Readmission: A useful indicator of the quality of inpatient psychiatric care
Abstract Background The literature is unclear regarding the relationship between hospital outcome (i.e., symptom improvement during a hospital admission) and readmission, questioning the validity of readmission as an indicator of the quality of the previous hospitalization. Thus, the present aim was...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of affective disorders 2010-10, Vol.126 (1), p.206-213 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 213 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 206 |
container_title | Journal of affective disorders |
container_volume | 126 |
creator | Byrne, Shannon L Hooke, Geoffrey R Page, Andrew C |
description | Abstract Background The literature is unclear regarding the relationship between hospital outcome (i.e., symptom improvement during a hospital admission) and readmission, questioning the validity of readmission as an indicator of the quality of the previous hospitalization. Thus, the present aim was to examine if hospital outcome is a predictor of readmission and identify the factors that may mask any effects. Methods A naturalistic historical study compared the predictors of readmission over the 30 days, 6 months and 5 years following discharge for first-ever admitted inpatients with depression ( n = 478) to all inpatients regardless of prior hospitalisations and current diagnoses ( n = 1177). Results Hospital outcome, as indicated by changes from admission to discharge in scores on symptom measures, during both first-ever admissions and admissions which are not the first, predicted readmissions over all time periods for all patients, not only those with depression. However, this finding was only significant when hospital outcome was assessed by improvements on a patient-reported symptom measure, and not a clinician-rated measure. Limitations The sample included inpatients treated at a private psychiatric hospital and therefore it is unknown if these findings can be generalised to patients treated in a public system. Conclusions These findings support that readmission may be a useful indicator of the quality of the previous hospitalization. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.jad.2010.02.135 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_758109349</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>1_s2_0_S0165032710002739</els_id><sourcerecordid>758109349</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c469t-f7f0862268a2bf63674633eae5bb7529864645d7e0681ea60ea54585938402423</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkktr3DAQgEVpaTZJf0AvxZeSk7ejt51CIYQ8CguBpD0LrTwmcr32RpIL--8js9sUcig9DQPfDDPfDCEfKSwpUPWlW3a2WTLIObAl5fINWVCpeckk1W_JIjOyBM70ETmOsQMAVWt4T44YcC5qphdkdY-22fgY_TicFxfFFLGd-sIPjXc2jaEY2yI9YvE02d6n3Zz6YWuTxyEV27hzj96m4F3hbMBT8q61fcQPh3hCfl5f_bi8LVd3N98vL1alE6pOZatbqBRjqrJs3SqutFCco0W5XmvJ6koJJWSjEVRF0SpAK4WsZM0rAUwwfkLO9n23YXyaMCaTN3DY93bAcYpGy4pCnTf8D1IApRSqTNI96cIYY8DWbIPf2LAzFMxs23Qm2zazbQPMZNu55tOh-7TeYPNS8UdvBj4fABud7dtgB-fjX44zwVktMvd1z2G29ttjMNFlww4bH9Al04z-n2N8e1Xtej_k-_W_cIexG6cw5HMYaiIzYB7mt5i_guaHyEPW_BkI6a7o</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>754011108</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Readmission: A useful indicator of the quality of inpatient psychiatric care</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><source>ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present)</source><creator>Byrne, Shannon L ; Hooke, Geoffrey R ; Page, Andrew C</creator><creatorcontrib>Byrne, Shannon L ; Hooke, Geoffrey R ; Page, Andrew C</creatorcontrib><description>Abstract Background The literature is unclear regarding the relationship between hospital outcome (i.e., symptom improvement during a hospital admission) and readmission, questioning the validity of readmission as an indicator of the quality of the previous hospitalization. Thus, the present aim was to examine if hospital outcome is a predictor of readmission and identify the factors that may mask any effects. Methods A naturalistic historical study compared the predictors of readmission over the 30 days, 6 months and 5 years following discharge for first-ever admitted inpatients with depression ( n = 478) to all inpatients regardless of prior hospitalisations and current diagnoses ( n = 1177). Results Hospital outcome, as indicated by changes from admission to discharge in scores on symptom measures, during both first-ever admissions and admissions which are not the first, predicted readmissions over all time periods for all patients, not only those with depression. However, this finding was only significant when hospital outcome was assessed by improvements on a patient-reported symptom measure, and not a clinician-rated measure. Limitations The sample included inpatients treated at a private psychiatric hospital and therefore it is unknown if these findings can be generalised to patients treated in a public system. Conclusions These findings support that readmission may be a useful indicator of the quality of the previous hospitalization.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0165-0327</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1573-2517</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.jad.2010.02.135</identifier><identifier>PMID: 20334927</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JADID7</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford: Elsevier B.V</publisher><subject>Adult ; Affective disorders ; Biological and medical sciences ; Depression ; Depressive Disorder - therapy ; Female ; Hospitalization ; Hospitals ; Humans ; Institution therapy. Inpatient treatment ; Length of Stay - statistics & numerical data ; Male ; Medical sciences ; Mental Disorders - therapy ; Mentally ill people ; Patient readmission ; Patient Readmission - statistics & numerical data ; Psychiatric hospitalization ; Psychiatric Status Rating Scales ; Psychiatry ; Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry ; Psychopathology. Psychiatry ; Quality indicator ; Quality Indicators, Health Care - standards ; Quality Indicators, Health Care - statistics & numerical data ; Quality of Health Care - standards ; Quality of Health Care - statistics & numerical data ; Readmission ; Regression Analysis ; Symptoms ; Time Factors ; Treatment Outcome ; Treatments</subject><ispartof>Journal of affective disorders, 2010-10, Vol.126 (1), p.206-213</ispartof><rights>Elsevier B.V.