Uncertainty assessment through a precipitation dependent hydrologic uncertainty processor: An application to a small catchment in southern Italy

Adequate assessment of uncertainty for prediction and simulation purposes is a current issue in hydrological research. This article describes the application of the Hydrologic Uncertainty Processor (HUP) proposed by Krzystofowicz in 1999 to a small semi-arid watershed in southern Italy. The version...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of hydrology (Amsterdam) 2010-05, Vol.386 (1), p.38-54
Hauptverfasser: Biondi, Daniela, Versace, Pasquale, Sirangelo, Beniamino
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 54
container_issue 1
container_start_page 38
container_title Journal of hydrology (Amsterdam)
container_volume 386
creator Biondi, Daniela
Versace, Pasquale
Sirangelo, Beniamino
description Adequate assessment of uncertainty for prediction and simulation purposes is a current issue in hydrological research. This article describes the application of the Hydrologic Uncertainty Processor (HUP) proposed by Krzystofowicz in 1999 to a small semi-arid watershed in southern Italy. The version applied in this work is a precipitation-dependent HUP aimed at assessing the hydrologic uncertainty about actual streamflow at some future time, with lead times of a few hours, given the information available at the forecast time and assuming a perfectly known amount of precipitation. The processor is based on Bayes theorem and hence models the prior and likelihood functions to obtain the revised posterior distribution. A complete example of the modelling assumptions, estimation procedure and results is carried out in the present paper. In detail, we analysed a 26-km 2 semi-arid basin, considering hourly forecasts over an almost continuous five-year period in 2000–2005. A distributed rainfall–runoff model suited to represent contributions of different runoff generation mechanisms to hydrologic response is used for deterministic predictions. Analysis of the resulting posterior distributions show that hydrologic uncertainty: (i) grows with the value of discharge predicted by the model; (ii) is higher when associated with high precipitation amounts; and (iii) increases with lead time of predictions. The predictive ability of the processor is investigated for several runoff events. The results indicate good processor performance for a lead time equal to the period covered by the precipitation forecast, and a significant deterioration for higher lead times that is heavily dominated by the presumption of null precipitation beyond the forecast period. Finally, the skill of the processor is assessed through a retrospective analysis in terms of the probability of detection and the false-alarm rate.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2010.03.004
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_759307653</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0022169410001307</els_id><sourcerecordid>759307653</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a418t-410a378c371db03c25336b8bd32d979013b24f08f4f422db9629fa21fd7c59fc3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkc1qGzEUhUVpoK7TRyjVpnQ1rn7Go1E3JYQ2CQSyaL0WGv14ZGRpKmkCfos8cuWOKd1VG8HlO-dc7gHgPUYbjHD3-bA5jCedot8QVGeIbhBqX4EV7hlvCEPsNVghREiDO96-AW9zPqD6KG1X4GUXlElFulBOUOZscj6aUGAZU5z3I5RwSka5yRVZXAxQm8kEfSaWyLh3Cs7_eEwpqmoS0xd4E6CcJu_UIi2xuuWj9B7WiRr_5LgAc5zLaFKAD0X60zW4stJn8-7yr8Hu-7eft_fN49Pdw-3NYyNb3JemxUhS1ivKsB4QVWRLaTf0g6ZEc8YRpgNpLepta1tC9MA7wq0k2GqmttwqugafFt-68K_Z5CKOLivjvQwmzlmwLaeIddV2DbYLqVLMORkrpuSOMp0ERuJcgDiISwHiXIBAVNQCqu7jJUFmJb1NMiiX_4oJ6QkntKvch4WzMgq5T5XZ_ahGFOGeMt6zSnxdCFMP8uxMElk5U4-uXS2nCB3df3b5DTkIq8A</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>759307653</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Uncertainty assessment through a precipitation dependent hydrologic uncertainty processor: An application to a small catchment in southern Italy</title><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Biondi, Daniela ; Versace, Pasquale ; Sirangelo, Beniamino</creator><creatorcontrib>Biondi, Daniela ; Versace, Pasquale ; Sirangelo, Beniamino</creatorcontrib><description>Adequate assessment of uncertainty for prediction and simulation purposes is a current issue in hydrological research. This article describes the application of the Hydrologic