An analysis of the effect of pre-incentives and post-incentives based on draws on response to web surveys
Most analyses of the effect of incentives on response rates have attempted to extrapolate to the Internet the already existing broad knowledge base of methodologies for personal surveys by telephone and post. However, such knowledge about existing methods is not directly applicable to the Internet-b...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Quality & quantity 2010-02, Vol.44 (2), p.357-373 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 373 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 2 |
| container_start_page | 357 |
| container_title | Quality & quantity |
| container_volume | 44 |
| creator | Sánchez-Fernández, Juan Muñoz-Leiva, Francisco Montoro-Ríos, Francisco J. Ibáñez-Zapata, José Ángel |
| description | Most analyses of the effect of incentives on response rates have attempted to extrapolate to the Internet the already existing broad knowledge base of methodologies for personal surveys by telephone and post. However, such knowledge about existing methods is not directly applicable to the Internet-based interviews. This study therefore examines the manner in which different combinations of incentives can affect response to a survey over the Internet. With such a purpose incentives have been chosen based on draws that has been administered under the pre-incentives philosophy (giving the possibility to participate in a draw, independently that the questionnaire was stuffed or not) or post-incentives (giving the possibility to participate in a draw only those that stuffed the questionnaire). A surprising result is that the joint use of pre-incentives and post-incentives slightly improves response rates, although it also causes rates to be considerably lower than when these incentives are used separately. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s11135-008-9197-4 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_758121293</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>743810239</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c379t-528f2755beb582f0012df38a565238b9b074c7250f9339b5971b4b301edfea913</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkctKAzEUhoMoWC8P4C64cRXNZdJMliLeQHCj65DMnOiUdjLmTFv69qZUUARxlQvf93M4PyFngl8Kzs0VCiGUZpzXzAprWLVHJkIbxUxd6X0y4VwppoUxh-QIccZ5sSozId11T33v5xvskKZIx3egECM04_Y1ZGBd30A_divAArZ0SDj-_AseoaWpp232a9xeMuCQegQ6JrqGQHGZV7DBE3IQ_Rzh9Os8Jq93ty83D-zp-f7x5vqJNcrYkWlZR2m0DhB0LWMZVLZR1V5PtVR1sIGbqjFS82iVskFbI0IVFBfQRvBWqGNyscsdcvpYAo5u0WED87nvIS3RGV0LKWSx_yUrVQsulS3k-S9ylpa5rA2d5MpwPTWmQGIHNTkhZohuyN3C540T3G1LcruSXCnJbUtyVXHkzsHC9m-Qv4P_lj4BTs-Tmw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>203705677</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>An analysis of the effect of pre-incentives and post-incentives based on draws on response to web surveys</title><source>Springer Nature - Complete Springer Journals</source><source>Sociological Abstracts</source><creator>Sánchez-Fernández, Juan ; Muñoz-Leiva, Francisco ; Montoro-Ríos, Francisco J. ; Ibáñez-Zapata, José Ángel</creator><creatorcontrib>Sánchez-Fernández, Juan ; Muñoz-Leiva, Francisco ; Montoro-Ríos, Francisco J. ; Ibáñez-Zapata, José Ángel</creatorcontrib><description>Most analyses of the effect of incentives on response rates have attempted to extrapolate to the Internet the already existing broad knowledge base of methodologies for personal surveys by telephone and post. However, such knowledge about existing methods is not directly applicable to the Internet-based interviews. This study therefore examines the manner in which different combinations of incentives can affect response to a survey over the Internet. With such a purpose incentives have been chosen based on draws that has been administered under the pre-incentives philosophy (giving the possibility to participate in a draw, independently that the questionnaire was stuffed or not) or post-incentives (giving the possibility to participate in a draw only those that stuffed the questionnaire). A surprising result is that the joint use of pre-incentives and post-incentives slightly improves response rates, although it also causes rates to be considerably lower than when these incentives are used separately.