Metacomprehension of text material
Two experiments investigated Ss' ability to predict future multiple-choice test performance after reading sections of text. In Exp I, 30 undergraduates who scored above median test performance showed some accuracy in their predictions of that test performance. They gave higher mean ratings to m...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition memory, and cognition, 1984-10, Vol.10 (4), p.663-679 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 679 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 4 |
| container_start_page | 663 |
| container_title | Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition |
| container_volume | 10 |
| creator | Maki, Ruth H Berry, Sharon L |
| description | Two experiments investigated Ss' ability to predict future multiple-choice test performance after reading sections of text. In Exp I, 30 undergraduates who scored above median test performance showed some accuracy in their predictions of that test performance. They gave higher mean ratings to material related to correct than to incorrect test answers. Ss who scored below median test performance did not show this prediction accuracy. The retention interval between reading and the test was manipulated in Exp II, in which 46 undergraduates who were tested after at least a 24-hr delay showed results identical to those of Ss in Exp I. However, when Ss were tested immediately after reading, Ss above and below median test performance gave accurate predictions for the 1st immediate test. In contrast, both types of Ss gave inaccurate predictions for the 2nd immediate test. Structural variables such as length, serial position, and hierarchical level of the sections of text were related to Ss' predictions. (20 ref) |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1037/0278-7393.10.4.663 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_75773083</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1839875981</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a398t-c8c499b0da6b06475bd05e7de7eb3ef902b055c157f49a682af1d11b030d7e1f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp10FtLwzAUB_AgypzTLyAIQ4cv0pk0ze1RhjeY-KLPIU1PsaM3kxa2b2_KxlDRvITk_HJy-CN0TvCcYCpucSxkJKii4ThP5pzTAzQmiqqIxJIdovEeHKMT71d4WFSO0IjHVGHMx-jyBTpjm6p18AG1L5p62uTTDtbdtDIduMKUp-goN6WHs90-Qe8P92-Lp2j5-vi8uFtGhirZRVbaRKkUZ4anmCeCpRlmIDIQkFLIFY5TzJglTOSJMlzGJicZISmmOBNAcjpB19u-rWs-e_CdrgpvoSxNDU3vtWBCUCxpgJe_4KrpXR1m05wksZKYJAFd_YeIDAMLpiQJKt4q6xrvHeS6dUVl3EYTrIeM9RChHiIcbhIdMg6PLnat-7SCbP9kF2qoz3Z1460pc2dqW_g9k4qTmIvAbrbMtEa3fmON6wpbgre9c1B3el1W3z-d_a1_si85h50h</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>614298014</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Metacomprehension of text material</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>EBSCOhost APA PsycARTICLES</source><source>Periodicals Index Online</source><creator>Maki, Ruth H ; Berry, Sharon L</creator><contributor>Shiffrin, Richard M</contributor><creatorcontrib>Maki, Ruth H ; Berry, Sharon L ; Shiffrin, Richard M</creatorcontrib><description>Two experiments investigated Ss' ability to predict future multiple-choice test performance after reading sections of text. In Exp I, 30 undergraduates who scored above median test performance showed some accuracy in their predictions of that test performance. They gave higher mean ratings to material related to correct than to incorrect test answers. Ss who scored below median test performance did not show this prediction accuracy. The retention interval between reading and the test was manipulated in Exp II, in which 46 undergraduates who were tested after at least a 24-hr delay showed results identical to those of Ss in Exp I. However, when Ss were tested immediately after reading, Ss above and below median test performance gave accurate predictions for the 1st immediate test. In contrast, both types of Ss gave inaccurate predictions for the 2nd immediate test. Structural variables such as length, serial position, and hierarchical level of the sections of text were related to Ss' predictions. (20 ref)</description><identifier>ISSN: 0278-7393</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1939-1285</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1037/0278-7393.10.4.663</identifier><identifier>PMID: 6239006</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Washington, DC: American Psychological Association</publisher><subject>Achievement ; Attention ; Biological and medical sciences ; College Students ; Concept Formation ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; Human ; Humans ; Language ; Memory ; Mental Recall ; Prediction ; Production and perception of written language ; Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry ; Psychology. Psychophysiology ; Reading ; Reading Comprehension ; Retention (Psychology) ; Self-Perception ; Set (Psychology) ; Test Performance ; Test Scores</subject><ispartof>Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition, 1984-10, Vol.10 (4), p.663-679</ispartof><rights>1984 American Psychological Association</rights><rights>1985 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>1984, American Psychological Association</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27869,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=8961267$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/6239006$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><contributor>Shiffrin, Richard M</contributor><creatorcontrib>Maki, Ruth H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Berry, Sharon L</creatorcontrib><title>Metacomprehension of text material</title><title>Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition</title><addtitle>J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn</addtitle><description>Two experiments investigated Ss' ability to predict future multiple-choice test performance after reading sections of text. In Exp I, 30 undergraduates who scored above median test performance showed some accuracy in their predictions of that test performance. They gave higher mean ratings to material related to correct than to incorrect test answers. Ss who scored below median test performance did not show this prediction accuracy. The retention interval between reading and the test was manipulated in Exp II, in which 46 undergraduates who were tested after at least a 24-hr delay showed results identical to those of Ss in Exp I. However, when Ss were tested immediately after reading, Ss above and below median test performance gave accurate predictions for the 1st immediate test. In contrast, both types of Ss gave inaccurate predictions for the 2nd immediate test. Structural variables such as length, serial position, and hierarchical level of the sections of text were related to Ss' predictions. (20 ref)</description><subject>Achievement</subject><subject>Attention</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>College Students</subject><subject>Concept Formation</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>Human</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Language</subject><subject>Memory</subject><subject>Mental Recall</subject><subject>Prediction</subject><subject>Production and perception of written language</subject><subject>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</subject><subject>Psychology. Psychophysiology</subject><subject>Reading</subject><subject>Reading Comprehension</subject><subject>Retention (Psychology)</subject><subject>Self-Perception</subject><subject>Set (Psychology)</subject><subject>Test Performance</subject><subject>Test Scores</subject><issn>0278-7393</issn><issn>1939-1285</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1984</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>K30</sourceid><recordid>eNp10FtLwzAUB_AgypzTLyAIQ4cv0pk0ze1RhjeY-KLPIU1PsaM3kxa2b2_KxlDRvITk_HJy-CN0TvCcYCpucSxkJKii4ThP5pzTAzQmiqqIxJIdovEeHKMT71d4WFSO0IjHVGHMx-jyBTpjm6p18AG1L5p62uTTDtbdtDIduMKUp-goN6WHs90-Qe8P92-Lp2j5-vi8uFtGhirZRVbaRKkUZ4anmCeCpRlmIDIQkFLIFY5TzJglTOSJMlzGJicZISmmOBNAcjpB19u-rWs-e_CdrgpvoSxNDU3vtWBCUCxpgJe_4KrpXR1m05wksZKYJAFd_YeIDAMLpiQJKt4q6xrvHeS6dUVl3EYTrIeM9RChHiIcbhIdMg6PLnat-7SCbP9kF2qoz3Z1460pc2dqW_g9k4qTmIvAbrbMtEa3fmON6wpbgre9c1B3el1W3z-d_a1_si85h50h</recordid><startdate>198410</startdate><enddate>198410</enddate><creator>Maki, Ruth H</creator><creator>Berry, Sharon L</creator><general>American Psychological Association</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7WH</scope><scope>K30</scope><scope>PAAUG</scope><scope>PAWHS</scope><scope>PAWZZ</scope><scope>PAXOH</scope><scope>PBHAV</scope><scope>PBQSW</scope><scope>PBYQZ</scope><scope>PCIWU</scope><scope>PCMID</scope><scope>PCZJX</scope><scope>PDGRG</scope><scope>PDWWI</scope><scope>PETMR</scope><scope>PFVGT</scope><scope>PGXDX</scope><scope>PIHIL</scope><scope>PISVA</scope><scope>PJCTQ</scope><scope>PJTMS</scope><scope>PLCHJ</scope><scope>PMHAD</scope><scope>PNQDJ</scope><scope>POUND</scope><scope>PPLAD</scope><scope>PQAPC</scope><scope>PQCAN</scope><scope>PQCMW</scope><scope>PQEME</scope><scope>PQHKH</scope><scope>PQMID</scope><scope>PQNCT</scope><scope>PQNET</scope><scope>PQSCT</scope><scope>PQSET</scope><scope>PSVJG</scope><scope>PVMQY</scope><scope>PZGFC</scope><scope>7RZ</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>198410</creationdate><title>Metacomprehension of text material</title><author>Maki, Ruth H ; Berry, Sharon