Comparison of intraluminal and intravenous mediators of colonic response to eating
Eating a 1000-kcal mixed meal stimulates an increase in distal colonic motility. Fat is the dietary component which is the major stimulant of colonic spike activity. In this study the colonic spike activity increased similarly after the mixed meal [19.1 +/- 2.4 spike potentials (SP)/30 min] and afte...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Digestive diseases and sciences 1985, Vol.30 (1), p.33-39 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 39 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 33 |
container_title | Digestive diseases and sciences |
container_volume | 30 |
creator | LEVINSON, S BHASKER, M GIBSON, T. R MORIN, R SNAPE, W. J. JR |
description | Eating a 1000-kcal mixed meal stimulates an increase in distal colonic motility. Fat is the dietary component which is the major stimulant of colonic spike activity. In this study the colonic spike activity increased similarly after the mixed meal [19.1 +/- 2.4 spike potentials (SP)/30 min] and after the fat meal (19.4 +/- 5.4 SP/30 min). Fat stimulated a concentration-dependent increase in colonic motility only when in contact with the gastroduodenal mucosa. Intravenous administration of Liposyn (100 kcal/hr) did not stimulate an increase in colonic spike activity (3.3 +/- 1.3 SP/30 min) despite greater increase in plasma total fatty acid levels than after the oral ingestion of fat. In contrast both the oral ingestion and the intravenous administration of an amino acid mixture (Aminosyn) inhibited the gastrocolonic response after the 1000-kcal mixed meal. Thus, these studies demonstrate: (1) fat stimulates colonic motility only through direct mucosal contact, and (2) a mixture of amino acid inhibits colonic motility through either mucosal contact or by circulating in the plasma. The exact neurohumoral mechanisms involved in both of these effects is unknown at present. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/BF01318368 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_75923655</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>75923655</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c311t-7c87c2971653f29d6ac31f8756f4a9ee179f6e5794b5ea22a53a130c086d445f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpFkM1LxDAQxYMo67p68S70IB6Eaj6ar6MurgoLgui5zKaJRNqkJl3B_94uW_Q0w7wfjzcPoXOCbwjG8vZ-hQkjigl1gOaES1ZSLtQhmmMixp0QcYxOcv7EGGtJxAzNmGIKKz1Hr8vY9ZB8jqGIrvBhSNBuOx-gLSA0-8O3DXGbi842HoaY8o40sY3BmyLZ3MeQbTHEwsLgw8cpOnLQZns2zQV6Xz28LZ_K9cvj8_JuXRpGyFBKo6ShuzycOaobAePdKcmFq0BbS6R2wnKpqw23QClwBoRhg5Voqoo7tkBXe98-xa-tzUPd-Wxs20KwY9xack2Z4HwEr_egSTHnZF3dJ99B-qkJrncF1v8FjvDF5LrdjA__oVNjo3456ZANtC5BMD7_YZpiSrBkv1jsd3c</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>75923655</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comparison of intraluminal and intravenous mediators of colonic response to eating</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>SpringerLink (Online service)</source><creator>LEVINSON, S ; BHASKER, M ; GIBSON, T. R ; MORIN, R ; SNAPE, W. J. JR</creator><creatorcontrib>LEVINSON, S ; BHASKER, M ; GIBSON, T. R ; MORIN, R ; SNAPE, W. J. JR</creatorcontrib><description>Eating a 1000-kcal mixed meal stimulates an increase in distal colonic motility. Fat is the dietary component which is the major stimulant of colonic spike activity. In this study the colonic spike activity increased similarly after the mixed meal [19.1 +/- 2.4 spike potentials (SP)/30 min] and after the fat meal (19.4 +/- 5.4 SP/30 min). Fat stimulated a concentration-dependent increase in colonic motility only when in contact with the gastroduodenal mucosa. Intravenous administration of Liposyn (100 kcal/hr) did not stimulate an increase in colonic spike activity (3.3 +/- 1.3 SP/30 min) despite greater increase in plasma total fatty acid levels than after the oral ingestion of fat. In contrast both the oral ingestion and the intravenous administration of an amino acid mixture (Aminosyn) inhibited the gastrocolonic response after the 1000-kcal mixed meal. Thus, these studies demonstrate: (1) fat stimulates colonic motility only through direct mucosal contact, and (2) a mixture of amino acid inhibits colonic motility through either mucosal contact or by circulating in the plasma. The exact neurohumoral mechanisms involved in both of these effects is unknown at present.