Weight Loss Outcome After Silastic Ring Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass: 8 Years of Follow-up

Background An underlying major aim of bariatric surgery is weight loss and its long-term maintenance. In spite of this, most studies regarding weight loss after surgical treatment of morbid obesity show 3-year follow-up results. We evaluated the effectiveness of silastic ring Roux-en-Y gastric bypas...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Obesity surgery 2010-11, Vol.20 (11), p.1491-1495
Hauptverfasser: Valezi, Antonio Carlos, Junior, Jorge Mali, de Menezes, Mariano Almeida, de Brito, Edivaldo Macedo, de Souza, Shirley A. F.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1495
container_issue 11
container_start_page 1491
container_title Obesity surgery
container_volume 20
creator Valezi, Antonio Carlos
Junior, Jorge Mali
de Menezes, Mariano Almeida
de Brito, Edivaldo Macedo
de Souza, Shirley A. F.
description Background An underlying major aim of bariatric surgery is weight loss and its long-term maintenance. In spite of this, most studies regarding weight loss after surgical treatment of morbid obesity show 3-year follow-up results. We evaluated the effectiveness of silastic ring Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (SR-RYGBP) in promoting significant weight loss after an 8-year follow-up at the Londrina State University Hospital. Methods From May 1999 to December 2000, 211 morbidly obese patients were submitted to SR-RYGBP by the same surgical team. The study’s design was longitudinal, prospective, and descriptive. The analysis of postoperative weight decrease was based on excess weight loss in percentage (%EWL) and the calculation of body mass index. Therapeutic failure was considered when patients lost
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s11695-010-0264-2
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_757176545</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2402368461</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c403t-9cc397310a055fee9035a60b4439d66bf4fb576fc7b682ca639ca0c658d1b3723</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kUtLJDEURoM4aI_jD3AzBDfOJnqTVF7uVNQRGgTnhauQSqd6SqorbVKF-u8nTfuAAV0Fbs797k0OQnsUDimAOsqUSiMIUCDAZEXYBppQBZpAxfQmmoCRQLRhfBt9zvkOgFHJ2BbaZqApNUJP0O8_oZ3_HfA05oyvx8HHRcAnzRAS_tF2Lg-txzdtP8c3cXwkoSe3-LJUUymfPi1dzsdY49vgUsaxwRex6-IDGZdf0KfGdTnsPp876NfF-c-z72R6fXl1djIlvgI-EOM9N4pTcCBEE4IBLpyEuqq4mUlZN1VTCyUbr2qpmXeSG-_AS6FntOaK8R10sM5dpng_hjzYRZt96DrXhzhmq4SiSopKFPLbhyTVXHFWKcMLuv8fehfH1Jd3WK00cA1qBdE15FP5uhQau0ztwqUnS8Gu7Ni1HVvs2JUdu9r263PwWC_C7LXjRUcB2BrI5aqfh_Q2-f3Uf6jdlyQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>878038073</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Weight Loss Outcome After Silastic Ring Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass: 8 Years of Follow-up</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings</source><creator>Valezi, Antonio Carlos ; Junior, Jorge Mali ; de Menezes, Mariano Almeida ; de Brito, Edivaldo Macedo ; de Souza, Shirley A. F.</creator><creatorcontrib>Valezi, Antonio Carlos ; Junior, Jorge Mali ; de Menezes, Mariano Almeida ; de Brito, Edivaldo Macedo ; de Souza, Shirley A. F.</creatorcontrib><description>Background An underlying major aim of bariatric surgery is weight loss and its long-term maintenance. In spite of this, most studies regarding weight loss after surgical treatment of morbid obesity show 3-year follow-up results. We evaluated the effectiveness of silastic ring Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (SR-RYGBP) in promoting significant weight loss after an 8-year follow-up at the Londrina State University Hospital. Methods From May 1999 to December 2000, 211 morbidly obese patients were submitted to SR-RYGBP by the same surgical team. The study’s design was longitudinal, prospective, and descriptive. The analysis of postoperative weight decrease was based on excess weight loss in percentage (%EWL) and the calculation of body mass index. Therapeutic failure was considered when patients lost &lt;50% of excess weight. Results Patients lost to follow-up were 36.5%; therefore, 134 patients were included in this study. The average global EWL was 67.6 ± 14.9% on the first postoperative year, 72.6 ± 14.9% on the second year, 69.7 ± 15.1% on the fifth postoperative year, and 66.8 ± 7.6% on the eight postoperative year. Surgical treatment failure occurred in 15 patients (7.1%) over 8 years. Conclusions SR-RYGBP was effective in promoting and maintaining weight loss in the long term with a low failure rate.