Mammography and Physician Breast Exams after the Diagnosis of Breast Cancer in a Twin or Non-Twin Sister
Reports of breast-cancer-screening behavior were collected from 591 twin sisters of women with breast cancer and 182 non-twin sisters of the same women, and compared with the patterns found by national surveys. Timeline plots indicate that prior to the diagnosis of breast cancer in a sister, these w...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Cancer causes & control 1993-05, Vol.4 (3), p.251-260 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 260 |
---|---|
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 251 |
container_title | Cancer causes & control |
container_volume | 4 |
creator | Richardson, Jean L. Danley, Kathleen Mondrus, Gencie T. Deapen, Dennis Mack, Thomas |
description | Reports of breast-cancer-screening behavior were collected from 591 twin sisters of women with breast cancer and 182 non-twin sisters of the same women, and compared with the patterns found by national surveys. Timeline plots indicate that prior to the diagnosis of breast cancer in a sister, these women were being screened at prevailing rates. In the year after diagnosis, the annual frequency of use by them of both mammograms and physician breast exams increased by approximately 25 percent, but in subsequent years these rates dropped to a plateau no more than 10 to 15 percent higher than the baseline. The sisters over age 60 were screened with unusually low frequency, as were those with no partner in the home, those with no regular source of medical care, and especially the siblings of cases that died soon after the diagnosis. The relatively infrequent adoption of a long-term, annual, screening pattern in the face of certain knowledge of personal high risk gives cause for concern about the effectiveness of any intervention program requiring recognition of personal high risk for effectiveness. One cause for optimism is that higher screening rates prevail among those with co-twins diagnosed since 1980, suggesting that the increase in publicity and public education in recent decades has had a beneficial impact. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/BF00051320 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_75806168</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>3552850</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>3552850</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c218t-6f78c0520358b0b3dfcb7ce33d77e8345ece50fd844ce3ec7b5ca8bc007c219b3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpFkM9PwjAUxxujQUQvnjXpyYPJ9HVd13IUBDXBH4l4XrquYyVsxXZE-e8tgnh6L-_zed_DF6FzAjcEgN8OxgDACI3hAHUJ4zTiccwOURf6jEcsTugxOvF-vrHSGDqoIygRaUK6qHqWdW1nTi6rNZZNgd-qtTfKyAYPnJa-xaNvWXssy1Y73FYa3xs5a6w3HtvyzxnKRgVsGizx9CsM6_CLbaLf_d348HuKjkq58PpsN3voYzyaDh-jyevD0_BuEqmYiDZKSy4UsBgoEznktChVzpWmtOBcC5owrTSDshBJEq5a8ZwpKXIVaggB_Zz20NU2d-ns50r7NquNV3qxkI22K59xJiAlqQji9VZUznrvdJktnamlW2cEsk2t2X-tQb7cpa7yWhd7dddj4BdbPvetdXtMGYsFA_oD44p7Rg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>75806168</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Mammography and Physician Breast Exams after the Diagnosis of Breast Cancer in a Twin or Non-Twin Sister</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing</source><source>SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings</source><creator>Richardson, Jean L. ; Danley, Kathleen ; Mondrus, Gencie T. ; Deapen, Dennis ; Mack, Thomas</creator><creatorcontrib>Richardson, Jean L. ; Danley, Kathleen ; Mondrus, Gencie T. ; Deapen, Dennis ; Mack, Thomas</creatorcontrib><description>Reports of breast-cancer-screening behavior were collected from 591 twin sisters of women with breast cancer and 182 non-twin sisters of the same women, and compared with the patterns found by national surveys. Timeline plots indicate that prior to the diagnosis of breast cancer in a sister, these women were being screened at prevailing rates. In the year after diagnosis, the annual frequency of use by them of both mammograms and physician breast exams increased by approximately 25 percent, but in subsequent years these rates dropped to a plateau no more than 10 to 15 percent higher than the baseline. The sisters over age 60 were screened with unusually low frequency, as were those with no partner in the home, those with no regular source of medical care, and especially the siblings of cases that died soon after the diagnosis. The relatively infrequent adoption of a long-term, annual, screening pattern in the face of certain knowledge of personal high risk gives cause for concern about the effectiveness of any intervention program requiring recognition of personal high risk for effectiveness. One cause for optimism is that higher screening rates prevail among those with co-twins diagnosed since 1980, suggesting that the increase in publicity and public education in recent decades has had a beneficial impact.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0957-5243</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1573-7225</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/BF00051320</identifier><identifier>PMID: 8318641</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Netherlands: Rapid Communications of Oxford Ltd</publisher><subject>Adult ; Age Factors ; Aged ; Breast cancer ; Breast Neoplasms - diagnosis ; Breast Neoplasms - mortality ; Breast Neoplasms - prevention & control ; Cancer screening ; Diseases in Twins - diagnosis ; Diseases in Twins - epidemiology ; Diseases in Twins - prevention & control ; Family - psychology ; Family history ; Female ; Health Behavior ; Health status ; Health Surveys ; Humans ; Mammography ; Mammography - psychology ; Mammography - utilization ; Mass Screening - psychology ; Mass Screening - utilization ; Middle Aged ; National health insurance ; Patient assessment ; Physical Examination - psychology ; Physical Examination - utilization ; Physicians ; Research Papers ; Sisters ; Survival Rate ; Twins ; Twins - psychology ; United States - epidemiology</subject><ispartof>Cancer causes & control, 1993-05, Vol.4 (3), p.251-260</ispartof><rights>Copyright 1993 Rapid Communications of Oxford Ltd.