Senile Reticular Pigmentary Degeneration

Of 104 consecutive patients with senile reticular pigmentary degeneration (207 eyes), 85 patients (82%) were more than 60 years old (mean age, 69.2 ± 8.54 years). Forty-nine (47%) were men and 55 (53%) were women. Peripheral visual fields were not characteristically constricted. Although most eyes t...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:American journal of ophthalmology 1984-12, Vol.98 (6), p.717-722
Hauptverfasser: Humphrey, William T., Carlson, Richard E., Valone, James A.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 722
container_issue 6
container_start_page 717
container_title American journal of ophthalmology
container_volume 98
creator Humphrey, William T.
Carlson, Richard E.
Valone, James A.
description Of 104 consecutive patients with senile reticular pigmentary degeneration (207 eyes), 85 patients (82%) were more than 60 years old (mean age, 69.2 ± 8.54 years). Forty-nine (47%) were men and 55 (53%) were women. Peripheral visual fields were not characteristically constricted. Although most eyes tested had visual acuities of 20/50 or better, 69 eyes (33%) had visual acuities of 20/100 or worse. A total of 136 eyes (66%) had senile macular degeneration at the time senile reticular pigmentary degeneration was first diagnosed, whereas only 43 control eyes (21%) from the same referral population also had senile macular degeneration (P < .001). Macular degeneration was the primary cause for reduced vision when it was noted. In no instance could reduced visual acuity or constricted visual fields be attributed to the senile reticular pigmentary degeneration alone. Senile reticular pigmentary degeneration on routine ophthalmoscopy should alert the clinician to the possibility of co-existing macular degenerative disease.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/0002-9394(84)90686-X
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_75799033</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>000293948490686X</els_id><sourcerecordid>75799033</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c386t-11146dca630b671cac4ff68e7819594a172c73bac21506af2851c3c8925a0833</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kEtLAzEUhYMotVb_gUIXInUxmkzeG0HqEwqKdtFdSDN3SmQemswI_ntn7NClq8vlfPdyzkHolOArgom4xhiniaaazRS71Fgokaz20JgoqROiNNlH4x1yiI5i_OhWIZkcoZHgWHJGx2j2DpUvYPoGjXdtYcP01W9KqBobfqZ3sIEKgm18XR2jg9wWEU6GOUHLh_vl_ClZvDw-z28XiaNKNAkhhInMWUHxWkjirGN5LhRIRTTXzBKZOknX1qWEY2HzVHHiqFM65RYrSifoYvv2M9RfLcTGlD46KApbQd1GI7nUGtMeZFvQhTrGALn5DL7sXBuCTd-P6cObPrxRzPz1Y1bd2dnwv12XkO2OhkI6_XzQbXS2yIOtnI87TGmeplR22M0Wg66Kbw_BROehcpD5AK4xWe3_9_ELSzJ_bw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>75799033</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Senile Reticular Pigmentary Degeneration</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Humphrey, William T. ; Carlson, Richard E. ; Valone, James A.</creator><creatorcontrib>Humphrey, William T. ; Carlson, Richard E. ; Valone, James A.</creatorcontrib><description>Of 104 consecutive patients with senile reticular pigmentary degeneration (207 eyes), 85 patients (82%) were more than 60 years old (mean age, 69.2 ± 8.54 years). Forty-nine (47%) were men and 55 (53%) were women. Peripheral visual fields were not characteristically constricted. Although most eyes tested had visual acuities of 20/50 or better, 69 eyes (33%) had visual acuities of 20/100 or worse. A total of 136 eyes (66%) had senile macular degeneration at the time senile reticular pigmentary degeneration was first diagnosed, whereas only 43 control eyes (21%) from the same referral population also had senile macular degeneration (P &lt; .001). Macular degeneration was the primary cause for reduced vision when it was noted. In no instance could reduced visual acuity or constricted visual fields be attributed to the senile reticular pigmentary degeneration alone. Senile reticular pigmentary degeneration on routine ophthalmoscopy should alert the clinician to the possibility of co-existing macular degenerative disease.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0002-9394</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1879-1891</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/0002-9394(84)90686-X</identifier><identifier>PMID: 6507543</identifier><identifier>CODEN: AJOPAA</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York, NY: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Aged ; Aging ; Biological and medical sciences ; Female ; Fluorescein Angiography ; Fundus Oculi ; Humans ; Male ; Medical sciences ; Middle Aged ; Ophthalmology ; Pigment Epithelium of Eye - pathology ; Retinal Degeneration - diagnosis ; Retinopathies ; Visual Acuity ; Visual Fields</subject><ispartof>American journal of ophthalmology, 1984-12, Vol.98 (6), p.717-722</ispartof><rights>1984 Elsevier Inc.</rights><rights>1985 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c386t-11146dca630b671cac4ff68e7819594a172c73bac21506af2851c3c8925a0833</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c386t-11146dca630b671cac4ff68e7819594a172c73bac21506af2851c3c8925a0833</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/000293948490686X$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,27903,27904,65309</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=8952237$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/6507543$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Humphrey, William T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Carlson, Richard E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Valone, James A.