The diagnostic accuracy of the PTSD Checklist: A critical review

The PTSD Checklist (PCL) is the most frequently used self-report measure of PTSD symptoms. Although the PCL has been in use for nearly 20 years and over a dozen validation studies have been conducted, this paper provides the first comprehensive review of its diagnostic utility. Eighteen diagnostic a...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Clinical psychology review 2010-12, Vol.30 (8), p.976-987
Hauptverfasser: McDonald, Scott D., Calhoun, Patrick S.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 987
container_issue 8
container_start_page 976
container_title Clinical psychology review
container_volume 30
creator McDonald, Scott D.
Calhoun, Patrick S.
description The PTSD Checklist (PCL) is the most frequently used self-report measure of PTSD symptoms. Although the PCL has been in use for nearly 20 years and over a dozen validation studies have been conducted, this paper provides the first comprehensive review of its diagnostic utility. Eighteen diagnostic accuracy studies of the PCL are presented, followed by an examination of the potential roles of spectrum effects, bias, and prevalence in understanding the variation in sensitivity, specificity, and other operating characteristics across these studies. Two related issues as to the interchangeability of the PCL's three versions (civilian, military, and specific) and various scoring methods are also discussed. Findings indicate that the PCL has several strengths as a PTSD screening test and suggest that it can be a useful tool when followed by a second-tier diagnostic test such as a standardized interview. However, the PCL's operating characteristics demonstrate significant variation across populations, settings, and research methods and few studies have examined such factors that may moderate the PCL's utility. Recommendations and cautions regarding the use of the PCL as a clinical screening test, a diagnostic tool in research, and as an estimator of PTSD population prevalence are provided. ►The PTSD Checklist has several strengths as a PTSD screening test ►The PTSD Checklist's diagnostic accuracy is affected by spectrum and bias ►The interchangeability of the PTSD Checklist's three versions requires verification ►More research is needed regarding the utility of scoring rules commonly employed
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.cpr.2010.06.012
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_757462318</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0272735810001066</els_id><sourcerecordid>757462318</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c450t-f4bbe42ecbd0d5eea2feeaa20dc6a89c1c5d8c1f5d3fa13e0d5ebb7f0aaa2a9f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kE1PwzAMhiMEgvHxA7ig3jh1OOlHOrgwjU8JCSTGOUodh2V060haEP-eTAOOXGxZfvxKfhg75jDkwMuz-RBXfiggzlAOgYstNuCVzFJZcb7NBiCkSGVWVHtsP4Q5APAq57tsT4CEIpPlgF1OZ5QYp1-XbegcJhqx9xq_ktYmXVw9TZ-vksmM8K1xoTtPxgl6F0HdJJ4-HH0esh2rm0BHP_2AvdxcTyd36cPj7f1k_JBiXkCX2ryuKReEtQFTEGlhY9ECDJa6GiHHwlTIbWEyq3lGa6iupQUdIT2y2QE73eSufPveU-jUwgWkptFLavugZCHzUmS8iiTfkOjbEDxZtfJuof2X4qDW3tRcRW9q7U1BqaK3eHPyk97XCzJ_F7-iInCxASj-GP_2KqCjJZJxnrBTpnX_xH8DupR-ww</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>757462318</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The diagnostic accuracy of the PTSD Checklist: A critical review</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>McDonald, Scott D. ; Calhoun, Patrick S.</creator><creatorcontrib>McDonald, Scott D. ; Calhoun, Patrick S.</creatorcontrib><description>The PTSD Checklist (PCL) is the most frequently used self-report measure of PTSD symptoms. Although the PCL has been in use for nearly 20 years and over a dozen validation studies have been conducted, this paper provides the first comprehensive review of its diagnostic utility. Eighteen diagnostic accuracy studies of the PCL are presented, followed by an examination of the potential roles of spectrum effects, bias, and prevalence in understanding the variation in sensitivity, specificity, and other operating characteristics across these studies. Two related issues as to the interchangeability of the PCL's three versions (civilian, military, and specific) and various scoring methods are also discussed. Findings indicate that the PCL has several strengths as a PTSD screening test and suggest that it can be a useful tool when followed by a second-tier diagnostic test such as a standardized interview. However, the PCL's operating characteristics demonstrate significant variation across populations, settings, and research methods and few studies have examined such factors that may moderate the PCL's utility. Recommendations and cautions regarding the use of the PCL as a clinical screening test, a diagnostic tool in research, and as an estimator of PTSD population prevalence are provided. ►The PTSD Checklist has several strengths as a PTSD screening test ►The PTSD Checklist's diagnostic accuracy is affected by spectrum and bias ►The interchangeability of the PTSD Checklist's three versions requires verification ►More research is needed