Readmission: A useful indicator of the quality of inpatient psychiatric care

Abstract Background The literature is unclear regarding the relationship between hospital outcome (i.e., symptom improvement during a hospital admission) and readmission, questioning the validity of readmission as an indicator of the quality of the previous hospitalization. Thus, the present aim was...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of affective disorders 2010-10, Vol.126 (1), p.206-213
Hauptverfasser: Byrne, Shannon L, Hooke, Geoffrey R, Page, Andrew C
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 213
container_issue 1
container_start_page 206
container_title Journal of affective disorders
container_volume 126
creator Byrne, Shannon L
Hooke, Geoffrey R
Page, Andrew C
description Abstract Background The literature is unclear regarding the relationship between hospital outcome (i.e., symptom improvement during a hospital admission) and readmission, questioning the validity of readmission as an indicator of the quality of the previous hospitalization. Thus, the present aim was to examine if hospital outcome is a predictor of readmission and identify the factors that may mask any effects. Methods A naturalistic historical study compared the predictors of readmission over the 30 days, 6 months and 5 years following discharge for first-ever admitted inpatients with depression ( n = 478) to all inpatients regardless of prior hospitalisations and current diagnoses ( n = 1177). Results Hospital outcome, as indicated by changes from admission to discharge in scores on symptom measures, during both first-ever admissions and admissions which are not the first, predicted readmissions over all time periods for all patients, not only those with depression. However, this finding was only significant when hospital outcome was assessed by improvements on a patient-reported symptom measure, and not a clinician-rated measure. Limitations The sample included inpatients treated at a private psychiatric hospital and therefore it is unknown if these findings can be generalised to patients treated in a public system. Conclusions These findings support that readmission may be a useful indicator of the quality of the previous hospitalization.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.jad.2010.02.135
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_758109349</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>1_s2_0_S0165032710002739</els_id><sourcerecordid>758109349</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c469t-f7f0862268a2bf63674633eae5bb7529864645d7e0681ea60ea54585938402423</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkktr3DAQgEVpaTZJf0AvxZeSk7ejt51CIYQ8CguBpD0LrTwmcr32RpIL--8js9sUcig9DQPfDDPfDCEfKSwpUPWlW3a2WTLIObAl5fINWVCpeckk1W_JIjOyBM70ETmOsQMAVWt4T44YcC5qphdkdY-22fgY_TicFxfFFLGd-sIPjXc2jaEY2yI9YvE02d6n3Zz6YWuTxyEV27hzj96m4F3hbMBT8q61fcQPh3hCfl5f_bi8LVd3N98vL1alE6pOZatbqBRjqrJs3SqutFCco0W5XmvJ6koJJWSjEVRF0SpAK4WsZM0rAUwwfkLO9n23YXyaMCaTN3DY93bAcYpGy4pCnTf8D1IApRSqTNI96cIYY8DWbIPf2LAzFMxs23Qm2zazbQPMZNu55tOh-7TeYPNS8UdvBj4fABud7dtgB-fjX44zwVktMvd1z2G29ttjMNFlww4bH9Al04z-n2N8e1Xtej_k-_W_cIexG6cw5HMYaiIzYB7mt5i_guaHyEPW_BkI6a7o</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>754011108</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Readmission: A useful indicator of the quality of inpatient psychiatric care</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Applied Social Sciences Index &amp; Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><source>ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present)</source><creator>Byrne, Shannon L ; Hooke, Geoffrey R ; Page, Andrew C</creator><creatorcontrib>Byrne, Shannon L ; Hooke, Geoffrey R ; Page, Andrew C</creatorcontrib><description>Abstract Background The literature is unclear regarding the relationship between hospital outcome (i.e., symptom improvement during a hospital admission) and readmission, questioning the validity of readmission as an indicator of the quality of the previous hospitalization. Thus, the present aim was to examine if hospital outcome is a predictor of readmission and identify the factors that may mask any effects. Methods A naturalistic historical study compared the predictors of readmission over the 30 days, 6 months and 5 years following discharge for first-ever admitted inpatients with depression ( n = 478) to all inpatients regardless of prior hospitalisations and current diagnoses ( n = 1177). Results Hospital outcome, as indicated by changes from admission to discharge in scores on symptom measures, during both first-ever admissions and admissions which are not the first, predicted readmissions over all time periods for all patients, not only those with depression. However, this finding was only significant when hospital outcome was assessed by improvements on a patient-reported symptom measure, and not a clinician-rated measure. Limitations The sample included inpatients treated at a private psychiatric hospital and therefore it is unknown if these findings can be generalised to patients treated in a public system. Conclusions These findings support that readmission may be a useful indicator of the quality of the previous hospitalization.