Comparison of low concentrations of halothane and isoflurane as bronchodilators
Although high concentrations of all currently used inhalational anesthetics are thought to be good bronchodilators, studies using traditional measures of airway tone fail to show differences in airway responsiveness during halothane, enflurane, and isoflurane use. Using a more sensitive technique, t...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Anesthesiology (Philadelphia) 1993-06, Vol.78 (6), p.1097-1101 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 1101 |
---|---|
container_issue | 6 |
container_start_page | 1097 |
container_title | Anesthesiology (Philadelphia) |
container_volume | 78 |
creator | BROWN, R. H ZERHOUNI, E. A HIRSHMAN, C. A |
description | Although high concentrations of all currently used inhalational anesthetics are thought to be good bronchodilators, studies using traditional measures of airway tone fail to show differences in airway responsiveness during halothane, enflurane, and isoflurane use. Using a more sensitive technique, the authors compared the ability of halothane and isoflurane to dilate histamine-constricted airways at equivalent MAC concentrations.
Responses of histamine-constricted individual airways to increasing doses of halothane and isoflurane were directly measured using high-resolution computed tomography (HRCT). Fifteen studies were performed in five dogs. All dogs were initially anesthetized with thiopental 15 mg/kg followed by a 10-mg.kg-1 x h-1 maintenance dose. Following tracheal intubation, the lungs were mechanically ventilated (15 ml/kg, 15 bpm). The airways were constricted with intravenous histamine 200 micrograms/min. On alternate days, the dogs subsequently received increasing concentrations of either halothane or isoflurane (0.6, 1.1, and 1.7 MAC). On a separate day, the dogs received atropine 0.2 mg/kg after the histamine infusion and the study was repeated.
Histamine decreased airway area 34 +/- 2.5% (mean +/- SEM). All preconstricted airways showed a significant dose-dependent dilation to halothane and isoflurane at concentrations of 0.6, 1.1, and 1.7 MAC. Halothane significantly dilated airways to a greater extent than isoflurane at 0.6 and 1.1 MAC (P < 0.001). This effect was most pronounced in airways less than 3 mm in diameter. At 1.7 MAC, there was no significant difference between the two agents (P = 0.42). Atropine (0.2 mg/kg) reversed the airway constriction elicited by intravenous histamine. The histamine-preconstricted airways area increased 370 +/- 34% (P < 0.0001) after atropine.
Halothane and isoflurane dilate histamine-constricted airways in a dose-dependent manner. However, at low concentrations, halothane was a more effective bronchodilator than isoflurane at equivalent MAC doses. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1097/00000542-199306000-00012 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_75778249</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>75778249</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c389t-62e9b69612566f894a035c3f322f1dc0f5add089400cd80b20bf070f84332c973</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo9kF1LBCEUhiWKbdv6CcFcRHdTRx1HvYylL1jYm7oWx1F2whk3nSH697kfrSDyvuc958iDUIHhAYPkj7A7rCIllpJCnUWZLyZnaI4ZESXGnJ2jefZoSYGQS3SV0leWnFExQzPBMMFA52i9DP1Wxy6FoQiu8OGnMGEwdhijHrswpJ270T6MGz3YQg9tkbPOT3EvU9HEHN-EtvN6DDFdowunfbI3x3eBPl-eP5Zv5Wr9-r58WpWGCjmWNbGyqWWNCatrJ2SlgTJDHSXE4daAY7ptIfsAphXQEGgccHCiopQYyekC3R_mbmP4nmwaVd8lY73P3wpTUpxxLkglc1AcgiaGlKJ1ahu7XsdfhUHtWKp_lurEUu1Z5tbb446p6W17ajzCy_W7Y10no73LSEyXTrGKc5YH0j_CbXt_</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>75778249</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comparison of low concentrations of halothane and isoflurane as bronchodilators</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>Journals@Ovid Complete</source><creator>BROWN, R. H ; ZERHOUNI, E. A ; HIRSHMAN, C. A</creator><creatorcontrib>BROWN, R. H ; ZERHOUNI, E. A ; HIRSHMAN, C. A</creatorcontrib><description>Although high concentrations of all currently used inhalational anesthetics are thought to be good bronchodilators, studies using traditional measures of airway tone fail to show differences in airway responsiveness during halothane, enflurane, and isoflurane use. Using a more sensitive technique, the authors compared the ability of halothane and isoflurane to dilate histamine-constricted airways at equivalent MAC concentrations.
