Growth characteristics of bifidobacteria in ultrafiltered milk
Five replicates of raw skim milk were ultrafiltered at 54 degrees C to total protein concentration ratios of 2:1, 3:1, 4:1, and 5:1. Bifidobacterium bifidum and Bifidobacterium longum were inoculated at 5% into skim milk that was not ultrafiltered (1:1) and into ultrafiltered skim milks followed by...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of dairy science 1993-04, Vol.76 (4), p.962-971 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 971 |
---|---|
container_issue | 4 |
container_start_page | 962 |
container_title | Journal of dairy science |
container_volume | 76 |
creator | Ventling, B.L. (H.E. Butt Grocery Co., San Antonio, TX) Mistry, V.V |
description | Five replicates of raw skim milk were ultrafiltered at 54 degrees C to total protein concentration ratios of 2:1, 3:1, 4:1, and 5:1. Bifidobacterium bifidum and Bifidobacterium longum were inoculated at 5% into skim milk that was not ultrafiltered (1:1) and into ultrafiltered skim milks followed by incubation at 37 degrees C. The mean maximum bacterial count (colony-forming units per milliliter) range and protein concentration ratio were from 6.25 X 10(8) to 1.69 X 10(9), skim milk; 4.42 X 10(8) to 3.56 X 10(9), 2:1; 2.62 X 10(8) to 3.94 X 10(9), 3:1; 6.67 X 10(8) to 1.88 X 10(9), 4:1; and 2.90 X 10(9) to 3.59 X 10(9), 5:1. The mean developed acidity at maximum B. bifidum population in skim milk was 0.16%, and pH was 5.55. The 5:1 concentrate had a higher mean developed acidity of 0.57% at pH 5.35, which was similar to that of the skim milk. Trends were similar for B. longum. Because of the increased buffering capacity of highly concentrated ultrafiltered milks, pH 5.5 or higher was maintained longer, along with high developed acidity. Scanning electron micrographs showed distinct morphological variations between bifidobacteria grown in broth versus those grown in the milks |
doi_str_mv | 10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(93)77423-8 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_75731009</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>75731009</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c469t-9023db7f792d3205530df76ec58392fe9f40d7375a157d61b3a6fa79a3c72a0f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdkV1rFDEUhoModV39A4Iw4gf1Ymo-J8mNIEVboeBF7XU4k49u1sxOTWYo_ffNdpa98CrknOe85-U9CL0n-IyRTn3dunJ2jTGlLWaYnmr2RUpOWaueoRURVLSMaPUcrY7IS_SqlG39EorFCTpRXHWKyxX6dpHH-2nT2A1ksJPPsUzRlmYMTR9DdGO_VKGJu2ZOU4YQUy141wwx_X2NXgRIxb85vGt08_PHn_PL9ur3xa_z71et5Z2eWo0pc70MUlPHqgPBsAuy81YopmnwOnDsJJMCiJCuIz2DLoDUwKykgANbo8-L7l0e_82-TGaIxfqUYOfHuRgpJCMY6wp--A_cjnPeVW-GKCmJIISzSumFsnksJftg7nIcID8Ygs0-YVMTNk8Jm318RjPzlLBRdfbdYcPcD94dJw-R1v7HQx-KhRQy7GwsR4wrzXH1sEafFmwTbzf3MXtTBkipipL9ctkZbnRHK_d24QKMBm7rfczNdZUQXHH2CCSZmLo</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1877151143</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Growth characteristics of bifidobacteria in ultrafiltered milk</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>Periodicals Index Online</source><creator>Ventling, B.L. (H.E. Butt Grocery Co., San Antonio, TX) ; Mistry, V.V</creator><creatorcontrib>Ventling, B.L. (H.E. Butt Grocery Co., San Antonio, TX) ; Mistry, V.V</creatorcontrib><description>Five replicates of raw skim milk were ultrafiltered at 54 degrees C to total protein concentration ratios of 2:1, 3:1, 4:1, and 5:1. Bifidobacterium bifidum and Bifidobacterium longum were inoculated at 5% into skim milk that was not ultrafiltered (1:1) and into ultrafiltered skim milks followed by incubation at 37 degrees C. The mean maximum bacterial count (colony-forming units per milliliter) range and protein concentration ratio were from 6.25 X 10(8) to 1.69 X 10(9), skim milk; 4.42 X 10(8) to 3.56 X 10(9), 2:1; 2.62 X 10(8) to 3.94 X 10(9), 3:1; 6.67 X 10(8) to 1.88 X 10(9), 4:1; and 2.90 X 10(9) to 3.59 X 10(9), 5:1. The mean developed acidity at maximum B. bifidum population in skim milk was 0.16%, and pH was 5.55. The 5:1 concentrate had a higher mean developed acidity of 0.57% at pH 5.35, which was similar to that of the skim milk. Trends were similar for B. longum. Because of the increased