The reliability and acceptability of the Multiple Mini-Interview as a selection instrument for postgraduate admissions
The Multiple Mini-Interview (MMI) is useful in selecting undergraduate medical trainees. Postgraduate applicant pools have smaller numbers of more homogeneous candidates that must be actively recruited while being assessed. This paper reports on the MMI's use in assessing residency candidates....
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Academic Medicine 2010-10, Vol.85 (10 Suppl), p.S60-S63 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | S63 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 10 Suppl |
| container_start_page | S60 |
| container_title | Academic Medicine |
| container_volume | 85 |
| creator | Dore, Kelly L Kreuger, Sharyn Ladhani, Moyez Rolfson, Darryl Kurtz, Doris Kulasegaram, Kulamakan Cullimore, Amie J Norman, Geoffrey R Eva, Kevin W Bates, Stephen Reiter, Harold I |
| description | The Multiple Mini-Interview (MMI) is useful in selecting undergraduate medical trainees. Postgraduate applicant pools have smaller numbers of more homogeneous candidates that must be actively recruited while being assessed. This paper reports on the MMI's use in assessing residency candidates.
Canadian and international medical graduates to three residency programs--obstetrics-gynecology and pediatrics (McMaster University) and internal medicine (University of Alberta)--underwent the MMI for residency selection (n = 484) in 2008 and 2009. Reliability was determined and candidates and interviewers completed an exit survey assessing acceptability.
Overall reliability of the MMI was acceptable, ranging from 0.55 to 0.72. Using 10 stations would increase reliability to 0.64-0.79. Eighty-eight percent of candidates believed they could accurately portray themselves, while 90% of interviewers believed they could reasonably judge candidates' abilities.
The MMI provides a reliable way to assess residency candidates that is acceptable to both candidates and assessors across a variety of programs. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1097/ACM.0b013e3181ed442b |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_758832543</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>758832543</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c403t-a65b843281cf57c9daab65f727c4cf329182478009b4e6c94745999e658d89363</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdkMtKAzEUhoMotlbfQCQ7V1OTSTJJlqV4KbS4qeBuyGTOaGRuJplK394RWxeuzs_hOxc-hK4pmVOi5d1iuZmTglAGjCoKJedpcYKmVDOVKKJeT8dMOElSzrMJugjhgxCSScHO0SQlSlFJsinabd8Be6idKVzt4h6btsTGWujjsdNVOI7QZqij6-sxuNYlqzaC3zn4wiZggwPUYKPrWuzaEP3QQBtx1XncdyG-eVMOJgI2ZeNCGKlwic4qUwe4OtQZenm43y6fkvXz42q5WCeWExYTk4lCcZYqaishrS6NKTJRyVRabiuWaqpSLhUhuuCQWc0lF1pryIQqlWYZm6Hb37297z4HCDEfP7BQ16aFbgi5FEqxVHA2kvyXtL4LwUOV9941xu9zSvIf4fkoPP8vfBy7ORwYigbKv6GjYfYNtCB-7A</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>758832543</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The reliability and acceptability of the Multiple Mini-Interview as a selection instrument for postgraduate admissions</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Journals@Ovid LWW Legacy Archive</source><source>Journals@Ovid Complete</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Dore, Kelly L ; Kreuger, Sharyn ; Ladhani, Moyez ; Rolfson, Darryl ; Kurtz, Doris ; Kulasegaram, Kulamakan ; Cullimore, Amie J ; Norman, Geoffrey R ; Eva, Kevin W ; Bates, Stephen ; Reiter, Harold I</creator><creatorcontrib>Dore, Kelly L ; Kreuger, Sharyn ; Ladhani, Moyez ; Rolfson, Darryl ; Kurtz, Doris ; Kulasegaram, Kulamakan ; Cullimore, Amie J ; Norman, Geoffrey R ; Eva, Kevin W ; Bates, Stephen ; Reiter, Harold I</creatorcontrib><description>The Multiple Mini-Interview (MMI) is useful in selecting undergraduate medical trainees. Postgraduate applicant pools have smaller numbers of more homogeneous candidates that must be actively recruited while being assessed. This paper reports on the MMI's use in assessing residency candidates.
Canadian and international medical graduates to three residency programs--obstetrics-gynecology and pediatrics (McMaster University) and internal medicine (University of Alberta)--underwent the MMI for residency selection (n = 484) in 2008 and 2009. Reliability was determined and candidates and interviewers completed an exit survey assessing acceptability.
Overall reliability of the MMI was acceptable, ranging from 0.55 to 0.72. Using 10 stations would increase reliability to 0.64-0.79. Eighty-eight percent of candidates believed they could accurately portray themselves, while 90% of interviewers believed they could reasonably judge candidates' abilities.
