Institutional barriers in labor markets: Examples, impacts, and policies
This paper examines the institutional biases that impede the competitive functioning of labor markets. Two contexts are considered. The first relates to Moroccan labor migrants in The Netherlands, where institutional bias distorts the competitive functioning of the labor market by downgrading the ed...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Socio-economic planning sciences 2010-12, Vol.44 (4), p.193-198 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 198 |
---|---|
container_issue | 4 |
container_start_page | 193 |
container_title | Socio-economic planning sciences |
container_volume | 44 |
creator | Cohen, S.I. Rettab, B. |
description | This paper examines the institutional biases that impede the competitive functioning of labor markets. Two contexts are considered. The first relates to Moroccan labor migrants in The Netherlands, where institutional bias distorts the competitive functioning of the labor market by downgrading the educational returns to migrant workers and acting as a disincentive for further investment in human capital. The second relates to labor markets in Indonesia and Pakistan. Institutional bias in these two countries leads to an exaggeration of labor returns to certified education, and to over-investment in university education. We argue that such biases are fed by misinformed beliefs and group interests, and stand in the way of achieving higher growth and equity. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.seps.2010.07.001 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_757457851</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0038012110000261</els_id><sourcerecordid>757457851</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c296t-2ad7531f19deec662862e905fcf341a23279086a95c459af249e04fb30a71383</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kEtv2zAQhImgAeIm-QM56dZL5SwfEsWil8JImxQGesmdoKkVQkevcmmj_veh6qLHHIYkFjOD5cfYHYc1B17f79eEM60F5AHoNQC_YCveaFnWoPgHtgKQTQlc8Cv2kWgPAEKJasUen0ZKIR1SmEbXFzsXY8BIRRiL3u2mWAwuvmKiL8XDHzfMPdLnIgyz8yk_3NgW89QHH5Bu2GXnesLbf_c1e_7-8Lx5LLe_fjxtvm1LL0ydSuFaXUnecdMi-roWTS3QQNX5TiruhBTaQFM7U3lVGdcJZRBUt5PgNJeNvGafzrVznH4fkJIdAnnsezfidCCrK60q3VQ8O8XZ6eNEFLGzcwz5NyfLwS7Q7N4u0OwCzYK2GVoO_TyHIs7o_ycQkSa_mI9WOqXyccr6m5QuLLOsOYsbablp7EsactnXcxlmHseM1VImNXpsQ0SfbDuF93Z5A-M0ji4</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>757457851</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Institutional barriers in labor markets: Examples, impacts, and policies</title><source>RePEc</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Cohen, S.I. ; Rettab, B.</creator><creatorcontrib>Cohen, S.I. ; Rettab, B.</creatorcontrib><description>This paper examines the institutional biases that impede the competitive functioning of labor markets. Two contexts are considered. The first relates to Moroccan labor migrants in The Netherlands, where institutional bias distorts the competitive functioning of the labor market by downgrading the educational returns to migrant workers and acting as a disincentive for further investment in human capital. The second relates to labor markets in Indonesia and Pakistan. Institutional bias in these two countries leads to an exaggeration of labor returns to certified education, and to over-investment in university education. We argue that such biases are fed by misinformed beliefs and group interests, and stand in the way of achieving higher growth and equity.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0038-0121</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-6041</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.seps.2010.07.001</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Bias ; Competitiveness ; Educational returns ; Human capital ; Indonesia ; Institutions ; Labor market ; Labor market Educational returns Institutions ; Labour market ; Migrant workers ; Netherlands ; Pakistan</subject><ispartof>Socio-economic planning sciences, 2010-12, Vol.44 (4), p.193-198</ispartof><rights>2010 Elsevier Ltd</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c296t-2ad7531f19deec662862e905fcf341a23279086a95c459af249e04fb30a71383</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0038012110000261$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,3994,27903,27904,65309</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://econpapers.repec.org/article/eeesoceps/v_3a44_3ay_3a2010_3ai_3a4_3ap_3a193-198.htm$$DView record in RePEc$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Cohen, S.I.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rettab, B.</creatorcontrib><title>Institutional barriers in labor markets: Examples, impacts, and policies</title><title>Socio-economic planning sciences</title><description>This paper examines the institutional biases that impede the competitive functioning of labor markets. Two contexts are considered. The first relates to Moroccan labor migrants in The Netherlands, where institutional bias distorts the competitive functioning of the labor market by downgrading the educational returns to migrant workers and acting as a disincentive for further investment in human capital. The second relates to labor markets in Indonesia and Pakistan. Institutional bias in these two countries leads to an exaggeration of labor returns to certified education, and to over-investment in university education. We argue that such biases are fed by misinformed beliefs and group interests, and stand in the way of achieving higher growth and equity.