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0960-8923</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1708-0428</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s11695-010-0264-2</identifier><identifier>PMID: 20811958</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York: Springer-Verlag</publisher><subject>Adolescent ; Adult ; Aged ; Clinical outcomes ; Clinical Research ; Female ; Follow-Up Studies ; Gastric Bypass - methods ; Gastrointestinal surgery ; Humans ; Long term ; Male ; Medicine ; Medicine &amp; Public Health ; Middle Aged ; Obesity ; Obesity, Morbid - surgery ; Prospective Studies ; Prostheses and Implants ; Surgery ; Treatment Outcome ; Weight control ; Weight Loss ; Young Adult</subject><ispartof>Obesity surgery, 2010-11, Vol.20 (11), p.1491-1495</ispartof><rights>Springer Science + Business Media, LLC 2010</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c403t-9cc397310a055fee9035a60b4439d66bf4fb576fc7b682ca639ca0c658d1b3723</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c403t-9cc397310a055fee9035a60b4439d66bf4fb576fc7b682ca639ca0c658d1b3723</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s11695-010-0264-2$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11695-010-0264-2$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27915,27916,41479,42548,51310</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20811958$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Valezi, Antonio Carlos</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Junior, Jorge Mali</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>de Menezes, Mariano Almeida</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>de Brito, Edivaldo Macedo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>de Souza, Shirley A. F.</creatorcontrib><title>Weight Loss Outcome After Silastic Ring Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass: 8 Years of Follow-up</title><title>Obesity surgery</title><addtitle>OBES SURG</addtitle><addtitle>Obes Surg</addtitle><description>Background An underlying major aim of bariatric surgery is weight loss and its long-term maintenance. In spite of this, most studies regarding weight loss after surgical treatment of morbid obesity show 3-year follow-up results. We evaluated the effectiveness of silastic ring Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (SR-RYGBP) in promoting significant weight loss after an 8-year follow-up at the Londrina State University Hospital. Methods From May 1999 to December 2000, 211 morbidly obese patients were submitted to SR-RYGBP by the same surgical team. The study’s design was longitudinal, prospective, and descriptive. The analysis of postoperative weight decrease was based on excess weight loss in percentage (%EWL) and the calculation of body mass index. Therapeutic failure was considered when patients lost &lt;50% of excess weight. Results Patients lost to follow-up were 36.5%; therefore, 134 patients were included in this study. The average global EWL was 67.6 ± 14.9% on the first postoperative year, 72.6 ± 14.9% on the second year, 69.7 ± 15.1% on the fifth postoperative year, and 66.8 ± 7.6% on the eight postoperative year. Surgical treatment failure occurred in 15 patients (7.1%) over 8 years. Conclusions SR-RYGBP was effective in promoting and maintaining weight loss in the long term with a low failure rate.</description><subject>Adolescent</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Clinical outcomes</subject><subject>Clinical Research</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Follow-Up Studies</subject><subject>Gastric Bypass - methods</subject><subject>Gastrointestinal surgery</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Long term</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Medicine &amp; Public Health</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Obesity</subject><subject>Obesity, Morbid - surgery</subject><subject>Prospective Studies</subject><subject>Prostheses and Implants</subject><subject>Surgery</subject><subject>Treatment Outcome</subject><subject>Weight control</subject><subject>Weight Loss</subject><subject>Young Adult</subject><issn>0960-8923</issn><issn>1708-0428</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2010</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kUtLJDEURoM4aI_jD3AzBDfOJnqTVF7uVNQRGgTnhauQSqd6SqorbVKF-u8nTfuAAV0Fbs797k0OQnsUDimAOsqUSiMIUCDAZEXYBppQBZpAxfQmmoCRQLRhfBt9zvkOgFHJ2BbaZqApNUJP0O8_oZ3_HfA05oyvx8HHRcAnzRAS_tF2Lg-txzdtP8c3cXwkoSe3-LJUUymfPi1dzsdY49vgUsaxwRex6-IDGZdf0KfGdTnsPp876NfF-c-z72R6fXl1djIlvgI-EOM9N4pTcCBEE4IBLpyEuqq4mUlZN1VTCyUbr2qpmXeSG-_AS6FntOaK8R10sM5dpng_hjzYRZt96DrXhzhmq4SiSopKFPLbhyTVXHFWKcMLuv8fehfH1Jd3WK00cA1qBdE15FP5uhQau0ztwqUnS8Gu7Ni1HVvs2JUdu9r263PwWC_C7LXjRUcB2BrI5aqfh_Q2-f3Uf6jdlyQ</recordid><startdate>20101101</startdate><enddate>20101101</enddate><creator>Valezi, Antonio Carlos</creator><creator>Junior, Jorge Mali</creator><creator>de Menezes, Mariano Almeida</creator><creator>de Brito, Edivaldo Macedo</creator><creator>de Souza, Shirley A. F.</creator><general>Springer-Verlag</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>7TS</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20101101</creationdate><title>Weight Loss Outcome After Silastic Ring Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass: 8 Years of Follow-up</title><author>Valezi, Antonio Carlos ; Junior, Jorge Mali ; de Menezes, Mariano Almeida ; de Brito, Edivaldo Macedo ; de Souza, Shirley A. F.