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c218t-6f78c0520358b0b3dfcb7ce33d77e8345ece50fd844ce3ec7b5ca8bc007c219b3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c218t-6f78c0520358b0b3dfcb7ce33d77e8345ece50fd844ce3ec7b5ca8bc007c219b3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/3552850$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/3552850$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,803,27923,27924,58016,58249</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8318641$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Richardson, Jean L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Danley, Kathleen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mondrus, Gencie T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Deapen, Dennis</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mack, Thomas</creatorcontrib><title>Mammography and Physician Breast Exams after the Diagnosis of Breast Cancer in a Twin or Non-Twin Sister</title><title>Cancer causes & control</title><addtitle>Cancer Causes Control</addtitle><description>Reports of breast-cancer-screening behavior were collected from 591 twin sisters of women with breast cancer and 182 non-twin sisters of the same women, and compared with the patterns found by national surveys. Timeline plots indicate that prior to the diagnosis of breast cancer in a sister, these women were being screened at prevailing rates. In the year after diagnosis, the annual frequency of use by them of both mammograms and physician breast exams increased by approximately 25 percent, but in subsequent years these rates dropped to a plateau no more than 10 to 15 percent higher than the baseline. The sisters over age 60 were screened with unusually low frequency, as were those with no partner in the home, those with no regular source of medical care, and especially the siblings of cases that died soon after the diagnosis. The relatively infrequent adoption of a long-term, annual, screening pattern in the face of certain knowledge of personal high risk gives cause for concern about the effectiveness of any intervention program requiring recognition of personal high risk for effectiveness. One cause for optimism is that higher screening rates prevail among those with co-twins diagnosed since 1980, suggesting that the increase in publicity and public education in recent decades has had a beneficial impact.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Age Factors</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Breast cancer</subject><subject>Breast Neoplasms - diagnosis</subject><subject>Breast Neoplasms - mortality</subject><subject>Breast Neoplasms - prevention & control</subject><subject>Cancer screening</subject><subject>Diseases in Twins - diagnosis</subject><subject>Diseases in Twins - epidemiology</subject><subject>Diseases in Twins - prevention & control</subject><subject>Family - psychology</subject><subject>Family history</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Health Behavior</subject><subject>Health status</subject><subject>Health Surveys</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Mammography</subject><subject>Mammography - psychology</subject><subject>Mammography - utilization</subject><subject>Mass Screening - psychology</subject><subject>Mass Screening - utilization</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>National health insurance</subject><subject>Patient assessment</subject><subject>Physical Examination - psychology</subject><subject>Physical Examination - utilization</subject><subject>Physicians</subject><subject>Research Papers</subject><subject>Sisters</subject><subject>Survival Rate</subject><subject>Twins</subject><subject>Twins - psychology</subject><subject>United States - epidemiology</subject><issn>0957-5243</issn><issn>1573-7225</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1993</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNpFkM9PwjAUxxujQUQvnjXpyYPJ9HVd13IUBDXBH4l4XrquYyVsxXZE-e8tgnh6L-_zed_DF6FzAjcEgN8OxgDACI3hAHUJ4zTiccwOURf6jEcsTugxOvF-vrHSGDqoIygRaUK6qHqWdW1nTi6rNZZNgd-qtTfKyAYPnJa-xaNvWXssy1Y73FYa3xs5a6w3HtvyzxnKRgVsGizx9CsM6_CLbaLf_d348HuKjkq58PpsN3voYzyaDh-jyevD0_BuEqmYiDZKSy4UsBgoEznktChVzpWmtOBcC5owrTSDshBJEq5a8ZwpKXIVaggB_Zz20NU2d-ns50r7NquNV3qxkI22K59xJiAlqQji9VZUznrvdJktnamlW2cEsk2t2X-tQb7cpa7yWhd7dddj4BdbPvetdXtMGYsFA_oD44p7Rg</recordid><startdate>19930501</startdate><enddate>19930501</enddate><creator>Richardson, Jean L.</creator><creator>Danley, Kathleen</creator><creator>Mondrus, Gencie T.