Evidence for bimodal distribution of breast carcinoma ER and PgR values quantitated by enzyme immunoassay
Breast carcinoma oestrogen receptor (ER) and progesterone receptor (PgR) values obtained by radioligand binding assays have commonly been observed to have approximate log-normal distributions. We examined the distribution of log-transformed receptor values obtained by enzyme immunoassay for 5468 pri...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | European journal of cancer (1990) 1993, Vol.29 (9), p.1293-1297 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 1297 |
---|---|
container_issue | 9 |
container_start_page | 1293 |
container_title | European journal of cancer (1990) |
container_volume | 29 |
creator | Mobbs, Betty G. Chapman, Judy-Anne W. Sutherland, Donald J.A. Ryan, Eamonn Tustanoff, Eugene R. Ooi, Teik C. Murthy, P.V.Narasimha |
description | Breast carcinoma oestrogen receptor (ER) and progesterone receptor (PgR) values obtained by radioligand binding assays have commonly been observed to have approximate log-normal distributions. We examined the distribution of log-transformed receptor values obtained by enzyme immunoassay for 5468 primary breast carcinomas in five Ontario laboratories. In each laboratory, it was found that the frequency histograms for the log transformed receptor values were not unimodal, and generally were suggestive of bimodality. This was not affected by stratification by age or inferred menopausal status (⩽ 49, ⩾ 50 years), and could not be explained by kit characteristics. However, the low point in the distribution varied from 5 to 63 fmol/mg cytosol protein, depending on the receptor, patient age and laboratory. The tendency towards biomodality was more distinct for ER than for PgR. It remains to be determined whether the low points on the frequency histograms have clinical relevance for discriminating between hormone-sensitive and hormone-insensitive tumours. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/0959-8049(93)90076-R |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_75913287</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>095980499390076R</els_id><sourcerecordid>75913287</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c357t-66196b2f228a3e5cc2e76b5a5aae490e8c489bf30cf2a0d18792ee49d33e8f9b3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kEtr3DAQx0VoSbZJvkEKOpX04FaW_JAugbBsHxBoWZKzGEnjoGJbiSQvbD597OySY09z-D9m5kfIVcm-laxsvjNVq0KySl0r8VUx1jbF9oSsStmqgsmafyCrd8sZ-ZTSPzabZMVOyakUleBtuSJ-s_MOR4u0C5EaPwQHPXU-5ejNlH0YaeioiQgpUwvR-jEMQDdbCqOjfx-3dAf9hIk-TzBmnyGjo2ZPcXzZD0j9MExjgJRgf0E-dtAnvDzOc_LwY3O__lXc_fn5e317V1hRt7lomlI1hnecSxBYW8uxbUwNNQBWiqG0lVSmE8x2HJhbvuU4K04IlJ0y4px8OfQ-xfA8X5b14JPFvocRw5R0W6tScNnOxupgtDGkFLHTT9EPEPe6ZHohrBd8esGnldBvhPV2jn0-9k9mQPceOiKd9ZuDjvOTO49RJ-sXws5HtFm74P-_4BW_6oyc</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>75913287</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Evidence for bimodal distribution of breast carcinoma ER and PgR values quantitated by enzyme immunoassay</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)</source><creator>Mobbs, Betty G. ; Chapman, Judy-Anne W. ; Sutherland, Donald J.A. ; Ryan, Eamonn ; Tustanoff, Eugene R. ; Ooi, Teik C. ; Murthy, P.V.Narasimha</creator><creatorcontrib>Mobbs, Betty G. ; Chapman, Judy-Anne W. ; Sutherland, Donald J.A. ; Ryan, Eamonn ; Tustanoff, Eugene R. ; Ooi, Teik C. ; Murthy, P.V.Narasimha</creatorcontrib><description>Breast carcinoma oestrogen receptor (ER) and progesterone receptor (PgR) values obtained by radioligand binding assays have commonly been observed to have approximate log-normal distributions. We examined the distribution of log-transformed receptor values obtained by enzyme immunoassay for 5468 primary breast carcinomas in five Ontario laboratories. In each laboratory, it was found that the frequency histograms for the log transformed receptor values were not unimodal, and generally were suggestive of bimodality. This was not affected by stratification by age or inferred menopausal status (⩽ 49, ⩾ 50 years), and could not be explained by kit characteristics. However, the low point in the distribution varied from 5 to 63 fmol/mg cytosol protein, depending on the receptor, patient age and laboratory. The tendency towards biomodality was more distinct for ER than for PgR. It remains to be determined whether the low points on the frequency histograms have clinical relevance for discriminating between hormone-sensitive and hormone-insensitive tumours.