Intrauterine contraceptive devices—A reappraisal

The intrauterine contraceptive device (IUD) is a highly effective and safe form of reversible contraception. It does not cause pelvic inflammatory disease, ectopic pregnancy or infertility; it could be used by most nulligravidae; in its latest form it can be used to treat excessive menstrual loss, a...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:British medical bulletin 1993, Vol.49 (1), p.100-123
1. Verfasser: Bromham, D R
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 123
container_issue 1
container_start_page 100
container_title British medical bulletin
container_volume 49
creator Bromham, D R
description The intrauterine contraceptive device (IUD) is a highly effective and safe form of reversible contraception. It does not cause pelvic inflammatory disease, ectopic pregnancy or infertility; it could be used by most nulligravidae; in its latest form it can be used to treat excessive menstrual loss, and it acts by preventing fertilisation not implantation. These statements contrast sharply with many of our long-standing prejudices about the method. New lUDs contribute to this change in perception. Nevertheless, patient selection, limiting use to mutually monogamous relationships, care with fitting and access to expert help with problems (including rare failure pregnancies and removal difficulties) are all required to maintain the acceptability and usefulness of this method.
doi_str_mv 10.1093/oxfordjournals.bmb.a072591
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_75856756</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>75856756</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c383t-ba452a830e3b51c8b3ba8006e692fcdec9c63d96fb381ed98af64c3adc94279a3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkMtKw0AYhQdRar08glBcuEudSzIXd6VYWyi1iELpZphM_kBq08SZpNSdD-ET-iSmNBRcufo5nHP-Ax9CtwT3CVbsvtilhUtWRe02Zu37cR73DRY0UuQEdUkoSCCZIqeoizEWAQkpPkcX3q8wJoxh2UEdyWjIMe0iOtlUztQVuGwDPVvslYWyyrbQS2CbWfA_X9-DngNTls5k3qyv0FnazMJ1ey_R2-jxdTgOps9Pk-FgGlgmWRXEJoyokQwDiyNiZcxiIzHmwBVNbQJWWc4SxdOYSQKJkibloWUmsSqkQhl2ie4Of0tXfNTgK51n3sJ6bTZQ1F6LSEZcRPzfIOFC0oZKE3w4BK0rvHeQ6tJluXGfmmC9J6v_ktUNWd2Sbco37Uod55Acqy3Kxg8OfuYr2B1t4941F0xEerxY6vli-TKfjWaasl8B6YxE</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>16782471</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Intrauterine contraceptive devices—A reappraisal</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Oxford University Press Journals Digital Archive Legacy</source><creator>Bromham, D R</creator><creatorcontrib>Bromham, D R</creatorcontrib><description>The intrauterine contraceptive device (IUD) is a highly effective and safe form of reversible contraception. It does not cause pelvic inflammatory disease, ectopic pregnancy or infertility; it could be used by most nulligravidae; in its latest form it can be used to treat excessive menstrual loss, and it acts by preventing fertilisation not implantation. These statements contrast sharply with many of our long-standing prejudices about the method. New lUDs contribute to this change in perception. Nevertheless, patient selection, limiting use to mutually monogamous relationships, care with fitting and access to expert help with problems (including rare failure pregnancies and removal difficulties) are all required to maintain the acceptability and usefulness of this method.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0007-1420</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1471-8391</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.bmb.a072591</identifier><identifier>PMID: 8324602</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Oxford University Press</publisher><subject>Adolescent ; Adult ; Age Factors ; Bacterial Infections - prevention &amp; control ; Equipment Design ; Female ; Genital Diseases, Female - prevention &amp; control ; Humans ; Intrauterine Devices - adverse effects ; Intrauterine Devices - statistics &amp; numerical data ; Middle Aged ; Pelvic Inflammatory Disease - etiology ; Pregnancy ; Pregnancy, Ectopic</subject><ispartof>British medical bulletin, 1993, Vol.49 (1), p.100-123</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c383t-ba452a830e3b51c8b3ba8006e692fcdec9c63d96fb381ed98af64c3adc94279a3</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,4010,27900,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8324602$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Bromham, D R</creatorcontrib><title>Intrauterine contraceptive devices—A reappraisal</title><title>British medical bulletin</title><addtitle>Br Med Bull</addtitle><description>The intrauterine contraceptive device (IUD) is a highly effective and safe form of reversible contraception. It does not cause pelvic inflammatory disease, ectopic pregnancy or infertility; it could be used by most nulligravidae; in its latest form it can be used to treat excessive menstrual loss, and it acts by preventing fertilisation not implantation. These statements contrast sharply with many of our long-standing prejudices about the method. New lUDs contribute to this change in perception. Nevertheless, patient selection, limiting use to mutually monogamous relationships, care with fitting and access to expert help with problems (including rare failure pregnancies and removal difficulties) are all required to maintain the acceptability and usefulness of this method.