buffering capacity of highly concentrated ultrafiltered milks, pH 5.5 or higher was maintained longer, along with high developed acidity. Scanning electron micrographs showed distinct morphological variations between bifidobacteria grown in broth versus those grown in the milks</description><identifier>ISSN: 0022-0302</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1525-3198</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(93)77423-8</identifier><identifier>PMID: 8486847</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JDSCAE</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Savoy, IL: Am Dairy Sci Assoc</publisher><subject>Acetates - metabolism ; Acetic Acid ; ANIMAL UTILE ; ANIMALES UTILES ; Animals ; BACTERIA ; BIFIDOBACTERIUM ; Bifidobacterium - growth & development ; Bifidobacterium - metabolism ; Bifidobacterium - ultrastructure ; Biological and medical sciences ; Colony Count, Microbial ; CONTEO DE CELULAS ; Fermentation ; FLORA MICROBIANA ; FLORE MICROBIENNE ; Food industries ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; Hydrogen-Ion Concentration ; INTESTIN ; INTESTINOS ; Lactates - biosynthesis ; Lactic Acid ; LAIT ; LECHE ; MEDIO DE CULTIVO ; MICROSCOPIA ; MICROSCOPIE ; Microscopy, Electron, Scanning ; MILIEU DE CULTURE ; Milk - microbiology ; Milk and cheese industries. Ice creams ; NUMERATION CELLULAIRE ; ULTRAFILTRACION ; ULTRAFILTRATION</subject><ispartof>Journal of dairy science, 1993-04, Vol.76 (4), p.962-971</ispartof><rights>1993 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c469t-9023db7f792d3205530df76ec58392fe9f40d7375a157d61b3a6fa79a3c72a0f3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c469t-9023db7f792d3205530df76ec58392fe9f40d7375a157d61b3a6fa79a3c72a0f3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27846,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=4894014$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8486847$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Ventling, B.L. (H.E. Butt Grocery Co., San Antonio, TX)</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mistry, V.V</creatorcontrib><title>Growth characteristics of bifidobacteria in ultrafiltered milk</title><title>Journal of dairy science</title><addtitle>J Dairy Sci</addtitle><description>Five replicates of raw skim milk were ultrafiltered at 54 degrees C to total protein concentration ratios of 2:1, 3:1, 4:1, and 5:1. Bifidobacterium bifidum and Bifidobacterium longum were inoculated at 5% into skim milk that was not ultrafiltered (1:1) and into ultrafiltered skim milks followed by incubation at 37 degrees C. The mean maximum bacterial count (colony-forming units per milliliter) range and protein concentration ratio were from 6.25 X 10(8) to 1.69 X 10(9), skim milk; 4.42 X 10(8) to 3.56 X 10(9), 2:1; 2.62 X 10(8) to 3.94 X 10(9), 3:1; 6.67 X 10(8) to 1.88 X 10(9), 4:1; and 2.90 X 10(9) to 3.59 X 10(9), 5:1. The mean developed acidity at maximum B. bifidum population in skim milk was 0.16%, and pH was 5.55. The 5:1 concentrate had a higher mean developed acidity of 0.57% at pH 5.35, which was similar to that of the skim milk. Trends were similar for B. longum. Because of the increased buffering capacity of highly concentrated ultrafiltered milks, pH 5.5 or higher was maintained longer, along with high developed acidity. Scanning electron micrographs showed distinct morphological variations between bifidobacteria grown in broth versus those grown in the milks</description><subject>Acetates - metabolism</subject><subject>Acetic Acid</subject><subject>ANIMAL UTILE</subject><subject>ANIMALES UTILES</subject><subject>Animals</subject><subject>BACTERIA</subject><subject>BIFIDOBACTERIUM</subject><subject>Bifidobacterium - growth & development</subject><subject>Bifidobacterium - metabolism</subject><subject>Bifidobacterium - ultrastructure</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Colony Count, Microbial</subject><subject>CONTEO DE CELULAS</subject><subject>Fermentation</subject><subject>FLORA MICROBIANA</subject><subject>FLORE MICROBIENNE</subject><subject>Food industries</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>Hydrogen-Ion