Cognitive Demands of Collision Avoidance in Simulated Ship Control
The study examines the cognitive demands of collision avoidance under a range of maritime scenarios. Operators used a PC-based radar simulator to navigate set courses over 100 6-min trials varying in collision threat and traffic density. Corrective maneuvers were made through the application of stan...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Human factors 2003-06, Vol.45 (2), p.252-265 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 265 |
---|---|
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 252 |
container_title | Human factors |
container_volume | 45 |
creator | Robert, G. Hockey, J. Healey, Alex Crawshaw, Martin Wastell, David G. Sauer, Jürgen |
description | The study examines the cognitive demands of collision avoidance under a range of maritime scenarios. Operators used a PC-based radar simulator to navigate set courses over 100 6-min trials varying in collision threat and traffic density. Corrective maneuvers were made through the application of standard navigation rules and by using two decision aids (target acquisition and test maneuver). Results showed widespread effects of collision threat in terms of decision aid use, subjective workload, and secondary task performance. Most notably, demand increased markedly over the course of emergency trials, in which collision threat resulted from rule violation by target vessels. The findings are discussed in terms of the comparison between predictable demands (requiring standard course changes) and those involving uncertainty about the others' intentions (involving more intensive monitoring and forced delays in corrective action). The study has relevance for the design of collision avoidance systems, specifically for the use of ecological displays. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1518/hfes.45.2.252.27240 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_75750320</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A114049991</galeid><sage_id>10.1518_hfes.45.2.252.27240</sage_id><sourcerecordid>A114049991</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c700t-fc96f65c664e401c880f7da397c0d118b3b29e9faef73ca68438b3df29e1987e3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqF0l2LEzEUBuBBFLeu_gJBBmW9m5qTSSbJZe36BQterF6HNHPSzZJJ6mRmwX9vagtFKUoIgcNzEpK8VfUSyBI4yHd3DvOS8SVdUl6moIw8qhbAmWgkSHhcLQgB2QhK5EX1LOd7QkinWv60ugDGqQIlFtX7ddpGP_kHrK9xMLHPdXL1OoXgs0-xXj0k35tosfaxvvXDHMyEfX1753dFxWlM4Xn1xJmQ8cVxvay-f_zwbf25ufn66ct6ddNYQcjUOKs613HbdQwZASslcaI3rRKW9ABy026oQuUMOtFa00nWllrvShGUFNheVm8P--7G9GPGPOnBZ4shmIhpzlpwwUlLyX8hSEklEXv4-i94n-YxlktoCh3jArquoDcHtDUBtY8uTaOx-x31CoARppSCopozaosRRxNSROdL-Q-_POPL6HHw9mxDe2iwY8p5RKd3ox_M-FMD0fs86H0eNOOa6pIH_TsPpevV8YbzZsD-1HMMQAFXR2CyNcGN5a99PjkOJTVAiyMHl80WT8_0r7N_AbHXye0</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>216457166</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Cognitive Demands of Collision Avoidance in Simulated Ship Control</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>SAGE Complete</source><creator>Robert, G. ; Hockey, J. ; Healey, Alex ; Crawshaw, Martin ; Wastell, David G. ; Sauer, Jürgen</creator><creatorcontrib>Robert, G. ; Hockey, J. ; Healey, Alex ; Crawshaw, Martin ; Wastell, David G. ; Sauer, Jürgen</creatorcontrib><description>The study examines the cognitive demands of collision avoidance under a range of maritime scenarios. Operators used a PC-based radar simulator to navigate set courses over 100 6-min trials varying in collision threat and traffic density. Corrective maneuvers were made through the application of standard navigation rules and by using two decision aids (target acquisition and test maneuver). Results showed widespread effects of collision threat in terms of decision aid use, subjective workload, and secondary task performance. Most notably, demand increased markedly over the course of emergency trials, in which collision threat resulted from rule violation by target vessels. The findings are discussed in terms of the comparison between predictable demands (requiring standard course changes) and those involving uncertainty about the others' intentions (involving more intensive monitoring and forced delays in corrective action). The study has relevance for the design of collision avoidance systems, specifically for the use of ecological displays.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0018-7208</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1547-8181</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1518/hfes.45.2.252.27240</identifier><identifier>PMID: 14529197</identifier><identifier>CODEN: HUFAA6</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London, England: SAGE Publications</publisher><subject>Accident Prevention ; Adult ; Biological and medical sciences ; Cognition ; Collision avoidance ; Computer Simulation ; Ergonomics ; Ergonomics. Human factors ; Female ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; Humans ; Male ; Occupational psychology ; Psychological aspects ; Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry ; Psychology. Psychophysiology ; Sailors ; Seamanship ; Ships ; Space life sciences</subject><ispartof>Human factors, 2003-06, Vol.45 (2), p.252-265</ispartof><rights>2004 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>COPYRIGHT 2003 Sage Publications, Inc.