Electronic Fetal Monitoring in the United States in the 1980s

OBJECTIVE:To measure the frequency with which electronic fetal monitoring was used for childbirth in United States hospitals in the 1980s and to examine variation in use according to risk factors at labor onset. METHODS:Two data sets from the National Center for Health Statistics (the 1980 National...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Obstetrics and gynecology (New York. 1953) 1993-07, Vol.82 (1), p.8-10
Hauptverfasser: ALBERS, LEAH L, KRULEWITCH, CARA J
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 10
container_issue 1
container_start_page 8
container_title Obstetrics and gynecology (New York. 1953)
container_volume 82
creator ALBERS, LEAH L
KRULEWITCH, CARA J
description OBJECTIVE:To measure the frequency with which electronic fetal monitoring was used for childbirth in United States hospitals in the 1980s and to examine variation in use according to risk factors at labor onset. METHODS:Two data sets from the National Center for Health Statistics (the 1980 National Natality Survey and the 1988 National Maternal and Infant Health Survey) were used to generate proportional frequencies for electronic fetal monitoring use. These data files are based on representative samples of live births (9941 and 9953, respectively) drawn by probability methods from the entire country during a calendar year. Consistency in the sampling methods and questionnaire procedures, and use of sampling weights, permitted national estimates to be generated. RESULTS:Use of electronic fetal monitoring increased from 44.6% of live births in 1980 to 62.2% in 1988. In both time periods, low-risk women received monitoring more frequently than did women with risk indicators. Use grew by 64% in low-risk women (from 46.5% in 1980 to 76.3% in 1988) but only by 32% in women with risk conditions at labor onset (from 42.6% in 1980 to 56.2% in 1988). CONCLUSIONS:Use of electronic fetal monitoring increased during the 1980s, disproportionately so for low-risk women. This trend raises questions about the efficacy of monitoring for improving pregnancy outcomes.
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_75790781</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>75790781</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-p2802-7ed0e4f5dd68a6e6be58cc9454c65d2789df24e969b5a00c46957097366999d43</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo9kE9Lw0AQxRdRaq1-BCEH8RbYZP_OwYOUVoWKBy14C9vdiY1uk7q7pfjtjTZ6mpn3fjx4c0TGhVYsLxl7PSZjSkvIleb8lJzF-E4pLSSwERlpUQhgxZjczDzaFLq2sdkck_HZY7-nLjTtW9a0WVpjtuwFdNlzMgnjn1iApvGcnNTGR7wY5oQs57OX6X2-eLp7mN4u8m2paZkrdBR5LZyT2kiUKxTaWuCCWylcqTS4uuQIElbCUGq5BKEoKCYlADjOJuT6kLsN3ecOY6o2TbTovWmx28VKCQVU6aIHLwdwt9qgq7ah2ZjwVQ19e_9q8E20xtfBtLaJ_xjXmsFvDD9g-84nDPHD7_YYqjUan9ZV_0YqS0HzAoBR1V_5j1Syb9lIbCo</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>75790781</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Electronic Fetal Monitoring in the United States in the 1980s</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Journals@Ovid Complete</source><creator>ALBERS, LEAH L ; KRULEWITCH, CARA J</creator><creatorcontrib>ALBERS, LEAH L ; KRULEWITCH, CARA J</creatorcontrib><description>OBJECTIVE:To measure the frequency with which electronic fetal monitoring was used for childbirth in United States hospitals in the 1980s and to examine variation in use according to risk factors at labor onset. METHODS:Two data sets from the National Center for Health Statistics (the 1980 National Natality Survey and the 1988 National Maternal and Infant Health Survey) were used to generate proportional frequencies for electronic fetal monitoring use. These data files are based on representative samples of live births (9941 and 9953, respectively) drawn by probability methods from the entire country during a calendar year. Consistency in the sampling methods and questionnaire procedures, and use of sampling weights, permitted national estimates to be generated. RESULTS:Use of electronic fetal monitoring increased from 44.6% of live births in 1980 to 62.2% in 1988. In both time periods, low-risk women received monitoring more frequently than did women with risk indicators. Use grew by 64% in low-risk women (from 46.5% in 1980 to 76.3% in 1988) but only by 32% in women with risk conditions at labor onset (from 42.6% in 1980 to 56.2% in 1988). CONCLUSIONS:Use of electronic fetal monitoring increased during the 1980s, disproportionately so for low-risk women. This trend raises questions about the efficacy of monitoring for improving pregnancy outcomes.