Presentation of pain drawings in questionnaire surveys: influence on prevalence of neck and upper limb pain in the community
Pain drawings can be presented as either a blank or a pre-shaded manikin. This study sought to determine the effect of these two presentations on prevalence estimates of neck and upper limb pain (NULP), and their relationship to patterns of pain report. A postal questionnaire was sent to a stratifie...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Pain (Amsterdam) 2003-09, Vol.105 (1), p.293-301 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 301 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 1 |
| container_start_page | 293 |
| container_title | Pain (Amsterdam) |
| container_volume | 105 |
| creator | Lacey, Rosie J Lewis, Martyn Sim, Julius |
| description | Pain drawings can be presented as either a blank or a pre-shaded manikin. This study sought to determine the effect of these two presentations on prevalence estimates of neck and upper limb pain (NULP), and their relationship to patterns of pain report.
A postal questionnaire was sent to a stratified random sample of 10,000 adults. It contained a blank body manikin and a pre-shaded neck and upper limb manikin screening question. Respondents answering positively to the pre-shaded manikin were asked about pain intensity, affect, disability and duration. Other measures included general health status (SF-12v2) and demographic questions.
Adjusted response rate was 53.5%. Age-standardized 1-month period prevalence was 44.0% (crude prevalence 50.5%) for the screening question and 37.3% (crude prevalence 42.1%) for the blank manikin. There was 88% agreement between the pre-shaded manikin and the shading of corresponding areas on the blank manikin (kappa=0.76, 95% CI=0.74, 0.78). Of the 603 disagreements, 509 comprised no shading on the blank manikin but positive response to the pre-shaded manikin; they reported lower pain intensity, fewer days with pain, shorter time since initial onset and less disability than the 2030 reporting NULP on both manikins (
P |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1016/S0304-3959(03)00244-6 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_75698962</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0304395903002446</els_id><sourcerecordid>75698962</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c391t-7c79b2d7edccb7996b02ed5760a5c8cddd43cfe155aa0f2ee79c1e0a8eaa05c03</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkF2L1DAUhoMo7uzoT1Byo6wX1aRJmok3IotfsKCgXof05FSjbVqTdmTAH29mOriXQiA5nOe8SR5CHnH2nDPevPjMBJOVMMpcMfGMsVrKqrlDNnyn66ppanGXbP4hF-Qy5x-sUHVt7pMLLqUxUuoN-fMpYcY4uzmMkY4dnVyI1Cf3O8RvmZbzrwXzsRldSEjzkvZ4yC9Lp-sXjIC0zE0J965fq45GhJ_URU-XacJE-zC0a2xZ83ekMA7DEsN8eEDuda7P-PC8b8nXt2--XL-vbj6--3D9-qYCYfhcadCmrb1GD9BqY5qW1eiVbphTsAPvvRTQIVfKOdbViNoAR-Z2WGoFTGzJ0zV3SuPpO3YIGbDvXcRxyVarxuxMcbYlagUhjTkn7OyUwuDSwXJmj9rtSbs9OrVM2JN225S5x-cLlnZAfzt19lyAJ2fAZXB9l1yEkG85xWXJFIV7tXJYdOwDJpshHL36Ih9m68fwn6f8BZN_ons</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>75698962</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Presentation of pain drawings in questionnaire surveys: influence on prevalence of neck and upper limb pain in the community</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Journals@Ovid Complete</source><creator>Lacey, Rosie J ; Lewis, Martyn ; Sim, Julius</creator><creatorcontrib>Lacey, Rosie J ; Lewis, Martyn ; Sim, Julius</creatorcontrib><description>Pain drawings can be presented as either a blank or a pre-shaded manikin. This study sought to determine the effect of these two presentations on prevalence estimates of neck and upper limb pain (NULP), and their relationship to patterns of pain report.
A postal questionnaire was sent to a stratified random sample of 10,000 adults. It contained a blank body manikin and a pre-shaded neck and upper limb manikin screening question. Respondents answering positively to the pre-shaded manikin were asked about pain intensity, affect, disability and duration. Other measures included general health status (SF-12v2) and demographic questions.
Adjusted response rate was 53.5%. Age-standardized 1-month period prevalence was 44.0% (crude prevalence 50.5%) for the screening question and 37.3% (crude prevalence 42.1%) for the blank manikin. There was 88% agreement between the pre-shaded manikin and the shading of corresponding areas on the blank manikin (kappa=0.76, 95% CI=0.74, 0.78). Of the 603 disagreements, 509 comprised no shading on the blank manikin but positive response to the pre-shaded manikin; they reported lower pain intensity, fewer days with pain, shorter time since initial onset and less disability than the 2030 reporting NULP on both manikins (
P<0.001 in each case).
