Uncertainty assessment through a precipitation dependent hydrologic uncertainty processor: An application to a small catchment in southern Italy
Adequate assessment of uncertainty for prediction and simulation purposes is a current issue in hydrological research. This article describes the application of the Hydrologic Uncertainty Processor (HUP) proposed by Krzystofowicz in 1999 to a small semi-arid watershed in southern Italy. The version...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of hydrology (Amsterdam) 2010-05, Vol.386 (1), p.38-54 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 54 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 38 |
container_title | Journal of hydrology (Amsterdam) |
container_volume | 386 |
creator | Biondi, Daniela Versace, Pasquale Sirangelo, Beniamino |
description | Adequate assessment of uncertainty for prediction and simulation purposes is a current issue in hydrological research. This article describes the application of the Hydrologic Uncertainty Processor (HUP) proposed by Krzystofowicz in 1999 to a small semi-arid watershed in southern Italy. The version applied in this work is a precipitation-dependent HUP aimed at assessing the hydrologic uncertainty about actual streamflow at some future time, with lead times of a few hours, given the information available at the forecast time and assuming a perfectly known amount of precipitation. The processor is based on Bayes theorem and hence models the prior and likelihood functions to obtain the revised posterior distribution.
A complete example of the modelling assumptions, estimation procedure and results is carried out in the present paper. In detail, we analysed a 26-km
2 semi-arid basin, considering hourly forecasts over an almost continuous five-year period in 2000–2005. A distributed rainfall–runoff model suited to represent contributions of different runoff generation mechanisms to hydrologic response is used for deterministic predictions. Analysis of the resulting posterior distributions show that hydrologic uncertainty: (i) grows with the value of discharge predicted by the model; (ii) is higher when associated with high precipitation amounts; and (iii) increases with lead time of predictions. The predictive ability of the processor is investigated for several runoff events. The results indicate good processor performance for a lead time equal to the period covered by the precipitation forecast, and a significant deterioration for higher lead times that is heavily dominated by the presumption of null precipitation beyond the forecast period. Finally, the skill of the processor is assessed through a retrospective analysis in terms of the probability of detection and the false-alarm rate. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2010.03.004 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_759307653</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0022169410001307</els_id><sourcerecordid>759307653</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a418t-410a378c371db03c25336b8bd32d979013b24f08f4f422db9629fa21fd7c59fc3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkc1qGzEUhUVpoK7TRyjVpnQ1rn7Go1E3JYQ2CQSyaL0WGv14ZGRpKmkCfos8cuWOKd1VG8HlO-dc7gHgPUYbjHD3-bA5jCedot8QVGeIbhBqX4EV7hlvCEPsNVghREiDO96-AW9zPqD6KG1X4GUXlElFulBOUOZscj6aUGAZU5z3I5RwSka5yRVZXAxQm8kEfSaWyLh3Cs7_eEwpqmoS0xd4E6CcJu_UIi2xuuWj9B7WiRr_5LgAc5zLaFKAD0X60zW4stJn8-7yr8Hu-7eft_fN49Pdw-3NYyNb3JemxUhS1ivKsB4QVWRLaTf0g6ZEc8YRpgNpLepta1tC9MA7wq0k2GqmttwqugafFt-68K_Z5CKOLivjvQwmzlmwLaeIddV2DbYLqVLMORkrpuSOMp0ERuJcgDiISwHiXIBAVNQCqu7jJUFmJb1NMiiX_4oJ6QkntKvch4WzMgq5T5XZ_ahGFOGeMt6zSnxdCFMP8uxMElk5U4-uXS2nCB3df3b5DTkIq8A</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>759307653</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Uncertainty assessment through a precipitation dependent hydrologic uncertainty processor: An application to a small catchment in southern Italy</title><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Biondi, Daniela ; Versace, Pasquale ; Sirangelo, Beniamino</creator><creatorcontrib>Biondi, Daniela ; Versace, Pasquale ; Sirangelo, Beniamino</creatorcontrib><description>Adequate assessment of uncertainty for prediction and simulation purposes is a current issue in hydrological research. This article describes the application of the Hydrologic Uncertainty Processor (HUP) proposed by Krzystofowicz in 1999 to a small semi-arid watershed in southern Italy. The version applied in this work is a precipitation-dependent HUP aimed at assessing the hydrologic uncertainty about actual streamflow at some future time, with lead times of a few hours, given the information available at the forecast time and assuming a perfectly known amount of precipitation. The processor is based on Bayes theorem and hence models the prior and likelihood functions to obtain the revised posterior distribution.