</rights><rights>Copyright Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Summer 2003</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c700t-fc96f65c664e401c880f7da397c0d118b3b29e9faef73ca68438b3df29e1987e3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c700t-fc96f65c664e401c880f7da397c0d118b3b29e9faef73ca68438b3df29e1987e3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1518/hfes.45.2.252.27240$$EPDF$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1518/hfes.45.2.252.27240$$EHTML$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,21799,27903,27904,43600,43601</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=15100012$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/14529197$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Robert, G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hockey, J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Healey, Alex</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Crawshaw, Martin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wastell, David G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sauer, Jürgen</creatorcontrib><title>Cognitive Demands of Collision Avoidance in Simulated Ship Control</title><title>Human factors</title><addtitle>Hum Factors</addtitle><description>The study examines the cognitive demands of collision avoidance under a range of maritime scenarios. Operators used a PC-based radar simulator to navigate set courses over 100 6-min trials varying in collision threat and traffic density. Corrective maneuvers were made through the application of standard navigation rules and by using two decision aids (target acquisition and test maneuver). Results showed widespread effects of collision threat in terms of decision aid use, subjective workload, and secondary task performance. Most notably, demand increased markedly over the course of emergency trials, in which collision threat resulted from rule violation by target vessels. The findings are discussed in terms of the comparison between predictable demands (requiring standard course changes) and those involving uncertainty about the others' intentions (involving more intensive monitoring and forced delays in corrective action). The study has relevance for the design of collision avoidance systems, specifically for the use of ecological displays.</description><subject>Accident Prevention</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Cognition</subject><subject>Collision avoidance</subject><subject>Computer Simulation</subject><subject>Ergonomics</subject><subject>Ergonomics. Human factors</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Occupational psychology</subject><subject>Psychological aspects</subject><subject>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</subject><subject>Psychology. Psychophysiology</subject><subject>Sailors</subject><subject>Seamanship</subject><subject>Ships</subject><subject>Space life sciences</subject><issn>0018-7208</issn><issn>1547-8181</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2003</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AVQMV</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>K50</sourceid><sourceid>M1D</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNqF0l2LEzEUBuBBFLeu_gJBBmW9m5qTSSbJZe36BQterF6HNHPSzZJJ6mRmwX9vagtFKUoIgcNzEpK8VfUSyBI4yHd3DvOS8SVdUl6moIw8qhbAmWgkSHhcLQgB2QhK5EX1LOd7QkinWv60ugDGqQIlFtX7ddpGP_kHrK9xMLHPdXL1OoXgs0-xXj0k35tosfaxvvXDHMyEfX1753dFxWlM4Xn1xJmQ8cVxvay-f_zwbf25ufn66ct6ddNYQcjUOKs613HbdQwZASslcaI3rRKW9ABy026oQuUMOtFa00nWllrvShGUFNheVm8P--7G9GPGPOnBZ4shmIhpzlpwwUlLyX8hSEklEXv4-i94n-YxlktoCh3jArquoDcHtDUBtY8uTaOx-x31CoARppSCopozaosRRxNSROdL-Q-_POPL6HHw9mxDe2iwY8p5RKd3ox_M-FMD0fs86H0eNOOa6pIH_TsPpevV8YbzZsD-1HMMQAFXR2CyNcGN5a99PjkOJTVAiyMHl80WT8_0r7N_AbHXye0</recordid><startdate>20030601</startdate><enddate>20030601</enddate><creator>Robert, G.</creator><creator>Hockey, J.</creator><creator>Healey, Alex</creator><creator>Crawshaw, Martin</creator><creator>Wastell, David G.</creator><creator>Sauer, Jürgen</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><general>Human Factors and Ergonomics Society</general><general>Sage Publications, Inc</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QF</scope><scope>7QQ</scope><scope>7SC</scope><scope>7SE</scope><scope>7SP</scope><scope>7SR</scope><scope>7T2</scope><scope>7TA</scope><scope>7TB</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>7U5</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88C</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88G</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8AF</scope><scope>8BQ</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AVQMV</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>BKSAR</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>F28</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>H8D</scope><scope>H8G</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>JG9</scope><scope>JQ2</scope><scope>K50</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>L~C</scope><scope>L~D</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M0T</scope><scope>M1D</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2M</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PADUT</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PCBAR</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>S0X</scope><scope>7U2</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20030601</creationdate><title>Cognitive Demands of Collision Avoidance in Simulated Ship Control</title><author>Robert, G. ; Hockey, J. ; Healey, Alex ; Crawshaw, Martin ; Wastell, David G. ; Sauer, Jürgen</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c700t-fc96f65c664e401c880f7da397c0d118b3b29e9faef73ca68438b3df29e1987e3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2003</creationdate><topic>Accident Prevention</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Cognition</topic><topic>Collision avoidance</topic><topic>Computer Simulation</topic><topic>Ergonomics</topic><topic>Ergonomics. Human factors</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Occupational psychology</topic><topic>Psychological aspects</topic><topic>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</topic><topic>Psychology. Psychophysiology</topic><topic>Sailors</topic><topic>Seamanship</topic><topic>Ships</topic><topic>Space life