Attachment and Cooperation in Religious Groups: A Comment
Anderson comments that Weingarten and Chishoim (2009) are to be congratulated on a fascinating and stimulating article. However, it suffers from a lack of any real definition of "religion." This might not matter, except for three things. First, most (if not all) of the evolution-of-religio...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Current anthropology 2010-06, Vol.51 (3), p.421-421 |
---|---|
1. Verfasser: | |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Anderson comments that Weingarten and Chishoim (2009) are to be congratulated on a fascinating and stimulating article. However, it suffers from a lack of any real definition of "religion." This might not matter, except for three things. First, most (if not all) of the evolution-of-religion literature that Weingarten and Chishoim are addressing shares this lack of definition. Second, "religion" is a Western concept, and most societies worldwide (especially the small-scale, traditional societies) do not have an equivalent word or concept. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0011-3204 1537-5382 |
DOI: | 10.1086/652645 |