</rights><rights>2010 Elsevier B.V.</rights><rights>2015 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright 2010 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c469t-f7f0862268a2bf63674633eae5bb7529864645d7e0681ea60ea54585938402423</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jad.2010.02.135$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3536,27903,27904,30979,45974</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=23243294$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20334927$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Byrne, Shannon L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hooke, Geoffrey R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Page, Andrew C</creatorcontrib><title>Readmission: A useful indicator of the quality of inpatient psychiatric care</title><title>Journal of affective disorders</title><addtitle>J Affect Disord</addtitle><description>Abstract Background The literature is unclear regarding the relationship between hospital outcome (i.e., symptom improvement during a hospital admission) and readmission, questioning the validity of readmission as an indicator of the quality of the previous hospitalization. Thus, the present aim was to examine if hospital outcome is a predictor of readmission and identify the factors that may mask any effects. Methods A naturalistic historical study compared the predictors of readmission over the 30 days, 6 months and 5 years following discharge for first-ever admitted inpatients with depression ( n = 478) to all inpatients regardless of prior hospitalisations and current diagnoses ( n = 1177). Results Hospital outcome, as indicated by changes from admission to discharge in scores on symptom measures, during both first-ever admissions and admissions which are not the first, predicted readmissions over all time periods for all patients, not only those with depression. However, this finding was only significant when hospital outcome was assessed by improvements on a patient-reported symptom measure, and not a clinician-rated measure. Limitations The sample included inpatients treated at a private psychiatric hospital and therefore it is unknown if these findings can be generalised to patients treated in a public system. Conclusions These findings support that readmission may be a useful indicator of the quality of the previous hospitalization.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Affective disorders</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Depression</subject><subject>Depressive Disorder - therapy</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Hospitalization</subject><subject>Hospitals</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Institution therapy. Inpatient treatment</subject><subject>Length of Stay - statistics & numerical data</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Mental Disorders - therapy</subject><subject>Mentally ill people</subject><subject>Patient readmission</subject><subject>Patient Readmission - statistics & numerical data</subject><subject>Psychiatric hospitalization</subject><subject>Psychiatric Status Rating Scales</subject><subject>Psychiatry</subject><subject>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</subject><subject>Psychopathology. Psychiatry</subject><subject>Quality indicator</subject><subject>Quality Indicators, Health Care - standards</subject><subject>Quality Indicators, Health Care - statistics & numerical data</subject><subject>Quality of Health Care - standards</subject><subject>Quality of Health Care - statistics & numerical data</subject><subject>Readmission</subject><subject>Regression Analysis</subject><subject>Symptoms</subject><subject>Time Factors</subject><subject>Treatment Outcome</subject><subject>Treatments</subject><issn>0165-0327</issn><issn>1573-2517</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2010</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkktr3DAQgEVpaTZJf0AvxZeSk7ejt51CIYQ8CguBpD0LrTwmcr32RpIL--8js9sUcig9DQPfDDPfDCEfKSwpUPWlW3a2WTLIObAl5fINWVCpeckk1W_JIjOyBM70ETmOsQMAVWt4T44YcC5qphdkdY-22fgY_TicFxfFFLGd-sIPjXc2jaEY2yI9YvE02d6n3Zz6YWuTxyEV27hzj96m4F3hbMBT8q61fcQPh3hCfl5f_bi8LVd3N98vL1alE6pOZatbqBRjqrJs3SqutFCco0W5XmvJ6koJJWSjEVRF0SpAK4WsZM0rAUwwfkLO9n23YXyaMCaTN3DY93bAcYpGy4pCnTf8D1IApRSqTNI96cIYY8DWbIPf2LAzFMxs23Qm2zazbQPMZNu55tOh-7TeYPNS8UdvBj4fABud7dtgB-fjX44zwVktMvd1z2G29ttjMNFlww4bH9Al04z-n2N8e1Xtej_k-_W_cIexG6cw5HMYaiIzYB7mt5i_guaHyEPW_BkI6a7o</recordid><startdate>20101001</startdate><enddate>20101001</enddate><creator>Byrne, Shannon L</creator><creator>Hooke, Geoffrey R</creator><creator>Page, Andrew C</creator><general>Elsevier B.V</general><general>Elsevier</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>7QJ</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20101001</creationdate><title>Readmission: A useful indicator of the quality of inpatient psychiatric care</title><author>Byrne, Shannon L ; Hooke, Geoffrey R ; Page, Andrew C</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c469t-f7f0862268a2bf63674633eae5bb7529864645d7e0681ea60ea54585938402423</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2010</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Affective