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0959-8049</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1879-0852</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/0959-8049(93)90076-R</identifier><identifier>PMID: 8343271</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Adult ; Age Factors ; Aged ; Breast Neoplasms - chemistry ; Female ; Humans ; Immunoenzyme Techniques ; Middle Aged ; Neoplasm Proteins - analysis ; Receptors, Estrogen - analysis ; Receptors, Progesterone - analysis ; Reproducibility of Results</subject><ispartof>European journal of cancer (1990), 1993, Vol.29 (9), p.1293-1297</ispartof><rights>1993</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c357t-66196b2f228a3e5cc2e76b5a5aae490e8c489bf30cf2a0d18792ee49d33e8f9b3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c357t-66196b2f228a3e5cc2e76b5a5aae490e8c489bf30cf2a0d18792ee49d33e8f9b3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0959-8049(93)90076-R$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3550,4024,27923,27924,27925,45995</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8343271$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Mobbs, Betty G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chapman, Judy-Anne W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sutherland, Donald J.A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ryan, Eamonn</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tustanoff, Eugene R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ooi, Teik C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Murthy, P.V.Narasimha</creatorcontrib><title>Evidence for bimodal distribution of breast carcinoma ER and PgR values quantitated by enzyme immunoassay</title><title>European journal of cancer (1990)</title><addtitle>Eur J Cancer</addtitle><description>Breast carcinoma oestrogen receptor (ER) and progesterone receptor (PgR) values obtained by radioligand binding assays have commonly been observed to have approximate log-normal distributions. We examined the distribution of log-transformed receptor values obtained by enzyme immunoassay for 5468 primary breast carcinomas in five Ontario laboratories. In each laboratory, it was found that the frequency histograms for the log transformed receptor values were not unimodal, and generally were suggestive of bimodality. This was not affected by stratification by age or inferred menopausal status (⩽ 49, ⩾ 50 years), and could not be explained by kit characteristics. However, the low point in the distribution varied from 5 to 63 fmol/mg cytosol protein, depending on the receptor, patient age and laboratory. The tendency towards biomodality was more distinct for ER than for PgR. It remains to be determined whether the low points on the frequency histograms have clinical relevance for discriminating between hormone-sensitive and hormone-insensitive tumours.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Age Factors</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Breast Neoplasms - chemistry</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Immunoenzyme Techniques</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Neoplasm Proteins - analysis</subject><subject>Receptors, Estrogen - analysis</subject><subject>Receptors, Progesterone - analysis</subject><subject>Reproducibility of Results</subject><issn>0959-8049</issn><issn>1879-0852</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1993</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kEtr3DAQx0VoSbZJvkEKOpX04FaW_JAugbBsHxBoWZKzGEnjoGJbiSQvbD597OySY09z-D9m5kfIVcm-laxsvjNVq0KySl0r8VUx1jbF9oSsStmqgsmafyCrd8sZ-ZTSPzabZMVOyakUleBtuSJ-s_MOR4u0C5EaPwQHPXU-5ejNlH0YaeioiQgpUwvR-jEMQDdbCqOjfx-3dAf9hIk-TzBmnyGjo2ZPcXzZD0j9MExjgJRgf0E-dtAnvDzOc_LwY3O__lXc_fn5e317V1hRt7lomlI1hnecSxBYW8uxbUwNNQBWiqG0lVSmE8x2HJhbvuU4K04IlJ0y4px8OfQ-xfA8X5b14JPFvocRw5R0W6tScNnOxupgtDGkFLHTT9EPEPe6ZHohrBd8esGnldBvhPV2jn0-9k9mQPceOiKd9ZuDjvOTO49RJ-sXws5HtFm74P-_4BW_6oyc</recordid><startdate>1993</startdate><enddate>1993</enddate><creator>Mobbs, Betty G.</creator><creator>Chapman, Judy-Anne W.</creator><creator>Sutherland, Donald J.A.</creator><creator>Ryan, Eamonn</creator><creator>Tustanoff, Eugene R.</creator><creator>Ooi, Teik C.