Physicians' views on hormone therapy around and after menopause
Estrogens and progestins are commonly and increasingly used during and after menopause. We studied Finnish physicians' views of this hormone therapy based on their specialty. A questionnaire was sent to a stratified random sample of gynecologists, internists, general practitioners and nonspecia...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Maturitas 1993-05, Vol.16 (3), p.163-173 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 173 |
---|---|
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 163 |
container_title | Maturitas |
container_volume | 16 |
creator | Hemminki, Elina Topo, Päivi Malin, Maili Kangas, Ilka |
description | Estrogens and progestins are commonly and increasingly used during and after menopause. We studied Finnish physicians' views of this hormone therapy based on their specialty. A questionnaire was sent to a stratified random sample of gynecologists, internists, general practitioners and nonspecialists
n = 500; response rate 74%). Reported prescription habits and opinions concerning benefits and harms of hormones were asked and compared to current literature. Combined therapy was much more popular than was estrogen alone. One fourth of the physicians said hormones should be preventively given to all or to all those at risk for osteoporosis. Long therapies were accepted by many and for our patient cases hormones were recommended much more commonly than were other medical therapies. Most considered prevention of osteoporosis to be a benefit of combined therapy, but opinions of other benefits and harms varied. Gynecologists had the most favourable opinions and most of them considered hormone therapy very useful; the other physicians' opinions were characterized by uncertainities about hormone therapy and its long term effects. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/0378-5122(93)90062-M |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_75802102</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>037851229390062M</els_id><sourcerecordid>75802102</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c386t-96cf201e823cd5087b613c2b384bd9adcd9a608e4dbca1e919e7e2881108812d3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kMlOwzAQhi0EKmV5A5ByQCyHgMfO4lxAqGKTWsEBzpZjT1SjJi52Aurbk9CqRw4zc_i_GY0-Qk6AXgOF7IbyXMQpMHZZ8KuC0ozFsx0yBpHzOAGAXTLeIvvkIIRPSmlKeTIiI5FCmkM2Jndv81Ww2qomXETfFn9C5Jpo7nztGozaOXq1XEXKu64xkRqqatFHNTZuqbqAR2SvUouAx5t5SD4eH94nz_H09ellcj-NNRdZGxeZrhgFFIxrk1KRlxlwzUouktIUyui-ZVRgYkqtAAsoMEcmBADtGzP8kJyv7y69--owtLK2QeNioRp0XZB5KigDynowWYPauxA8VnLpba38SgKVgzc5SJGDFFlw-edNzvq10839rqzRbJc2ovr8bJOroNWi8qrRNmyxJE_SJC967HaNYe-i1-ll0BYbjcZ61K00zv7_xy9md4if</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>75802102</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Physicians' views on hormone therapy around and after menopause</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)</source><creator>Hemminki, Elina ; Topo, Päivi ; Malin, Maili ; Kangas, Ilka</creator><creatorcontrib>Hemminki, Elina ; Topo, Päivi ; Malin, Maili ; Kangas, Ilka</creatorcontrib><description>Estrogens and progestins are commonly and increasingly used during and after menopause. We studied Finnish physicians' views of this hormone therapy based on their specialty. A questionnaire was sent to a stratified random sample of gynecologists, internists, general practitioners and nonspecialists
n = 500; response rate 74%). Reported prescription habits and opinions concerning benefits and harms of hormones were asked and compared to current literature. Combined therapy was much more popular than was estrogen alone. One fourth of the physicians said hormones should be preventively given to all or to all those at risk for osteoporosis. Long therapies were accepted by many and for our patient cases hormones were recommended much more commonly than were other medical therapies. Most considered prevention of osteoporosis to be a benefit of combined therapy, but opinions of other benefits and harms varied. Gynecologists had the most favourable opinions and most of them considered hormone therapy very useful; the other physicians' opinions were characterized by uncertainities about hormone therapy and its long term effects.