The diagnostic accuracy of the PTSD Checklist: A critical review
The PTSD Checklist (PCL) is the most frequently used self-report measure of PTSD symptoms. Although the PCL has been in use for nearly 20 years and over a dozen validation studies have been conducted, this paper provides the first comprehensive review of its diagnostic utility. Eighteen diagnostic a...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Clinical psychology review 2010-12, Vol.30 (8), p.976-987 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 987 |
---|---|
container_issue | 8 |
container_start_page | 976 |
container_title | Clinical psychology review |
container_volume | 30 |
creator | McDonald, Scott D. Calhoun, Patrick S. |
description | The PTSD Checklist (PCL) is the most frequently used self-report measure of PTSD symptoms. Although the PCL has been in use for nearly 20
years and over a dozen validation studies have been conducted, this paper provides the first comprehensive review of its diagnostic utility. Eighteen diagnostic accuracy studies of the PCL are presented, followed by an examination of the potential roles of spectrum effects, bias, and prevalence in understanding the variation in sensitivity, specificity, and other operating characteristics across these studies. Two related issues as to the interchangeability of the PCL's three versions (civilian, military, and specific) and various scoring methods are also discussed. Findings indicate that the PCL has several strengths as a PTSD screening test and suggest that it can be a useful tool when followed by a second-tier diagnostic test such as a standardized interview. However, the PCL's operating characteristics demonstrate significant variation across populations, settings, and research methods and few studies have examined such factors that may moderate the PCL's utility. Recommendations and cautions regarding the use of the PCL as a clinical screening test, a diagnostic tool in research, and as an estimator of PTSD population prevalence are provided.
►The PTSD Checklist has several strengths as a PTSD screening test ►The PTSD Checklist's diagnostic accuracy is affected by spectrum and bias ►The interchangeability of the PTSD Checklist's three versions requires verification ►More research is needed regarding the utility of scoring rules commonly employed |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.cpr.2010.06.012 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_757462318</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0272735810001066</els_id><sourcerecordid>757462318</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c450t-f4bbe42ecbd0d5eea2feeaa20dc6a89c1c5d8c1f5d3fa13e0d5ebb7f0aaa2a9f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kE1PwzAMhiMEgvHxA7ig3jh1OOlHOrgwjU8JCSTGOUodh2V060haEP-eTAOOXGxZfvxKfhg75jDkwMuz-RBXfiggzlAOgYstNuCVzFJZcb7NBiCkSGVWVHtsP4Q5APAq57tsT4CEIpPlgF1OZ5QYp1-XbegcJhqx9xq_ktYmXVw9TZ-vksmM8K1xoTtPxgl6F0HdJJ4-HH0esh2rm0BHP_2AvdxcTyd36cPj7f1k_JBiXkCX2ryuKReEtQFTEGlhY9ECDJa6GiHHwlTIbWEyq3lGa6iupQUdIT2y2QE73eSufPveU-jUwgWkptFLavugZCHzUmS8iiTfkOjbEDxZtfJuof2X4qDW3tRcRW9q7U1BqaK3eHPyk97XCzJ_F7-iInCxASj-GP_2KqCjJZJxnrBTpnX_xH8DupR-ww</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>757462318</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The diagnostic accuracy of the PTSD Checklist: A critical review</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>McDonald, Scott D. ; Calhoun, Patrick S.</creator><creatorcontrib>McDonald, Scott D. ; Calhoun, Patrick S.</creatorcontrib><description>The PTSD Checklist (PCL) is the most frequently used self-report measure of PTSD symptoms. Although the PCL has been in use for nearly 20
years and over a dozen validation studies have been conducted, this paper provides the first comprehensive review of its diagnostic utility. Eighteen diagnostic accuracy studies of the PCL are presented, followed by an examination of the potential roles of spectrum effects, bias, and prevalence in understanding the variation in sensitivity, specificity, and other operating characteristics across these studies. Two related issues as to the interchangeability of the PCL's three versions (civilian, military, and specific) and various scoring methods are also discussed. Findings indicate that the PCL has several strengths as a PTSD screening test and suggest that it can be a useful tool when followed by a second-tier diagnostic test such as a standardized interview. However, the PCL's operating characteristics demonstrate significant variation across populations, settings, and research methods and few studies have examined such factors that may moderate the PCL's utility. Recommendations and cautions regarding the use of the PCL as a clinical screening test, a diagnostic tool in research, and as an estimator of PTSD population prevalence are provided.