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0029-7844</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-233X</identifier><identifier>PMID: 8515931</identifier><identifier>CODEN: OBGNAS</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York, NY: The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists</publisher><subject>Biological and medical sciences ; Delivery. Postpartum. Lactation ; Female ; Fetal Monitoring - statistics &amp; numerical data ; Fetal Monitoring - trends ; Fetal Monitoring - utilization ; Gynecology. Andrology. Obstetrics ; Humans ; Maternal, fetal and perinatal monitoring ; Medical sciences ; Pregnancy ; Pregnancy Complications ; Risk Factors ; United States</subject><ispartof>Obstetrics and gynecology (New York. 1953), 1993-07, Vol.82 (1), p.8-10</ispartof><rights>1993 The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists</rights><rights>1993 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=4883981$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8515931$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>ALBERS, LEAH L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>KRULEWITCH, CARA J</creatorcontrib><title>Electronic Fetal Monitoring in the United States in the 1980s</title><title>Obstetrics and gynecology (New York. 1953)</title><addtitle>Obstet Gynecol</addtitle><description>OBJECTIVE:To measure the frequency with which electronic fetal monitoring was used for childbirth in United States hospitals in the 1980s and to examine variation in use according to risk factors at labor onset. METHODS:Two data sets from the National Center for Health Statistics (the 1980 National Natality Survey and the 1988 National Maternal and Infant Health Survey) were used to generate proportional frequencies for electronic fetal monitoring use. These data files are based on representative samples of live births (9941 and 9953, respectively) drawn by probability methods from the entire country during a calendar year. Consistency in the sampling methods and questionnaire procedures, and use of sampling weights, permitted national estimates to be generated. RESULTS:Use of electronic fetal monitoring increased from 44.6% of live births in 1980 to 62.2% in 1988. In both time periods, low-risk women received monitoring more frequently than did women with risk indicators. Use grew by 64% in low-risk women (from 46.5% in 1980 to 76.3% in 1988) but only by 32% in women with risk conditions at labor onset (from 42.6% in 1980 to 56.2% in 1988). CONCLUSIONS:Use of electronic fetal monitoring increased during the 1980s, disproportionately so for low-risk women. This trend raises questions about the efficacy of monitoring for improving pregnancy outcomes.</description><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Delivery. Postpartum. Lactation</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Fetal Monitoring - statistics &amp; numerical data</subject><subject>Fetal Monitoring - trends</subject><subject>Fetal Monitoring - utilization</subject><subject>Gynecology. Andrology. Obstetrics</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Maternal, fetal and perinatal monitoring</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Pregnancy</subject><subject>Pregnancy Complications</subject><subject>Risk Factors</subject><subject>United States</subject><issn>0029-7844</issn><issn>1873-233X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1993</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNo9kE9Lw0AQxRdRaq1-BCEH8RbYZP_OwYOUVoWKBy14C9vdiY1uk7q7pfjtjTZ6mpn3fjx4c0TGhVYsLxl7PSZjSkvIleb8lJzF-E4pLSSwERlpUQhgxZjczDzaFLq2sdkck_HZY7-nLjTtW9a0WVpjtuwFdNlzMgnjn1iApvGcnNTGR7wY5oQs57OX6X2-eLp7mN4u8m2paZkrdBR5LZyT2kiUKxTaWuCCWylcqTS4uuQIElbCUGq5BKEoKCYlADjOJuT6kLsN3ecOY6o2TbTovWmx28VKCQVU6aIHLwdwt9qgq7ah2ZjwVQ19e_9q8E20xtfBtLaJ_xjXmsFvDD9g-84nDPHD7_YYqjUan9ZV_0YqS0HzAoBR1V_5j1Syb9lIbCo</recordid><startdate>199307</startdate><enddate>199307</enddate><creator>ALBERS, LEAH L</creator><creator>KRULEWITCH, CARA J</creator><general>The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists</general><general>Elsevier Science</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>199307</creationdate><title>Electronic Fetal Monitoring in the United States