Mammography and Physician Breast Exams after the Diagnosis of Breast Cancer in a Twin or Non-Twin Sister

Reports of breast-cancer-screening behavior were collected from 591 twin sisters of women with breast cancer and 182 non-twin sisters of the same women, and compared with the patterns found by national surveys. Timeline plots indicate that prior to the diagnosis of breast cancer in a sister, these w...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Cancer causes & control 1993-05, Vol.4 (3), p.251-260
Hauptverfasser: Richardson, Jean L., Danley, Kathleen, Mondrus, Gencie T., Deapen, Dennis, Mack, Thomas
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 260
container_issue 3
container_start_page 251
container_title Cancer causes & control
container_volume 4
creator Richardson, Jean L.
Danley, Kathleen
Mondrus, Gencie T.
Deapen, Dennis
Mack, Thomas
description Reports of breast-cancer-screening behavior were collected from 591 twin sisters of women with breast cancer and 182 non-twin sisters of the same women, and compared with the patterns found by national surveys. Timeline plots indicate that prior to the diagnosis of breast cancer in a sister, these women were being screened at prevailing rates. In the year after diagnosis, the annual frequency of use by them of both mammograms and physician breast exams increased by approximately 25 percent, but in subsequent years these rates dropped to a plateau no more than 10 to 15 percent higher than the baseline. The sisters over age 60 were screened with unusually low frequency, as were those with no partner in the home, those with no regular source of medical care, and especially the siblings of cases that died soon after the diagnosis. The relatively infrequent adoption of a long-term, annual, screening pattern in the face of certain knowledge of personal high risk gives cause for concern about the effectiveness of any intervention program requiring recognition of personal high risk for effectiveness. One cause for optimism is that higher screening rates prevail among those with co-twins diagnosed since 1980, suggesting that the increase in publicity and public education in recent decades has had a beneficial impact.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/BF00051320
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_75806168</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>3552850</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>3552850</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c218t-6f78c0520358b0b3dfcb7ce33d77e8345ece50fd844ce3ec7b5ca8bc007c219b3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpFkM9PwjAUxxujQUQvnjXpyYPJ9HVd13IUBDXBH4l4XrquYyVsxXZE-e8tgnh6L-_zed_DF6FzAjcEgN8OxgDACI3hAHUJ4zTiccwOURf6jEcsTugxOvF-vrHSGDqoIygRaUK6qHqWdW1nTi6rNZZNgd-qtTfKyAYPnJa-xaNvWXssy1Y73FYa3xs5a6w3HtvyzxnKRgVsGizx9CsM6_CLbaLf_d348HuKjkq58PpsN3voYzyaDh-jyevD0_BuEqmYiDZKSy4UsBgoEznktChVzpWmtOBcC5owrTSDshBJEq5a8ZwpKXIVaggB_Zz20NU2d-ns50r7NquNV3qxkI22K59xJiAlqQji9VZUznrvdJktnamlW2cEsk2t2X-tQb7cpa7yWhd7dddj4BdbPvetdXtMGYsFA_oD44p7Rg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>75806168</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Mammography and Physician Breast Exams after the Diagnosis of Breast Cancer in a Twin or Non-Twin Sister</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing</source><source>SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings</source><creator>Richardson, Jean L. ; Danley, Kathleen ; Mondrus, Gencie T. ; Deapen, Dennis ; Mack, Thomas</creator><creatorcontrib>Richardson, Jean L. ; Danley, Kathleen ; Mondrus, Gencie T. ; Deapen, Dennis ; Mack, Thomas</creatorcontrib><description>Reports of breast-cancer-screening behavior were collected from 591 twin sisters of women with breast cancer and 182 non-twin sisters of the same women, and compared with the patterns found by national surveys. Timeline plots indicate that prior to the diagnosis of breast cancer in a sister, these women were being screened at prevailing rates. In the year after diagnosis, the annual frequency of use by them of both mammograms and physician breast exams increased by approximately 25 percent, but in subsequent years these rates dropped to a plateau no more than 10 to 15 percent higher than the baseline. The sisters over age 60 were screened with unusually low frequency, as were those with no partner in the home, those with no regular source of medical care, and especially the siblings of cases that died soon after the diagnosis. The relatively infrequent adoption of a long-term, annual, screening pattern in the face of certain knowledge of personal high risk gives cause for concern about the effectiveness of any intervention program requiring recognition of personal high risk for effectiveness. One cause for optimism is that higher screening rates prevail among those with co-twins diagnosed since 1980, suggesting that the increase in publicity and public education in recent decades has had a beneficial impact.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0957-5243</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1573-7225</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/BF00051320</identifier><identifier>PMID: 8318641</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Netherlands: Rapid Communications of Oxford Ltd</publisher><subject>Adult ; Age Factors ; Aged ; Breast cancer ; Breast Neoplasms - diagnosis ; Breast Neoplasms - mortality ; Breast Neoplasms - prevention &amp; control ; Cancer screening ; Diseases in Twins - diagnosis ; Diseases in Twins - epidemiology ; Diseases in Twins - prevention &amp; control ; Family - psychology ; Family history ; Female ; Health Behavior ; Health status ; Health Surveys ; Humans ; Mammography ; Mammography - psychology ; Mammography - utilization ; Mass Screening - psychology ; Mass Screening - utilization ; Middle Aged ; National health insurance ; Patient assessment ; Physical Examination - psychology ; Physical Examination - utilization ; Physicians ; Research Papers ; Sisters ; Survival Rate ; Twins ; Twins - psychology ; United States - epidemiology</subject><ispartof>Cancer causes &amp; control, 1993-05, Vol.4 (3), p.251-260</ispartof><rights>Copyright 1993 Rapid Communications of Oxford Ltd.