</description><subject>Bias</subject><subject>Competitiveness</subject><subject>Educational returns</subject><subject>Human capital</subject><subject>Indonesia</subject><subject>Institutions</subject><subject>Labor market</subject><subject>Labor market Educational returns Institutions</subject><subject>Labour market</subject><subject>Migrant workers</subject><subject>Netherlands</subject><subject>Pakistan</subject><issn>0038-0121</issn><issn>1873-6041</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2010</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>X2L</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kEtv2zAQhImgAeIm-QM56dZL5SwfEsWil8JImxQGesmdoKkVQkevcmmj_veh6qLHHIYkFjOD5cfYHYc1B17f79eEM60F5AHoNQC_YCveaFnWoPgHtgKQTQlc8Cv2kWgPAEKJasUen0ZKIR1SmEbXFzsXY8BIRRiL3u2mWAwuvmKiL8XDHzfMPdLnIgyz8yk_3NgW89QHH5Bu2GXnesLbf_c1e_7-8Lx5LLe_fjxtvm1LL0ydSuFaXUnecdMi-roWTS3QQNX5TiruhBTaQFM7U3lVGdcJZRBUt5PgNJeNvGafzrVznH4fkJIdAnnsezfidCCrK60q3VQ8O8XZ6eNEFLGzcwz5NyfLwS7Q7N4u0OwCzYK2GVoO_TyHIs7o_ycQkSa_mI9WOqXyccr6m5QuLLOsOYsbablp7EsactnXcxlmHseM1VImNXpsQ0SfbDuF93Z5A-M0ji4</recordid><startdate>201012</startdate><enddate>201012</enddate><creator>Cohen, S.I.</creator><creator>Rettab, B.</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Elsevier</general><scope>DKI</scope><scope>X2L</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201012</creationdate><title>Institutional barriers in labor markets: Examples, impacts, and policies</title><author>Cohen, S.I. ; Rettab, B.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c296t-2ad7531f19deec662862e905fcf341a23279086a95c459af249e04fb30a71383</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2010</creationdate><topic>Bias</topic><topic>Competitiveness</topic><topic>Educational returns</topic><topic>Human capital</topic><topic>Indonesia</topic><topic>Institutions</topic><topic>Labor market</topic><topic>Labor market Educational returns Institutions</topic><topic>Labour market</topic><topic>Migrant workers</topic><topic>Netherlands</topic><topic>Pakistan</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Cohen, S.I.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rettab, B.</creatorcontrib><collection>RePEc IDEAS</collection><collection>RePEc</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><jtitle>Socio-economic planning sciences</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Cohen, S.I.</au><au>Rettab, B.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Institutional barriers in labor markets: Examples, impacts, and policies</atitle><jtitle>Socio-economic planning sciences</jtitle><date>2010-12</date><risdate>2010</risdate><volume>44</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>193</spage><epage>198</epage><pages>193-198</pages><issn>0038-0121</issn><eissn>1873-6041</eissn><abstract>This paper examines the institutional biases that impede the competitive functioning of labor markets. Two contexts are considered. The first relates to Moroccan labor migrants in The Netherlands, where institutional bias distorts the competitive functioning of the labor market by downgrading the educational returns to migrant workers and acting as a disincentive for further investment in human capital. The second relates to labor markets in Indonesia and Pakistan. Institutional bias in these two countries leads to an exaggeration of labor returns to certified education, and to over-investment in university education. We argue that such biases are fed by misinformed beliefs and group interests, and stand in the way of achieving higher growth and equity.</abstract><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><doi>10.1016/j.seps.2010.07.001</doi><tpages>6</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0038-0121 |
ispartof | Socio-economic planning sciences, 2010-12, Vol.44 (4), p.193-198 |
issn | 0038-0121 1873-6041 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_757457851 |
source | RePEc; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals |
subjects | Bias Competitiveness Educational returns Human capital Indonesia Institutions Labor market Labor market Educational returns Institutions Labour market Migrant workers Netherlands Pakistan |
title | Institutional barriers in labor markets: Examples, impacts, and policies |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-28T03%3A02%3A31IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Institutional%20barriers%20in%20labor%20markets:%20Examples,%20impacts,%20and%20policies&rft.jtitle=Socio-economic%20planning%20sciences&rft.au=Cohen,%20S.I.&rft.date=2010-12&rft.volume=44&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=193&rft.epage=198&rft.pages=193-198&rft.issn=0038-0121&rft.eissn=1873-6041&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.seps.2010.07.001&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E757457851%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=757457851&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=S0038012110000261&rfr_iscdi=true |