A complete example of the modelling assumptions, estimation procedure and results is carried out in the present paper. In detail, we analysed a 26-km
2 semi-arid basin, considering hourly forecasts over an almost continuous five-year period in 2000–2005. A distributed rainfall–runoff model suited to represent contributions of different runoff generation mechanisms to hydrologic response is used for deterministic predictions. Analysis of the resulting posterior distributions show that hydrologic uncertainty: (i) grows with the value of discharge predicted by the model; (ii) is higher when associated with high precipitation amounts; and (iii) increases with lead time of predictions. The predictive ability of the processor is investigated for several runoff events. The results indicate good processor performance for a lead time equal to the period covered by the precipitation forecast, and a significant deterioration for higher lead times that is heavily dominated by the presumption of null precipitation beyond the forecast period. Finally, the skill of the processor is assessed through a retrospective analysis in terms of the probability of detection and the false-alarm rate.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0022-1694</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1879-2707</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2010.03.004</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JHYDA7</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Kidlington: Elsevier B.V</publisher><subject>Assessments ; Bayes theorem ; Earth sciences ; Earth, ocean, space ; Exact sciences and technology ; Freshwater ; hydrologic models ; Hydrologic uncertainty ; Hydrologic Uncertainy Processor ; Hydrology ; Hydrology. Hydrogeology ; Lead time ; Mathematical models ; Microprocessors ; Precipitation ; rain ; Rainfall–runoff modelling ; Runoff ; semiarid zones ; simulation models ; Uncertainty ; watershed hydrology ; Watersheds</subject><ispartof>Journal of hydrology (Amsterdam), 2010-05, Vol.386 (1), p.38-54</ispartof><rights>2010 Elsevier B.V.</rights><rights>2015 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a418t-410a378c371db03c25336b8bd32d979013b24f08f4f422db9629fa21fd7c59fc3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-a418t-410a378c371db03c25336b8bd32d979013b24f08f4f422db9629fa21fd7c59fc3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022169410001307$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,27901,27902,65306</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=22829236$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Biondi, Daniela</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Versace, Pasquale</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sirangelo, Beniamino</creatorcontrib><title>Uncertainty assessment through a precipitation dependent hydrologic uncertainty processor: An application to a small catchment in southern Italy</title><title>Journal of hydrology (Amsterdam)</title><description>Adequate assessment of uncertainty for prediction and simulation purposes is a current issue in hydrological research. This article describes the application of the Hydrologic Uncertainty Processor (HUP) proposed by Krzystofowicz in 1999 to a small semi-arid watershed in southern Italy. The version applied in this work is a precipitation-dependent HUP aimed at assessing the hydrologic uncertainty about actual streamflow at some future time, with lead times of a few hours, given the information available at the forecast time and assuming a perfectly known amount of precipitation. The processor is based on Bayes theorem and hence models the prior and likelihood functions to obtain the revised posterior distribution.