</description><subject>Adolescent</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Age Factors</subject><subject>Bacterial Infections - prevention &amp; control</subject><subject>Equipment Design</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Genital Diseases, Female - prevention &amp; control</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Intrauterine Devices - adverse effects</subject><subject>Intrauterine Devices - statistics &amp; numerical data</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Pelvic Inflammatory Disease - etiology</subject><subject>Pregnancy</subject><subject>Pregnancy, Ectopic</subject><issn>0007-1420</issn><issn>1471-8391</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1993</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkMtKw0AYhQdRar08glBcuEudSzIXd6VYWyi1iELpZphM_kBq08SZpNSdD-ET-iSmNBRcufo5nHP-Ax9CtwT3CVbsvtilhUtWRe02Zu37cR73DRY0UuQEdUkoSCCZIqeoizEWAQkpPkcX3q8wJoxh2UEdyWjIMe0iOtlUztQVuGwDPVvslYWyyrbQS2CbWfA_X9-DngNTls5k3qyv0FnazMJ1ey_R2-jxdTgOps9Pk-FgGlgmWRXEJoyokQwDiyNiZcxiIzHmwBVNbQJWWc4SxdOYSQKJkibloWUmsSqkQhl2ie4Of0tXfNTgK51n3sJ6bTZQ1F6LSEZcRPzfIOFC0oZKE3w4BK0rvHeQ6tJluXGfmmC9J6v_ktUNWd2Sbco37Uod55Acqy3Kxg8OfuYr2B1t4941F0xEerxY6vli-TKfjWaasl8B6YxE</recordid><startdate>1993</startdate><enddate>1993</enddate><creator>Bromham, D R</creator><general>Oxford University Press</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7T2</scope><scope>7U2</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>1993</creationdate><title>Intrauterine contraceptive devices—A reappraisal</title><author>Bromham, D R</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c383t-ba452a830e3b51c8b3ba8006e692fcdec9c63d96fb381ed98af64c3adc94279a3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1993</creationdate><topic>Adolescent</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Age Factors</topic><topic>Bacterial Infections - prevention &amp; control</topic><topic>Equipment Design</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Genital Diseases, Female - prevention &amp; control</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Intrauterine Devices - adverse effects</topic><topic>Intrauterine Devices - statistics &amp; numerical data</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Pelvic Inflammatory Disease - etiology</topic><topic>Pregnancy</topic><topic>Pregnancy, Ectopic</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Bromham, D R</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Health and Safety Science Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Safety Science and Risk</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>British medical bulletin</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Bromham, D R</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Intrauterine contraceptive devices—A reappraisal</atitle><jtitle>British medical bulletin</jtitle><addtitle>Br Med Bull</addtitle><date>1993</date><risdate>1993</risdate><volume>49</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>100</spage><epage>123</epage><pages>100-123</pages><issn>0007-1420</issn><eissn>1471-8391</eissn><abstract>The intrauterine contraceptive device (IUD) is a highly effective and safe form of reversible contraception. It does not cause pelvic inflammatory disease, ectopic pregnancy or infertility; it could be used by most nulligravidae; in its latest form it can be used to treat excessive menstrual loss, and it acts by preventing fertilisation not implantation. These statements contrast sharply with many of our long-standing prejudices about the method. New lUDs contribute to this change in perception. Nevertheless, patient selection, limiting use to mutually monogamous relationships, care with fitting and access to expert help with problems (including rare failure pregnancies and removal difficulties) are all required to maintain the acceptability and usefulness of this method.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Oxford University Press</pub><pmid>8324602</pmid><doi>10.1093/oxfordjournals.bmb.a072591</doi><tpages>24</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0007-1420
ispartof British medical bulletin, 1993, Vol.49 (1), p.100-123
issn 0007-1420
1471-8391
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_75856756
source MEDLINE; Oxford University Press Journals Digital Archive Legacy
subjects Adolescent
Adult
Age Factors
Bacterial Infections - prevention & control
Equipment Design
Female
Genital Diseases, Female - prevention & control
Humans
Intrauterine Devices - adverse effects
Intrauterine Devices - statistics & numerical data
Middle Aged
Pelvic Inflammatory Disease - etiology
Pregnancy
Pregnancy, Ectopic
title Intrauterine contraceptive devices—A reappraisal
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-14T11%3A44%3A20IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Intrauterine%20contraceptive%20devices%E2%80%94A%20reappraisal&rft.jtitle=British%20medical%20bulletin&rft.au=Bromham,%20D%20R&rft.date=1993&rft.volume=49&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=100&rft.epage=123&rft.pages=100-123&rft.issn=0007-1420&rft.eissn=1471-8391&rft_id=info:doi/10.1093/oxfordjournals.bmb.a072591&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E75856756%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=16782471&rft_id=info:pmid/8324602&rfr_iscdi=true