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c218t-6f78c0520358b0b3dfcb7ce33d77e8345ece50fd844ce3ec7b5ca8bc007c219b3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c218t-6f78c0520358b0b3dfcb7ce33d77e8345ece50fd844ce3ec7b5ca8bc007c219b3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/3552850$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/3552850$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,803,27923,27924,58016,58249</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8318641$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Richardson, Jean L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Danley, Kathleen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mondrus, Gencie T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Deapen, Dennis</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mack, Thomas</creatorcontrib><title>Mammography and Physician Breast Exams after the Diagnosis of Breast Cancer in a Twin or Non-Twin Sister</title><title>Cancer causes &amp; control</title><addtitle>Cancer Causes Control</addtitle><description>Reports of breast-cancer-screening behavior were collected from 591 twin sisters of women with breast cancer and 182 non-twin sisters of the same women, and compared with the patterns found by national surveys. Timeline plots indicate that prior to the diagnosis of breast cancer in a sister, these women were being screened at prevailing rates. In the year after diagnosis, the annual frequency of use by them of both mammograms and physician breast exams increased by approximately 25 percent, but in subsequent years these rates dropped to a plateau no more than 10 to 15 percent higher than the baseline. The sisters over age 60 were screened with unusually low frequency, as were those with no partner in the home, those with no regular source of medical care, and especially the siblings of cases that died soon after the diagnosis. The relatively infrequent adoption of a long-term, annual, screening pattern in the face of certain knowledge of personal high risk gives cause for concern about the effectiveness of any intervention program requiring recognition of personal high risk for effectiveness. One cause for optimism is that higher screening rates prevail among those with co-twins diagnosed since 1980, suggesting that the increase in publicity and public education in recent decades has had a beneficial impact.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Age Factors</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Breast cancer</subject><subject>Breast Neoplasms - diagnosis</subject><subject>Breast Neoplasms - mortality</subject><subject>Breast Neoplasms - prevention &amp; control</subject><subject>Cancer screening</subject><subject>Diseases in Twins - diagnosis</subject><subject>Diseases in Twins - epidemiology</subject><subject>Diseases in Twins - prevention &amp; control</subject><subject>Family - psychology</subject><subject>Family history</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Health Behavior</subject><subject>Health status</subject><subject>Health Surveys</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Mammography</subject><subject>Mammography - psychology</subject><subject>Mammography - utilization</subject><subject>Mass Screening - psychology</subject><subject>Mass Screening - utilization</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>National health insurance</subject><subject>Patient assessment</subject><subject>Physical Examination - psychology</subject><subject>Physical Examination - utilization</subject><subject>Physicians</subject><subject>Research Papers</subject><subject>Sisters</subject><subject>Survival Rate</subject><subject>Twins</subject><subject>Twins - psychology</subject><subject>United States - epidemiology</subject><issn>0957-5243</issn><issn>1573-7225</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1993</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNpFkM9PwjAUxxujQUQvnjXpyYPJ9HVd13IUBDXBH4l4XrquYyVsxXZE-e8tgnh6L-_zed_DF6FzAjcEgN8OxgDACI3hAHUJ4zTiccwOURf6jEcsTugxOvF-vrHSGDqoIygRaUK6qHqWdW1nTi6rNZZNgd-qtTfKyAYPnJa-xaNvWXssy1Y73FYa3xs5a6w3HtvyzxnKRgVsGizx9CsM6_CLbaLf_d348HuKjkq58PpsN3voYzyaDh-jyevD0_BuEqmYiDZKSy4UsBgoEznktChVzpWmtOBcC5owrTSDshBJEq5a8ZwpKXIVaggB_Zz20NU2d-ns50r7NquNV3qxkI22K59xJiAlqQji9VZUznrvdJktnamlW2cEsk2t2X-tQb7cpa7yWhd7dddj4BdbPvetdXtMGYsFA_oD44p7Rg</recordid><startdate>19930501</startdate><enddate>19930501</enddate><creator>Richardson, Jean L.</creator><creator>Danley, Kathleen</creator><creator>Mondrus, Gencie T.