Compliance, resistance and seduction: reflections on 20NByears of the funding council model of governance

Formally the new public management model of governance was introduced into British higher education with the passage of the 1988 Education Reform Act, which abolished the existing University Grants Committee (UGC) and instigated the funding councils. This article explores the relationship between th...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Higher education 2010-11, Vol.60 (5), p.543-557
Hauptverfasser: Filippakou, Ourania, Salter, Brian, Tapper, Ted
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 557
container_issue 5
container_start_page 543
container_title Higher education
container_volume 60
creator Filippakou, Ourania
Salter, Brian
Tapper, Ted
description Formally the new public management model of governance was introduced into British higher education with the passage of the 1988 Education Reform Act, which abolished the existing University Grants Committee (UGC) and instigated the funding councils. This article explores the relationship between the state, the funding councils and the universities with respect to the contemporary development of the English system of higher education. The analysis is based on an exploration of four key policy issues: the quality assurance regime, the research assessment exercises, the widening participation agenda and the introduction of student fees. The goal is to explore how the quasi-state organisations-in particular the Higher Education Funding Council for England (HEFCE)-have mediated the relationship between the state and the universities. The evidence suggests that the coupling of the state to the universities follows one of three tracks: compliance, resistance and seduction. The article explores what factors determine why one relationship (or combination of relationships) prevails, and explains patterns of change over time. The overall conclusion is that institutional interaction is very complex, and it is inaccurate-as is sometimes claimed-to view the funding council as little more than a compliant channel of government policy. Adapted from the source document.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s10734-010-9314-x
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_758116568</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>758116568</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-proquest_miscellaneous_7581165683</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNjLtOAzEQRV2AlPD4ALrpaDDMZLMPUhKBqKjoI8s7mxh5x2FnHcHfk0X5gFT3XJ2ra8wd4SMh1k9KWBdLi4T2uaCl_bkwc0RqLJUVzsyV6hciLqgs5iasU7-PwYnnBxhYg44Tg5MWlNvsx5BkdTRd5H9WSAIL_Hj5ZTccSwfjjqHL0gbZgk9ZfIjQp5bjJLfpwINMlzfmsnNR-faU1-b-7fVz_W73Q_rOrOOmD-o5Riecsm7qsiGqyqopzl_-AalXUIo</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>758116568</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Compliance, resistance and seduction: reflections on 20NByears of the funding council model of governance</title><source>PAIS Index</source><source>JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing</source><source>EBSCOhost Education Source</source><source>SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings</source><creator>Filippakou, Ourania ; Salter, Brian ; Tapper, Ted</creator><creatorcontrib>Filippakou, Ourania ; Salter, Brian ; Tapper, Ted</creatorcontrib><description>Formally the new public management model of governance was introduced into British higher education with the passage of the 1988 Education Reform Act, which abolished the existing University Grants Committee (UGC) and instigated the funding councils. This article explores the relationship between the state, the funding councils and the universities with respect to the contemporary development of the English system of higher education. The analysis is based on an exploration of four key policy issues: the quality assurance regime, the research assessment exercises, the widening participation agenda and the introduction of student fees. The goal is to explore how the quasi-state organisations-in particular the Higher Education Funding Council for England (HEFCE)-have mediated the relationship between the state and the universities. The evidence suggests that the coupling of the state to the universities follows one of three tracks: compliance, resistance and seduction. The article explores what factors determine why one relationship (or combination of relationships) prevails, and explains patterns of change over time. The overall conclusion is that institutional interaction is very complex, and it is inaccurate-as is sometimes claimed-to view the funding council as little more than a compliant channel of government policy. Adapted from the source document.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0018-1560</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s10734-010-9314-x</identifier><identifier>CODEN: HREDAN</identifier><language>eng</language><subject>College students ; Colleges and universities ; Educational policy ; Finance ; Great Britain ; Management</subject><ispartof>Higher education, 2010-11, Vol.60 (5), p.543-557</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27865,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Filippakou, Ourania</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Salter, Brian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tapper, Ted</creatorcontrib><title>Compliance, resistance and seduction: reflections on 20NByears of the funding council model of governance</title><title>Higher education</title><description>Formally the new public management model of governance was introduced into British higher education with the passage of the 1988 Education Reform Act, which abolished the existing University Grants Committee (UGC) and instigated the funding councils. This article explores the relationship between the state, the funding councils and the universities with respect to the contemporary development of the English system