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0165-0327</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1573-2517</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.jad.2010.02.135</identifier><identifier>PMID: 20334927</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JADID7</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford: Elsevier B.V</publisher><subject>Adult ; Affective disorders ; Biological and medical sciences ; Depression ; Depressive Disorder - therapy ; Female ; Hospitalization ; Hospitals ; Humans ; Institution therapy. Inpatient treatment ; Length of Stay - statistics &amp; numerical data ; Male ; Medical sciences ; Mental Disorders - therapy ; Mentally ill people ; Patient readmission ; Patient Readmission - statistics &amp; numerical data ; Psychiatric hospitalization ; Psychiatric Status Rating Scales ; Psychiatry ; Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry ; Psychopathology. Psychiatry ; Quality indicator ; Quality Indicators, Health Care - standards ; Quality Indicators, Health Care - statistics &amp; numerical data ; Quality of Health Care - standards ; Quality of Health Care - statistics &amp; numerical data ; Readmission ; Regression Analysis ; Symptoms ; Time Factors ; Treatment Outcome ; Treatments</subject><ispartof>Journal of affective disorders, 2010-10, Vol.126 (1), p.206-213</ispartof><rights>Elsevier B.V.</rights><rights>2010 Elsevier B.V.</rights><rights>2015 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright 2010 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c469t-f7f0862268a2bf63674633eae5bb7529864645d7e0681ea60ea54585938402423</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jad.2010.02.135$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3536,27903,27904,30979,45974</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=23243294$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20334927$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Byrne, Shannon L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hooke, Geoffrey R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Page, Andrew C</creatorcontrib><title>Readmission: A useful indicator of the quality of inpatient psychiatric care</title><title>Journal of affective disorders</title><addtitle>J Affect Disord</addtitle><description>Abstract Background The literature is unclear regarding the relationship between hospital outcome (i.e., symptom improvement during a hospital admission) and readmission, questioning the validity of readmission as an indicator of the quality of the previous hospitalization. Thus, the present aim was to examine if hospital outcome is a predictor of readmission and identify the factors that may mask any effects. Methods A naturalistic historical study compared the predictors of readmission over the 30 days, 6 months and 5 years following discharge for first-ever admitted inpatients with depression ( n = 478) to all inpatients regardless of prior hospitalisations and current diagnoses ( n = 1177). Results Hospital outcome, as indicated by changes from admission to discharge in scores on symptom measures, during both first-ever admissions and admissions which are not the first, predicted readmissions over all time periods for all patients, not only those with depression. However, this finding was only significant when hospital outcome was assessed by improvements on a patient-reported symptom measure, and not a clinician-rated measure. Limitations The sample included inpatients treated at a private psychiatric hospital and therefore it is unknown if these findings can be generalised to patients treated in a public system. Conclusions These findings support that readmission may be a useful indicator of the quality of the previous hospitalization.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Affective disorders</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Depression</subject><subject>Depressive Disorder - therapy</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Hospitalization</subject><subject>Hospitals</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Institution therapy. Inpatient treatment</subject><subject>Length of Stay - statistics &amp; numerical data</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Mental Disorders - therapy</subject><subject>Mentally ill people</subject><subject>Patient readmission</subject><subject>Patient Readmission - statistics &amp; numerical data</subject><subject>Psychiatric hospitalization</subject><subject>Psychiatric Status Rating Scales</subject><subject>Psychiatry</subject><subject>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</subject><subject>Psychopathology. Psychiatry</subject><subject>Quality indicator</subject><subject>Quality Indicators, Health Care - standards</subject><subject>Quality Indicators, Health Care - statistics &amp; numerical data</subject><subject>Quality of Health Care - standards</subject><subject>Quality of Health Care - statistics &amp; numerical data</subject><subject>Readmission</subject><subject>Regression Analysis</subject><subject>Symptoms</subject><subject>Time Factors</subject><subject>Treatment Outcome</subject><subject>Treatments</subject><issn>0165-0327</issn><issn>1573-2517</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2010</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkktr3DAQgEVpaTZJf0AvxZeSk7ejt51CIYQ8CguBpD0LrTwmcr32RpIL--8js9sUcig9DQPfDDPfDCEfKSwpUPWlW3a2WTLIObAl5fINWVCpeckk1W_JIjOyBM70ETmOsQMAVWt4T44YcC5qphdkdY-22fgY_TicFxfFFLGd-sIPjXc2jaEY2yI9YvE02d6n3Zz6YWuTxyEV27hzj96m4F3hbMBT8q61fcQPh3hCfl5f_bi8LVd3N98vL1alE6pOZatbqBRjqrJs3SqutFCco0W5XmvJ6koJJWSjEVRF0SpAK4WsZM0rAUwwfkLO9n23YXyaMCaTN3DY93bAcYpGy4pCnTf8D1IApRSqTNI96cIYY8DWbIPf2LAzFMxs23Qm2zazbQPMZNu55tOh-7TeYPNS8UdvBj4fABud7dtgB-fjX44zwVktMvd1z2G29ttjMNFlww4bH9Al04z-n2N8e1Xtej_k-_W_cIexG6cw5HMYaiIzYB7mt5i_guaHyEPW_BkI6a7o</recordid><startdate>20101001</startdate><enddate>20101001</enddate><creator>Byrne, Shannon L</creator><creator>Hooke, Geoffrey R</creator><creator>Page, Andrew C</creator><general>Elsevier B.V</general><general>Elsevier</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>7QJ</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20101001</creationdate><title>Readmission: A useful indicator of the quality of inpatient psychiatric care</title><author>Byrne, Shannon L ; Hooke, Geoffrey R ; Page, Andrew C</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c469t-f7f0862268a2bf63674633eae5bb7529864645d7e0681ea60ea54585938402423</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2010</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Affective