►The PTSD Checklist has several strengths as a PTSD screening test ►The PTSD Checklist's diagnostic accuracy is affected by spectrum and bias ►The interchangeability of the PTSD Checklist's three versions requires verification ►More research is needed regarding the utility of scoring rules commonly employed</description><identifier>ISSN: 0272-7358</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-7811</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.cpr.2010.06.012</identifier><identifier>PMID: 20705376</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Checklist ; Cross-Sectional Studies ; Health Surveys ; Humans ; Mass Screening - statistics & numerical data ; Personality Inventory - statistics & numerical data ; Posttraumatic stress disorder ; Prevalence ; Psychometrics - statistics & numerical data ; PTSD Checklist ; Questionnaires ; Reproducibility of Results ; Review ; Sensitivity and specificity ; Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic - diagnosis ; Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic - epidemiology ; Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic - psychology</subject><ispartof>Clinical psychology review, 2010-12, Vol.30 (8), p.976-987</ispartof><rights>2010</rights><rights>Published by Elsevier Ltd.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c450t-f4bbe42ecbd0d5eea2feeaa20dc6a89c1c5d8c1f5d3fa13e0d5ebb7f0aaa2a9f3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c450t-f4bbe42ecbd0d5eea2feeaa20dc6a89c1c5d8c1f5d3fa13e0d5ebb7f0aaa2a9f3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0272735810001066$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,27901,27902,65306</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20705376$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>McDonald, Scott D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Calhoun, Patrick S.</creatorcontrib><title>The diagnostic accuracy of the PTSD Checklist: A critical review</title><title>Clinical psychology review</title><addtitle>Clin Psychol Rev</addtitle><description>The PTSD Checklist (PCL) is the most frequently used self-report measure of PTSD symptoms. Although the PCL has been in use for nearly 20
years and over a dozen validation studies have been conducted, this paper provides the first comprehensive review of its diagnostic utility. Eighteen diagnostic accuracy studies of the PCL are presented, followed by an examination of the potential roles of spectrum effects, bias, and prevalence in understanding the variation in sensitivity, specificity, and other operating characteristics across these studies. Two related issues as to the interchangeability of the PCL's three versions (civilian, military, and specific) and various scoring methods are also discussed. Findings indicate that the PCL has several strengths as a PTSD screening test and suggest that it can be a useful tool when followed by a second-tier diagnostic test such as a standardized interview. However, the PCL's operating characteristics demonstrate significant variation across populations, settings, and research methods and few studies have examined such factors that may moderate the PCL's utility. Recommendations and cautions regarding the use of the PCL as a clinical screening test, a diagnostic tool in research, and as an estimator of PTSD population prevalence are provided.
►The PTSD Checklist has several strengths as a PTSD screening test ►The PTSD Checklist's diagnostic accuracy is affected by spectrum and bias ►The interchangeability of the PTSD Checklist's three versions requires verification ►More research is needed regarding the utility of scoring rules commonly employed</description><subject>Checklist</subject><subject>Cross-Sectional Studies</subject><subject>Health Surveys</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Mass Screening - statistics & numerical data</subject><subject>Personality Inventory - statistics & numerical data</subject><subject>Posttraumatic stress disorder</subject><subject>Prevalence</subject><subject>Psychometrics - statistics & numerical data</subject><subject>PTSD Checklist</subject><subject>Questionnaires</subject><subject>Reproducibility of Results</subject><subject>Review</subject><subject>Sensitivity and specificity</subject><subject>Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic - diagnosis</subject><subject>Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic - epidemiology</subject><subject>Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic - psychology</subject><issn>0272-7358</issn><issn>1873-7811</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2010</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kE1PwzAMhiMEgvHxA7ig3jh1OOlHOrgwjU8JCSTGOUodh2V060haEP-eTAOOXGxZfvxKfhg75jDkwMuz-RBXfiggzlAOgYstNuCVzFJZcb7NBiCkSGVWVHtsP4Q5APAq57tsT4CEIpPlgF1OZ5QYp1-XbegcJhqx9xq_ktYmXVw9TZ-vksmM8K1xoTtPxgl6F0HdJJ4-HH0esh2rm0BHP_2AvdxcTyd36cPj7f1k_JBiXkCX2ryuKReEtQFTEGlhY9ECDJa6GiHHwlTIbWEyq3lGa6iupQUdIT2y2QE73eSufPveU-jUwgWkptFLavugZCHzUmS8iiTfkOjbEDxZtfJuof2X4qDW3tRcRW9q7U1BqaK3eHPyk97XCzJ_F7-iInCxASj-GP_2KqCjJZJxnrBTpnX_xH8DupR-ww</recordid><startdate>20101201</startdate><enddate>20101201</enddate><creator>McDonald, Scott D.</creator><creator>Calhoun, Patrick S.</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20101201</creationdate><title>The diagnostic accuracy of the PTSD Checklist: A critical review</title><author>McDonald, Scott D. ; Calhoun, Patrick S.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c450t-f4bbe42ecbd0d5eea2feeaa20dc6a89c1c5d8c1f5d3fa13e0d5ebb7f0aaa2a9f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2010</creationdate><topic>Checklist</topic><topic>Cross-Sectional Studies</topic><topic>Health Surveys</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Mass Screening - statistics & numerical data</topic><topic>Personality Inventory - statistics & numerical data</topic><topic>Posttraumatic stress disorder</topic><topic>Prevalence</topic><topic>Psychometrics - statistics & numerical data</topic><topic>PTSD Checklist</topic><topic>Questionnaires</topic><topic>Reproducibility of Results</topic><topic>Review</topic><topic>Sensitivity and specificity</topic><topic>Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic - diagnosis</topic><topic>Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic - epidemiology</topic><topic>Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic - psychology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>McDonald, Scott D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Calhoun, Patrick S.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Clinical psychology review</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>McDonald, Scott D.</au><au>Calhoun, Patrick S.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The diagnostic accuracy of the PTSD Checklist: A critical review</atitle><jtitle>Clinical psychology review</jtitle><addtitle>Clin Psychol Rev</addtitle><date>2010-12-01</date><risdate>2010</risdate><volume>30</volume><issue>8</issue><spage>976</spage><epage>987</epage><pages>976-987</pages><issn>0272-7358</issn><eissn>1873-7811</eissn><abstract>The PTSD Checklist (PCL) is the most frequently used self-report measure of PTSD symptoms. Although the PCL has been in use for nearly 20
years and over a dozen validation studies have been conducted, this paper provides the first comprehensive review of its diagnostic utility. Eighteen diagnostic accuracy studies of the PCL are presented, followed by an examination of the potential roles of spectrum effects, bias, and prevalence in understanding the variation in sensitivity, specificity, and other operating characteristics across these studies. Two related issues as to the interchangeability of the PCL's three versions (civilian, military, and specific) and various scoring methods are also discussed. Findings indicate that the PCL has several strengths as a PTSD screening test and suggest that it can be a useful tool when followed by a second-tier diagnostic test such as a standardized interview. However, the PCL's operating characteristics demonstrate significant variation across populations, settings, and research methods and few studies have examined such factors that may moderate the PCL's utility. Recommendations and cautions regarding the use of the PCL as a clinical screening test, a diagnostic tool in research, and as an estimator of PTSD population prevalence are provided.
►The PTSD Checklist has several strengths as a PTSD screening test ►The PTSD Checklist's diagnostic accuracy is affected by spectrum and bias ►The interchangeability of the PTSD Checklist's three versions requires verification ►More research is needed regarding the utility of scoring rules commonly employed</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>20705376</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.cpr.2010.06.012</doi><tpages>12</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0272-7358 |
ispartof | Clinical psychology review, 2010-12, Vol.30 (8), p.976-987 |
issn | 0272-7358 1873-7811 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_757462318 |
source | MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals |
subjects | Checklist Cross-Sectional Studies Health Surveys Humans Mass Screening - statistics & numerical data Personality Inventory - statistics & numerical data Posttraumatic stress disorder Prevalence Psychometrics - statistics & numerical data PTSD Checklist Questionnaires Reproducibility of Results Review Sensitivity and specificity Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic - diagnosis Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic - epidemiology Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic - psychology |
title | The diagnostic accuracy of the PTSD Checklist: A critical review |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-02T02%3A25%3A21IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20diagnostic%20accuracy%20of%20the%20PTSD%20Checklist:%20A%20critical%20review&rft.jtitle=Clinical%20psychology%20review&rft.au=McDonald,%20Scott%20D.&rft.date=2010-12-01&rft.volume=30&rft.issue=8&rft.spage=976&rft.epage=987&rft.pages=976-987&rft.issn=0272-7358&rft.eissn=1873-7811&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.cpr.2010.06.012&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E757462318%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=757462318&rft_id=info:pmid/20705376&rft_els_id=S0272735810001066&rfr_iscdi=true |