Uncertainty Processor (HUP) proposed by Krzystofowicz in 1999 to a small semi-arid watershed in southern Italy. The version applied in this work is a precipitation-dependent HUP aimed at assessing the hydrologic uncertainty about actual streamflow at some future time, with lead times of a few hours, given the information available at the forecast time and assuming a perfectly known amount of precipitation. The processor is based on Bayes theorem and hence models the prior and likelihood functions to obtain the revised posterior distribution. A complete example of the modelling assumptions, estimation procedure and results is carried out in the present paper. In detail, we analysed a 26-km 2 semi-arid basin, considering hourly forecasts over an almost continuous five-year period in 2000–2005. A distributed rainfall–runoff model suited to represent contributions of different runoff generation mechanisms to hydrologic response is used for deterministic predictions. Analysis of the resulting posterior distributions show that hydrologic uncertainty: (i) grows with the value of discharge predicted by the model; (ii) is higher when associated with high precipitation amounts; and (iii) increases with lead time of predictions. The predictive ability of the processor is investigated for several runoff events. The results indicate good processor performance for a lead time equal to the period covered by the precipitation forecast, and a significant deterioration for higher lead times that is heavily dominated by the presumption of null precipitation beyond the forecast period. Finally, the skill of the processor is assessed through a retrospective analysis in terms of the probability of detection and the false-alarm rate.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0022-1694</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1879-2707</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2010.03.004</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JHYDA7</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Kidlington: Elsevier B.V</publisher><subject>Assessments ; Bayes theorem ; Earth sciences ; Earth, ocean, space ; Exact sciences and technology ; Freshwater ; hydrologic models ; Hydrologic uncertainty ; Hydrologic Uncertainy Processor ; Hydrology ; Hydrology. Hydrogeology ; Lead time ; Mathematical models ; Microprocessors ; Precipitation ; rain ; Rainfall–runoff modelling ; Runoff ; semiarid zones ; simulation models ; Uncertainty ; watershed hydrology ; Watersheds</subject><ispartof>Journal of hydrology (Amsterdam), 2010-05, Vol.386 (1), p.38-54</ispartof><rights>2010 Elsevier B.V.</rights><rights>2015 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a418t-410a378c371db03c25336b8bd32d979013b24f08f4f422db9629fa21fd7c59fc3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-a418t-410a378c371db03c25336b8bd32d979013b24f08f4f422db9629fa21fd7c59fc3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022169410001307$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,27901,27902,65306</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=22829236$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Biondi, Daniela</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Versace, Pasquale</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sirangelo, Beniamino</creatorcontrib><title>Uncertainty assessment through a precipitation dependent hydrologic uncertainty processor: An application to a small catchment in southern Italy</title><title>Journal of hydrology (Amsterdam)</title><description>Adequate assessment of uncertainty for prediction and simulation purposes is a current issue in hydrological research. This article describes the application of the Hydrologic Uncertainty Processor (HUP) proposed by Krzystofowicz in 1999 to a small semi-arid watershed in southern Italy. The version applied in this work is a precipitation-dependent HUP aimed at assessing the hydrologic uncertainty about actual streamflow at some future time, with lead times of a few hours, given the information available at the forecast time and assuming a perfectly known amount of precipitation. The processor is based on Bayes theorem and hence models the prior and likelihood functions to obtain the revised posterior distribution. A complete example of the modelling assumptions, estimation procedure and results is carried out in the