaunal densities were likely to be related to the structure of algae since all other variables did not clearly differ between the two algae. Although structure might play an important role, other factors need to be taken into account and further experimental tests are necessary. Epifaunal assemblages associated with
S. muticum did vary depending on the height on the shore, but inconsistently over time in the case of natural algae. In addition, epifaunal densities of natural algae were positively related to biomass of epiphytes in both species. Time of sampling, epiphytic load and height on the shore were the most important factors in structuring epifaunal assemblages rather than complexity of the host algae.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0272-7714</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1096-0015</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.ecss.2010.05.012</identifier><identifier>CODEN: ECSSD3</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Kidlington: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Abundance ; Algae ; Animal and plant ecology ; Animal, plant and microbial ecology ; Biological and medical sciences ; Biomass ; Brackish ; Brackish water ecosystems ; Composition effects ; Density ; epiphytes ; Estuaries ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; habitat structure ; height on the shore ; Hypotheses ; macroalgae ; mobile epifauna ; natural and artificial algae ; Sampling ; Shores ; Synecology</subject><ispartof>Estuarine, coastal and shelf science, 2010-09, Vol.89 (1), p.43-52</ispartof><rights>2010 Elsevier Ltd</rights><rights>2015 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c362t-b52c6907ad07703cd3d0029631669e8f9f896b1456c0ea40297204e5c956989a3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c362t-b52c6907ad07703cd3d0029631669e8f9f896b1456c0ea40297204e5c956989a3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0272771410002052$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,27901,27902,65306</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=23059234$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Cacabelos, Eva</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Olabarria, Celia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Incera, Mónica</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Troncoso, Jesús S.</creatorcontrib><title>Effects of habitat structure and tidal height on epifaunal assemblages associated with macroalgae</title><title>Estuarine, coastal and shelf science</title><description>Patterns of distribution and abundance of epifauna often differ markedly among macroalgal species. The hypotheses tested were that (1) assemblages of mobile epifauna associated with
Laminaria ochroleuca and
Sargassum muticum differed because they have different structure, and (2) assemblages of mobile epifauna associated with
S. muticum differed between heights on the shore because tidal height affects physical and biological conditions. We also investigated the effect of epiphytic biomass on the composition of epifaunal assemblages. Hypotheses were tested with measuring and manipulative experiments using natural and artificial algae, and by measuring uni- and multivariate assemblage descriptors. The results indicated that epifaunal assemblages associated with natural
L. ochroleuca and
S. muticum differed, but only differences in epifaunal densities were likely to be related to the structure of algae since all other variables did not clearly differ between the two algae. Although structure might play an important role, other factors need to be taken into account and further experimental tests are necessary. Epifaunal assemblages associated with
S. muticum did vary depending on the height on the shore, but inconsistently over time in the case of natural algae. In addition, epifaunal densities of natural algae were positively related to biomass of epiphytes in both species. Time of sampling, epiphytic load and height on the shore were the most important factors in structuring epifaunal assemblages rather than complexity of the host algae.</description><subject>Abundance</subject><subject>Algae</subject><subject>Animal and plant ecology</subject><subject>Animal, plant and microbial ecology</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Biomass</subject><subject>Brackish</subject><subject>Brackish water ecosystems</subject><subject>Composition effects</subject><subject>Density</subject><subject>epiphytes</subject><subject>Estuaries</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>habitat structure</subject><subject>height on the shore</subject><subject>Hypotheses</subject><subject>macroalgae</subject><subject>mobile epifauna</subject><subject>natural and artificial algae</subject><subject>Sampling</subject><subject>Shores</subject><subject>Synecology</subject><issn>0272-7714</issn><issn>1096-0015</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2010</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kE1vEzEQhi1EJULLH-DkC-K06dhe27HEBVUtVKrUC5ytiXecONrsBtsL4t_jKBXHnmb0zjtfD2MfBawFCHN7WFMoZS2hCaDXIOQbthLgTAcg9Fu2AmllZ63o37H3pRyaKrSSK4b3MVKohc-R73GbKlZeal5CXTJxnAZe04Aj31Pa7SufJ06nFHGZmoal0HE74o7KOZ9DwkoD_5Pqnh8x5BnHHdINu4o4FvrwEq_Zz4f7H3ffu6fnb493X5-6oIys3VbLYBxYHMBaUGFQA4B0RgljHG2iixtntqLXJgBh30pWQk86OG3cxqG6Zp8vc095_rVQqf6YSqBxxInmpXirnRJghWtOeXG2E0vJFP0ppyPmv16AP-P0B3_G6c84PWjfcLamTy_jsQQcY8YppPK_UyrQTqq--b5cfNR-_Z0o-xISTYGGlBtoP8zptTX_AJZziwU</recordid><startdate>20100901</startdate><enddate>20100901</enddate><creator>Cacabelos, Eva</creator><creator>Olabarria, Celia</creator><creator>Incera, Mónica</creator><creator>Troncoso, Jesús S.