COMPARISON OF PULSE OXIMETERS: EFFECTS OF VASOCONSTRICTION AND VENOUS ENGORGEMENT

The effects of cold-induced vasoconstriction and venous occlusion on the detection of induced hypoxaemia by four pulse oximeters were examined in 10 volunteers. In three further subjects vasoconstriction was maintained until at least one instrument failed to detect the induced hypoxaemia. Time taken...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:British journal of anaesthesia : BJA 1989-04, Vol.62 (4), p.439-444
Hauptverfasser: WILKINS, C.J., MOORES, M., HANNING, C.D.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 444
container_issue 4
container_start_page 439
container_title British journal of anaesthesia : BJA
container_volume 62
creator WILKINS, C.J.
MOORES, M.
HANNING, C.D.
description The effects of cold-induced vasoconstriction and venous occlusion on the detection of induced hypoxaemia by four pulse oximeters were examined in 10 volunteers. In three further subjects vasoconstriction was maintained until at least one instrument failed to detect the induced hypoxaemia. Time taken to detect hypoxaemia was increased for all instruments to between two and three times the instrument's own control value for both vasoconstriction and venous engorgement (P
doi_str_mv 10.1093/bja/62.4.439
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_75766743</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0007091217473843</els_id><sourcerecordid>75766743</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c438t-d9d27b4fa4926348ab1b59e804dba4d7fea0e9ab6c92d6a2cf2141139919118b3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNptkM9v0zAUgC0EGmVw44qUA9qJdH6Oa8fcquB2EW08mnSqdrEcx5Ey-mPY7TT-e1K16onTO3yf3nv6EPoMeAhYJLf1k7llZEiHNBFv0AAoh5hxDm_RAGPMYyyAvEcfQnjCGDgRoyt0RThmkJIB-pWp-f14kZeqiNQkul_OShmpVT6XlVyU3yM5mcisKo_sYVyqTBVltcizKu_9cfEjepCFWpaRLKZqMZVzWVQf0bvWrIP7dJ7XaDmRVXYXz9Q0z8az2NIk3ceNaAivaWuoICyhqamhHgmXYtrUhja8dQY7YWpmBWmYIbYlQAESIUAApHVyjW5Oe5_97s_Bhb3edMG69dps3e4QNB9xxjhNevHbSbR-F4J3rX723cb4vxqwPhbUfUHNiKa6L9jrX857D_XGNRf5nKznX8_cBGvWrTdb24WLxqFvz45afNK6sHevF2z8b814wkf6bvWoZ4_8J12tiD6eZSff9c1eOud1sJ3bWtd03tm9bnbd___9BxDkkxM</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>75766743</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>COMPARISON OF PULSE OXIMETERS: EFFECTS OF VASOCONSTRICTION AND VENOUS ENGORGEMENT</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Oxford Journals A-Z Collection</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><source>EZB Electronic Journals Library</source><creator>WILKINS, C.J. ; MOORES, M. ; HANNING, C.D.</creator><creatorcontrib>WILKINS, C.J. ; MOORES, M. ; HANNING, C.D.</creatorcontrib><description>The effects of cold-induced vasoconstriction and venous occlusion on the detection of induced hypoxaemia by four pulse oximeters were examined in 10 volunteers. In three further subjects vasoconstriction was maintained until at least one instrument failed to detect the induced hypoxaemia. Time taken to detect hypoxaemia was increased for all instruments to between two and three times the instrument's own control value for both vasoconstriction and venous engorgement (P&lt;0.01). There was highly significant variation in detected minimum saturation between the instruments (P&lt;0.001). One instrument failed to detect the full extent of desaturation under the experimental conditions and was more likely to fail completely to detect desaturation than the other test instruments when influenced by vasoconstriction (P&lt;0.05). Significant impairment in the performance of all the instruments tested occurred in the presence of normal pulse signals. The duration of detected reductions in oxygen saturation was not significantly affected.