</creatorcontrib><title>Senile Reticular Pigmentary Degeneration</title><title>American journal of ophthalmology</title><addtitle>Am J Ophthalmol</addtitle><description>Of 104 consecutive patients with senile reticular pigmentary degeneration (207 eyes), 85 patients (82%) were more than 60 years old (mean age, 69.2 ± 8.54 years). Forty-nine (47%) were men and 55 (53%) were women. Peripheral visual fields were not characteristically constricted. Although most eyes tested had visual acuities of 20/50 or better, 69 eyes (33%) had visual acuities of 20/100 or worse. A total of 136 eyes (66%) had senile macular degeneration at the time senile reticular pigmentary degeneration was first diagnosed, whereas only 43 control eyes (21%) from the same referral population also had senile macular degeneration (P &lt; .001). Macular degeneration was the primary cause for reduced vision when it was noted. In no instance could reduced visual acuity or constricted visual fields be attributed to the senile reticular pigmentary degeneration alone. Senile reticular pigmentary degeneration on routine ophthalmoscopy should alert the clinician to the possibility of co-existing macular degenerative disease.</description><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Aging</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Fluorescein Angiography</subject><subject>Fundus Oculi</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Ophthalmology</subject><subject>Pigment Epithelium of Eye - pathology</subject><subject>Retinal Degeneration - diagnosis</subject><subject>Retinopathies</subject><subject>Visual Acuity</subject><subject>Visual Fields</subject><issn>0002-9394</issn><issn>1879-1891</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1984</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kEtLAzEUhYMotVb_gUIXInUxmkzeG0HqEwqKdtFdSDN3SmQemswI_ntn7NClq8vlfPdyzkHolOArgom4xhiniaaazRS71Fgokaz20JgoqROiNNlH4x1yiI5i_OhWIZkcoZHgWHJGx2j2DpUvYPoGjXdtYcP01W9KqBobfqZ3sIEKgm18XR2jg9wWEU6GOUHLh_vl_ClZvDw-z28XiaNKNAkhhInMWUHxWkjirGN5LhRIRTTXzBKZOknX1qWEY2HzVHHiqFM65RYrSifoYvv2M9RfLcTGlD46KApbQd1GI7nUGtMeZFvQhTrGALn5DL7sXBuCTd-P6cObPrxRzPz1Y1bd2dnwv12XkO2OhkI6_XzQbXS2yIOtnI87TGmeplR22M0Wg66Kbw_BROehcpD5AK4xWe3_9_ELSzJ_bw</recordid><startdate>19841215</startdate><enddate>19841215</enddate><creator>Humphrey, William T.</creator><creator>Carlson, Richard E.</creator><creator>Valone, James A.</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><general>Elsevier</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19841215</creationdate><title>Senile Reticular Pigmentary Degeneration</title><author>Humphrey, William T. ; Carlson, Richard E. ; Valone, James A.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c386t-11146dca630b671cac4ff68e7819594a172c73bac21506af2851c3c8925a0833</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1984</creationdate><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Aging</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Fluorescein Angiography</topic><topic>Fundus Oculi</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Ophthalmology</topic><topic>Pigment Epithelium of Eye - pathology</topic><topic>Retinal Degeneration - diagnosis</topic><topic>Retinopathies</topic><topic>Visual Acuity</topic><topic>Visual Fields</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Humphrey, William T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Carlson, Richard E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Valone, James A.</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>American journal of ophthalmology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Humphrey, William T.</au><au>Carlson, Richard E.</au><au>Valone, James A.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Senile Reticular Pigmentary Degeneration</atitle><jtitle>American journal of ophthalmology</jtitle><addtitle>Am J Ophthalmol</addtitle><date>1984-12-15</date><risdate>1984</risdate><volume>98</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>717</spage><epage>722</epage><pages>717-722</pages><issn>0002-9394</issn><eissn>1879-1891</eissn><coden>AJOPAA</coden><abstract>Of 104 consecutive patients with senile reticular pigmentary degeneration (207 eyes), 85 patients (82%) were more than 60 years old (mean age, 69.2 ± 8.54 years). Forty-nine (47%) were men and 55 (53%) were women. Peripheral visual fields were not characteristically constricted. Although most eyes tested had visual acuities of 20/50 or better, 69 eyes (33%) had visual acuities of 20/100 or worse. A total of 136 eyes (66%) had senile macular degeneration at the time senile reticular pigmentary degeneration was first diagnosed, whereas only 43 control eyes (21%) from the same referral population also had senile macular degeneration (P &lt; .001). Macular degeneration was the primary cause for reduced vision when it was noted. In no instance could reduced visual acuity or constricted visual fields be attributed to the senile reticular pigmentary degeneration alone. Senile reticular pigmentary degeneration on routine ophthalmoscopy should alert the clinician to the possibility of co-existing macular degenerative disease.</abstract><cop>New York, NY</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>6507543</pmid><doi>10.1016/0002-9394(84)90686-X</doi><tpages>6</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0002-9394
ispartof American journal of ophthalmology, 1984-12, Vol.98 (6), p.717-722
issn 0002-9394
1879-1891
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_75799033
source MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals
subjects Aged
Aging
Biological and medical sciences
Female
Fluorescein Angiography
Fundus Oculi
Humans
Male
Medical sciences
Middle Aged
Ophthalmology
Pigment Epithelium of Eye - pathology
Retinal Degeneration - diagnosis
Retinopathies
Visual Acuity
Visual Fields
title Senile Reticular Pigmentary Degeneration
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-28T00%3A11%3A52IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Senile%20Reticular%20Pigmentary%20Degeneration&rft.jtitle=American%20journal%20of%20ophthalmology&rft.au=Humphrey,%20William%20T.&rft.date=1984-12-15&rft.volume=98&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=717&rft.epage=722&rft.pages=717-722&rft.issn=0002-9394&rft.eissn=1879-1891&rft.coden=AJOPAA&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/0002-9394(84)90686-X&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E75799033%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=75799033&rft_id=info:pmid/6507543&rft_els_id=000293948490686X&rfr_iscdi=true