Evaluation of four commercial systems for identification of medically important yeasts

Four commercially available systems for identification of yeasts were evaluated using 178 clinical isolates and seven reference strains previously identified by a conventional method. After 72 h of incubation, the rate of correct identification was 86.5% with API20C Aux, 86% with Auxacolor, 68% with...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:

Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:	European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases 1993-04, Vol.12 (4), p.255-260
Hauptverfasser:	SCHUFFENECKER, I, FREYDIERE, A, DE MONTCLOS, H, GILLE, Y
Format:	Artikel
Sprache:	eng
Schlagworte:	Biological and medical sciences Evaluation Studies as Topic General aspects Humans Infectious diseases Medical sciences Mycology - methods Mycoses Yeasts - classification Yeasts - isolation & purification
Online-Zugang:	Volltext
Tags:	Tag hinzufügen Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!

container_end_page	260
container_issue	4
container_start_page	255
container_title	European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases
container_volume	12
creator	SCHUFFENECKER, I FREYDIERE, A DE MONTCLOS, H GILLE, Y
description	Four commercially available systems for identification of yeasts were evaluated using 178 clinical isolates and seven reference strains previously identified by a conventional method. After 72 h of incubation, the rate of correct identification was 86.5% with API20C Aux, 86% with Auxacolor, 68% with Mycotube and 51.1% with Candifast. When considering only the reference strains included in the manufacturers' databases, the identification rate was 90%, 91%, 87% and 61.2% respectively. Although the results at 72 h obtained with API20C Aux and Auxacolor were similar, Auxacolor led to more rapid identification of the strains, 67.9% versus 14.6% being identified at 24 h and 80.9% versus 64% being identified at 48 h.
doi_str_mv	10.1007/bf01967255
format	Article
fullrecord	<record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_75792726</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>75792726</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c255t-22ca7743b34b0ecbd1efa5795bef33c8d4dd117e3b0d626f349b7dd608e293f53</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo9kM1LxDAQxYMo67p68S70IB6EapJJm_aoy_oBC17Ua0nzAZG2WZNU6H9vZOuehpn34zHvIXRJ8B3BmN-3BpO65LQojtCSMChyBhyO0RLXwPKaUzhFZyF84QRXnC_QoioIVASW6HPzI7pRROuGzJnMuNFn0vW99tKKLgtTiLoP6e4zq_QQrbHyQPdapa3rpsz2O-ejGGI2aRFiOEcnRnRBX8xzhT6eNu_rl3z79vy6ftjmMj0bc0ql4JxBC6zFWraKaCMKXhetNgCyUkwpQriGFquSlgZY3XKlSlxpWoMpYIVu9r47775HHWLT2yB114lBuzE0PJlRTssE3u5B6V0IXptm520v_NQQ3PyV2Dw-_ZeY4KvZdWxTxgM6t5b061kXIeU3XgzShgPGOK7LEuAXBrt6iw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>75792726</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Evaluation of four commercial systems for identification of medically important yeasts</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings</source><creator>SCHUFFENECKER, I ; FREYDIERE, A ; DE MONTCLOS, H ; GILLE, Y</creator><creatorcontrib>SCHUFFENECKER, I ; FREYDIERE, A ; DE MONTCLOS, H ; GILLE, Y</creatorcontrib><description>Four commercially available systems for identification of yeasts were evaluated using 178 clinical isolates and seven reference strains previously identified by a conventional method. After 72 h of incubation, the rate of correct identification was 86.5% with API20C Aux, 86% with Auxacolor, 68% with Mycotube and 51.1% with Candifast. When considering only the reference strains included in the manufacturers' databases, the identification rate was 90%, 91%, 87% and 61.2% respectively. Although the results at 72 h obtained with API20C Aux and Auxacolor were similar, Auxacolor led to more rapid identification of the strains, 67.9% versus 14.6% being identified at 24 h and 80.9% versus 64% being identified at 48 h.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0934-9723</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1435-4373</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/bf01967255</identifier><identifier>PMID: 8513813</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Berlin: Springer</publisher><subject>Biological and medical sciences ; Evaluation Studies as Topic ; General aspects ; Humans ; Infectious diseases ; Medical sciences ; Mycology - methods ; Mycoses ; Yeasts - classification ; Yeasts - isolation & purification</subject><ispartof>European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases, 1993-04, Vol.12 (4), p.255-260</ispartof><rights>1993 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c255t-22ca7743b34b0ecbd1efa5795bef33c8d4dd117e3b0d626f349b7dd608e293f53</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c255t-22ca7743b34b0ecbd1efa5795bef33c8d4dd117e3b0d626f349b7dd608e293f53</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27922,27923</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=4709663$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8513813$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>SCHUFFENECKER, I</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>FREYDIERE, A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>DE MONTCLOS, H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>GILLE, Y</creatorcontrib><title>Evaluation of four commercial systems for identification of medically important yeasts</title><title>European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases</title><addtitle>Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis</addtitle><description>Four commercially available systems for identification of yeasts were evaluated using 178 clinical isolates and seven reference strains previously identified by a conventional method. After 72 h of incubation, the rate of correct identification was 86.5% with API20C Aux, 86% with Auxacolor, 68% with Mycotube and 51.1% with Candifast. When considering only the reference strains included in the manufacturers' databases, the identification rate was 90%, 91%, 87% and 61.2% respectively. Although the results at 72 h obtained with API20C Aux and Auxacolor were similar, Auxacolor led to more rapid identification of the strains, 67.9% versus 14.6% being identified at 24 h and 80.9% versus 64% being identified at 48 h.