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0007-0912</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1471-6771</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1093/bja/62.4.439</identifier><identifier>PMID: 2706182</identifier><identifier>CODEN: BJANAD</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Anesthesia ; Anesthesia. Intensive care medicine. Transfusions. Cell therapy and gene therapy ; Anesthesia: equipment, devices ; Biological and medical sciences ; Blood Circulation ; Constriction ; Humans ; Hypoxia - diagnosis ; Medical sciences ; Oximetry - instrumentation ; Time Factors ; Vasoconstriction ; Veins</subject><ispartof>British journal of anaesthesia : BJA, 1989-04, Vol.62 (4), p.439-444</ispartof><rights>1989</rights><rights>1989 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c438t-d9d27b4fa4926348ab1b59e804dba4d7fea0e9ab6c92d6a2cf2141139919118b3</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=7167762$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/2706182$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>WILKINS, C.J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>MOORES, M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>HANNING, C.D.</creatorcontrib><title>COMPARISON OF PULSE OXIMETERS: EFFECTS OF VASOCONSTRICTION AND VENOUS ENGORGEMENT</title><title>British journal of anaesthesia : BJA</title><addtitle>Br J Anaesth</addtitle><description>The effects of cold-induced vasoconstriction and venous occlusion on the detection of induced hypoxaemia by four pulse oximeters were examined in 10 volunteers. In three further subjects vasoconstriction was maintained until at least one instrument failed to detect the induced hypoxaemia. Time taken to detect hypoxaemia was increased for all instruments to between two and three times the instrument's own control value for both vasoconstriction and venous engorgement (P&lt;0.01). There was highly significant variation in detected minimum saturation between the instruments (P&lt;0.001). One instrument failed to detect the full extent of desaturation under the experimental conditions and was more likely to fail completely to detect desaturation than the other test instruments when influenced by vasoconstriction (P&lt;0.05). Significant impairment in the performance of all the instruments tested occurred in the presence of normal pulse signals. The duration of detected reductions in oxygen saturation was not significantly affected.</description><subject>Anesthesia</subject><subject>Anesthesia. Intensive care medicine. Transfusions. Cell therapy and gene therapy</subject><subject>Anesthesia: equipment, devices</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Blood Circulation</subject><subject>Constriction</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Hypoxia - diagnosis</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Oximetry - instrumentation</subject><subject>Time Factors</subject><subject>Vasoconstriction</subject><subject>Veins</subject><issn>0007-0912</issn><issn>1471-6771</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1989</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNptkM9v0zAUgC0EGmVw44qUA9qJdH6Oa8fcquB2EW08mnSqdrEcx5Ey-mPY7TT-e1K16onTO3yf3nv6EPoMeAhYJLf1k7llZEiHNBFv0AAoh5hxDm_RAGPMYyyAvEcfQnjCGDgRoyt0RThmkJIB-pWp-f14kZeqiNQkul_OShmpVT6XlVyU3yM5mcisKo_sYVyqTBVltcizKu_9cfEjepCFWpaRLKZqMZVzWVQf0bvWrIP7dJ7XaDmRVXYXz9Q0z8az2NIk3ceNaAivaWuoICyhqamhHgmXYtrUhja8dQY7YWpmBWmYIbYlQAESIUAApHVyjW5Oe5_97s_Bhb3edMG69dps3e4QNB9xxjhNevHbSbR-F4J3rX723cb4vxqwPhbUfUHNiKa6L9jrX857D_XGNRf5nKznX8_cBGvWrTdb24WLxqFvz45afNK6sHevF2z8b814wkf6bvWoZ4_8J12tiD6eZSff9c1eOud1sJ3bWtd03tm9bnbd___9BxDkkxM</recordid><startdate>19890401</startdate><enddate>19890401</enddate><creator>WILKINS, C.J.</creator><creator>MOORES, M.</creator><creator>HANNING, C.D.</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Oxford University Press</general><scope>6I.</scope><scope>AAFTH</scope><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19890401</creationdate><title>COMPARISON OF PULSE OXIMETERS: EFFECTS OF VASOCONSTRICTION AND VENOUS ENGORGEMENT</title><author>WILKINS, C.J. ; MOORES, M. ; HANNING, C.D.