Physicians' views on hormone therapy around and after menopause

Estrogens and progestins are commonly and increasingly used during and after menopause. We studied Finnish physicians' views of this hormone therapy based on their specialty. A questionnaire was sent to a stratified random sample of gynecologists, internists, general practitioners and nonspecia...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Maturitas 1993-05, Vol.16 (3), p.163-173
Hauptverfasser: Hemminki, Elina, Topo, Päivi, Malin, Maili, Kangas, Ilka
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 173
container_issue 3
container_start_page 163
container_title Maturitas
container_volume 16
creator Hemminki, Elina
Topo, Päivi
Malin, Maili
Kangas, Ilka
description Estrogens and progestins are commonly and increasingly used during and after menopause. We studied Finnish physicians' views of this hormone therapy based on their specialty. A questionnaire was sent to a stratified random sample of gynecologists, internists, general practitioners and nonspecialists n = 500; response rate 74%). Reported prescription habits and opinions concerning benefits and harms of hormones were asked and compared to current literature. Combined therapy was much more popular than was estrogen alone. One fourth of the physicians said hormones should be preventively given to all or to all those at risk for osteoporosis. Long therapies were accepted by many and for our patient cases hormones were recommended much more commonly than were other medical therapies. Most considered prevention of osteoporosis to be a benefit of combined therapy, but opinions of other benefits and harms varied. Gynecologists had the most favourable opinions and most of them considered hormone therapy very useful; the other physicians' opinions were characterized by uncertainities about hormone therapy and its long term effects.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/0378-5122(93)90062-M
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_75802102</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>037851229390062M</els_id><sourcerecordid>75802102</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c386t-96cf201e823cd5087b613c2b384bd9adcd9a608e4dbca1e919e7e2881108812d3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kMlOwzAQhi0EKmV5A5ByQCyHgMfO4lxAqGKTWsEBzpZjT1SjJi52Aurbk9CqRw4zc_i_GY0-Qk6AXgOF7IbyXMQpMHZZ8KuC0ozFsx0yBpHzOAGAXTLeIvvkIIRPSmlKeTIiI5FCmkM2Jndv81Ww2qomXETfFn9C5Jpo7nztGozaOXq1XEXKu64xkRqqatFHNTZuqbqAR2SvUouAx5t5SD4eH94nz_H09ellcj-NNRdZGxeZrhgFFIxrk1KRlxlwzUouktIUyui-ZVRgYkqtAAsoMEcmBADtGzP8kJyv7y69--owtLK2QeNioRp0XZB5KigDynowWYPauxA8VnLpba38SgKVgzc5SJGDFFlw-edNzvq10839rqzRbJc2ovr8bJOroNWi8qrRNmyxJE_SJC967HaNYe-i1-ll0BYbjcZ61K00zv7_xy9md4if</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>75802102</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Physicians' views on hormone therapy around and after menopause</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)</source><creator>Hemminki, Elina ; Topo, Päivi ; Malin, Maili ; Kangas, Ilka</creator><creatorcontrib>Hemminki, Elina ; Topo, Päivi ; Malin, Maili ; Kangas, Ilka</creatorcontrib><description>Estrogens and progestins are commonly and increasingly used during and after menopause. We studied Finnish physicians' views of this hormone therapy based on their specialty. A questionnaire was sent to a stratified random sample of gynecologists, internists, general practitioners and nonspecialists n = 500; response rate 74%). Reported prescription habits and opinions concerning benefits and harms of hormones were asked and compared to current literature. Combined therapy was much more popular than was estrogen alone. One fourth of the physicians said hormones should be preventively given to all or to all those at risk for osteoporosis. Long therapies were accepted by many and for our patient cases hormones were recommended much more commonly than were other medical therapies. Most considered prevention of osteoporosis to be a benefit of combined therapy, but opinions of other benefits and harms varied. Gynecologists had the most favourable opinions and most of them considered hormone therapy very useful; the other physicians' opinions were characterized by uncertainities about hormone therapy and its long term effects.