present paper. In detail, we analysed a 26-km 2 semi-arid basin, considering hourly forecasts over an almost continuous five-year period in 2000–2005. A distributed rainfall–runoff model suited to represent contributions of different runoff generation mechanisms to hydrologic response is used for deterministic predictions. Analysis of the resulting posterior distributions show that hydrologic uncertainty: (i) grows with the value of discharge predicted by the model; (ii) is higher when associated with high precipitation amounts; and (iii) increases with lead time of predictions. The predictive ability of the processor is investigated for several runoff events. The results indicate good processor performance for a lead time equal to the period covered by the precipitation forecast, and a significant deterioration for higher lead times that is heavily dominated by the presumption of null precipitation beyond the forecast period. Finally, the skill of the processor is assessed through a retrospective analysis in terms of the probability of detection and the false-alarm rate.</description><subject>Assessments</subject><subject>Bayes theorem</subject><subject>Earth sciences</subject><subject>Earth, ocean, space</subject><subject>Exact sciences and technology</subject><subject>Freshwater</subject><subject>hydrologic models</subject><subject>Hydrologic uncertainty</subject><subject>Hydrologic Uncertainy Processor</subject><subject>Hydrology</subject><subject>Hydrology. Hydrogeology</subject><subject>Lead time</subject><subject>Mathematical models</subject><subject>Microprocessors</subject><subject>Precipitation</subject><subject>rain</subject><subject>Rainfall–runoff modelling</subject><subject>Runoff</subject><subject>semiarid zones</subject><subject>simulation models</subject><subject>Uncertainty</subject><subject>watershed hydrology</subject><subject>Watersheds</subject><issn>0022-1694</issn><issn>1879-2707</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2010</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkc1qGzEUhUVpoK7TRyjVpnQ1rn7Go1E3JYQ2CQSyaL0WGv14ZGRpKmkCfos8cuWOKd1VG8HlO-dc7gHgPUYbjHD3-bA5jCedot8QVGeIbhBqX4EV7hlvCEPsNVghREiDO96-AW9zPqD6KG1X4GUXlElFulBOUOZscj6aUGAZU5z3I5RwSka5yRVZXAxQm8kEfSaWyLh3Cs7_eEwpqmoS0xd4E6CcJu_UIi2xuuWj9B7WiRr_5LgAc5zLaFKAD0X60zW4stJn8-7yr8Hu-7eft_fN49Pdw-3NYyNb3JemxUhS1ivKsB4QVWRLaTf0g6ZEc8YRpgNpLepta1tC9MA7wq0k2GqmttwqugafFt-68K_Z5CKOLivjvQwmzlmwLaeIddV2DbYLqVLMORkrpuSOMp0ERuJcgDiISwHiXIBAVNQCqu7jJUFmJb1NMiiX_4oJ6QkntKvch4WzMgq5T5XZ_ahGFOGeMt6zSnxdCFMP8uxMElk5U4-uXS2nCB3df3b5DTkIq8A</recordid><startdate>20100528</startdate><enddate>20100528</enddate><creator>Biondi, Daniela</creator><creator>Versace, Pasquale</creator><creator>Sirangelo, Beniamino</creator><general>Elsevier B.V</general><general>[Amsterdam; New York]: Elsevier</general><general>Elsevier</general><scope>FBQ</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>KR7</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20100528</creationdate><title>Uncertainty assessment through a precipitation dependent hydrologic uncertainty processor: An application to a small catchment in southern Italy</title><author>Biondi, Daniela ; Versace, Pasquale ; Sirangelo, Beniamino</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a418t-410a378c371db03c25336b8bd32d979013b24f08f4f422db9629fa21fd7c59fc3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2010</creationdate><topic>Assessments</topic><topic>Bayes theorem</topic><topic>Earth sciences</topic><topic>Earth, ocean, space</topic><topic>Exact sciences and technology</topic><topic>Freshwater</topic><topic>hydrologic models</topic><topic>Hydrologic uncertainty</topic><topic>Hydrologic Uncertainy Processor</topic><topic>Hydrology</topic><topic>Hydrology. Hydrogeology</topic><topic>Lead time</topic><topic>Mathematical models</topic><topic>Microprocessors</topic><topic>Precipitation</topic><topic>rain</topic><topic>Rainfall–runoff modelling</topic><topic>Runoff</topic><topic>semiarid zones</topic><topic>simulation models</topic><topic>Uncertainty</topic><topic>watershed hydrology</topic><topic>Watersheds</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Biondi, Daniela</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Versace, Pasquale</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sirangelo, Beniamino</creatorcontrib><collection>AGRIS</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Journal