Senile Reticular Pigmentary Degeneration
Of 104 consecutive patients with senile reticular pigmentary degeneration (207 eyes), 85 patients (82%) were more than 60 years old (mean age, 69.2 ± 8.54 years). Forty-nine (47%) were men and 55 (53%) were women. Peripheral visual fields were not characteristically constricted. Although most eyes t...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | American journal of ophthalmology 1984-12, Vol.98 (6), p.717-722 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 722 |
---|---|
container_issue | 6 |
container_start_page | 717 |
container_title | American journal of ophthalmology |
container_volume | 98 |
creator | Humphrey, William T. Carlson, Richard E. Valone, James A. |
description | Of 104 consecutive patients with senile reticular pigmentary degeneration (207 eyes), 85 patients (82%) were more than 60 years old (mean age, 69.2 ± 8.54 years). Forty-nine (47%) were men and 55 (53%) were women.
Peripheral visual fields were not characteristically constricted. Although most eyes tested had visual acuities of 20/50 or better, 69 eyes (33%) had visual acuities of 20/100 or worse. A total of 136 eyes (66%) had senile macular degeneration at the time senile reticular pigmentary degeneration was first diagnosed, whereas only 43 control eyes (21%) from the same referral population also had senile macular degeneration (P < .001). Macular degeneration was the primary cause for reduced vision when it was noted. In no instance could reduced visual acuity or constricted visual fields be attributed to the senile reticular pigmentary degeneration alone.
Senile reticular pigmentary degeneration on routine ophthalmoscopy should alert the clinician to the possibility of co-existing macular degenerative disease. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/0002-9394(84)90686-X |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_75799033</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>000293948490686X</els_id><sourcerecordid>75799033</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c386t-11146dca630b671cac4ff68e7819594a172c73bac21506af2851c3c8925a0833</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kEtLAzEUhYMotVb_gUIXInUxmkzeG0HqEwqKdtFdSDN3SmQemswI_ntn7NClq8vlfPdyzkHolOArgom4xhiniaaazRS71Fgokaz20JgoqROiNNlH4x1yiI5i_OhWIZkcoZHgWHJGx2j2DpUvYPoGjXdtYcP01W9KqBobfqZ3sIEKgm18XR2jg9wWEU6GOUHLh_vl_ClZvDw-z28XiaNKNAkhhInMWUHxWkjirGN5LhRIRTTXzBKZOknX1qWEY2HzVHHiqFM65RYrSifoYvv2M9RfLcTGlD46KApbQd1GI7nUGtMeZFvQhTrGALn5DL7sXBuCTd-P6cObPrxRzPz1Y1bd2dnwv12XkO2OhkI6_XzQbXS2yIOtnI87TGmeplR22M0Wg66Kbw_BROehcpD5AK4xWe3_9_ELSzJ_bw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>75799033</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Senile Reticular Pigmentary Degeneration</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Humphrey, William T. ; Carlson, Richard E. ; Valone, James A.</creator><creatorcontrib>Humphrey, William T. ; Carlson, Richard E. ; Valone, James A.</creatorcontrib><description>Of 104 consecutive patients with senile reticular pigmentary degeneration (207 eyes), 85 patients (82%) were more than 60 years old (mean age, 69.2 ± 8.54 years). Forty-nine (47%) were men and 55 (53%) were women.
Peripheral visual fields were not characteristically constricted. Although most eyes tested had visual acuities of 20/50 or better, 69 eyes (33%) had visual acuities of 20/100 or worse. A total of 136 eyes (66%) had senile macular degeneration at the time senile reticular pigmentary degeneration was first diagnosed, whereas only 43 control eyes (21%) from the same referral population also had senile macular degeneration (P < .001). Macular degeneration was the primary cause for reduced vision when it was noted. In no instance could reduced visual acuity or constricted visual fields be attributed to the senile reticular pigmentary degeneration alone.
Senile reticular pigmentary degeneration on routine ophthalmoscopy should alert the clinician to the possibility of co-existing macular degenerative disease.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0002-9394</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1879-1891</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/0002-9394(84)90686-X</identifier><identifier>PMID: 6507543</identifier><identifier>CODEN: AJOPAA</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York, NY: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Aged ; Aging ; Biological and medical sciences ; Female ; Fluorescein Angiography ; Fundus Oculi ; Humans ; Male ; Medical sciences ; Middle Aged ; Ophthalmology ; Pigment Epithelium of Eye - pathology ; Retinal Degeneration - diagnosis ; Retinopathies ; Visual Acuity ; Visual Fields</subject><ispartof>American journal of ophthalmology, 1984-12, Vol.98 (6), p.717-722</ispartof><rights>1984 Elsevier Inc.</rights><rights>1985 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c386t-11146dca630b671cac4ff68e7819594a172c73bac21506af2851c3c8925a0833</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c386t-11146dca630b671cac4ff68e7819594a172c73bac21506af2851c3c8925a0833</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/000293948490686X$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,27903,27904,65309</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=8952237$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/6507543$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Humphrey, William T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Carlson, Richard E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Valone, James A.</creatorcontrib><title>Senile Reticular Pigmentary Degeneration</title><title>American journal of ophthalmology</title><addtitle>Am J Ophthalmol</addtitle><description>Of 104 consecutive patients with senile reticular pigmentary degeneration (207 eyes), 85 patients (82%) were more than 60 years old (mean age, 69.2 ± 8.54 years). Forty-nine (47%) were men and 55 (53%) were women.