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0378-5122</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-4111</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/0378-5122(93)90062-M</identifier><identifier>PMID: 8515716</identifier><identifier>CODEN: MATUDK</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Shannon: Elsevier Ireland Ltd</publisher><subject>Attitude of Health Personnel ; Biological and medical sciences ; Estrogen Replacement Therapy ; estrogens ; Family Practice ; Female ; Gynecology ; hormone therapy ; Hormones. Endocrine system ; Humans ; Internal Medicine ; Medical sciences ; Menopause ; Middle Aged ; Pharmacology. Drug treatments ; Physicians ; postmenopause ; prescribing ; progestins ; Surveys and Questionnaires</subject><ispartof>Maturitas, 1993-05, Vol.16 (3), p.163-173</ispartof><rights>1993</rights><rights>1993 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c386t-96cf201e823cd5087b613c2b384bd9adcd9a608e4dbca1e919e7e2881108812d3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c386t-96cf201e823cd5087b613c2b384bd9adcd9a608e4dbca1e919e7e2881108812d3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0378-5122(93)90062-M$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3550,27924,27925,45995</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=4745479$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8515716$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Hemminki, Elina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Topo, Päivi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Malin, Maili</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kangas, Ilka</creatorcontrib><title>Physicians' views on hormone therapy around and after menopause</title><title>Maturitas</title><addtitle>Maturitas</addtitle><description>Estrogens and progestins are commonly and increasingly used during and after menopause. We studied Finnish physicians' views of this hormone therapy based on their specialty. A questionnaire was sent to a stratified random sample of gynecologists, internists, general practitioners and nonspecialists n = 500; response rate 74%). Reported prescription habits and opinions concerning benefits and harms of hormones were asked and compared to current literature. Combined therapy was much more popular than was estrogen alone. One fourth of the physicians said hormones should be preventively given to all or to all those at risk for osteoporosis. Long therapies were accepted by many and for our patient cases hormones were recommended much more commonly than were other medical therapies. Most considered prevention of osteoporosis to be a benefit of combined therapy, but opinions of other benefits and harms varied. Gynecologists had the most favourable opinions and most of them considered hormone therapy very useful; the other physicians' opinions were characterized by uncertainities about hormone therapy and its long term effects.</description><subject>Attitude of Health Personnel</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Estrogen Replacement Therapy</subject><subject>estrogens</subject><subject>Family Practice</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Gynecology</subject><subject>hormone therapy</subject><subject>Hormones. Endocrine system</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Internal Medicine</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Menopause</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Pharmacology. Drug treatments</subject><subject>Physicians</subject><subject>postmenopause</subject><subject>prescribing</subject><subject>progestins</subject><subject>Surveys and Questionnaires</subject><issn>0378-5122</issn><issn>1873-4111</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1993</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kMlOwzAQhi0EKmV5A5ByQCyHgMfO4lxAqGKTWsEBzpZjT1SjJi52Aurbk9CqRw4zc_i_GY0-Qk6AXgOF7IbyXMQpMHZZ8KuC0ozFsx0yBpHzOAGAXTLeIvvkIIRPSmlKeTIiI5FCmkM2Jndv81Ww2qomXETfFn9C5Jpo7nztGozaOXq1XEXKu64xkRqqatFHNTZuqbqAR2SvUouAx5t5SD4eH94nz_H09ellcj-NNRdZGxeZrhgFFIxrk1KRlxlwzUouktIUyui-ZVRgYkqtAAsoMEcmBADtGzP8kJyv7y69--owtLK2QeNioRp0XZB5KigDynowWYPauxA8VnLpba38SgKVgzc5SJGDFFlw-edNzvq10839rqzRbJc2ovr8bJOroNWi8qrRNmyxJE_SJC967HaNYe-i1-ll0BYbjcZ61K00zv7_xy9md4if</recordid><startdate>19930501</startdate><enddate>19930501</enddate><creator>Hemminki, Elina</creator><creator>Topo, Päivi</creator><creator>Malin, Maili</creator><creator>Kangas, Ilka</creator><general>Elsevier Ireland Ltd</general><general>Elsevier Science</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19930501</creationdate><title>Physicians' views on hormone therapy around and after