</creator><creator>Deapen, Dennis</creator><creator>Mack, Thomas</creator><general>Rapid Communications of Oxford Ltd</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19930501</creationdate><title>Mammography and Physician Breast Exams after the Diagnosis of Breast Cancer in a Twin or Non-Twin Sister</title><author>Richardson, Jean L. ; Danley, Kathleen ; Mondrus, Gencie T. ; Deapen, Dennis ; Mack, Thomas</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c218t-6f78c0520358b0b3dfcb7ce33d77e8345ece50fd844ce3ec7b5ca8bc007c219b3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1993</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Age Factors</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Breast cancer</topic><topic>Breast Neoplasms - diagnosis</topic><topic>Breast Neoplasms - mortality</topic><topic>Breast Neoplasms - prevention &amp; control</topic><topic>Cancer screening</topic><topic>Diseases in Twins - diagnosis</topic><topic>Diseases in Twins - epidemiology</topic><topic>Diseases in Twins - prevention &amp; control</topic><topic>Family - psychology</topic><topic>Family history</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Health Behavior</topic><topic>Health status</topic><topic>Health Surveys</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Mammography</topic><topic>Mammography - psychology</topic><topic>Mammography - utilization</topic><topic>Mass Screening - psychology</topic><topic>Mass Screening - utilization</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>National health insurance</topic><topic>Patient assessment</topic><topic>Physical Examination - psychology</topic><topic>Physical Examination - utilization</topic><topic>Physicians</topic><topic>Research Papers</topic><topic>Sisters</topic><topic>Survival Rate</topic><topic>Twins</topic><topic>Twins - psychology</topic><topic>United States - epidemiology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Richardson, Jean L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Danley, Kathleen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mondrus, Gencie T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Deapen, Dennis</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mack, Thomas</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Cancer causes &amp; control</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Richardson, Jean L.</au><au>Danley, Kathleen</au><au>Mondrus, Gencie T.</au><au>Deapen, Dennis</au><au>Mack, Thomas</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Mammography and Physician Breast Exams after the Diagnosis of Breast Cancer in a Twin or Non-Twin Sister</atitle><jtitle>Cancer causes &amp; control</jtitle><addtitle>Cancer Causes Control</addtitle><date>1993-05-01</date><risdate>1993</risdate><volume>4</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>251</spage><epage>260</epage><pages>251-260</pages><issn>0957-5243</issn><eissn>1573-7225</eissn><abstract>Reports of breast-cancer-screening behavior were collected from 591 twin sisters of women with breast cancer and 182 non-twin sisters of the same women, and compared with the patterns found by national surveys. Timeline plots indicate that prior to the diagnosis of breast cancer in a sister, these women were being screened at prevailing rates. In the year after diagnosis, the annual frequency of use by them of both mammograms and physician breast exams increased by approximately 25 percent, but in subsequent years these rates dropped to a plateau no more than 10 to 15 percent higher than the baseline. The sisters over age 60 were screened with unusually low frequency, as were those with no partner in the home, those with no regular source of medical care, and especially the siblings of cases that died soon after the diagnosis. The relatively infrequent adoption of a long-term, annual, screening pattern in the face of certain knowledge of personal high risk gives cause for concern about the effectiveness of any intervention program requiring recognition of personal high risk for effectiveness. One cause for optimism is that higher screening rates prevail among those with co-twins diagnosed since 1980, suggesting that the increase in publicity and public education in recent decades has had a beneficial impact.</abstract><cop>Netherlands</cop><pub>Rapid Communications of Oxford Ltd</pub><pmid>8318641</pmid><doi>10.1007/BF00051320</doi><tpages>10</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0957-5243
ispartof Cancer causes & control, 1993-05, Vol.4 (3), p.251-260
issn 0957-5243
1573-7225
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_75806168
source MEDLINE; JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing; SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings
subjects Adult
Age Factors
Aged
Breast cancer
Breast Neoplasms - diagnosis
Breast Neoplasms - mortality
Breast Neoplasms - prevention & control
Cancer screening
Diseases in Twins - diagnosis
Diseases in Twins - epidemiology
Diseases in Twins - prevention & control
Family - psychology
Family history
Female
Health Behavior
Health status
Health Surveys
Humans
Mammography
Mammography - psychology
Mammography - utilization
Mass Screening - psychology
Mass Screening - utilization
Middle Aged
National health insurance
Patient assessment
Physical Examination - psychology
Physical Examination - utilization
Physicians
Research Papers
Sisters
Survival Rate
Twins
Twins - psychology
United States - epidemiology
title Mammography and Physician Breast Exams after the Diagnosis of Breast Cancer in a Twin or Non-Twin Sister
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-08T09%3A40%3A29IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Mammography%20and%20Physician%20Breast%20Exams%20after%20the%20Diagnosis%20of%20Breast%20Cancer%20in%20a%20Twin%20or%20Non-Twin%20Sister&rft.jtitle=Cancer%20causes%20&%20control&rft.au=Richardson,%20Jean%20L.&rft.date=1993-05-01&rft.volume=4&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=251&rft.epage=260&rft.pages=251-260&rft.issn=0957-5243&rft.eissn=1573-7225&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/BF00051320&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E3552850%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=75806168&rft_id=info:pmid/8318641&rft_jstor_id=3552850&rfr_iscdi=true