Intrauterine contraceptive devices—A reappraisal
The intrauterine contraceptive device (IUD) is a highly effective and safe form of reversible contraception. It does not cause pelvic inflammatory disease, ectopic pregnancy or infertility; it could be used by most nulligravidae; in its latest form it can be used to treat excessive menstrual loss, a...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | British medical bulletin 1993, Vol.49 (1), p.100-123 |
---|---|
1. Verfasser: | |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 123 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 100 |
container_title | British medical bulletin |
container_volume | 49 |
creator | Bromham, D R |
description | The intrauterine contraceptive device (IUD) is a highly effective and safe form of reversible contraception. It does not cause pelvic inflammatory disease, ectopic pregnancy or infertility; it could be used by most nulligravidae; in its latest form it can be used to treat excessive menstrual loss, and it acts by preventing fertilisation not implantation. These statements contrast sharply with many of our long-standing prejudices about the method. New lUDs contribute to this change in perception. Nevertheless, patient selection, limiting use to mutually monogamous relationships, care with fitting and access to expert help with problems (including rare failure pregnancies and removal difficulties) are all required to maintain the acceptability and usefulness of this method. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1093/oxfordjournals.bmb.a072591 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_75856756</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>75856756</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c383t-ba452a830e3b51c8b3ba8006e692fcdec9c63d96fb381ed98af64c3adc94279a3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkMtKw0AYhQdRar08glBcuEudSzIXd6VYWyi1iELpZphM_kBq08SZpNSdD-ET-iSmNBRcufo5nHP-Ax9CtwT3CVbsvtilhUtWRe02Zu37cR73DRY0UuQEdUkoSCCZIqeoizEWAQkpPkcX3q8wJoxh2UEdyWjIMe0iOtlUztQVuGwDPVvslYWyyrbQS2CbWfA_X9-DngNTls5k3qyv0FnazMJ1ey_R2-jxdTgOps9Pk-FgGlgmWRXEJoyokQwDiyNiZcxiIzHmwBVNbQJWWc4SxdOYSQKJkibloWUmsSqkQhl2ie4Of0tXfNTgK51n3sJ6bTZQ1F6LSEZcRPzfIOFC0oZKE3w4BK0rvHeQ6tJluXGfmmC9J6v_ktUNWd2Sbco37Uod55Acqy3Kxg8OfuYr2B1t4941F0xEerxY6vli-TKfjWaasl8B6YxE</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>16782471</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Intrauterine contraceptive devices—A reappraisal</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Oxford University Press Journals Digital Archive Legacy</source><creator>Bromham, D R</creator><creatorcontrib>Bromham, D R</creatorcontrib><description>The intrauterine contraceptive device (IUD) is a highly effective and safe form of reversible contraception. It does not cause pelvic inflammatory disease, ectopic pregnancy or infertility; it could be used by most nulligravidae; in its latest form it can be used to treat excessive menstrual loss, and it acts by preventing fertilisation not implantation. These statements contrast sharply with many of our long-standing prejudices about the method. New lUDs contribute to this change in perception. Nevertheless, patient selection, limiting use to mutually monogamous relationships, care with fitting and access to expert help with problems (including rare failure pregnancies and removal difficulties) are all required to maintain the acceptability and usefulness of this method.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0007-1420</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1471-8391</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.bmb.a072591</identifier><identifier>PMID: 8324602</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Oxford University Press</publisher><subject>Adolescent ; Adult ; Age Factors ; Bacterial Infections - prevention & control ; Equipment Design ; Female ; Genital Diseases, Female - prevention & control ; Humans ; Intrauterine Devices - adverse effects ; Intrauterine Devices - statistics & numerical data ; Middle Aged ; Pelvic Inflammatory Disease - etiology ; Pregnancy ; Pregnancy, Ectopic</subject><ispartof>British medical bulletin, 1993, Vol.49 (1), p.100-123</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c383t-ba452a830e3b51c8b3ba8006e692fcdec9c63d96fb381ed98af64c3adc94279a3</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,4010,27900,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8324602$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Bromham, D R</creatorcontrib><title>Intrauterine contraceptive devices—A reappraisal</title><title>British medical bulletin</title><addtitle>Br Med Bull</addtitle><description>The intrauterine contraceptive device (IUD) is a highly effective and safe form of reversible contraception. It does not cause pelvic inflammatory disease, ectopic pregnancy or infertility; it could be used by most nulligravidae; in its latest form it can be used to treat excessive menstrual loss, and it acts by preventing fertilisation not implantation. These statements contrast sharply with many of our long-standing prejudices about the method. New lUDs contribute to this change in perception. Nevertheless, patient selection, limiting use to mutually monogamous relationships, care with fitting and access to expert help with problems (including rare failure pregnancies and removal difficulties) are all required to maintain the acceptability and usefulness of this method.