L</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a398t-c8c499b0da6b06475bd05e7de7eb3ef902b055c157f49a682af1d11b030d7e1f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1984</creationdate><topic>Achievement</topic><topic>Attention</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>College Students</topic><topic>Concept Formation</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>Human</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Language</topic><topic>Memory</topic><topic>Mental Recall</topic><topic>Prediction</topic><topic>Production and perception of written language</topic><topic>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</topic><topic>Psychology. Psychophysiology</topic><topic>Reading</topic><topic>Reading Comprehension</topic><topic>Retention (Psychology)</topic><topic>Self-Perception</topic><topic>Set (Psychology)</topic><topic>Test Performance</topic><topic>Test Scores</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Maki, Ruth H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Berry, Sharon L</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 50</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - West</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - MEA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - West</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segments 1-50</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - MEA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - West</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - MEA</collection><collection>APA PsycArticles®</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Maki, Ruth H</au><au>Berry, Sharon L</au><au>Shiffrin, Richard M</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Metacomprehension of text material</atitle><jtitle>Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition</jtitle><addtitle>J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn</addtitle><date>1984-10</date><risdate>1984</risdate><volume>10</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>663</spage><epage>679</epage><pages>663-679</pages><issn>0278-7393</issn><eissn>1939-1285</eissn><abstract>Two experiments investigated Ss' ability to predict future multiple-choice test performance after reading sections of text. In Exp I, 30 undergraduates who scored above median test performance showed some accuracy in their predictions of that test performance. They gave higher mean ratings to material related to correct than to incorrect test answers. Ss who scored below median test performance did not show this prediction accuracy. The retention interval between reading and the test was manipulated in Exp II, in which 46 undergraduates who were tested after at least a 24-hr delay showed results identical to those of Ss in Exp I. However, when Ss were tested immediately after reading, Ss above and below median test performance gave accurate predictions for the 1st immediate test. In contrast, both types of Ss gave inaccurate predictions for the 2nd immediate test. Structural variables such as length, serial position, and hierarchical level of the sections of text were related to Ss' predictions. (20 ref)</abstract><cop>Washington, DC</cop><pub>American Psychological Association</pub><pmid>6239006</pmid><doi>10.1037/0278-7393.10.4.663</doi><tpages>17</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0278-7393 |
| ispartof | Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition, 1984-10, Vol.10 (4), p.663-679 |
| issn | 0278-7393 1939-1285 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_75773083 |
| source | MEDLINE; EBSCOhost APA PsycARTICLES; Periodicals Index Online |
| subjects | Achievement Attention Biological and medical sciences College Students Concept Formation Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology Human Humans Language Memory Mental Recall Prediction Production and perception of written language Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry Psychology. Psychophysiology Reading Reading Comprehension Retention (Psychology) Self-Perception Set (Psychology) Test Performance Test Scores |
| title | Metacomprehension of text material |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-26T18%3A24%3A59IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Metacomprehension%20of%20text%20material&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20experimental%20psychology.%20Learning,%20memory,%20and%20cognition&rft.au=Maki,%20Ruth%20H&rft.date=1984-10&rft.volume=10&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=663&rft.epage=679&rft.pages=663-679&rft.issn=0278-7393&rft.eissn=1939-1285&rft_id=info:doi/10.1037/0278-7393.10.4.663&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1839875981%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=614298014&rft_id=info:pmid/6239006&rfr_iscdi=true |