</creator><creator>Deapen, Dennis</creator><creator>Mack, Thomas</creator><general>Rapid Communications of Oxford Ltd</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19930501</creationdate><title>Mammography and Physician Breast Exams after the Diagnosis of Breast Cancer in a Twin or Non-Twin Sister</title><author>Richardson, Jean L. ; Danley, Kathleen ; Mondrus, Gencie T. ; Deapen, Dennis ; Mack, Thomas</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c218t-6f78c0520358b0b3dfcb7ce33d77e8345ece50fd844ce3ec7b5ca8bc007c219b3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1993</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Age Factors</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Breast cancer</topic><topic>Breast Neoplasms - diagnosis</topic><topic>Breast Neoplasms - mortality</topic><topic>Breast Neoplasms - prevention & control</topic><topic>Cancer screening</topic><topic>Diseases in Twins - diagnosis</topic><topic>Diseases in Twins - epidemiology</topic><topic>Diseases in Twins - prevention & control</topic><topic>Family - psychology</topic><topic>Family history</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Health Behavior</topic><topic>Health status</topic><topic>Health Surveys</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Mammography</topic><topic>Mammography - psychology</topic><topic>Mammography - utilization</topic><topic>Mass Screening - psychology</topic><topic>Mass Screening - utilization</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>National health insurance</topic><topic>Patient assessment</topic><topic>Physical Examination - psychology</topic><topic>Physical Examination - utilization</topic><topic>Physicians</topic><topic>Research Papers</topic><topic>Sisters</topic><topic>Survival Rate</topic><topic>Twins</topic><topic>Twins - psychology</topic><topic>United States - epidemiology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Richardson, Jean L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Danley, Kathleen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mondrus, Gencie T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Deapen, Dennis</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mack, Thomas</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Cancer causes & control</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Richardson, Jean L.</au><au>Danley, Kathleen</au><au>Mondrus, Gencie T.</au><au>Deapen, Dennis</au><au>Mack, Thomas</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Mammography and Physician Breast Exams after the Diagnosis of Breast Cancer in a Twin or Non-Twin Sister</atitle><jtitle>Cancer causes & control</jtitle><addtitle>Cancer Causes Control</addtitle><date>1993-05-01</date><risdate>1993</risdate><volume>4</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>251</spage><epage>260</epage><pages>251-260</pages><issn>0957-5243</issn><eissn>1573-7225</eissn><abstract>Reports of breast-cancer-screening behavior were collected from 591 twin sisters of women with breast cancer and 182 non-twin sisters of the same women, and compared with the patterns found by national surveys. Timeline plots indicate that prior to the diagnosis of breast cancer in a sister, these women were being screened at prevailing rates. In the year after diagnosis, the annual frequency of use by them of both mammograms and physician breast exams increased by approximately 25 percent, but in subsequent years these rates dropped to a plateau no more than 10 to 15 percent higher than the baseline. The sisters over age 60 were screened with unusually low frequency, as were those with no partner in the home, those with no regular source of medical care, and especially the siblings of cases that died soon after the diagnosis. The relatively infrequent adoption of a long-term, annual, screening pattern in the face of certain knowledge of personal high risk gives cause for concern about the effectiveness of any intervention program requiring recognition of personal high risk for effectiveness. One cause for optimism is that higher screening rates prevail among those with co-twins diagnosed since 1980, suggesting that the increase in publicity and public education in recent decades has had a beneficial impact.</abstract><cop>Netherlands</cop><pub>Rapid Communications of Oxford Ltd</pub><pmid>8318641</pmid><doi>10.1007/BF00051320</doi><tpages>10</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0957-5243 |
ispartof | Cancer causes & control, 1993-05, Vol.4 (3), p.251-260 |
issn | 0957-5243 1573-7225 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_75806168 |
source | MEDLINE; JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing; SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings |
subjects | Adult Age Factors Aged Breast cancer Breast Neoplasms - diagnosis Breast Neoplasms - mortality Breast Neoplasms - prevention & control Cancer screening Diseases in Twins - diagnosis Diseases in Twins - epidemiology Diseases in Twins - prevention & control Family - psychology Family history Female Health Behavior Health status Health Surveys Humans Mammography Mammography - psychology Mammography - utilization Mass Screening - psychology Mass Screening - utilization Middle Aged National health insurance Patient assessment Physical Examination - psychology Physical Examination - utilization Physicians Research Papers Sisters Survival Rate Twins Twins - psychology United States - epidemiology |
title | Mammography and Physician Breast Exams after the Diagnosis of Breast Cancer in a Twin or Non-Twin Sister |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-08T09%3A40%3A29IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Mammography%20and%20Physician%20Breast%20Exams%20after%20the%20Diagnosis%20of%20Breast%20Cancer%20in%20a%20Twin%20or%20Non-Twin%20Sister&rft.jtitle=Cancer%20causes%20&%20control&rft.au=Richardson,%20Jean%20L.&rft.date=1993-05-01&rft.volume=4&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=251&rft.epage=260&rft.pages=251-260&rft.issn=0957-5243&rft.eissn=1573-7225&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/BF00051320&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E3552850%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=75806168&rft_id=info:pmid/8318641&rft_jstor_id=3552850&rfr_iscdi=true |