</description><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Evaluation Studies as Topic</subject><subject>General aspects</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Infectious diseases</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Mycology - methods</subject><subject>Mycoses</subject><subject>Yeasts - classification</subject><subject>Yeasts - isolation & purification</subject><issn>0934-9723</issn><issn>1435-4373</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1993</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNo9kM1LxDAQxYMo67p68S70IB6EapJJm_aoy_oBC17Ua0nzAZG2WZNU6H9vZOuehpn34zHvIXRJ8B3BmN-3BpO65LQojtCSMChyBhyO0RLXwPKaUzhFZyF84QRXnC_QoioIVASW6HPzI7pRROuGzJnMuNFn0vW99tKKLgtTiLoP6e4zq_QQrbHyQPdapa3rpsz2O-ejGGI2aRFiOEcnRnRBX8xzhT6eNu_rl3z79vy6ftjmMj0bc0ql4JxBC6zFWraKaCMKXhetNgCyUkwpQriGFquSlgZY3XKlSlxpWoMpYIVu9r47775HHWLT2yB114lBuzE0PJlRTssE3u5B6V0IXptm520v_NQQ3PyV2Dw-_ZeY4KvZdWxTxgM6t5b061kXIeU3XgzShgPGOK7LEuAXBrt6iw</recordid><startdate>199304</startdate><enddate>199304</enddate><creator>SCHUFFENECKER, I</creator><creator>FREYDIERE, A</creator><creator>DE MONTCLOS, H</creator><creator>GILLE, Y</creator><general>Springer</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>199304</creationdate><title>Evaluation of four commercial systems for identification of medically important yeasts</title><author>SCHUFFENECKER, I ; FREYDIERE, A ; DE MONTCLOS, H ; GILLE, Y</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c255t-22ca7743b34b0ecbd1efa5795bef33c8d4dd117e3b0d626f349b7dd608e293f53</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1993</creationdate><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Evaluation Studies as Topic</topic><topic>General aspects</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Infectious diseases</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Mycology - methods</topic><topic>Mycoses</topic><topic>Yeasts - classification</topic><topic>Yeasts - isolation & purification</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>SCHUFFENECKER, I</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>FREYDIERE, A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>DE MONTCLOS, H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>GILLE, Y</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>SCHUFFENECKER, I</au><au>FREYDIERE, A</au><au>DE MONTCLOS, H</au><au>GILLE, Y</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Evaluation of four commercial systems for identification of medically important yeasts</atitle><jtitle>European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases</jtitle><addtitle>Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis</addtitle><date>1993-04</date><risdate>1993</risdate><volume>12</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>255</spage><epage>260</epage><pages>255-260</pages><issn>0934-9723</issn><eissn>1435-4373</eissn><abstract>Four commercially available systems for identification of yeasts were evaluated using 178 clinical isolates and seven reference strains previously identified by a conventional method. After 72 h of incubation, the rate of correct identification was 86.5% with API20C Aux, 86% with Auxacolor, 68% with Mycotube and 51.1% with Candifast. When considering only the reference strains included in the manufacturers' databases, the identification rate was 90%, 91%, 87% and 61.2% respectively. Although the results at 72 h obtained with API20C Aux and Auxacolor were similar, Auxacolor led to more rapid identification of the strains, 67.9% versus 14.6% being identified at 24 h and 80.9% versus 64% being identified at 48 h.</abstract><cop>Berlin</cop><pub>Springer</pub><pmid>8513813</pmid><doi>10.1007/bf01967255</doi><tpages>6</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext	fulltext
identifier	ISSN: 0934-9723
ispartof	European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases, 1993-04, Vol.12 (4), p.255-260
issn	0934-9723 1435-4373
language	eng
recordid	cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_75792726
source	MEDLINE; SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings
subjects	Biological and medical sciences Evaluation Studies as Topic General aspects Humans Infectious diseases Medical sciences Mycology - methods Mycoses Yeasts - classification Yeasts - isolation & purification
title	Evaluation of four commercial systems for identification of medically important yeasts
url	https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-10T06%3A05%3A15IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Evaluation%20of%20four%20commercial%20systems%20for%20identification%20of%20medically%20important%20yeasts&rft.jtitle=European%20journal%20of%20clinical%20microbiology%20&%20infectious%20diseases&rft.au=SCHUFFENECKER,%20I&rft.date=1993-04&rft.volume=12&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=255&rft.epage=260&rft.pages=255-260&rft.issn=0934-9723&rft.eissn=1435-4373&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/bf01967255&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E75792726%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=75792726&rft_id=info:pmid/8513813&rfr_iscdi=true