A complete example of the modelling assumptions, estimation procedure and results is carried out in the present paper. In detail, we analysed a 26-km
2 semi-arid basin, considering hourly forecasts over an almost continuous five-year period in 2000–2005. A distributed rainfall–runoff model suited to represent contributions of different runoff generation mechanisms to hydrologic response is used for deterministic predictions. Analysis of the resulting posterior distributions show that hydrologic uncertainty: (i) grows with the value of discharge predicted by the model; (ii) is higher when associated with high precipitation amounts; and (iii) increases with lead time of predictions. The predictive ability of the processor is investigated for several runoff events. The results indicate good processor performance for a lead time equal to the period covered by the precipitation forecast, and a significant deterioration for higher lead times that is heavily dominated by the presumption of null precipitation beyond the forecast period. Finally, the skill of the processor is assessed through a retrospective analysis in terms of the probability of detection and the false-alarm rate.</description><subject>Assessments</subject><subject>Bayes theorem</subject><subject>Earth sciences</subject><subject>Earth, ocean, space</subject><subject>Exact sciences and technology</subject><subject>Freshwater</subject><subject>hydrologic models</subject><subject>Hydrologic uncertainty</subject><subject>Hydrologic Uncertainy Processor</subject><subject>Hydrology</subject><subject>Hydrology. Hydrogeology</subject><subject>Lead time</subject><subject>Mathematical models</subject><subject>Microprocessors</subject><subject>Precipitation</subject><subject>rain</subject><subject>Rainfall–runoff modelling</subject><subject>Runoff</subject><subject>semiarid zones</subject><subject>simulation models</subject><subject>Uncertainty</subject><subject>watershed hydrology</subject><subject>Watersheds</subject><issn>0022-1694</issn><issn>1879-2707</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2010</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkc1qGzEUhUVpoK7TRyjVpnQ1rn7Go1E3JYQ2CQSyaL0WGv14ZGRpKmkCfos8cuWOKd1VG8HlO-dc7gHgPUYbjHD3-bA5jCedot8QVGeIbhBqX4EV7hlvCEPsNVghREiDO96-AW9zPqD6KG1X4GUXlElFulBOUOZscj6aUGAZU5z3I5RwSka5yRVZXAxQm8kEfSaWyLh3Cs7_eEwpqmoS0xd4E6CcJu_UIi2xuuWj9B7WiRr_5LgAc5zLaFKAD0X60zW4stJn8-7yr8Hu-7eft_fN49Pdw-3NYyNb3JemxUhS1ivKsB4QVWRLaTf0g6ZEc8YRpgNpLepta1tC9MA7wq0k2GqmttwqugafFt-68K_Z5CKOLivjvQwmzlmwLaeIddV2DbYLqVLMORkrpuSOMp0ERuJcgDiISwHiXIBAVNQCqu7jJUFmJb1NMiiX_4oJ6QkntKvch4WzMgq5T5XZ_ahGFOGeMt6zSnxdCFMP8uxMElk5U4-uXS2nCB3df3b5DTkIq8A</recordid><startdate>20100528</startdate><enddate>20100528</enddate><creator>Biondi, Daniela</creator><creator>Versace, Pasquale</creator><creator>Sirangelo, Beniamino</creator><general>Elsevier B.V</general><general>[Amsterdam; New York]: Elsevier</general><general>Elsevier</general><scope>FBQ</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>KR7</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20100528</creationdate><title>Uncertainty assessment through a precipitation dependent hydrologic uncertainty processor: An application to a small catchment in southern Italy</title><author>Biondi, Daniela ; Versace, Pasquale ; Sirangelo, Beniamino</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a418t-410a378c371db03c25336b8bd32d979013b24f08f4f422db9629fa21fd7c59fc3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2010</creationdate><topic>Assessments</topic><topic>Bayes theorem</topic><topic>Earth sciences</topic><topic>Earth, ocean, space</topic><topic>Exact sciences and technology</topic><topic>Freshwater</topic><topic>hydrologic models</topic><topic>Hydrologic uncertainty</topic><topic>Hydrologic Uncertainy Processor</topic><topic>Hydrology</topic><topic>Hydrology. Hydrogeology</topic><topic>Lead time</topic><topic>Mathematical models</topic><topic>Microprocessors</topic><topic>Precipitation</topic><topic>rain</topic><topic>Rainfall–runoff modelling</topic><topic>Runoff</topic><topic>semiarid zones</topic><topic>simulation models</topic><topic>Uncertainty</topic><topic>watershed hydrology</topic><topic>Watersheds</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Biondi, Daniela</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Versace, Pasquale</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sirangelo, Beniamino</creatorcontrib><collection>AGRIS</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Journal