Responses of histamine-constricted individual airways to increasing doses of halothane and isoflurane were directly measured using high-resolution computed tomography (HRCT). Fifteen studies were performed in five dogs. All dogs were initially anesthetized with thiopental 15 mg/kg followed by a 10-mg.kg-1 x h-1 maintenance dose. Following tracheal intubation, the lungs were mechanically ventilated (15 ml/kg, 15 bpm). The airways were constricted with intravenous histamine 200 micrograms/min. On alternate days, the dogs subsequently received increasing concentrations of either halothane or isoflurane (0.6, 1.1, and 1.7 MAC). On a separate day, the dogs received atropine 0.2 mg/kg after the histamine infusion and the study was repeated.
Histamine decreased airway area 34 +/- 2.5% (mean +/- SEM). All preconstricted airways showed a significant dose-dependent dilation to halothane and isoflurane at concentrations of 0.6, 1.1, and 1.7 MAC. Halothane significantly dilated airways to a greater extent than isoflurane at 0.6 and 1.1 MAC (P < 0.001). This effect was most pronounced in airways less than 3 mm in diameter. At 1.7 MAC, there was no significant difference between the two agents (P = 0.42). Atropine (0.2 mg/kg) reversed the airway constriction elicited by intravenous histamine. The histamine-preconstricted airways area increased 370 +/- 34% (P < 0.0001) after atropine.
Halothane and isoflurane dilate histamine-constricted airways in a dose-dependent manner. However, at low concentrations, halothane was a more effective bronchodilator than isoflurane at equivalent MAC doses.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0003-3022</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1528-1175</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1097/00000542-199306000-00012</identifier><identifier>PMID: 8512103</identifier><identifier>CODEN: ANESAV</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Hagerstown, MD: Lippincott</publisher><subject>Anesthetics. Neuromuscular blocking agents ; Animals ; Biological and medical sciences ; Bronchi - drug effects ; Bronchoconstrictor Agents - pharmacology ; Bronchodilator Agents - administration & dosage ; Bronchodilator Agents - pharmacology ; Dogs ; Halothane - administration & dosage ; Halothane - pharmacology ; Histamine - pharmacology ; Isoflurane - administration & dosage ; Isoflurane - pharmacology ; Medical sciences ; Neuropharmacology ; Pharmacology. Drug treatments</subject><ispartof>Anesthesiology (Philadelphia), 1993-06, Vol.78 (6), p.1097-1101</ispartof><rights>1993 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c389t-62e9b69612566f894a035c3f322f1dc0f5add089400cd80b20bf070f84332c973</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=4775930$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8512103$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>BROWN, R. H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>ZERHOUNI, E. A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>HIRSHMAN, C. A</creatorcontrib><title>Comparison of low concentrations of halothane and isoflurane as bronchodilators</title><title>Anesthesiology (Philadelphia)</title><addtitle>Anesthesiology</addtitle><description>Although high concentrations of all currently used inhalational anesthetics are thought to be good bronchodilators, studies using traditional measures of airway tone fail to show differences in airway responsiveness during halothane, enflurane, and isoflurane use. Using a more sensitive technique, the authors compared the ability of halothane and isoflurane to dilate histamine-constricted airways at equivalent MAC concentrations.
Responses of histamine-constricted individual airways to increasing doses of halothane and isoflurane were directly measured using high-resolution computed tomography (HRCT). Fifteen studies were performed in five dogs. All dogs were initially anesthetized with thiopental 15 mg/kg followed by a 10-mg.kg-1 x h-1 maintenance dose. Following tracheal intubation, the lungs were mechanically ventilated (15 ml/kg, 15 bpm). The airways were constricted with intravenous histamine 200 micrograms/min. On alternate days, the dogs subsequently received increasing concentrations of either halothane or isoflurane (0.6, 1.1, and 1.7 MAC). On a separate day, the dogs received atropine 0.2 mg/kg after the histamine infusion and the study was repeated.