Concentration</subject><subject>INTESTIN</subject><subject>INTESTINOS</subject><subject>Lactates - biosynthesis</subject><subject>Lactic Acid</subject><subject>LAIT</subject><subject>LECHE</subject><subject>MEDIO DE CULTIVO</subject><subject>MICROSCOPIA</subject><subject>MICROSCOPIE</subject><subject>Microscopy, Electron, Scanning</subject><subject>MILIEU DE CULTURE</subject><subject>Milk - microbiology</subject><subject>Milk and cheese industries. Ice creams</subject><subject>NUMERATION CELLULAIRE</subject><subject>ULTRAFILTRACION</subject><subject>ULTRAFILTRATION</subject><issn>0022-0302</issn><issn>1525-3198</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1993</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>K30</sourceid><recordid>eNpdkV1rFDEUhoModV39A4Iw4gf1Ymo-J8mNIEVboeBF7XU4k49u1sxOTWYo_ffNdpa98CrknOe85-U9CL0n-IyRTn3dunJ2jTGlLWaYnmr2RUpOWaueoRURVLSMaPUcrY7IS_SqlG39EorFCTpRXHWKyxX6dpHH-2nT2A1ksJPPsUzRlmYMTR9DdGO_VKGJu2ZOU4YQUy141wwx_X2NXgRIxb85vGt08_PHn_PL9ur3xa_z71et5Z2eWo0pc70MUlPHqgPBsAuy81YopmnwOnDsJJMCiJCuIz2DLoDUwKykgANbo8-L7l0e_82-TGaIxfqUYOfHuRgpJCMY6wp--A_cjnPeVW-GKCmJIISzSumFsnksJftg7nIcID8Ygs0-YVMTNk8Jm318RjPzlLBRdfbdYcPcD94dJw-R1v7HQx-KhRQy7GwsR4wrzXH1sEafFmwTbzf3MXtTBkipipL9ctkZbnRHK_d24QKMBm7rfczNdZUQXHH2CCSZmLo</recordid><startdate>19930401</startdate><enddate>19930401</enddate><creator>Ventling, B.L. (H.E. Butt Grocery Co., San Antonio, TX)</creator><creator>Mistry, V.V</creator><general>Am Dairy Sci Assoc</general><general>American Dairy Science Association</general><scope>FBQ</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7WH</scope><scope>K30</scope><scope>PAAUG</scope><scope>PAWHS</scope><scope>PAWZZ</scope><scope>PAXOH</scope><scope>PBHAV</scope><scope>PBQSW</scope><scope>PBYQZ</scope><scope>PCIWU</scope><scope>PCMID</scope><scope>PCZJX</scope><scope>PDGRG</scope><scope>PDWWI</scope><scope>PETMR</scope><scope>PFVGT</scope><scope>PGXDX</scope><scope>PIHIL</scope><scope>PISVA</scope><scope>PJCTQ</scope><scope>PJTMS</scope><scope>PLCHJ</scope><scope>PMHAD</scope><scope>PNQDJ</scope><scope>POUND</scope><scope>PPLAD</scope><scope>PQAPC</scope><scope>PQCAN</scope><scope>PQCMW</scope><scope>PQEME</scope><scope>PQHKH</scope><scope>PQMID</scope><scope>PQNCT</scope><scope>PQNET</scope><scope>PQSCT</scope><scope>PQSET</scope><scope>PSVJG</scope><scope>PVMQY</scope><scope>PZGFC</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19930401</creationdate><title>Growth characteristics of bifidobacteria in ultrafiltered milk</title><author>Ventling, B.L. (H.E. Butt Grocery Co., San Antonio, TX) ; Mistry, V.V</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c469t-9023db7f792d3205530df76ec58392fe9f40d7375a157d61b3a6fa79a3c72a0f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1993</creationdate><topic>Acetates - metabolism</topic><topic>Acetic Acid</topic><topic>ANIMAL UTILE</topic><topic>ANIMALES UTILES</topic><topic>Animals</topic><topic>BACTERIA</topic><topic>BIFIDOBACTERIUM</topic><topic>Bifidobacterium - growth & development</topic><topic>Bifidobacterium - metabolism</topic><topic>Bifidobacterium - ultrastructure</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Colony Count, Microbial</topic><topic>CONTEO DE CELULAS</topic><topic>Fermentation</topic><topic>FLORA MICROBIANA</topic><topic>FLORE MICROBIENNE</topic><topic>Food industries</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>Hydrogen-Ion Concentration</topic><topic>INTESTIN</topic><topic>INTESTINOS</topic><topic>Lactates - biosynthesis</topic><topic>Lactic Acid</topic><topic>LAIT</topic><topic>LECHE</topic><topic>MEDIO DE CULTIVO</topic><topic>MICROSCOPIA</topic><topic>MICROSCOPIE</topic><topic>Microscopy, Electron, Scanning</topic><topic>MILIEU DE CULTURE</topic><topic>Milk - microbiology</topic><topic>Milk and cheese industries. Ice creams</topic><topic>NUMERATION CELLULAIRE</topic><topic>ULTRAFILTRACION</topic><topic>ULTRAFILTRATION</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Ventling, B.L. (H.E. Butt Grocery Co., San Antonio, TX)</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mistry, V.V</creatorcontrib><collection>AGRIS</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 