of higher education. The analysis is based on an exploration of four key policy issues: the quality assurance regime, the research assessment exercises, the widening participation agenda and the introduction of student fees. The goal is to explore how the quasi-state organisations-in particular the Higher Education Funding Council for England (HEFCE)-have mediated the relationship between the state and the universities. The evidence suggests that the coupling of the state to the universities follows one of three tracks: compliance, resistance and seduction. The article explores what factors determine why one relationship (or combination of relationships) prevails, and explains patterns of change over time. The overall conclusion is that institutional interaction is very complex, and it is inaccurate-as is sometimes claimed-to view the funding council as little more than a compliant channel of government policy. Adapted from the source document.</description><subject>College students</subject><subject>Colleges and universities</subject><subject>Educational policy</subject><subject>Finance</subject><subject>Great Britain</subject><subject>Management</subject><issn>0018-1560</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2010</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7TQ</sourceid><recordid>eNqNjLtOAzEQRV2AlPD4ALrpaDDMZLMPUhKBqKjoI8s7mxh5x2FnHcHfk0X5gFT3XJ2ra8wd4SMh1k9KWBdLi4T2uaCl_bkwc0RqLJUVzsyV6hciLqgs5iasU7-PwYnnBxhYg44Tg5MWlNvsx5BkdTRd5H9WSAIL_Hj5ZTccSwfjjqHL0gbZgk9ZfIjQp5bjJLfpwINMlzfmsnNR-faU1-b-7fVz_W73Q_rOrOOmD-o5Riecsm7qsiGqyqopzl_-AalXUIo</recordid><startdate>20101101</startdate><enddate>20101101</enddate><creator>Filippakou, Ourania</creator><creator>Salter, Brian</creator><creator>Tapper, Ted</creator><scope>7TQ</scope><scope>DHY</scope><scope>DON</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20101101</creationdate><title>Compliance, resistance and seduction: reflections on 20NByears of the funding council model of governance</title><author>Filippakou, Ourania ; Salter, Brian ; Tapper, Ted</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-proquest_miscellaneous_7581165683</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2010</creationdate><topic>College students</topic><topic>Colleges and universities</topic><topic>Educational policy</topic><topic>Finance</topic><topic>Great Britain</topic><topic>Management</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Filippakou, Ourania</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Salter, Brian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tapper, Ted</creatorcontrib><collection>PAIS Index</collection><collection>PAIS International</collection><collection>PAIS International (Ovid)</collection><jtitle>Higher education</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Filippakou, Ourania</au><au>Salter, Brian</au><au>Tapper, Ted</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Compliance, resistance and seduction: reflections on 20NByears of the funding council model of governance</atitle><jtitle>Higher education</jtitle><date>2010-11-01</date><risdate>2010</risdate><volume>60</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>543</spage><epage>557</epage><pages>543-557</pages><issn>0018-1560</issn><coden>HREDAN</coden><abstract>Formally the new public management model of governance was introduced into British higher education with the passage of the 1988 Education Reform Act, which abolished the existing University Grants Committee (UGC) and instigated the funding councils. This article explores the relationship between the state, the funding councils and the universities with respect to the contemporary development of the English system of higher education. The analysis is based on an exploration of four key policy issues: the quality assurance regime, the research assessment exercises, the widening participation agenda and the introduction of student fees. The goal is to explore how the quasi-state organisations-in particular the Higher Education Funding Council for England (HEFCE)-have mediated the relationship between the state and the universities. The evidence suggests that the coupling of the state to the universities follows one of three tracks: compliance, resistance and seduction. The article explores what factors determine why one relationship (or combination of relationships) prevails, and explains patterns of change over time. The overall conclusion is that institutional interaction is very complex, and it is inaccurate-as is sometimes claimed-to view the funding council as little more than a compliant channel of government policy. Adapted from the source document.</abstract><doi>10.1007/s10734-010-9314-x</doi></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0018-1560
ispartof Higher education, 2010-11, Vol.60 (5), p.543-557
issn 0018-1560
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_758116568
source PAIS Index; JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing; EBSCOhost Education Source; SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings
subjects College students
Colleges and universities
Educational policy
Finance
Great Britain
Management
title Compliance, resistance and seduction: reflections on 20NByears of the funding council model of governance
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-29T19%3A08%3A09IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Compliance,%20resistance%20and%20seduction:%20reflections%20on%2020NByears%20of%20the%20funding%20council%20model%20of%20governance&rft.jtitle=Higher%20education&rft.au=Filippakou,%20Ourania&rft.date=2010-11-01&rft.volume=60&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=543&rft.epage=557&rft.pages=543-557&rft.issn=0018-1560&rft.coden=HREDAN&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s10734-010-9314-x&rft_dat=%3Cproquest%3E758116568%3C/proquest%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=758116568&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true