regarding the utility of scoring rules commonly employed</description><identifier>ISSN: 0272-7358</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-7811</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.cpr.2010.06.012</identifier><identifier>PMID: 20705376</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Checklist ; Cross-Sectional Studies ; Health Surveys ; Humans ; Mass Screening - statistics &amp; numerical data ; Personality Inventory - statistics &amp; numerical data ; Posttraumatic stress disorder ; Prevalence ; Psychometrics - statistics &amp; numerical data ; PTSD Checklist ; Questionnaires ; Reproducibility of Results ; Review ; Sensitivity and specificity ; Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic - diagnosis ; Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic - epidemiology ; Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic - psychology</subject><ispartof>Clinical psychology review, 2010-12, Vol.30 (8), p.976-987</ispartof><rights>2010</rights><rights>Published by Elsevier Ltd.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c450t-f4bbe42ecbd0d5eea2feeaa20dc6a89c1c5d8c1f5d3fa13e0d5ebb7f0aaa2a9f3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c450t-f4bbe42ecbd0d5eea2feeaa20dc6a89c1c5d8c1f5d3fa13e0d5ebb7f0aaa2a9f3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0272735810001066$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,27901,27902,65306</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20705376$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>McDonald, Scott D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Calhoun, Patrick S.</creatorcontrib><title>The diagnostic accuracy of the PTSD Checklist: A critical review</title><title>Clinical psychology review</title><addtitle>Clin Psychol Rev</addtitle><description>The PTSD Checklist (PCL) is the most frequently used self-report measure of PTSD symptoms. Although the PCL has been in use for nearly 20 years and over a dozen validation studies have been conducted, this paper provides the first comprehensive review of its diagnostic utility. Eighteen diagnostic accuracy studies of the PCL are presented, followed by an examination of the potential roles of spectrum effects, bias, and prevalence in understanding the variation in sensitivity, specificity, and other operating characteristics across these studies. Two related issues as to the interchangeability of the PCL's three versions (civilian, military, and specific) and various scoring methods are also discussed. Findings indicate that the PCL has several strengths as a PTSD screening test and suggest that it can be a useful tool when followed by a second-tier diagnostic test such as a standardized interview. However, the PCL's operating characteristics demonstrate significant variation across populations, settings, and research methods and few studies have examined such factors that may moderate the PCL's utility. Recommendations and cautions regarding the use of the PCL as a clinical screening test, a diagnostic tool in research, and as an estimator of PTSD population prevalence are provided. ►The PTSD Checklist has several strengths as a PTSD screening test ►The PTSD Checklist's diagnostic accuracy is affected by spectrum and bias ►The interchangeability of the PTSD Checklist's three versions requires verification ►More research is needed regarding the utility of scoring rules commonly employed</description><subject>Checklist</subject><subject>Cross-Sectional Studies</subject><subject>Health Surveys</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Mass Screening - statistics &amp; numerical data</subject><subject>Personality Inventory - statistics &amp; numerical data</subject><subject>Posttraumatic stress disorder</subject><subject>Prevalence</subject><subject>Psychometrics - statistics &amp; numerical data</subject><subject>PTSD Checklist</subject><subject>Questionnaires</subject><subject>Reproducibility of Results</subject><subject>Review</subject><subject>Sensitivity and specificity</subject><subject>Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic - diagnosis</subject><subject>Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic - epidemiology</subject><subject>Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic - psychology</subject><issn>0272-7358</issn><issn>1873-7811</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2010</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kE1PwzAMhiMEgvHxA7ig3jh1OOlHOrgwjU8JCSTGOUodh2V060haEP-eTAOOXGxZfvxKfhg75jDkwMuz-RBXfiggzlAOgYstNuCVzFJZcb7NBiCkSGVWVHtsP4Q5APAq57tsT4CEIpPlgF1OZ5QYp1-XbegcJhqx9xq_ktYmXVw9TZ-vksmM8K1xoTtPxgl6F0HdJJ4-HH0esh2rm0BHP_2AvdxcTyd36cPj7f1k_JBiXkCX2ryuKReEtQFTEGlhY9ECDJa6GiHHwlTIbWEyq3lGa6iupQUdIT2y2QE73eSufPveU-jUwgWkptFLavugZCHzUmS8iiTfkOjbEDxZtfJuof2X4qDW3tRcRW9q7U1BqaK3eHPyk97XCzJ_F7-iInCxASj-GP_2KqCjJZJxnrBTpnX_xH8DupR-ww</recordid><startdate>20101201</startdate><enddate>20101201</enddate><creator>McDonald, Scott D.</creator><creator>Calhoun, Patrick S.</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20101201</creationdate><title>The diagnostic accuracy of the PTSD Checklist: A critical review</title><author>McDonald, Scott D. ; Calhoun, Patrick S.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c450t-f4bbe42ecbd0d5eea2feeaa20dc6a89c1c5d8c1f5d3fa13e0d5ebb7f0aaa2a9f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2010</creationdate><topic>Checklist</topic><topic>Cross-Sectional Studies</topic><topic>Health Surveys</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Mass Screening - statistics &amp; numerical data</topic><topic>Personality Inventory - statistics &amp; numerical data</topic><topic>Posttraumatic stress disorder</topic><topic>Prevalence</topic><topic>Psychometrics - statistics &amp; numerical data</topic><topic>PTSD Checklist</topic><topic>Questionnaires</topic><topic>Reproducibility of Results</topic><topic>Review</topic><topic>Sensitivity and specificity</topic><topic>Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic - diagnosis</topic><topic>Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic - epidemiology</topic><topic>Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic - psychology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>McDonald, Scott D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Calhoun, Patrick S.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Clinical psychology review</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>McDonald, Scott D.</au><au>Calhoun, Patrick S.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The diagnostic accuracy of the PTSD Checklist: A critical review</atitle><jtitle>Clinical psychology review</jtitle><addtitle>Clin Psychol Rev</addtitle><date>2010-12-01</date><risdate>2010</risdate><volume>30</volume><issue>8</issue><spage>976</spage><epage>987</epage><pages>976-987</pages><issn>0272-7358</issn><eissn>1873-7811</eissn><abstract>The PTSD Checklist (PCL) is the most frequently used self-report measure of PTSD symptoms. Although the PCL has been in use for nearly 20 years and over a dozen validation studies have been conducted, this paper provides the first comprehensive review of its diagnostic utility. Eighteen diagnostic accuracy studies of the PCL are presented, followed by an examination of the potential roles of spectrum effects, bias, and prevalence in understanding the variation in sensitivity, specificity, and other operating characteristics across these studies. Two related issues as to the interchangeability of the PCL's three versions (civilian, military, and specific) and various scoring methods are also discussed. Findings indicate that the PCL has several strengths as a PTSD screening test and suggest that it can be a useful tool when followed by a second-tier diagnostic test such as a standardized interview. However, the PCL's operating characteristics demonstrate significant variation across populations, settings, and research methods and few studies have examined such factors that may moderate the PCL's utility. Recommendations and cautions regarding the use of the PCL as a clinical screening test, a diagnostic tool in research, and as an estimator of PTSD population prevalence are provided. ►The PTSD Checklist has several strengths as a PTSD screening test ►The PTSD Checklist's diagnostic accuracy is affected by spectrum and bias ►The interchangeability of the PTSD Checklist's three versions requires verification ►More research is needed regarding the utility of scoring rules commonly employed</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>20705376</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.cpr.2010.06.012</doi><tpages>12</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0272-7358
ispartof Clinical psychology review, 2010-12, Vol.30 (8), p.976-987
issn 0272-7358
1873-7811
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_757462318
source MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals
subjects Checklist
Cross-Sectional Studies
Health Surveys
Humans
Mass Screening - statistics & numerical data
Personality Inventory - statistics & numerical data
Posttraumatic stress disorder
Prevalence
Psychometrics - statistics & numerical data
PTSD Checklist
Questionnaires
Reproducibility of Results
Review
Sensitivity and specificity
Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic - diagnosis
Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic - epidemiology
Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic - psychology
title The diagnostic accuracy of the PTSD Checklist: A critical review
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-02T02%3A25%3A21IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20diagnostic%20accuracy%20of%20the%20PTSD%20Checklist:%20A%20critical%20review&rft.jtitle=Clinical%20psychology%20review&rft.au=McDonald,%20Scott%20D.&rft.date=2010-12-01&rft.volume=30&rft.issue=8&rft.spage=976&rft.epage=987&rft.pages=976-987&rft.issn=0272-7358&rft.eissn=1873-7811&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.cpr.2010.06.012&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E757462318%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=757462318&rft_id=info:pmid/20705376&rft_els_id=S0272735810001066&rfr_iscdi=true