sciences</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Robert, G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hockey, J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Healey, Alex</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Crawshaw, Martin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wastell, David G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sauer, Jürgen</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Aluminium Industry Abstracts</collection><collection>Ceramic Abstracts</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts</collection><collection>Corrosion Abstracts</collection><collection>Electronics & Communications Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineered Materials Abstracts</collection><collection>Health and Safety Science Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Materials Business File</collection><collection>Mechanical & Transportation Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>Solid State and Superconductivity Abstracts</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Healthcare Administration Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Psychology Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>STEM Database</collection><collection>METADEX</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Materials Science & Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>Arts Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>eLibrary</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric & Aquatic Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ANTE: Abstracts in New Technology & Engineering</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>Aerospace Database</collection><collection>Copper Technical Reference Library</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Materials Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Computer Science Collection</collection><collection>Art, Design & Architecture Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Academic</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Professional</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Database</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Healthcare Administration Database</collection><collection>Arts & Humanities Database</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Psychology</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Research Library China</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric & Aquatic Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>SIRS Editorial</collection><collection>Safety Science and Risk</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Human factors</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Robert, G.</au><au>Hockey, J.</au><au>Healey, Alex</au><au>Crawshaw, Martin</au><au>Wastell, David G.</au><au>Sauer, Jürgen</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Cognitive Demands of Collision Avoidance in Simulated Ship Control</atitle><jtitle>Human factors</jtitle><addtitle>Hum Factors</addtitle><date>2003-06-01</date><risdate>2003</risdate><volume>45</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>252</spage><epage>265</epage><pages>252-265</pages><issn>0018-7208</issn><eissn>1547-8181</eissn><coden>HUFAA6</coden><abstract>The study examines the cognitive demands of collision avoidance under a range of maritime scenarios. Operators used a PC-based radar simulator to navigate set courses over 100 6-min trials varying in collision threat and traffic density. Corrective maneuvers were made through the application of standard navigation rules and by using two decision aids (target acquisition and test maneuver). Results showed widespread effects of collision threat in terms of decision aid use, subjective workload, and secondary task performance. Most notably, demand increased markedly over the course of emergency trials, in which collision threat resulted from rule violation by target vessels. The findings are discussed in terms of the comparison between predictable demands (requiring standard course changes) and those involving uncertainty about the others' intentions (involving more intensive monitoring and forced delays in corrective action). The study has relevance for the design of collision avoidance systems, specifically for the use of ecological displays.</abstract><cop>London, England</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><pmid>14529197</pmid><doi>10.1518/hfes.45.2.252.27240</doi><tpages>14</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0018-7208 |
ispartof | Human factors, 2003-06, Vol.45 (2), p.252-265 |
issn | 0018-7208 1547-8181 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_75750320 |
source | MEDLINE; SAGE Complete |
subjects | Accident Prevention Adult Biological and medical sciences Cognition Collision avoidance Computer Simulation Ergonomics Ergonomics. Human factors Female Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology Humans Male Occupational psychology Psychological aspects Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry Psychology. Psychophysiology Sailors Seamanship Ships Space life sciences |
title | Cognitive Demands of Collision Avoidance in Simulated Ship Control |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-21T14%3A00%3A10IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Cognitive%20Demands%20of%20Collision%20Avoidance%20in%20Simulated%20Ship%20Control&rft.jtitle=Human%20factors&rft.au=Robert,%20G.&rft.date=2003-06-01&rft.volume=45&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=252&rft.epage=265&rft.pages=252-265&rft.issn=0018-7208&rft.eissn=1547-8181&rft.coden=HUFAA6&rft_id=info:doi/10.1518/hfes.45.2.252.27240&rft_dat=%3Cgale_proqu%3EA114049991%3C/gale_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=216457166&rft_id=info:pmid/14529197&rft_galeid=A114049991&rft_sage_id=10.1518_hfes.45.2.252.27240&rfr_iscdi=true |