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0378-5122</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-4111</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/0378-5122(93)90062-M</identifier><identifier>PMID: 8515716</identifier><identifier>CODEN: MATUDK</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Shannon: Elsevier Ireland Ltd</publisher><subject>Attitude of Health Personnel ; Biological and medical sciences ; Estrogen Replacement Therapy ; estrogens ; Family Practice ; Female ; Gynecology ; hormone therapy ; Hormones. Endocrine system ; Humans ; Internal Medicine ; Medical sciences ; Menopause ; Middle Aged ; Pharmacology. Drug treatments ; Physicians ; postmenopause ; prescribing ; progestins ; Surveys and Questionnaires</subject><ispartof>Maturitas, 1993-05, Vol.16 (3), p.163-173</ispartof><rights>1993</rights><rights>1993 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c386t-96cf201e823cd5087b613c2b384bd9adcd9a608e4dbca1e919e7e2881108812d3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c386t-96cf201e823cd5087b613c2b384bd9adcd9a608e4dbca1e919e7e2881108812d3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0378-5122(93)90062-M$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3550,27924,27925,45995</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=4745479$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8515716$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Hemminki, Elina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Topo, Päivi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Malin, Maili</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kangas, Ilka</creatorcontrib><title>Physicians' views on hormone therapy around and after menopause</title><title>Maturitas</title><addtitle>Maturitas</addtitle><description>Estrogens and progestins are commonly and increasingly used during and after menopause. We studied Finnish physicians' views of this hormone therapy based on their specialty. A questionnaire was sent to a stratified random sample of gynecologists, internists, general practitioners and nonspecialists
n = 500; response rate 74%). Reported prescription habits and opinions concerning benefits and harms of hormones were asked and compared to current literature. Combined therapy was much more popular than was estrogen alone. One fourth of the physicians said hormones should be preventively given to all or to all those at risk for osteoporosis. Long therapies were accepted by many and for our patient cases hormones were recommended much more commonly than were other medical therapies. Most considered prevention of osteoporosis to be a benefit of combined therapy, but opinions of other benefits and harms varied. Gynecologists had the most favourable opinions and most of them considered hormone therapy very useful; the other physicians' opinions were characterized by uncertainities about hormone therapy and its long term effects.</description><subject>Attitude of Health Personnel</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Estrogen Replacement Therapy</subject><subject>estrogens</subject><subject>Family Practice</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Gynecology</subject><subject>hormone therapy</subject><subject>Hormones. Endocrine system</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Internal Medicine</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Menopause</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Pharmacology. Drug treatments</subject><subject>Physicians</subject><subject>postmenopause</subject><subject>prescribing</subject><subject>progestins</subject><subject>Surveys and Questionnaires</subject><issn>0378-5122</issn><issn>1873-4111</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1993</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kMlOwzAQhi0EKmV5A5ByQCyHgMfO4lxAqGKTWsEBzpZjT1SjJi52Aurbk9CqRw4zc_i_GY0-Qk6AXgOF7IbyXMQpMHZZ8KuC0ozFsx0yBpHzOAGAXTLeIvvkIIRPSmlKeTIiI5FCmkM2Jndv81Ww2qomXETfFn9C5Jpo7nztGozaOXq1XEXKu64xkRqqatFHNTZuqbqAR2SvUouAx5t5SD4eH94nz_H09ellcj-NNRdZGxeZrhgFFIxrk1KRlxlwzUouktIUyui-ZVRgYkqtAAsoMEcmBADtGzP8kJyv7y69--owtLK2QeNioRp0XZB5KigDynowWYPauxA8VnLpba38SgKVgzc5SJGDFFlw-edNzvq10839rqzRbJc2ovr8bJOroNWi8qrRNmyxJE_SJC967HaNYe-i1-ll0BYbjcZ61K00zv7_xy9md4if</recordid><startdate>19930501</startdate><enddate>19930501</enddate><creator>Hemminki, Elina</creator><creator>Topo, Päivi</creator><creator>Malin, Maili</creator><creator>Kangas, Ilka</creator><general>Elsevier Ireland Ltd</general><general>Elsevier Science</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19930501</creationdate><title>Physicians' views on hormone therapy around and after menopause</title><author>Hemminki, Elina ; Topo, Päivi ; Malin, Maili ; Kangas, Ilka</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c386t-96cf201e823cd5087b613c2b384bd9adcd9a608e4dbca1e919e7e2881108812d3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1993</creationdate><topic>Attitude of Health Personnel</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Estrogen Replacement Therapy</topic><topic>estrogens</topic><topic>Family Practice</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Gynecology</topic><topic>hormone therapy</topic><topic>Hormones. Endocrine system</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Internal Medicine</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Menopause</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Pharmacology. Drug treatments</topic><topic>Physicians</topic><topic>postmenopause</topic><topic>prescribing</topic><topic>progestins</topic><topic>Surveys and Questionnaires</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Hemminki, Elina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Topo, Päivi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Malin, Maili</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kangas, Ilka</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Maturitas</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Hemminki, Elina</au><au>Topo, Päivi</au><au>Malin, Maili</au><au>Kangas, Ilka</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Physicians' views on hormone therapy around and after menopause</atitle><jtitle>Maturitas</jtitle><addtitle>Maturitas</addtitle><date>1993-05-01</date><risdate>1993</risdate><volume>16</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>163</spage><epage>173</epage><pages>163-173</pages><issn>0378-5122</issn><eissn>1873-4111</eissn><coden>MATUDK</coden><abstract>Estrogens and progestins are commonly and increasingly used during and after menopause. We studied Finnish physicians' views of this hormone therapy based on their specialty. A questionnaire was sent to a stratified random sample of gynecologists, internists, general practitioners and nonspecialists
n = 500; response rate 74%). Reported prescription habits and opinions concerning benefits and harms of hormones were asked and compared to current literature. Combined therapy was much more popular than was estrogen alone. One fourth of the physicians said hormones should be preventively given to all or to all those at risk for osteoporosis. Long therapies were accepted by many and for our patient cases hormones were recommended much more commonly than were other medical therapies. Most considered prevention of osteoporosis to be a benefit of combined therapy, but opinions of other benefits and harms varied. Gynecologists had the most favourable opinions and most of them considered hormone therapy very useful; the other physicians' opinions were characterized by uncertainities about hormone therapy and its long term effects.</abstract><cop>Shannon</cop><pub>Elsevier Ireland Ltd</pub><pmid>8515716</pmid><doi>10.1016/0378-5122(93)90062-M</doi><tpages>11</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0378-5122 |
ispartof | Maturitas, 1993-05, Vol.16 (3), p.163-173 |
issn | 0378-5122 1873-4111 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_75802102 |
source | MEDLINE; Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier) |
subjects | Attitude of Health Personnel Biological and medical sciences Estrogen Replacement Therapy estrogens Family Practice Female Gynecology hormone therapy Hormones. Endocrine system Humans Internal Medicine Medical sciences Menopause Middle Aged Pharmacology. Drug treatments Physicians postmenopause prescribing progestins Surveys and Questionnaires |
title | Physicians' views on hormone therapy around and after menopause |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-30T23%3A51%3A01IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Physicians'%20views%20on%20hormone%20therapy%20around%20and%20after%20menopause&rft.jtitle=Maturitas&rft.au=Hemminki,%20Elina&rft.date=1993-05-01&rft.volume=16&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=163&rft.epage=173&rft.pages=163-173&rft.issn=0378-5122&rft.eissn=1873-4111&rft.coden=MATUDK&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/0378-5122(93)90062-M&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E75802102%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=75802102&rft_id=info:pmid/8515716&rft_els_id=037851229390062M&rfr_iscdi=true |