The form of manikin presentation in a postal questionnaire can shift the reported prevalence of pain; a difference of 6.7% in our study. Furthermore, respondents only answering positively to a pre-shaded manikin form a group experiencing less severe NULP and less associated disability.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0304-3959</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1872-6623</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/S0304-3959(03)00244-6</identifier><identifier>PMID: 14499447</identifier><identifier>CODEN: PAINDB</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Amsterdam: Elsevier B.V</publisher><subject>Adult ; Aged ; Arm ; Biological and medical sciences ; Cross-Sectional Studies ; Female ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; Health survey ; Health Surveys ; Humans ; Illness and personality ; Illness, stress and coping ; Injections, Intradermal ; Male ; Manikins ; Medical Illustration ; Middle Aged ; Neck ; Pain - epidemiology ; Pain - physiopathology ; Pain measurement ; Prevalence ; Psychology and medicine ; Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry ; Psychology. Psychophysiology ; Questionnaire ; Surveys and Questionnaires ; United Kingdom ; Upper extremity</subject><ispartof>Pain (Amsterdam), 2003-09, Vol.105 (1), p.293-301</ispartof><rights>2003 International Association for the Study of Pain</rights><rights>2004 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c391t-7c79b2d7edccb7996b02ed5760a5c8cddd43cfe155aa0f2ee79c1e0a8eaa05c03</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c391t-7c79b2d7edccb7996b02ed5760a5c8cddd43cfe155aa0f2ee79c1e0a8eaa05c03</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=15143953$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/14499447$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Lacey, Rosie J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lewis, Martyn</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sim, Julius</creatorcontrib><title>Presentation of pain drawings in questionnaire surveys: influence on prevalence of neck and upper limb pain in the community</title><title>Pain (Amsterdam)</title><addtitle>Pain</addtitle><description>Pain drawings can be presented as either a blank or a pre-shaded manikin. This study sought to determine the effect of these two presentations on prevalence estimates of neck and upper limb pain (NULP), and their relationship to patterns of pain report.
A postal questionnaire was sent to a stratified random sample of 10,000 adults. It contained a blank body manikin and a pre-shaded neck and upper limb manikin screening question. Respondents answering positively to the pre-shaded manikin were asked about pain intensity, affect, disability and duration. Other measures included general health status (SF-12v2) and demographic questions.
Adjusted response rate was 53.5%. Age-standardized 1-month period prevalence was 44.0% (crude prevalence 50.5%) for the screening question and 37.3% (crude prevalence 42.1%) for the blank manikin. There was 88% agreement between the pre-shaded manikin and the shading of corresponding areas on the blank manikin (kappa=0.76, 95% CI=0.74, 0.78). Of the 603 disagreements, 509 comprised no shading on the blank manikin but positive response to the pre-shaded manikin; they reported lower pain intensity, fewer days with pain, shorter time since initial onset and less disability than the 2030 reporting NULP on both manikins (
P<0.001 in each case).
The form of manikin presentation in a postal questionnaire can shift the reported prevalence of pain; a difference of 6.7% in our study. Furthermore, respondents only answering positively to a pre-shaded manikin form a group experiencing less severe NULP and less associated disability.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Arm</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Cross-Sectional Studies</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>Health survey</subject><subject>Health Surveys</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Illness and personality</subject><subject>Illness, stress and coping</subject><subject>Injections, Intradermal</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Manikins</subject><subject>Medical Illustration</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Neck</subject><subject>Pain - epidemiology</subject><subject>Pain - physiopathology</subject><subject>Pain measurement</subject><subject>Prevalence</subject><subject>Psychology and medicine</subject><subject>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</subject><subject>Psychology. Psychophysiology</subject><subject>Questionnaire</subject><subject>Surveys and Questionnaires</subject><subject>United Kingdom</subject><subject>Upper extremity</subject><issn>0304-3959</issn><issn>1872-6623</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2003</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkF2L1DAUhoMo7uzoT1Byo6wX1aRJmok3IotfsKCgXof05FSjbVqTdmTAH29mOriXQiA5nOe8SR5CHnH2nDPevPjMBJOVMMpcMfGMsVrKqrlDNnyn66ppanGXbP4hF-Qy5x-sUHVt7pMLLqUxUuoN-fMpYcY4uzmMkY4dnVyI1Cf3O8RvmZbzrwXzsRldSEjzkvZ4yC9Lp-sXjIC0zE0J965fq45GhJ_URU-XacJE-zC0a2xZ83ekMA7DEsN8eEDuda7P-PC8b8nXt2--XL-vbj6--3D9-qYCYfhcadCmrb1GD9BqY5qW1eiVbphTsAPvvRTQIVfKOdbViNoAR-Z2WGoFTGzJ0zV3SuPpO3YIGbDvXcRxyVarxuxMcbYlagUhjTkn7OyUwuDSwXJmj9rtSbs9OrVM2JN225S5x-cLlnZAfzt19lyAJ2fAZXB9l1yEkG85xWXJFIV7tXJYdOwDJpshHL36Ih9m68fwn6f8BZN_ons</recordid><startdate>20030901</startdate><enddate>20030901</enddate><creator>Lacey, Rosie J</creator><creator>Lewis, Martyn</creator><creator>Sim, Julius</creator><general>Elsevier