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0163-2116</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1573-2568</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/BF01318368</identifier><identifier>PMID: 3838089</identifier><identifier>CODEN: DDSCDJ</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Heidelberg: Springer</publisher><subject>Action Potentials - drug effects ; Administration, Oral ; Adult ; Amino Acids - administration & dosage ; Biological and medical sciences ; Colon - physiology ; Eating ; Emulsions ; Fat Emulsions, Intravenous - administration & dosage ; Fatty Acids - blood ; Fatty Acids - pharmacology ; Female ; Food, Formulated ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; Gastrointestinal Motility - drug effects ; Humans ; Infusions, Parenteral ; Intestinal Mucosa - metabolism ; Intestine. Mesentery ; Lecithins ; Linoleic Acid ; Linoleic Acids - blood ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Neostigmine - administration & dosage ; Safflower Oil ; Soybean Oil ; Vertebrates: digestive system</subject><ispartof>Digestive diseases and sciences, 1985, Vol.30 (1), p.33-39</ispartof><rights>1985 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c311t-7c87c2971653f29d6ac31f8756f4a9ee179f6e5794b5ea22a53a130c086d445f3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c311t-7c87c2971653f29d6ac31f8756f4a9ee179f6e5794b5ea22a53a130c086d445f3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,4010,27900,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=9202107$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/3838089$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>LEVINSON, S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>BHASKER, M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>GIBSON, T. R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>MORIN, R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>SNAPE, W. J. JR</creatorcontrib><title>Comparison of intraluminal and intravenous mediators of colonic response to eating</title><title>Digestive diseases and sciences</title><addtitle>Dig Dis Sci</addtitle><description>Eating a 1000-kcal mixed meal stimulates an increase in distal colonic motility. Fat is the dietary component which is the major stimulant of colonic spike activity. In this study the colonic spike activity increased similarly after the mixed meal [19.1 +/- 2.4 spike potentials (SP)/30 min] and after the fat meal (19.4 +/- 5.4 SP/30 min). Fat stimulated a concentration-dependent increase in colonic motility only when in contact with the gastroduodenal mucosa. Intravenous administration of Liposyn (100 kcal/hr) did not stimulate an increase in colonic spike activity (3.3 +/- 1.3 SP/30 min) despite greater increase in plasma total fatty acid levels than after the oral ingestion of fat. In contrast both the oral ingestion and the intravenous administration of an amino acid mixture (Aminosyn) inhibited the gastrocolonic response after the 1000-kcal mixed meal. Thus, these studies demonstrate: (1) fat stimulates colonic motility only through direct mucosal contact, and (2) a mixture of amino acid inhibits colonic motility through either mucosal contact or by circulating in the plasma. The exact neurohumoral mechanisms involved in both of these effects is unknown at present.</description><subject>Action Potentials - drug effects</subject><subject>Administration, Oral</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Amino Acids - administration & dosage</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Colon - physiology</subject><subject>Eating</subject><subject>Emulsions</subject><subject>Fat Emulsions, Intravenous - administration & dosage</subject><subject>Fatty Acids - blood</subject><subject>Fatty Acids - pharmacology</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Food, Formulated</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>Gastrointestinal Motility - drug effects</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Infusions, Parenteral</subject><subject>Intestinal Mucosa - metabolism</subject><subject>Intestine. Mesentery</subject><subject>Lecithins</subject><subject>Linoleic Acid</subject><subject>Linoleic Acids - blood</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Neostigmine - administration & dosage</subject><subject>Safflower Oil</subject><subject>Soybean Oil</subject><subject>Vertebrates: digestive system</subject><issn>0163-2116</issn><issn>1573-2568</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1985</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNpFkM1LxDAQxYMo67p68S70IB6Eaj6ar6MurgoLgui5zKaJRNqkJl3B_94uW_Q0w7wfjzcPoXOCbwjG8vZ-hQkjigl1gOaES1ZSLtQhmmMixp0QcYxOcv7EGGtJxAzNmGIKKz1Hr8vY9ZB8jqGIrvBhSNBuOx-gLSA0-8O3DXGbi842HoaY8o40sY3BmyLZ3MeQbTHEwsLgw8cpOnLQZns2zQV6Xz28LZ_K9cvj8_JuXRpGyFBKo6ShuzycOaobAePdKcmFq0BbS6R2wnKpqw23QClwBoRhg5Voqoo7tkBXe98-xa-tzUPd-Wxs20KwY9xack2Z4HwEr_egSTHnZF3dJ99B-qkJrncF1v8FjvDF5LrdjA__oVNjo3456ZANtC5BMD7_YZpiSrBkv1jsd3c</recordid><startdate>1985</startdate><enddate>1985</enddate><creator>LEVINSON, S</creator><creator>BHASKER, M</creator><creator>GIBSON, T. R</creator><creator>MORIN, R</creator><creator>SNAPE, W. J. JR</creator><general>Springer</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>1985</creationdate><title>Comparison of intraluminal and intravenous mediators of colonic response to eating</title><author>LEVINSON, S ; BHASKER, M ; GIBSON, T. R ; MORIN, R ; SNAPE, W. J. JR</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c311t-7c87c2971653f29d6ac31f8756f4a9ee179f6e5794b5ea22a53a130c086d445f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1985</creationdate><topic>Action