of hydrology (Amsterdam)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Biondi, Daniela</au><au>Versace, Pasquale</au><au>Sirangelo, Beniamino</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Uncertainty assessment through a precipitation dependent hydrologic uncertainty processor: An application to a small catchment in southern Italy</atitle><jtitle>Journal of hydrology (Amsterdam)</jtitle><date>2010-05-28</date><risdate>2010</risdate><volume>386</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>38</spage><epage>54</epage><pages>38-54</pages><issn>0022-1694</issn><eissn>1879-2707</eissn><coden>JHYDA7</coden><abstract>Adequate assessment of uncertainty for prediction and simulation purposes is a current issue in hydrological research. This article describes the application of the Hydrologic Uncertainty Processor (HUP) proposed by Krzystofowicz in 1999 to a small semi-arid watershed in southern Italy. The version applied in this work is a precipitation-dependent HUP aimed at assessing the hydrologic uncertainty about actual streamflow at some future time, with lead times of a few hours, given the information available at the forecast time and assuming a perfectly known amount of precipitation. The processor is based on Bayes theorem and hence models the prior and likelihood functions to obtain the revised posterior distribution.
A complete example of the modelling assumptions, estimation procedure and results is carried out in the present paper. In detail, we analysed a 26-km
2 semi-arid basin, considering hourly forecasts over an almost continuous five-year period in 2000–2005. A distributed rainfall–runoff model suited to represent contributions of different runoff generation mechanisms to hydrologic response is used for deterministic predictions. Analysis of the resulting posterior distributions show that hydrologic uncertainty: (i) grows with the value of discharge predicted by the model; (ii) is higher when associated with high precipitation amounts; and (iii) increases with lead time of predictions. The predictive ability of the processor is investigated for several runoff events. The results indicate good processor performance for a lead time equal to the period covered by the precipitation forecast, and a significant deterioration for higher lead times that is heavily dominated by the presumption of null precipitation beyond the forecast period. Finally, the skill of the processor is assessed through a retrospective analysis in terms of the probability of detection and the false-alarm rate.</abstract><cop>Kidlington</cop><pub>Elsevier B.V</pub><doi>10.1016/j.jhydrol.2010.03.004</doi><tpages>17</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0022-1694 |
ispartof | Journal of hydrology (Amsterdam), 2010-05, Vol.386 (1), p.38-54 |
issn | 0022-1694 1879-2707 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_759307653 |
source | Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals |
subjects | Assessments Bayes theorem Earth sciences Earth, ocean, space Exact sciences and technology Freshwater hydrologic models Hydrologic uncertainty Hydrologic Uncertainy Processor Hydrology Hydrology. Hydrogeology Lead time Mathematical models Microprocessors Precipitation rain Rainfall–runoff modelling Runoff semiarid zones simulation models Uncertainty watershed hydrology Watersheds |
title | Uncertainty assessment through a precipitation dependent hydrologic uncertainty processor: An application to a small catchment in southern Italy |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-28T18%3A59%3A12IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Uncertainty%20assessment%20through%20a%20precipitation%20dependent%20hydrologic%20uncertainty%20processor:%20An%20application%20to%20a%20small%20catchment%20in%20southern%20Italy&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20hydrology%20(Amsterdam)&rft.au=Biondi,%20Daniela&rft.date=2010-05-28&rft.volume=386&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=38&rft.epage=54&rft.pages=38-54&rft.issn=0022-1694&rft.eissn=1879-2707&rft.coden=JHYDA7&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2010.03.004&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E759307653%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=759307653&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=S0022169410001307&rfr_iscdi=true |