Functional magnetic resonance cholangiography (fMRC) of the gallbladder and biliary tree with contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance cholangiography

Purpose To determine the diagnostic performance of functional magnetic resonance cholangiography (fMRC) for the evaluation of anatomic and functional biliary disorders. Materials and Methods At 1.5 T, 39 MR examinations with conventional MRC and mangafodipir trisodium‐enhanced fMRC were retrospectiv...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of magnetic resonance imaging 2003-10, Vol.18 (4), p.449-460
Hauptverfasser: Fayad, Laura M., Holland, George A., Bergin, Diane, Iqbal, Nasir, Parker, Laurence, Curcillo II, Paul G., Kowalski, Thomas E., Park, Pauline, Intenzo, Charles, Mitchell, Donald G.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Purpose To determine the diagnostic performance of functional magnetic resonance cholangiography (fMRC) for the evaluation of anatomic and functional biliary disorders. Materials and Methods At 1.5 T, 39 MR examinations with conventional MRC and mangafodipir trisodium‐enhanced fMRC were retrospectively reviewed by three observers who recorded anatomic (duct dilation, stricture, filling defects) and functional (cholecystitis, obstruction) abnormalities in three modes: MRC alone, fMRC alone, and MRC and fMRC images together (combined‐MRC). Performance was determined by comparing findings with each mode to findings of invasive cholangiography (IC) and surgery. Results Among 75 biliary segments (correlated with IC), the sensitivity/specificity for diagnosing dilation (N = 41) with MRC was 95%/97%; with fMRC, 90%/100%; with combined‐MRC, 100%/97%. For stricture (N = 7), the sensitivity/specificity of MRC was 86%/98%; of fMRC, 43%/100%; of combined‐MRC, 86%/100%. For filling defects (N = 9), the sensitivity/specificity of MRC was 91%/98%; of fMRC, 82%/100%; of combined‐MRC, 91%/100%. For diagnosing obstruction (N = 9), the sensitivity/specificity of MRC, fMRC, and combined‐MRC were 89%/100%, 100%/100%, and 100%/100%, respectively. For surgically proven cholecystitis (N = 13), positive predictive values for diagnosing acute/chronic cholecystitis for MRC were 33%/40%; for fMRC, 100%/50%; for combined‐MRC, 100%/50%. Conclusion Although single‐shot fast spin echo (SSFSE)‐MRC is valuable, the addition of fMRC increased diagnostic performance for functional biliary disorders. J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2003;18:449–460. © 2003 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.
ISSN:1053-1807
1522-2586
DOI:10.1002/jmri.10369