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0033-5177</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1573-7845</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s11135-008-9197-4</identifier><identifier>CODEN: QQEJAV</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands</publisher><subject>Economic incentives ; Incentives ; Internet ; Internet access ; Interviews ; Knowledge ; Methodology ; Methodology of the Social Sciences ; Questionnaires ; Research methods ; Research Note ; Response rates ; Social Sciences ; Surveys ; Websites</subject><ispartof>Quality & quantity, 2010-02, Vol.44 (2), p.357-373</ispartof><rights>Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2008</rights><rights>Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2010</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c379t-528f2755beb582f0012df38a565238b9b074c7250f9339b5971b4b301edfea913</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c379t-528f2755beb582f0012df38a565238b9b074c7250f9339b5971b4b301edfea913</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s11135-008-9197-4$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11135-008-9197-4$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27321,27901,27902,33751,33752,41464,42533,51294</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Sánchez-Fernández, Juan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Muñoz-Leiva, Francisco</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Montoro-Ríos, Francisco J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ibáñez-Zapata, José Ángel</creatorcontrib><title>An analysis of the effect of pre-incentives and post-incentives based on draws on response to web surveys</title><title>Quality & quantity</title><addtitle>Qual Quant</addtitle><description>Most analyses of the effect of incentives on response rates have attempted to extrapolate to the Internet the already existing broad knowledge base of methodologies for personal surveys by telephone and post. However, such knowledge about existing methods is not directly applicable to the Internet-based interviews. This study therefore examines the manner in which different combinations of incentives can affect response to a survey over the Internet. With such a purpose incentives have been chosen based on draws that has been administered under the pre-incentives philosophy (giving the possibility to participate in a draw, independently that the questionnaire was stuffed or not) or post-incentives (giving the possibility to participate in a draw only those that stuffed the questionnaire). A surprising result is that the joint use of pre-incentives and post-incentives slightly improves response rates, although it also causes rates to be considerably lower than when these incentives are used separately.</description><subject>Economic incentives</subject><subject>Incentives</subject><subject>Internet</subject><subject>Internet access</subject><subject>Interviews</subject><subject>Knowledge</subject><subject>Methodology</subject><subject>Methodology of the Social Sciences</subject><subject>Questionnaires</subject><subject>Research methods</subject><subject>Research Note</subject><subject>Response rates</subject><subject>Social Sciences</subject><subject>Surveys</subject><subject>Websites</subject><issn>0033-5177</issn><issn>1573-7845</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2010</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>BHHNA</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkctKAzEUhoMoWC8P4C64cRXNZdJMliLeQHCj65DMnOiUdjLmTFv69qZUUARxlQvf93M4PyFngl8Kzs0VCiGUZpzXzAprWLVHJkIbxUxd6X0y4VwppoUxh-QIccZ5sSozId11T33v5xvskKZIx3egECM04_Y1ZGBd30A_divAArZ0SDj-_AseoaWpp232a9xeMuCQegQ6JrqGQHGZV7DBE3IQ_Rzh9Os8Jq93ty83D-zp-f7x5vqJNcrYkWlZR2m0DhB0LWMZVLZR1V5PtVR1sIGbqjFS82iVskFbI0IVFBfQRvBWqGNyscsdcvpYAo5u0WED87nvIS3RGV0LKWSx_yUrVQsulS3k-S9ylpa5rA2d5MpwPTWmQGIHNTkhZohuyN3C540T3G1LcruSXCnJbUtyVXHkzsHC9m-Qv4P_lj4BTs-Tmw</recordid><startdate>20100201</startdate><enddate>20100201</enddate><creator>Sánchez-Fernández, Juan</creator><creator>Muñoz-Leiva, Francisco</creator><creator>Montoro-Ríos, Francisco J.</creator><creator>Ibáñez-Zapata, José Ángel</creator><general>Springer Netherlands</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7U4</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>87Z</scope><scope>88G</scope><scope>88J</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>BHHNA</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWI</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>HEHIP</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>M2M</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2R</scope><scope>M2S</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>WZK</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20100201</creationdate><title>An analysis of the effect of pre-incentives and post-incentives based on draws on response to web surveys</title><author>Sánchez-Fernández, Juan ; Muñoz-Leiva, Francisco ; Montoro-Ríos, Francisco J. ; Ibáñez-Zapata, José