</creator><creator>Murthy, P.V.Narasimha</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>1993</creationdate><title>Evidence for bimodal distribution of breast carcinoma ER and PgR values quantitated by enzyme immunoassay</title><author>Mobbs, Betty G. ; Chapman, Judy-Anne W. ; Sutherland, Donald J.A. ; Ryan, Eamonn ; Tustanoff, Eugene R. ; Ooi, Teik C. ; Murthy, P.V.Narasimha</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c357t-66196b2f228a3e5cc2e76b5a5aae490e8c489bf30cf2a0d18792ee49d33e8f9b3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1993</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Age Factors</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Breast Neoplasms - chemistry</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Immunoenzyme Techniques</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Neoplasm Proteins - analysis</topic><topic>Receptors, Estrogen - analysis</topic><topic>Receptors, Progesterone - analysis</topic><topic>Reproducibility of Results</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Mobbs, Betty G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chapman, Judy-Anne W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sutherland, Donald J.A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ryan, Eamonn</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tustanoff, Eugene R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ooi, Teik C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Murthy, P.V.Narasimha</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>European journal of cancer (1990)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Mobbs, Betty G.</au><au>Chapman, Judy-Anne W.</au><au>Sutherland, Donald J.A.</au><au>Ryan, Eamonn</au><au>Tustanoff, Eugene R.</au><au>Ooi, Teik C.</au><au>Murthy, P.V.Narasimha</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Evidence for bimodal distribution of breast carcinoma ER and PgR values quantitated by enzyme immunoassay</atitle><jtitle>European journal of cancer (1990)</jtitle><addtitle>Eur J Cancer</addtitle><date>1993</date><risdate>1993</risdate><volume>29</volume><issue>9</issue><spage>1293</spage><epage>1297</epage><pages>1293-1297</pages><issn>0959-8049</issn><eissn>1879-0852</eissn><abstract>Breast carcinoma oestrogen receptor (ER) and progesterone receptor (PgR) values obtained by radioligand binding assays have commonly been observed to have approximate log-normal distributions. We examined the distribution of log-transformed receptor values obtained by enzyme immunoassay for 5468 primary breast carcinomas in five Ontario laboratories. In each laboratory, it was found that the frequency histograms for the log transformed receptor values were not unimodal, and generally were suggestive of bimodality. This was not affected by stratification by age or inferred menopausal status (⩽ 49, ⩾ 50 years), and could not be explained by kit characteristics. However, the low point in the distribution varied from 5 to 63 fmol/mg cytosol protein, depending on the receptor, patient age and laboratory. The tendency towards biomodality was more distinct for ER than for PgR. It remains to be determined whether the low points on the frequency histograms have clinical relevance for discriminating between hormone-sensitive and hormone-insensitive tumours.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>8343271</pmid><doi>10.1016/0959-8049(93)90076-R</doi><tpages>5</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0959-8049 |
ispartof | European journal of cancer (1990), 1993, Vol.29 (9), p.1293-1297 |
issn | 0959-8049 1879-0852 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_75913287 |
source | MEDLINE; Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier) |
subjects | Adult Age Factors Aged Breast Neoplasms - chemistry Female Humans Immunoenzyme Techniques Middle Aged Neoplasm Proteins - analysis Receptors, Estrogen - analysis Receptors, Progesterone - analysis Reproducibility of Results |
title | Evidence for bimodal distribution of breast carcinoma ER and PgR values quantitated by enzyme immunoassay |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-02T18%3A55%3A50IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Evidence%20for%20bimodal%20distribution%20of%20breast%20carcinoma%20ER%20and%20PgR%20values%20quantitated%20by%20enzyme%20immunoassay&rft.jtitle=European%20journal%20of%20cancer%20(1990)&rft.au=Mobbs,%20Betty%20G.&rft.date=1993&rft.volume=29&rft.issue=9&rft.spage=1293&rft.epage=1297&rft.pages=1293-1297&rft.issn=0959-8049&rft.eissn=1879-0852&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/0959-8049(93)90076-R&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E75913287%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=75913287&rft_id=info:pmid/8343271&rft_els_id=095980499390076R&rfr_iscdi=true |