Use of Barcoded Pyrosequencing and Shared OTUs To Determine Sources of Fecal Bacteria in Watersheds
While many current microbial source tracking (MST) methods rely on the use of specific molecular marker genes to identify sources of fecal contamination, these methods often fail to determine all point and nonpoint contributors of fecal inputs into waterways. In this study, we developed a new librar...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Environmental science & technology 2010-10, Vol.44 (20), p.7777-7782 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 7782 |
---|---|
container_issue | 20 |
container_start_page | 7777 |
container_title | Environmental science & technology |
container_volume | 44 |
creator | Unno, Tatsuya Jang, Jeonghwan Han, Dukki Kim, Joon Ha Sadowsky, Michael J Kim, Ok-Sun Chun, Jongsik Hur, Hor-Gil |
description | While many current microbial source tracking (MST) methods rely on the use of specific molecular marker genes to identify sources of fecal contamination, these methods often fail to determine all point and nonpoint contributors of fecal inputs into waterways. In this study, we developed a new library-dependent MST method that uses pyrosequencing-derived shared operational taxonomy units (OTUs) to define sources of fecal contamination in waterways. A total 56,841 pyrosequencing reads of 16S rDNA obtained from the feces of humans and animals were evaluated and used to compare fecal microbial diversity in three freshwater samples obtained from the Yeongsan river basin in Jeonnam Province, South Korea. Sites included an urbanized agricultural area (Y1) (Escherichia coli counts ≥1600 CFU/100 mL), an open area (Y2) with no major industrial activities (940 CFU/100 mL), and a typical agricultural area (Y3) (≥1600 CFU/100 mL). Data analyses indicated that the majority of bacteria in the feces of humans and domesticated animals were comprised of members of the phyla Bacteroidetes or Firmicutes, whereas the majority of bacteria in wild goose feces and freshwater samples were classified to the phylum Proteobacteria. Analysis of OTUs shared between the fecal and environmental samples suggested that the potential sources of the fecal contamination at the sites were of human and swine origin. Quantification of fecal contamination was also examined by comparing the density of pyrosequencing reads in each fecal sample within shared OTUs. Taken together, our results indicated that analysis of shared OTUs derived from barcoded pyrosequencing reads provide the necessary resolution and discrimination to be useful as a next generation platform for microbial source tracking studies. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1021/es101500z |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_758135689</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2191299331</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a437t-462bbc5980f57951d5aad1d353ee133291b76b81edda41796de60a4a3b1530533</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNplkMFO3DAQhq2qVdluOfAClYWEqh5CZ-I4cY6FlrYSEkjsCm7RxJ6UoN2EenYP8PT1ioWV6MmW5vPv-T-lDhCOEXL8yoKAFuDxjZqgzSGzzuJbNQFAk9WmvNlTH0TuACA34N6rvRycNS4vJsrPhfXY6ROKfgwc9OVDHIX_rnnw_fBH0xD01S3FNLmYzUXPRv2dVxyX_cD6alxHz7J5f8aeFinFp1lPuh_0NaWr3HKQj-pdRwvh_e05VfOzH7PTX9n5xc_fp9_OMypMtcqKMm9bb2sHna1qi8ESBQzGGmY0Jq-xrcrWIYdABVZ1GbgEKsi0aA1YY6bq81PufRxTAVk1y148LxY08LiWprIOjS1dncjDV-RdqjKk5Rq3cWRsMjdVX54gn4xI5K65j_2S4kOD0Gy8Ny_eE_tpG7hulxxeyGfRCTjaAiTJVBcp-ZUdl_qBK82OIy-7pf7_8B-ZwpRY</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>802303501</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Use of Barcoded Pyrosequencing and Shared OTUs To Determine Sources of Fecal Bacteria in Watersheds</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>American Chemical Society Journals</source><creator>Unno, Tatsuya ; Jang, Jeonghwan ; Han, Dukki ; Kim, Joon Ha ; Sadowsky, Michael J ; Kim, Ok-Sun ; Chun, Jongsik ; Hur, Hor-Gil</creator><creatorcontrib>Unno, Tatsuya ; Jang, Jeonghwan ; Han, Dukki ; Kim, Joon Ha ; Sadowsky, Michael J ; Kim, Ok-Sun ; Chun, Jongsik ; Hur, Hor-Gil</creatorcontrib><description>While many current microbial source tracking (MST) methods rely on the use of specific molecular marker genes to identify sources of fecal contamination, these methods often fail to determine all point and nonpoint contributors of fecal inputs into waterways. In this study, we developed a new library-dependent MST method that