Peripheral visual fields were not characteristically constricted. Although most eyes tested had visual acuities of 20/50 or better, 69 eyes (33%) had visual acuities of 20/100 or worse. A total of 136 eyes (66%) had senile macular degeneration at the time senile reticular pigmentary degeneration was first diagnosed, whereas only 43 control eyes (21%) from the same referral population also had senile macular degeneration (P < .001). Macular degeneration was the primary cause for reduced vision when it was noted. In no instance could reduced visual acuity or constricted visual fields be attributed to the senile reticular pigmentary degeneration alone.
Senile reticular pigmentary degeneration on routine ophthalmoscopy should alert the clinician to the possibility of co-existing macular degenerative disease.</description><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Aging</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Fluorescein Angiography</subject><subject>Fundus Oculi</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Ophthalmology</subject><subject>Pigment Epithelium of Eye - pathology</subject><subject>Retinal Degeneration - diagnosis</subject><subject>Retinopathies</subject><subject>Visual Acuity</subject><subject>Visual Fields</subject><issn>0002-9394</issn><issn>1879-1891</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1984</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kEtLAzEUhYMotVb_gUIXInUxmkzeG0HqEwqKdtFdSDN3SmQemswI_ntn7NClq8vlfPdyzkHolOArgom4xhiniaaazRS71Fgokaz20JgoqROiNNlH4x1yiI5i_OhWIZkcoZHgWHJGx2j2DpUvYPoGjXdtYcP01W9KqBobfqZ3sIEKgm18XR2jg9wWEU6GOUHLh_vl_ClZvDw-z28XiaNKNAkhhInMWUHxWkjirGN5LhRIRTTXzBKZOknX1qWEY2HzVHHiqFM65RYrSifoYvv2M9RfLcTGlD46KApbQd1GI7nUGtMeZFvQhTrGALn5DL7sXBuCTd-P6cObPrxRzPz1Y1bd2dnwv12XkO2OhkI6_XzQbXS2yIOtnI87TGmeplR22M0Wg66Kbw_BROehcpD5AK4xWe3_9_ELSzJ_bw</recordid><startdate>19841215</startdate><enddate>19841215</enddate><creator>Humphrey, William T.</creator><creator>Carlson, Richard E.</creator><creator>Valone, James A.</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><general>Elsevier</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19841215</creationdate><title>Senile Reticular Pigmentary Degeneration</title><author>Humphrey, William T. ; Carlson, Richard E. ; Valone, James A.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c386t-11146dca630b671cac4ff68e7819594a172c73bac21506af2851c3c8925a0833</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1984</creationdate><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Aging</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Fluorescein Angiography</topic><topic>Fundus Oculi</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Ophthalmology</topic><topic>Pigment Epithelium of Eye - pathology</topic><topic>Retinal Degeneration - diagnosis</topic><topic>Retinopathies</topic><topic>Visual Acuity</topic><topic>Visual Fields</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Humphrey, William T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Carlson, Richard E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Valone, James A.</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>American journal of ophthalmology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Humphrey, William T.</au><au>Carlson, Richard E.</au><au>Valone, James A.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Senile Reticular Pigmentary Degeneration</atitle><jtitle>American journal of ophthalmology</jtitle><addtitle>Am J Ophthalmol</addtitle><date>1984-12-15</date><risdate>1984</risdate><volume>98</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>717</spage><epage>722</epage><pages>717-722</pages><issn>0002-9394</issn><eissn>1879-1891</eissn><coden>AJOPAA</coden><abstract>Of 104 consecutive patients with senile reticular pigmentary degeneration (207 eyes), 85 patients (82%) were more than 60 years old (mean age, 69.2 ± 8.54 years). Forty-nine (47%) were men and 55 (53%) were women.
Peripheral visual fields were not characteristically constricted. Although most eyes tested had visual acuities of 20/50 or better, 69 eyes (33%) had visual acuities of 20/100 or worse. A total of 136 eyes (66%) had senile macular degeneration at the time senile reticular pigmentary degeneration was first diagnosed, whereas only 43 control eyes (21%) from the same referral population also had senile macular degeneration (P < .001). Macular degeneration was the primary cause for reduced vision when it was noted. In no instance could reduced visual acuity or constricted visual fields be attributed to the senile reticular pigmentary degeneration alone.
Senile reticular pigmentary degeneration on routine ophthalmoscopy should alert the clinician to the possibility of co-existing macular degenerative disease.</abstract><cop>New York, NY</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>6507543</pmid><doi>10.1016/0002-9394(84)90686-X</doi><tpages>6</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0002-9394 |
ispartof | American journal of ophthalmology, 1984-12, Vol.98 (6), p.717-722 |
issn | 0002-9394 1879-1891 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_75799033 |
source | MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals |
subjects | Aged Aging Biological and medical sciences Female Fluorescein Angiography Fundus Oculi Humans Male Medical sciences Middle Aged Ophthalmology Pigment Epithelium of Eye - pathology Retinal Degeneration - diagnosis Retinopathies Visual Acuity Visual Fields |
title | Senile Reticular Pigmentary Degeneration |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-28T00%3A11%3A52IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Senile%20Reticular%20Pigmentary%20Degeneration&rft.jtitle=American%20journal%20of%20ophthalmology&rft.au=Humphrey,%20William%20T.&rft.date=1984-12-15&rft.volume=98&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=717&rft.epage=722&rft.pages=717-722&rft.issn=0002-9394&rft.eissn=1879-1891&rft.coden=AJOPAA&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/0002-9394(84)90686-X&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E75799033%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=75799033&rft_id=info:pmid/6507543&rft_els_id=000293948490686X&rfr_iscdi=true |