Potentials - drug effects</topic><topic>Administration, Oral</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Amino Acids - administration & dosage</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Colon - physiology</topic><topic>Eating</topic><topic>Emulsions</topic><topic>Fat Emulsions, Intravenous - administration & dosage</topic><topic>Fatty Acids - blood</topic><topic>Fatty Acids - pharmacology</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Food, Formulated</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>Gastrointestinal Motility - drug effects</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Infusions, Parenteral</topic><topic>Intestinal Mucosa - metabolism</topic><topic>Intestine. Mesentery</topic><topic>Lecithins</topic><topic>Linoleic Acid</topic><topic>Linoleic Acids - blood</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Neostigmine - administration & dosage</topic><topic>Safflower Oil</topic><topic>Soybean Oil</topic><topic>Vertebrates: digestive system</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>LEVINSON, S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>BHASKER, M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>GIBSON, T. R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>MORIN, R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>SNAPE, W. J. JR</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Digestive diseases and sciences</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>LEVINSON, S</au><au>BHASKER, M</au><au>GIBSON, T. R</au><au>MORIN, R</au><au>SNAPE, W. J. JR</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Comparison of intraluminal and intravenous mediators of colonic response to eating</atitle><jtitle>Digestive diseases and sciences</jtitle><addtitle>Dig Dis Sci</addtitle><date>1985</date><risdate>1985</risdate><volume>30</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>33</spage><epage>39</epage><pages>33-39</pages><issn>0163-2116</issn><eissn>1573-2568</eissn><coden>DDSCDJ</coden><abstract>Eating a 1000-kcal mixed meal stimulates an increase in distal colonic motility. Fat is the dietary component which is the major stimulant of colonic spike activity. In this study the colonic spike activity increased similarly after the mixed meal [19.1 +/- 2.4 spike potentials (SP)/30 min] and after the fat meal (19.4 +/- 5.4 SP/30 min). Fat stimulated a concentration-dependent increase in colonic motility only when in contact with the gastroduodenal mucosa. Intravenous administration of Liposyn (100 kcal/hr) did not stimulate an increase in colonic spike activity (3.3 +/- 1.3 SP/30 min) despite greater increase in plasma total fatty acid levels than after the oral ingestion of fat. In contrast both the oral ingestion and the intravenous administration of an amino acid mixture (Aminosyn) inhibited the gastrocolonic response after the 1000-kcal mixed meal. Thus, these studies demonstrate: (1) fat stimulates colonic motility only through direct mucosal contact, and (2) a mixture of amino acid inhibits colonic motility through either mucosal contact or by circulating in the plasma. The exact neurohumoral mechanisms involved in both of these effects is unknown at present.</abstract><cop>Heidelberg</cop><pub>Springer</pub><pmid>3838089</pmid><doi>10.1007/BF01318368</doi><tpages>7</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0163-2116 |
ispartof | Digestive diseases and sciences, 1985, Vol.30 (1), p.33-39 |
issn | 0163-2116 1573-2568 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_75923655 |
source | MEDLINE; SpringerLink (Online service) |
subjects | Action Potentials - drug effects Administration, Oral Adult Amino Acids - administration & dosage Biological and medical sciences Colon - physiology Eating Emulsions Fat Emulsions, Intravenous - administration & dosage Fatty Acids - blood Fatty Acids - pharmacology Female Food, Formulated Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology Gastrointestinal Motility - drug effects Humans Infusions, Parenteral Intestinal Mucosa - metabolism Intestine. Mesentery Lecithins Linoleic Acid Linoleic Acids - blood Male Middle Aged Neostigmine - administration & dosage Safflower Oil Soybean Oil Vertebrates: digestive system |
title | Comparison of intraluminal and intravenous mediators of colonic response to eating |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-07T15%3A59%3A58IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparison%20of%20intraluminal%20and%20intravenous%20mediators%20of%20colonic%20response%20to%20eating&rft.jtitle=Digestive%20diseases%20and%20sciences&rft.au=LEVINSON,%20S&rft.date=1985&rft.volume=30&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=33&rft.epage=39&rft.pages=33-39&rft.issn=0163-2116&rft.eissn=1573-2568&rft.coden=DDSCDJ&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/BF01318368&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E75923655%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=75923655&rft_id=info:pmid/3838089&rfr_iscdi=true |