B.V</general><general>Elsevier</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20030901</creationdate><title>Presentation of pain drawings in questionnaire surveys: influence on prevalence of neck and upper limb pain in the community</title><author>Lacey, Rosie J ; Lewis, Martyn ; Sim, Julius</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c391t-7c79b2d7edccb7996b02ed5760a5c8cddd43cfe155aa0f2ee79c1e0a8eaa05c03</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2003</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Arm</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Cross-Sectional Studies</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>Health survey</topic><topic>Health Surveys</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Illness and personality</topic><topic>Illness, stress and coping</topic><topic>Injections, Intradermal</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Manikins</topic><topic>Medical Illustration</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Neck</topic><topic>Pain - epidemiology</topic><topic>Pain - physiopathology</topic><topic>Pain measurement</topic><topic>Prevalence</topic><topic>Psychology and medicine</topic><topic>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</topic><topic>Psychology. Psychophysiology</topic><topic>Questionnaire</topic><topic>Surveys and Questionnaires</topic><topic>United Kingdom</topic><topic>Upper extremity</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Lacey, Rosie J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lewis, Martyn</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sim, Julius</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Pain (Amsterdam)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Lacey, Rosie J</au><au>Lewis, Martyn</au><au>Sim, Julius</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Presentation of pain drawings in questionnaire surveys: influence on prevalence of neck and upper limb pain in the community</atitle><jtitle>Pain (Amsterdam)</jtitle><addtitle>Pain</addtitle><date>2003-09-01</date><risdate>2003</risdate><volume>105</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>293</spage><epage>301</epage><pages>293-301</pages><issn>0304-3959</issn><eissn>1872-6623</eissn><coden>PAINDB</coden><abstract>Pain drawings can be presented as either a blank or a pre-shaded manikin. This study sought to determine the effect of these two presentations on prevalence estimates of neck and upper limb pain (NULP), and their relationship to patterns of pain report.
A postal questionnaire was sent to a stratified random sample of 10,000 adults. It contained a blank body manikin and a pre-shaded neck and upper limb manikin screening question. Respondents answering positively to the pre-shaded manikin were asked about pain intensity, affect, disability and duration. Other measures included general health status (SF-12v2) and demographic questions.
Adjusted response rate was 53.5%. Age-standardized 1-month period prevalence was 44.0% (crude prevalence 50.5%) for the screening question and 37.3% (crude prevalence 42.1%) for the blank manikin. There was 88% agreement between the pre-shaded manikin and the shading of corresponding areas on the blank manikin (kappa=0.76, 95% CI=0.74, 0.78). Of the 603 disagreements, 509 comprised no shading on the blank manikin but positive response to the pre-shaded manikin; they reported lower pain intensity, fewer days with pain, shorter time since initial onset and less disability than the 2030 reporting NULP on both manikins (
P<0.001 in each case).
The form of manikin presentation in a postal questionnaire can shift the reported prevalence of pain; a difference of 6.7% in our study. Furthermore, respondents only answering positively to a pre-shaded manikin form a group experiencing less severe NULP and less associated disability.</abstract><cop>Amsterdam</cop><pub>Elsevier B.V</pub><pmid>14499447</pmid><doi>10.1016/S0304-3959(03)00244-6</doi><tpages>9</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0304-3959 |
| ispartof | Pain (Amsterdam), 2003-09, Vol.105 (1), p.293-301 |
| issn | 0304-3959 1872-6623 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_75698962 |
| source | MEDLINE; Journals@Ovid Complete |
| subjects | Adult Aged Arm Biological and medical sciences Cross-Sectional Studies Female Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology Health survey Health Surveys Humans Illness and personality Illness, stress and coping Injections, Intradermal Male Manikins Medical Illustration Middle Aged Neck Pain - epidemiology Pain - physiopathology Pain measurement Prevalence Psychology and medicine Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry Psychology. Psychophysiology Questionnaire Surveys and Questionnaires United Kingdom Upper extremity |
| title | Presentation of pain drawings in questionnaire surveys: influence on prevalence of neck and upper limb pain in the community |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-07T07%3A06%3A13IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Presentation%20of%20pain%20drawings%20in%20questionnaire%20surveys:%20influence%20on%20prevalence%20of%20neck%20and%20upper%20limb%20pain%20in%20the%20community&rft.jtitle=Pain%20(Amsterdam)&rft.au=Lacey,%20Rosie%20J&rft.date=2003-09-01&rft.volume=105&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=293&rft.epage=301&rft.pages=293-301&rft.issn=0304-3959&rft.eissn=1872-6623&rft.coden=PAINDB&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/S0304-3959(03)00244-6&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E75698962%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=75698962&rft_id=info:pmid/14499447&rft_els_id=S0304395903002446&rfr_iscdi=true |