of hydrology (Amsterdam)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Biondi, Daniela</au><au>Versace, Pasquale</au><au>Sirangelo, Beniamino</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Uncertainty assessment through a precipitation dependent hydrologic uncertainty processor: An application to a small catchment in southern Italy</atitle><jtitle>Journal of hydrology (Amsterdam)</jtitle><date>2010-05-28</date><risdate>2010</risdate><volume>386</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>38</spage><epage>54</epage><pages>38-54</pages><issn>0022-1694</issn><eissn>1879-2707</eissn><coden>JHYDA7</coden><abstract>Adequate assessment of uncertainty for prediction and simulation purposes is a current issue in hydrological research. This article describes the application of the Hydrologic Uncertainty Processor (HUP) proposed by Krzystofowicz in 1999 to a small semi-arid watershed in southern Italy. The version applied in this work is a precipitation-dependent HUP aimed at assessing the hydrologic uncertainty about actual streamflow at some future time, with lead times of a few hours, given the information available at the forecast time and assuming a perfectly known amount of precipitation. The processor is based on Bayes theorem and hence models the prior and likelihood functions to obtain the revised posterior distribution. A complete example of the modelling assumptions, estimation procedure and results is carried out in the present paper. In detail, we analysed a 26-km 2 semi-arid basin, considering hourly forecasts over an almost continuous five-year period in 2000–2005. A distributed rainfall–runoff model suited to represent contributions of different runoff generation mechanisms to hydrologic response is used for deterministic predictions. Analysis of the resulting posterior distributions show that hydrologic uncertainty: (i) grows with the value of discharge predicted by the model; (ii) is higher when associated with high precipitation amounts; and (iii) increases with lead time of predictions. The predictive ability of the processor is investigated for several runoff events. The results indicate good processor performance for a lead time equal to the period covered by the precipitation forecast, and a significant deterioration for higher lead times that is heavily dominated by the presumption of null precipitation beyond the forecast period. Finally, the skill of the processor is assessed through a retrospective analysis in terms of the probability of detection and the false-alarm rate.</abstract><cop>Kidlington</cop><pub>Elsevier B.V</pub><doi>10.1016/j.jhydrol.2010.03.004</doi><tpages>17</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0022-1694
ispartof Journal of hydrology (Amsterdam), 2010-05, Vol.386 (1), p.38-54
issn 0022-1694
1879-2707
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_759307653
source Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals
subjects Assessments
Bayes theorem
Earth sciences
Earth, ocean, space
Exact sciences and technology
Freshwater
hydrologic models
Hydrologic uncertainty
Hydrologic Uncertainy Processor
Hydrology
Hydrology. Hydrogeology
Lead time
Mathematical models
Microprocessors
Precipitation
rain
Rainfall–runoff modelling
Runoff
semiarid zones
simulation models
Uncertainty
watershed hydrology
Watersheds
title Uncertainty assessment through a precipitation dependent hydrologic uncertainty processor: An application to a small catchment in southern Italy
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-28T18%3A59%3A12IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Uncertainty%20assessment%20through%20a%20precipitation%20dependent%20hydrologic%20uncertainty%20processor:%20An%20application%20to%20a%20small%20catchment%20in%20southern%20Italy&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20hydrology%20(Amsterdam)&rft.au=Biondi,%20Daniela&rft.date=2010-05-28&rft.volume=386&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=38&rft.epage=54&rft.pages=38-54&rft.issn=0022-1694&rft.eissn=1879-2707&rft.coden=JHYDA7&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2010.03.004&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E759307653%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=759307653&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=S0022169410001307&rfr_iscdi=true