Histamine decreased airway area 34 +/- 2.5% (mean +/- SEM). All preconstricted airways showed a significant dose-dependent dilation to halothane and isoflurane at concentrations of 0.6, 1.1, and 1.7 MAC. Halothane significantly dilated airways to a greater extent than isoflurane at 0.6 and 1.1 MAC (P < 0.001). This effect was most pronounced in airways less than 3 mm in diameter. At 1.7 MAC, there was no significant difference between the two agents (P = 0.42). Atropine (0.2 mg/kg) reversed the airway constriction elicited by intravenous histamine. The histamine-preconstricted airways area increased 370 +/- 34% (P < 0.0001) after atropine.
Halothane and isoflurane dilate histamine-constricted airways in a dose-dependent manner. However, at low concentrations, halothane was a more effective bronchodilator than isoflurane at equivalent MAC doses.</description><subject>Anesthetics. Neuromuscular blocking agents</subject><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Bronchi - drug effects</subject><subject>Bronchoconstrictor Agents - pharmacology</subject><subject>Bronchodilator Agents - administration & dosage</subject><subject>Bronchodilator Agents - pharmacology</subject><subject>Dogs</subject><subject>Halothane - administration & dosage</subject><subject>Halothane - pharmacology</subject><subject>Histamine - pharmacology</subject><subject>Isoflurane - administration & dosage</subject><subject>Isoflurane - pharmacology</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Neuropharmacology</subject><subject>Pharmacology. Drug treatments</subject><issn>0003-3022</issn><issn>1528-1175</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1993</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNo9kF1LBCEUhiWKbdv6CcFcRHdTRx1HvYylL1jYm7oWx1F2whk3nSH697kfrSDyvuc958iDUIHhAYPkj7A7rCIllpJCnUWZLyZnaI4ZESXGnJ2jefZoSYGQS3SV0leWnFExQzPBMMFA52i9DP1Wxy6FoQiu8OGnMGEwdhijHrswpJ270T6MGz3YQg9tkbPOT3EvU9HEHN-EtvN6DDFdowunfbI3x3eBPl-eP5Zv5Wr9-r58WpWGCjmWNbGyqWWNCatrJ2SlgTJDHSXE4daAY7ptIfsAphXQEGgccHCiopQYyekC3R_mbmP4nmwaVd8lY73P3wpTUpxxLkglc1AcgiaGlKJ1ahu7XsdfhUHtWKp_lurEUu1Z5tbb446p6W17ajzCy_W7Y10no73LSEyXTrGKc5YH0j_CbXt_</recordid><startdate>19930601</startdate><enddate>19930601</enddate><creator>BROWN, R. H</creator><creator>ZERHOUNI, E. A</creator><creator>HIRSHMAN, C. A</creator><general>Lippincott</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19930601</creationdate><title>Comparison of low concentrations of halothane and isoflurane as bronchodilators</title><author>BROWN, R. H ; ZERHOUNI, E. A ; HIRSHMAN, C. A</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c389t-62e9b69612566f894a035c3f322f1dc0f5add089400cd80b20bf070f84332c973</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1993</creationdate><topic>Anesthetics. Neuromuscular blocking agents</topic><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Bronchi - drug effects</topic><topic>Bronchoconstrictor Agents - pharmacology</topic><topic>Bronchodilator Agents - administration & dosage</topic><topic>Bronchodilator Agents - pharmacology</topic><topic>Dogs</topic><topic>Halothane - administration & dosage</topic><topic>Halothane - pharmacology</topic><topic>Histamine - pharmacology</topic><topic>Isoflurane - administration & dosage</topic><topic>Isoflurane - pharmacology</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Neuropharmacology</topic><topic>Pharmacology. Drug treatments</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>BROWN, R. H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>ZERHOUNI, E. A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>HIRSHMAN, C. A</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Anesthesiology (Philadelphia)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>BROWN, R. H</au><au>ZERHOUNI, E. A</au><au>HIRSHMAN, C. A</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Comparison of low concentrations of halothane and isoflurane as bronchodilators</atitle><jtitle>Anesthesiology (Philadelphia)</jtitle><addtitle>Anesthesiology</addtitle><date>1993-06-01</date><risdate>1993</risdate><volume>78</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>1097</spage><epage>1101</epage><pages>1097-1101</pages><issn>0003-3022</issn><eissn>1528-1175</eissn><coden>ANESAV</coden><abstract>Although high concentrations of all currently used inhalational anesthetics are thought to be good bronchodilators, studies using traditional measures of airway tone fail to show differences in airway responsiveness during halothane, enflurane, and isoflurane use. Using a more sensitive technique, the authors compared the ability of halothane and isoflurane to dilate histamine-constricted airways at equivalent MAC concentrations.