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c438t-d9d27b4fa4926348ab1b59e804dba4d7fea0e9ab6c92d6a2cf2141139919118b3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1989</creationdate><topic>Anesthesia</topic><topic>Anesthesia. Intensive care medicine. Transfusions. Cell therapy and gene therapy</topic><topic>Anesthesia: equipment, devices</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Blood Circulation</topic><topic>Constriction</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Hypoxia - diagnosis</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Oximetry - instrumentation</topic><topic>Time Factors</topic><topic>Vasoconstriction</topic><topic>Veins</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>WILKINS, C.J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>MOORES, M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>HANNING, C.D.</creatorcontrib><collection>ScienceDirect Open Access Titles</collection><collection>Elsevier:ScienceDirect:Open Access</collection><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>British journal of anaesthesia : BJA</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>WILKINS, C.J.</au><au>MOORES, M.</au><au>HANNING, C.D.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>COMPARISON OF PULSE OXIMETERS: EFFECTS OF VASOCONSTRICTION AND VENOUS ENGORGEMENT</atitle><jtitle>British journal of anaesthesia : BJA</jtitle><addtitle>Br J Anaesth</addtitle><date>1989-04-01</date><risdate>1989</risdate><volume>62</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>439</spage><epage>444</epage><pages>439-444</pages><issn>0007-0912</issn><eissn>1471-6771</eissn><coden>BJANAD</coden><abstract>The effects of cold-induced vasoconstriction and venous occlusion on the detection of induced hypoxaemia by four pulse oximeters were examined in 10 volunteers. In three further subjects vasoconstriction was maintained until at least one instrument failed to detect the induced hypoxaemia. Time taken to detect hypoxaemia was increased for all instruments to between two and three times the instrument's own control value for both vasoconstriction and venous engorgement (P&lt;0.01). There was highly significant variation in detected minimum saturation between the instruments (P&lt;0.001). One instrument failed to detect the full extent of desaturation under the experimental conditions and was more likely to fail completely to detect desaturation than the other test instruments when influenced by vasoconstriction (P&lt;0.05). Significant impairment in the performance of all the instruments tested occurred in the presence of normal pulse signals. The duration of detected reductions in oxygen saturation was not significantly affected.</abstract><cop>Oxford</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>2706182</pmid><doi>10.1093/bja/62.4.439</doi><tpages>6</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0007-0912
ispartof British journal of anaesthesia : BJA, 1989-04, Vol.62 (4), p.439-444
issn 0007-0912
1471-6771
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_75766743
source MEDLINE; Oxford Journals A-Z Collection; Alma/SFX Local Collection; EZB Electronic Journals Library
subjects Anesthesia
Anesthesia. Intensive care medicine. Transfusions. Cell therapy and gene therapy
Anesthesia: equipment, devices
Biological and medical sciences
Blood Circulation
Constriction
Humans
Hypoxia - diagnosis
Medical sciences
Oximetry - instrumentation
Time Factors
Vasoconstriction
Veins
title COMPARISON OF PULSE OXIMETERS: EFFECTS OF VASOCONSTRICTION AND VENOUS ENGORGEMENT
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-07T19%3A18%3A58IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=COMPARISON%20OF%20PULSE%20OXIMETERS:%20EFFECTS%20OF%20VASOCONSTRICTION%20AND%20VENOUS%20ENGORGEMENT&rft.jtitle=British%20journal%20of%20anaesthesia%20:%20BJA&rft.au=WILKINS,%20C.J.&rft.date=1989-04-01&rft.volume=62&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=439&rft.epage=444&rft.pages=439-444&rft.issn=0007-0912&rft.eissn=1471-6771&rft.coden=BJANAD&rft_id=info:doi/10.1093/bja/62.4.439&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E75766743%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=75766743&rft_id=info:pmid/2706182&rft_els_id=S0007091217473843&rfr_iscdi=true