menopause</title><author>Hemminki, Elina ; Topo, Päivi ; Malin, Maili ; Kangas, Ilka</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c386t-96cf201e823cd5087b613c2b384bd9adcd9a608e4dbca1e919e7e2881108812d3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1993</creationdate><topic>Attitude of Health Personnel</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Estrogen Replacement Therapy</topic><topic>estrogens</topic><topic>Family Practice</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Gynecology</topic><topic>hormone therapy</topic><topic>Hormones. Endocrine system</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Internal Medicine</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Menopause</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Pharmacology. Drug treatments</topic><topic>Physicians</topic><topic>postmenopause</topic><topic>prescribing</topic><topic>progestins</topic><topic>Surveys and Questionnaires</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Hemminki, Elina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Topo, Päivi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Malin, Maili</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kangas, Ilka</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Maturitas</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Hemminki, Elina</au><au>Topo, Päivi</au><au>Malin, Maili</au><au>Kangas, Ilka</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Physicians' views on hormone therapy around and after menopause</atitle><jtitle>Maturitas</jtitle><addtitle>Maturitas</addtitle><date>1993-05-01</date><risdate>1993</risdate><volume>16</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>163</spage><epage>173</epage><pages>163-173</pages><issn>0378-5122</issn><eissn>1873-4111</eissn><coden>MATUDK</coden><abstract>Estrogens and progestins are commonly and increasingly used during and after menopause. We studied Finnish physicians' views of this hormone therapy based on their specialty. A questionnaire was sent to a stratified random sample of gynecologists, internists, general practitioners and nonspecialists n = 500; response rate 74%). Reported prescription habits and opinions concerning benefits and harms of hormones were asked and compared to current literature. Combined therapy was much more popular than was estrogen alone. One fourth of the physicians said hormones should be preventively given to all or to all those at risk for osteoporosis. Long therapies were accepted by many and for our patient cases hormones were recommended much more commonly than were other medical therapies. Most considered prevention of osteoporosis to be a benefit of combined therapy, but opinions of other benefits and harms varied. Gynecologists had the most favourable opinions and most of them considered hormone therapy very useful; the other physicians' opinions were characterized by uncertainities about hormone therapy and its long term effects.</abstract><cop>Shannon</cop><pub>Elsevier Ireland Ltd</pub><pmid>8515716</pmid><doi>10.1016/0378-5122(93)90062-M</doi><tpages>11</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0378-5122
ispartof Maturitas, 1993-05, Vol.16 (3), p.163-173
issn 0378-5122
1873-4111
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_75802102
source MEDLINE; Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)
subjects Attitude of Health Personnel
Biological and medical sciences
Estrogen Replacement Therapy
estrogens
Family Practice
Female
Gynecology
hormone therapy
Hormones. Endocrine system
Humans
Internal Medicine
Medical sciences
Menopause
Middle Aged
Pharmacology. Drug treatments
Physicians
postmenopause
prescribing
progestins
Surveys and Questionnaires
title Physicians' views on hormone therapy around and after menopause
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-30T23%3A51%3A01IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Physicians'%20views%20on%20hormone%20therapy%20around%20and%20after%20menopause&rft.jtitle=Maturitas&rft.au=Hemminki,%20Elina&rft.date=1993-05-01&rft.volume=16&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=163&rft.epage=173&rft.pages=163-173&rft.issn=0378-5122&rft.eissn=1873-4111&rft.coden=MATUDK&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/0378-5122(93)90062-M&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E75802102%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=75802102&rft_id=info:pmid/8515716&rft_els_id=037851229390062M&rfr_iscdi=true