in the 1980s</title><author>ALBERS, LEAH L ; KRULEWITCH, CARA J</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-p2802-7ed0e4f5dd68a6e6be58cc9454c65d2789df24e969b5a00c46957097366999d43</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1993</creationdate><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Delivery. Postpartum. Lactation</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Fetal Monitoring - statistics &amp; numerical data</topic><topic>Fetal Monitoring - trends</topic><topic>Fetal Monitoring - utilization</topic><topic>Gynecology. Andrology. Obstetrics</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Maternal, fetal and perinatal monitoring</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Pregnancy</topic><topic>Pregnancy Complications</topic><topic>Risk Factors</topic><topic>United States</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>ALBERS, LEAH L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>KRULEWITCH, CARA J</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Obstetrics and gynecology (New York. 1953)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>ALBERS, LEAH L</au><au>KRULEWITCH, CARA J</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Electronic Fetal Monitoring in the United States in the 1980s</atitle><jtitle>Obstetrics and gynecology (New York. 1953)</jtitle><addtitle>Obstet Gynecol</addtitle><date>1993-07</date><risdate>1993</risdate><volume>82</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>8</spage><epage>10</epage><pages>8-10</pages><issn>0029-7844</issn><eissn>1873-233X</eissn><coden>OBGNAS</coden><abstract>OBJECTIVE:To measure the frequency with which electronic fetal monitoring was used for childbirth in United States hospitals in the 1980s and to examine variation in use according to risk factors at labor onset. METHODS:Two data sets from the National Center for Health Statistics (the 1980 National Natality Survey and the 1988 National Maternal and Infant Health Survey) were used to generate proportional frequencies for electronic fetal monitoring use. These data files are based on representative samples of live births (9941 and 9953, respectively) drawn by probability methods from the entire country during a calendar year. Consistency in the sampling methods and questionnaire procedures, and use of sampling weights, permitted national estimates to be generated. RESULTS:Use of electronic fetal monitoring increased from 44.6% of live births in 1980 to 62.2% in 1988. In both time periods, low-risk women received monitoring more frequently than did women with risk indicators. Use grew by 64% in low-risk women (from 46.5% in 1980 to 76.3% in 1988) but only by 32% in women with risk conditions at labor onset (from 42.6% in 1980 to 56.2% in 1988). CONCLUSIONS:Use of electronic fetal monitoring increased during the 1980s, disproportionately so for low-risk women. This trend raises questions about the efficacy of monitoring for improving pregnancy outcomes.</abstract><cop>New York, NY</cop><pub>The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists</pub><pmid>8515931</pmid><tpages>3</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0029-7844
ispartof Obstetrics and gynecology (New York. 1953), 1993-07, Vol.82 (1), p.8-10
issn 0029-7844
1873-233X
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_75790781
source MEDLINE; Journals@Ovid Complete
subjects Biological and medical sciences
Delivery. Postpartum. Lactation
Female
Fetal Monitoring - statistics & numerical data
Fetal Monitoring - trends
Fetal Monitoring - utilization
Gynecology. Andrology. Obstetrics
Humans
Maternal, fetal and perinatal monitoring
Medical sciences
Pregnancy
Pregnancy Complications
Risk Factors
United States
title Electronic Fetal Monitoring in the United States in the 1980s
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-24T06%3A11%3A58IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Electronic%20Fetal%20Monitoring%20in%20the%20United%20States%20in%20the%201980s&rft.jtitle=Obstetrics%20and%20gynecology%20(New%20York.%201953)&rft.au=ALBERS,%20LEAH%20L&rft.date=1993-07&rft.volume=82&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=8&rft.epage=10&rft.pages=8-10&rft.issn=0029-7844&rft.eissn=1873-233X&rft.coden=OBGNAS&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E75790781%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=75790781&rft_id=info:pmid/8515931&rfr_iscdi=true