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c403t-9cc397310a055fee9035a60b4439d66bf4fb576fc7b682ca639ca0c658d1b3723</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2010</creationdate><topic>Adolescent</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Clinical outcomes</topic><topic>Clinical Research</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Follow-Up Studies</topic><topic>Gastric Bypass - methods</topic><topic>Gastrointestinal surgery</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Long term</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Medicine &amp; Public Health</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Obesity</topic><topic>Obesity, Morbid - surgery</topic><topic>Prospective Studies</topic><topic>Prostheses and Implants</topic><topic>Surgery</topic><topic>Treatment Outcome</topic><topic>Weight control</topic><topic>Weight Loss</topic><topic>Young Adult</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Valezi, Antonio Carlos</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Junior, Jorge Mali</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>de Menezes, Mariano Almeida</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>de Brito, Edivaldo Macedo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>de Souza, Shirley A. F.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Public Health Database</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>PML(ProQuest Medical Library)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Physical Education Index</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Obesity surgery</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Valezi, Antonio Carlos</au><au>Junior, Jorge Mali</au><au>de Menezes, Mariano Almeida</au><au>de Brito, Edivaldo Macedo</au><au>de Souza, Shirley A. F.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Weight Loss Outcome After Silastic Ring Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass: 8 Years of Follow-up</atitle><jtitle>Obesity surgery</jtitle><stitle>OBES SURG</stitle><addtitle>Obes Surg</addtitle><date>2010-11-01</date><risdate>2010</risdate><volume>20</volume><issue>11</issue><spage>1491</spage><epage>1495</epage><pages>1491-1495</pages><issn>0960-8923</issn><eissn>1708-0428</eissn><abstract>Background An underlying major aim of bariatric surgery is weight loss and its long-term maintenance. In spite of this, most studies regarding weight loss after surgical treatment of morbid obesity show 3-year follow-up results. We evaluated the effectiveness of silastic ring Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (SR-RYGBP) in promoting significant weight loss after an 8-year follow-up at the Londrina State University Hospital. Methods From May 1999 to December 2000, 211 morbidly obese patients were submitted to SR-RYGBP by the same surgical team. The study’s design was longitudinal, prospective, and descriptive. The analysis of postoperative weight decrease was based on excess weight loss in percentage (%EWL) and the calculation of body mass index. Therapeutic failure was considered when patients lost &lt;50% of excess weight. Results Patients lost to follow-up were 36.5%; therefore, 134 patients were included in this study. The average global EWL was 67.6 ± 14.9% on the first postoperative year, 72.6 ± 14.9% on the second year, 69.7 ± 15.1% on the fifth postoperative year, and 66.8 ± 7.6% on the eight postoperative year. Surgical treatment failure occurred in 15 patients (7.1%) over 8 years. Conclusions SR-RYGBP was effective in promoting and maintaining weight loss in the long term with a low failure rate.</abstract><cop>New York</cop><pub>Springer-Verlag</pub><pmid>20811958</pmid><doi>10.1007/s11695-010-0264-2</doi><tpages>5</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0960-8923
ispartof Obesity surgery, 2010-11, Vol.20 (11), p.1491-1495
issn 0960-8923
1708-0428
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_757176545
source MEDLINE; SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings
subjects Adolescent
Adult
Aged
Clinical outcomes
Clinical Research
Female
Follow-Up Studies
Gastric Bypass - methods
Gastrointestinal surgery
Humans
Long term
Male
Medicine
Medicine & Public Health
Middle Aged
Obesity
Obesity, Morbid - surgery
Prospective Studies
Prostheses and Implants
Surgery
Treatment Outcome
Weight control
Weight Loss
Young Adult
title Weight Loss Outcome After Silastic Ring Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass: 8 Years of Follow-up
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-14T19%3A46%3A26IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Weight%20Loss%20Outcome%20After%20Silastic%20Ring%20Roux-en-Y%20Gastric%20Bypass:%208%20Years%20of%20Follow-up&rft.jtitle=Obesity%20surgery&rft.au=Valezi,%20Antonio%20Carlos&rft.date=2010-11-01&rft.volume=20&rft.issue=11&rft.spage=1491&rft.epage=1495&rft.pages=1491-1495&rft.issn=0960-8923&rft.eissn=1708-0428&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s11695-010-0264-2&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2402368461%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=878038073&rft_id=info:pmid/20811958&rfr_iscdi=true