uses pyrosequencing-derived shared operational taxonomy units (OTUs) to define sources of fecal contamination in waterways. A total 56,841 pyrosequencing reads of 16S rDNA obtained from the feces of humans and animals were evaluated and used to compare fecal microbial diversity in three freshwater samples obtained from the Yeongsan river basin in Jeonnam Province, South Korea. Sites included an urbanized agricultural area (Y1) (Escherichia coli counts ≥1600 CFU/100 mL), an open area (Y2) with no major industrial activities (940 CFU/100 mL), and a typical agricultural area (Y3) (≥1600 CFU/100 mL). Data analyses indicated that the majority of bacteria in the feces of humans and domesticated animals were comprised of members of the phyla Bacteroidetes or Firmicutes, whereas the majority of bacteria in wild goose feces and freshwater samples were classified to the phylum Proteobacteria. Analysis of OTUs shared between the fecal and environmental samples suggested that the potential sources of the fecal contamination at the sites were of human and swine origin. Quantification of fecal contamination was also examined by comparing the density of pyrosequencing reads in each fecal sample within shared OTUs. Taken together, our results indicated that analysis of shared OTUs derived from barcoded pyrosequencing reads provide the necessary resolution and discrimination to be useful as a next generation platform for microbial source tracking studies.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0013-936X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1520-5851</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1021/es101500z</identifier><identifier>PMID: 20853824</identifier><identifier>CODEN: ESTHAG</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Washington, DC: American Chemical Society</publisher><subject>Applied sciences ; Automatic Data Processing ; Bacteria ; Bacteria - classification ; Bacteria - isolation & purification ; Biomarkers ; Characterization of Natural and Affected Environments ; Exact sciences and technology ; Feces ; Feces - microbiology ; Genes ; Pollution ; Republic of Korea ; Ribosomal DNA ; River basins ; Species Specificity ; Water Microbiology ; Watersheds</subject><ispartof>Environmental science & technology, 2010-10, Vol.44 (20), p.7777-7782</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2010 American Chemical Society</rights><rights>2015 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright American Chemical Society Oct 15, 2010</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a437t-462bbc5980f57951d5aad1d353ee133291b76b81edda41796de60a4a3b1530533</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-a437t-462bbc5980f57951d5aad1d353ee133291b76b81edda41796de60a4a3b1530533</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://pubs.acs.org/doi/pdf/10.1021/es101500z$$EPDF$$P50$$Gacs$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/es101500z$$EHTML$$P50$$Gacs$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,2751,27055,27903,27904,56716,56766</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=23320863$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20853824$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Unno, Tatsuya</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jang, Jeonghwan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Han, Dukki</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kim, Joon Ha</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sadowsky, Michael J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kim, Ok-Sun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chun, Jongsik</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hur, Hor-Gil</creatorcontrib><title>Use of Barcoded Pyrosequencing and Shared OTUs To Determine Sources of Fecal Bacteria in Watersheds</title><title>Environmental science & technology</title><addtitle>Environ. Sci. Technol</addtitle><description>While many current microbial source tracking (MST) methods rely on the use of specific molecular marker genes to identify sources of fecal contamination, these methods often fail to determine all point and nonpoint contributors of fecal inputs into waterways. In this study, we developed a new library-dependent MST method that uses pyrosequencing-derived shared operational taxonomy units (OTUs) to define sources of fecal contamination in waterways. A total 56,841 pyrosequencing reads of 16S rDNA obtained from