disorders</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Depression</topic><topic>Depressive Disorder - therapy</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Hospitalization</topic><topic>Hospitals</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Institution therapy. Inpatient treatment</topic><topic>Length of Stay - statistics &amp; numerical data</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Mental Disorders - therapy</topic><topic>Mentally ill people</topic><topic>Patient readmission</topic><topic>Patient Readmission - statistics &amp; numerical data</topic><topic>Psychiatric hospitalization</topic><topic>Psychiatric Status Rating Scales</topic><topic>Psychiatry</topic><topic>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</topic><topic>Psychopathology. Psychiatry</topic><topic>Quality indicator</topic><topic>Quality Indicators, Health Care - standards</topic><topic>Quality Indicators, Health Care - statistics &amp; numerical data</topic><topic>Quality of Health Care - standards</topic><topic>Quality of Health Care - statistics &amp; numerical data</topic><topic>Readmission</topic><topic>Regression Analysis</topic><topic>Symptoms</topic><topic>Time Factors</topic><topic>Treatment Outcome</topic><topic>Treatments</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Byrne, Shannon L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hooke, Geoffrey R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Page, Andrew C</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index &amp; Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><jtitle>Journal of affective disorders</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Byrne, Shannon L</au><au>Hooke, Geoffrey R</au><au>Page, Andrew C</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Readmission: A useful indicator of the quality of inpatient psychiatric care</atitle><jtitle>Journal of affective disorders</jtitle><addtitle>J Affect Disord</addtitle><date>2010-10-01</date><risdate>2010</risdate><volume>126</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>206</spage><epage>213</epage><pages>206-213</pages><issn>0165-0327</issn><eissn>1573-2517</eissn><coden>JADID7</coden><abstract>Abstract Background The literature is unclear regarding the relationship between hospital outcome (i.e., symptom improvement during a hospital admission) and readmission, questioning the validity of readmission as an indicator of the quality of the previous hospitalization. Thus, the present aim was to examine if hospital outcome is a predictor of readmission and identify the factors that may mask any effects. Methods A naturalistic historical study compared the predictors of readmission over the 30 days, 6 months and 5 years following discharge for first-ever admitted inpatients with depression ( n = 478) to all inpatients regardless of prior hospitalisations and current diagnoses ( n = 1177). Results Hospital outcome, as indicated by changes from admission to discharge in scores on symptom measures, during both first-ever admissions and admissions which are not the first, predicted readmissions over all time periods for all patients, not only those with depression. However, this finding was only significant when hospital outcome was assessed by improvements on a patient-reported symptom measure, and not a clinician-rated measure. Limitations The sample included inpatients treated at a private psychiatric hospital and therefore it is unknown if these findings can be generalised to patients treated in a public system. Conclusions These findings support that readmission may be a useful indicator of the quality of the previous hospitalization.</abstract><cop>Oxford</cop><pub>Elsevier B.V</pub><pmid>20334927</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.jad.2010.02.135</doi><tpages>8</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0165-0327
ispartof Journal of affective disorders, 2010-10, Vol.126 (1), p.206-213
issn 0165-0327
1573-2517
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_758109349
source MEDLINE; Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA); ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present)
subjects Adult
Affective disorders
Biological and medical sciences
Depression
Depressive Disorder - therapy
Female
Hospitalization
Hospitals
Humans
Institution therapy. Inpatient treatment
Length of Stay - statistics & numerical data
Male
Medical sciences
Mental Disorders - therapy
Mentally ill people
Patient readmission
Patient Readmission - statistics & numerical data
Psychiatric hospitalization
Psychiatric Status Rating Scales
Psychiatry
Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry
Psychopathology. Psychiatry
Quality indicator
Quality Indicators, Health Care - standards
Quality Indicators, Health Care - statistics & numerical data
Quality of Health Care - standards
Quality of Health Care - statistics & numerical data
Readmission
Regression Analysis
Symptoms
Time Factors
Treatment Outcome
Treatments
title Readmission: A useful indicator of the quality of inpatient psychiatric care
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-21T17%3A40%3A20IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Readmission:%20A%20useful%20indicator%20of%20the%20quality%20of%20inpatient%20psychiatric%20care&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20affective%20disorders&rft.au=Byrne,%20Shannon%20L&rft.date=2010-10-01&rft.volume=126&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=206&rft.epage=213&rft.pages=206-213&rft.issn=0165-0327&rft.eissn=1573-2517&rft.coden=JADID7&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.jad.2010.02.135&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E758109349%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=754011108&rft_id=info:pmid/20334927&rft_els_id=1_s2_0_S0165032710002739&rfr_iscdi=true