disorders</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Depression</topic><topic>Depressive Disorder - therapy</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Hospitalization</topic><topic>Hospitals</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Institution therapy. Inpatient treatment</topic><topic>Length of Stay - statistics & numerical data</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Mental Disorders - therapy</topic><topic>Mentally ill people</topic><topic>Patient readmission</topic><topic>Patient Readmission - statistics & numerical data</topic><topic>Psychiatric hospitalization</topic><topic>Psychiatric Status Rating Scales</topic><topic>Psychiatry</topic><topic>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</topic><topic>Psychopathology. Psychiatry</topic><topic>Quality indicator</topic><topic>Quality Indicators, Health Care - standards</topic><topic>Quality Indicators, Health Care - statistics & numerical data</topic><topic>Quality of Health Care - standards</topic><topic>Quality of Health Care - statistics & numerical data</topic><topic>Readmission</topic><topic>Regression Analysis</topic><topic>Symptoms</topic><topic>Time Factors</topic><topic>Treatment Outcome</topic><topic>Treatments</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Byrne, Shannon L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hooke, Geoffrey R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Page, Andrew C</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><jtitle>Journal of affective disorders</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Byrne, Shannon L</au><au>Hooke, Geoffrey R</au><au>Page, Andrew C</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Readmission: A useful indicator of the quality of inpatient psychiatric care</atitle><jtitle>Journal of affective disorders</jtitle><addtitle>J Affect Disord</addtitle><date>2010-10-01</date><risdate>2010</risdate><volume>126</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>206</spage><epage>213</epage><pages>206-213</pages><issn>0165-0327</issn><eissn>1573-2517</eissn><coden>JADID7</coden><abstract>Abstract Background The literature is unclear regarding the relationship between hospital outcome (i.e., symptom improvement during a hospital admission) and readmission, questioning the validity of readmission as an indicator of the quality of the previous hospitalization. Thus, the present aim was to examine if hospital outcome is a predictor of readmission and identify the factors that may mask any effects. Methods A naturalistic historical study compared the predictors of readmission over the 30 days, 6 months and 5 years following discharge for first-ever admitted inpatients with depression ( n = 478) to all inpatients regardless of prior hospitalisations and current diagnoses ( n = 1177). Results Hospital outcome, as indicated by changes from admission to discharge in scores on symptom measures, during both first-ever admissions and admissions which are not the first, predicted readmissions over all time periods for all patients, not only those with depression. However, this finding was only significant when hospital outcome was assessed by improvements on a patient-reported symptom measure, and not a clinician-rated measure. Limitations The sample included inpatients treated at a private psychiatric hospital and therefore it is unknown if these findings can be generalised to patients treated in a public system. Conclusions These findings support that readmission may be a useful indicator of the quality of the previous hospitalization.</abstract><cop>Oxford</cop><pub>Elsevier B.V</pub><pmid>20334927</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.jad.2010.02.135</doi><tpages>8</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0165-0327 |
ispartof | Journal of affective disorders, 2010-10, Vol.126 (1), p.206-213 |
issn | 0165-0327 1573-2517 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_758109349 |
source | MEDLINE; Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA); ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present) |
subjects | Adult Affective disorders Biological and medical sciences Depression Depressive Disorder - therapy Female Hospitalization Hospitals Humans Institution therapy. Inpatient treatment Length of Stay - statistics & numerical data Male Medical sciences Mental Disorders - therapy Mentally ill people Patient readmission Patient Readmission - statistics & numerical data Psychiatric hospitalization Psychiatric Status Rating Scales Psychiatry Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry Psychopathology. Psychiatry Quality indicator Quality Indicators, Health Care - standards Quality Indicators, Health Care - statistics & numerical data Quality of Health Care - standards Quality of Health Care - statistics & numerical data Readmission Regression Analysis Symptoms Time Factors Treatment Outcome Treatments |
title | Readmission: A useful indicator of the quality of inpatient psychiatric care |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-21T17%3A40%3A20IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Readmission:%20A%20useful%20indicator%20of%20the%20quality%20of%20inpatient%20psychiatric%20care&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20affective%20disorders&rft.au=Byrne,%20Shannon%20L&rft.date=2010-10-01&rft.volume=126&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=206&rft.epage=213&rft.pages=206-213&rft.issn=0165-0327&rft.eissn=1573-2517&rft.coden=JADID7&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.jad.2010.02.135&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E758109349%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=754011108&rft_id=info:pmid/20334927&rft_els_id=1_s2_0_S0165032710002739&rfr_iscdi=true |