the feces of humans and animals were evaluated and used to compare fecal microbial diversity in three freshwater samples obtained from the Yeongsan river basin in Jeonnam Province, South Korea. Sites included an urbanized agricultural area (Y1) (Escherichia coli counts ≥1600 CFU/100 mL), an open area (Y2) with no major industrial activities (940 CFU/100 mL), and a typical agricultural area (Y3) (≥1600 CFU/100 mL). Data analyses indicated that the majority of bacteria in the feces of humans and domesticated animals were comprised of members of the phyla Bacteroidetes or Firmicutes, whereas the majority of bacteria in wild goose feces and freshwater samples were classified to the phylum Proteobacteria. Analysis of OTUs shared between the fecal and environmental samples suggested that the potential sources of the fecal contamination at the sites were of human and swine origin. Quantification of fecal contamination was also examined by comparing the density of pyrosequencing reads in each fecal sample within shared OTUs. Taken together, our results indicated that analysis of shared OTUs derived from barcoded pyrosequencing reads provide the necessary resolution and discrimination to be useful as a next generation platform for microbial source tracking studies.</description><subject>Applied sciences</subject><subject>Automatic Data Processing</subject><subject>Bacteria</subject><subject>Bacteria - classification</subject><subject>Bacteria - isolation & purification</subject><subject>Biomarkers</subject><subject>Characterization of Natural and Affected Environments</subject><subject>Exact sciences and technology</subject><subject>Feces</subject><subject>Feces - microbiology</subject><subject>Genes</subject><subject>Pollution</subject><subject>Republic of Korea</subject><subject>Ribosomal DNA</subject><subject>River basins</subject><subject>Species Specificity</subject><subject>Water Microbiology</subject><subject>Watersheds</subject><issn>0013-936X</issn><issn>1520-5851</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2010</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNplkMFO3DAQhq2qVdluOfAClYWEqh5CZ-I4cY6FlrYSEkjsCm7RxJ6UoN2EenYP8PT1ioWV6MmW5vPv-T-lDhCOEXL8yoKAFuDxjZqgzSGzzuJbNQFAk9WmvNlTH0TuACA34N6rvRycNS4vJsrPhfXY6ROKfgwc9OVDHIX_rnnw_fBH0xD01S3FNLmYzUXPRv2dVxyX_cD6alxHz7J5f8aeFinFp1lPuh_0NaWr3HKQj-pdRwvh_e05VfOzH7PTX9n5xc_fp9_OMypMtcqKMm9bb2sHna1qi8ESBQzGGmY0Jq-xrcrWIYdABVZ1GbgEKsi0aA1YY6bq81PufRxTAVk1y148LxY08LiWprIOjS1dncjDV-RdqjKk5Rq3cWRsMjdVX54gn4xI5K65j_2S4kOD0Gy8Ny_eE_tpG7hulxxeyGfRCTjaAiTJVBcp-ZUdl_qBK82OIy-7pf7_8B-ZwpRY</recordid><startdate>20101015</startdate><enddate>20101015</enddate><creator>Unno, Tatsuya</creator><creator>Jang, Jeonghwan</creator><creator>Han, Dukki</creator><creator>Kim, Joon Ha</creator><creator>Sadowsky, Michael J</creator><creator>Kim, Ok-Sun</creator><creator>Chun, Jongsik</creator><creator>Hur, Hor-Gil</creator><general>American Chemical Society</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>7U7</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>SOI</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20101015</creationdate><title>Use of Barcoded Pyrosequencing and Shared OTUs To Determine Sources of Fecal Bacteria in Watersheds</title><author>Unno, Tatsuya ; Jang, Jeonghwan ; Han, Dukki ; Kim, Joon Ha ; Sadowsky, Michael J ; Kim, Ok-Sun ; Chun, Jongsik ; Hur, Hor-Gil</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a437t-462bbc5980f57951d5aad1d353ee133291b76b81edda41796de60a4a3b1530533</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2010</creationdate><topic>Applied sciences</topic><topic>Automatic Data Processing</topic><topic>Bacteria</topic><topic>Bacteria - classification</topic><topic>Bacteria - isolation & purification</topic><topic>Biomarkers</topic><topic>Characterization of Natural and Affected Environments</topic><topic>Exact sciences and technology</topic><topic>Feces</topic><topic>Feces - microbiology</topic><topic>Genes</topic><topic>Pollution</topic><topic>Republic of Korea</topic><topic>Ribosomal DNA</topic><topic>River basins</topic><topic>Species Specificity</topic><topic>Water Microbiology</topic><topic>Watersheds</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Unno, Tatsuya</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jang, Jeonghwan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Han, Dukki</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kim, Joon