</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Elsevier</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>KR7</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20100901</creationdate><title>Effects of habitat structure and tidal height on epifaunal assemblages associated with macroalgae</title><author>Cacabelos, Eva ; Olabarria, Celia ; Incera, Mónica ; Troncoso, Jesús S.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c362t-b52c6907ad07703cd3d0029631669e8f9f896b1456c0ea40297204e5c956989a3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2010</creationdate><topic>Abundance</topic><topic>Algae</topic><topic>Animal and plant ecology</topic><topic>Animal, plant and microbial ecology</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Biomass</topic><topic>Brackish</topic><topic>Brackish water ecosystems</topic><topic>Composition effects</topic><topic>Density</topic><topic>epiphytes</topic><topic>Estuaries</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>habitat structure</topic><topic>height on the shore</topic><topic>Hypotheses</topic><topic>macroalgae</topic><topic>mobile epifauna</topic><topic>natural and artificial algae</topic><topic>Sampling</topic><topic>Shores</topic><topic>Synecology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Cacabelos, Eva</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Olabarria, Celia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Incera, Mónica</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Troncoso, Jesús S.</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Estuarine, coastal and shelf science</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Cacabelos, Eva</au><au>Olabarria, Celia</au><au>Incera, Mónica</au><au>Troncoso, Jesús S.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Effects of habitat structure and tidal height on epifaunal assemblages associated with macroalgae</atitle><jtitle>Estuarine, coastal and shelf science</jtitle><date>2010-09-01</date><risdate>2010</risdate><volume>89</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>43</spage><epage>52</epage><pages>43-52</pages><issn>0272-7714</issn><eissn>1096-0015</eissn><coden>ECSSD3</coden><abstract>Patterns of distribution and abundance of epifauna often differ markedly among macroalgal species. The hypotheses tested were that (1) assemblages of mobile epifauna associated with
Laminaria ochroleuca and
Sargassum muticum differed because they have different structure, and (2) assemblages of mobile epifauna associated with
S. muticum differed between heights on the shore because tidal height affects physical and biological conditions. We also investigated the effect of epiphytic biomass on the composition of epifaunal assemblages. Hypotheses were tested with measuring and manipulative experiments using natural and artificial algae, and by measuring uni- and multivariate assemblage descriptors. The results indicated that epifaunal assemblages associated with natural
L. ochroleuca and
S. muticum differed, but only differences in epifaunal densities were likely to be related to the structure of algae since all other variables did not clearly differ between the two algae. Although structure might play an important role, other factors need to be taken into account and further experimental tests are necessary. Epifaunal assemblages associated with
S. muticum did vary depending on the height on the shore, but inconsistently over time in the case of natural algae. In addition, epifaunal densities of natural algae were positively related to biomass of epiphytes in both species. Time of sampling, epiphytic load and height on the shore were the most important factors in structuring epifaunal assemblages rather than complexity of the host algae.</abstract><cop>Kidlington</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><doi>10.1016/j.ecss.2010.05.012</doi><tpages>10</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0272-7714 |
ispartof | Estuarine, coastal and shelf science, 2010-09, Vol.89 (1), p.43-52 |
issn | 0272-7714 1096-0015 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_759310719 |
source | Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals |
subjects | Abundance Algae Animal and plant ecology Animal, plant and microbial ecology Biological and medical sciences Biomass Brackish Brackish water ecosystems Composition effects Density epiphytes Estuaries Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology habitat structure height on the shore Hypotheses macroalgae mobile epifauna natural and artificial algae Sampling Shores Synecology |
title | Effects of habitat structure and tidal height on epifaunal assemblages associated with macroalgae |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-04T05%3A01%3A28IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Effects%20of%20habitat%20structure%20and%20tidal%20height%20on%20epifaunal%20assemblages%20associated%20with%20macroalgae&rft.jtitle=Estuarine,%20coastal%20and%20shelf%20science&rft.au=Cacabelos,%20Eva&rft.date=2010-09-01&rft.volume=89&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=43&rft.epage=52&rft.pages=43-52&rft.issn=0272-7714&rft.eissn=1096-0015&rft.coden=ECSSD3&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.ecss.2010.05.012&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E759310719%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=759310719&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=S0272771410002052&rfr_iscdi=true |