The MMI provides a reliable way to assess residency candidates that is acceptable to both candidates and assessors across a variety of programs.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1040-2446</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1938-808X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1097/ACM.0b013e3181ed442b</identifier><identifier>PMID: 20881706</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States</publisher><subject>Adult ; Alberta ; College Admission Test ; Decision Making ; Education, Medical, Graduate ; Female ; Foreign Medical Graduates ; Gynecology - education ; Humans ; Internship and Residency - standards ; Interview, Psychological - methods ; Interviews as Topic ; Male ; Obstetrics - education ; Pediatrics - education ; Professional Competence ; Reproducibility of Results</subject><ispartof>Academic Medicine, 2010-10, Vol.85 (10 Suppl), p.S60-S63</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c403t-a65b843281cf57c9daab65f727c4cf329182478009b4e6c94745999e658d89363</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c403t-a65b843281cf57c9daab65f727c4cf329182478009b4e6c94745999e658d89363</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20881706$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Dore, Kelly L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kreuger, Sharyn</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ladhani, Moyez</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rolfson, Darryl</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kurtz, Doris</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kulasegaram, Kulamakan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cullimore, Amie J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Norman, Geoffrey R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Eva, Kevin W</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bates, Stephen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Reiter, Harold I</creatorcontrib><title>The reliability and acceptability of the Multiple Mini-Interview as a selection instrument for postgraduate admissions</title><title>Academic Medicine</title><addtitle>Acad Med</addtitle><description>The Multiple Mini-Interview (MMI) is useful in selecting undergraduate medical trainees. Postgraduate applicant pools have smaller numbers of more homogeneous candidates that must be actively recruited while being assessed. This paper reports on the MMI's use in assessing residency candidates.
Canadian and international medical graduates to three residency programs--obstetrics-gynecology and pediatrics (McMaster University) and internal medicine (University of Alberta)--underwent the MMI for residency selection (n = 484) in 2008 and 2009. Reliability was determined and candidates and interviewers completed an exit survey assessing acceptability.
Overall reliability of the MMI was acceptable, ranging from 0.55 to 0.72. Using 10 stations would increase reliability to 0.64-0.79. Eighty-eight percent of candidates believed they could accurately portray themselves, while 90% of interviewers believed they could reasonably judge candidates' abilities.
The MMI provides a reliable way to assess residency candidates that is acceptable to both candidates and assessors across a variety of programs.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Alberta</subject><subject>College Admission Test</subject><subject>Decision Making</subject><subject>Education, Medical, Graduate</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Foreign Medical Graduates</subject><subject>Gynecology - education</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Internship and Residency - standards</subject><subject>Interview, Psychological - methods</subject><subject>Interviews as Topic</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Obstetrics - education</subject><subject>Pediatrics - education</subject><subject>Professional Competence</subject><subject>Reproducibility of Results</subject><issn>1040-2446</issn><issn>1938-808X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2010</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNpdkMtKAzEUhoMotlbfQCQ7V1OTSTJJlqV4KbS4qeBuyGTOaGRuJplK394RWxeuzs_hOxc-hK4pmVOi5d1iuZmTglAGjCoKJedpcYKmVDOVKKJeT8dMOElSzrMJugjhgxCSScHO0SQlSlFJsinabd8Be6idKVzt4h6btsTGWujjsdNVOI7QZqij6-sxuNYlqzaC3zn4wiZggwPUYKPrWuzaEP3QQBtx1XncdyG-eVMOJgI2ZeNCGKlwic4qUwe4OtQZenm43y6fkvXz42q5WCeWExYTk4lCcZYqaishrS6NKTJRyVRabiuWaqpSLhUhuuCQWc0lF1pryIQqlWYZm6Hb37297z4HCDEfP7BQ16aFbgi5FEqxVHA2kvyXtL4LwUOV9941xu9zSvIf4fkoPP8vfBy7ORwYigbKv6GjYfYNtCB-7A</recordid><startdate>20101001</startdate><enddate>20101001</enddate><creator>Dore, Kelly L</creator><creator>Kreuger, Sharyn</creator><creator>Ladhani, Moyez</creator><creator>Rolfson, Darryl</creator><creator>Kurtz, Doris</creator><creator>Kulasegaram, Kulamakan</creator><creator>Cullimore, Amie J</creator><creator>Norman, Geoffrey R</creator><creator>Eva, Kevin W</creator><creator>Bates, Stephen</creator><creator>Reiter, Harold I</creator><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20101001</creationdate><title>The reliability and acceptability of the Multiple Mini-Interview as a selection instrument for postgraduate admissions</title><author>Dore, Kelly L ; Kreuger, Sharyn ; Ladhani, Moyez ; Rolfson, Darryl ; Kurtz, Doris ; Kulasegaram, Kulamakan ; Cullimore, Amie J ; Norman, Geoffrey R ; Eva, Kevin W ; Bates, Stephen ; Reiter, Harold I</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c403t-a65b843281cf57c9daab65f727c4cf329182478009b4e6c94745999e658d89363</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2010</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Alberta</topic><topic>College Admission Test</topic><topic>Decision Making</topic><topic>Education, Medical, Graduate</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Foreign Medical Graduates</topic><topic>Gynecology - education</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Internship and Residency - standards</topic><topic>Interview, Psychological - methods</topic><topic>Interviews as Topic</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Obstetrics - education</topic><topic>Pediatrics - education</topic><topic>Professional Competence</topic><topic>Reproducibility of Results</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Dore, Kelly L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kreuger, Sharyn</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ladhani, Moyez</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rolfson, Darryl</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kurtz, Doris</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kulasegaram, Kulamakan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cullimore, Amie J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Norman, Geoffrey R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Eva, Kevin W</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bates, Stephen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Reiter, Harold I</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Academic Medicine</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Dore, Kelly L</au><au>Kreuger, Sharyn</au><au>Ladhani, Moyez</au><au>Rolfson, Darryl</au><au>Kurtz, Doris</au><au>Kulasegaram, Kulamakan</au><au>Cullimore, Amie J</au><au>Norman, Geoffrey R</au><au>Eva, Kevin W</au><au>Bates, Stephen</au><au>Reiter, Harold I</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The reliability and acceptability of the Multiple Mini-Interview as a selection instrument for postgraduate admissions</atitle><jtitle>Academic Medicine</jtitle><addtitle>Acad Med</addtitle><date>2010-10-01</date><risdate>2010</risdate><volume>85</volume><issue>10 Suppl</issue><spage>S60</spage><epage>S63</epage><pages>S60-S63</pages><issn>1040-2446</issn><eissn>1938-808X</eissn><abstract>The Multiple Mini-Interview (MMI) is useful in selecting undergraduate medical trainees. Postgraduate applicant pools have smaller numbers of more homogeneous candidates that must be actively recruited while being assessed. This paper reports on the MMI's use in assessing residency candidates.
Canadian and international medical graduates to three residency programs--obstetrics-gynecology and pediatrics (McMaster University) and internal medicine (University of Alberta)--underwent the MMI for residency selection (n = 484) in 2008 and 2009. Reliability was determined and candidates and interviewers completed an exit survey assessing acceptability.
Overall reliability of the MMI was acceptable, ranging from 0.55 to 0.72. Using 10 stations would increase reliability to 0.64-0.79. Eighty-eight percent of candidates believed they could accurately portray themselves, while 90% of interviewers believed they could reasonably judge candidates' abilities.
The MMI provides a reliable way to assess residency candidates that is acceptable to both candidates and assessors across a variety of programs.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pmid>20881706</pmid><doi>10.1097/ACM.0b013e3181ed442b</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 1040-2446 |
| ispartof | Academic Medicine, 2010-10, Vol.85 (10 Suppl), p.S60-S63 |
| issn | 1040-2446 1938-808X |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_758832543 |
| source | MEDLINE; Journals@Ovid LWW Legacy Archive; Journals@Ovid Complete; Alma/SFX Local Collection |
| subjects | Adult Alberta College Admission Test Decision Making Education, Medical, Graduate Female Foreign Medical Graduates Gynecology - education Humans Internship and Residency - standards Interview, Psychological - methods Interviews as Topic Male Obstetrics - education Pediatrics - education Professional Competence Reproducibility of Results |
| title | The reliability and acceptability of the Multiple Mini-Interview as a selection instrument for postgraduate admissions |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-18T19%3A14%3A34IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20reliability%20and%20acceptability%20of%20the%20Multiple%20Mini-Interview%20as%20a%20selection%20instrument%20for%20postgraduate%20admissions&rft.jtitle=Academic%20Medicine&rft.au=Dore,%20Kelly%20L&rft.date=2010-10-01&rft.volume=85&rft.issue=10%20Suppl&rft.spage=S60&rft.epage=S63&rft.pages=S60-S63&rft.issn=1040-2446&rft.eissn=1938-808X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1097/ACM.0b013e3181ed442b&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E758832543%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=758832543&rft_id=info:pmid/20881706&rfr_iscdi=true |