50</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - West</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - MEA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - West</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segments 1-50</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - MEA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - West</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - MEA</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of dairy science</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Ventling, B.L. (H.E. Butt Grocery Co., San Antonio, TX)</au><au>Mistry, V.V</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Growth characteristics of bifidobacteria in ultrafiltered milk</atitle><jtitle>Journal of dairy science</jtitle><addtitle>J Dairy Sci</addtitle><date>1993-04-01</date><risdate>1993</risdate><volume>76</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>962</spage><epage>971</epage><pages>962-971</pages><issn>0022-0302</issn><eissn>1525-3198</eissn><coden>JDSCAE</coden><abstract>Five replicates of raw skim milk were ultrafiltered at 54 degrees C to total protein concentration ratios of 2:1, 3:1, 4:1, and 5:1. Bifidobacterium bifidum and Bifidobacterium longum were inoculated at 5% into skim milk that was not ultrafiltered (1:1) and into ultrafiltered skim milks followed by incubation at 37 degrees C. The mean maximum bacterial count (colony-forming units per milliliter) range and protein concentration ratio were from 6.25 X 10(8) to 1.69 X 10(9), skim milk; 4.42 X 10(8) to 3.56 X 10(9), 2:1; 2.62 X 10(8) to 3.94 X 10(9), 3:1; 6.67 X 10(8) to 1.88 X 10(9), 4:1; and 2.90 X 10(9) to 3.59 X 10(9), 5:1. The mean developed acidity at maximum B. bifidum population in skim milk was 0.16%, and pH was 5.55. The 5:1 concentrate had a higher mean developed acidity of 0.57% at pH 5.35, which was similar to that of the skim milk. Trends were similar for B. longum. Because of the increased buffering capacity of highly concentrated ultrafiltered milks, pH 5.5 or higher was maintained longer, along with high developed acidity. Scanning electron micrographs showed distinct morphological variations between bifidobacteria grown in broth versus those grown in the milks</abstract><cop>Savoy, IL</cop><pub>Am Dairy Sci Assoc</pub><pmid>8486847</pmid><doi>10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(93)77423-8</doi><tpages>10</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0022-0302 |
ispartof | Journal of dairy science, 1993-04, Vol.76 (4), p.962-971 |
issn | 0022-0302 1525-3198 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_75731009 |
source | MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; Periodicals Index Online |
subjects | Acetates - metabolism Acetic Acid ANIMAL UTILE ANIMALES UTILES Animals BACTERIA BIFIDOBACTERIUM Bifidobacterium - growth & development Bifidobacterium - metabolism Bifidobacterium - ultrastructure Biological and medical sciences Colony Count, Microbial CONTEO DE CELULAS Fermentation FLORA MICROBIANA FLORE MICROBIENNE Food industries Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology Hydrogen-Ion Concentration INTESTIN INTESTINOS Lactates - biosynthesis Lactic Acid LAIT LECHE MEDIO DE CULTIVO MICROSCOPIA MICROSCOPIE Microscopy, Electron, Scanning MILIEU DE CULTURE Milk - microbiology Milk and cheese industries. Ice creams NUMERATION CELLULAIRE ULTRAFILTRACION ULTRAFILTRATION |
title | Growth characteristics of bifidobacteria in ultrafiltered milk |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-05T06%3A32%3A43IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Growth%20characteristics%20of%20bifidobacteria%20in%20ultrafiltered%20milk&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20dairy%20science&rft.au=Ventling,%20B.L.%20(H.E.%20Butt%20Grocery%20Co.,%20San%20Antonio,%20TX)&rft.date=1993-04-01&rft.volume=76&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=962&rft.epage=971&rft.pages=962-971&rft.issn=0022-0302&rft.eissn=1525-3198&rft.coden=JDSCAE&rft_id=info:doi/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(93)77423-8&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E75731009%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1877151143&rft_id=info:pmid/8486847&rfr_iscdi=true |