Ángel</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c379t-528f2755beb582f0012df38a565238b9b074c7250f9339b5971b4b301edfea913</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2010</creationdate><topic>Economic incentives</topic><topic>Incentives</topic><topic>Internet</topic><topic>Internet access</topic><topic>Interviews</topic><topic>Knowledge</topic><topic>Methodology</topic><topic>Methodology of the Social Sciences</topic><topic>Questionnaires</topic><topic>Research methods</topic><topic>Research Note</topic><topic>Response rates</topic><topic>Social Sciences</topic><topic>Surveys</topic><topic>Websites</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Sánchez-Fernández, Juan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Muñoz-Leiva, Francisco</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Montoro-Ríos, Francisco J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ibáñez-Zapata, José Ángel</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (pre-2017)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Psychology Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Social Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>Sociology Collection</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global</collection><collection>ProQuest Psychology</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Social Science Database</collection><collection>Sociology Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (Ovid)</collection><jtitle>Quality & quantity</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Sánchez-Fernández, Juan</au><au>Muñoz-Leiva, Francisco</au><au>Montoro-Ríos, Francisco J.</au><au>Ibáñez-Zapata, José Ángel</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>An analysis of the effect of pre-incentives and post-incentives based on draws on response to web surveys</atitle><jtitle>Quality & quantity</jtitle><stitle>Qual Quant</stitle><date>2010-02-01</date><risdate>2010</risdate><volume>44</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>357</spage><epage>373</epage><pages>357-373</pages><issn>0033-5177</issn><eissn>1573-7845</eissn><coden>QQEJAV</coden><abstract>Most analyses of the effect of incentives on response rates have attempted to extrapolate to the Internet the already existing broad knowledge base of methodologies for personal surveys by telephone and post. However, such knowledge about existing methods is not directly applicable to the Internet-based interviews. This study therefore examines the manner in which different combinations of incentives can affect response to a survey over the Internet. With such a purpose incentives have been chosen based on draws that has been administered under the pre-incentives philosophy (giving the possibility to participate in a draw, independently that the questionnaire was stuffed or not) or post-incentives (giving the possibility to participate in a draw only those that stuffed the questionnaire). A surprising result is that the joint use of pre-incentives and post-incentives slightly improves response rates, although it also causes rates to be considerably lower than when these incentives are used separately.</abstract><cop>Dordrecht</cop><pub>Springer Netherlands</pub><doi>10.1007/s11135-008-9197-4</doi><tpages>17</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0033-5177 |
| ispartof | Quality & quantity, 2010-02, Vol.44 (2), p.357-373 |
| issn | 0033-5177 1573-7845 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_758121293 |
| source | Springer Nature - Complete Springer Journals; Sociological Abstracts |
| subjects | Economic incentives Incentives Internet Internet access Interviews Knowledge Methodology Methodology of the Social Sciences Questionnaires Research methods Research Note Response rates Social Sciences Surveys Websites |
| title | An analysis of the effect of pre-incentives and post-incentives based on draws on response to web surveys |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-13T21%3A42%3A29IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=An%20analysis%20of%20the%20effect%20of%20pre-incentives%20and%20post-incentives%20based%20on%20draws%20on%20response%20to%20web%20surveys&rft.jtitle=Quality%20&%20quantity&rft.au=S%C3%A1nchez-Fern%C3%A1ndez,%20Juan&rft.date=2010-02-01&rft.volume=44&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=357&rft.epage=373&rft.pages=357-373&rft.issn=0033-5177&rft.eissn=1573-7845&rft.coden=QQEJAV&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s11135-008-9197-4&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E743810239%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=203705677&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |