Eliciting policymakers’ and stakeholders’ opinions to help shape health system research priorities in the Middle East and North Africa region

Evidence-informed decisions can strengthen health systems. Literature suggests that engaging policymakers and other stakeholders in research priority-setting exercises increases the likelihood of the utilization of research evidence by policymakers. To our knowledge, there has been no previous prior...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Health policy and planning 2010-01, Vol.25 (1), p.15-27
Hauptverfasser: El-Jardali, Fadi, Makhoul, Jihad, Jamal, Diana, Ranson, Michael Kent, Kronfol, Nabil M, Tchaghchagian, Victoria
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext bestellen
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 27
container_issue 1
container_start_page 15
container_title Health policy and planning
container_volume 25
creator El-Jardali, Fadi
Makhoul, Jihad
Jamal, Diana
Ranson, Michael Kent
Kronfol, Nabil M
Tchaghchagian, Victoria
description Evidence-informed decisions can strengthen health systems. Literature suggests that engaging policymakers and other stakeholders in research priority-setting exercises increases the likelihood of the utilization of research evidence by policymakers. To our knowledge, there has been no previous priority-setting exercise in health policy and systems research in countries of the Middle East and North Africa (MENA) region. This paper presents the results of a recent research priority-setting exercise that identified regional policy concerns and research priorities related to health financing, human resources and the non-state sector, based on stakeholders in nine low and middle income countries (LMICs) of the MENA region. The countries included in this study were Algeria, Egypt, Jordan, Lebanon, Morocco, Palestine, Syria, Tunisia and Yemen. This multi-phased study used a combination of qualitative and quantitative research techniques. The overall approach was guided by the listening priority-setting approach, adapted slightly to accommodate the context of the nine countries. The study was conducted in four key phases: preparatory work, country-specific work, data analysis and synthesis, and validation and ranking. The study identified the top five policy-relevant health systems research priorities for each of the three thematic areas for the next 3–5 years. Study findings can help inform and direct future plans to generate, disseminate and use research evidence for LMICs in the MENA region. Our study process and results could help reduce the great chasm between the policy and research worlds in the MENA region. It is hoped that funding agencies and countries will support and align financial and human resources towards addressing the research priorities that have been identified.
doi_str_mv 10.1093/heapol/czp059
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>jstor_TOX</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_757458188</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>45090619</jstor_id><oup_id>10.1093/heapol/czp059</oup_id><sourcerecordid>45090619</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c578t-4adddfe3f6a6fa8f4371945fedd01e63f0d7bb1f99d89872656e6ffb7d8153db3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFks1u1DAURiMEokNhyRJkdQFsQu34f1mNBopUoEIgUDeWE9uNp0kc7IzEsOIVWPJ6PAkuGbUSC2Zl-_rco6urrygeI_gSQYmPW6vH0B0330dI5Z1igQiDZVVhfrdYwIqJEkEBD4oHKa0hRIQQer84QFISwTlcFD9XnW_85IdLkDW-2fb6ysb0-8cvoAcD0pSfbejMrhZGP_gwJDAF0NpuBKnVo81X3U0tSNs02R5Em6yOTQvG6EPMcpuAH8DUWvDWG9NZsNJp-ut_F2LuO3HRNzr3XWb3w-Ke012yj3bnYfHp1erj8rQ8e__6zfLkrGwoF1NJtDHGWeyYZk4LRzBHklBnjYHIMuyg4XWNnJRGSMErRpllztXcCESxqfFh8Xz2jjF83dg0qd6nxnadHmzYJMUpJ1QgIfaTGAvIkYCZfPZfkgpBqkqy_WB2QkFpBo_-AddhE4e8GFUhyAWR8HrAcoaaGFKK1qm8-V7HrUJQXadEzSlRc0oy_3Qn3dS9Nbf0LhYZeDEDYTPudT2Z0XWaQryBCYUSMiRvZ_M5G99u_nW8UoxjTtXplwtFL9j5Z_Jhqc7xH2I-5Tg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>210784908</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Eliciting policymakers’ and stakeholders’ opinions to help shape health system research priorities in the Middle East and North Africa region</title><source>Oxford Journals Open Access Collection</source><creator>El-Jardali, Fadi ; Makhoul, Jihad ; Jamal, Diana ; Ranson, Michael Kent ; Kronfol, Nabil M ; Tchaghchagian, Victoria</creator><creatorcontrib>El-Jardali, Fadi ; Makhoul, Jihad ; Jamal, Diana ; Ranson, Michael Kent ; Kronfol, Nabil M ; Tchaghchagian, Victoria</creatorcontrib><description>Evidence-informed decisions can strengthen health systems. Literature suggests that engaging policymakers and other stakeholders in research priority-setting exercises increases the likelihood of the utilization of research evidence by policymakers. To our knowledge, there has been no previous priority-setting exercise in health policy and systems research in countries of the Middle East and North Africa (MENA) region. This paper presents the results of a recent research priority-setting exercise that identified regional policy concerns and research priorities related to health financing, human resources and the non-state sector, based on stakeholders in nine low and middle income countries (LMICs) of the MENA region. The countries included in this study were Algeria, Egypt, Jordan, Lebanon, Morocco, Palestine, Syria, Tunisia and Yemen. This multi-phased study used a combination of qualitative and quantitative research techniques. The overall approach was guided by the listening priority-setting approach, adapted slightly to accommodate the context of the nine countries. The study was conducted in four key phases: preparatory work, country-specific work, data analysis and synthesis, and validation and ranking. The study identified the top five policy-relevant health systems research priorities for each of the three thematic areas for the next 3–5 years. Study findings can help inform and direct future plans to generate, disseminate and use research evidence for LMICs in the MENA region. Our study process and results could help reduce the great chasm between the policy and research worlds in the MENA region. It is hoped that funding agencies and countries will support and align financial and human resources towards addressing the research priorities that have been identified.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0268-1080</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1460-2237</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1093/heapol/czp059</identifier><identifier>PMID: 19948770</identifier><identifier>CODEN: HPOPEV</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Oxford University Press</publisher><subject>Administrative Personnel - psychology ; Africa, Northern ; Algeria ; Cross-national analysis ; Decision making ; Delivery of Health Care ; Egypt ; Financing ; Focus Groups ; Health administration ; Health care policy ; health financing ; Health policy ; Health Services Research ; human resources for health ; Humans ; Interviews as Topic ; Jordan ; Lebanon ; low and middle income countries ; Medical research ; Middle East ; Middle East and North Africa ; Morocco ; non-state sector ; North Africa ; Original articles ; Palestine ; Policy making ; Priorities ; Prioritizing ; Regional analysis ; Research priorities ; Research strategies ; Resource allocation ; Stakeholder ; Stakeholders ; Studies ; Syria ; Tunisia</subject><ispartof>Health policy and planning, 2010-01, Vol.25 (1), p.15-27</ispartof><rights>2010 Oxford University Press</rights><rights>Published by Oxford University Press in association with The London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine © The Author 2009; all rights reserved. 2009</rights><rights>Copyright Oxford Publishing Limited(England) Jan 2010</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c578t-4adddfe3f6a6fa8f4371945fedd01e63f0d7bb1f99d89872656e6ffb7d8153db3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c578t-4adddfe3f6a6fa8f4371945fedd01e63f0d7bb1f99d89872656e6ffb7d8153db3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/45090619$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/45090619$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,803,1603,27863,27864,27922,27923,30997,30998,58015,58248</link.rule.ids><linktorsrc>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1093/heapol/czp059$$EView_record_in_Oxford_University_Press$$FView_record_in_$$GOxford_University_Press</linktorsrc><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19948770$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>El-Jardali, Fadi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Makhoul, Jihad</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jamal, Diana</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ranson, Michael Kent</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kronfol, Nabil M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tchaghchagian, Victoria</creatorcontrib><title>Eliciting policymakers’ and stakeholders’ opinions to help shape health system research priorities in the Middle East and North Africa region</title><title>Health policy and planning</title><addtitle>Health Policy Plan</addtitle><description>Evidence-informed decisions can strengthen health systems. Literature suggests that engaging policymakers and other stakeholders in research priority-setting exercises increases the likelihood of the utilization of research evidence by policymakers. To our knowledge, there has been no previous priority-setting exercise in health policy and systems research in countries of the Middle East and North Africa (MENA) region. This paper presents the results of a recent research priority-setting exercise that identified regional policy concerns and research priorities related to health financing, human resources and the non-state sector, based on stakeholders in nine low and middle income countries (LMICs) of the MENA region. The countries included in this study were Algeria, Egypt, Jordan, Lebanon, Morocco, Palestine, Syria, Tunisia and Yemen. This multi-phased study used a combination of qualitative and quantitative research techniques. The overall approach was guided by the listening priority-setting approach, adapted slightly to accommodate the context of the nine countries. The study was conducted in four key phases: preparatory work, country-specific work, data analysis and synthesis, and validation and ranking. The study identified the top five policy-relevant health systems research priorities for each of the three thematic areas for the next 3–5 years. Study findings can help inform and direct future plans to generate, disseminate and use research evidence for LMICs in the MENA region. Our study process and results could help reduce the great chasm between the policy and research worlds in the MENA region. It is hoped that funding agencies and countries will support and align financial and human resources towards addressing the research priorities that have been identified.</description><subject>Administrative Personnel - psychology</subject><subject>Africa, Northern</subject><subject>Algeria</subject><subject>Cross-national analysis</subject><subject>Decision making</subject><subject>Delivery of Health Care</subject><subject>Egypt</subject><subject>Financing</subject><subject>Focus Groups</subject><subject>Health administration</subject><subject>Health care policy</subject><subject>health financing</subject><subject>Health policy</subject><subject>Health Services Research</subject><subject>human resources for health</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Interviews as Topic</subject><subject>Jordan</subject><subject>Lebanon</subject><subject>low and middle income countries</subject><subject>Medical research</subject><subject>Middle East</subject><subject>Middle East and North Africa</subject><subject>Morocco</subject><subject>non-state sector</subject><subject>North Africa</subject><subject>Original articles</subject><subject>Palestine</subject><subject>Policy making</subject><subject>Priorities</subject><subject>Prioritizing</subject><subject>Regional analysis</subject><subject>Research priorities</subject><subject>Research strategies</subject><subject>Resource allocation</subject><subject>Stakeholder</subject><subject>Stakeholders</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Syria</subject><subject>Tunisia</subject><issn>0268-1080</issn><issn>1460-2237</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2010</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><sourceid>7TQ</sourceid><recordid>eNqFks1u1DAURiMEokNhyRJkdQFsQu34f1mNBopUoEIgUDeWE9uNp0kc7IzEsOIVWPJ6PAkuGbUSC2Zl-_rco6urrygeI_gSQYmPW6vH0B0330dI5Z1igQiDZVVhfrdYwIqJEkEBD4oHKa0hRIQQer84QFISwTlcFD9XnW_85IdLkDW-2fb6ysb0-8cvoAcD0pSfbejMrhZGP_gwJDAF0NpuBKnVo81X3U0tSNs02R5Em6yOTQvG6EPMcpuAH8DUWvDWG9NZsNJp-ut_F2LuO3HRNzr3XWb3w-Ke012yj3bnYfHp1erj8rQ8e__6zfLkrGwoF1NJtDHGWeyYZk4LRzBHklBnjYHIMuyg4XWNnJRGSMErRpllztXcCESxqfFh8Xz2jjF83dg0qd6nxnadHmzYJMUpJ1QgIfaTGAvIkYCZfPZfkgpBqkqy_WB2QkFpBo_-AddhE4e8GFUhyAWR8HrAcoaaGFKK1qm8-V7HrUJQXadEzSlRc0oy_3Qn3dS9Nbf0LhYZeDEDYTPudT2Z0XWaQryBCYUSMiRvZ_M5G99u_nW8UoxjTtXplwtFL9j5Z_Jhqc7xH2I-5Tg</recordid><startdate>201001</startdate><enddate>201001</enddate><creator>El-Jardali, Fadi</creator><creator>Makhoul, Jihad</creator><creator>Jamal, Diana</creator><creator>Ranson, Michael Kent</creator><creator>Kronfol, Nabil M</creator><creator>Tchaghchagian, Victoria</creator><general>Oxford University Press</general><general>Oxford Publishing Limited (England)</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QJ</scope><scope>7T2</scope><scope>7TQ</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>DHY</scope><scope>DON</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201001</creationdate><title>Eliciting policymakers’ and stakeholders’ opinions to help shape health system research priorities in the Middle East and North Africa region</title><author>El-Jardali, Fadi ; Makhoul, Jihad ; Jamal, Diana ; Ranson, Michael Kent ; Kronfol, Nabil M ; Tchaghchagian, Victoria</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c578t-4adddfe3f6a6fa8f4371945fedd01e63f0d7bb1f99d89872656e6ffb7d8153db3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2010</creationdate><topic>Administrative Personnel - psychology</topic><topic>Africa, Northern</topic><topic>Algeria</topic><topic>Cross-national analysis</topic><topic>Decision making</topic><topic>Delivery of Health Care</topic><topic>Egypt</topic><topic>Financing</topic><topic>Focus Groups</topic><topic>Health administration</topic><topic>Health care policy</topic><topic>health financing</topic><topic>Health policy</topic><topic>Health Services Research</topic><topic>human resources for health</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Interviews as Topic</topic><topic>Jordan</topic><topic>Lebanon</topic><topic>low and middle income countries</topic><topic>Medical research</topic><topic>Middle East</topic><topic>Middle East and North Africa</topic><topic>Morocco</topic><topic>non-state sector</topic><topic>North Africa</topic><topic>Original articles</topic><topic>Palestine</topic><topic>Policy making</topic><topic>Priorities</topic><topic>Prioritizing</topic><topic>Regional analysis</topic><topic>Research priorities</topic><topic>Research strategies</topic><topic>Resource allocation</topic><topic>Stakeholder</topic><topic>Stakeholders</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Syria</topic><topic>Tunisia</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>El-Jardali, Fadi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Makhoul, Jihad</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jamal, Diana</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ranson, Michael Kent</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kronfol, Nabil M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tchaghchagian, Victoria</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index &amp; Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><collection>Health and Safety Science Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>PAIS Index</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>PAIS International</collection><collection>PAIS International (Ovid)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Health policy and planning</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext_linktorsrc</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>El-Jardali, Fadi</au><au>Makhoul, Jihad</au><au>Jamal, Diana</au><au>Ranson, Michael Kent</au><au>Kronfol, Nabil M</au><au>Tchaghchagian, Victoria</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Eliciting policymakers’ and stakeholders’ opinions to help shape health system research priorities in the Middle East and North Africa region</atitle><jtitle>Health policy and planning</jtitle><addtitle>Health Policy Plan</addtitle><date>2010-01</date><risdate>2010</risdate><volume>25</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>15</spage><epage>27</epage><pages>15-27</pages><issn>0268-1080</issn><eissn>1460-2237</eissn><coden>HPOPEV</coden><abstract>Evidence-informed decisions can strengthen health systems. Literature suggests that engaging policymakers and other stakeholders in research priority-setting exercises increases the likelihood of the utilization of research evidence by policymakers. To our knowledge, there has been no previous priority-setting exercise in health policy and systems research in countries of the Middle East and North Africa (MENA) region. This paper presents the results of a recent research priority-setting exercise that identified regional policy concerns and research priorities related to health financing, human resources and the non-state sector, based on stakeholders in nine low and middle income countries (LMICs) of the MENA region. The countries included in this study were Algeria, Egypt, Jordan, Lebanon, Morocco, Palestine, Syria, Tunisia and Yemen. This multi-phased study used a combination of qualitative and quantitative research techniques. The overall approach was guided by the listening priority-setting approach, adapted slightly to accommodate the context of the nine countries. The study was conducted in four key phases: preparatory work, country-specific work, data analysis and synthesis, and validation and ranking. The study identified the top five policy-relevant health systems research priorities for each of the three thematic areas for the next 3–5 years. Study findings can help inform and direct future plans to generate, disseminate and use research evidence for LMICs in the MENA region. Our study process and results could help reduce the great chasm between the policy and research worlds in the MENA region. It is hoped that funding agencies and countries will support and align financial and human resources towards addressing the research priorities that have been identified.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Oxford University Press</pub><pmid>19948770</pmid><doi>10.1093/heapol/czp059</doi><tpages>13</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext_linktorsrc
identifier ISSN: 0268-1080
ispartof Health policy and planning, 2010-01, Vol.25 (1), p.15-27
issn 0268-1080
1460-2237
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_757458188
source Oxford Journals Open Access Collection
subjects Administrative Personnel - psychology
Africa, Northern
Algeria
Cross-national analysis
Decision making
Delivery of Health Care
Egypt
Financing
Focus Groups
Health administration
Health care policy
health financing
Health policy
Health Services Research
human resources for health
Humans
Interviews as Topic
Jordan
Lebanon
low and middle income countries
Medical research
Middle East
Middle East and North Africa
Morocco
non-state sector
North Africa
Original articles
Palestine
Policy making
Priorities
Prioritizing
Regional analysis
Research priorities
Research strategies
Resource allocation
Stakeholder
Stakeholders
Studies
Syria
Tunisia
title Eliciting policymakers’ and stakeholders’ opinions to help shape health system research priorities in the Middle East and North Africa region
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-10T08%3A04%3A42IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_TOX&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Eliciting%20policymakers%E2%80%99%20and%20stakeholders%E2%80%99%20opinions%20to%20help%20shape%20health%20system%20research%20priorities%20in%20the%20Middle%20East%20and%20North%20Africa%20region&rft.jtitle=Health%20policy%20and%20planning&rft.au=El-Jardali,%20Fadi&rft.date=2010-01&rft.volume=25&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=15&rft.epage=27&rft.pages=15-27&rft.issn=0268-1080&rft.eissn=1460-2237&rft.coden=HPOPEV&rft_id=info:doi/10.1093/heapol/czp059&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_TOX%3E45090619%3C/jstor_TOX%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=210784908&rft_id=info:pmid/19948770&rft_jstor_id=45090619&rft_oup_id=10.1093/heapol/czp059&rfr_iscdi=true