Responses of histamine-constricted individual airways to increasing doses of halothane and isoflurane were directly measured using high-resolution computed tomography (HRCT). Fifteen studies were performed in five dogs. All dogs were initially anesthetized with thiopental 15 mg/kg followed by a 10-mg.kg-1 x h-1 maintenance dose. Following tracheal intubation, the lungs were mechanically ventilated (15 ml/kg, 15 bpm). The airways were constricted with intravenous histamine 200 micrograms/min. On alternate days, the dogs subsequently received increasing concentrations of either halothane or isoflurane (0.6, 1.1, and 1.7 MAC). On a separate day, the dogs received atropine 0.2 mg/kg after the histamine infusion and the study was repeated.
Histamine decreased airway area 34 +/- 2.5% (mean +/- SEM). All preconstricted airways showed a significant dose-dependent dilation to halothane and isoflurane at concentrations of 0.6, 1.1, and 1.7 MAC. Halothane significantly dilated airways to a greater extent than isoflurane at 0.6 and 1.1 MAC (P < 0.001). This effect was most pronounced in airways less than 3 mm in diameter. At 1.7 MAC, there was no significant difference between the two agents (P = 0.42). Atropine (0.2 mg/kg) reversed the airway constriction elicited by intravenous histamine. The histamine-preconstricted airways area increased 370 +/- 34% (P < 0.0001) after atropine.
Halothane and isoflurane dilate histamine-constricted airways in a dose-dependent manner. However, at low concentrations, halothane was a more effective bronchodilator than isoflurane at equivalent MAC doses.</abstract><cop>Hagerstown, MD</cop><pub>Lippincott</pub><pmid>8512103</pmid><doi>10.1097/00000542-199306000-00012</doi><tpages>5</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0003-3022 |
ispartof | Anesthesiology (Philadelphia), 1993-06, Vol.78 (6), p.1097-1101 |
issn | 0003-3022 1528-1175 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_75778249 |
source | MEDLINE; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; Journals@Ovid Complete |
subjects | Anesthetics. Neuromuscular blocking agents Animals Biological and medical sciences Bronchi - drug effects Bronchoconstrictor Agents - pharmacology Bronchodilator Agents - administration & dosage Bronchodilator Agents - pharmacology Dogs Halothane - administration & dosage Halothane - pharmacology Histamine - pharmacology Isoflurane - administration & dosage Isoflurane - pharmacology Medical sciences Neuropharmacology Pharmacology. Drug treatments |
title | Comparison of low concentrations of halothane and isoflurane as bronchodilators |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-05T11%3A17%3A48IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparison%20of%20low%20concentrations%20of%20halothane%20and%20isoflurane%20as%20bronchodilators&rft.jtitle=Anesthesiology%20(Philadelphia)&rft.au=BROWN,%20R.%20H&rft.date=1993-06-01&rft.volume=78&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=1097&rft.epage=1101&rft.pages=1097-1101&rft.issn=0003-3022&rft.eissn=1528-1175&rft.coden=ANESAV&rft_id=info:doi/10.1097/00000542-199306000-00012&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E75778249%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=75778249&rft_id=info:pmid/8512103&rfr_iscdi=true |