Ha</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sadowsky, Michael J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kim, Ok-Sun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chun, Jongsik</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hur, Hor-Gil</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Toxicology Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Environmental science & technology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Unno, Tatsuya</au><au>Jang, Jeonghwan</au><au>Han, Dukki</au><au>Kim, Joon Ha</au><au>Sadowsky, Michael J</au><au>Kim, Ok-Sun</au><au>Chun, Jongsik</au><au>Hur, Hor-Gil</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Use of Barcoded Pyrosequencing and Shared OTUs To Determine Sources of Fecal Bacteria in Watersheds</atitle><jtitle>Environmental science & technology</jtitle><addtitle>Environ. Sci. Technol</addtitle><date>2010-10-15</date><risdate>2010</risdate><volume>44</volume><issue>20</issue><spage>7777</spage><epage>7782</epage><pages>7777-7782</pages><issn>0013-936X</issn><eissn>1520-5851</eissn><coden>ESTHAG</coden><abstract>While many current microbial source tracking (MST) methods rely on the use of specific molecular marker genes to identify sources of fecal contamination, these methods often fail to determine all point and nonpoint contributors of fecal inputs into waterways. In this study, we developed a new library-dependent MST method that uses pyrosequencing-derived shared operational taxonomy units (OTUs) to define sources of fecal contamination in waterways. A total 56,841 pyrosequencing reads of 16S rDNA obtained from the feces of humans and animals were evaluated and used to compare fecal microbial diversity in three freshwater samples obtained from the Yeongsan river basin in Jeonnam Province, South Korea. Sites included an urbanized agricultural area (Y1) (Escherichia coli counts ≥1600 CFU/100 mL), an open area (Y2) with no major industrial activities (940 CFU/100 mL), and a typical agricultural area (Y3) (≥1600 CFU/100 mL). Data analyses indicated that the majority of bacteria in the feces of humans and domesticated animals were comprised of members of the phyla Bacteroidetes or Firmicutes, whereas the majority of bacteria in wild goose feces and freshwater samples were classified to the phylum Proteobacteria. Analysis of OTUs shared between the fecal and environmental samples suggested that the potential sources of the fecal contamination at the sites were of human and swine origin. Quantification of fecal contamination was also examined by comparing the density of pyrosequencing reads in each fecal sample within shared OTUs. Taken together, our results indicated that analysis of shared OTUs derived from barcoded pyrosequencing reads provide the necessary resolution and discrimination to be useful as a next generation platform for microbial source tracking studies.</abstract><cop>Washington, DC</cop><pub>American Chemical Society</pub><pmid>20853824</pmid><doi>10.1021/es101500z</doi><tpages>6</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0013-936X |
ispartof | Environmental science & technology, 2010-10, Vol.44 (20), p.7777-7782 |
issn | 0013-936X 1520-5851 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_758135689 |
source | MEDLINE; American Chemical Society Journals |
subjects | Applied sciences Automatic Data Processing Bacteria Bacteria - classification Bacteria - isolation & purification Biomarkers Characterization of Natural and Affected Environments Exact sciences and technology Feces Feces - microbiology Genes Pollution Republic of Korea Ribosomal DNA River basins Species Specificity Water Microbiology Watersheds |
title | Use of Barcoded Pyrosequencing and Shared OTUs To Determine Sources of Fecal Bacteria in Watersheds |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-24T06%3A33%3A09IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Use%20of%20Barcoded%20Pyrosequencing%20and%20Shared%20OTUs%20To%20Determine%20Sources%20of%20Fecal%20Bacteria%20in%20Watersheds&rft.jtitle=Environmental%20science%20&%20technology&rft.au=Unno,%20Tatsuya&rft.date=2010-10-15&rft.volume=44&rft.issue=20&rft.spage=7777&rft.epage=7782&rft.pages=7777-7782&rft.issn=0013-936X&rft.eissn=1520-5851&rft.coden=ESTHAG&rft_id=info:doi/10.1021/es101500z&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2191299331%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=802303501&rft_id=info:pmid/20853824&rfr_iscdi=true |