</description><subject>Adolescent</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Age Factors</subject><subject>Bacterial Infections - prevention & control</subject><subject>Equipment Design</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Genital Diseases, Female - prevention & control</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Intrauterine Devices - adverse effects</subject><subject>Intrauterine Devices - statistics & numerical data</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Pelvic Inflammatory Disease - etiology</subject><subject>Pregnancy</subject><subject>Pregnancy, Ectopic</subject><issn>0007-1420</issn><issn>1471-8391</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1993</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkMtKw0AYhQdRar08glBcuEudSzIXd6VYWyi1iELpZphM_kBq08SZpNSdD-ET-iSmNBRcufo5nHP-Ax9CtwT3CVbsvtilhUtWRe02Zu37cR73DRY0UuQEdUkoSCCZIqeoizEWAQkpPkcX3q8wJoxh2UEdyWjIMe0iOtlUztQVuGwDPVvslYWyyrbQS2CbWfA_X9-DngNTls5k3qyv0FnazMJ1ey_R2-jxdTgOps9Pk-FgGlgmWRXEJoyokQwDiyNiZcxiIzHmwBVNbQJWWc4SxdOYSQKJkibloWUmsSqkQhl2ie4Of0tXfNTgK51n3sJ6bTZQ1F6LSEZcRPzfIOFC0oZKE3w4BK0rvHeQ6tJluXGfmmC9J6v_ktUNWd2Sbco37Uod55Acqy3Kxg8OfuYr2B1t4941F0xEerxY6vli-TKfjWaasl8B6YxE</recordid><startdate>1993</startdate><enddate>1993</enddate><creator>Bromham, D R</creator><general>Oxford University Press</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7T2</scope><scope>7U2</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>1993</creationdate><title>Intrauterine contraceptive devices—A reappraisal</title><author>Bromham, D R</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c383t-ba452a830e3b51c8b3ba8006e692fcdec9c63d96fb381ed98af64c3adc94279a3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1993</creationdate><topic>Adolescent</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Age Factors</topic><topic>Bacterial Infections - prevention & control</topic><topic>Equipment Design</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Genital Diseases, Female - prevention & control</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Intrauterine Devices - adverse effects</topic><topic>Intrauterine Devices - statistics & numerical data</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Pelvic Inflammatory Disease - etiology</topic><topic>Pregnancy</topic><topic>Pregnancy, Ectopic</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Bromham, D R</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Health and Safety Science Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Safety Science and Risk</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>British medical bulletin</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Bromham, D R</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Intrauterine contraceptive devices—A reappraisal</atitle><jtitle>British medical bulletin</jtitle><addtitle>Br Med Bull</addtitle><date>1993</date><risdate>1993</risdate><volume>49</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>100</spage><epage>123</epage><pages>100-123</pages><issn>0007-1420</issn><eissn>1471-8391</eissn><abstract>The intrauterine contraceptive device (IUD) is a highly effective and safe form of reversible contraception. It does not cause pelvic inflammatory disease, ectopic pregnancy or infertility; it could be used by most nulligravidae; in its latest form it can be used to treat excessive menstrual loss, and it acts by preventing fertilisation not implantation. These statements contrast sharply with many of our long-standing prejudices about the method. New lUDs contribute to this change in perception. Nevertheless, patient selection, limiting use to mutually monogamous relationships, care with fitting and access to expert help with problems (including rare failure pregnancies and removal difficulties) are all required to maintain the acceptability and usefulness of this method.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Oxford University Press</pub><pmid>8324602</pmid><doi>10.1093/oxfordjournals.bmb.a072591</doi><tpages>24</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0007-1420 |
ispartof | British medical bulletin, 1993, Vol.49 (1), p.100-123 |
issn | 0007-1420 1471-8391 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_75856756 |
source | MEDLINE; Oxford University Press Journals Digital Archive Legacy |
subjects | Adolescent Adult Age Factors Bacterial Infections - prevention & control Equipment Design Female Genital Diseases, Female - prevention & control Humans Intrauterine Devices - adverse effects Intrauterine Devices - statistics & numerical data Middle Aged Pelvic Inflammatory Disease - etiology Pregnancy Pregnancy, Ectopic |
title | Intrauterine contraceptive devices—A reappraisal |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-14T11%3A44%3A20IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Intrauterine%20contraceptive%20devices%E2%80%94A%20reappraisal&rft.jtitle=British%20medical%20bulletin&rft.au=Bromham,%20D%20R&rft.date=1993&rft.volume=49&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=100&rft.epage=123&rft.pages=100-123&rft.issn=0007-1420&rft.eissn=1471-8391&rft_id=info:doi/10.1093/oxfordjournals.bmb.a072591&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E75856756%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=16782471&rft_id=info:pmid/8324602&rfr_iscdi=true |